Skip to main content
International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife logoLink to International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
. 2015 May 8;4(2):256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.04.007

The cestode community in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) on St. Paul Island, Alaska

Tetiana A Kuzmina a, Jesús S Hernández-Orts b,c, Eugene T Lyons d, Terry R Spraker e, Vadym V Kornyushyn a, Roman Kuchta c,*
PMCID: PMC4468367  PMID: 26101743

Highlights

  • Three species of cestodes were found in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus).

  • Prevalence and intensity of cestodes collected from five haul-outs were studied.

  • Ecology and maturity of cestodes were analyzed.

Keywords: Adenocephalus pacificus (Diphyllobothrium pacificum); Anophryocephalus cf. ochotensis; Cestoda; Diphyllobothridea; Diplogonoporus tetrapterus; Otariidae, North Pacific; Tapeworms; Tetrabothriidea

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name ijppaw112-ga-5001.jpg

Abstract

The diversity and ecology of cestodes from the northern fur seals, Callorhinus ursinus (NFS), were examined using newly collected material from 756 humanely harvested subadult males between 2011 and 2014. NFSs were collected from five different haul-outs on St. Paul Island, Alaska. A total of 14,660 tapeworms were collected with a prevalence of 98.5% and intensity up to 107 cestodes per host (mean intensity 19.7 ± 16.5 SD). Three species of tapeworms were found: Adenocephalus pacificus (Diphyllobothriidea) was the most prevalent (prevalence 97.4%), followed by Diplogonoporus tetrapterus (49.7%), and 5 immature specimens of Anophryocephalus cf. ochotensis (Tetrabothriidea) (0.5%). Most of the cestodes found in the NFS were immature (69.7%). However, only 0.9% of cestodes were in larval (plerocercoid) stages. The species composition, prevalence and intensity of cestodes from these NFSs were not statistically different between the five separate haul-outs. Significant increases in the intensity of NFS infections were observed during the study period.

1. Introduction

The northern fur seal, Callorhinus ursinus (Linnaeus) (NFS), has been documented as a host for more than 35 species of helminths (Delyamure, 1961; Dailey and Brownell, 1972; Margolis and Dailey, 1972; Yurakhno, 1998; Atrashkevich, 2008).

The first tapeworm described from NFSs was Bothriocephalus sp. by Stiles and Hassall (1899) from the Pribilof Archipelago (St. George Island) (Fig. 1). Nybelin (1931) later described that species as Adenocephalus septentrionalis Nybelin 1931, as the second species of his newly erected genus Adenocephalus Nybelin 1931 with the type species A. pacificus Nybelin 1931, from the Juan Fernández fur seal Arctocephalus philippii Peters. Stunkard (1948) studied NFS cestodes from St. Paul Island, Alaska, and recorded two unidentified species (reported as species Nos. 2 and 3) which corresponded with A. pacificus and Diplogonoporus tetrapterus (Siebold, 1848) (Delyamure et al., 1985; Hernández-Orts et al., 2015). Later, several authors reported A. pacificus from NFSs on St. Paul and St. George Islands, Alaska (Markowski, 1952; Margolis, 1956), but also from Honshu Island (Sanriku), Japan (Yamaguti, 1951; Machida, 1969) and Far East Russia from Sakhalin and Tyuleniy Islands (Krotov and Delyamure, 1952; Chupakhina, 1971) (Fig. 1). Adenocephalus pacificus was also reported under different names as Diphyllobothrium glaciale (Cholodovsky, 1915), Diphyllobothrium pacificum, Diphyllobothrium hians (Diesing, 1850) or Diphyllobothrium krotovi Delyamure, 1955 (Rausch et al., 2010), but recently, Hernández-Orts et al. (2015) transferred D. pacificum back to the genus Adenocephalus based on molecular and morphological evidence. Diplogonoporus tetrapterus was reported rarely in NFSs off St. Paul Island and Valdez, Alaska (Stunkard, 1948; Rausch, 1964) (Fig. 1). Yurakhno (1986) described a new species, Diplogonoporus violettae Yurakhno, 1986, collected from a Steller sea lion, Eumetopias jubatus (Schreber), from Karaginsky Gulf, Russia, and concluded that diplogonids reported from NFSs by Wardle et al. (1947), Margolis (1956) and Rausch (1964) belonged to this new species (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Map showing the areas at which helminths of the northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) have been studied by previous authors (gray circles) and the present authors (black circle) in the Bering Sea. The detailed map of St. Paul Island, Alaska with sampling sites (rookeries) is enlarged.

Additionally, four other tapeworm species have been reported from NFSs: Anophryocephalus ochotensis (Delyamure, 1955), Diphyllobothrium hians, Diphyllobothrium lanceolatum (Krabbe, 1865), and Pyramicocephalus phocarum (Fabricius, 1780), as well as phyllobothriidean plerocercoids Scolex pleuronectis Müller, 1788 (Delyamure, 1955; Dailey and Brownell, 1972; Margolis and Dailey, 1972; Yurakhno and Taikov, 1986; Yurakhno, 1998; Kamo, 1999). However, most of these taxa are not specific parasites of NFSs (such as D. hians, D. lanceolatum, or P. phocarum), and may represent misidentifications of the morphologically variable A. pacificus and D. tetrapterus (Delyamure et al., 1985; Hernández-Orts et al., 2015).

Studies of several aspects of NFS biology on the Pribilof archipelago have been undertaken regularly since 1944 (Scheffer et al., 1984; Ream, 2008), but only few parasitological surveys, mainly on hookworms, anisakid nematodes and acanthocephalans, have been published (Stiles and Hassall, 1899; Olsen and Lyons, 1962; Keyes, 1964, 1965; Lyons et al., 2000, 2003, 2011; Ionita et al., 2008; Kuzmina et al., 2012, 2014). Cestodes have been superficially mentioned in a few reports (Stiles and Hassall, 1899; Stunkard, 1948; Yamaguti, 1951; Krotov and Delyamure, 1952; Markowski, 1952; Delyamure, 1955; Machida, 1969; Kamo et al., 1982; Scheffer et al., 1984; Yurakhno, 1998; Ionita et al., 2008). Despite the thousands of seals slaughtered every year from the Pribilof archipelago (Scheffer et al., 1984; Ream, 2008), detailed studies on the diversity and prevalence of cestodes from NFSs have not been performed.

The objective of the present study was to characterize the species composition of cestodes from NFSs based on newly collected material from St. Paul Island, Alaska, including re-examination of type- and voucher material from several helminthological collections (see Hernández-Orts et al., 2015). Comparison of the species composition, prevalence and intensity of cestodes among five subpopulations of NFSs inhabiting different rookeries on St. Paul Island also was performed (Fig. 1).

2. Materials and methods

This study was carried out on St. Paul Island, Alaska (57°09′ N, 170°13′ W) in July–August, 2011 to 2014 (Fig. 1). The gastrointestinal tracts of 756 humanely harvested subadult NFS males (3–4 years old) were collected during four annual Aleut subsistence harvests at haul-out areas on five rookeries: Polovina (n = 164), Morjovi (n = 120), Zapadni (n = 182), Lukanin (n = 165) and Gorbatch (n = 125) (Fig. 1). The research was done under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act Permit Number 14327 issued to the National Marine Mammal Laboratory.

The gastrointestinal tracts of freshly killed NFSs were collected in the field and placed in separate plastic bags, delivered to the laboratory, dissected and examined by classical methods (Bowman and Lynn, 1995). The age of NFS examined was estimated according to the size of their stomachs – stomachs were significantly larger in 4-year old NFSs than in 3-year old seals. All helminthes (more than 7700 specimens of nematodes, 14,660 cestodes, 1200 acanthocephalans and 3700 trematodes) were collected manually from the intestines. The cestodes were washed in saline and fixed in hot (>90 °C) tap water and stored in 70% ethanol. The cestodes were identified based on morphological characters according to Delyamure (1955,1985) and Hernández-Orts et al. (2015), and compared with type- and voucher specimens deposited in several helminthological collections [see Hernández-Orts et al. (2015) for material of A. pacificus; type material of D. tetrapterus from the Natural History Museum, London, UK (BMNH Nos. 51.7.24.58 and 51.7.24.27); and one specimen from type series of D. violettae deposited at the Helminthological collection of the Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (IPCAS C-683)]. Current identifications were also supported by phylogenetic analyses based on molecular data (LSU and cox1) (Hernández-Orts et al., 2015; Kuchta unpublished data).

Whole-mounted specimens were stained with Schuberg's hydrochloric carmine and mounted in Canada balsam. A total of 45 scoleces and segments were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) following the procedure outlined by Kuchta and Caira (2010).

Studied material has been deposited in the parasitological collection of the Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv (Nos. SAM 0-1-SAM 22-16), IPCAS (Nos. IPCAS C-497 and C-682) and National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution (Nos. 1241612 and 1241613).

Data summaries and descriptive analyses were calculated using the Microsoft™ Excel. The Paleontological Statistics Software (PAST) (Hammer et al., 2001) was used for statistical analysis of the results obtained. Mann–Whitney and Chi-square tests were used to analyze differences in prevalence and intensity of NFS infection and from separate haul-outs on the island. Infection parameters were estimated according to Bush et al. (1997) and Rózsa et al. (2000). The prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity are provided with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sterne's exact 95% CI was calculated for prevalence (Reiczigel, 2003). Mean abundance and mean intensity 95% CIs were estimated with 20,000 bootstrap replications with the statistical software Quantitative Parasitology v. 3.0 (Rózsa et al., 2000).

3. Results

A total of 14,660 cestodes were collected from 745 of 756 NFSs with a total prevalence of 98.5% (Table 1). The intensity of infection was up to 107 (mean intensity 19.7 ± 16.5 SD; median intensity 16) cestodes per host (Table 1). Significant differences in prevalence and intensity of NFS infection from separate haul-outs were not observed (Mann–Whitney test; p > 0.05).

Table 1.

Infection parameters of cestodes found in 756 northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) from different haul-out areas of St. Paul Island, Alaska (2011–2014). Abbreviations: CI – confidence intervals; P – prevalence; MA – mean abundance; MI – mean intensity.

Haul-out areas (rookeries) No. of seals P % (95% CI) MI (95% CI) MA (95% CI) Median intensity Range
Polovina 164 98.2 (94.6–99.5) 20.7 (18.4–23.6) 20.3 (17.9–23.1) 16 1–107
Morjovi 120 99.2 (95.6–100) 19.4 (16.7–22.5) 19.3 (16.6–22.4) 14 1–79
Zapadni 182 99.5 (96.9–100) 21.7 (19.4–24.1) 21.5 (19.3–24.0) 18 1–96
Lukanin 165 97.0 (93.1–98.8) 18.3 (16.1–21.0) 17.7 (15.5–20.4) 13 1–66
Gorbatch 125 99.2 (95.7–100) 17.4 (15.0–20.5) 17.3 (15.0–20.4) 13.5 1–80
Total 756 98.5 (97.4–99.2) 19.7 (18.5–20.9) 19.4 (18.3–20.6) 16 1–107

Intensity of infection within seals varied widely (Table 1). Distribution of cestodes in NFS populations on St. Paul Island were overdispersed; most of the seals (n = 260) harbored from 1 to 10 cestodes, while just a few hosts harbored several dozen parasites (Fig. 2A). Similar patterns of cestode distribution were observed from different rookeries (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Distribution of cestodes in the northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) (A) and between sub-populations inhabiting separate haul-outs (B) from St. Paul Island, Alaska.

Significant differences in the prevalence and intensity of NFS infections were observed between different years (Table 2) (Mann–Whitney test; p <0.05). The intensity of infection significantly increased from 2011 to 2014 (Mann–Whitney test; p <0.05). However, we did not find statistically significant differences in prevalence and intensity of infections between seals of two age groups (3 and 4 years old) (Mann–Whitney test; p > 0.05).

Table 2.

Infection parameters of cestodes found in 756 northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) from St. Paul Island, Alaska (2011–2014). Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; P, prevalence; MI, mean intensity.

Year No. of seals Cestodes Adenocephalus pacificus Diplogonoporus tetrapterus
P % (95% CI) MI (95% CI) Range P % (95% CI) MI (95% CI) Range P % (95% CI) MI (95% CI) Range
2011 105 99.0 (95.0–100) 13.2 (11.3–15.3) 1–47 98.1 (93.1–99.7) 12.1 (10.2–14.1) 1–45 37.1 (28.1–47.1) 3.0 (2.5–3.6) 1–9
2012 301 98.3 (96.1–99.3) 18.1 (16.3–20.1) 1–96 97.0 (94.4–98.5) 16.4 (14.7–18.4) 1–96 42.5 (37.0–48.2) 4.2 (3.5–5.2) 1–21
2013 203 98.0 (94.9–99.3) 21.2 (19.3–23.3) 1–80 96.6 (92.3–98.8) 18.1 (16.1–20.2) 1–80 51.7 (44.8–58.6) 5.6 (4.7–6.8) 1–29
2014 147 99.3 (96.4–100) 25.3 (22.5–28.5) 1–107 98.6 (95.1–99.8) 23.1 (20.3–26.4) 1–107 34.7 (27.2–42.8) 6.2 (5.1–7.8) 1–23

From the 14,660 cestodes collected, 99.9% belong to the two diphyllobothriid tapeworms; A. pacificus (n = 12,940, i.e. 88.3% of total number of cestodes reported) and D. tetrapterus (n = 1559, 10.6%). In addition, only five sexually immature individual Anophryocephalus cf. ochotensis (Tetrabothriidea) were found (Table 3). Most of the cestodes found were immature; specimens with gravid segments represented only 30.3% of the total number of cestodes found (from 14.9% to 40.8% in separate haul-outs). Statistically significant differences between proportions of mature/immature cestodes were observed between the five sub-populations of the NFSs (Chi squared = 12.9; p = 0.01).

Table 3.

Prevalence and intensity of infection in northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) with cestodes from separate haul-outs (rookeries) on St. Paul Island, Alaska (2011–2014). Abbreviations: CI – confidence intervals; P – prevalence; MI – mean intensity.

Haul-outs (rookeries) Adenocephalus pacificus Diplogonoporus tetrapterus Anophryocephalus cf. ochotensis
P % (95% CI) MI (95% CI) P % (95% CI) MI (95% CI) P % (95% CI) MI
Polovina 97.0 (93.1–98.8) 18.5 (16.1–21.2) 47.0 (39.3–54.7) 4.8 (3.9–6.1) 0.6 (0.4–3.5) 2
Morjovi 97.5 (92.7–99.3) 17.7 (15.0–20.8) 43.3 (34.5–52.5) 4.1 (3.3–5.1) 0.8 (0.5–4.5) 1
Zapadni 97.8 (94.4–99.2) 19.0 (16.8–21.5) 47.8 (40.6–55.2) 5.5 (4.5–6.9) 0.5 (0.3–3.2) 1
Lukanin 95.8 (91.3–98.0) 16.4 (14.1–18.9) 36.4 (29.3–44.0) 5.3 (4.1–6.9) 0.6 (0.4–3.5) 1
Gorbatch 99.2 (95.7–100) 15.9 (13.6–19.1) 37.6 (29.5–46.4) 3.7 (2.9–5.0)
Total 97.4 (95.9–98.3) 17.6 (16.5–18.8) 42.7 (39.2–46.3) 4.8 (4.3–5.4) 0.5 (0.2–1.4) 1.3

Identification of most specimens to the species level was possible with the exception of the 156 plerocercoids (1.1% of the total number of tapeworms) in 10.9% of the NFSs. The shape of the scolex of A. pacificus is mostly lanceolate, with a short neck area and with short sharply craspedote anterior segments, whereas the scolex of D. tetrapterus is more oval, without a differentiated neck region, and without sharply craspedote anterior segments (Fig. 3). These characteristics seem to be quite stable and are used for identification of immature specimens, even though the variability of the shape of the scolex was high (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Scanning electron micrographs of cestodes from the northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus). Scoleces of adults of Adenocephalus pacificus (A–D, F). Scoleces of adults of Diplogonoporus tetrapterus (I–P). Gonopores of D. tetrapterus (O). Unidentified plerocercoids (E, G, H, R).

Adenocephalus pacificus was the most prevalent (97.4%) and abundant tapeworm from this study (Table 3). Statistically significant differences in the prevalence or intensity of infection with A. pacificus were not observed between separate haul-outs (Chi squared = 3.93; p = 0.42). Diplogonoporus tetrapterus was less common (42.7%; maximum intensity 29 cestodes per host) (Table 3). Statistically significant differences were not found in the prevalence and intensities of D. tetrapterus at the five haul-outs (Chi squared = 6.24; p = 0.18). This species showed a high morphological variability in the shape of scolex, and also in the number of genital pores per segment. The typical double genital pores were observed in 75% of gravid specimens (studied on 40 mature specimens) (Fig. 3).

At the infracommunity level, the richness of tapeworm species ranged from 1 to 3 species. A total of 430 NFSs (57.7%) were infected with one species, 312 seals (41.9%) with two species and 3 seals (0.4%) had all three species. Most of the NFSs (98.2%) were infected with A. pacificus, while only 8 seals (1.8%) were infected exclusively with D. tetrapterus. A single seal (0.1%) was infected with A. pacificus and Anophryocephalus cf. ochotensis. Significant differences were not found in the proportion of seals infected by one, two or three cestode species between the five NFS sub-populations (Chi squared = 13.1; p = 0.35).

4. Discussion

Tapeworms of the orders Diphyllobothriidea and Tetrabothriidea have been reported as common parasites of several species of marine mammals (Delyamure, 1955; Dailey and Brownell, 1972; Delyamure et al., 1985; Kamo, 1999; Hoberg and Adams, 2000).

However, data addressing their ecology, host specificity, prevalence and distribution are fragmented or incomplete. Thus, this is the first ecological study on tapeworms from the northern fur seal based on a large amount of a freshly collected material confirmed by morphological and molecular data (see Hernández-Orts et al., 2015). Moreover, these data were obtained during a large scale study over four consecutive seasons and with a high number of NFSs examined from the same area. This allowed a comprehensive analysis on the ecology of tapeworms from the NFSs on St. Paul Island, and an examination of the current state of the helminth fauna on this otariid species.

Most of the previous studies were focused on material collected sporadically from a small number of NFSs in different regions (Cholodkovsky, 1914; Nybelin, 1931; Afanasyev, 1941; Stunkard, 1948; Yamaguti, 1951; Markowski, 1952; Margolis, 1956) (Fig. 1). Detailed studies of the parasite fauna using large numbers of dissected NFSs were first performed in Alaska by Stiles and Hassall (1899) and later in the Russian Far East, on the Kuril and the Commander archipelagos (Bering and Medny Islands) (Chupakhina, 1971; Kovalenko, 1975; Yurakhno and Taikov, 1986; Yurakhno, 1998) (Fig. 1). The first eco-parasitological study on different NFS populations was performed on Medny Island in the Bering Sea (Yurakhno and Taikov, 1986; Yurakhno, 1998) (Fig. 1). However, despite the thousands of NFSs harvested annually on the Pribilof archipelago during the commercial harvests until 1984, extensive studies on helminths, including cestodes, were not performed. Our results represent the first comprehensive data on the diversity and ecology of cestodes of the NFSs from St. Paul Island identified to the species level. Therefore we cannot compare our current findings with any previous data collected in the Alaskan part of the Bering Sea, but only with data collected from other NFS populations in the North Pacific (Kovalenko, 1975; Yurakhno and Taikov, 1986; Yurakhno, 1998). The population studies of the NFSs in the North Pacific indicate that the seals from the Commander, Kuril and the Pribilof archipelago populations can freely mix on feeding sites (Arsenyev et al., 1973; Kajimura, 1980, 1984; Gentry, 1998; Sokolov et al., 1998). As the most of helminths parasitize NFSs, including cestodes, are transmitted through food webs (fish, crustacean or squids), using the same forage areas undoubtedly facilitates the exchange of parasites between different groups of seals as well as even phylogenetically unrelated hosts, such as other marine mammals and seabirds (Delyamure, 1955; Hoberg, 1995, 1996; Yurakhno, 1998; Hoberg and Adams, 2000).

The high prevalence of cestodes in NFSs (98.6%) observed in our study was similar to previous data obtained from the Commander archipelago (92.3–93.6%) provided by Yurakhno and Taikov (1986) and Yurakhno (1998). These authors also did not find any significant differences in prevalence of cestodes at different haul-outs, as was observed in the present study. The intensity of infection in our study was also extremely high (mean intensity 19.7 specimens per host) (Table 1), which was significantly higher than in previous reports in NFSs from the Commander archipelago (10.9) (Yurakhno and Taikov, 1986; Yurakhno, 1998). Moreover, the high intensity of NFS infection with cestodes was consistently observed during all 4 years of the study, and the intensity of infection significantly increased from 2011 to 2014. Probably this increase of cestode intensity in NFSs is affected by changes in the ecological and oceanographic conditions in the Bering Sea and North Pacific related to climate change in Arctic during the last decades (Benson and Trites, 2002; Hoberg et al., 2012). However, the short duration of our study does not allow us to draw a reliable conclusion. The intensity of the cestodes infections in other otariid species differs in others regions of the world (Hernández-Orts et al., 2013 and references therein) which may be associated with different seasons of the studies, as well as with variations in diet of these otariid species. Nevertheless, this is the highest intensity of cestode infections reported in otariids so far.

Life cycles of cestodes in pinnipeds are still unknown; however, we can assume that diphyllobothriids that parasitize NFSs have similar life cycles to other species from the genera Diphyllobothrium (Cobbold, 1858) or Diplogonoporus (Lönnberg, 1892), and that their first intermediate hosts are planctonic crustaceans (copepods), with marine fish serving as the second intermediate hosts (Delyamure et al., 1985; Kuchta et al., 2015). The life cycles of diphyllobothriids also may be extremely complex, with several additional paratenic or reservoir hosts, such as predatory fish that may accumulate plerocercoids in their body (Delyamure et al., 1985). Therefore, any changes in the cestode fauna as well as in other helminths transmitted through food chains are a reflection of changes in diet of the hosts. Recent studies on diet and feeding behavior of NFSs revealed significant changes in NFS diet during the last decades (Trites, 1992; Sinclair et al., 2008; Sterling, 2009). Significant decrease in NFS infection with anisakid nematodes and acanthocephalans was observed during the last 50 years (Kuzmina et al., 2012, 2014). We suggest that the biodiversity and ecology of diphyllobotriids also have changed over this time. Current tendencies of increasing intensity of NFSs infection with cestodes observed in our study also may support this assumption. Many ecological factors, including physical environmental conditions (climate changes, oceanic regimes), biotic and anthropogenic (commercial fisheries) factors influence marine food-webs in the Bering Sea and North Pacific (Sinclair et al., 2008). However, the absence of retrospective data from the eastern part of the North Pacific does not allow us to clarify these changes and associate them with changes in the prey availability and feeding behavior of the seals.

The tetrabothriids of the genus Anopryocephalus Baylis, 1922 are well known parasites of phocids and otariids with narrow host and geographic distribution at high latitudes of Holarctic Region (Hoberg and Adams, 1992). Anophryocephalus ochotensis Delamure et Krotov, 1955 was described from the Steller sea lion, Eumetopias jubatus and in the NFS was reported only once on the Kommandorskii Islands by Yurakhno (1987, 1998). In the present study, we found only few immature specimens tentatively identified as Anophryocephalus cf. ochotensis.

The finding of a large number of immature cestodes (69.7%) in the present study may correspond with recent infection of the NFSs, but most probably is caused by hyper-infection (“crowding effect”) that may delay the growth and development of these cestodes, as has been observed in other cestodes (Halvorsen and Andersen, 1974; Bush and Lotz, 2000; Roberts, 2000).

Detailed morphological studies have shown high variability in the shape and size of the scolex in diphyllobothriid cestodes, however their specific identification was possible based to the shape of the first segments and the presence of the neck (Fig. 3) (Hernández-Orts et al., 2015). This extreme variability may explain the previous records of additional diphyllobothriid tapeworms reported in NFSs (Delyamure, 1955; Dailey and Brownell, 1972; Margolis and Dailey, 1972; Yurakhno and Taikov, 1986; Yurakhno, 1998). However, we concluded that these four additional species identified in NFSs were dubious records (see Hernández-Orts et al., 2015).

We also proposed that D. violettae may represents a junior synonymy of D. tetrapterus, because the metrical data reported by Yurakhno (1986) overlap with the data obtained in the present study: body length (20–150; holotype of D. violettae 62 vs. D. tetrapterus 30 cm), scolex (1.21–1.88 × 1.18–1.57; 2.35 × 2.60 vs. 1.2 × 0.54 cm) and eggs (66–86 x 41–52; 64–80 × 42–58 vs. 43–46 × 33–40). Additionally, metrical data of D. violettae overlap with the data reported for D. tetrapterus by Margolis (1956) and Rausch (1964). These morphological characters are not useful to differentiate species of diphyllobothriid tapeworms as was shown recently for A. pacificus by Hernández-Orts et al. (2015). However, further studies with a combination of classical morphological and molecular methods are needed to clarify this issue.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The investigation was approved by the director of the University of Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station. This work was partially supported by the Czech Science Foundation (grant number P506/12/1632) and the Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences (grant number RVO: 60077344). J.S.H.O. benefited by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the General Directorate of Academic Staff Affairs (DGAPA), UNAM, Mexico.

References

  1. Afanasyev V.P. Parazitofauna promyslovykh mlekopitajuschikh Komandorskikh ostrovov. Uchenye zapiski LGU. Ser. Biol. 1941;74:93–117. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arsenyev V.A., Zemskij V.A., Studenetskaja I.S. Pischevaja Prom-st'; Moscow: 1973. Marine Mammals. [Morskie Mlekopitajuschie] p. 232. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  3. Atrashkevich G. Parasitology in XXI Century – Problems, Methods, Solutions. 2008. Spiny-headed worm genus Corynosoma Lühe, 1904 (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) in the Okhotsk sea and parasitic system with dominant species of C. strumosum (Rudolphi, 1819) pp. 38–42. Lema, St. Peterburg; in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  4. Benson A.J., Trites A.W. Ecological effects of regime shifts in the Bering Sea and eastern North Pacific Ocean. Fish Fish. 2002;3:95–113. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowman D.D., Lynn R.C. sixth ed. W.B. Saunders Company; Philadelphia, USA: 1995. Parasitology for Veterinarians; p. 430. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bush A.D., Lafferty K.D., Lotz J.M., Shostak A.W. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis, revised. J. Parasitol. 1997;84:575–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bush A.O., Lotz J.M. The ecology of “crowding”. J. Parasitol. 2000;86:212–213. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0212:TEOC]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cholodkovsky N.F. Cestodes nouveaux ou peu connus. Troisième série. Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petrograd. 1914;19:516–523. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chupakhina T.I. Helminth fauna of the fur seals from Tulenij island. Trudy AtlantNIRO. 1971;39:166–170. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dailey M.D., Brownell R.L.J. A checklist of mammal parasites. In: Ridgeway S.H., Springfield C.C.T., editors. Mammals of the Sea: Biology and Medicine. Thomas; Springfield: 1972. pp. 528–589. [Google Scholar]
  11. Delyamure S.L. AN USSR; Moscow, Russia: 1955. Helminthofauna of Marine Mammals (Ecology and Phylogeny) p. 518. [Google Scholar]
  12. Delyamure S.L. Ecological and geographical survey of helmintofauna of the northern fur seal. Helmintologia. 1961;3:73–79. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  13. Delyamure S.L., Skrjabin A.S., Serdukov A.M. vol. XI. Nauka; Moscow, Russia: 1985. p. 200. (Essentials of Cestodology. Diphyllobothriata – Flatworm Parasites of Man, Mammals and Birds). in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gentry R.L. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ: 1998. Behavior and Ecology of the Northern Fur Seal; p. 392. [Google Scholar]
  15. Halvorsen O., Andersen K. Some effects of population density in infections of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (Nitzsch) in golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus Waterhouse) and common gull (Larus canus L.) Parasitology. 1974;69:149–160. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000047995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hammer Ǿ., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Paleontol. Electron. 2001;4:9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm [Google Scholar]
  17. Hernández-Orts J.S., Montero F.E., Juan-García A., García N.A., Crespo E.A., Raga J.A. Intestinal helminth fauna of the South American sea lion Otaria flavescens and fur seal Arctocephalus australis from northern Patagonia, Argentina. J. Helminthol. 2013;87:336–347. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X12000454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hernández-Orts J.S., Scholz T., Brabec J., Kuzmina T., Kuchta R. Unexpected morphological plasticity and global geographical distribution of the Pacific human tapeworm Adenocephalus pacificus (syn. Diphyllobothrium pacificum): molecular and morphological survey. Acta Trop. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.05.017. (accepted) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoberg E.P. Historical biogeography and modes of speciation across high latitude seas of the Holarctic: concepts for host-parasite coevolution among Phocini (Phocidae) and Tetrabothriidae (Eucestoda) Can. J. Zool. 1995;73:45–57. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoberg E.P. Faunal diversity among avian parasite assemblages: the interaction of history, ecology, and biogeography in marine systems. Bull. Scand. Soc. Parasitol. 1996;6:65–89. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoberg E.P., Adams A. Phylogeny and historical biogeography and ecology of Anophryocephalus spp. (Eucestoda: Tetrabothriidae) among pinnipeds of the Holarctic during the late Tertiary and Pleistocene. Can. J. Zool. 1992;70:703–719. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoberg E.P., Adams A.M. Phylogeny, history and biodiversity: understanding faunal structure and biogeography in the marine realm. Bull. Scand. Soc. Parasitol. 2000;10:19–37. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoberg E.P., Galbreath T.O., Cook J.A., Kutz S.J., Polley L. Northern host-parasite assemblages: history and biogeography on the borderlands of episodic climate and environ-mental transition. Adv. Parasitol. 2012;79:1–97. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-398457-9.00001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ionita M., Varela M.G., Lyons E.T., Spraker T.R., Tolliver S.C. Hookworms (Uncinaria lucasi) and acanthocephalans (Corynosoma spp. and Bolbosoma spp.) found in dead northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) on St. Paul Island, Alaska in 2007. Parasitol. Res. 2008;103:1025–1029. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1087-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kajimura H. Distribution and migration of northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) in the eastern Pacific. In: Kajimura H., Lander R.H., Perez M.A., York A.E., Bigg M.A., editors. Further Analysis of Pelagic Fur Seal Data Collected by the United States and Canada During 1958–74. NOAA/NMFS/NMML; Seattle: 1980. pp. 4–19. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kajimura H. 1984. Opportunistic feeding of the northern fur seal, Callorhinus ursinus, in the Eastern North Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Rep., NMFS SSRF-779, 49 p. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kamo H. Gendai Kikaku; Tokyo, Japan: 1999. Guide to Identification of Diphyllobothriid Cestodes; p. 146. in Japanese. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kamo H., Maejima J., Yazaki S., Fukumoto S. Notes on morphology and taxonomy of the genus Diphyllobothrium found from some marine mammals in Japanese environs. J. Yonago Med. Assoc. 1982;33:261–270. in Japanese. [Google Scholar]
  29. Keyes M.C. US Dep. Inter., US Fish. Wildl. Serv., Mar. Mamm. Biol. Lab.; Seattle, Washington, USA: 1964. Research in Fur Seal Mortality, St. Paul Island, Alaska. 8 July to 24 September 1963; p. 66. [Google Scholar]
  30. Keyes M.C. Pathology of the northern fur seal. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1965;147:1090–1095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kovalenko L.M. vol. 1. Naukova Dumka; Kiev: 1975. Helminth fauna of otariidae inhabiting the Kuril Islands; pp. 137–139. (Marine Mammals: Proceedings of the VI All-Union Council on the study of marine mammals (Kiev, October, 1975)). in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  32. Krotov A.I., Delyamure S.L. Some aspects of the parasitic worm fauna of mammals and birds of the URSS. Tr. Gelmintol. Lab. 1952;6:278–292. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuchta R., Caira J.N. Three new species of Echinobothrium (Cestoda: Diphyllidae) from Indo-Pacific stingrays of the genus Pastinachus (Rajiformes: Dasyatidae) Folia Parastiol. 2010;57:185–196. doi: 10.14411/fp.2010.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kuchta R., Scholz T., Brabec J., Wicht B. Chapter 17. Diphyllobothrium, Diplogonoporus and Spirometra. In: Xiao L., Ryan U., Feng F., editors. Biology of Foodborne Parasites. Section III Important Foodborne Helminths. CRC Press; Boca Raton, Florida: 2015. pp. 299–326. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kuzmina T.A., Lisitsyna O.I., Lyons E.T., Spraker T.R., Tolliver S.C. Acanthocephalans in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) and a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) on St. Paul Island, Alaska: species, prevalence, and biodiversity in four fur seal subpopulations. Parasitol. Res. 2012;111:1049–1058. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-2930-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuzmina T.A., Lyons E.T., Spraker T.R. Anisakids (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from stomachs of northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) on St. Paul Island, Alaska: parasitological and pathological analysis. Parasitol. Res. 2014;113:4463–4470. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4131-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lyons E.T., Spraker T.R., Olson K.D., Tolliver S.C., Bair H.D. Prevalence of hookworms (Uncinaria lucasi Stiles) in northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus Linnaeus) pups on St. Paul Island, Alaska, USA: 1986–1999. Comp. Parasitol. 2000;67:218–223. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lyons E.T., Delong R.L., Spraker T.R., Melin S.R., Tolliver S.C. Observations in 2001 on hookworms (Uncinaria spp.) in otariid pinnipeds. Parasitol. Res. 2003;89:503–505. doi: 10.1007/s00436-002-0784-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lyons E.T., Spraker T.R., De Long R.L., Ionita M., Melin S.R., Nadler S.A. Review of research on hookworms (Uncinaria lucasi Stiles, 1901) in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus Linnaeus, 1758) Parasitol. Res. 2011;109:257–265. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2420-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Machida M. Parasites of the northern fur seal and their relationship to the breeding islands. Proc. Jpn. Soc. Syst. Zool. 1969;5:16–17. in Japanese. [Google Scholar]
  41. Margolis L. Parasitic helminths and arthropods from pinnipedia of the Canadian Pacific coast. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 1956;13:489–505. [Google Scholar]
  42. Margolis L., Dailey M.D. Revised annotated list of parasites from sea mammals caught off the west coast of North America. Fish. Ser. Rep. 1972;647:1–23. [Google Scholar]
  43. Markowski S. The cestodes of pinnipeds in the Arctic and other regions. J. Helminthol. 1952;26:171–214. [Google Scholar]
  44. Nybelin O. Säugetier- und Vogelcestoden von Juan Fernandez. In: Skottsberg C., editor. vol. III. Almqvist & Wiksell; Uppsala, Sweden: 1931. pp. 493–523. (The Natural History of Juan Fernandez and Easter Island, Zoology). [Google Scholar]
  45. Olsen O.W., Lyons E.T. Life cycle of the hookworm Uncinaria lucasi Stiles of the northern fur seals, Callorhinus ursinus on the Pribilof Islands in the Bering Sea. J. Parasitol. 1962;48(Suppl.):42–43. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rausch R.L. Studies on the helminth fauna of Alaska. XLI. Observations on cestodes of the genus Diplogonoporus Lönnberg, 1892 (Diphyllobothriidae) Can. J. Zool. 1964;42:1049–1069. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rausch R.L., Adams A.M., Margolis L. Identity of Diphyllobothrium spp. (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae) from sea lions and people along the Pacific coast of South America. J. Parasitol. 2010;96:359–365. doi: 10.1645/GE-2257.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ream R. 2008. Northern fur seal research in Alaska, National Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Ecosystems Program, Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Quarterly Research Reports, Oct.–Dec. 2008: 1. [Google Scholar]
  49. Reiczigel J. Confidence intervals for the binomial parameter: some new considerations. Stat. Med. 2003;22:611–621. doi: 10.1002/sim.1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rózsa L., Reiczigel J., Majoros G. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. J. Parasitol. 2000;86:228–232. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0228:QPISOH]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Roberts L.S. The crowding effect revisited. J. Parasitol. 2000;86:209–211. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0209:TCER]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Scheffer V.B., Fiscus C.H., Todd E.I. 1984. History of Scientific Study and Management of the Alaskan Fur Seal, Callorhinus ursinus, 1786–1964. NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF-780, 70 pp. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sinclair E.H., Vlietstra L.S., Johnson D.S., Zeppelin T.K., Byrd G.V., Springer A.M. Patterns in prey use among fur seals and seabirds in the Pribilof Islands. Deep-Sea Res. II. 2008;55:1897–1918. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sokolov V.E., Aristov A.A., Lisitzina T.U., editors. The Northern Fur Seal: Systematic, Morphology, Ecology, Behavior (1998) Nauka; Moscow: 1998. p. 942. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sterling J.T. 2009. Northern fur seal foraging behaviors, food webs, and interactions with oceanographic features in the eastern Bering Sea. PhD Thesis, University of Washington. 209 pp. [Google Scholar]
  56. Stiles C.W., Hassall A. Internal parasites of the fur seal, Chapter VII. In: Jordan D.S., editor. The Fur Seals and Fur-Seal Islands of the North Pacific Ocean, Part 3. US Government Printing Office; Washington, DC: 1899. pp. 99–177. [Google Scholar]
  57. Stunkard H.W. Pseudophyllidean cestodes from Alaskan pinnipeds. J. Parasitol. 1948;34:211–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Trites A.W. Northern fur seals: why have they declined? Aquat. Mamm. 1992;18:3–18. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wardle R.A., McLeod J.A., Stewart I.E. Lühe's “Diphyllobothrium” (Cestoda) J. Parasitol. 1947;33:319–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yamaguti S. Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan: part 47. Cestodes of marine mammals and birds. Acta Med. Okayama. 1951;7:307–316. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yurakhno M.V. New species of cestodes Diplogonoporus violettae sp. n., (Cestoda, Diphyllobothriidae), a parasite of Eumetopias jubatus Schreb. from the Bering sea. Parazitologiya. 1986;20:39–45. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yurakhno M.V. Study of the population structure of the northern fur seals. In: Gaevskaja A.V., editor. Parazitologiia i patologiia morskikh organizmov. Tezisy Dokladov IV Vsesojuznogo Simpoziuma, 21–23 April, 1987. USSR; Kaliningrad: 1987. pp. 144–145. Aplantichaskij nauchno-isskedovatelskii institut rybnogo khoziaistva i okeanigrafii. (in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  63. Yurakhno M.V. Diseases and parasites. In: Sokolov V.E., Aristov A.A., Lisitzina T.U., editors. The Northern Fur Seal: Systematic, Morphology, Ecology, Behavior. Nauka; Moscow, Russia: 1998. pp. 810–899. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yurakhno M.V., Taikov I.M. Study, Protection and Management of Marine Mammals. Proceedings of the 9th All-Union Conference. The Ministry of Fisheries of the USSR; Arkhangelsk: 1986. Some preliminary results of parasitological autopsies of Commander seals in 1984–1985; pp. 435–436. in Russian. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES