Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2015 Jun 12;59(7):4318–4320. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04918-14

Differential Roles of Antimicrobials in the Acquisition of Drug Resistance through Activation of the SOS Response in Acinetobacter baumannii

Luis M Jara a, Pilar Cortés a, Germán Bou b, Jordi Barbé a, Jesús Aranda a,
PMCID: PMC4468734  PMID: 25896685

Abstract

The effect of antimicrobials on SOS-mediated mutagenesis induction depends on the bacterial species and the antimicrobial group. In this work, we studied the effect of different families of antimicrobial agents used in clinical therapy against Acinetobacter baumannii in the induction of mutagenesis in this multiresistant Gram-negative pathogen. The data showed that ciprofloxacin and tetracycline induce SOS-mediated mutagenesis, whereas colistin and meropenem, which are extensively used in clinical therapy, do not.

TEXT

Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the main infectious nosocomial agents that lead to sporadic outbreaks and multidrug-resistant strains worldwide (1). The factors contributing to high-level antimicrobial resistance include the acquisition of mutations and gain of genetic determinants (2). The SOS system mediates a transitory response to DNA damage, during which bacteria can introduce changes in their genomes, acquiring phenotypic characteristics that potentiate adaptation to changing environments (35).

Antimicrobials may cause genetic changes mediated by the SOS response. Previous studies showed that the UmuDAb regulon, encoding several error-prone DNA polymerase V subunits, is an important component of the SOS response and mutagenesis in A. baumannii (68). Point mutations in the bacterial genome caused by these error-prone DNA polymerases can result in the acquisition of drug resistance. For instance, in A. baumannii, point mutations in the genes rpoB and pmrB confer resistance to rifampin and colistin, respectively (6, 9). Activation of the SOS response and the induction of mutagenesis by subinhibitory doses of antimicrobials have been demonstrated in several bacterial species, such as Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus species (10). Given the clinical importance of multidrug-resistant strains of A. baumannii in nosocomial infections, especially in intensive care units, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between different groups of common therapeutic antimicrobials and their ability to induce both the SOS response and mutagenesis in this pathogen.

As cited above, subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics promote genetic variation by increasing the rates of mutations through activation of the SOS system. Some of these antimicrobials, such as quinolones, trigger the SOS response as a consequence of their direct action on DNA (11). Moreover, the induction of SOS can be also caused by antimicrobials that do not directly lead to DNA damage, i.e., β-lactams; instead, induction is attributed to the generation of reactive oxygen species (12, 13). In addition, the mutagenic response to a given antimicrobial may be different depending on both the antimicrobial group and the bacterial species. For instance, in E. coli, quinolones and β-lactams (excluding carbapenems) are able to increase both SOS gene expression and mutagenesis, whereas other antibiotics, such as tetracycline, do not (11, 13, 14). However, tetracycline induces SOS genes and mutagenesis in V. cholerae, although to a lower degree than that by quinolones (14).

A. baumannii contains multiple umuDC operons and unlinked umuC and umuD genes, all of which encode components of error-prone DNA polymerase V (6). In A. baumannii strain ATCC 17978, the induction of these components after DNA damage leads to the introduction of point mutations in the bacterial genome, including those able to generate antibiotic resistance (7, 8). Previous studies showed that the umuD and umuC genes of A. baumannii are induced by ciprofloxacin, which is also a strong inducer of the SOS response (6). To assess the effect of the main antimicrobial therapies used in the treatment of infections by this multidrug-resistant pathogen, and, specifically, the role of these antimicrobials in the generation of antibiotic resistance, we studied the effects of meropenem and colistin with respect to their ability to induce genes encoding components of the error-prone DNA polymerase V in A. baumannii, comparing these drugs with ciprofloxacin, a known SOS inducer, and with tetracycline, which induces both SOS genes and mutagenesis in V. cholerae but not in E. coli (11, 14).

In accordance with the methodology used in most studies of chemical compound-induced mutagenesis (15, 16), the effect of temporary exposure (2 h) of bacteria to the selected antibiotics (meropenem, colistin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline) was analyzed. It has been established that in this kind of study, the most efficient method is to obtain a high frequency of mutants with low lethality (17). For this reason, the maximal antimicrobial concentration producing no more than a 50% reduction in A. baumannii viability after 2 h of treatment (MC2h) was determined for each antibiotic (Fig. 1A).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

(A) MC2h of the antimicrobials used in this study, tested on A. baumannii ATCC 17978. (B) Expression of the genes A1S_0636, A1S_1174, A1S_1389, A1S_2008, and A1S_2015 (encoding components of error-prone DNA polymerase V [8]) in cultures of A. baumannii ATCC 17978 treated with MC2h of the indicated antimicrobial (COL, colistin; MP, meropenem; TET, tetracycline; CIP, ciprofloxacin) compared to expression in nontreated cultures. The mRNA level of each gene was determined by comparison with a standard curve generated by the amplification of an internal fragment of the A. baumannii gyrB gene. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the mean values from at least two independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate. A value of ≥2 (indicated by the black arrow) was considered induction. See Aranda et al. for the primer sequences (8).

The effect of the MC2h of the selected antimicrobials on the induction of umuDC gene expression in A. baumannii ATCC 17978 was analyzed. To do so, a saturated culture of the bacterium was diluted 1:20 in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (100 ml) and incubated at 37°C until the mid-exponential phase of growth was reached (optical density at 600 nm, ∼0.6; ∼108 CFU/ml). At this time, 10-ml aliquots were removed from the culture and treated with the MC2h of the antimicrobial (with the exception of the negative control). After an additional 2 h of incubation at 37°C, the cultures were harvested for RNA extraction by centrifugation. The cells were then resuspended in Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer and treated with 50 mg/ml lysozyme for 10 min at 37°C. Total RNA was subsequently extracted using an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen). DNA contaminants were removed from the RNA by digestion with DNase Turbo (Ambion). Gene expression was determined by reverse transcription-quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) using the LightCycler RNA master SYBR green I (Roche) on a LightCycler 480 instrument (LC480) (Roche), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Specific oligonucleotides (Roche) were used to quantify the genes encoding error-prone DNA polymerase components belonging to the UmuDAb regulon of A. baumannii: A1S_0636, A1S_1174, A1S_1389, A1S_2008, and A1S_2015 (8). The relative mRNA concentration obtained from the genes studied was determined according to a standard curve generated by amplifying an internal fragment of the gyrB gene, which does not belong to the SOS regulon (8). The expression factor was calculated as the ratio between the mRNA concentration of the genes expressed in the treated cultures versus that from the untreated culture (8). The results showed that genes encoding components of the error-prone DNA polymerase V of A. baumannii were induced by either ciprofloxacin or tetracycline but not by meropenem or colistin (Fig. 1B). The dinB gene, which is not induced in A. baumannii after DNA damage (6), was used as the negative control in all antimicrobial treatments. As expected, there was no increase in the expression of this gene in response to any of the treatments (data not shown).

Rifampin resistance can be acquired through genomic point mutations, most commonly following DNA base pair substitutions in the rpoB gene, which encodes the β-subunit of RNA polymerase. We recently demonstrated that inactivation of any of the umuD genes present in the genome of A. baumannii ATCC 17978 significantly decreases its ability to generate DNA damage-induced mutants (7). To measure the capacity of the antimicrobials tested in this study to induce mutagenesis in A. baumannii, we used an established rifampin resistance assay for this bacterial species (6). Briefly, a saturated culture of A. baumannii ATCC 17978 was diluted 1:20 in LB and incubated under the above-described conditions. At the mid-exponential phase of growth, 10 ml of culture was supplemented (with the exception of the negative control) with the MC2h of ciprofloxacin, colistin, meropenem, or tetracycline. After 2 h of incubation, the cultures were washed twice with 0.9% (wt/vol) saline, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 × g. The pellets were resuspended with fresh LB broth and incubated for 24 h at 37°C with shaking at 150 rpm. Appropriate cell dilutions were plated on LB agar with and without 50 μg/ml rifampin to assess the number of resistant mutants and the total number of CFU, respectively. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 h. The mutation frequency was calculated by dividing the number of resistant mutants by the total number of CFU. As shown in Fig. 2, there was a clear correlation between the increased expression of several umuDC genes and the increase in mutagenesis, which might be explained by the direct action of the error-prone DNA polymerase V (encoded by the umuDC genes) in the generation of antibiotic resistance, including to rifampin, as we recently demonstrated (7). Specifically, mutagenesis increased significantly after the treatment of A. baumannii cultures with the MC2h of either ciprofloxacin or tetracycline (P < 0.01), whereas the induction of mutagenesis was not augmented in response to the MC2h of either meropenem or colistin (Fig. 2). In conclusion, the results reported in this work provide additional support for the use of meropenem and colistin in the treatment of A. baumannii infections, since neither drug triggers SOS-mediated mutagenesis in this multiresistant nosocomial pathogen.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Frequency of the occurrence of rifampin-resistant mutants in A. baumannii ATCC 17978 cultures treated with MC2h of the indicated drug (COL, colistin; MP, meropenem; TET, tetracycline; CIP, ciprofloxacin). C−, negative control. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the mean of the results from 10 independently tested cultures. The data were analyzed by a two-tailed one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey test for post hoc multiple group comparisons. *, P < 0.01 compared to the nontreated A. baumannii strain (ATCC 17978).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by grants BFU2011-23478 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España and 2014SGR572 from the Generalitat de Catalunya.

We acknowledge the efforts of Joan Ruiz (UAB) and Susana Escribano (UAB) for their excellent technical assistance. We also thank Marta Arch, Jordi Corral, and María Pérez, undergraduate and postgraduate UAB students, for their helpful support.

We declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Antunes LC, Visca P, Towner KJ. 2014. Acinetobacter baumannii: evolution of a global pathogen. Pathog Dis 71:292–301. doi: 10.1111/2049-632X.12125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vila J, Pachón J. 2012. Therapeutic options for Acinetobacter baumannii infections: an update. Expert Opin Pharmacother 13:2319–2336. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.729820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blázquez J, Couce A, Rodríguez-Beltrán J, Rodríguez-Rojas A. 2012. Antimicrobials as promoters of genetic variation. Curr Opin Microbiol 15:561–569. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guerin E, Cambray G, Sanchez-Alberola N, Campoy S, Erill I, Da Re S, Gonzalez-Zorn B, Barbé J, Ploy MC, Mazel D. 2009. The SOS response controls integron recombination. Science 324:1034. doi: 10.1126/science.1172914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baharoglu Z, Mazel D. 2014. SOS, the formidable strategy of bacteria against aggressions. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:1126–1145. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Norton MD, Spilkia AJ, Godoy VG. 2013. Antibiotic resistance acquired through a DNA damage-inducible response in Acinetobacter baumannii. J Bacteriol 195:1335–1345. doi: 10.1128/JB.02176-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aranda J, Lopez M, Leiva E, Magan A, Adler B, Bou G, Barbé J. 2014. Role of Acinetobacter baumannii UmuD homologs in antibiotic resistance acquired through DNA damage-induced mutagenesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:1771–1773. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02346-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aranda J, Poza M, Shingu-Vazquez M, Cortes P, Boyce JD, Adler B, Barbé J, Bou G. 2013. Identification of a DNA-damage-inducible regulon in Acinetobacter baumannii. J Bacteriol 195:5577–5582. doi: 10.1128/JB.00853-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Beceiro A, Llobet E, Aranda J, Bengoechea JA, Doumith M, Hornsey M, Dhanji H, Chart H, Bou G, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2011. Phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A in colistin-resistant variants of Acinetobacter baumannii mediated by the pmrAB two-component regulatory system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3370–3379. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00079-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Laureti L, Matic I, Gutierrez A. 2013. Bacterial responses and genome instability induced by sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. Antibiotics 2:100–114. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics2010100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Briales A, Rodriguez-Martinez JM, Velasco C, Machuca J, Diaz de Alba P, Blazquez J, Pascual A. 2012. Exposure to diverse antimicrobials induces the expression of qnrB1, qnrD and smaqnr genes by SOS-dependent regulation. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2854–2859. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Hayete B, Lawrence CA, Collins JJ. 2007. A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell 130:797–810. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miller C, Thomsen LE, Gaggero C, Mosseri R, Ingmer H, Cohen SN. 2004. SOS response induction by beta-lactams and bacterial defense against antibiotic lethality. Science 305:1629–1631. doi: 10.1126/science.1101630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baharoglu Z, Mazel D. 2011. Vibrio cholerae triggers SOS and mutagenesis in response to a wide range of antibiotics: a route towards multiresistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2438–2441. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01549-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matsushima T, Matsumoto H, Shirai A, Sawamura M, Sugimura T. 1979. Mutagenicity of the naturally occurring carcinogen cycasin and synthetic methylazoxymethanol conjugates in Salmonella Typhimurium. Cancer Res 39:3780–3782. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ames BN, Durston WE, Yamasaki E, Lee FD. 1973. Carcinogens are mutagens: a simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 70:2281–2285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.8.2281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barbour L, Hanna M, Xiao W. 2006. Mutagenesis. Methods Mol Biol. 313:121–127. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-958-3:121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES