Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Surf Sci. 2015 Jul 15;343:166–171. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.014

Ionization of covalent immobilized poly(4-vinylphenol) monolayers measured by ellipsometry, QCM and SPR

Suji Uppalapati a, Na Kong b, Oscar Norberg b, Olof Ramström b,*, Mingdi Yan a,b,*
PMCID: PMC4469237  NIHMSID: NIHMS678410  PMID: 26097271

Abstract

Covalently immobilized poly(4-vinylphenol) (PVP) monolayer films were fabricated by spin coating PVP on perfluorophenyl azide (PFPA)-functionalized surface followed by UV irradiation. The pH-responsive behavior of these PVP ultrathin films was evaluated by ellipsometry, quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). By monitoring the responses of these films to pH in situ, the ionization constant of the monolayer thin films was obtained. The apparent pKa value of these covalently immobilized PVP monolayers, 13.4 by SPR, was 3 units higher than that of the free polymer in aqueous solution.

Keywords: Poly(4-vinylphenol), Monolayer, Perfluorophenyl azide, pH response, Ionization constant

1. Introduction

Smart polymers [14], also known as environmentally sensitive [5] stimuli responsive [6,7] or intelligent polymers [8], undergo large and sharp property changes with small or modest changes in environmental conditions. Through the introduction of structural features and functional groups, polymer responses can be selectively controlled with changes in chemical (e.g., pH, salt concentration), physical (e.g., temperature, electromagnetic radiation, mechanical stress), or biochemical (e.g., antigen, enzyme, ligand) stimuli. In some cases, polymers are constructed in such a way that they can respond to multiple stimuli input [9,10]. The polymer output response may be swelling or collapsing, surface energy changes (hydrophilic to hydrophobic, and vice versa), drug release, conformational changes, dissolution or precipitation, and changes in physical properties such as optical and electrical parameters. These changes can be readily evaluated by sensitive analytical techniques such as ellipsometry, chemical force microscopy, light or fluorescence microscopy, QCM, and SPR. Polymer thin films having responsive surfaces have demonstrated a wide range of applications such as drug delivery, separation, sensors, and microscale actuators [811]. Over the past few decades, the need for new chemical and biological applications such as pH sensors, controlled drug/gene delivery, personal care, industrial coatings, oil exploration, enzyme immobilization, chemo-mechanical systems that require “smart” functional materials has rapidly fueled the research development in pH-responsive polymers [1215].

Polymer thin films can be generated by casting, dipping or spin coating a polymer solution on a solid substrate. Without covalent bonding between the polymer and the substrate, the polymer films are held to the surface by physisorption through non-covalent forces such as hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, and dipole interactions. These forces are often weak, unlike the more robust and stable covalent binding which attaches polymers firmly to the surface. Covalently immobilized polymer films can be fabricated by either graft-to or graft-from methods. The graft-to method uses a functionalized polymer, which reacts with the substrate to form covalent bonds [16,17]. The graft-from method starts with a substrate that is functionalized with either a monomer or initiator. in situ polymerization generates polymer films directly on the surface with a relatively higher grafting density [1820].

Poly(4-vinylphenol) (PVP) is a weakly acidic polymer which releases protons in alkaline solutions. PVP has found a variety of applications, for example, as photoresist materials in semiconductor industries [21,22], as substitute for water resistive wood adhesive [23], as dielectric materials for energy storage [24,25], and for enzyme recognition by altering polymer surface with biomolecule [26]. Very few studies were dedicated towards characterizing responsive behavior of PVP ultrathin films to external environmental factors [2730], and there have been no reported studies on the pH swelling behavior of PVP.

We have developed a simple method to photochemically immobilize polymer thin films on a substrate [3135]. The method utilized heterobifunctional perfluorophenylazide (PFPA) derivatives as coupling agents to allow for the covalent attachment of polymers to substrate surface by way of the CH insertion reaction of the photochemically generated perfluorophenyl nitrene [36]. In this case, the polymer does not need to be chemically derivatized in advance and can be used in its native form. In this work, we fabricated PVP thin films by spin coating PVP solution onto the PFPA-functionalized silicon wafer followed by UV irradiation to covalently attach a monolayer of PVP film to the wafer surface. The pH responsive behavior of the PVP thin films was studied by ellipsometry, QCM and SPR. The apparent pKa value of the immobilized PVP thin films was estimated.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Poly(4-vinylphenol) (Mw ca. 20,000), methyl pentafluorobenzoate, sodium azide (99%), N-hydroxysuccinimide (98%), 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (97%), calcium hydride (90-95%) were used as received from Aldrich. 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDAC) was purchased from TCI America (Portland, OR). 2-Propanol (99.9% ACS certified), ethyl acetate (99.9%, HPLC grade), n-butanol (99.4%, ACS certified), acetone (HPLC grade), ethyl ether anhydrous (99.9%, ACS certified), methanol (99.9%, HPLC grade), hexane (99.9%, HPLC grade), chloroform (99.9%, HPLC grade), hydrogen peroxide (30 wt.%, ACS certified), toluene (99.9%, ACS certified) were purchased from Fisher Scientific and were used as received. Ethanol (95%) was obtained from Aaper Alcohol and Chemical Co. (Shelbyville, KY). Water used was obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q system with at least 18.2 MΩ resistivity. Methylene chloride (DCM, 99.9%, HPLC grade, Fischer Scientific) was distilled from CaH2 and stored under nitrogen. Silica gel (mesh size 100–200), sodium hydroxide (98.1%, ACS certified), sodium phosphate tribasic (98.9%, ACS certified), sodium chlo-ride (ACS certified) were used as received from Fisher Scientific. Sodium phosphate monobasic and sodium phosphate dibasic anhydrous were obtained from Mallinckrodt Chemical Works (St. Louis, MO). Sodium sulfate, anhydrous (99%) was acquired from EMD Chemicals (Gibbstown, NJ). Ammonium hydroxide (29.3% NH3) was obtained from J.T. Baker Chemical Co. (Phillips-burg, NJ). CDCl3 with 1% v/v TMS (99.8%) was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (Andover, MA). Silicon wafers with a native oxide layer of 10–20Å were purchased from WaferNet, Inc. (San Jose, CA). A 280-nm long path optical filter was acquired from Schott glass technologies, Inc. (Elmsford, NY). Gold-plated quartz crystals (10 MHz) were purchased from Attana Sensor Technologies (Stockholm, Sweden). N-(3-Trimethoxysilylpropyl)-4-azido-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzamide (PFPA-silane) [37] and 2, 2’-dithioethyl bis(4-azido 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzoate) (PFPA-disulfide) [33,38] were synthesized according to previously developed procedures. The purified compounds were confirmed by 1H NMR acquired on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer.

2.2. Covalent immobilization of PVP thin films

Silicon wafers (1 cm × 1 cm) were cleaned with piranha solution (7:3 v/v 98% sulfuric acid/35% hydrogen peroxide) for 1.5 h at 80-90 °C (Caution: care should be taken when handling the piranha solution as it reacts violently with organic compounds). The wafers were then washed thoroughly with boiling water for 1 h and dried under a stream of nitrogen. The cleaned wafers were soaked overnight in the solution of PFPA-silane in toluene (1.5 mg/mL), and the samples were rinsed thoroughly in toluene for several times and dried under nitrogen. These wafers were then cured for 24 h at ambient conditions. A solution of PVP in ethyl acetate (10 mg/mL) was spin coated on a P6204 spin-coater (Specialty Coating Systems, Indianapolis, IN) at 2000 rpm for 60 s onto the cured wafers. The spin coated samples were then exposed to a 450-W medium-pressure Hg lamp (Hanovia, ACE Glass Incorporated, Vineland, NJ) in the presence of a 280-nm optical filter on the samples for 5 min under ambient conditions. The intensity of the lamp at the sample location was measured to be 2.5 mW/cm2 using a 254-nm sensor. The 5 min irradiation time includes a 2 min warm-up of the lamp to reach its full intensity. The irradiated samples were left in ethyl acetate for 5 h to remove the unbound polymer film and then dried in a stream of nitrogen.

2.3. Treatment of PVP films with solutions of varying pH

The pH-responsive studies were carried out in two different types of solutions including 10 mM phosphate buffer and diluted NaOH solutions. Phosphate buffer solutions of varying pH were prepared by varying the mass ratio of any of the two phosphate salts (Na2HPO4, NaH2PO4, and Na3PO4) in 100 mL of water. The NaOH solutions of varying pH were prepared by diluting the NaOH solution with water. The NaOH solutions were used immediately after they were prepared. The PVP thin films were soaked in a solution of varying pH (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13) for 5 min, and dried in a stream of nitrogen.

2.4. Ellipsometry measurements

Film thicknesses were measured on a Gaertner model L116A ellipsometer with He/Ne laser at an incident angle of 70°, and were also made on model LSE Stokes ellipsometer (Gaertner Scientific Corporation, Skokie, IL) with 6328Å He/Ne laser measuring beam at a 70° incidence angle. Refractive index values of 1.465 (SiO2), 1.600 (PVP), 1.503 (PFPA-silane) were used to determine the film thicknesses. The final film thickness value was obtained by taking average of three readings on different sample surface.

2.5. QCM measurements

Samples for QCM studies were prepared on gold-plated 10 MHz quartz crystals. The surface of the crystals were initially cleaned by immersing into a mixture of 1:1:3 v/v/v hydrogen peroxide (30%), ammonium hydroxide (29.3%) and distilled water, and heating at 80 °C for 5 min. The cleaned crystals were thoroughly rinsed several times in distilled water and dried under a stream of nitrogen. The cleaned crystals were soaked in a 14 mM solution of PFPA-disulfide in distilled dichloromethane (DCM) at room temperature in the dark overnight following a previously reported method [33]. The crystals were rinsed several times with DCM to remove excess PFPA-disulfide and dried in a stream of nitrogen. A solution of PVP in ethyl acetate (10 mg/mL) was spin coated at 2000 rpm for 60 s onto the PFPA-functionalized crystals. The samples were then UV irradiated for 5 min in the presence of 280-nm optical filter with 450 W medium pressure mercury lamp. Finally, the samples were soaked in ethyl acetate for 5 h to remove the un-attached polymer and dried in a stream of nitrogen. The crystals were mounted in the flow-through QCM system on an Attana 100 instrument (Attana sensor technologies, Stockholm, Sweden), and the solution flow rate was controlled at 150 μL/min. Measurements were taken after 30 s of exposure to the buffer solution (10 mM) of desired pH. The solution was then switched to pH 7 phosphate buffer to “condition” the sample before the next buffer solution was introduced. The frequency data were collected at ambient temperature.

2.6. SPR measurements

Gold substrates used for SPR measurements are 18 × 18 mm SF 10 glass slides, onto which 2 mm thick Ti followed by 45 nm thick gold films were deposited using an electron beam evaporator. Immediately before the fabrication of PVP films, the gold-coated SPR chips were cleaned in the piranha solution for 30 s. The substrates were then thoroughly washed with boiling water 3 times for 20 min each, and dried under a stream of nitrogen. The gold-coated SPR chips were soaked in a solution of PFPA-disulfide in ethanol (5.1 mM) for 3 h, rinsed thoroughly with ethanol to remove excess PFPA-disulfide and dried in a stream of nitrogen [33,38]. A solution of PVP in ethyl acetate (10 mg/mL) was spin coated at 2000 rpm for 60 s onto the PFPA-functionalized SPR chips. UV irradiation was executed on an OAI 200 mask aligner (OAI, San Jose, CA) using a 260-nm Hg/Xe UV lamp for 50 s. The intensity of the lamp at the sample location was measured to be 34 mW/cm2 using a 260-nm light sensor. The irradiated samples were soaked in ethyl acetate for 5 h to remove the unbound polymer. SPR experiments were performed using an SPR imager II (GWC technologies, Madison, WI), and data were acquired using the associated software. During the SPR experiments, the sample chip was first treated with the running buffer (pH 7) until a stable baseline was reached. The buffer solutions with varying pH were then introduced sequentially. Data were acquired after the signals were stabilized, which normally took 2–8 min. The flow rate was maintained at 100 μL/min throughout the experiment.

3. Results

Covalent immobilized PVP thin films were fabricated following the procedures shown in Scheme 1a. Silicon wafers were first treated with PFPA-silane to introduce PFPA on the wafer surface. PVP was then spin-coated on the surface followed by irradiating using a medium pressure Hg lamp. Irradiation of PVP by deep UV results in the formation of quinone-type structures [39], which are no longer electrolytes and would not have pH responsive properties. Deep UV would also crosslink the polymer [39,40]. To avoid these issues, a 280-nm optical filter was placed on the PVP films during irradiation to remove the deep UV from the light source. The covalent immobilization of PVP was accomplished through CH insertion of the photogenerated singlet perfluorophenyl nitrene to the adjacent polymer chains [31,37,41]. A final solvent extraction in ethyl acetate removed the unbound polymer, after which the PVP thin film remained covalently attached to the wafer surface. The thickness of the films was measured by ellipsometry to be 3.8 ± 0.1 nm. This is consistent with the immobilization chemistry that only the polymer chains in close proximity of the surface PFPA groups would be attached. The un-reacted polymer was removed by solvent extraction, leaving only a monolayer of the polymer on the surface.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Photochemical immobilization of PVP thin films on (a) silicon wafer, (b) Au-plated QCM crystal.

The pH-responsiveness of the immobilized PVP thin films was first tested using ellipsometry. As the film swells, the thickness of the films increases, which can be monitored by ellipsometry [42]. Phosphate buffer solutions were used to treat the PVP thin films. However, after soaking the PVP films in the buffer solutions and dried, white solids remained on the film surface, which compromised the thickness measurements. Dilute NaOH solutions were then used to treat the PVP films. The solution was adjusted to different pH and the film thicknesses were measured after the films were dried with nitrogen. Results in Fig. 1 showed no significant changes in film thickness from pH 8–11. An increase in film thickness, about 8%, was observed at pH 12. When the films were treated with NaOH solution at pH 13, the films became tarnished and no measurement was possible by ellipsometry.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Thicknesses of PVP films after treating with NaOH solutions of varying pH.

QCM studies were next conducted. Since QCM requires the use of gold-plated quartz crystals, the PVP thin films were prepared using PFPA-disulfide as a coupling agent following a previously developed protocol (Scheme 1b) [33]. The gold-plated quartz crystals were first treated with PFPA-disulfide. PVP was then spin-coated, irradiated in the presence of a 280-nm optical filter, and the solvent extracted to remove unattached polymer. The samples were then placed in a QCM flow-through cell, and buffer solutions of varying pH were introduced. The results showed no significant change in the resonance frequency up to pH 11 (Fig. 2). The signal decreased slightly at pH 12, and at pH 13 and beyond, large decreases in the resonance frequency were observed.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

QCM frequency responses (ΔF) of covalently attached PVP films to phosphate buffer of varying pH.

SPR analysis was performed to further corroborate the pH response behavior of PVP thin films. The SPR technique measures the refractive index change of the dielectric layer on the gold surface. For the GWC SPR imager II used in this work, the responses are presented as percent change in reflectivity (%ΔR). In this work, an in situ flow-through system was used to monitor in real time the ΔR values when the PVP thin film was treated with solutions of varying pH. Since SPR chips are gold-coated, the PVP thin films were immobilized on SPR chips following the same procedure as those on QCM chips (Scheme 1b). In the SPR experiment, the sample was inserted in the flow-through chamber, and pH 7 phosphate buffer was introduced until a stable baseline was obtained. Phosphate buffer solutions of varying pH was then introduced, and ΔR was recorded after the signals were stabilized, which typically took 2–8 min. At pH < 13, no significant change in R was observed. The percent change in reflectivity started to increase from pH 13.1, and levelled off at pH > 13.6 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Percent change in reflectivity (%ΔR) of PVP thin films treated with phosphate buffer solutions of varying pH.

4. Discussion

PVP is a weak polyprotic acid, and behaves as a weak poly-electrolyte in aqueous solutions. Polyprotic acids contain multiple acidic protons, and can dissociate sequentially with unique acid dissociation constants for each proton, designated as pK1, pK2, pK3 and so on. For weak polyprotic acids such as PVP, their acidity is often expressed as pKa(app), i.e., the apparent acid dissociation (or ionization) constant which reflects the overall degree of ionization of the polymer. The ionization constant is an important parameter in understanding the dissolution behavior of polyelectrolytes. In semiconductor and photoresist applications, the pKa values aid the selection of developer solutions as well as the design of devices based on these polyelectrolytes.

PVP as a weak polyprotic acid exists in a protonated state at low pH and a deprotonated state at high pH. At the deprotonated state, the phenol groups in PVP film are converted to phenoxide anions which repel each other. These electrostatic interactions generate repulsive forces that cause the film to swell. In this work, the extent of swelling was monitored by three different techniques: ellipsometry, QCM and SPR. In the ellipsometry measurements, the film thickness started to increase at pH 12 but the films became tarnished at pH 13. The QCM and SPR techniques allowed for real-time monitoring of the changes in the polymer thin films as they underwent swelling. The QCM frequency shift had no significant change up to pH 11. It started to decrease at pH 12, and a large change was observed at pH 13 and beyond (Fig. 2). Larger pH values were also associated with larger variances of the data points. The SPR signal, presented as the percent change in reflectivity, ΔR, underwent a substantial change in the range of pH 13.0–13.6 (Fig. 3). The correlation between the SPR signals and the solution pH results in a titration curve, from which, the acid dissociation (or ionization) constant (Ka) can be derived from the acid-base equilibrium equation as the inflection point on the curve when pH = pKa. By fitting the data to a logistic function, the apparent acid dissociation constant pKa(app) of the PVP thin film was estimated to be 13.4. This value was similar to the value of pKa ≥ 12.5 measured for a phenol-terminated momolayer on silicon wafer.[43]

The transition pH ranges obtained from the QCM and SPR analyses differ by about 1 unit. The difference in the results is likely due to the fundamental physical properties that each technique measures. QCM measures the change in frequency of the quartz crystal sensor as a function of the mass on the quartz crystal. The mass-frequency relationship, i.e., the Sauerbrey equation, applies to rigid and uniform thin layers. In our case, the frequency changes are probably caused by the swelling of PVP thin films resulting from the absorption of water/salt into the films. In addition, the swollen films are likely hydrogels rather than rigid films, and therefore, large deviation is expected in this case. In the SPR technique, the surface plasmon wave propagating at the interface between the medium and Au is a function of the dielectric constant of Au and the refractive index of the medium. The swelling of PVP films causes the change in the dielectric constant on the Au surface, which are measured by SPR. With samples firmly fixed in a liquid cell, the films were stable and the SPR signals could be monitored in situ with high reproducibility.

Flanagin et al. reported the pKa of PVP (degree of polymerization = 20) to be between 10 and 10.5 [44]. In our study, the pKa(app) values of immobilized PVP thin films measured by SPR are 3 units higher than that of the bulk polymer measured in the aqueous solutions. The higher pKa(app) value obtained from our system implies the increased stability of the PVP thin film in the protonated state. This can be caused by the hydrogen bonding between the phenol/phenoxide groups in the film, making the protons bond more tightly in the film. Furthermore, deprotonation of a phenol group adjacent to deprotonated phenoxide anions is energetically more difficult than depronating a free phenol due to the charge repulsion of neighboring phenoxide groups. In addition, a Hill coefficient of ~8 was obtained from the fitting curve in Fig. 3, indicating a higher extent of cooperativity among multiple proton sites.

The derivation of the acid-base equilibrium from the bulk solutions has been observed in other organic monolayer systems. For example, the pKa values of Ω-carboxyl alkanethiol on gold were reported to be 0.5–4.5 units larger than that of the free molecule in solution. For the monolayer of HS(CH2)2COOH on gold, Bard et al. obtained a pKa of 7.7 using AFM force measurement [45], and a pKa value of 6 was reported by Shimazu using QCM [46]. Kakiuchi and coworkers measured a pKa of 8 for the same system using double-layer-capacitance titration [47]. When the authors increased the number of methylene units in Ω-carboxyl alkanethiol to 4, 6, and 10, the pKa value increased to 8.7, 9.2 and 10.3, respectively. The increase in the ionization constant was attributed to the repulsive forces between the deprotonated groups, the hydrogen bonding interactions, and the heterogeneous environment with a lower dielectric constant in the SAM.

5. Conclusions

In summary, covalently immobilized PVP thin films were conveniently prepared by a simple photocoupling reaction of surface-tethered PFPA with PVP. The films exhibited pH-response behavior, which were monitored by ellipsometry, QCM, and SPR. All results showed the swelling of PVP films at pH > 12, and no obvious swelling between pH 7 and 12. Using SPR in conjunction with a flow through system, the apparent pKa value of the immobilized PVP monolayer was successfully determined. The result was about 3 units higher than the pKa value of the bulk polymer in aqueous solution. This can be accounted for by the increased electrostatic repulsion between the ionized phenoxide groups when the polymer is immobilized on the surface.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (CHE-1112436), the National Institutes of Health (R01GM080295), and the Royal Institute of Technology. N.K. thanks the China Scholarship Council for a special scholarship award.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at doi:

References

  • 1.Ayano E, Kanazawa H. Temperature-responsive smart packing materials utilizing multi-functional polymers. Anal. Sci. 2014;30:167–173. doi: 10.2116/analsci.30.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ware T, Simon D, Rennaker RL, Voit W. Smart polymers for neural interfaces. Polym. Rev. 2013;53:108–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kumar A, Srivastava A, Galaev IY, Mattiasson B. Smart polymers: physical forms and bioengineering applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007;32:1205–1237. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hamner KL, Alexander CM, Coopersmith K, Reishofer D, Provenza C, Maye MM. Using temperature-sensitive smart polymers to regulate dna-mediated nanoassembly and encoded nanocarrier drug release. ACS Nano. 2013;7:7011–7020. doi: 10.1021/nn402214e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qiu Y, Park K. Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 2001;53:321–339. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00203-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gil ES, Hudson SM. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their bioconjugates. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004;29:1173–1222. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hoffman AS. Stimuli-responsive polymers: biomedical applications and challenges for clinical translation. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 2013;65:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kikuchi A, Okano T. Intelligent thermoresponsive polymeric stationary phases for aqueous chromatography of biological compounds. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002;27:1165–1193. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schmaljohann D. Thermo- and pH-responsive polymers in drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 2006;58:1655–1670. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tokarev I, Motornov M, Minko S. Molecular-engineered stimuli-responsive thin polymer film: a platform for the development of integrated multifunctional intelligent materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2009;19:6932–6948. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang X, Wang X, Fernandez R, Yan M, La Rosa A. Nanolithography on responsive materials. J. Nanosci. Lett. 2012;2:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mastrotto F, Salmaso S, Lee YL, Alexander C, Caliceti P, Mantovani G. pH-Responsive Poly(4-hydroxybenzoyl methacrylates)-design and Engineering of Intelligent Drug Delivery Nanovectors. Polym. Chem. 2013;4:4375–4385. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Joshi GK, Johnson MA, Sardar R. Novel pH-responsive nanoplasmonic sensor: controlling polymer structural change to modulate localized surface plasmon resonance response. RSC Adv. 2014;4:15807–15815. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang Q, Xia F, Sun T, Song W, Zhao T, Liu M, Jiang L. Wettability switching between high hydrophilicity at low pH and high hydrophobicity at high pH on surface based on pH-responsive polymer. Chem. Commun. 2008;10:1199–1201. doi: 10.1039/b716681h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dai S, Ravi P, Tam KC. pH-responsive polymers: synthesis. Properties and Applications. Soft Matter. 2008;4:435–449. doi: 10.1039/b714741d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Draper J, Luzinov I. Mixed polymer brushes by sequential polymer addition: anchoring layer effect. Langmuir. 2004;20:4064–4075. doi: 10.1021/la0361316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rauch S, Eichhorn KJ, Kuckling D, Stamm M, Uhlmann P. Chain extension of stimuli responsive polymer brushes: a general strategy to overcome the drawbacks of the “grafting-to” approach. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013;23:5675–5681. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Olivier A, Meyer F, Raquez JM, Damman P, Dubois P. Surface-initiated controlled polymerization as a convenient method for designing functional polymer brushes: from self-assembled monolayers to patterned surfaces. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012;37:157–181. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hawker CJ, Bosman AW, Harth E. New polymer synthesis by nitroxide mediated living radical polymerizations. Chem. Rev. 2001;101:3661–3688. doi: 10.1021/cr990119u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sanjuan S, Perrin P, Pantoustier N, Tran Y. Synthesis and swelling behavior of pH-responsive polybase brushes. Langmuir. 2007;23:5769–5778. doi: 10.1021/la063450z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ito H. Chemical amplification resists for microlithography. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2005;172:37–245. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moon S-Y, Kim J-M. Chemistry of photolithographic imaging materials based on the chemical amplification concept. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2007;8:157–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Peshkova S, Li K. Investigation of poly(4-vinylphenol) as a wood adhesive. Wood Fiber Sci. 2003;35:41–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Azadmanjiri J, Berndt CC, Wang J, Kapoor A, Srivastava VK, Wen CA. Review on hybrid nanolaminate materials synthesized by deposition techniques for energy storage applications. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:3695–3708. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yoon MH, Yan H, Facchetti A, Marks TJ. Low-voltage organic field-effect transistors and inverters enabled by ultrathin cross-linked polymers as gate dielectrics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:10388–10395. doi: 10.1021/ja052488f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hu J, Zhang G, Liu S. Enzyme-responsive polymeric assemblies, nanoparticles and hydrogels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:5933–5949. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35103j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Westover D, Seitza WR, Lavine BK. Synthesis and evaluation of nitrated poly(4-hydroxystyrene) microspheres for pH sensing. Microchem. J. 2003;74:121–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu L, Yokoyama E, Watando H, Okuda-Fukui R, Kawauchi S, Satoh M. Specific swelling behaviors of Poly(4-vinyl phenol) gels in tetraalkylammonium chloride solutions. Langmuir. 2004;20:7064–7069. doi: 10.1021/la0491798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Muta H, Taniguchi T, Watando H, Yamanaka A, Takeda S, Ishida K, Kawauchi S, Satoh M. Super-salt-resistive gel prepared from Poly(4-vinyl phenol) Langmuir. 2002;18:9629–9631. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xu L, Watando H, Satoh M. Effects of chemical modifications on the swelling behaviors of poly (4-vinyl phenol) gel. Colloid. Polym. Sci. 2006;284:862–870. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang H, Ren J, Hlaing A, Yan M. Fabrication and anti-fouling properties of photochemically and thermally immobilized poly(ethylene oxide) and low molecular weight poly(ethylene glycol) thin films. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;354:160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kubo T, Wang X, Tong Q, Yan M. Polymer-based photocoupling agent for the efficient immobilization of nanomaterials and small molecules. Langmuir. 2011;27:9372–9378. doi: 10.1021/la201324h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pei Y, Yu H, Pei Z, Theurer M, Ammer C, André S, Gabius HJ, Yan M, Ramström O. Photoderivatized polymer thin films at quartz crystal microbalance surfaces: sensors for carbohydrate-protein interactions. Anal. Chem. 2007;79:6897–6902. doi: 10.1021/ac070740r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yan M. Photochemically initiated single polymer immobilization. Chem. Eur. J. 2007;13:4138–4144. doi: 10.1002/chem.200700317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gann JP, Yan M. A versatile method for grafting polymers on nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2008;24:5319–5323. doi: 10.1021/la7029592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu LH, Yan M. Perfluorophenyl azides: new applications in surface functionalization and nanomaterial synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010;43:1434–1443. doi: 10.1021/ar100066t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yan M, Ren J. Covalent immobilization of ultrathin polymer films by thermal activation of perfluorophenyl azide. Chem. Mater. 2004;16:1627–1632. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang X, Ramström O, Yan M. A photochemically initiated chemistry for coupling underivatized carbohydrates to gold nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. 2009;19:8944–8949. doi: 10.1039/B917900C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Uppalapati S, Chada S, Engelhard MH, Yan M. Photochemical reactions of poly (4-vinylphenol) thin films. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2010;211:461–470. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yan M, Harnish B. A simple method for the attachment of polymer films on solid substrates. Adv. Mater. 2003;15:244–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang H, Lee IH, Yan M. A general method to determine ionization constants of responsive polymer thin films. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;365:178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.08.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Harnish B, Robinson JT, Pei Z, Ramström O, Yan M. UV-cross-linked poly (vinylpyridine) thin films as reversibly responsive surfaces. Chem. Mater. 2005;17:4092–4096. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhao B, Mulkey D, Brittain WJ, Chen Z, Foster MD. Synthesis and characterization of phenol- and o-chlorophenol-terminated monolayers. Langmuir. 1999;15:6856–6861. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Flanagin LW, McAdams CL, Hinsberg WD, Sanchez IC, Willson CG. Mechanism of phenolic polymer dissolution: importance of acid-base equilibria. Macromolecules. 1999;32:5337–5343. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hu K, Bard AJ. Use of atomic force microscopy for the study of surface acid-base properties of carboxylic acid-terminated self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir. 1997;13:5114–5119. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shimazu K, Teranishi T, Sugihara K, Uosaki K. Surface mass titrations of self-assembled monolayers of ω-mercaptoalkanoic acids on gold. Chem. Lett. 1998;27:669–670. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kakiuchi T, Iida M, Imabayashi SI, Niki K. Double-layer-capacitance titration of self-assembled monolayers of ω-functionalized alkanethiols on au (111) surface. Langmuir. 2000;16:5397–5401. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES