Skip to main content
Neurology: Clinical Practice logoLink to Neurology: Clinical Practice
. 2015 Jun;5(3):263–266. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000127

Cerebral bleed after shunt for normal pressure hydrocephalus with cerebral amyloid angiopathy

Coincidence or consequence?

Eric McDade 1,, Brendon P Boot 1, Mario Riverol 1, Oscar Lopez 1
PMCID: PMC4469348  PMID: 26124984

Practical Implications

The use of susceptibility-weighted MRI sequences for detection of microhemorrhages should be considered in the diagnostic evaluation of possible normal pressure hydrocephalus.

The triad of gait impairment, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence in the setting of normal CSF pressure has long been described, yet our ability to predict who will experience a prolonged, meaningful response to ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting remains limited.14 Unfortunately, the procedure is associated with major risk, and improvements following shunting are not guaranteed and are often short-lived. Assessing the harm to benefit ratio can be problematic.2,4 It is imperative not only to identify those likely to respond to shunting but also to identify those with a higher risk of adverse events or those unlikely to respond. Here we report a case of right frontal lobe hemorrhage following VP shunt placement in a patient with preoperative MRI evidence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA).

Case

A 76-year-old right-handed retired laborer with a history of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, chronic urinary hesitancy without progression, and chronic back pain was evaluated for progressive gait decline and cognitive decline over the previous 2 years.

The Mini-Mental State Examination score was 21/30, with impairment in orientation, working memory, and recall; strength was normal, with decreased vibratory sensation below the knees; and deep tendon reflexes were brisk throughout with extensor plantar responses bilaterally. He had difficulty standing from a seated position without assistance and a wide-based, unsteady gait with decreased stride length without a magnetic gait quality. Vitamin B12 and folic acid were unremarkable. EMG/nerve conduction studies revealed evidence of bilateral lumbar radiculopathy. MRI of the cervical spine revealed mild central canal stenosis at C4–5. MRI of the brain (figure, A) demonstrated vetriculomegaly on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences with posterior predominance, modest global atrophy, a decrease in the intrahemispheric sulcus at the vertex (“tight high” sign5), and scattered subcortical white matter changes. The MRI was also consistent with imaging criteria for probable CAA,6 with multiple microhemorrhages in the occipital, temporal, and frontal lobes (figure, B). The relevance of the microhemorrhages was not mentioned in the clinical record.

Figure. Axial FLAIR MRI prior to the insertion of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt (A), T2* gradient echo MRI demonstrating multiple small hypodensities consistent with microhemorrhages (B), and axial CT scan (C).

Figure

(A) Serial caudal-rostral axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and coronal (T2) images demonstrating a disproportionate increase in the temporal horns and posterior lateral ventricles, mild periventricular white matter hyperintensities, and a “tight high” sign (circle) of decreased intrahemispheric sulcus near the vertex. (B) Serial caudal-rostral axial T2* gradient echo MRI demonstrating multiple small hypodensities starting in the left cerebellar hemisphere and continuing up through the occipital, temporal, and inferior right frontal cortices with a right hemisphere predominance. (C) Axial CT scan demonstrating right frontal lobe hemorrhage post ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

A lumbar drain did not improve gait in a standardized 3-day assessment, but the patient's family reported gait improvement following discharge. Two months later, a VP shunt was placed. Twenty-four hours following the procedure, a CT scan demonstrated a right frontal lobe hemorrhage (figure, C). Three months later, when referred to our service, he had considerable apathy and abulia; seizures began 9 months later. His gait remained unchanged.

DISCUSSION

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a rare disorder. Community-based studies indicate an incidence of 1.19/100,000/year.2 Although some patients have a significant and meaningful improvement after VP shunt insertion,1,3 hospital-based estimates of treatment-responsive NPH can be as low as 0.22/100,000/year.4 Improvement following shunt is more likely with short symptom duration, lesser degrees of cognitive impairment (with a pattern of subcortical-frontal impairment more typical), a syndrome dominated by gait impairment without other features of Parkinson disease, and a clear improvement in gait following high-volume CSF tap or external lumbar drain.3,7,8 Improvement after VP shunt insertion is less likely in the absence of the cardinal features of NPH: peripheral causes of urinary symptoms should not be used to complete the triad.

Identifying a reliable marker of NPH is difficult because of the varied pathologies that can contribute to the symptoms, and the presence of non-NPH pathology predicts poorer response after VP shunt insertion.2,7,8 In a recent report evaluating right frontal lobe biopsies during shunt insertion for NPH, CAA was identified in 6 of 18 biopsies. The patients with Alzheimer pathology had less favorable responses to shunting,8 but cerebral hemorrhage was not reported in those patients with CAA. Improvements in MRI technology have enabled reliable detection of cerebral microhemorrhages, an essential feature of CAA. Since CAA is a risk factor for spontaneous lobar hemorrhage, it is reasonable to assume that it will increase the likelihood of hemorrhage after insertion of a VP shunt.

Complications in shunt surgery occur in between 25% and 30% of patients,24 and death or severe residual morbidity occurs in 7%–10%.2,4 Yet some patients clearly do obtain sustained benefit from shunt insertion,3 so identifying appropriate candidates remains crucial. While relatively rare, lobar hemorrhage is a particularly debilitating complication of shunt surgery, so it is imperative to identify those at greatest risk. Given the increased risk of spontaneous lobar hemorrhage in CAA, this case raises the possibility that it may also increase the risk of hemorrhage during VP shunting. Clinicians and researchers should systematically review susceptibility-weighted MRI sequences for microhemorrhages prior to shunt insertion and consider the findings in risk stratification for the procedure.

STUDY FUNDING

No targeted funding reported.

DISCLOSURES

E. McDade has received speaker honoraria from the Alzheimer Association and the American Academy of Neurology; receives publishing royalties from UpToDate Inc.; serves as a consultant for the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Therapeutics Trial Unit; and receives research support from NIH/NIA, The Janet C. Thompson Research Fund, and Robert N. Kohman Trust for Medical Assistance and Research of The Pittsburgh Foundation. B.P. Boot and M. Riverol report no disclosures. O. Lopez serves as a consultant for Lundbeck and Grifols and receives research support from NIH/NIA. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Klinge P, Hellström P, Tans J, Wikkelsø C; European iNPH Multicentre Study Group. One-year outcome in the European multicentre study on iNPH. Acta Neurol Scand 2012;126:145–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Klassen BT, Ahlskog JE. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: how often does the diagnosis hold water? Neurology 2011;77:1119–1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McGirt MJ, Woodworth G, Coon AL, Thomas G, Williams MA, Rigamonti D. Diagnosis, treatment, and analysis of long-term outcomes in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57:699–705; discussion 699–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vanneste J, Augustijn P, Dirven C, Tan WF, Goedhart ZD. Shunting normal-pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology 1992;42:54–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hashimoto M, Ishikawa M, Mori E, Kuwana N; Study of INPH on neurological improvement (SINPHONI). Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010;7:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Knudsen KA, Rosand J, Karluk D, Greenberg SM. Clinical diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: validation of the Boston criteria. Neurology 2001;56:537–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bech-Azeddine R, Høgh P, Juhler M, Gjerris F, Waldemar G. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: clinical comorbidity correlated with cerebral biopsy findings and outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:157–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hamilton R, Patel S, Lee EB, et al. Lack of shunt response in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with Alzheimer disease pathology. Ann Neurol 2010;68:535–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neurology: Clinical Practice are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Neurology

RESOURCES