Abstract
Introduction
Soybean allergy is one of the most common food allergies especially among children. The Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) in the US requires the labeling of soy lecithin because it is derived from soybeans and may contain a number of IgE-binding proteins, possibly representing a source of hidden allergens. Here we describe a pediatric case of soy allergy misunderstood as drug allergy.
Case presentation
An 11-year-old Caucasian girl was referred to our Allergy Unit because of the delayed appearance of an itching papular rash at the site of an injection of benzathine benzylpenicillin delivered by prefilled syringe. A skin test with benzathine benzylpenicillin and detection of serum-specific IgE to penicilloyl V, penicilloyl G, ampicillin and amoxicillin were negative. From her past medical history we know that, at the age of three years, she presented with edema of the lips and difficulty in breathing after eating a soy ice-cream. For that reason, she underwent a skin prick test with soybean that was negative and a serum-specific IgE to soybean test that was weakly positive (0.21KU/L). She underwent an oral provocation test with soy milk that yielded a positive result.
Conclusions
We describe a case of a patient with a delayed reaction to soy as a hidden allergen in a benzathine benzylpenicillin prefilled syringe. This case shows that lecithin contaminated by soy proteins and used as an excipient in drugs can cause reactions in patients with soy allergy. For that reason, the source of lecithin should always be specified among the constituents of drugs to avoid a source of hidden allergens and difficulties in the allergy work-up.
Keywords: Drug allergy, Hidden allergen, Soy lecithin, Soybean allergy
Introduction
Soybean allergy is one of the most common food allergies especially among children. Approximately 0.4% of children are allergic to soy but about half of them spontaneously recover by the age of 7 years [1].
Patients with soy allergy show a wide range of immunoglobulin E (IgE) and non IgE-mediated clinical symptoms [2]. For these reasons, the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) in the US, from January 1, 2006, mandates labeling of all ingredients derived from commonly allergenic foods, including soybeans, with the exception of highly refined oils [3]. The FALCPA also requires the labeling of soy lecithin because it is derived from soybeans and may contain a number of IgE-binding proteins, possibly representing a source of hidden allergens [4]. Soy lecithin is not only used in the food industry, as an antioxidant, but it is widely used in topical skin care products, in various drugs administered either topically, orally, intravenously or by inhalation, as an emulsifier [5]. Here we describe a pediatric case of soy allergy misunderstood as drug allergy.
Case presentation
An 11-year-old Caucasian girl was referred to our Allergy Unit because of a delayed appearance (that is after 12 hours) of an itching papular rash at the site of an injection of benzathine benzylpenicillin 1,200,000 UI (Biopharma, Rome, Italy) delivered via prefilled syringe (Figure 1).
From the past medical history, at three years of age, our patient had edema of the lips and difficulty in breathing after eating a soy ice-cream. For that reason, she underwent a blood test analysis to measure the level of serum-specific IgE to milk, egg, soybean, tomato, peanut, whey and fish. Specific IgE to soybean resulted weakly positive (0.21 KUA/l) and she was put on a soybean-free diet.
At nine years of age, because of a post-traumatic spleen breakage, our patient was splenectomized and from that moment she was put on antibiotic prophylaxis with intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin (Biopharma) every 21 days. Our patient tolerated 14 injections of the drug in the formulation powder and using solvent for reconstitution. On January 2012, because of the exit from the market of this formulation, a new formulation, packaged as a prefilled syringe, was used. After the first use, our patient presented with a delayed papular rash at the injection site, as mentioned above.
A skin prick test and intradermal test with benzylpenicillin at a concentration of 10,000 UI and a patch test at 5% full-strength concentration were all negative. Moreover, the detection of serum-specific IgE to penicilloyl V, penicilloyl G, ampicillin and amoxicillin was negative; a skin prick test with soybean was negative and a serum-specific IgE to soybean was weakly positive (0.21KUA/l). Three months after the reaction mentioned above, and after receiving informed consent from the girl and her parents, we decided to perform an oral provocation test (OPT) with cefpodoxime proxetil (200mg) that yielded a negative result. We also performed an OPT with soymilk (50ml divided into three doses) with no reaction after two hours of observation on the first day; however, on the second day, she presented with diarrhea and abdominal pain. We provide a summary of our patient’s clinical findings (Table 1).
Table 1.
Race | Caucasian |
Sex | female |
Age | 11 yrs |
Respiratory allergy | none |
Food allergy | soy |
Past medical history | splenectomized after an accident injury |
Taking into account the following factors: (a) the presence of soy lecithin among the constituents of benzathine benzylpenicillin (Biopharma) both in the prefilled syringe and in the formulation powder and solvent for reconstitution; and (b) the positive medical history for soy allergy, a cause and effect link between soy lecithin and the allergic reaction was suspected. Moreover, the positive OPT with soymilk reinforced the hypothesis of a delayed allergy to soy proteins contaminating the lecithin contained in the prefilled syringe.
According to the current guidelines [6], we decided to change the antibiotic prophylaxis to orally administered cefpodoxime proxetil every 21 days and she had no further reactions.
Discussion
We describe a case of a patient with a delayed reaction to soy as an hidden allergen in a benzathine benzylpenicillin prefilled syringe.
Allergic reactions to soy lecithin have been previously reported in the literature: occupational asthma in bakers [7], chronic diarrhea in a child [8], and anaphylactic reaction in a 40-year-old woman treated with an inhalatory drug [9].
We hypothesized that beside the history of immediate IgE-mediated systemic reaction to soy, the skin reaction under investigation was not due to an IgE-mediated mechanism, considering the low level of specific IgE to soy and the delayed onset of her symptoms, but most likely it could be due to a cell-mediated reaction, as confirmed by the OPT.
Gu et al. [4] demonstrated that soy lecithin contains a number of IgE-binding proteins thus it might represent a source of hidden allergens. The presence of these allergens is a most significant concern for soy-allergic individuals consuming lecithin products as a health supplement. Presently, lecithin products used as health supplements are not labeled as containing soy protein. Although both formulations contain soy lecithin, we hypothesized that the reasons why our patient only reacted to the prefilled syringe were: (a) a different purification of lecithin extracted from soy, and (b) a progressive sensitization to soy proteins over the course of the antibiotic therapy.
Conclusions
This case shows that lecithin contaminated by soy proteins and used as an excipient in drugs can cause reactions in patients with soy allergy. For that reason, the source of lecithin should always be specified among the constituents of drugs and on the labels of food products to avoid a source of hidden allergens and difficulties in the allergy work-up.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to the parents of the patient, who graciously authorized the publication of the information here expressed.
Abbreviations
- FALCPA
Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act
- IgE
immunoglobulin E
- OPT
oral provocation test
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
SB has made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data. FM has been involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. SP has made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data. EN has given final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Contributor Information
Simona Barni, Email: simonabarni@hotmail.com.
Francesca Mori, Email: francesca.mori@meyer.it.
Stefano Pantano, Email: stefano.pantano@gmail.com.
Elio Novembre, Email: elio.novembre@meyer.it.
References
- 1.Savage JH, Kaeding AJ, Matsui EC, Wood RA. The natural history of soy allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:683–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kattan JD, Cocco RR, Järvinen KM. Milk and Soy Allergy. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011;58(2):407–426. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Food Allergy Research & Education. http://www.foodallergy.org/allergens/soy-allergy
- 4.Gu X, Beardslee T, Zeece T, Sarath G, Markwell J. Identification of IgE-binding proteins in soy lecithin. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2001;126:218–25. doi: 10.1159/000049517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gultekin F, Doguc DK. Allergic and Immunologic Reactions to Food Additives. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol. 2013;45:6–29. doi: 10.1007/s12016-012-8300-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Davies JM, Lewis MPN, Wimperis J, Rafi I, Ladhaniand S, Bolton-Maggs PHB. Review of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen: prepared on behalf of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology by a Working Party of the Haemato-Oncology Task Force. Brit J Haematol. 2011;155:308–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08843.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Perdu LF, Prevost A, Vallerand H, Cossart C, Passemard F. Baker’s asthma related to soybean lecithin exposure. Allergy. 1994;49:159–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1994.tb00819.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Renaud C, Cardiet C, Dupond C. Allergy to soy lecithin in a child. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996;22:328–9. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199604000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fine SR. Possible reactions to soya lecithin in aerosols. J Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1991;87:600. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(91)90025-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]