An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A
.gov website belongs to an official
government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you've safely
connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
information only on official, secure websites.
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:
PMC Disclaimer
|
PMC Copyright Notice
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2015 Jun 3;522(7555):236–239. doi: 10.1038/nature14503
1Division of Cancer Studies, Section of Cell Biology and Imaging King’s College London London SE1 1UL
2School of Biochemistry University of Bristol Medical Sciences Building University Walk Bristol BS8 1TD
3Wolfson Bioimaging Facility University of Bristol Medical Sciences Building University Walk Bristol BS8 1TD
4School of Physiology & Pharmacology University of Bristol Medical Sciences Building University Walk Bristol BS8 1TD
*
Correspondence : Jeremy.Carlton@kcl.ac.uk
Author Contributions
JGC conceived the study. PV, LH and JM designed, performed and analysed electron microscopy experiments. JGC and YO designed, performed and analysed data from other experiments. JGC wrote the manuscript with assistance from all other authors.
The publisher's version of this article is available at Nature
Abstract
During telophase, the nuclear envelope (NE) reforms around daughter nuclei to ensure proper segregation of nuclear and cytoplasmic contents1-4. NE reformation requires the coating of chromatin by membrane derived from the Endoplasmic Reticulum and a subsequent annular fusion step to ensure the formed envelope is sealed1,2,4,5. How annular fusion is accomplished is unknown, but it is thought to involve the p97 AAA-ATPase complex and bears a topological equivalence to the membrane fusion event that occurs during the abscission phase of cytokinesis1,6. We find here that the Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport-III (ESCRT-III) machinery localises to sites of annular fusion in the forming NE and is necessary for proper post-mitotic nucleo-cytoplasmic compartmentalisation. The ESCRT-III component Charged Multivesicular Body Protein (CHMP) 2A is directed to the forming NE through binding to CHMP4B and provides an activity essential for NE reformation. Localisation also requires the p97 complex member Ubiquitin Fusion and Degradation 1 (UFD1). Our results describe a novel role for the ESCRT-machinery in cell division and demonstrate a conservation of the machineries involved in topologically equivalent mitotic membrane remodeling events.
The ESCRT-III complex performs a topologically unique membrane fusion, allowing release of enveloped retroviruses during viral budding, intraluminal vesicles during multivesicular body biogenesis, and daughter cells during the abscission phase of cytokinesis7-11. We found that as well as localising to the midbody during late cytokinesis, endogenous ESCRT-III components CHMP2A and CHMP2B encircled the forming daughter nuclei during telophase (Figure 1A, 1B and Extended Data Figure 1A). CHMP2A localisation was sensitive to CHMP2A-targeting siRNA (Extended Data Figure 1B) and was not continuous; rather we found that CHMP2A adopted a transient punctate localisation around the decondensing nuclei during telophase (Extended Data Figure 1C, Supplementary Video 1). By scoring localisation in HeLa cells stably expressing mCh-tubulin, (cell cycle of 21.5 ± 1.7 hours, n = 93), we estimate the duration of CHMP2A localisation to be 96 ± 8.9 seconds. We found cells expressing GFP-CHMP4B12 also displayed a transient, punctate, juxta-nuclear localisation during telophase with recruitment of GFP-CHMP4B lasting 225 ± 66 seconds (n = 8, ± S.D.) and individual puncta lasting 75 ± 46 seconds (n = 92, ± S.D., Extended Data Figure 1D, Supplementary Video 2). Telophase ESCRT-III localisation was observed in other cell lines, including human-diploid fibroblasts (Extended Data Figure 1E). Using HeLa cells stably expressing a Yellow Fluorescence Protein (YFP)-tagged nuclear envelope marker (Lamin Associated Protein 2β, YFP-LAP2β)13, we determined that the juxtanuclear localisation corresponded to the forming nuclear envelope. Here, we observed colocalisation with the Lamin B Receptor (LBR)14 (Figure 1C) and demonstrated that CHMP2A localisation occurred prior to appreciable formation of a nuclear lamina or nuclear pore complexes (Extended Data Figure 1F and 1G). Whilst mitotic chromatin association of ESCRT-III has been previously reported15, its function remains unknown. To investigate the role of ESCRT-components at the NE, we employed siRNA to deplete these proteins16. As described previously17, depletion of ESCRT-components produced aberrant nuclei and these defects phenocopied those produced by depletion of proteins required for NE reformation (Extended Data Figure 1H)18. NE-reformation is thought to be a two-phase process, separable into membrane fusion events that create an expanding reticular network with subsequent annular fusion of holes within this network to create a sealed barrier1. We next employed correlative light-electron microscopy (Extended Data Figure 2A-D) to examine telophase ESCRT-III NE-localisation. We found that at the stage of ESCRT-III recruitment, the NE had incompletely formed (Figure 1D). Two populations of CHMP2A-positive membranes were found. Firstly, isolated CHMP2A-decorated vesicles were observed in the cytoplasm, proximal to the forming NE (5.7 ± 4.2 % of total cellular gold, Extended Data Figure 2Ei). Secondly, CHMP2A-decorated double-membrane sheets were observed to coat the chromatin (51 ± 1.7 % of total cellular gold was within 100 nm of the NE). On these sheets, CHMP2A localised to discrete regions, with intact NE being devoid of label, but with CHMP2A preferentially (Extended Data Figure 2H) decorating nucleo-cytoplasmic channels (mean diameter 38.4 ± 12.5 nm (n = 2 ± S.E.M., from 17 determinations)) between the forming double membranes of the NE (Figure 1D, Extended Data Figure 2D-2G, Extended Data Figure 3A-D, Supplementary Videos 3 and 4). These channels must be resolved through annular fusion and given the observed localisation and topological equivalence with cytokinetic abscission (Figure 1E), we speculated that ESCRT-III might be involved in this process.
Requirements for CHMP2A localisation to the telophase NE were revealed through depletion of partner ESCRT-proteins, with CHMP4B and CHMP3, as for other ESCRT-dependent membrane remodeling events, playing a major role in this recruitment (Figure 2A). We employed siRNA-resistant FLAG-tagged CHMP2A expressed at near-endogenous levels to report localisation in the presence of CHMP2A siRNA (Figure 2B and 2C). Through introduction of mutations targeting known binding-partners, we found, as for midbody recruitment and cytokinetic abscission (Extended Data Figure 4A and 4B), and consistent with the previously determined telophase localisation of GFP-CHMP4B (Extended Data Figure 1D), that whilst CHMP2AR-FLAG localised to the forming NE, disrupting interaction with CHMP4 proteins by mutation of Arg24, Arg27 and Arg31 to Ala (CHMP2AR-FLAG RRR-AAA)16 abolished this localisation. Mutation of the N-terminal CHMP2A α0 helix19, or residues involved in the interaction with VPS416 had no effect on NE localisation (Figure 2C, Extended Data Figure 4A). These data indicate that CHMP2A is recruited to the forming NE through classical assembly of the ESCRT-III complex.
The p97 AAA-ATPase controls both phases of NE reformation; in concert with its adaptor protein p47, it regulates membrane delivery and NE expansion whilst through its adaptors Nuclear Protein Like 4 (NPL4) and UFD1 it regulates annular fusion6. Through NPL4 and UFD1, the p97 complex extracts ubiquitinated Aurora-B, a Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) component, from chromatin to allow chromatin decondensation and membranation20,21. Given our observed ESCRT-III localisation (Figure 1) and known interactions of ESCRT-III components with the CPC13, we screened the ESCRT-machinery for interaction with the p97 complex by yeast 2-hybrid assay (Extended Data Figure 5A-D). We found that CHMP2A bound specifically to UFD1 and confirmed this interaction by direct-binding and co-precipitation assays (Figure 3A, 3B and Extended Data Figure 5E-H). We mapped the interaction with CHMP2A to the C-terminus of UFD1 (Extended Data Figure 5F and 5G) and found that truncation of the C-terminus of CHMP2A, or removal of the autoinhibitory helix (α5), prevented interaction with UFD1 (Figure 3A). We employed siRNA targeting UFD1 (Extended Data Figure 6A); although its partner protein, p97, was required for EGFR degradation22, we found cells depleted for UFD1 degraded EGFR normally (Extended Data Figure 6B), allowed release of HIV-1 based lentivirus (Extended Data Figure 6C), and as previously reported21, completed cytokinesis normally (Extended Data Figure 6D). However, whilst cells depleted for UFD1 recruited CHMP2A to the midbody (Figure 3D), recruitment of CHMP2A to the forming NE was impaired (Figure 3C and 3D).
To examine mitotic roles for ESCRT-III in NE reformation, we imaged synchronised cultures of cells stably expressing Histone 2B-mCherry (H2B-mCh) and YFP-LAP2β and quantified the time taken to enclose the chromatin with YFP-LAP2β positive nuclear envelope. We were surprised to find that cells lacking ESCRT-III, but not UFD1, enclosed their chromatin faster than control cells (Extended Data Figure 7A-C). To explore the integrity of the nascent NE in CHMP2A depleted cells, we followed a protocol similar to that recently described23 and imaged synchronised cultures of HeLa cells stably expressing both H2B-mCh and GFP-tagged β-Galactosidase (β-Gal) fused to the nuclear localisation signal (NLS) from Simian Virus 40 (GFP-NLS-βGal)24. GFP-NLS-βGal is released from the nucleus upon NE breakdown at mitotic onset and returned upon formation of transport-competent nuclear pores during NE reformation (Extended Data Figure 8A and 8B). We found that the rate of GFP-NLS-βGal return to the nucleus was slower in ESCRT-III-depleted cells (Figure 4A-C), despite the cells having enclosed their chromatin with NE membranes faster (Extended Data Figure 7A). Whilst nuclei were frequently malformed in ESCRT-III-depleted cells (Extended Data Figure 1H17), incorporation of nuclear pore complexes and import machineries were normal (Extended Data Figure 8C-8E). However, in CHMP2A-, CHMP3- or UFD1-depleted cells, the post-mitotic nucleo-cytoplasmic partitioning of GFP-NLS-βGal was reduced (Figure 4B and 4C, Extended Data Figure 9A and 9B), indicating that NE integrity was compromised by treatments that prevent ESCRT-III assembly at the NE. Results were confirmed with a second reporter (GFP-NLS) (Extended Data Figure 9C) and we demonstrated that nuclear retention of this probe was defective in post-mitotic ESCRT-III depleted cells (Extended Data Figure 9D and 9E). Using correlative live-cell electron tomography, we found that CHMP2A depletion resulted in the persistence of unsealed holes in the post-mitotic NE (Figure 4D and 4E and Extended Data Figure 10A and 10B). Paralleling CHMP2 requirements in lentiviral release and cytokinetic abscission (Extended Data Figure 6C, and Extended Data Figure 9F), depletion of CHMP2B had minimal effect upon NE integrity (Extended Data Figure 9A and 9B), whilst co-depletion of CHMP2A and CHMP2B disrupted NE integrity to a greater extent than CHMP2A depletion alone (Figure 4B). NE integrity could be rescued by stable expression of siRNA-resistant CHMP2A-FLAG (CHMP2AR-FLAG), but, as with CHMP2A requirements in cytokinesis (Extended Data Figure 4B) and HIV-1 release16, not by expression of CHMP2AR-FLAG RRR-AAA (Figure 4F and 4G). We describe a novel localisation and function of ESCRT-III in NE remodeling at sites of annular fusion, a process strikingly similar to classical ESCRT-III mediated membrane remodeling (Extended Data Figure 10C). Localisation is governed by classical ESCRT-III assembly mechanisms and also requires UFD1. An equivalent ESCRT-III-dependent membrane remodeling at the NE may allow viruses or megaRNPs to traverse this membrane25-27 and in yeast, ESCRT-III has recently been shown to participate in surveillance and extraction of defective nucleoporins at the IMN28 indicating additional ESCRT-III activities on this membrane may exist throughout the cell cycle. ESCRT-III is thus involved in regulating the quality of the NE and gene expansion within the ESCRT-machinery may have resulted from an evolutionary drive to accommodate open mitoses.
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Movie 1
Supplementary Video 1 : CHMP2A forms a reticular network around telophase nuclei
Deconvolved 3D reconstruction of HeLa cells stained with anti-CHMP2A and DAPI and analysed by widefield microscopy, from Extended Data Figure 1C.
Supplementary Video 4 : Tomographic reconstruction of nascent nuclear envelope
3D reconstruction of HeLa cells stained with anti-CHMP2A and DAPI and analysed by correlative light and electron tomography, as depicted in Figure 1D and Extended Data Figure 2.
JCG is a Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellow. We acknowledge the Nikon Imaging Centre at KCL and the NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust for access to core equipment. We thank the staff of the Wolfson Bioimaging Facility for their support. We thank Prof Juan Martin-Serrano (KCL) for gifts of plasmids and cells.
References
1.Burke B. The nuclear envelope: filling in gaps. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:E273–4. doi: 10.1038/ncb1201-e273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Anderson DJ, Hetzer MW. Shaping the endoplasmic reticulum into the nuclear envelope. J. Cell. Sci. 2008;121:137–142. doi: 10.1242/jcs.005777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Schooley A, Vollmer B, Antonin W. Building a nuclear envelope at the end of mitosis: coordinating membrane reorganization, nuclear pore complex assembly, and chromatin decondensation. Chromosoma. 2012;121:539–554. doi: 10.1007/s00412-012-0388-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Burke B, Ellenberg J. Remodelling the walls of the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:487–497. doi: 10.1038/nrm860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Lu L, Ladinsky MS, Kirchhausen T. Formation of the postmitotic nuclear envelope from extended ER cisternae precedes nuclear pore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 2011;194:425–440. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201012063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Hetzer M, et al. Distinct AAA-ATPase p97 complexes function in discrete steps of nuclear assembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:1086–1091. doi: 10.1038/ncb1201-1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Carlton JG, Agromayor M, Martin-Serrano J. Differential requirements for Alix and ESCRT-III in cytokinesis and HIV-1 release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008;105:10541–10546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802008105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Carlton JG, Martin-Serrano J. Parallels between cytokinesis and retroviral budding: a role for the ESCRT machinery. Science. 2007;316:1908–1912. doi: 10.1126/science.1143422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Elia N, Sougrat R, Spurlin TA, Hurley JH, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Dynamics of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery during cytokinesis and its role in abscission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011;108:4846–4851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102714108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Morita E, et al. Human ESCRT and ALIX proteins interact with proteins of the midbody and function in cytokinesis. EMBO J. 2007;26:4215–4227. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Jouvenet N, Zhadina M, Bieniasz PD, Simon SM. Dynamics of ESCRT protein recruitment during retroviral assembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:394–401. doi: 10.1038/ncb2207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Carlton JG, Caballe A, Agromayor M, Kloc M, Martin-Serrano J. ESCRT-III governs the Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint through CHMP4C. Science. 2012;336:220–225. doi: 10.1126/science.1217180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Clever M, Funakoshi T, Mimura Y, Takagi M, Imamoto N. The nucleoporin ELYS/Mel28 regulates nuclear envelope subdomain formation in HeLa cells. Nucleus. 2012;3:187–199. doi: 10.4161/nucl.19595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Stauffer DR, Howard TL, Nyun T, Hollenberg SM. CHMP1 is a novel nuclear matrix protein affecting chromatin structure and cell-cycle progression. J. Cell. Sci. 2001;114:2383–2393. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.13.2383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Morita E, et al. ESCRT-III protein requirements for HIV-1 budding. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;9:235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Morita E, et al. Human ESCRT-III and VPS4 proteins are required for centrosome and spindle maintenance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107:12889–12894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005938107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Asencio C, et al. Coordination of kinase and phosphatase activities by Lem4 enables nuclear envelope reassembly during mitosis. Cell. 2012;150:122–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Buchkovich NJ, Henne WM, Tang S, Emr SD. Essential N-terminal insertion motif anchors the ESCRT-III filament during MVB vesicle formation. Dev. Cell. 2013;27:201–214. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Ramadan K, et al. Cdc48/p97 promotes reformation of the nucleus by extracting the kinase Aurora B from chromatin. Nature. 2007;450:1258–1262. doi: 10.1038/nature06388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Dobrynin G, et al. Cdc48/p97-Ufd1-Npl4 antagonizes Aurora B during chromosome segregation in HeLa cells. J. Cell. Sci. 2011;124:1571–1580. doi: 10.1242/jcs.069500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Ritz D, et al. Endolysosomal sorting of ubiquitylated caveolin-1 is regulated by VCP and UBXD1 and impaired by VCP disease mutations. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1116–1123. doi: 10.1038/ncb2301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Anderson DJ, Hetzer MW. Reshaping of the endoplasmic reticulum limits the rate for nuclear envelope formation. J. Cell Biol. 2008;182:911–924. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200805140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Sorg G, Stamminger T. Mapping of nuclear localization signals by simultaneous fusion to green fluorescent protein and to beta-galactosidase. BioTechniques. 1999;26:858–862. doi: 10.2144/99265bm12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Lee C-P, et al. The ESCRT machinery is recruited by the viral BFRF1 protein to the nucleus-associated membrane for the maturation of Epstein-Barr Virus. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002904. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Pawliczek T, Crump CM. Herpes simplex virus type 1 production requires a functional ESCRT III complex but is independent of TSG101 and ALIX expression. J. Virol. 2009;83:11254–11264. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00574-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Speese SD, et al. Nuclear envelope budding enables large ribonucleoprotein particle export during synaptic Wnt signaling. Cell. 2012;149:832–846. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Supplementary Video 4 : Tomographic reconstruction of nascent nuclear envelope
3D reconstruction of HeLa cells stained with anti-CHMP2A and DAPI and analysed by correlative light and electron tomography, as depicted in Figure 1D and Extended Data Figure 2.