Skip to main content
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B logoLink to Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
. 2015 Jun;16(6):417–435. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1500010

Within-litter variation in birth weight: impact of nutritional status in the sow*

Tao-lin Yuan 1, Yu-hua Zhu 1, Meng Shi 1, Tian-tian Li 1, Na Li 1, Guo-yao Wu 2, Fuller W Bazer 2, Jian-jun Zang 1, Feng-lai Wang 1, Jun-jun Wang 1,†,
PMCID: PMC4471594  PMID: 26055904

Abstract

Accompanying the beneficial improvement in litter size from genetic selection for high-prolificacy sows, within-litter variation in birth weight has increased with detrimental effects on post-natal growth and survival due to an increase in the proportion of piglets with low birth-weight. Causes of within-litter variation in birth weight include breed characteristics that affect uterine space, ovulation rate, degree of maturation of oocytes, duration of time required for ovulation, interval between ovulation and fertilization, uterine capacity for implantation and placentation, size and efficiency of placental transport of nutrients, communication between conceptus/fetus and maternal systems, as well as nutritional status and environmental influences during gestation. Because these factors contribute to within-litter variation in birth weight, nutritional status of the sow to improve fetal-placental development must focus on the following three important stages in the reproductive cycle: pre-mating or weaning to estrus, early gestation and late gestation. The goal is to increase the homogeneity of development of oocytes and conceptuses, decrease variations in conceptus development during implantation and placentation, and improve birth weights of newborn piglets. Though some progress has been made in nutritional regulation of within-litter variation in the birth weight of piglets, additional studies, with a focus on and insights into molecular mechanisms of reproductive physiology from the aspects of maternal growth and offspring development, as well as their regulation by nutrients provided to the sow, are urgently needed.

Keywords: Within-litter variation, Pig, Mortality, Morbidity, Growth, Sow nutrition

1. Introduction

Over the last few decades, selection for highly prolific sows has resulted in an increase in litter size (Quiniou et al., 2002); however, this is positively related to a substantial increase in pre- and post-natal mortality before weaning (Johnson et al., 1999) due to greater within-litter variation in birth weights characterized by a higher proportion of low-birth-weight piglets in the litter (Milligan et al., 2002a; Quesnel et al., 2008; Kapell et al., 2011). There is a tendency for the proportion of runt piglets to be higher in litters in which birth weights of piglets are highly variable (van der Lende and Dejager, 1991). While small piglets are at greater risk of death than their larger littermates (Winters et al., 1947; Sharpe, 1966; Quiniou et al., 2002), survival of all piglets increases when there is reduced variation in birth weights of piglets within a litter (van der Lende and Dejager, 1991). At the same time, heterogeneity in birth weights of piglets among and within litters increases management costs in modern all-in-all-out swine production systems (Quiniou et al., 2002). Though some highly related factors such as genetic merit, oocyte quality, uterine capacity, and placental efficiency have been documented, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the high variability in birth weights within litters are unclear.

The aim of this review is to summarize the negative effects resulting from within-litter variation in birth weights, causative factors, and possible strategies for improving overall survival of piglets in large litters.

2. Negative effects of within-litter variation in birth weight of piglets

2.1. Pre-weaning mortality

Pre-weaning mortality is the major problem associated with improving prolificacy of sows. Approximately 15%–20% of piglets born do not survive to weaning (Fahmy and Bernard, 1971; Quiniou et al., 2002), and low birth weight is a primary contributor to poor survival to weaning (Winters et al., 1947; Pomeroy, 1960; Sharpe, 1966; Fahmy and Bernard, 1971; Bereskin et al., 1973; Pettigrew et al., 1986). Pre-weaning survival of piglets lighter than 0.45 kg was significantly lower than that of piglets weighing 1.6 kg or more (18% vs. 97%) (Fahmy and Bernard, 1971). Further, there is considerable evidence that high variation in birth-weight distribution in litters negatively skews the distribution in birth weights with the majority of piglets having birth weights well below the mean birth weight of the litter (Milligan et al., 2002b). In fact, there is a linear relationship between piglet survival and coefficient of variation for within-litter birth weight, and a curvilinear relationship between average birth weight and mortality of piglets (Fahmy and Bernard, 1971). Although there is also a favorable correlation between pre-weaning survival and within-litter variation in birth weight from the genetic perspective (Knol et al., 2002; Kapell et al., 2011), it is worth emphasizing that the adverse effects of high variation in birth weight on piglet survival are mainly due to an increase in the proportion of small piglets (Milligan et al., 2002a) since normal variation in birth weight has little effect on piglet survival in healthy litters (Milligan et al., 2001).

2.1.1. Intra-uterine growth restriction and susceptibility to infection and disease

Low-birth-weight piglets in litters with high variation in birth weights experience intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR), usually resulting in physiological dysfunctions and an increase in neonatal morbidity and mortality (Wootton et al., 1983; Aucott et al., 2004). In addition, IUGR neonates are more susceptible to infection or environmental changes due to an ineffective immune system (Cromi et al., 2009; Zhong et al., 2012), and IUGR animals have abnormal differences in size and histopathology of the thymus (Cromi et al., 2009). Consistently, overexpression of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) associated with impaired cellular immunity was observed in the intestine (Zhong et al., 2010) and liver (Li et al., 2012) of IUGR neonates, suggesting that immune function is altered widely in IUGR piglets. There is growing evidence that elevated Hsp70 reduces proliferation and impairs nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling for cell survival (Wei et al., 1995; Ran et al., 2004).

2.1.2. IUGR and hyperammonemia

Abnormal metabolism of ammonia must be taken into consideration as a cause for morbidity or mortality of small piglets (Wu G. et al., 2010). We detected an abnormally high activity of glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase in the liver of IUGR fetuses compared with normal fetuses at Day 110 of gestation, this enzyme being responsible for the generation of ammonia from glutamate (Liu et al., 2013). High levels of expression of glutamate dehydrogenase 1, coupled with reduced levels of carbomoyphosphate synthase 1 to degrade it, result in the accumulation of ammonia, which increases the risk of hyperammonemia in low-birth-weight piglets and low-birth-weight human infants (Batshaw and Brusilow, 1978). This condition severely threatens survival of the neonate. Moreover, IUGR fetuses both at Days 90 and 110 of gestation had higher concentrations of ammonia in umbilical vein plasma than normal fetuses (Lin et al., 2012), which may account for poor survival and development of IUGR fetuses. The rate of protein degradation in the IUGR fetus may be higher than that in the normal-weight fetus.

2.1.3. IUGR and insufficient colostrum intake

For low-birth-weight piglets, intake of colostrum is delayed and inadequate (Le Dividich et al., 1998; Quesnel et al., 2012), leading to a poor acquisition of passive immunity and a poor nutritional status, thereby increasing the incidence of death or poor growth performance of piglets during lactation (Rooke and Bland, 2002; Le Dividich et al., 2005). This is because colostrum is the most important source of highly digestible compounds for neonates, including glucose, fat, protein, immunoglobulins, hormones, and growth factors (Le Dividich et al., 2005) required to meet demands for energy of piglets and support maturation of the digestive and immune systems (Walzem et al., 2002; Politis and Chronopoulou, 2008). In addition, low-birth-weight neonates that have low energy reserves are at greater risk of being inadvertently crushed by the sow when she lies down (Fahmy and Bernard, 1971), as well as an inability to prevent chilling due to impaired thermogenic mechanisms (Le Dividich, 1999).

2.2. Pre-weaning growth performance

Differences in birth weights among piglets are also related to differences in pre-weaning growth performance within litters, which are mainly due to remarkable differences in both milk intake and efficiency of utilization of nutrients by littermates. Colostrum/milk intake is affected by both vitality of the piglet at birth and within-litter competition to access a teat as the teat order for suckling develops within the first 24 h after birth and is then maintained (McBride, 1963). Vigorous piglets prefer the anterior teats (Fraser et al., 1979; Thompson and Fraser, 1986), while small piglets are at a disadvantage in fighting to gain possession of these more productive anterior teats compared with their larger siblings since the teat order is a dominance hierarchy (Pond and Houpt, 1978; Auldist and King, 1995). However, per kg body weight, milk consumption does not appear to differ between IUGR and normal-weight piglets (Rezaei et al., 2011). Offspring that obtain milk from anterior and middle mammary glands (MGs) grow faster than those suckling posterior MG (Puppe and Tuchscherer, 1999; Kim et al., 2000). Besides the greater amount of colostrum and milk from anterior and middle MGs (Gill and Thomson, 1956), we reported that components in colostrum and milk secreted by anterior and posterior MGs are also distinctive (Wu W.Z. et al., 2010) in having proteins that are beneficial to passive immunity, intestinal development, and epithelial integrity; they include immunoglobulins and haptoglobin in colostrum and lactoferrin in milk from anterior MG, which are more abundant in anterior and middle MGs compared with posterior MG. In addition, piglet body weight and stimulation through suckling intensity to the MG strongly determine milk production (King et al., 1997).

The inefficient utilization of nutrient was reported for small piglets (Rezaei et al., 2011) owing to physiological immaturity at birth, especially severe dysfunction in several organs, including the intestine (Wang X.Q. et al., 2014b), liver (Liu et al., 2013), and skeletal muscle (Wang T. et al., 2013). Additionally, concentrations of key proteins involved in growth and development were reduced, while there was an abundance of proteins associated with oxidative stress, proteolysis, and ATP hydrolysis in the small intestine, liver, and muscle of low-birth-weight piglets (Wang et al., 2008). Impaired development and dysfunction of those organs and tissues that play vital roles in digestion, absorption, and metabolism of dietary nutrients (Jobgen et al., 2006) could permanently decrease post-natal growth performance and efficiency of nutrient utilization in piglets. Therefore, these overall capacity differences in intake and utilization efficiency of nutrients among piglets may partly explain why differences in body weight at birth are often maintained or even increase throughout the period of lactation.

2.3. Post-weaning growth and meat quality

In litters in which there is a high variability among piglets regarding birth weight, growth rates among those offspring are desynchronized. Litters with more variability in piglet weight at birth have more variable weaning weights (Thompson and Fraser, 1986; Milligan et al., 2001; 2002b), since birth weight, absolute body-weight gain during lactation and weight at weaning are highly correlated (Quiniou et al., 2002). As an unfavorable consequence, the time for pigs within a litter to achieve slaughter weight is variable, with an additional three weeks being required for small piglets to reach 25 kg compared with their heavier littermates (76 and 55 d, respectively) (Quiniou et al., 2002). These differences can result in an increase in feed and management costs for lighter pigs due to the longer time and increased feed required for them to reach the required minimum commercial slaughter weight.

The distribution of muscular fiber type for IUGR piglets is affected negatively (Widdowson, 1971; Wigmore and Stickland, 1983; Wu et al., 2006) as both secondary and total muscle fibers are reduced in number (Wigmore and Stickland, 1983; Wang T. et al., 2013) for small fetuses, which, in turn, adversely affects growth rate and post mortem quality of meat. The reduction in number of muscular fibers and the larger diameters for those fibers for IUGR piglets result in greater amounts of intramuscular lipids and decreased meat tenderness at slaughter (Gondret et al., 2005), leading to a decrease in meat quality and economic losses.

3. Causes for within-litter variation in birth weight

Knowledge of the underlying mechanisms responsible for various distributions in birth weights of piglets within litters has important implications for the prevention of small neonates and is crucial for enhancing the efficiency of livestock production and animal health. Growth and development of the fetus involve numerous complex biological events that can be influenced by genetics, epigenetics, maternal maturity, state of maternal nutrition, and environmental temperatures (Redmer et al., 2004). These factors affect implantation and placentation by the conceptus, angiogenesis within the uterus and placenta, utero-placental efficiency of transport of nutrients, and activities of fetal metabolic pathways (Bell and Ehrhardt, 2002; Fowden et al., 2005; Reynolds et al., 2006). All of those events may be influenced by breed characteristics that include maturity of ovulated oocytes, duration of ovulation, implantation and placentation capacity, available uterine space for implantation and placentation, size and efficiency of the placenta, as well as nutritional provision and environmental influences on the sow (Wu et al., 2006).

3.1. Duration of ovulation and oocyte maturation

The duration of ovulation, known as the time interval between ovulation of the first and the last follicle in a sow, and follicular diversity are believed to be associated with diversity in embryonic development during early pregnancy (Pope et al., 1990). Furthermore, the sequence of oocyte release during ovulation might contribute to differences in embryonic development with later-ovulated oocytes (42 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection) producing less-developed embryos at Day 4 of pregnancy, compared with earlier-ovulated oocytes (39 h after hCG injection); not surprisingly, the less-developed Day 4 embryos became the smaller blastocysts within a litter at Day 12 of gestation (Xie et al., 1990). In terms of hormone levels being key predictors of embryonic development, the more-developed blastocysts synthesize estradiol sooner than their contemporaries (Geisert et al., 1982a; Pope et al., 1988), while less-developed embryos at Day 12 of gestation contained less estradiol, less total protein, and less acid phosphatase activity (Xie et al., 1990), which might influence elongation and implantation of blastocysts. At the same time, the duration of ovulation in Meishan sows is 2 h versus 6 h for Large White sows, and this shorter interval was associated with less morphological variation and increased embryonic survival in litters of Meishan gilts (Bazer et al., 1988). Moreover, when later-ovulated follicles were removed, the diversity in embryonic morphology was reduced concomitantly, mainly through eliminating less-developed embryos (Pope et al., 1988). Further, duration of ovulation is related to the pattern of ovulation, since the distribution of follicular development and oocyte maturation are both skewed with a majority of mature follicles and oocytes (e.g. 70%) being ovulated during a short period of time and the rest (e.g. 30%) being ovulated during the following 2–6 h (Pope et al., 1990).

In contrast, Soede et al. (1992) concluded that embryonic diversity was not related to the duration of ovulation, at least up to 3 h, as they observed no significant differences in numbers of nuclei or numbers of cell cycles about 100 h after ovulation between Groups A and B (duration of ovulation was (1.8±0.6) and (4.6±1.7) h in Groups A and B, respectively). The reasons for these differences in results may include the maturation and quality of oocytes, as well as endocrine status of the sows. It is clear that embryonic diversity throughout at least the first 12 d of gestation is predetermined by factors that involve follicular development and oogenesis (Pope et al., 1990; Xie et al., 1990). Furthermore, oocyte maturation and quality can affect embryonic development and hormone secretion by the conceptus ultimately affecting the endocrine status of the uterus (Bazer et al., 2014). More studies are warranted to gain further insight into relationships between duration of ovulation and variations in embryonic development, although a body of evidence supports the view that the oocytes of later-ovulated follicles could be progenitors of small embryos.

3.2. Implantation capability of conceptuses and position within the uterus

The relationship between the fetal-placental growth and location within the uterus is evident. Pig fetuses from the ovarian end of the horn were approximately 10% heavier than those located at the middle or near end of the cervix (Waldorf et al., 1957; Perry and Rowell, 1969; Wise et al., 1997), and similar results have been described in rabbits (Rosahn and Greene, 1936). The effects of location within the uterine horn on fetal piglet weight are more notable during the last one-third of gestation when the demand for transfer of nutrients from the maternal system across the placenta to the fetus is greatest. Kim et al. (2013) concluded that fetal weight decreased linearly from the utero-tubal junction to the cervix between Days 102 and 112 of gestation. It is postulated that vascular density within the placenta varies from uterine horn to cervix, that blood flow increases from the cervical to the oviductal end of each uterine horn in gilts during early pregnancy (Ford et al., 1982), and that implantation sites with less than three blood vessels were associated with poor development of the fetus which increased fetal weight variation within the litter. Moreover, it has been observed that there is considerable diversity in development of conceptuses prior to implantation within litters (Anderson, 1978; Geisert et al., 1982a), which may contribute to differences in timing and capacity to establish adequate surface area for implantation and placentation, since elongation of the conceptus during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy is critical to implantation and depends on the conceptus achieving a specific stage of differentiation and development (Anderson, 1978; Stroband and van der Lende, 1990; Blomberg et al., 2010).

3.3. Placental efficiency

Maternal nutrition during gestation, especially the amount of nutrients provided to each conceptus, has been regarded as a major cause for within-litter variation in birth weight of piglets currently born to sows. Fetuses acquire nutrients from the maternal system via the utero-placental circulation and umbilical vein throughout gestation (Kiserud and Acharya, 2004), and transfer of nutrients from mother to fetus is impaired in pregnancies with reduced blood flow in piglets which exhibit signs of IUGR (Reynolds et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2013). Furthermore, the composition of nutrients, gases, and other molecules in the umbilical vein blood is different between normal and IUGR fetuses. Previous results from our laboratory indicated lower circulating concentrations of glucose, amino acids of the arginine family, such as arginine and glutamine, and branched-chain amino acids (valine, leucine, and isoleucine), but increased concentrations of ammonia in umbilical vein plasma during late gestation in IUGR, compared with normal fetuses (Lin et al., 2012). It is clear that the transport of nutrients by the placenta of IUGR fetuses is altered and directly impairs fetal development (Wu et al., 2008).

3.4. Available uterine space

Increase in ovulation rates for gilts and sows during the past decades is a positive response to continuous selective breeding; however, as the number of conceptuses that survive during the post-implantation period greatly exceeds uterine capacity, there is a decrease of available uterine surface area for the development of each placenta. Therefore, there is a peak in post-implantation conceptus deaths between Days 30 and 50 of gestation when uterine surface area is insufficient (Knight et al., 1977; Vonnahme et al., 2002). As gestation progresses, the negative effects of limited uterine space on fetal development also increase (Vonnahme et al., 2002). The great within-litter variation in birth weight and increased proportion of small piglets born to the highly prolific sows as used today are likely related, in part, to intra-uterine crowding from at least the end of the first month of gestation (Foxcroft et al., 2006), especially when there are more than 14 fetuses present within the uterus (Webel and Dziuk, 1974). Moreover, intra-uterine crowding can alter the pattern of development of fetal muscle fibers in the immediate post-implantation period (Foxcroft et al., 2007), when mesenchymal stem cells of the embryo undergo differentiation for myogenesis, adipogenesis or mesenchymal cells (Cossu and Borello, 1999; Du et al., 2010). Detrimental effect of uterine crowding on fetal development (Town et al., 2004) is considered to be associated with insufficient development of placental vascularity (Argente et al., 2008), while a poor vascular supply and reduced uterine space limit development of offspring that thereby experience a deficit in nutrient availability before birth (Argente et al., 2006; Foxcroft et al., 2007). This subsequently increases within-litter variation in birth weight that is associated with greater post-natal death of piglets.

3.5. Breed characteristics

There is a body of evidence implying that genetic merit does exert considerable effects on litter homogeneity, as fetal genotype determines placental and endometrial vascularity during the last one-third of gestation (Biensen et al., 1998). Convincing data revealed that development of Meishan conceptuses was more uniform between Days 8 and 14 of gestation (Bazer et al., 1988), and within-litter variation in birth weight was lower in Meishan litters than in Large White litters (Lee and Haley, 1995). Differences in growth patterns for placentas and uterine capacity (Père and Etienne, 2000) between the two breeds can account for a large portion of the significant differences in birth-weight distribution. The Meishan placentas are smaller at farrowing (Wilson et al., 1998), while vascular density progressively increases between Days 90 and 110 of gestation with constant placental size. In contrast, Large White placental size progressively increased during late gestation, while vascular density remained constant (Biensen et al., 1998; Wilson et al., 1998). Hence, endometrial surface area per Meishan placenta decreased and competition among fetuses reduced simultaneously, which is associated with the high degree of uniformity in birth weight within litters of Meishan sows.

Within-litter variation in birth weight is also affected by parity, with older sows with greater parity often having less uniform litters as well as a higher proportion of low-birth-weight piglets (Damgaard et al., 2003; Quesnel et al., 2008; Wientjes et al., 2012). Pettigrew et al. (1986) also reported that birth weights of piglets from primiparous sows were more uniform. Litter size is positively correlated with parity, reaching the highest level between parities 3–5 (Dewey et al., 1995; Hughes, 1998). However, negative effects of parity on litter homogeneity may be related to its effects on litter size, which is positively related to within-litter variation in birth weight especially in litters with more than a total of 16 piglets born (Quiniou et al., 2002; Quesnel et al., 2008; 2014). An opposite view held by Pettigrew et al. (1986) is that the apparent increase in piglet birth weight standard deviation associated with increased litter size was far from enough to explain the impacts of parity on litter uniformity. Moreover, variation in birth weight is greater in older parity sows after correction for the total number of piglets born and excluding the effects of litter size (Wientjes et al., 2012). It has been postulated that the decrease in litter uniformity in older parity sows may result from deterioration in quality of follicles/oocytes with aging as reported for women (Broekmans et al., 2009), suggesting that litter uniformity in birth weight can also be affected solely by parity.

It follows that within-litter variation in birth weight is an integrated trait influenced by many factors. Additionally, these factors can interact with each other. Thus, studies focusing on within-litter variation in birth weight are in their infancy, and more studies are needed to clarify mechanisms and develop strategies to decrease IUGR in modern sows.

4. Strategies to decrease within-litter variation in birth weight

Pregnancy outcome is influenced by interactions between nutrition and genetics (Wu et al., 2006). For specific breeds in swine production, the sow’s nutrition is attracting the most research interest with a promise of decreasing within-litter variation in birth weight. Since there are three critical stages associated with conceptus/fetus survival and development throughout gestation, nutritional strategies that focus on pre-ovulation, peri-implantation and late gestation periods are expected to increase developmental homogeneity of oocytes and/or conceptuses, and decrease variations in the capability of conceptuses to undergo successful implantation and placentation, so that the birth weights of newborn piglets are more uniform. Improving litter uniformity is expected to increase the number of piglets born alive, as well as survival of piglets pre- and post-weaning and their growth performance after weaning.

4.1. Nutrition related to follicle/oocyte maturity

There is evidence that events during oogenesis influence survival and development of swine embryos (Pope et al., 1990), since oocyte maturity may be a determinant of uniformity in embryonic development, and subsequently, within-litter variation in birth weight (van der Lende et al., 1990). Therefore, nutritional strategies directed at sows prior to mating hold great promise to decrease within-litter variation in birth weight.

4.1.1. Energy intake

Energy intake should be regarded as the intake of lipids, carbohydrate, and amino acids in diets, as well as the ratios of these nutrients. Thus, knowledge of nutrient metabolism is essential to understand the utilization and function of dietary energy. Energy is critical for reproductive performance in swine. Sows fed low-energy diets during the weaning-to-estrus interval exhibit lower ovulation rates (Zak et al., 1997; van den Brand et al., 2000), smaller follicle size and fail to exhibit strong signs of estrous behavior (Prunier et al., 1993). However, modestly high-energy diets for sows pre-mating have positive impacts on embryonic survival (Ferguson et al., 2006) and litter homogeneity (Ashworth et al., 1999). Blastocysts recovered at Day 12 of gestation from gilts on a high level of feed intake pre-mating (3.5 kg/d) exhibited a lower within-litter standard deviation in blastocyst surface area, compared with blastocysts from gilts fed a maintenance diet pre-mating (1.15 kg/d), indicating that increasing pre-mating feed intake can reduce within-litter variability in blastocyst size at Day 12 of pregnancy (Ashworth et al., 1999). In addition, variation in body weight was less for sows fed 150 g/d dextrose-supplemented diets, compared with sows fed general diets during the weaning-to-estrus interval (van den Brand et al., 2006). Similar results were obtained in response to dietary supplementation with dextrose plus lactose from the last week of gestation until sows were inseminated (van den Brand et al., 2009).

4.1.2. Energy and insulin/IGF-1

Within-litter variation in birth weight reduced through dietary manipulation during the follicular phase of the estrous cycle (van den Brand et al., 2006; 2009) is likely due to improved follicle and oocyte development associated with changes in concentrations of metabolic hormones such as insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin (Yang et al., 2000; Ferguson et al., 2003). Development of follicles and oocytes is improved owing to higher concentrations of insulin (Matamoros et al., 1990; Tokach et al., 1992; van den Brand et al., 1998; 2000; Ziecik et al., 2002) or IGF-1 in plasma (Ferguson et al., 2003). The underlying mechanism by which insulin increases follicular development is possibly due to an increase in luteinizing hormone (LH) pulsatility (Cox et al., 1987) or LH production (Adashi et al., 1981), and a higher LH pulse frequency (van den Brand et al., 2000).

4.1.3. Energy source

Effects of feeding level on reproductive performance depend on dietary energy. Follicle quality or oocyte maturation can be stimulated by carbohydrate-rich diets, but decreased by fat-rich diets (van den Brand et al., 2006), which can be explained partially by different ingredients in feed that affect different reproductive hormones (van den Brand et al., 2000). Feeding a carbohydrate-rich diet during and after lactation increases the pre-ovulatory LH peak and circulating concentrations of progesterone in comparison with feeding a fat-rich diet (Kemp et al., 1995). On the other hand, plasma insulin levels increase more rapidly in gilts fed dextrose than fat, which results in a significant difference in plasma insulin at 24 min after feeding (van den Brand et al., 1998). Furthermore, feeding a high fiber diet during the estrous cycle tends to increase embryonic survival and decrease the proportion of IUGR fetuses at Day (27±2) of gestation (Ferguson et al., 2006). This may be due to a longer time for energy or some fiber-related metabolites to enhance oocyte quality or follicular development.

4.1.4. Vitamin A/retinol

Vitamins function as micronutrients with extensive participation in metabolic processes. Alterations in dietary retinol could improve pregnancy outcome by decreasing both the incidence of low-birth-weight piglets and within-litter variation in birth weight (Whaley et al., 2000; Antipatis et al., 2008). Treatment of sows with vitamin A at weaning increased subsequent litter size through decreased embryonic mortality (Coffey and Britt, 1993) and synchronous development of embryos (Pope et al., 1990). Whaley et al. (2000) found that embryonic development was more advanced and more uniform when dietary supplementation with 1×106 IU vitamin A (retinyl palmitate) was provided from Day 15 after the second estrus until mating at the third estrus. Similarly, more embryos with greater uniformity were obtained at Day 11 of gestation from gilts treated with vitamin A before mating (Whaley et al., 1997). Positive effects of vitamin A are considered to be associated with enhanced maturation of oocytes (Robertson, 1997; Robertson et al., 1997) and, consequently, enhanced embryonic development (Besenfelder et al., 1996). Further, concentrations of progesterone, IGF-1, and prostaglandin F2-α (PGF2-α) in follicular fluid were greater in vitamin-A-treated than in control gilts. Effects of vitamin A on follicle maturation were suggested to be through an IGF-1 stimulatory mechanism, since IGF-1 produced by granulosa cells plays a key role in the resumption of oocyte meiosis (Hammond et al., 1991) and increases both proliferation and progesterone synthesis and secretion by granulosa cells (Giudice, 1992).

4.2. Nutrition related to the peri-implantation period of pregnancy

Maternal recognition of pregnancy and conceptus implantation are the most important biological events associated with the establishment of pregnancy (Perry et al., 1976). Estrogen secreted by pig conceptuses is the major signal for maternal recognition of pregnancy at approximately Day 11 of gestation (Dhindsa and Dziuk, 1968; Perry et al., 1973; Bazer and Thatcher, 1977; Flint et al., 1979), which coincides with the time of conceptus elongation (Heap et al., 1979; Geisert et al., 1982b). Moreover, the morphological transition of conceptuses from spherical to tubular and filamentous forms occurs between Days 10 and 12 (Geisert et al., 1982b; Bazer and Johnson, 2014).

Implantation is a gradual process starting as early as Day 13 when elongation of the conceptus is underway and is well advanced by Day 18 of gestation (Perry et al., 1976), which is a determinant for establishing sufficient uterine surface area for placentation and subsequent nutrient transport for piglet survival and development (Geisert et al., 2014; Bazer and Johnson, 2014). It should be emphasized that establishment of pregnancy (conceptus elongation and implantation) also involves maternal uterine pro-inflammatory and immune responses (Geisert et al., 2014), due to a number of cytokines released or stimulated by the elongating conceptuses, such as NF-κB (Hayden and Ghosh, 2012) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β) (Ross et al., 2003; Blomberg et al., 2005). In order to avoid rejection by the immune response, an increase in expression of both IL1B and estrogen by individual conceptuses counter-balances stimulation of the pro-inflammatory and immune response within the uterus (Geisert et al., 2014); thus elongating conceptus can attach across the uterine luminal epithelial surface successfully.

As stated above, elongation of pig conceptuses is triggered by the conceptus achieving a specific stage of differentiation and development within the uterus (Bazer et al., 2014). Thus, it is a maternal event and has never been achieved in vitro (Anderson, 1978; Stroband and van der Lende, 1990; Blomberg et al., 2010; Bazer, 2013). However, various stages of conceptus development (spherical, tubular and filamentous) can be observed prior to and during the time of trophoblast elongation within the same litter (Anderson, 1978; Geisert et al., 1982a), leading to remarkable differences in timing, position, and area of implantation, and, thereafter, various states of survival and development. It is worth noting that pre-implantation embryonic losses are considered to make up the largest proportion of prenatal losses in pigs (Wiseman et al., 1998), suggesting that this is a key period to regulate embryonic survival and development during the implantation window and to affect placentation.

4.2.1. L-Arginine

Dietary supplementation with 0.4% or 0.8% L-arginine between Days 14 and 25 of gestation increased number of viable fetuses per litter by 2 on Day 25 compared with a control group (Li et al., 2014). This positive result is consistent with the presence of unusually high concentrations of amino acids in the arginine family in porcine allantoic fluid at the stage of blastocyst expansion and implantation in vivo (Wu et al., 1996; Gao et al., 2012) and of an increase in endometrial angiogenesis between Days 13 and 18 of gestation (Keys et al., 1986). Furthermore, arginine stimulates the AKT1-mTOR/FRAP1-RPS6K-RPS6 cell signaling pathways to increase proliferation and migration of porcine (Kong et al., 2012) and ovine (Kim et al., 2011) trophectoderm cells during peri-implantation period. The positive impact of L-arginine supplementation during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy is due in part to the production of NO, since this is crucial for embryonic development and implantation (Maul et al., 2003; Wang X.Q. et al., 2014a). Putrescine, which is a product of arginine catabolism in maternal tissues (Wu et al., 2009), can also stimulate protein synthesis in porcine placental cells (Kong et al., 2014). Of note, dietary supplementation of 0.8% L-arginine between Day 0 and Day 25 of gestation reduced litter size, uterine weight, total number of fetuses, number of corpora lutea and total fetal weights significantly at Day 25 (Li et al., 2010). Even though there was increased vascularity of the uterus due to arginine supplementation, its administration too early (from onset of estrus) interfered with normal ovulation, which decreased production of progesterone and estrone (Li et al., 2010). From these aspects, dietary supplementation with L-arginine during the peri-implantation period is expected to promote survival and synchronize development of embryos within a litter.

4.2.2. Retinol/vitamin A

Providing a vitamin A-deficient diet for 100 d prior to mating and during the first month of pregnancy increased the uniformity of birth weights and showed a tendency to decrease the incidence of low-birth-weight piglets (Antipatis et al., 2008). Moreover, sows on vitamin A-deficient diets did not experience a reduction in fetal survival and growth at Day 30 of pregnancy (Ashworth and Antipatis, 1999), perhaps due to a compensatory increase in the abundance of retinol binding protein (RBP) (Antipatis et al., 2008). Since pig conceptuses secrete RBP prior to onset of elongation and throughout the peri-implantation period, RBP could be an important component of the uterine secretions for early embryonic development (Harney et al., 1990; Schweigert et al., 1999). Thus, elevated levels of RBP in gilts deficient in vitamin A can account for positive outcomes of piglets having low within-litter variation in birth weight.

It is well documented that progesterone is required to maintain pregnancy and circulating concentrations of progesterone can be modulated by feed intake. Sows receiving high ((2.8±0.02) kg/d) nutrient intake, compared with a low ((1.5±0.01) kg/d) nutrient intake, from Day 0 to Day 9 of pregnancy had higher embryonic survival at Day 10 of pregnancy ((92±3)% vs. (77±3)%) (Athorn et al., 2013), which may be due to higher concentrations of blood progesterone in response to adequate feed intake. Progesterone synthesis is likely to be impaired when dietary intake of nutrients (particularly amino acids) and energy is insufficient.

4.3. Nutrition related to fetal growth during late gestation

Approximately 90% of fetal growth occurs during the last one-third of pregnancy. This period of pregnancy is characterized by a high incidence of limitations on fetal development and increased within-litter variation in fetal weight. The weight variation among piglets in each litter increased from Day 45 to Day 60 of gestation (Kim et al., 2009). After implantation, the placenta is the only organ through which nutrients, waste and respiratory gases are exchanged between the sow and conceptus (Faber and Thornburg, 1983). The size and capacity of the placenta for nutrient transfer play key roles in determining the prenatal growth of the fetus and hence affect birth weight directly (Redmer et al., 2004). Placentation that occurs during early pregnancy is one of the most important developmental events (Boshier, 1969; King et al., 1982), since it is tightly associated with embryonic survival (Reynolds and Redmer, 2001). Extensive angiogenesis occurs in both the maternal uterus and fetal placenta during placentation, and umbilical blood flow increases during the same time (Reynolds et al., 1984; Reynolds and Redmer, 1992; 1995). It has been reported that early embryonic mortality increases as placental vascular development decreases (Meegdes et al., 1988; Reynolds and Redmer, 1995). Therefore, adequately balanced diets provided to sows and functional nutrients available for placental transport are two major factors affecting uniformity of piglets in a litter during late gestation. Supplementation of diets with functional amino acids (e.g. arginine and glutamine) holds great promise for preventing fetal growth restriction (Wu et al., 2013a; Lin et al., 2014).

4.3.1. L-Arginine/N-carbamyl-L-glutamate

Amino acids in the arginine family (arginine, glutamine, glutamate, proline, aspartate, asparagine, citrulline, and ornithine) have been studied extensively given their prominent effects in improving litter size (Greenberg et al., 1997; Hazeleger et al., 2007; Mateo et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014). At the same time, dietary supplementation with 25.5 g/d L-arginine from Day 77 of pregnancy until term reduced within-litter variation in birth weight of live-born piglets by 20.6% and 25.4% in arginine and control groups, respectively (Quesnel et al., 2014). Dietary supplementation with 0.1% N-carbamyl-L-glutamate (NCG) from Day 90 of gestation also increased litter size born alive and total litter weight for piglets born alive (Liu et al., 2012).

L-Arginine is an important precursor for the synthesis of NO and polyamines (Wu and Morris, 1998; Wu et al., 2007; Blachier et al., 2011), both of which play key roles in placental growth and angiogenesis (Wu et al., 2006). Similarly, NCG stimulates expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (Liu et al., 2012) associated with vasculogenesis and angiogenesis (Hanahan, 1997; Arroyo and Winn, 2008). Subsequently, NCG increases blood flow and placental efficiency (McCrabb and Harding, 1996; Gardner et al., 2001), as well as the provision of nutrients to fetuses. Therefore, nutrient partitioning among fetuses is less variable as is within-litter variation in birth weight of piglets. However, there are other reports that do not indicate positive effects of dietary supplementation with L-arginine during mid-gestation to term on within-litter uniformity (Mateo et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2012). These different findings may be explained by differences in the total amounts of dietary L-arginine and other amino acids consumed by gestating pigs (Wu et al., 2013b; 2013c).

As previously mentioned, either dextrose supplementation during the weaning-to-estrus interval or 1% L-arginine supplementation during the last one-third of gestation can reduce within-litter variation in birth weights (van den Brand et al., 2006; Quesnel et al., 2014). Unexpectedly, combined supplies of dextrose beginning one week before insemination and L-arginine during the last one-third of pregnancy in sow diets had no obvious beneficial effects on within-litter variation in birth weight, compared with control groups (Quesnel et al., 2014). This was postulated to be correlated with complex interactions between different nutrients. High levels of glucose can affect amino acid metabolism and, therefore, may not be beneficial for embryonic and fetal survival, growth, or development. Thus, consideration must be given to interactions among different nutrients when manipulating maternal diets during gestation.

4.3.2. Glutamine

As a member of the arginine family of amino acids, glutamine plays a key role in many metabolic processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and embryonic development (Petters et al., 1990; Wu et al., 2011). Concentrations of glutamine are highest among amino acids in fetal tissues and maternal placenta (Self et al., 2004), and there are increased concentrations of glutamine in allantoic fluid in the second third of gestation (Wu et al., 1996), which highlights the importance of glutamine during that stage of rapid placental and fetal growth.

Within-litter variation in weight of piglets can also be reduced by dietary supplementation with glutamine (Wu et al., 2010). Sows fed a basal gestational diet supplemented with mixture of 8 g L-arginine and 12 g L-glutamine had reduced within-litter variation in birth weight either on the basis of total piglets or live-born piglets, and the proportion of runt piglets was decreased. It would be of interest to determine whether dietary supplementation with L-glutamate, which is the immediate precursor of L-glutamine (Rezaei et al., 2013b) and is another functional amino acid (Wu, 2010), can enhance fetal growth and reduce birth-weight variation among piglets.

4.3.3. Branched chain amino acids

Branched chain amino acids (BCAAs), including leucine, isoleucine, and valine, have received growing attention owing to their emerging functional importance (Lei et al., 2012; 2013). These amino acids are substrates for the synthesis of glutamate and arginine, and, therefore, alanine, citrulline, arginine, and proline in pigs (Rezaei et al., 2013a) and ruminant species (Wu et al., 2014). Data from our laboratories suggest that dietary supplementation with BCAAs throughout pregnancy can reverse IUGR in a rat model of malnutrition (Zheng et al., 2009). In litters derived from BCAA-supplemented gestating sows, weights of piglets and placentas increase by 18.4% and 18.0%, respectively, and litter size is also increased. Furthermore, BCAA treatment increased IGF-1 in embryonic liver, estrogen receptor-α and progesterone receptor in the uterus, and IGF-II in placentas, all of which are beneficial to survival and growth of the conceptus. There was also enhanced expression of two key enzymes (fructose-1,6-biphosphatase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase) involved in gluconeogenesis in embryonic livers. These positive findings indicate that BCAAs have important roles in enhancing positive pregnancy outcomes.

Fetal growth is affected by the nutritional, metabolic and endocrine status of the maternal system which is affected by dietary intake of nutrients (Lin et al., 2014). Moreover, nutrient requirements of sows are distinct at different stages of gestation (Kim et al., 2013). Therefore, more studies to gain insight into the molecular mechanism for the role of maternal nutrients on fetal programming are necessary for designing innovative nutrient-balanced gestational diets that enhance the homogeneity of birth weight of piglets.

4.4. Genetic selection

Litter size, directly related to productivity, has been considered as a key factor in genetic selection. As a result, the total number of piglets at birth has been significantly improved in past decades (Southwood and Kennedy, 1991; Estany and Sorensen, 1995). However, this practice has also increased the neonatal mortality of piglets owing to the increased percentage of low-birth-weight pigs (Lund et al., 2002). To avoid this situation, scientists have started to test whether litter size at Day 5 (LS5) after birth can be used to reduce the neonatal mortality while not decreasing the litter size at birth. Recent results from 42 807 Landrace and 33 225 Yorkshire sows showed a significant genetic and phenotypic improvement in the total number of piglets at birth and neonatal survival (Nielsen et al., 2013), as well as litter size at weaning (Su et al., 2007; EAAP, 2011) by using LS5 as an index of genetic selection. Therefore, this criterion has been extended for use in the Danish Landrace and Yorkshire breeding program since 2004 (Nielsen et al., 2013). At the same time, a maternal line selected on litter size at weaning in rabbits for 21 generations improved the number of progeny born alive and litter size at weaning, compared with selection on litter size at birth (García and Baselga, 2002), suggesting that it is effective in both promoting litter size at birth and survival rate during lactation (Savietto et al., 2014). Additionally, it is feasible to select for within-litter uniformity in birth weight (Damgaard et al., 2003; Kapell et al., 2011) to improve piglet survival (Canario et al., 2010). A selection experiment on within-litter birth-weight variation in rabbits yielded a favorable response and decreased pre-weaning morbidity (Garreau et al., 2004). Collectively, genetic selection by combining litter uniformity at birth, survival rate during lactation, and litter size at weaning holds a promise of improving pig productivity.

5. Summary and perspectives

Currently, special attention is given to within-litter variation in birth weight, as a distinct problem in modern highly prolific sows. Heterogeneity is a problem mainly for piglets with low birth weight that have suffered from IUGR (Foxcroft et al., 2006), which is associated with high pre-weaning mortality, variable weights at weaning, and poor growth performance post-weaning, resulting in lower production efficiency and economic losses. Furthermore, within-litter homogeneity in birth weight may also be related to a decrease in stillbirths (Damgaard et al., 2003; Canario et al., 2006). In this context, the development of strategies that reduce within-litter variation in birth weight or unfavorable traits that are negatively related to piglet survival is essential for sustaining the pig industry. Since the degree of heterogeneity within litters increases as a response to selection for litter size (Johnson et al., 1999), genetic selection on litter size should be accompanied by selection on piglet survival traits (losses from birth to weaning and the minimal birth weight in the litter, which are proposed as potential traits for a selection against piglet mortality) and birth-weight traits (Wolf et al., 2008). On the other hand, identifying the physiological and biochemical mechanisms responsible for variation in litter birth weight and optimizing maternal nutrition to support requirements for growth and development of conceptuses is essential. Research focused on regulation of litter homogeneity is in its infancy, and therefore, more researches are essential to better understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which certain nutrients regulate metabolic pathways and embryonic/fetal development. It should also be borne in mind that nutrient interactions (e.g. ratios of amino acids, carbohydrate, and fatty acids) affect within-litter variation in birth weight. Finally, gestating swine requires not only proteinogenic amino acids that cannot be synthesized in animal cells but also proteinogenic and possibly non-proteinogenic amino acids that can be synthesized in the body to support their maximum reproductive performance (Wang W.W. et al., 2013; Wu, 2014). These synthesizable, functional amino acids include L-arginine, L-glutamine, L-proline, and glycine (Wang W.W. et al., 2014; Wu, 2013) to improve anti-oxidative capacity, immunity, health, well-being, and tissue protein synthesis in gestating mammals (e.g. pigs).

Footnotes

*

Project supported by the National Basic Research Program (973) of China (No. 2012CB124703) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31129006, 31272449, and 31422052)

Compliance with ethics guidelines: Tao-lin YUAN, Yu-hua ZHU, Meng SHI, Tian-tian LI, Na LI, Guo-yao WU, Fuller W. BAZER, Jian-jun ZANG, Feng-lai WANG, and Jun-jun WANG declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  • 1.Adashi EY, Hsueh A, Yen S. Insulin enhancement of luteinizing-hormone and follicle-stimulating-hormone release by cultured pituitary-cells. Endocrinology. 1981;108(4):1441–1449. doi: 10.1210/endo-108-4-1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson LL. Growth, protein content and distribution of early pig embryos. Anat Rec. 1978;190(1):143–153. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091900112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Antipatis C, Finch AM, Ashworth CJ. Effect of controlled alterations in maternal dietary retinol on foetal and neonatal retinol status and pregnancy outcome in pigs. Livest Sci. 2008;118(3):247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.01.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Argente MJ, Santacreu MA, Climent A, et al. Influence of available uterine space per fetus on fetal development and prenatal survival in rabbits selected for uterine capacity. Livest Sci. 2006;102(1-2):83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.11.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Argente MJ, Santacreu MA, Climent A, et al. Effects of intrauterine crowding on available uterine space per fetus in rabbits. Livest Sci. 2008;114(2-3):211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.05.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Arroyo JA, Winn VD. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the IUGR placenta. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32(3):172–177. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ashworth CJ, Antipatis C. Effects of pre- and post-mating nutrition on embryo survival in gilts. Reprod Domest Anim. 1999;34(3-4):103–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.1999.tb01226.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ashworth CJ, Beattie L, Antipatis C, et al. Effects of pre- and post-mating feed intake on blastocyst size, secretory function and glucose metabolism in Meishan gilts. Reprod Fert Dev. 1999;11(6):323–327. doi: 10.1071/RD99040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Athorn RZ, Stott P, Bouwman EG, et al. Effect of feeding level on luteal function and progesterone concentration in the vena cava during early pregnancy in gilts. Reprod Fert Dev. 2013;25(3):531–538. doi: 10.1071/RD11295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aucott SW, Donohue PK, Northington FJ. Increased morbidity in severe early intrauterine growth restriction. J Perinatol. 2004;24(7):435–440. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Auldist DE, King RH. Piglets’ role in determining milk production in the sow. In: Hennessy DP, Cranwell PD, editors. Manipulating Pig Production V. Werribee, Australia: Australasian Pig Science Association; 1995. pp. 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Batshaw ML, Brusilow SW. Asymptomatic hyper-ammonemia in low-birth-weight infants. Pediatr Res. 1978;12(3):221–224. doi: 10.1203/00006450-197803000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bazer FW. Pregnancy recognition signaling mechanisms in ruminants and pigs. J Anim Sci Biotech. 2013;4(1):23. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bazer FW, Thatcher WW. Theory of maternal recognition of pregnancy in swine based on estrogen controlled endocrine versus exocrine secretion of prostaglandin-f2α by uterine endometrium. Prostaglandins. 1977;14(2):397–401. doi: 10.1016/0090-6980(77)90185-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bazer FW, Johnson GA. Pig blastocyst-uterine interactions. Differentiation. 2014;87(1-2):52–65. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2013.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bazer FW, Thatcher WW, Martinatbotte F, et al. Conceptus development in large white and prolific Chinese Meishan pigs. J Reprod Fert. 1988;84(1):37–42. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0840037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bazer FW, Wu G, Johnson GA, et al. Environmental factors affecting pregnancy: endocrine disrupters, nutrients and metabolic pathways. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;398(1-2):53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bell AW, Ehrhardt RA. Regulation of placental nutrient transport and implications for fetal growth. Nutr Res Rev. 2002;15(2):211–230. doi: 10.1079/NRR200239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bereskin B, Shelby CE, Cox DF. Some factors affecting pig survival. J Anim Sci. 1973;36(5):821–827. doi: 10.2134/jas1973.365821x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Besenfelder U, Solti L, Seregi J, et al. Different roles for B-carotene and vitamin A in the reproduction on rabbits. Theriogenology. 1996;45(8):1583–1591. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(96)00127-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Biensen NJ, Wilson ME, Ford SP. The impact of either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterus on Meishan or Yorkshire fetal and placental development to days 70, 90, and 110 of gestation. J Anim Sci. 1998;76(8):2169–2176. doi: 10.2527/1998.7682169x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blachier F, Davila AM, Benamouzig R, et al. Channelling of arginine in NO and polyamine pathways in colonocytes and consequences. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2011;16(1):1331–1343. doi: 10.2741/3792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Blomberg LA, Long EL, Sonstegard TS, et al. Serial analysis of gene expression during elongation of the peri-implantation porcine trophectoderm (conceptus) Physiol Genomics. 2005;20(2):188–194. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00157.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Blomberg LA, Schreier L, Li RW. Characteristics of peri-implantation porcine concepti population and maternal milieu influence the transcriptome profile. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010;77(11):978–989. doi: 10.1002/mrd.21253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boshier DP. A histological and histochemical examination of implantation and early placentome formation in sheep. J Reprod Fert. 1969;19(1):51–61. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0190051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Broekmans FJ, Soules MR, Fauser BC. Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev. 2009;30(5):465–493. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Canario L, Cantoni E, Le Bihan E, et al. Between-breed variability of stillbirth and its relationship with sow and piglet characteristics. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(12):3185–3196. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Canario L, Lundgren H, Haandlykken M, et al. Genetics of growth in piglets and the association with homogeneity of body weight within litters. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(4):1240–1247. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Coffey MT, Britt JH. Enhancement of sow reproductive-performance by β-carotene or vitamin-A. J Anim Sci. 1993;71(5):1198–1202. doi: 10.2527/1993.7151198x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cossu G, Borello U. Wnt signaling and the activation of myogenesis in mammals. EMBO J. 1999;18(24):6867–6872. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.24.6867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cox NM, Stuart MJ, Althen TG, et al. Enhancement of ovulation rate in gilts by increasing dietary energy and administering insulin during follicular-growth. J Anim Sci. 1987;64(2):507–516. doi: 10.2134/jas1987.642507x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Raffaelli R, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of thymus size in IUGR fetuses: a marker of the fetal immunoendocrine response to malnutrition. Ultrasound Obst Gyn. 2009;33(4):421–426. doi: 10.1002/uog.6320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Damgaard LH, Rydhmer L, Lovendahl P, et al. Genetic parameters for within-litter variation in piglet birth weight and change in within-litter variation during suckling. J Anim Sci. 2003;81(3):604–610. doi: 10.2527/2003.813604x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dewey CE, Martin SW, Friendship RM, et al. Associations between litter size and specific sow-level management factors in Ontario swine. Prev Vet Med. 1995;23(1-2):101–110. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(94)00427-K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dhindsa DS, Dziuk PJ. Influence of varying the proportion of uterus occupied by embryos on maintenance of pregnancy in the pig. J Anim Sci. 1968;27(3):668–672. doi: 10.2134/jas1968.273668x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Du M, Tong J, Zhao J, et al. Fetal programming of skeletal muscle development in ruminant animals. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(13 Suppl.):E51–E60. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.EAAP. Book of Abstracts of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production: Stavanger, Norway, Vol. 17. Wageningen Academic Pub; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Estany J, Sorensen D. Estimation of genetic-parameters for litter size in Danish-Landrace and Yorkshire pigs. Anim Sci. 1995;60(2):315–324. doi: 10.1017/S1357729800008481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Faber JJ, Thornburg KL. Placental Physiology. Structure and Function of Fetomaternal Exchange. New York: Raven Press; 1983. pp. 1–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fahmy MH, Bernard C. Cause of mortality in Yorkshire pigs from birth to 20 weeks of age. Can J Anim Sci. 1971;51(2):351–359. doi: 10.4141/cjas71-048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ferguson EM, Ashworth CJ, Edwards SA, et al. Effect of different nutritional regimens before ovulation on plasma concentrations of metabolic and reproductive hormones and oocyte maturation in gilts. Reproduction. 2003;126(1):61–71. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1260061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ferguson EM, Slevin J, Edwards SA, et al. Effect of alterations in the quantity and composition of the pre-mating diet on embryo survival and foetal growth in the pig. Anim Reprod Sci. 2006;96(1-2):89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Flint A, Burton RD, Gadsby JE, et al. Blastocyst oestrogen synthesis and the maternal recognition of pregnancy. Ciba Found Symp. 1979;64:209–238. doi: 10.1002/9780470720479.ch10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ford SP, Reynolds LP, Magness RR. Blood flow to the uterine and ovarian vascular beds of gilts during the estrous cycle or early pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1982;27(4):878–885. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod27.4.878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fowden AL, Giussani DA, Forhead AJ. Endocrine and metabolic programming during intrauterine development. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81(9):723–734. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Foxcroft GR, Dixon WT, Novak S, et al. The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(13 Suppl.):E105–E112. doi: 10.2527/2006.8413_supple105x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Foxcroft GR, Vinsky MD, Paradis F, et al. Macroenvironment effects on oocytes and embryos in swine. Theriogenology. 2007;68(Suppl. 1):S30–S39. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fraser D, Thompson BK, Ferguson DK, et al. The ‘teat order’ of suckling pigs: 3. Relation to competition within litters. J Agric Sci. 1979;92(2):257–261. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600062742. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gao K, Jiang Z, Lin Y, et al. Dietary L-arginine supplementation enhances placental growth and reproductive performance in sows. Amino Acids. 2012;42(6):2207–2214. doi: 10.1007/s00726-011-0960-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.García ML, Baselga M. Estimation of genetic response to selection in litter size of rabbits using a cryopreserved control population. Livest Prod Sci. 2002;74(1):45–53. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00280-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gardner DS, Powlson AS, Giussani DA. An in vivo nitric oxide clamp to investigate the influence of nitric oxide on continuous umbilical blood flow during acute hypoxaemia in the sheep fetus. J Physiol. 2001;537(2):587–596. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00587.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Garreau H, Bolet G, Hurtaud J, et al. Genetic homogenization of a character. Preliminary results of a canalising selection on the birth weight of young rabbits. ITEA Prod Anim. 2004;100A(3):172–178. (in Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Geisert RD, Renegar RH, Thatcher WW, et al. Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: I. Interrelationships between preimplantation development of the pig blastocyst and uterine endometrial secretions. Biol Reprod. 1982;27(4):925–939. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod27.4.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Geisert RD, Brookbank JW, Roberts RM, et al. Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: II. Cellular remodeling of the porcine blastocyst during elongation on Day 12 of pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1982;27(4):941–955. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod27.4.941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Geisert RD, Lucy MC, Whyte JJ, et al. Cytokines from the pig conceptus: roles in conceptus development in pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014;5(1):51. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-5-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gill JC, Thomson W. Observations on the behaviour of suckling pigs. Brit J Anim Behav. 1956;4(2):46–51. doi: 10.1016/S0950-5601(56)80022-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Giudice LC. Insulin-like growth-factors and ovarian follicular development. Endocr Rev. 1992;13(4):641–669. doi: 10.1210/edrv-13-4-641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gondret F, Lefaucheur L, Louveau I, et al. The long-term influences of birth weight on muscle characteristics and eating meat quality in pigs individually reared and fed during fattening. Arch Tierzucht. 2005;48:68–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Greenberg SS, Lancaster JR, Xie JM, et al. Effects of NO synthase inhibitors, arginine-deficient diet, and amiloride in pregnant rats. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(3):R1031–R1045. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1997.273.3.R1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hammond JM, Mondschein JS, Samaras SE, et al. The ovarian insulin-like growth-factors, a local amplification mechanism for steroidogenesis and hormone action. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991;40(1-3):411–416. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(91)90209-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hanahan D. Signaling vascular morphogenesis and maintenance. Science. 1997;277(5322):48–50. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5322.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Harney JP, Mirando MA, Smith LC, et al. Retinol-binding protein—a major secretory product of the pig conceptus. Biol Reprod. 1990;42(3):523–532. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod42.3.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hayden MS, Ghosh S. NF-B, the first quarter-century: remarkable progress and outstanding questions. Gene Dev. 2012;26(3):203–234. doi: 10.1101/gad.183434.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hazeleger W, Ramaekers P, Smits C, et al. Influence of nutritional factors on placental growth and piglet imprinting. In: Wiseman J, Varley MA, McOrist S, editors. Paradigms in Pig Science. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 2007. pp. 309–327. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Heap RB, Flint A, Gadsby JE, et al. Hormones, the early embryo and the uterine environment. J Reprod Fert. 1979;55(1):267–275. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0550267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hughes PE. Effects of parity, season and boar contact on the reproductive performance of weaned sows. Livest Prod Sci. 1998;54(2):151–157. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00175-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jobgen WS, Fried SK, Fu WJ, et al. Regulatory role for the arginine-nitric oxide pathway in metabolism of energy substrates. J Nutr Biochem. 2006;17(9):571–588. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Johnson RK, Nielsen MK, Casey DS. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size. J Anim Sci. 1999;77(3):541–557. doi: 10.2527/1999.773541x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kapell DNRG, Ashworth CJ, Knap PW, et al. Genetic parameters for piglet survival, litter size and birth weight or its variation within litter in sire and dam lines using Bayesian analysis. Livest Sci. 2011;135(2-3):215–224. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kemp B, Soede NM, Helmond FA, et al. Effects of energy source in the diet on reproductive hormones and insulin during lactation and subsequent estrus in multiparous sows. J Anim Sci. 1995;73(10):3022–3029. doi: 10.2527/1995.73103022x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Keys JL, King GJ, Kennedy TG. Increased uterine vascular-permeability at the time of embryonic attachment in the pig. Biol Reprod. 1986;34(2):405–411. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod34.2.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kim J, Burghardt RC, Wu G, et al. Select nutrients in the ovine uterine lumen. VII. Effects of arginine, leucine, glutamine, and glucose on trophectoderm cell signaling, proliferation, and migration. Biol Reprod. 2011;84(1):62–69. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kim SW, Hurley WL, Han IK, et al. Growth of nursing pigs related to the characteristics of nursed mammary glands. J Anim Sci. 2000;78(5):1313–1318. doi: 10.2527/2000.7851313x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kim SW, Hurley WL, Wu G, et al. Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(14 Suppl.):E123–E132. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kim SW, Weaver AC, Shen YB, et al. Improving efficiency of sow productivity: nutrition and health. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;4(1):26. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.King GJ, Atkinson BA, Robertson HA. Implantation and early placentation in domestic ungulates. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1982;31:17–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.King RH, Mullan BP, Dunshea FR, et al. The influence of piglet body weight on milk production of sows. Livest Prod Sci. 1997;47(2):169–174. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(96)01404-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kiserud T, Acharya G. The fetal circulation. Prenatal Diag. 2004;24(13):1049–1059. doi: 10.1002/pd.1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Knight JW, Bazer FW, Thatcher WW, et al. Conceptus development in intact and unilaterally hysterectomized-ovariectomized gilts: interrelations among hormonal status, placental development, fetal fluids and fetal growth. J Anim Sci. 1977;44(4):620–637. doi: 10.2134/jas1977.444620x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Knol EF, Leenhouwers JI, van der Lende T. Genetic aspects of piglet survival. Livest Prod Sci. 2002;78(1):47–55. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00184-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kong XF, Tan BE, Yin YL, et al. L-Arginine stimulates the mTOR signaling pathway and protein synthesis in porcine trophectoderm cells. J Nutr Biochem. 2012;23(9):1178–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kong XF, Wang XQ, Yin YL, et al. Putrescine stimulates the mTOR signaling pathway and protein synthesis in porcine trophectoderm cells. Biol Reprod. 2014;91(5):106. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.113977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Le Dividich J. Manipulating Pig Production VII: Proceedings of the seventh biennial conference of the Australasian Pig Science Association (APSA) Adelaide, South Australia: 1999. A review—neonatal and weaner pig: management to reduce variation; pp. 135–155. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Le Dividich J, Noblet J, Herpin P, et al. Thermoregulation. In: Wiseman J, Varley MA, Chadwick JP, editors. Progress in Pig Science. Nottingham University Press; 1998. pp. 229–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Le Dividich J, Rooke JA, Herpin P. Nutritional and immunological importance of colostrum for the new-born pig. J Agric Sci. 2005;143(6):469–485. doi: 10.1017/S0021859605005642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lee GJ, Haley CS. Comparative farrowing to weaning performance in Meishan and Large White pigs and their crosses. Anim Sci. 1995;60(2):269–280. doi: 10.1017/S1357729800008432. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lei J, Feng DY, Zhang YL, et al. Nutritional and regulatory role of branched-chain amino acids in lactation. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2012;17(7):2725–2739. doi: 10.2741/4082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lei J, Feng DY, Zhang YL, et al. Hormonal regulation of leucine catabolism in mammary epithelial cells. Amino Acids. 2013;45(3):531–541. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1332-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Li W, Zhong X, Zhang L, et al. Heat shock protein 70 expression is increased in the liver of neonatal intrauterine growth retardation piglets. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2012;25(8):1096–1101. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Li X, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, et al. Dietary supplementation with 0.8% L-arginine between days 0 and 25 of gestation reduces litter size in gilts. J Nutr. 2010;140(6):1111–1116. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.121350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Li X, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, et al. Dietary supplementation with L-arginine between days 14 and 25 of gestation enhances embryonic development and survival in gilts. Amino Acids. 2014;46(2):375–384. doi: 10.1007/s00726-013-1626-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Lin G, Liu C, Feng C, et al. Metabolomic analysis reveals differences in umbilical vein plasma metabolites between normal and growth-restricted fetal pigs during late gestation. J Nutr. 2012;142(6):990–998. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.153411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lin G, Wang X, Wu G, et al. Improving amino acid nutrition to prevent intrauterine growth restriction in mammals. Amino Acids. 2014;46(7):1605–1623. doi: 10.1007/s00726-014-1725-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Liu C, Lin G, Wang X, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction alters the hepatic proteome in fetal pigs. J Nutr Biochem. 2013;24(6):954–959. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Liu XD, Wu X, Yin YL, et al. Effects of dietary L-arginine or N-carbamylglutamate supplementation during late gestation of sows on the miR-15b/16, miR-221/222, VEGFA and eNOS expression in umbilical vein. Amino Acids. 2012;42(6):2111–2119. doi: 10.1007/s00726-011-0948-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lund MS, Puonti M, Rydhmer L, et al. Relationship between litter size and perinatal and pre-weaning survival in pigs. Anim Sci. 2002;74(2):217–222. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Matamoros IA, Cox NM, Moore AB. Exogenous insulin and additional energy affect follicular distribution, follicular steroid concentrations, and granulosa-cell human chorionic-gonadotropin binding in swine. Biol Reprod. 1990;43(1):1–7. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod43.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mateo RD, Wu G, Bazer FW, et al. Dietary L-arginine supplementation enhances the reproductive performance of gilts. J Nutr. 2007;137(3):652–656. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.3.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Maul H, Longo M, Saade GR, et al. Nitric oxide and its role during pregnancy: from ovulation to delivery. Curr Pharm Design. 2003;9(5):359–380. doi: 10.2174/1381612033391784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.McBride G. The “teat order” and communication in your pigs. Anim Behav. 1963;11(1):53–56. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(63)90008-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.McCrabb GJ, Harding R. Role of nitric oxide in the regulation of cerebral blood flow in the ovine foetus. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1996;23(10-11):855–860. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1996.tb01133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Meegdes BH, Ingenhoes R, Peeters LL, et al. Early pregnancy wastage: relationship between chorionic vascularization and embryonic development. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(2):216–220. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59704-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Milligan BN, Fraser D, Kramer DL. Birth weight variation in the domestic pig: effects on offspring survival, weight gain and suckling behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2001;73(3):179–191. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Milligan BN, Dewey CE, de Grau AF. Neonatal-piglet weight variation and its relation to pre-weaning mortality and weight gain on commercial farms. Prev Vet Med. 2002;56(2):119–127. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(02)00157-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Milligan BN, Fraser D, Kramer DL. Within-litter birth weight variation in the domestic pig and its relation to pre-weaning survival, weight gain, and variation in weaning weights. Livest Prod Sci. 2002;76(1-2):181–191. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00012-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Nielsen B, Su G, Lund MS, et al. Selection for increased number of piglets at d 5 after farrowing has increased litter size and reduced piglet mortality. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(6):2575–2582. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Père MC, Etienne M. Uterine blood flow in sows: effects of pregnancy stage and litter size. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2000;40(4):369–382. doi: 10.1051/rnd:2000105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Perry JS, Rowell JG. Variation in foetal weight and vascular supply along the uterine horn of the pig. J Reprod Fertil. 1969;19(3):527–534. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0190527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Perry JS, Heap RB, Amoroso EC. Steroid hormone production by pig blastocysts. Nature. 1973;245(5419):45–47. doi: 10.1038/245045a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Perry JS, Heap RB, Burton RD, et al. Endocrinology of the blastocyst and its role in the establishment of pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1976;(25):85–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Petters RM, Johnson BH, Reed ML, et al. Glucose, glutamine and inorganic-phosphate in early development of the pig embryo in vitro . J Reprod Fertil. 1990;89(1):269–275. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0890269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Pettigrew JE, Cornelius SG, Moser RL, et al. Effects of oral doses of corn oil and other factors on preweaning survival and growth of pigs. J Anim Sci. 1986;62(3):601–612. doi: 10.2527/jas1986.623601x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Politis I, Chronopoulou R. Milk peptides and immune response in the neonate. In: Bösze Z, editor. Bioactive Components of Milk. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 606. Springer New York; 2008. pp. 253–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Pomeroy RW. Infertility and neonatal mortality in the sow. I. Lifetime performance and reasons for disposal of sows. J Agric Sci. 1960;54(1):1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600021432. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Pond WG, Houpt KA. The Biology of the Pig. Comstock Pub. Associates; 1978. p. 371. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Pope WF, Wilde MH, Xie S. Effect of electrocautery of nonovulated day 1 follicles on subsequent morphological variation among day 11 porcine embryos. Biol Reprod. 1988;39(4):882–887. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod39.4.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Pope WF, Xie S, Broermann DM, et al. Causes and consequences of early embryonic diversity in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1990;40:251–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Prunier A, Dourmad JY, Etienne M. Feeding level, metabolic parameters and reproductive-performance of primiparous sows. Livest Prod Sci. 1993;37(1-2):185–196. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(93)90071-O. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Puppe B, Tuchscherer A. Developmental and territorial aspects of suckling behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa f. domestica) J Zool. 1999;249(3):307–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00767.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Quesnel H, Brossard L, Valancogne A, et al. Influence of some sow characteristics on within-litter variation of piglet birth weight. Animal. 2008;2(12):1842. doi: 10.1017/S175173110800308X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Quesnel H, Farmer C, Devillers N. Colostrum intake: influence on piglet performance and factors of variation. Livest Sci. 2012;146(2-3):105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Quesnel H, Quiniou N, Roy H, et al. Supplying dextrose before insemination and L-arginine during the last third of pregnancy in sow diets: effects on within-litter variation of piglet birth weight. J Anim Sci. 2014;92(4):1445–1450. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Quiniou N, Dagorna J, Gaudre D. Variation of piglets birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livest Prod Sci. 2002;78(1):63–70. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00181-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ran R, Lu A, Zhang L, et al. Hsp70 promotes TNF-mediated apoptosis by binding IKKγ and impairing NF-κB survival signaling. Genes Dev. 2004;18(12):1466–1481. doi: 10.1101/gad.1188204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Redmer DA, Wallace JM, Reynolds LP. Effect of nutrient intake during pregnancy on fetal and placental growth and vascular development. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2004;27(3):199–217. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2004.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Reynolds LP, Redmer DA. Growth and microvascular development of the uterus during early pregnancy in ewes. Biol Reprod. 1992;47(5):698–708. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod47.5.698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Reynolds LP, Redmer DA. Utero-placental vascular development and placental function. J Anim Sci. 1995;73(6):1839–1851. doi: 10.2527/1995.7361839x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Reynolds LP, Redmer DA. Angiogenesis in the placenta. Biol Reprod. 2001;64(4):1033–1040. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod64.4.1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Reynolds LP, Magness RR, Ford SP. Uterine blood flow during early pregnancy in ewes: interaction between the conceptus and the ovary bearing the corpus luteum. J Anim Sci. 1984;58(2):423–429. doi: 10.2527/jas1984.582423x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Reynolds LP, Caton JS, Redmer DA, et al. Evidence for altered placental blood flow and vascularity in compromised pregnancies. J Physiol. 2006;572(1):51–58. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.104430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Rezaei R, Knabe DA, Li X, et al. Enhanced efficiency of milk utilization for growth in surviving low-birth-weight piglets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2011;2(2):73–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Rezaei R, Wang WW, Wu ZL, et al. Biochemical and physiological bases for utilization of dietary amino acids by young pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;4(1):7. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Rezaei R, Knabe DA, Tekwe CD, et al. Dietary supplementation with monosodium glutamate is safe and improves growth performance in postweaning pigs. Amino Acids. 2013;44(3):911–923. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1420-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Robertson JA. Investigations of the action of vitamin A and β carotene on reproductive performance in pigs. Australia: Victoria University of Technology; 1997. PhD Thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Robertson JA, Towstoless MK, Ott TL, et al. Effect of retinol palmitate on ovarian follicle size and follicular hormone concentration in the gilt. Biol Reprod. 1997;56(1):452. [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Rooke JA, Bland IM. The acquisition of passive immunity in the new-born piglet. Livest Prod Sci. 2002;78(1):13–23. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00182-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Rosahn PD, Greene HSN. The influence of intrauterine factors on the fetal weight of rabbits. J Exp Med. 1936;63(6):901–921. doi: 10.1084/jem.63.6.901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Ross JW, Ashworth MD, Hurst AG, et al. Analysis and characterization of differential gene expression during rapid trophoblastic elongation in the pig using suppression subtractive hybridization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1(1):23. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Savietto D, Cervera C, Rodenas L, et al. Different resource allocation strategies result from selection for litter size at weaning in rabbit does. Animal. 2014;8(4):618–628. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113002437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Schweigert FJ, Bonitz K, Siegling C, et al. Distribution of vitamin A, retinol-binding protein, cellular retinoic acid-binding protein I, and retinoid X receptor β in the porcine uterus during early gestation. Biol Reprod. 1999;61(4):906–911. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.4.906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Self JT, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, et al. Glutamine synthesis in the developing porcine placenta. Biol Reprod. 2004;70(5):1444–1451. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.025486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Sharpe HB. Pre-weaning mortality in a herd of Large White pigs. Brit Vet J. 1966;122(3):99–111. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)40711-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Soede NM, Noordhuizen JPTM, Kemp B. The duration of ovation in pigs, studied by transrectal ultrasonography, is not related to early embryonic diversity. Theriogenology. 1992;38(4):653–666. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(92)90028-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Southwood OI, Kennedy BW. Genetic and environmental trends for litter size in swine. J Anim Sci. 1991;69(8):3177–3182. doi: 10.2527/1991.6983177x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Stroband HW, van der Lende T. Embryonic and uterine development during early pregnancy in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1990;40:261–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Su G, Lund MS, Sorensen D. Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(6):1385–1392. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Thompson BK, Fraser D. Variation in piglet weights: development of within litter variation over a 5-week lactation and effect of farrowing crate design. Can J Anim Sci. 1986;66(2):361–372. doi: 10.4141/cjas86-037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Tokach MD, Pettigrew JE, Dial GD, et al. Characterization of luteinizing-hormone secretion in the primiparous, lactating sow-relationship to blood metabolites and return-to-estrus interval. J Anim Sci. 1992;70(7):2195–2201. doi: 10.2527/1992.7072195x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Town SC, Putman CT, Turchinsky NJ, et al. Number of conceptuses in utero affects porcine fetal muscle development. Reproduction. 2004;128(4):443–454. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.van den Brand H, Soede NM, Schrama JW, et al. Effects of dietary energy source on plasma glucose and insulin concentration in gilts. J Anim Physiol An N. 1998;79(1-5):27–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.1998.tb00626.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.van den Brand H, Dieleman SJ, Soede NM, et al. Dietary energy source at two feeding levels during lactation of primiparous sows: I. Effects on glucose, insulin, and luteinizing hormone and on follicle development, weaning-to-estrus interval, and ovulation rate. J Anim Sci. 2000;78(2):396–404. doi: 10.2527/2000.782396x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.van den Brand H, Soede NM, Kemp B. Supplementation of dextrose to the diet during the weaning to estrus interval affects subsequent variation in within-litter piglet birth weight. Anim Reprod Sci. 2006;91(3-4):353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.van den Brand H, van Enckevort LCM, van der Hoeven EM, et al. Effects of dextrose plus lactose in the sows diet on subsequent reproductive performance and within litter birth weight variation. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009;44(6):884–888. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01106.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.van der Lende T, Dejager D. Death risk and preweaning growth-rate of piglets in relation to the within-litter weight distribution at birth. Livest Prod Sci. 1991;28(1):73–84. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(91)90056-V. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.van der Lende T, Hazeleger W, Dejager D. Weight distribution within litters at the early fetal stage and at birth in relation to embryonic mortality in the pig. Livest Prod Sci. 1990;26(1):53–65. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(90)90055-B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Vonnahme KA, Wilson ME, Foxcroft GR, et al. Impacts on conceptus survival in a commercial swine herd. J Anim Sci. 2002;80(3):553–559. doi: 10.2527/2002.803553x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Waldorf DP, Foote WC, Sele HL, et al. Factory affecting fetal pig weight late in gestation. J Anim Sci. 1957;4(16):976–985. doi: 10.2134/jas1957.164976x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Walzem RL, Dillard CJ, German JB. Whey components: millennia of evolution create functionalities for mammalian nutrition: what we know and what we may be overlooking. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2002;42(4):353–375. doi: 10.1080/10408690290825574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Wang J, Chen L, Li D, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction affects the proteomes of the small intestine, liver, and skeletal muscle in newborn pigs. J Nutr. 2008;138(1):60–66. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.1.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Wang T, Liu C, Feng C, et al. IUGR alters muscle fiber development and proteome in fetal pigs. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2013;18(2):598–607. doi: 10.2741/4123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Wang WW, Wu ZL, Dai ZL, et al. Glycine metabolism in animals and humans: implications for nutrition and health. Amino Acids. 2013;45(3):463–477. doi: 10.1007/s00726-013-1493-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Wang WW, Wu ZL, Lin G, et al. Glycine stimulates protein synthesis and inhibits oxidative stress in pig small-intestinal epithelial cells. J Nutr. 2014;144(10):1540–1548. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.194001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Wang XQ, Frank JW, Xu J, et al. Functional role of arginine during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy. II. Consequences of loss of function of nitric oxide synthase NOS3 mRNA in ovine conceptus trophectoderm. Biol Reprod. 2014;91(3):59. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.121202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Wang XQ, Lin G, Liu C, et al. Temporal proteomic analysis reveals defects in small-intestinal development of porcine fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction. J Nutr Biochem. 2014;25(7):785–795. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Webel SK, Dziuk PJ. Effect of stage of gestation and uterine space on prenatal survival in pig. J Anim Sci. 1974;38(5):960–963. doi: 10.2134/jas1974.385960x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Wei YQ, Zhao X, Kariya Y, et al. Inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis by abrogation of heat-shock protein (HSP) 70 expression in tumor cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1995;40(2):73–78. doi: 10.1007/BF01520287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Whaley SL, Hedgpeth VS, Britt JH. Evidence that injection of vitamin A before mating may improve embryo survival in gilts fed normal or high-energy diets. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(4):1071–1077. doi: 10.2527/1997.7541071x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Whaley SL, Hedgpeth VS, Farin CE, et al. Influence of vitamin A injection before mating on oocyte development, follicular hormones, and ovulation in gilts fed high-energy diets. J Anim Sci. 2000;78(6):1598–1607. doi: 10.2527/2000.7861598x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Widdowson EM. Intrauterine growth retardation in pig. I. Organ size and cellular development at birth and after growth to maturity. Neonatology. 1971;19(4-6):329–340. doi: 10.1159/000240427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Wientjes JGM, Soede NM, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, et al. Piglet uniformity and mortality in large organic litters: effects of parity and pre-mating diet composition. Livest Sci. 2012;144(3):218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.11.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Wigmore P, Stickland NC. Muscle development in large and small pig fetuses. J Anat. 1983;137(Pt 2):235–245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Wilson ME, Biensen NJ, Youngs CR, et al. Development of Meishan and Yorkshire littermate conceptuses in either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterine environment to day 90 of gestation and to term. Biol Reprod. 1998;58(4):905–910. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod58.4.905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Winters LM, Cummings JN, Stewart HA. A study of factors affecting survival from birth to weaning and total weaning weight of the litter in swine. J Anim Sci. 1947;6(3):288–296. doi: 10.2134/jas1947.63288x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Wise T, Roberts AJ, Christenson RK. Relationships of light and heavy fetuses to uterine position, placental weight, gestational age, and fetal cholesterol concentrations. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(8):2197–2207. doi: 10.2527/1997.7582197x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Wiseman J, Varley MA, Chadwick JP. Progress in Pig Science. Nottingham University Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Wolf J, Zakova E, Groeneveld E. Within-litter variation of birth weight in hyperprolific Czech Large White sows and its relation to litter size traits, stillborn piglets and losses until weaning. Livest Sci. 2008;115(2-3):195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.07.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Wootton R, Flecknell PA, Royston JP, et al. Intrauterine growth-retardation detected in several species by non-normal birth-weight distributions. J Reprod Fertil. 1983;69(2):659–663. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0690659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Wu G. Functional amino acids in growth, reproduction and health. Adv Nutr. 2010;1(1):31–37. doi: 10.3945/an.110.1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Wu G. Functional amino acids in nutrition and health. Amino Acids. 2013;45(3):407–411. doi: 10.1007/s00726-013-1500-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Wu G. Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: a paradigm shift in protein nutrition. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014;5(1):34. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-5-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Wu G, Morris SM. Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond. Biochem J. 1998;336(1):1–17. doi: 10.1042/bj3360001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Wu G, Bazer FW, Tuo WB, et al. Unusual abundance of arginine and ornithine in porcine allantoic fluid. Biol Reprod. 1996;54(6):1261–1265. doi: 10.1093/biolreprod/54.6.1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Wu G, Bazer FW, Wallace JM, et al. Board-invited review: intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(9):2316–2337. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Wu G, Bazer FW, Davis TA, et al. Important roles for the arginine family of amino acids in swine nutrition and production. Livest Sci. 2007;112(1-2):8–22. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Wu G, Bazer FW, Datta S, et al. Proline metabolism in the conceptus: implications for fetal growth and development. Amino Acids. 2008;35(4):691–702. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Wu G, Bazer FW, Davis TA, et al. Arginine metabolism and nutrition in growth, health and disease. Amino Acids. 2009;37(1):153–168. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0210-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Wu G, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, et al. Impacts of amino acid nutrition on pregnancy outcome in pigs: mechanisms and implications for swine production. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(13 Suppl.):E195–E204. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Wu G, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, et al. Triennial Growth Symposium: important roles for L-glutamine in swine nutrition and production. J Anim Sci. 2011;89(7):2017–2030. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Wu G, Wu ZL, Dai ZL, et al. Dietary requirements of “nutritionally nonessential amino acids” by animals and humans. Amino Acids. 2013;44(4):1107–1113. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1444-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Wu G, Bazer FW, Satterfield MC, et al. Impacts of arginine nutrition on embryonic and fetal development in mammals. Amino Acids. 2013;45(2):241–256. doi: 10.1007/s00726-013-1515-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Wu G, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, et al. Maternal and fetal amino acid metabolism in gestating sows. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2013;68:185–198. [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Wu G, Bazer FW, Dai Z, et al. Amino acid nutrition in animals: protein synthesis and beyond. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2014;2(1):387–417. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Wu WZ, Wang XQ, Wu GY, et al. Differential composition of proteomes in sow colostrum and milk from anterior and posterior mammary glands. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(8):2657–2664. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-2972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Xie S, Broermann DM, Nephew KP, et al. Ovulation and early embryogenesis in swine. Biol Reprod. 1990;43(2):236–240. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod43.2.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Yang H, Foxcroft GR, Pettigrew JE, et al. Impact of dietary lysine intake during lactation on follicular development and oocyte maturation after weaning in primiparous sows. J Anim Sci. 2000;78(4):993–1000. doi: 10.2527/2000.784993x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Zak LJ, Cosgrove JR, Aherne FX, et al. Pattern of feed intake and associated metabolic and endocrine changes differentially affect postweaning fertility in primiparous lactating sows. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(1):208–216. doi: 10.2527/1997.751208x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Zheng C, Huang C, Cao Y, et al. Branched-chain amino acids reverse the growth of intrauterine growth retardation rats in a malnutrition model. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2009;22(11):1495–1503. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2009.90127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Zhong X, Wang T, Zhang X, et al. Heat shock protein 70 is upregulated in the intestine of intrauterine growth retardation piglets. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2010;15(3):335–342. doi: 10.1007/s12192-009-0148-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Zhong X, Li W, Huang X, et al. Impairment of cellular immunity is associated with overexpression of heat shock protein 70 in neonatal pigs with intrauterine growth retardation. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2012;17(4):495–505. doi: 10.1007/s12192-012-0326-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Ziecik AJ, Kapelanski W, Zaleska M, et al. Effect of diet composition and frequency of feeding on postprandial insulin level and ovarian follicular development in prepubertal pigs. J Anim Feed Sci. 2002;11(3):471–483. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B are provided here courtesy of Zhejiang University Press

RESOURCES