Abstract
The Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) is the insect vector of the fastidious bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), the causal agent of citrus greening disease, or Huanglongbing (HLB). The widespread invasiveness of the psyllid vector and HLB in citrus trees worldwide has underscored the need for non-traditional approaches to manage the disease. One tenable solution is through the deployment of RNA interference technology to silence protein-protein interactions essential for ACP-mediated CLas invasion and transmission. To identify psyllid interactor-bacterial effector combinations associated with psyllid-CLas interactions, cDNA libraries were constructed from CLas-infected and CLas-free ACP adults and nymphs, and analyzed for differential expression. Library assemblies comprised 24,039,255 reads and yielded 45,976 consensus contigs. They were annotated (UniProt), classified using Gene Ontology, and subjected to in silico expression analyses using the Transcriptome Computational Workbench (TCW) (http://www.sohomoptera.org/ACPPoP/). Functional-biological pathway interpretations were carried out using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes databases. Differentially expressed contigs in adults and/or nymphs represented genes and/or metabolic/pathogenesis pathways involved in adhesion, biofilm formation, development-related, immunity, nutrition, stress, and virulence. Notably, contigs involved in gene silencing and transposon-related responses were documented in a psyllid for the first time. This is the first comparative transcriptomic analysis of ACP adults and nymphs infected and uninfected with CLas. The results provide key initial insights into host-parasite interactions involving CLas effectors that contribute to invasion-virulence, and to host nutritional exploitation and immune-related responses that appear to be essential for successful ACP-mediated circulative, propagative CLas transmission.
Introduction
The Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) is the insect vector and host of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), the causal agent of citrus greening disease, also known as Huanglongbing (HLB) [1–3]. CLas is a fastidious, phloem-limited bacterium classified into the α subdivision of the Proteobacteria [4]. The ACP-CLas complex is endemic to Asia, and exotic to all citrus growing regions of Africa, the Caribbean Basin, Central, North, and South America, the Mediterranean region, and the Arabian Peninsula [5–7] (http://www.aphis.usda.gov). In the U.S. CLas was first detected in citrus trees in Florida during 2004–05, following the introduction of ACP there ten years before [3]. Since then, CLas has been confirmed infecting citrus trees in California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Texas (http://www.hungrypests.com/faqs/citrus-greening.php).
The biology of Ca. Liberibacter interactions with its psyllid vector are not well studied at the functional genomics level. CLas and several other Liberibacter species infect both their psyllid vector and a suite of plant hosts, typically in a plant host-vector specific manner [8–13]. Based on the relatively small genome size of CLas 1.23-Mb [14], the absence of plant-colonizing extracellular degradative enzymes, and the predicted, limited ability for aerobic respiration, the bacterium is predicted to utilize key host plant and probably psyllid metabolites, and has adopted an intracellular lifestyle with the host plant like its close relatives in the Rhizobiales [15], and has evolved a host-parasite relationship akin to certain other pathogens that engage in multi-partite interactions to enable dual host exploitation [16].
The transmission of CLas by ACP adults reared from the egg to adult stage on CLas-infected citrus host plants occurs at a frequency of ~40% [17]. However, CLas transmission has been demonstrated to be efficient, only when the bacterium is ingested by the nymphal stages of ACP [18]. Whether a particular nymphal stage or stages must ingest CLas to facilitate adult-mediated transmission has not been determined. Although CLas-free adults that have been given an acquisition-access period (AAP) on CLas-infected plants harbor the bacterium (e.g. based on molecular detection), transmission of CLas to the plant host has not been demonstrated [17, 18]. In addition, the detection of CLas by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the offspring of CLas-infected ACP reared on infected citrus, at a frequency of 2–6% [17], indicates that transovarial (vertical) transmission is not the primary mode by which CLas sustains its relationship with the psyllid or plant host, but rather serves as a fail-safe mechanism to ensure its survival in a small fraction of the ACP population when the ACP-reproductive hosts are unavailable. A similarly low frequency of sexual transmission was also reported to occur between males and females [19] and could likewise serve as a survival strategy during reproductive diapause [20].
Comparisons of the CLas genome with intracellular parasites of other insects and mammals [15] indicate it encodes no genes for purine and pyrimidine metabolism, and has a minimal number of DNA excision repair genes, suggesting that CLas depends on the psyllid host for essential metabolic functions and nutritional requirements uniquely, in relation to those provided during the plant host portion of the cycle. This is consistent with other well-studied symbioses involving insect-microbe complexes that share nutritional resources and proteins essential for survival by partitioning them between both partners [21].
Virulence factors of vertically-transmitted, propagative bacteria are essential for invasion and establishment in the host, and comprise carbohydrates, lipids, or proteins that function either as toxins or effectors. Gram negative bacterial effectors are delivered directly or indirectly to the host cell, typically as toxins or through secretion systems to exploit host proteins during invasion, colonization, and systemic spread [22–24]. Certain plant pathogen-insect vectors transmit plant viruses and fastidious bacteria that are circulative and propagative in the insect. In these instances pathogen-encoded effector proteins are essential for infection and circulation in the insect vector, and utilize a mode of transmission referred to as circulative and propagative [25], making them pathogenic to both insect and plant hosts. Only somewhat recently, CLas as well as certain other psyllid-associated Liberibacter species have been shown to use a circulative, propagative mode of transmission. In these systems the bacterium associates with the psyllid gut, filter chamber, hemolymph, salivary glands, muscles, and fat bodies [8–11].
Genetic manipulation and other strategies for managing vector-borne pathogens [26–28], have been deployed to interfere with vector-mediated transmission of viruses. In one example virus-vector competency of mosquitos for Dengue virus has been reduced substantially by infecting the vector with Wolbachia (wMel), which blocks virus replication, and makes the mosquito refractory to transmission to the human host [27]. This and other recent successes have stimulated an interest in the use of non-genetic approaches such as dsRNA technology to mediate gene knock down in RNAi-competent insects, among which are ACP and the potato psyllid [29–30]. The circulative-propagative CLas transmission cycle (Fig 1) involves the ingestion of CLas by ACP from plant sap, which passes into the food canal and then the alimentary canal (gut) where CLas resides, multiplies, and forms extensive biofilms [31]. CLas exits the gut to enter the hemolymph where it becomes motile [32–33] and circulates in the blood to the oral region and enters the salivary glands, the presumed organ of transmission specificity. The dsRNA targeting of ACP transcripts that interact with CLas effectors during the invasion-adhesion-biofilm formation, multiplication, circulation, and acquisition phases, hinges on the ability to identify those that respond specifically to CLas in the circulative, propagative pathway in its psyllid vector. Interactors responsible for transovarial and sexual transmission might also play an important role in fitness of the pathogen because it guarantees transmission by alternate means. Therefore it would be ideal to look at the transmission cycle as a whole to dissect out the effectors involved at different stages (Fig 1). So far, only stage and tissue specific transcripts have been documented from CLas-free ACP by Hunter et al. [34] and Reese et al. [35].
The objective of this study was to identify differentially expressed candidate transcripts in cDNA libraries constructed from ACP adults and nymphs infected or uninfected with CLas ACP, whose expression, if reduced or abated altogether, might impede CLas-psyllid host interactions essential for viable circulative, propagative transmission of CLas, thereby preventing transmission to the plant host.
Materials and Methods
Psyllid colonies
The ACP CLas-infected and—uninfected colonies were reared in laboratory cultures maintained on a CLas host (Citrus spp.) (CLas-infected) or a CLas- immune rutaceous plant species (CLas-free). Cultures were reared continuously and serially transferred periodically to the same host species at the University of Florida Citrus Research and Education Center (courtesy, Dr. K.S. Pelz-Stelinski, Lake Alfred, FL) or at the Southwest Florida Research and Education Center (courtesy, Dr. P.A. Stansly, Immokalee, FL). Adults and nymphs (2–5 instar) were collected so that the most complete whole transcriptome data set could be generated over a complete range of adult and nymph life stages representing complete cohorts, minus the first instar, which was too small to obtain near-equal body weight in comparison to the other nymphal instars. Live psyllids were collected from colonies and processed by crushing the bodies lightly in RNA-free tubes using a micro-pestle, followed by the addition of Trizol. Samples were shipped on dry ice to Washington State University where they were stored at -80°C until use.
Total RNA isolation and quality control
Total RNA was extracted from 100 CLas-infected (WbL) and—uninfected (Wb) ACP adults and from 225 CLas-infected (NyL) and—uninfected (Ny) ACP nymphs, respectively. Samples were ground in liquid nitrogen with a micro-pestle followed by resuspension in 1 ml Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) each. For RNA extraction, 0.3 ml chloroform were added to 1 ml Trizol homogenate, followed by vigorous sample shaking for 30s, which was then allowed to sit for 3 min at room temperature. The samples were centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 15 min at 4°C to separate the organic from the aqueous phase. The aqueous phase (200–250 μl) was transferred to a sterile, RNase-free tube, and an equal volume of 100% RNA-free ethanol was added and mixed. The RNA was purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of the psyllid RNA was analyzed using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE) and the optical density readings were used to calculate the A260/A280 ratio (~2.0). The RNA was quantified on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 RNA Nanochip (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA) to ensure sufficient RNA (minimum, 2 μg) was available for cDNA synthesis and Illumina DNA sequencing for library construction.
Library construction and Illumina sequencing
Poly(A) RNA was isolated from 2 μg of total RNA purified from each sample using magnetic oligo (dT) beads. The mRNAs were fragmented into short sequences by treatment with a zinc-containing solution at 94°C for 5 min according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cleaved poly(A) RNA was transcribed to synthesize the first strand cDNA using random primers, followed by second-strand cDNA synthesis, end-repair and phosphorylation, and the addition of an ‘A’ base to the 3ʹ blunt end of the phosphorylated DNA fragments. The cDNA was ligated to Illumina Paired-end adapters using Illumina’s kit following manufacturer’s recommendations. The adapter-ligated products were purified on a gel to select a template size range of 250 bp ± 25 bp for downstream enrichment. The cDNA fragments were amplified using the PCR primers, PE 1.0 and PE 2.0 (Illumina), which are designed to anneal to the ends of the adapters, using the PCR program of 30 s at 98°C followed by 15 cycles of 10 s at 98°C, 30 s at 60°C, 15 s at 72°C and a final elongation step of 5 min at 72°C. The products were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) to construct an Illumina paired end library. Library quality control was performed with a Bioanalyzer DNA 1000 Chip Series II (Agilent). Analysis by qPCR was employed to quantify the libraries before generating the clusters. The paired-end libraries were applied to a flowcell on a cBOT (Illumina) to generate clusters, and subjected to DNA sequencing using a 2×54 bp format on an Illumina Genome Analyzer II at the National Center for Genome Resources (Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 USA). The complete dataset has been deposited to the Short Read Archive (SRA) at GenBank, as the Accession numbers PRJNA243541, SRX525230, SRX525218, SRX525209 and SRX525152.
Assembly and annotation of Illumina sequences
The Illumina reads were cleaned and assembled as described by He et al. [36]. Briefly, the reads were assembled with ABySS [37], the gaps were filled using the GapCloser in SOAP [38], the scaffolds merged with Mira [39] and filtered for redundancies with Cd-hit [40], and finally, the reads were aligned post hoc to the final contig consensus sequences using Burrows-Wheeler algorithm (BWA) [41].
The contigs and read counts per library were analyzed using TCW software [42]. Contigs were annotated using an E-value cutoff of 1E-10 against an invertebrate, bacterial, and virus database derived from the UniProt database, and the GO terms extracted from the “.dat” files [43]. The significantly differentially expressed contigs for individual contigs and those grouped in GO categories were determined by edgeR [44] and GOSeq analysis [45], respectively.
The TCW was used to compile Figs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, Tables 1, 2 and 3, and all Supplementary Figures (S1 and S2 Figs) and Tables (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, and S9 Tables). The TCW Filter Query was used to compile Fig 2 by selecting contigs based on fold change in RPKM value (reads per kilobase, per million mapped reads), an expression measure normalized against library size and length of transcript (in ‘Libraries’), differential expression p-values with cutoff limit of 0.05, and annotation status (in ‘Best Hit’). The TCW Filter Query was also used to obtain the contig sequences required to compile Figs 3, 6, and 7 and S1, S2, S6 and S9 Tables by exporting the translated open reading frames of selected contigs. The contigs were mapped to the various biochemical pathways in the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) Automatic Annotation Server (KASS) using the BBH (bi-directional best hit) method, which implements BLAST comparisons against a set of orthologous groups in KEGG GENES, resulting in KEGG Orthology (KO) assignments and Enzyme Commission (EC) distributions (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kaas/) [46]. The following three data sets were submitted to KAAS: 1) all of the translated ACP contigs, 2) the translated contigs differentially expressed (p<0.05) between CLas-free nymph (Ny) and CLas-infected nymph comparisons (NyL), and 3) the translated contigs differentially expressed (p<0.05) between CLas-free adult (Wb) and CLas-infected adult comparisons (WbL).
Table 1. Summary of DNA sequencing, assembly, and annotation of Asian citrus psyllid transcript libraries.
Sequencing (clean reads) | Wb | 21,552,866 |
WbL | 46,865,913 | |
Ny | 32,265,958 | |
NyL | 28,947,167 | |
Total | 129,631,904 | |
Assembly | Total contigs | 45,976 |
Mean length (range) (bp) | 1,107 (150–26,540) | |
% GC (range) | 40.4 (10.4–77.9) | |
Annotation | Total annotated contigs (%) | 17,958 (39%) |
Unique hits | 293,195 | |
1st Best hits | 9,352 | |
Total hits | 700,796 | |
Mean length (range) (bp) | 1,980 (150–26,540) | |
% GC (range) | 44.0 (12.3–77.9) | |
E-value (range) | 7.52E-13 (0–1.0E-13) |
Wb = Whole adult body, Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas)-uninfected; WbL = Whole adult body, CLas-infected; Ny = nymphal instars, CLas-uninfected; NyL = nymphal instars, CLas-infected. The consensus transcript sequences are expressed as reads per KB per million reads, or RPKM units.
Table 2. Differentially expressed contigs from pairwise comparisons of the Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus-uninfected adult and nymphal instars of the Asian citrus psyllid.
Transcript Id | Adult/Nymph (RPKM) | Length | % GC | E-value | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DcWN_19757 | 3493 | 651 | 42 | 1.00E-23 | Serine protease easter |
DcWN_20608 | 2103 | 1132 | 43.3 | 4.00E-56 | Serine protease easter |
DcWN_31964 | 1543 | 5286 | 36.3 | 8.00E-20 | AGAP008244-PA |
DcWN_19289 | 1396 | 733 | 43.9 | 6.00E-22 | Cysteine protease 6 |
DcWN_32183 | 713 | 742 | 62.2 | 9.00E-65 | Uncharacterized protein |
DcWN_17954 | 559 | 722 | 42.3 | 6.00E-13 | Vitellogenin-1 |
DcWN_14150 | 517 | 1028 | 40.8 | 1.00E-37 | Uncharacterized protein |
DcWN_30459 | 474 | 1660 | 34.9 | 3.00E-79 | Reverse transcriptase, putative |
DcWN_22081 | 446 | 491 | 25.2 | 5.00E-64 | Acetolactate synthase large subunit |
DcWN_04909 | 389 | 2969 | 34.6 | 5.00E-16 | Intracellular protein transport protein USO1, putative |
DcWN_22191 | 363 | 779 | 41.4 | 1.00E-22 | Protein takeout, putative |
DcWN_38201 | 344 | 371 | 24.5 | 4.00E-17 | 50S ribosomal protein L32 |
DcWN_11262 | 338 | 3415 | 34.1 | 3.00E-22 | Bifunctional endo-1,4-beta-xylanase xylA, putative |
DcWN_38687 | 330 | 430 | 23 | 3.00E-59 | DNA polymerase III epsilon subunit |
DcWN_24273 | 321 | 568 | 45.4 | 4.00E-17 | Putative uncharacterized protein |
DcWN_33049 | 303 | 228 | 32.8 | 1.00E-30 | Dihydroxy-acid dehydratase |
DcWN_31527 | 298 | 254 | 71.2 | 3.00E-15 | Putative uncharacterized protein |
DcWN_07852 | 295 | 1774 | 28.8 | 0 | Mixed type I polyketide synthase-peptide synthetase |
DcWN_27346 | 261 | 530 | 29.8 | 4.00E-52 | DNA primase |
DcWN_06117 | 258 | 1373 | 42.9 | 1.00E-37 | Hemolymph proteinase 8 |
DcWN_33624 | 221 | 385 | 23.6 | 2.00E-38 | DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta' |
DcWN_25533 | 220 | 615 | 34.1 | 9.00E-11 | S-antigen protein |
DcWN_35765 | 219 | 311 | 24.7 | 7.00E-28 | DNA-directed RNA polymerase |
DcWN_24274 | 206 | 2680 | 46.7 | 2.00E-41 | LRRC48-like protein |
DcWN_16249 | 199 | 873 | 63.2 | 2.00E-58 | Glutathione peroxidase |
DcWN_03031 | 191 | 4682 | 31.4 | 5.00E-44 | Viral A-type inclusion protein, putative |
DcWN_40242 | 190 | 380 | 56.8 | 2.00E-27 | DnaJ domain containing protein, related |
DcWN_16525 | 179 | 1305 | 65.4 | 9.00E-62 | Serine O-acetyltransferase |
DcWN_22727 | 172 | 985 | 38.1 | 5.00E-95 | Transferrin |
DcWN_16592 | 149 | 1466 | 38.1 | 5.00E-23 | Ubiquitin-protein ligase bre1, putative |
Table 3. RT-PCR results of 10 selected ACP transcripts usedselected subjected to validation by RT-PCR, cloning, and sequencing of RNA isolated from Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus-infected adult psyllids demonstrate the integrity of contigs in the database.
Transcript ID (length bp) 1 | Predicted Annotation (E-value) 2 | UniProt Id | CLas effect on expression 3 | Primer Sequences 5'-3', forward/reverse | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nymph | Adult | ||||
DcWN_04644 | ABC transporter | E0VTI8_PEDHC | -4.6 | -1.6 | GCGGGATCCATGACCATCCCTCGAAACCAA |
(1947) | (2E-74) | GCGGGGCCCTCACATAGATTTCTTATATTTAAC | |||
DcWN_34339 | Sugar transporter 1 | C6KIB0_9HEMI | -1.8 | -4.4 | GCGTCTAGAATGGCGGCAGAGACAAAGAT |
(1437) | (3E-69) | GCGGGGCCCTTAGGCGGCAGCGACACCT | |||
DcWN_34586 | Putative ferritin 2 | Q4PLJ6_ANOGL | 1.2 | -1.5 | GCGTCTAGAATGAATTCAGTACTACTGAATC |
(750) | (8E-23) | Q4PLJ6_ANOGL | GCGGGGCCCTTAGGCGGCAGCGACACCT | ||
DcWN_18755 | Cathepsin B | A9JSH3_MYZPE | -1.5 | -1.4 | GCGTCTAGAATGTTGAATCGTCTGGTCCTA |
(453) | (2E-106) | GCGGGGCCCGAGATCATCCGATGACAGA | |||
DcWN_16937 | Glutathione S-transferase | GST1_BLAGE | -1.1 | 1.9 | GCGTCTAGAATGCCGTCTTACAAGCTGTA |
(612) | (2E-21) | GCGGGGCCCTTAGACTTCGGATTTGGGGCGCT | |||
DcWN_13848 | Ras-related protein Rac1 | RAC1_DROME | -2.2 | -2.0 | GCGTCTAGAATGCAAGCCATAAAGTGTGT |
(589) | (4E-7) | GCGGGGCCCTTACAGGAGCACGCAGCGTTT | |||
DcWN_02176 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase A | E2AGG6_CAMFO | -2.8 | 1.3 | GGAAGGTTCGGCAAAGTGTA |
(409) | (0) | CGAAGTCTCCCAGCTTCAAA | |||
DcWN_05944 | Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | GPDM_CAEEL | 1.6 | -2.6 | TGGCCCATTATTGGAAAGAA |
(389) | (0) | CGAATGTCGTTGATGGACAC | |||
DcWN_07021 | G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 | GPRK2_DROME | -3.7 | -1.8 | ACTGTTCAACGATTGCATGG |
(537) | (0) | CCCAGGTCTGAAATCCTCAC | |||
DcWN_13699 | Aquaporin AQPcic | AQP_CICVR | -1.2 | 1.4 | CTCGAAGCAGTCACACCAAA |
(307) | (5E-80) | TGCCCAGTAAACCCAAATGT |
1. Size of amplicon deposited in GenBank [GenBank: KF907310-KF907319].
2. Description and annotation of the best hit (E-value -10) from UniProt.
3. Numbers represent fold-change in RPKM values. The fold-change ration was determined using TCW.
The TCW Basic GO Query was used to compile Figs 4, 5, and 8 and S3, S4, S7 and S8 Tables, as follows: the histogram (Fig 4) was obtained by selecting for all contigs at GO level 2 and plotting the number of contigs against each category. The significance of the differentially expressed contigs was determined based on p-values, using a cutoff limit of 0.05. Significant differentially expressed contigs (p<0.05) are marked with an asterisk. S3 and S4 Tables were generated by selecting for categories that were differentially expressed at p<10−10 for the Ny/Wb, NyL/WbL, and Ny/NyL. The p-value cutoff implemented for the Wb/WbL comparisons was less stringent (p<10−5) to gain a greater range of values for potentially differentially expressed. For the data shown in Fig 5, the database option for up- and down-regulated contigs for the filter query was used to identify the number of up and down regulated contigs using the specific GO ID for each GO category. Also a p-value cut off of 0.05 was considered for all queries. The sum of the up- and down-regulated was subtracted from the total number of contigs in each GO category, and the values obtained were expressed as a percentage and are represented on the pie chart for each pairwise library comparison. A ratio ≥1.5 was considered up-regulated, whereas, ratios of ≤ 0.8 were considered to be down-regulated contigs [47]. Fold change values were determined by ‘including’ and ‘excluding’ the specific libraries of interest using the TCW Filter query. In Fig 8, the GO category results for the search term “Gene silencing” were obtained for all contigs at all GO levels with the duplicates removed, and the number of contigs was represented in a histogram. The identification of differentially expressed genes was based on a p-value cut off of 0.05, and the significant categories were represented by an asterisk (Fig 8).
The transposon search results (Fig 9) were compiled from the hits that matched the search terms: transposon, TE, retroelement, and transposons. This was done by using the multiple term database search option to maximize the number of hits relating to transposons, because the nomenclature is variable for different groups of transposons depending on the TE class, and whether it is an RNA or DNA TE [48]. Individual contigs that were annotated by the same element were identified, and a single transcript for each was included among the representative contigs reported for each transposon type. Expression levels for transposon hits are shown in histogram for each corresponding library, and fold-change was plotted for comparisons of interest using a line graph and a differential expression p-value cut-off of 0.05 with “significance” indicated by an asterisk (Fig 9).
Assessment of selected psyllid contigs by RT-PCR and DNA sequencing
To assess the overall integrity of psyllid contigs in the TCW database, primers were designed to amplify a subset of contigs using reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) for mRNA amplification, followed by cloning and bidirectional DNA sequencing of 3 clones per amplicon (Table 3). The contigs were selected based on predicted biological functions of interest and differential gene expression profiles (in silico) in nymphs and adults in response to CLas infection. The sequence for each putative contig was uploaded to FGENESH, a web-based software (http://linux1.softberry.com/berry.phtml) to predict the eukaryotic coding region by homology to other insect reference sequences.
Total RNA was extracted from ACP adults with Trizol according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR was performed using the SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR system and Platinum Taq High Fidelity enzyme. The cDNA synthesis reaction (50 μl volume) contained 25 μl 2X reaction Mix, 10 μM each primer, 2 μl SuperScript III RT/ Platinum Taq, HiFi Mix, 100–200 ng of RNA template, and DEPC-treated water. After cDNA synthesis at 50°C for 30 min, and a denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min, PCR amplification was conducted using 40 cycles of 94°C for 20 s, 53–60°C for 20 s, and 68°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 68°C for 5 min.
The RT-PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis in TAE buffer, pH 8.0. RT-PCR products were precipitated by adding 2 X volume of 100% ethanol and 2 μl of glycogen. The precipitated products were washed twice with 70% ethanol, resuspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), ligated into pGEM-T Easy vector, and transformed into JM109 competent cells. The cloned inserts were verified by colony PCR amplification and DNA sequencing using M13 forward and reverse primers. The colony PCR products were purified with the GeneJET plasmid Miniprep Kit (Fermentas) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and DNA sequencing was carried out at the University of Arizona Genetics Core Facility (Tucson, AZ USA). A consensus transcript (contig) sequence was submitted to the GenBank database as the Accession numbers KF907310-KF907319.
Results
Illumina sequencing, assembly and annotation
Polyadenylated ACP RNA was isolated and used to construct four Illumina paired-end sequencing libraries, from pools of CLas-free whole adult bodies (Wb) or nymphs (Ny) (instar stages 2–5) or from CLas-infected adult (WbL) or nymph (NyL) psyllids. Sequencing was carried out as described in the Methods and produced 129,631,904 clean reads total, with 21,552,866 for Wb, 46,865,913 for WbL, 32,265,958 for Ny, and 28,947,167 for NyL. Reads were assembled, yielding 45,976 contiguous sequences (contigs), which represent potential transcripts. The average GC content of the contigs was 44.4% (range of 10.4–77.9%) with the contig length ranging from 150 to 26,540 bp (87% > 200 bp, 57% >500 bp, and 37% >1000 bp; S1 Fig). Reads were mapped back to the contigs to compute the quantitative expression level for each. The average number of reads mapped to contigs was 2,819, with an average of 149 reads per RPKM for the combined libraries. Of the 45,976 contigs, a relatively small number were found to be uniquely present in only one library. These included 55 contigs in Wb, 80 in Ny, 206 in WbL, and 117 NyL (Table 1).
The contigs were annotated based on comparison to the UniProt invertebrate, bacterial, and virus databases with 10−10 as the BLAST cutoff. Thirty-nine percent (17,598) of contigs had at least one hit. The average E-value was 7.52×10−13 and 98% of the best hits to ACP contigs were other invertebrate sequences.
Approximately 26% of the ACP invertebrate-associated contigs shared greatest homology equally with the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) Order: Hemiptera and the human body louse Pediculus humanus capitis (L.) genome sequence Order: Phthiraptera (S2 Fig). Similar results were reported for annotated potato psyllid transcripts [33]. The remaining 2% of annotated contigs shared greatest homology with bacterial sequences for two previously identified endosymbionts of psyllids, Ca. Carsonella ruddii [49] and Wolbachia, [50], and with other insect viruses that shared high sequence identity to baculoviruses and transposable elements.
Differential expression, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) analyses
The TCW was used to identify psyllid genes that were differentially expressed for ACP harboring or free of CLas. The analyses were based on pairwise comparisons of within-and-between differences among transcript expression levels for each library-treatment combination, CLas-infected compared to-uninfected nymph or adult stage ACP. Approximately 36% of the total contigs were differentially expressed, and of these 14% were annotatable (Fig 2A). Among the annotated contigs the majority of differential expression was 10-fold or more for all possible treatment comparisons e.g. life stage (nymphs and adults) and CLas presence/absence (Fig 2B).
Using KEGG pathway analyses software and databases, which predict and map biological-functional interrelationships between genes, the ACP contig assignments spanned 330 pathways [46]. Of these 17% (55) and 83% (275) were associated with metabolic and non-metabolic pathways, respectively (S1 Table). Purine, carbon, pyrimidine, glycerophospholipid, and choline metabolism were among the top KEGG metabolic-associated pathways. Among the non-metabolic pathways the top 10 reflected disease- and viral-infection associated pathways, and endocytosis. The Endocytosis pathway is of interest because it is used by other pathogens for host invasion [33, 51]. Of the 76 psyllid contigs identified in this pathway, eighteen and 7 were significantly (p<0.05) differentially expressed in response to CLas in ACP nymphs and adults, respectively (Fig 3, S2 Table). This result may reflect the requirement for CLas invasion of first the nymph and then the adult stage, respectively, in the propagative, circulative life (infection) cycle in the psyllid host. These results suggest that the host genes are more highly targeted by CLas during invasion of the immature instars compared to adult psyllids. Further, clathrin, a protein involved in the selective internalization of molecules during receptor-mediated endocytosis [52], was significantly down-regulated in both the nymphal and adult life stages. In RNAi knockdown experiments, reduced clathrin expression resulted in a 5-fold decrease in invasion of human epithelial cells by E. coli and S. aureus [53]. By analogy ACP may modify its gene expression as a defense against CLas invasion.
The classification of ACP contigs was based on GO categories (Fig 4). The level-1 GO distribution was highest for the Biological Processes with 57.5% of transcripts, followed by Cellular Components with 24.5%, and Molecular Function with 18%. The level-2 GO assignments were dispersed among 46 GO categories.
The majority of transcripts assigned to Biological Processes GO category were distributed among the Biological Regulation, Cellular Processes, Developmental Processes, and Metabolic Processes (Fig 4). The Cellular Component GO category contained transcripts in the sub-categories: Cell, Macromolecular Complex, Membrane, and Organelle. Most of the transcripts in the Binding and Catalytic Activity category contained transcripts representing Molecular Function. The collective results mirror the dynamic lifestyle of ACP, and its capacity to adapt to different environments. Categories that were significant as far as differential expression among different treatments is concerned are discussed further.
Perhaps unexpectedly, the comparative transcript profiles suggested that psyllids generally tolerate CLas-infection, and is based on the observation that most ACP transcripts were not significantly differentially expressed (Fig 5; p<0.05; fold change ratios of < 2 are considered unchanged). Such a pattern suggests that ACP adults and nymphs are relatively well adapted to CLas infection and perhaps that this symbiotic relationship is evolutionarily longstanding. Even so, the ACP nymphs showed more changes in gene expression than the adults (Fig 5), suggesting that the early psyllid life-stages are critical targets for invasion, multiplication, circulation, and perhaps salivary gland-mediated acquisition. This also could suggest that adults have evolved reasonably high tolerance to CLas infection owing to a long-standing host-parasite relationship [2, 21]. One possibility is that CLas primarily exploits the nymphal over the adult stages, to invade and establish systemically and to a high titer, during vulnerable but highly metabolically active stages of growth and development. In this way it would already occupy surviving adult organs and perhaps be able to down-regulate pathogenesis-related activities during psyllid adulthood to ensure the reproduction of and transmission by its psyllid host, both which would be undermined if resources were depleted.
It is well known that ACP adults reared on CLas-free plants are not competent vectors of the bacterium to citrus plants, even when given acquisition-access to CLas [18]. Based on these results, adults may be entirely incapable of transmitting CLas unless they ingest and/or acquire it during the late nymphal and/or early adult stages. Taken together with the results reported herein, we hypothesize that adult-mediated CLas transmission depends on nymphal infection with acquisition occurring in the adult stage, in order to achieve a titer threshold sufficient to invade late-nymphal and/or adult psyllid salivary glands to assure CLas inoculum to be transmitted the plant host by its vector. Perhaps when these or other scenarios are borne out through additional studies, the higher number of significantly up- and down-regulated contigs observed here in response to CLas infection of nymphs (Fig 5A–5C) over adults (Fig 5D–5F) will be more definitive. Even so, the particular groups of differentially expressed transcripts already offer interesting clues that, at least in part, support the above hypotheses, in that among the major GO categories were Biological Process (28% in adults and 39% in nymphs, respectively), Cellular Component (27% in adults and 40% in nymphs, respectively) and Molecular Function (28% in adults and 39% in nymphs, respectively). The significant down-regulation of immunity and defense genes, observed particularly in the nymphal stages, could possibly render ACP nymphs more permissive (susceptible) than adults to CLas invasion and multiplication, thereby facilitating CLas spread into key anatomical sites in the late-stage nymph and/or early adult stage such that acquisition occurs by the time young adults become mobile, reproduce, and transmit the bacterium to the flush growth of the host plant.
Contigs associated with differences between adult and nymph developmental stages
The contigs having the greatest differential expression in the CLas-free adults and nymphs (based on RPKM values) represent genes utilized in behavioral responses, cell differentiation, development, and growth (Table 2), and include acetolactate synthase, apyrase, arginine kinase, arylsulfatase, cysteine proteinase, glutathione peroxidase, polyketide synthase, serine protease ester, transferrin, and vitellogenin. For example, arginine kinase expression was upregulated by ~70-fold in adults compared to nymphs, and perhaps is not surprising because it is an enzyme involved in cellular energy metabolism [54]. This is consistent with the adult stage requirement for maximum energy essential for reproduction dispersal, and survival during shortages of food, whereas, nymphs are able to feed immediately and consistently for the most part where they are borne.
The ACP nymphal genes found to be overexpressed by greater than 10-fold were calmodulin, hedgehog, survivin, talin 2 and wnt. Such genes are known to be activated during energy-intensive processes including development, cell and tissue differentiation, growth, and molting in nymphs [55–58]. In addition to wnt, twenty-one other contigs were identified in the Hedgehog signaling pathway, constituting 85% of the predicted pathway members (S1 Table). Additionally, arylphorin-type storage protein, acyl-CoA delta-11 desaturase, lazarillo protein, and a cuticle protein were up-regulated in nymphs. In particular insect cuticle proteins are temporally regulated, and are up-regulated during tissue-specific cell differentiation during molting and metamorphosis [59]. Arylphorin storage proteins are ubiquitous in insects, have high aromatic amino acid content, and support growth and development, particularly in larval hemolymph-defense responses [60]. And, acyl-CoA delta-11 desaturase catalyzes the formation of delta (11) fatty acyl precursors for phospholipid membrane incorporation and modulation of membrane fluidity, a primary adaptive cellular response [61].
Overall, the gene expression patterns for nymph and adult comparisons reflected distinct global patterns of protein and energy requirements of both the immature and adult life stages, whereas, expression level comparisons between CLas-uninfected and—infected psyllids underscored infection-specific genes. Of particular interest for RNA-interference (silencing) objectives, therefore, are genes involved in initial CLas invasion of the psyllid gut, gut establishment, systemic spread into and throughout the hemolymph and other organs, and for CLas entry and/or proliferation in the salivary glands.
Contigs of interest with altered expression in CLas-infected ACP nymphs
In early nymphal stage(s) (1–3) following CLas infection (not taking into account possible transovarial transmission), expression profiles (herein) and preliminary results of electron microscopic analyses (authors, unpublished), the bacterium appears to have established and persisted in most tissues and organs. Examples of CLas effectors alluded to based on the expression profiles were candidates with likely (putative) involvement in invasion and pathogenicity. Among them were proteins essential for cellular adhesion, biofilm formation, motility, and circulation in the hemolymph, presumably en route to the oral region/salivary glands [8, 9]. Also, genes involved in development, morphogenesis, and innate immunity were prominently overexpressed in the nymphal instars (S3 and S4 Tables); results that strongly suggested CLas is capable of suppressing basal immunity, which could modulate nymphal development and affect immature stadia longevity in ways that are beneficial to CLas invasion, multiplication, and circulation during early stage infection of its psyllid host.
Adhesion/Invasion-related contigs
Consistent with the circulative, propagative transmission hypothesis, laminin isoforms were upregulated in CLas-infected compared to the uninfected ACP nymphs. Because laminins are essential for dermal membrane formation during development [62], their up-regulation could represent a response to membrane formation disruption by CLas while entering or exiting cell, tissue, or organellar membranes.
In addition, vinculin was down-regulated in the infected nymphs. Vinculin links the actin cytoskeleton to adhesion receptors in focal adhesions and adherence junctions [63]. Talin, a protein known to contain vinculin binding sites [64] was also down-regulated in infected nymphs. Interestingly, the Rap 1 signaling pathway, which involves talin, and regulates focal adhesion dynamics (Fig 6), was among the top 25 non-metabolic KEGG pathways (S1 Table). During invasion Shigella species modulates host vinculin expression to promote infection [65], making its down-regulation potentially important in CLas invasion processes. Certain Rickettsia spp. express a talin mimic to gain entry into the host cell [66]. These results suggest that both vinculin and talin could be important for CLas invasion. Further, down-regulation of psyllid gene expression in such inter-related pathways provides important clues to the effect that CLas appears to modulate cytoskeleton networks to gain access to intercellular and intracellular space in its host, while also enhancing its persistence.
Defense/Immune response-related contigs
A matrix protein gene required for wound healing, tenascin [67], and semaphorin, known to be involved in axon guidance and immunity in insects [68] were both down-regulated in infected ACP nymphs (S5 Table). Wound healing in psyllid organs at sites of bacterial entry or exit could restrict CLas to particular areas, and if so, the CLas-mediated interference with wound-healing proteins would hold open and make accessible such sites. Further, the expression of cathepsin B, a protease-like enzyme utilized during molting and stress in insects [69], was reduced in infected nymphs (Table 3) potentially giving CLas a positive advantage if ACP-encoded proteolytic enzymes are used by the host to defend against CLas invasion. An ABC transporter-like gene was also down-regulated in ACP nymphs (p<0.01, see Table 3). ABC transporters are integral membrane proteins that transport solutes across membranes via ATP hydrolysis whereas others are involved in maintenance or RNA and DNA repair in the cytosol [70]. Mutations in an ABC transporter of Heliothis virescens were associated with its resistance to attack by the bacterial pathogen Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) [71] by preventing Bt toxin binding to the membrane. Down-regulation of ABC transporters in infected nymphs may be regulated by CLas to gain advantage by interfering with host membrane transport, or the host itself may have responded by counter attack, perhaps to undermine the transport of damaging CLas-imposed compounds such as anti-bacterial peptides.
Nutrition-related contigs
Chitinase was up-regulated in CLas-infected nymphs (S5 Table). Many bacteria, including Listeria monocytogenes and Vibrio cholerae, which are animal pathogens [72, 73], and Xylella fastidiosa, a phytopathogenic bacterium transmitted by certain planthoppers in a non-circular manner [74], hydrolyze and utilize host chitin for a nutrition. Chitinases also enhance bacterial virulence by suppressing host innate immunity [73]. Accordingly, Liberibacter effectors may interact with or stimulate these and other enzymatic activities during infection to facilitate CLas access to psyllid organs.
Apolipophorin is a protein required for dietary lipid transport and required for insect flight [75] and also has been associated with virulence of certain pathogens. In the silkworm, apolipophorins inhibit hemolysin expression in Staphylococcus aureus to combat bacterial virulence [76]. Apolipophorin expression in CLas-infected nymphs was down-regulated (S5 Table), indicating that CLas could affect lipid transport, thereby reducing the availability of dietary lipids essential for membrane synthesis, thus rendering nymphs susceptible to CLas invasion.
Transferrin, a glycoprotein required for iron transport [77], is recognized by bacterial outer membrane receptors of transferrin-iron complexes, which internalize iron without the use of siderophores [78], was down-regulated in CLas-infected nymphs (Table 2). Also, transferrin is a recognized as a virulence determinant for Wuchereria bancroftti, the causal agent of elephantiasis, which is transmitted by the Aedes aegyptti in a circulative-propagative manner [79]. These observations suggest that CLas alters the local host environment such that nutrients are more freely available for its use. Also, ACP expression of ferritin, a storage protein for non-toxic forms of iron [80], was up-regulated in infected nymphs (Table 3), suggesting that they sequester free forms of iron, which could lead to iron starvation of CLas as a means of combatting nymphal infection.
Contigs of interest with altered expression in CLas-infected ACP adults
After the last molt e.g. from the 5th nymphal instar to adult, the young adults (tenerals) are not yet mature. Within several days tenerals mature into adults and the physiological processes shift to storing carbohydrates and fats for dispersal and reproduction. The nutritional needs of adults differ from those of nymphs, which typically remain associated with the plant on which they were born. Adult psyllids must survive hardships and environmental stresses during dispersal and reproduction, and this is dependent upon the overall health of young adults that aids them in locating nutritionally optimal food sources. Expression profiles provided a strong indication that the defense and immune response genes of CLas-infected adults were more robustly expressed compared to the nymphs, even though all stages are infected. This suggests that ACP adults, over nymphs, have a more robust immune system against CLas, either because adults are better able to overcome infection pressures, and/or that perhaps late in the infection cycle CLas does not strongly modulate adult immunity, or both.
Adhesion/Invasion-related contigs
More than 1,700 contigs were assigned to the Biological Adhesion and Extracellular Matrix categories (Fig 4) and are of interest because of their possible roles in supporting the propagative, circulative relationship of CLas with its host. The accumulation of CLas occurs in regions of the CLas-infected alimentary canal [8, 9] and lesions apparent on the external surface through which bacteria appear to exit. Thus, CLas infection requires bacterial adhesion to psyllid membranes and other surfaces, and that it interacts with the cellular matrix and membrane proteins. Among the differentially expressed genes, a protein involved in basal membrane formation, papilin, was down-regulated in CLas-infected adults (S5 Table). In C. elegans, the suppression of papilin expression was lethal to the embryos owing to the disruption of basement membrane formation [81]. Thus the down-regulation of papilin-like transcripts in CLas-infected psyllid adults suggests this protein may be utilized by CLas during initial invasion and possibly systemic spread in the psyllid. Also, several additional proteins with potential involvement in CLas invasion of ACP were differentially expressed (S5 Table) including integrin, a type of cell adhesion molecule [82] involved in innate immunity, echinoid that functions in cell adhesion and cell sorting [83], and fibrillins, which are structural proteins integral to microfibrils in tissues and muscles [84]. The basis for CLas-mediated down-regulation of the expression of these particular genes is unknown, however, (putatively) weakened muscles and other tissues known to facilitate adhesion and infection processes may provide an explanation.
Defense/Immune response-related contigs
Many differentially expressed genes were assigned to the GO categories: Antibiotic Biosynthetic Process, Encapsulation of Foreign Target, Extracellular Matrix, Melanization Defense Response, and Response to Topologically Incorrect Protein, which are commonly involved in defense responses. For example, phenoloxidase, which is required for melanization [85] was down-regulated (S5 Table) suggesting CLas suppression of the ACP immune system. Also, hemocytin, a blood protein involved insect humoral responses and that shares homology with the mammalian von-Willebrand factor of like function [86] was down-regulated in CLas-infected adults (S5 Table). It is possible that CLas effectors interact with hemocytin to modulate circulation in psyllid hemolymph to systemically infect the host.
Rac1, a member of the Rho family of GTPases that operate as molecular switches to regulate immunity, actin dynamics, gene transcription, and cell cycle progression [87], was up-regulated (Table 3, Fig 6, S6 Table) in CLas-infected adults. In other insects attacked by parasitoids and pathogens, Rac1 up-regulation [88] has been linked to hemocyte recruitment [89, 90]. Expression of Jun N-terminus kinase (JNK)-like and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAKK)-like genes (Table 3) were up-regulated in ACP. These proteins act in signaling pathways that regulate apoptosis, cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and stress response, and are activated by Rac-1(Fig 6) [91], signaling activation of the immune system to counter CLas invasion.
Finally, a number of immune-related contigs (S7 Table) shared similarities with those identified previously in the pea aphid [92, 93], which has a relatively ‘limited’ immune system. It has been suggested that the innate immune system has evolved in a way so as to reduce attack on the primary and secondary endosymbionts that provide essential amino acids, hormones, and nutrients [92–94]. In contrast, honeybee larvae able to express a complete repertoire of immune proteins were unable to defend themselves against the bee pathogen Paenibacillus larvae even though during the adult stages bees were resistant to bacterial infection [95]. Thus despite a robust immune system all stages do not counter pathogen attack equally.
Nutrition-related contigs
Expression analysis identified 14 ACP contigs assigned to the Nutrient Reservoir Activity GO category (Fig 4). These are of potential interest because of their involvement in nutritional support for CLas establishment, invasion of the gut, hemolymph. For example, hexamerin, an amino acid storage protein [96], was down-regulated in CLas-infected adults (S5 Table) suggesting that CLas may modulate free amino acid availability by interfering with hexamerin storage pathways by regulating expression of amino acid storage protein genes.
Vitellogenin-1 expression also was responsive to CLas infection of ACP (Table 2). Vitellogenins are glycoproteins that serve as a rich source of nutrients, are a major egg protein, and are up-regulated in some insects in response to stress [97]. In ACP, vitellogenin was down-regulated unexpectedly, suggesting that CLas may deprive ACP of this protein. Although somewhat speculative, this is supported by evidence of reduced oviposition and fecundity in the related Liberibacter-potato psyllid pathosystem [98], and is consistent with pathogen-induced host manipulation known in somewhat analogous systems, including the Anopheles-Plasmodium and Tenebrio molitor beetle-tapeworm complexes [99, 100].
Differential impact of CLas infection on immature and adult psyllids
Comparisons of expression profiles of the adult and nymph ACP life stages revealed stage-specific differences and new insights into CLas invasion tactics, particularly involving defense responses (S5 Table). Among these were aldo-keto reductase, chorion peroxidase, and intracellular protein transport protein USO1 [101, 102].
Gene silencing-related contigs
In other insect defense systems, immune deficiency (IMD) and Toll pathways are known to combat fungal and bacterial pathogens, whereas, the RNA interference (RNAi) pathways are implemented primarily to combat viruses [103]. Also, microRNAs (miRNAs) or small RNA molecules associated with insect RNAi-antiviral pathways [104] are expressed during Wolbachia infection of the mosquito Aedes agypti to strategically modulate gene expression of its host [28]. The MicroRNAs in cancer pathway was among the top 40 non-metabolic KEGG pathways (S1 Table). Also, several contigs involved in controlling gene expression, post-transcriptionally, by the RNA degradation pathway were differentially expressed in CLas-infected nymphs and adults (Fig 7).
Importantly, contigs assigned to RNAi-related GO functional categories (Fig 8) were found to be present, making this the first report of RNAi machinery in ACP. Expression levels of RNAi-related transcripts were down-regulated to a greater extent in CLas-infected nymphs compared to adults (S8 Table). Also, the antiviral helicase Ski2, a gene involved RNA degradation (Fig 7, S9 Table), including decay of mRNA targeted by the RISC complex [105], was up- and down-regulated in nymphs and adults, respectively, indicating life stage differences in post-transcriptional processing. Even though RNAi machinery is active in both adults and nymphs, whether it modulates CLas invasion of one or both life stages as a pre-requisite for adult-mediated transmission [18], is unclear.
Genes sharing similarity to regulator of the nonsense transcript 1 homolog, PIWI, and SID1-like proteins were down-regulated in nymphs compared to adults. Potentially, knock-down of PIWI, a component of the PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway involved in transposon silencing, may result in genome instability mediated by transposable element (TE) de-repression [106]. The expression levels of DXX6, an ATP dependent RNA helicase component of the RNA degradation pathway (Fig 7, S9 Table) having a role in piRNA biogenesis [106] was down-regulated in CLas-infected nymphs. Also, the presence of SID1 transcripts, which encode a putative transmembrane protein essential for systemic RNAi, indicates that ACP has such a systemic pathway [107], which has also been reported in certain aphids [108] and several other insects. In contrast there is evidence that dipterans such as Drosophila melanogaster or Anopheles gambiense utilize a cell-autonomous RNAi pathway [109, 110]. ACP contigs annotated as Dicer and Ago3, other well-known participants in the RNAi pathway [111], were not down-regulated in CLas-infected nymphs or adults. Interestingly, in Drosophila viral suppressors are known to target the host silencing machinery and suppress the RNAi silencing-mediated immune response [112]. However, in ACP, even though phage and other viral sequences are represented in the transcriptome, there was no evidence of CLas-associated effector stimulation of this suppression mechanism.
Certain viral proteins commonly stimulate stress responses that upregulate gene silencing pathways in the host. For example, a nemo-like transcript has been attributed to genotoxic responsiveness and regulation of innate immune responses against RNA viruses [113, 114]. Transcript profiles showed a nemo-like transcript down-regulated in CLas-infected nymphs (S5 Table) suggesting involvement of transposon or phage activation and is supported by the observed differential expression of genes annotated as virus-like in the ACP transcriptome.
Transposon-related contigs
The CLas genome encodes non-transport ABC proteins that are expected to regulate gene expression, repair DNA and RNA, and excise transposons [115]. In A. gambiae [116] and A. aegypti [117] transposable elements (TEs) remodel eukaryote genomes through rearrangements [118] and alter different functions in the host, some which are known to affect environmental adaptation [119]. TE insertions in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito have been associated with insecticide resistance [120]. Evidence for transposon reactivation-associated contigs in the ACP transcriptome may provide evidence for altered genome architecture associated with ‘environmental’ adaptation. If so, these and other epigenetic signatures could explain in part the evolution of different ACP haplotypes or strains [121, 122]. Given that TE invasion would be expected to result in concomitant disruption of genome integrity, expression level changes in the putatively TE-associated contigs was investigated (Fig 9). Indeed, a number of differentially expressed TE contigs were identified that could provide support for mobile element activity to be related to CLas-infection.
The expression of TE, Wolbachia and C. ruddii-like transcripts supports our contention that a complex host-parasite/pathogen-microbiome (bacterial and viral) community and its multi-partite, trans-kingdom interactions are essential for CLas systemic invasion of ACP that leads to circulative, propagative transmission. As such, there appears to be great potential for disrupting effectors encoded either by CLas and/or its associated microbial community, notwithstanding-virus-like effectors, and exploiting them as biopesticide targets to abate the ACP-mediated CLas transmission pathway.
Discussion
The on-line ACP annotated transcript database (http://www.sohomoptera.org/ACPPoP) has been established and interfaced with the easy-to-use Transcriptome Computational Workbench (TCW) tool, providing the first comprehensive computational resource for parsing differentially expressed genes of interest with high statistical significance.
The ACP transcript profiles were mined using TCW and KEGG pathway mapping to identify candidate psyllid proteins with predicted involvement in CLas-effector interactions, leading to invasion, multiplication, and circulation in the vector. Among the candidate transcripts were genes with predicted involvement in nutrition, and immune system and defense responses. Additionally, transcripts involved in gene silencing and TE activity were classified in biologically significant categories associated with CLas invasion and long-term host fitness that strongly implicate the activation of gene silencing pathways and TE accumulation [123]. Evidence of TE element activity is particularly intriguing owing to potential roles they may have in CLas pathogenesis, genome architecture evolution, and epigenetic inheritance.
The in silico comparative analyses of contigs in the CLas-infected and—uninfected nymph and adult stages showed many with predicted involvement in CLas invasion, adhesion, multiplication, biofilm formation, and nutritional parasitism. The results are striking in that they reveal differential responses by ACP life stages that are in line with CLas pathogenicity, namely, the (apparent) greater susceptibility of the ACP nymphal, over the adult, stages to CLas-infection. This proposed requisite for early-ACP stage CLas invasion, followed by an apparently, lowered virulence i.e. psyllid counter attack or CLas lessened pathogenicity might be explained by the need to minimize adult damage, which if excessive could impede adult dispersal, feeding, and reproduction, activities that promote ACP-mediated CLas transmission to the plant host. In this scenario, CLas manipulates the immature ACP host stages to ensure multiplication and attainment of a high titer to optimize circulation in the hemolymph and localization in the salivary glands. This is further supported by the observation that CLas does not interrupt essential developmental processes of the nymphal stages to the extent that growth, molting, or sexual maturation ultimately proceeds to completion. However, based on contigs assigned to a number of the major GO categories, certain processes appear to have been delayed temporarily. Even so, different expression profiling using both TCW annotations and KEGG pathway analyses suggest that CLas suppresses the immune system of both nymphal and adult stages. Taken together, ACP nymphs and adults both appear to provide distinct, essential contributions that offer key vantage points to CLas during psyllid host infection and systemic spread.
The in silico hypotheses presented here set the stage for new challenges to achieve next steps. Biologically relevant ACP proteins will require functional confirmation of protein-protein interactions with counterpart Liberibacter effector(s), and through direct knockdown using RNAi. From this study, a number of lucrative genes show promise as targets for abatement of psyllid-mediated CLas systemic invasion of ACP in the circulative, propagative transmission pathway leading to reduced transmission competency. Much additional information is still needed to elucidate the CLas transmission pathway, and to identify the most lucrative effectors that mediate the navigation of CLas through its (putative) secondary host. This will require a high level of understanding of the diverse array of proteins and other molecules that mediate pathogenesis/parasitism processes in this novel multi-partite, trans-kingdom community.
Finally, results demonstrate the presence of TE elements, and open the door for potentially harnessing them to drive gene expression in ACP using expression cassettes that can be engineered for psyllid transformation. Similarly, insertional mutagenesis and P-element insertions have been used in Drosophila to investigate gene function and genomic evolution. Transformation of psyllids with active TEs such as hobo, mariner, minos, or piggyback could aid in the transgenesis of psyllid lines having the potential for use in gene or gene-enhancer trapping, or possibly genome-wide insertional mutagenesis [124–127].
Powerful functional genomics and genetics approaches now promise unique opportunities for exploiting vulnerabilities in the CLas circulative-propagative pathway that could have direct bearing on CLas invasion and parasitism of ACP by interfering with key processes involved. Of particular interest for abatement of the infection-transmission cycles are ACP proteins required by CLas invasion-virulence, biofilm formation, and systemic circulation, and for salivary gland localization and acquisition targets. Those demonstrated to result in gene silencing mediated dsRNA, and delivered to the host plant for ingestion by psyllid, and/or through genetic modification of the psyllid itself, will offer new, versatile prospects for HLB management. Such novel biopesticide technologies have the potential to reduce or knock-out altogether CLas survival during gut invasion or multiplication, prevent its entry into and/or circulation in the hemolymph, or impede (putative) receptor-mediated entry into the salivary gland and/or vector acquisition itself. In short, achieving a CLas-diminished state within the ACP host has great potential to ‘replace’ the extant CLas-infected ACP populations with CLas-free psyllids, and thereby abate both horizontal and vertical transmission of the HLB pathogen between its primary and secondary hosts.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Citrus Research and Development Foundation (CRDF) and Florida Citrus Advanced Technology Program, Contracts 21 and 510, respectively for providing generous financial and professional support for this research. We also acknowledge the skills and generosity of Drs. Kirsten Pelz-Stelinski, CREC, Lake Alfred, FL, and Philip Stansly and Jawwad Qureshi, SWFREC, Immokalee, FL for providing the Asian citrus psyllids used in this research.
Data Availability
All data within the paper are available at the URL http://www.sohomoptera.org/ACPPoP and NCBI database (accession number(s) PRJNA243541, SRX525230, SRX525218, SRX525209, SRX525152K, and F907310-KF907319).
Funding Statement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Coordinated Agricultural Project (Award No. 2012-51181-20086), the Citrus Research and Development Foundation (CRDF) and Florida Citrus Advanced Technology Program, Contracts 21 and 510, respectively for providing generous financial and professional support for this research. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Bové JM (2006) Huanglongbing: A destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus. J Plant Pathol 88: 7–37. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gottwald TR, da Graça JV, Bassanezi RB (2007) Citrus Huanglongbing: The pathogen and its impact. Plant Health Progress 6. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Halbert SE, Niblett C, Manjunath K, Lee RF, Brown LG (2002) Establishment of two new vectors of citrus pathogens in Florida: 1016–1017. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jagoueix S, Bové JM, Garnier M (1994) The phloem-limited bacterium of greening disease of citrus is a member of the alpha subdivision of the Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44: 379–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gottwald T, Graham J, Irey M, McCollum T, Wood B (2012) Inconsequential effect of nutritional treatments on Huanglongbing control, fruit quality, bacterial titer and disease progress. Crop Protection 36: 73–82. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Grafton-Cardwell EE, Stelinski LL, Stansly PA (2013) Biology and management of Asian citrus psyllid, vector of the Huanglongbing pathogens. Annu Rev Entomol 58: 413–432. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hall DG, Richardson ML, Ammar E, Halbert SE (2013) Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, vector of citrus Huanglongbing disease. Entomol Exp Appl 146: 207–223. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ammar E, Shatters RG Jr, Lynch C, Hall DG (2011) Detection and relative titer of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in the salivary glands and alimentary canal of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) vector of citrus Huanglongbing disease. Ann Entomol Soc Am 104: 526–533. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ammar E, Shatters RG, Hall DG (2011) Localization of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, associated with citrus Huanglongbing disease, in its psyllid vector using fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Phytopathol 159: 726–734. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cicero J, Brown J (2014) SEM-and TEM-informed anatomical observations of Ca. Liberibacter solanacearum (Lso) parasite localization in its psyllid host. J Citrus Pathology 1(1). [Google Scholar]
- 11. Fisher T, Cicero J, Vyas M, He R, Nelson W, Willer M, et al. (2014) Translating anatomical structures and functional genomics of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus and solanacearum into circulative, propagative vector-mediated transmission processes. J Citrus Pathology 1(1). [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hilf ME, Sims KR, Folimonova SY, Achor DS (2013) Visualization of 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' cells in the vascular bundle of citrus seed coats with fluorescence in situ hybridization and transmission electron microscopy. Phytopathology 103: 545–554. 10.1094/PHYTO-09-12-0226-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Nwugo CC, Lin H, Duan Y, Civerolo EL (2013) The effect of 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' infection on the proteomic profiles and nutritional status of pre-symptomatic and symptomatic grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) plants. BMC Plant Biol 13: 59–2229– 13–59. 10.1186/1471-2229-13-59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Duan Y, Zhou L, Hall DG, Li W, Doddapaneni H, Lin H, et al. (2009) Complete genome sequence of citrus Huanglongbing bacterium, 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' obtained through metagenomics. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22: 1011–1020. 10.1094/MPMI-22-8-1011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hartung JS, Shao J, Kuykendall LD (2011) Comparison of the 'Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus' genome adapted for an intracellular lifestyle with other members of the rhizobiales. PLoS One 6: e23289 10.1371/journal.pone.0023289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Biere A, Bennett AE (2013) Three‐way interactions between plants, microbes and insects. Funct Ecol 27: 567–573. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pelz-Stelinski KS, Brlansky RH, Ebert TA, Rogers ME (2010) Transmission parameters for Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by Asian citrus psyllid (hemiptera: Psyllidae). J Econ Entomol 103: 1531–1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Inoue H, Ohnishi J, Ito T, Tomimura K, Miyata S, Iwanami T, et al. (2009) Enhanced proliferation and efficient transmission of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by adult Diaphorina citri after acquisition feeding in the nymphal stage. Ann Appl Biol 155: 29–36 [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mann RS, Pelz-Stelinski K, Hermann SL, Tiwari S, Stelinski LL (2011) Sexual transmission of a plant pathogenic bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, between conspecific insect vectors during mating. PLoS One 6: e29197 10.1371/journal.pone.0029197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Martini X, Addison T, Fleming B, Jackson I, Pelz-Stelinski K, Stelinski LL, et al. (2013) Occurrence of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) in an unexpected ecosystem: The lake kissimmee state park forest, Florida. Fla Entomol 96: 658–660. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hurd H (2003) Manipulation of medically important insect vectors by their parasites. Annu Rev Entomol 48: 141–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cambronne ED, Roy CR (2006) Recognition and delivery of effector proteins into eukaryotic cells by bacterial secretion systems. Traffic 7: 929–939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Shames SR, Finlay BB (2012) Bacterial effector interplay: A new way to view effector function. Trends Microbiol 20: 214–219. 10.1016/j.tim.2012.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Dean P (2011) Functional domains and motifs of bacterial type III effector proteins and their roles in infection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35: 1100–1125. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00271.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Hogenhout SA, Ammar E, Whitfield AE, Redinbaugh MG (2008) Insect vector interactions with persistently transmitted viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 46: 327–359. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.022508.092135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wang S, Jacobs-Lorena M (2013) Genetic approaches to interfere with malaria transmission by vector mosquitoes. Trends Biotechnol 31: 185–193. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bian G, Xu Y, Lu P, Xie Y, Xi Z (2010) The endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia induces resistance to dengue virus in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathogens 6: e1000833 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hussain M, Frentiu FD, Moreira LA, O'Neill SL, Asgari S (2011) Wolbachia uses host microRNAs to manipulate host gene expression and facilitate colonization of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 9250–9255. 10.1073/pnas.1105469108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. El-Shesheny I, Hajeri S, El-Hawary I, Gowda S, Killiny N (2013) Silencing abnormal wing disc gene of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri disrupts adult wing development and increases nymph mortality. PLoS One 8: e65392 10.1371/journal.pone.0065392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Wuriyanghan H, Rosa C, Falk BW (2011) Oral delivery of double-stranded RNAs and siRNAs induces RNAi effects in the potato/tomato psyllid, Bactericerca cockerelli. PLoS One 6: e27736 10.1371/journal.pone.0027736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wang N, Trivedi P (2013) Citrus Huanglongbing: A newly relevant disease presents unprecedented challenges. Phytopathology 103: 652–665. 10.1094/PHYTO-12-12-0331-RVW [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zou H, Gowda S, Zhou L, Hajeri S, Chen G, Duan Y, et al. (2012) The destructive citrus pathogen, ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ encodes a functional flagellin characteristic of a pathogen-associated molecular pattern. PLoS One 7: e46447 10.1371/journal.pone.0046447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Fisher TW, Vyas M, Nelson W, Cicero JM, Willer M, Kim R, et al. (2014) Comparison of potato and Asian citrus psyllid adult and nymph transcriptomes identified vector transcripts with potential involvement in the circulative, propagative Liberibacter transmission pathway. Pathogens 3(4): 875–907. 10.3390/pathogens3040875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hunter W, Dowd S, Katsar C, Shatters R, McKenzie C, McKenzie CL, et al. (2009) Psyllid biology: Expressed genes in adult Asian citrus psyllids, Diaphorina citri kuwayama. Open entomology journal 3: 18–29. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Reese J, Christenson MK, Leng N, Saha S, Cantarel B, Lindeberg M, et al. (2014) Characterization of the Asian citrus psyllid transcriptome. J Genomics 2: 54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. He R, Kim MJ, Nelson W, Balbuena TS, Kim R, Kramer K, et al. (2012) Next-generation sequencing-based transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of the common reed, Phragmites australis (Poaceae), reveals genes involved in invasiveness and rhizome specificity. Am J Bot 99: 232–247. 10.3732/ajb.1100429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Birol I, Jackman SD, Nielsen CB, Qian JQ, Varhol R, Stazyk G, et al. (2009) De novo transcriptome assembly with ABySS. Bioinformatics 25: 2872–2877. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam T, Yiu S, Kristiansen K, et al. (2009) SOAP2: An improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 25: 1966–1967. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Chevreux B, Pfisterer T, Drescher B, Driesel AJ, Muller WEG, Wetter T, et al. (2004) Using the miraEST assembler for reliable and automated mRNA transcript assembly and SNP detection in sequenced ESTs. Genome Res 14: 1147–1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Li W, Godzik A (2006) Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22: 1658–1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754–1760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Soderlund C, Nelson W, Willer M, Gang DR (2013) TCW: Transcriptome computational workbench. PLoS One 8: e69401 10.1371/journal.pone.0069401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. (2000) Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25: 25–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: A bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139–140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Young M, Wakefield M, Smyth G, Oshlack A (2010) Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: Accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol 11: R14 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kanehisa M, Goto S (2000) KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nuc. Acids Res 28(1): 27–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Dallas PB, Gottardo NG, Firth MJ, Beesley AH, Hoffmann K, Terry PA, et al. (2005) Gene expression levels assessed by oligonucleotide microarray analysis and quantitative real-time RT-PCR—how well do they correlate? BMC Genomics 6: 59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A, Bennetzen JL, Capy P, Chalhoub B, et al. (2007) A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat Rev Genet 8: 973–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Thao ML, Clark MA, Burckhardt DH, Moran NA, Baumann P (2001) Phylogenetic analysis of vertically transmitted psyllid endosymbionts (Candidatus carsonella ruddii) based on atpAGD and rpoC: Comparisons with 16S–23S rDNA-derived phylogeny. Curr Microbiol 42: 419–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Saha S, Hunter WB, Reese J, Morgan JK, Marutani-Hert M, Huang H, et al. (2012) Survey of endosymbionts in the Diaphorina citri metagenome and assembly of a Wolbachia wDi draft genome. PLoS One 7: e50067 10.1371/journal.pone.0050067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Bonazzi M, Cossart P (2006) Bacterial entry into cells: a role for the endocytic machinery. FEBS letters 580(12): 2962–2967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ungewickell EJ, Hinrichsen L (2007) Endocytosis: clathrin-mediated membrane budding. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19(4): 417–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Veiga E, Guttman JA, Bonazzi M, Boucrot E, Toledo-Arana A, Lin AE, et al. (2007) Invasive and adherent bacterial pathogens co-Opt host clathrin for infection. Cell host microbe 2(5): 340–351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Werr M, Cramer J, Ilg T (2009) Identification and characterization of two arginine kinases from the parasitic insect Ctenocephalides felis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 39: 634–645. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Brubaker-Purkey BJ, Woodruff RI (2013) Vitellogenesis in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster: Antagonists demonstrate that the PLC, IP3/DAG, PK-C pathway is triggered by calmodulin. J Insect Sci 13: 68 10.1673/031.013.6801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. He H, Hou L, Wang J, Zhao X (2012) The apoptosis inhibitor survivin prevents insect midgut from cell death during postembryonic development. Mol Biol Rep 39: 1691–1699. 10.1007/s11033-011-0909-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ingham PW, McMahon AP (2001) Hedgehog signaling in animal development: Paradigms and principles. Genes Dev 15: 3059–3087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Logan CY, Nusse R (2004) The wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20: 781–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Charles J (2010) The regulation of expression of insect cuticle protein genes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40: 205–213. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Meng Y, Omuro N, Funaguma S, Daimon T, Kawaoka S, Katsuma S, et al. (2008) Prominent down‐regulation of storage protein genes after bacterial challenge in eri‐silkworm, Samia cynthia ricini. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 67: 9–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Rosenfield C, You KM, Marsella-Herrick P, Roelofs WL, Knipple DC (2001) Structural and functional conservation and divergence among acyl-CoA desaturases of two noctuid species, the corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea, and the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 31: 949–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Wolfstetter G, Holz A (2012) The role of LamininB2 (LanB2) during mesoderm differentiation in Drosophila. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 69: 267–282. 10.1007/s00018-011-0652-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Critchley D (2004) Cytoskeletal proteins talin and vinculin in integrin-mediated adhesion. Biochem Soc Trans 32: 831–836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Fillingham I, Gingras AR, Papagrigoriou E, Patel B, Emsley J, Chritchley DR, et al. (2005) A vinculin binding domain from the talin rod unfolds to form a complex with the vinculin head. Structure 13: 65–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Izard T, Tran Van Nhieu G, Bois PR (2006) Shigella applies molecular mimicry to subvert vinculin and invade host cells. J Cell Biol 175: 465–475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Park H, Lee JH, Gouin E, Cossart P, Izard T (2011) The rickettsia surface cell antigen 4 applies mimicry to bind to and activate vinculin. J Biol Chem 286: 35096–35103. 10.1074/jbc.M111.263855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Chuong CM, Chen HM (1991) Enhanced expression of neural cell adhesion molecules and tenascin (cytotactin) during wound healing. Am J Pathol 138: 427–440. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Kumanogoh A, Kikutani H (2003) Roles of the semaphorin family in immune regulation. Adv Immunol 81: 173–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Kutsukake M, Shibao H, Nikoh N, Morioka M, Tamura T, Hoshino T, et al. (2004) Venomous protease of aphid soldier for colony defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 11338–11343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Jones P, George A (2004) The ABC transporter structure and mechanism: Perspectives on recent research. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS 61: 682–699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Gahan LJ, Pauchet Y, Vogel H, Heckel DG (2010) An ABC transporter mutation is correlated with insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin. PLoS Genetics 6: e1001248 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Chambers MC, Song KH, Schneider DS (2012) Listeria monocytogenes infection causes metabolic shifts in Drosophila melanogaster. PloS one 7(12): e50679 10.1371/journal.pone.0050679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Chaudhuri S, Gantner BN, Richard DY, Cianciotto NP, Freitag NE (2013) The Listeria monocytogenes ChiA chitinase enhances virulence through suppression of host innate immunity. mBio 4(2): e00617–12. 10.1128/mBio.00617-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Killiny N, Prado SS, Almeida RP (2010) Chitin utilization by the insect-transmitted bacterium Xylella fastidiosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 6134–6140. 10.1128/AEM.01036-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Weers PM, Ryan RO (2006) Apolipophorin III: Role model apolipoprotein. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 36: 231–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Hanada Y, Sekimizu K, Kaito C (2011) Silkworm apolipophorin protein inhibits Staphylococcus aureus virulence. J Biol Chem 286: 39360–39369. 10.1074/jbc.M111.278416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Huebers H, Huebers E, Finch C, Webb B, Truman J, Riddiford LM, et al. (1988) Iron binding proteins and their roles in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta (L.). J Comp Physiol B 158: 291–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Sandrini S, Masania R, Zia F, Haigh R, Freestone P (2013) Role of porin proteins in acquisition of transferrin iron by enteropathogens. Microbiology 159: 2639–2650. 10.1099/mic.0.071928-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Magalhaes T, Oliveira IF, Melo-Santos MA, Oliveira CM, Lima CA, Ayres CF, et al. (2008) Expression of defensin, cecropin, and transferrin in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) infected with Wuchereria bancrofti (Spirurida: Onchocercidae), and the abnormal development of nematodes in the mosquito. Exp Parasitol 120: 364–371. 10.1016/j.exppara.2008.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Pham DQ, Winzerling JJ (2010) Insect ferritins: Typical or atypical? Biochim Biophys Acta-General Subjects 1800: 824–833. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Kramerova IA, Kawaguchi N, Fessler LI, Nelson RE, Chen Y, Kramerova AA, et al. (2000) Papilin in development; a pericellular protein with a homology to the ADAMTS metalloproteinases. Development 127: 5475–5485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Bogaert T, Brown N, Wilcox M (1987) The Drosophila PS2 antigen is an invertebrate integrin that, like the fibronectin receptor, becomes localized to muscle attachments. Cell 51: 929–940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Lecuit T (2005) Cell adhesion: Sorting out cell mixing with echinoid? Curr Biol 15: R505–R507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Hubmacher D, Tiedemann K, Reinhardt DP (2006) Fibrillins: From biogenesis of microfibrils to signaling functions. Curr Top Dev Biol 75: 93–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Eleftherianos I, Revenis C (2011) Role and importance of phenoloxidase in insect hemostasis. J Innate Immun 3: 28–33. 10.1159/000321931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Kotani E, Yamakawa M, Iwamoto S, Tashiro M, Mori H, Sumida M, et al. (1995) Cloning and expression of the gene of hemocytin, an insect humoral lectin which is homologous with the mammalian von willebrand factor Biochim Biophys Acta-Gene Structure and Expression 1260: 245–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Bishop A, Hall A (2000) Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. Biochem J 348: 241–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Colinet D, Schmitz A, Depoix D, Crochard D, Poirié M (2007) Convergent use of RhoGAP toxins by eukaryotic parasites and bacterial pathogens. PLoS pathogens 3: e203 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Kim GS, Kim Y (2010) Up-regulation of circulating hemocyte population in response to bacterial challenge is mediated by octopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine via Rac1 signal in Spodoptera exigua. J Insect Physiol 56: 559–566. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.11.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Williams MJ, Wiklund ML, Wikman S, Hultmark D (2006) Rac1 signalling in the Drosophila larval cellular immune response. J Cell Sci 119: 2015–2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Huang C, Jacobson K, Schaller MD (2004) MAP kinases and cell migration. J Cell Sci 117: 4619–4628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Gerardo NM, Altincicek B, Anselme C, Atamian H, Barribeau SM, De Vos M, et al. (2010) Immunity and other defenses in pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Genome Biol 11: R21 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Laughton AM, Garcia JR, Altincicek B, Strand MR, Gerardo NM (2011) Characterization of immune responses in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. J Insect Physiol 57: 830–839. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Burke G, Moran N (2011) Responses of the pea aphid transcriptome to infection by facultative symbionts. Insect Mol Biol 20: 357–365. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2011.01070.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Chan QW, Melathopoulos AP, Pernal SF, Foster LJ (2009) The innate immune and systemic response in honey bees to a bacterial pathogen, Paenibacillus larvae. BMC Genomics 10: 387–2164– 10–387. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Burmester T (1999) Evolution and function of the insect hexamerins. Eur J Entomol 96: 213–22 6. [Google Scholar]
- 97. Seehuus SC, Norberg K, Gimsa U, Krekling T, Amdam GV (2006) Reproductive protein protects functionally sterile honey bee workers from oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 962–967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Nachappa P, Shapiro AA, Tamborindeguy C (2012) Effect of'Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum'on fitness of its insect vector, Bactericera cockerelli (hemiptera: Triozidae), on tomato. Phytopathology 102: 41–46. 10.1094/PHYTO-03-11-0084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Rossignol PA, Ribeiro JM, Spielman A (1986) Increased biting rate and reduced fertility in sporozoite-infected mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 35: 277–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Warr E, Meredith J, Nimmo D, Basu S, Hurd H, Eggleston P, et al. (2006) A tapeworm molecule manipulates vitellogenin expression in the beetle Tenebrio molitor. Insect Mol Biol 15: 497–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Jiang H, Yang C, Qu H, Liu Z, Fu QS, Qiao C, et al. (2007) Cloning of a novel aldo-keto reductase gene from Klebsiella sp. strain F51-1-2 and its functional expression in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 4959–4965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Dong C, Wei Z, Yang G (2011) Involvement of peroxinectin in the defence of red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkia against pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol 30: 1223–1229. 10.1016/j.fsi.2011.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Lemaitre B, Hoffmann J (2007) The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Immunol 25: 697–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Donald CL, Kohl A, Schnettler E (2012) New insights into control of arbovirus replication and spread by insect RNA interference pathways. Insects 3: 511–531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Orban TI, Izaurralde E (2005) Decay of mRNAs targeted by RISC requires XRN1, the Ski complex, and the exosome. RNA 11(4): 459–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Siomi MC, Sato K, Pezic D, Aravin AA (2011) PIWI-interacting small RNAs: The vanguard of genome defence. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 246–258. 10.1038/nrm3089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Winston WM, Molodowitch C, Hunter CP (2002) Systemic RNAi in C. elegans requires the putative transmembrane protein SID-1. Science 295: 2456–2459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Xu W, Han Z (2008) Cloning and phylogenetic analysis of sid-1-like genes from aphids. J Insect Sci 8: 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Roignant JY, Carre C, Mugat B, Szymczak D, Lepesant JA, Antoniewski C, et al. (2003) Absence of transitive and systemic pathways allows cell-specific and isoform-specific RNAi in Drosophila. RNA 9: 299–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Voinnet O (2005) Non-cell autonomous RNA silencing. FEBS Lett 579: 5858–5871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Govind S (2008) Innate immunity in Drosophila: Pathogens and pathways. Insect Sci 15: 29–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. van Rij RP, Saleh MC, Berry B, Foo C, Houk A, Antoniewski C, et al. (2006) The RNA silencing endonuclease argonaute 2 mediates specific antiviral immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev 20: 2985–2995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Wang Y, Ran Y, Shu H (2012) Linear ubiquitination of NEMO brakes the antiviral response. Cell host & microbe 12: 129–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Wu Z, Wong ET, Shi Y, Niu J, Chen Z, Miyamoto S, et al. (2010) ATM-and NEMO-dependent ELKS ubiquitination coordinates TAK1-mediated IKK activation in response to genotoxic stress. Mol Cell 40: 75–86. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Li W, Cong Q, Pei J, Kinch LN, Grishin NV (2012) The ABC transporters in Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 80: 2614–2628. 10.1002/prot.24147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Holt RA, Subramanian GM, Halpern A, Sutton GG, Charlab R, Nusskern DR, et al. (2002) The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science 298: 129–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Nene V, Wortman JR, Lawson D, Haas B, Kodira C, Tu ZJ, et al. (2007) Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector. Science 316: 1718–1723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Gray YH (2000) It takes two transposons to tango: Transposable-element-mediated chromosomal rearrangements. Trends Genet 16: 461–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. González J, Karasov TL, Messer PW, Petrov DA (2010) Genome-wide patterns of adaptation to temperate environments associated with transposable elements in Drosophila. PLoS genetics 6: e1000905 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Itokawa K, Komagata O, Kasai S, Okamura Y, Masada M, Tomita T, et al. (2010) Genomic structures of Cyp9m10 in pyrethroid resistant and susceptible strains of Culex quinquefasciatus. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40: 631–640. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Thornburg BG, Gotea V, Makałowski W (2006) Transposable elements as a significant source of transcription regulating signals. Gene 365: 104–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Mukherjee K, Fischer R, Vilcinskas A (2012) Histone acetylation mediates epigenetic regulation of transcriptional reprogramming in insects during metamorphosis, wounding and infection. Front Zool 9: 25–9994– 9–25. 10.1186/1742-9994-9-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Pasyukova EG, Nuzhdin SV, Morozova TV, Mackay TF (2004) Accumulation of transposable elements in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster is associated with a decrease in fitness. J Hered 95: 284–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Bonin CP, Mann RS (2004) A piggyBac transposon gene trap for the analysis of gene expression and function in Drosophila. Genetics 167: 1801–1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Horn C, Offen N, Nystedt S, Hacker U, Wimmer EA (2003) piggyBac-based insertional mutagenesis and enhancer detection as a tool for functional insect genomics. Genetics 163: 647–661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Klinakis AG, Zagoraiou L, Vassilatis DK, Savakis C (2000) Genome‐wide insertional mutagenesis in human cells by the Drosophila mobile element minos. EMBO Rep 1: 416–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Spradling AC, Stern D, Beaton A, Rhem EJ, Laverty T, Mozden N, et al. (1999) The Berkeley Drosophila genome project gene disruption project: Single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes. Genetics 153: 135–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data within the paper are available at the URL http://www.sohomoptera.org/ACPPoP and NCBI database (accession number(s) PRJNA243541, SRX525230, SRX525218, SRX525209, SRX525152K, and F907310-KF907319).