Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gerontology. 2014 Dec 20;61(4):336–342. doi: 10.1159/000368897

Mucosal Immunosenescence In The Gastrointestinal Tract

Shintaro Sato a,b,c, Hiroshi Kiyono a,b,c,d, Kohtaro Fujihashi d
PMCID: PMC4475504  NIHMSID: NIHMS641158  PMID: 25531743

Abstract

It has been shown that pathogen-specific secretory IgA (SIgA) antibody (Ab) is the major player at mucosal surfaces for host defense. However, alterations in the mucosal immune system occur in advanced aging which results in a failure of induction of SIgA Abs for protection from infectious diseases. Signs of mucosal senescence first appear in the gut immune system. Further, changes in the intestinal microbiota most likely influence mucosal immunity. To overcome the immunological aging decline in mucosal immunity, several adjuvant systems including mucosal dendritic cell (DC) targeting have been shown to be attractive and effective immunological strategies. Similarly, antigen (Ag) uptake-M cells are ideal targets for facilitating Ag-specific mucosal immune responses. However, the numbers of M cells are reduced in aged mice. In this regard, Spi-B, an essential transcription factor for the functional and structural differentiation of M cells could be a potent strategy for the induction of effective mucosal immunity in aging.

Keywords: Mucosa, Aging, Dendritic cells, M cells, Secretory IgA

The Mucosal Immune System

The mucosal immune system in higher mammals is sophisticated and consists of an integrated network of tissues, lymphoid and mucous membrane-associated cells and effector antibody (Ab) molecules. Along with cytokines, chemokines and their receptors, these effector Ab molecules, which are primarily of the IgA isotype, are key players in mucosal immunity and appear to function in synergy with innate host factors [1,2]. Thus, in order to induce antigen (Ag)-specific immune responses at these mucosal barriers, one must consider the common mucosal immune system (CMIS), which supports the concept of distinct mucosal IgA inductive and effector tissues [1,2]. The mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues (MALT) serve as the major mucosal inductive sites. MALT is covered by a lymphoepithelium containing microfold (M) cells and well organized regions, the subepithelium with enriched Ag-presenting cells (APCs), a B cell zone with germinal centers (GCs), and adjacent T cell areas including an equal distribution of naïve and memory T cell phenotypes [1,2]. Upon Ag-activation, memory B and T cell populations then emigrate from the mucosal inductive environment via lymphatic drainage, circulate through the bloodstream, and home to mucosal effector sites where abundant IgA producing plasma cells are present. Effector sites for mucosal immune responses include the lymphoid cells in the lamina propria (LP) of the gastrointestinal (GI), upper respiratory (UR), and reproductive tracts as well as secretory glandular tissues [1,2]. Ag-specific mucosal effector cells include IgA-producing plasma cells as well as mature B and T lymphocytes. Secretory IgA (SIgA) is the primary Ig involved in protecting mucosal surfaces and is locally produced by plasma cells in mucosal effector tissues [1,2]. In this regard, the majority of T and B cells in effector tissues are activated and express a memory phenotype [1,2]. Thus, it is generally agreed that mucosal immune responses are initiated in mucosal inductive (e.g., GALT and NALT) but not effector tissues.

Despite recent achievements in an understanding of the complexities within the mucosal immune system, only limited information is available in terms of age-associated changes that occur in mucosal immune responses. In this short review, we will mainly focus on gastrointestinal (GI) immune responses in aging in order to shed light on the unique cellular and molecular changes which occur in mucosal immunosenescence.

Mucosal Immunosenescence

Immune functions are known to deteriorate with age in several species. In humans, the elderly are at a higher risk for infections, especially severe infections, as well as for certain autoimmune diseases and cancer, and their immune responses to vaccination are diminished [3]. It has been accepted that aged humans exhibit loss of naïve T cells and exhibit a more restricted T cell repertoire [4]. Further, aging results in decreased human CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses, restricted B cell clonal diversity, failure to produce high affinity Abs, and an increase in memory T (TM) cells [5-7]. It has been suggested that although certain DC populations are fully functional in aging [8-11], both foreign and self-Ags induce enhanced proinflammatory cytokines [12,13]. This enhancement of inflammation can be detrimental; however, very old individuals with a more balanced pro- and anti- inflammatory phenotype may be the most fortunate [14,15]. The association of inflammation in aging has been termed “inflamm aging” [16]; however, we still do not have direct evidence that inflamm aging occurs in and therefore influences the mucosal immune system.

Studies have provided extensive evidence of dysregulation and of an overall decline in mucosal immunity especially in the GI tract of the elderly [3]. The most common method for evaluating mucosal immune responses is perhaps to test external secretions for the presence of SIgA antibodies (Abs). In humans, GI lavages taken from either aged or young subjects were shown to contain similar total Ig levels [17]. Our group has shown that early development of aging occurs in the GI tract immune system [18]. Thus, fecal extract samples from one-year old mice contained low levels of Ag-specific SIgA Abs; however, total IgA levels were essentially the same as those seen in young adult mice [19]. Similar results have also been reported for total IgA levels in serum of aged mice, rats and humans [18]. These studies indicate an absence of aged-associated impairment in total IgA synthesis in external secretions. However, Ag-specific IgA Ab responses in elderly humans, mice and rats are markedly lower than those seen in the young. Further, our previous studies showed that the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) inductive immune system is affected by immunosenescence earlier than are the nasopharyngeal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) -based and systemic immune systems [19,20]. In addition, it has been suggested that maturation into adulthood, from 8 to 24 weeks of age, significantly influenced the induction of oral tolerance in various strains of mice [21]. However, oral tolerance established at an early age could be maintained even during the aging process, while the induction of oral tolerance to new or virgin Ags was impaired in aged mice. These results clearly show that Ag-specific mucosal SIgA Ab responses and oral tolerance are diminished in aged mice, especially those supported by the GALT immune system.

The Potential Role Of The Intestinal Microbiota In Mucosal Immunosenescence

The mammalian large intestine contains up to 1012 bacteria per gram of intestinal contents [22,23]. Indeed, the human gut microbiota harbors more than 50 genera/ several hundred species which represent more genes in the gut microflora than is seen in the human genome [24]. The normal microbiota is essential to maintain appropriate homeostatic conditions, providing energy in the form of short-chain fatty acids, nutrients and protection against colonization with potential pathogenic bacteria by production of anti-microbial peptides [23,25]. In addition to these functions, the intestinal microbiota plays a major role in maturation of the host immune system including intestinal SIgA Ab production and intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) development [22,26]. For example, germ free (GF) mice have an immature GI mucosal immune system which includes hypoplastic Peyer's patches (PPs), diminished numbers of IgA-producing cells and CD4+ T cells [22,27]. GF mice exposed to normal mice or mono-associated with E. coli resulted in maturation of the mucosal immune system [28,29]. Further, it was reported that bacterial stimulation of human intestinal epithelial cells supported IgA2 subclass switching [30]. Conversely, lack of intestinal IgA Ab responses altered the intestinal microbiota by allowing bacterial population changes to occur. Thus, aberrant expansion of segmented filamentous bacteria was noted in activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-deficient mice which lack an appropriate molecular environment for IgA class switching [31]. Further, opportunistic bacteria, largely Alcaligenes species, specifically inhabit GALT or PPs, and isolated lymphoid follicles (ILFs), with the associated preferential induction of Ag-specific SIgA Abs in the GI tract [32]. The absence of a microflora in the GI tract also affects oral tolerance induction [33]. Thus, one cannot readily induce oral tolerance in GF mice [34]. Indeed, human microbiome analyses have revealed significant changes in the intestinal microflora in the elderly (< 65) [35,36]. However, others showed that the change in microbiota was seen only in the centenarians associated with increased inflammatory cytokine responses, but not in the elderly (average age 70 ± 3) [37]. Nevertheless, these findings would indirectly suggest that the alterations in the intestinal microflora and the decline in the gut immune system are major changes associated with aging.

Induction of Mucosal Immune Responses in Aging

The elderly are in general much more susceptible to infections usually acquired via mucosal exposures. The GI tract in the elderly is particularly susceptible to infectious diseases, suggesting that poor mucosal immunity is a major factor leading to higher mortality to infections in aging [38,39]. Further, Ag-specific mucosal IgA Ab responses are diminished in aged animals especially those seen in the GI tract associated immune system [3,18]. Moreover, the severity and mortality caused by influenza virus and the bacterial pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus) are sharply increased in humans of advanced age [40,41]. Although it has been shown that effective protection can be provided by pathogen-specific systemic IgG without mucosal IgA responses [42], pathogen-specific SIgA Ab responses are a necessary component for providing a first line of effective immunity against these respiratory pathogens at their entry site [8,43]. However, it has proven difficult to induce de novo vaccine-specific mucosal immunity in the elderly using current vaccine approaches. Indeed, it has been shown that the tri- and tetravalent live attenuated influenza virus nasal vaccines are ineffective in the elderly (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6332a3.htm and https://www.flumistquadrivalent.com/consumer/index.html). This could be due to pre-existing influenza-specific Abs including respiratory SIgA in older individuals which may influence the uptake of the nasal influenza vaccine.

The induction of mucosal immune responses requires either the use of mucosal adjuvants and/or of live, attenuated microbe delivery system [1,2]. Co-administration of adjuvant(s) offer the advantage of also eliciting Ag-specific parenteral immune responses [1,2]. In this regard, adjuvant systems have provided significant improvement in the development of influenza vaccines in the elderly [44,45]. Thus, an H5N1 vaccine with MF59 adjuvant induced a rapid rise in broadly cross-reactive Abs as well as long-lived human memory B cells [44]. More recently, the AS03 adjuvant system (Squalene, DL-α-tocopherol and polysorbate 80, GlaxoSmithKline) improved the immune response to inactivated 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine in both healthy adults (18–64 years) and older adults (> 65 years) [45]. Despite this advance, a recent study showed that nasal vaccination of mice with detergent split-influenza Ag [A/Uruguay716/2007 (H3N2)] given with purified monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) in liposomes promoted detrimental Th17-mediated immunity [46]. The vaccine induced both mucosal and plasma-derived Abs: however, the mice lost weight but eventually recovered [46]. These findings illustrate the point that adjuvant selection and the delivery method must be carefully considered in order to develop effective and safe vaccines. Since it has been shown that resident memory T cells play key roles in the protection from influenza virus infection [47], re-activation of these T cell populations may represent an additional approach to induce Ag-specific immunity.

DC-Targeting Mucosal Immunization for Restoring Aging

To explore new avenues for effective mucosal immunization strategies, investigators have begun to target mucosal tissues and immune cells for vaccine delivery. To this end, mucosal DC-targeting Ag delivery systems have been shown to induce Ag-specific SIgA responses [48-50]. CpG ODN as vaccine adjuvant has been shown to restore Ag-specific immune responses to ovalbumin (OVA), diphtheria toxoid, hepatitis B, pneumococcal polysaccharides, amyloid β and tumor cells in aged mice and rats [3]. In addition, it has been shown that IL-15 treatment also restored impaired DC functions in mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) of aged mice [51]. When mucosally normal 3 month-old versus mucosally challenged 18 month-old mice were orally immunized with the weak immunogen OVA plus CpG ODN as adjuvant, both groups of mice showed high and equivalent levels of OVA-specific systemic IgG and mucosal SIgA Ab responses [52]. Furthermore, our studies showed that when a combined nasal adjuvant consisting of a plasmid encoding the Flt3 ligand cDNA (pFL) and CpG ODN were given with OVA, or with PspA or HA to aged mice, significant levels of Ag-specific, SIgA Ab responses were induced in external secretions with full protection from pneumococcal or influenza virus infection [8,9,48] Importantly, this double adjuvant system elicited balanced Th1- and Th2-type cytokine responses without increasing potential inflammatory IL-17 responses [8,9,48].

Potential for an M Cell Targeting Strategy in Aging

As emphasized thus far, MALT (NALT and GALT) has an important role in mucosal immunity. In this regard, an Ag-sampling system that takes up luminal antigens into the tissue from the mucosal environment is mediated by M cells. M cells have unique morphological features, such as relatively short-irregular microvilli on their apical surfaces and a pocket structure that enfolds lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells including DCs (Fig. 1A). These unique features allow M cells to transport luminal Ags from the gut or nasal lumen to underlying MALT lymphocytes more efficiently. Thus, a strategy for targeting these M cells for the induction of mucosal immunity in aging is highly attractive. Reoviruses use their own protein sigma one (pσ1) to initiate infection through the M cells [53,54]. In this regard, M cell-targeting DNA vaccine complexes consisting of plasmid DNA and the covalently attached reovirus pσ1 to poly-L-lysine (PL) induced significant mucosal SIgA Ab responses in addition to systemic immunity [54]. Further, a novel M cell-specific monoclonal antibody (NKM 16-2-4) has been used as a carrier for M cell targeting with a mucosal vaccine to elicit protective immunity against lethal challenge with botulinum neurotoxin [55]. Oral immunization of Ag fused with M cell-targeting peptide ligand (Co1) resulted in enhanced Ag-specific immune responses [56]. Although there is little information about the molecular mechanisms for Ag sampling in M cells due to difficulty in their in vitro culture, it has been reported that glycoprotein 2 (GP2) is specifically expressed on M cells, and acts as a binding receptor for FimH-expressing bacteria (e.g., E. coli and Salmonella spp.) to induce effective uptake of and specific immune responses to such bacteria [57,58]. Interestingly, it has also been reported that Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) type III effector protein SopB induces a transition of follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) enterocytes into M cells [59].

Figure 1. Unique features of M cells and their differentiation.

Figure 1

(A) M cells exhibit short and sparse villi when compared with other surrounding FAE cells. Dogma suggests that this feature contributes to easy access to the M cells by numerous external materials including commensal bacteria. In addition, the shape of M cells looks like ‘arms’, which are able to ‘hold’ lymphocytes and Ag presenting cells. (B) As with other intestinal epithelial cells, M cells develop from intestinal epithelial stem cells (IESC). Enterocytes located in the FAE possibly receive RANKL stimulation from sub-epithelial stromal cells of Peyer's patches via RANK, which is expressed on most intestinal epithelial cells. This stimulation triggers the induction of Spi-B, which is an essential transcription factor for mature M cells. The target genes of Spi-B contribute to the final development and functional expression of M cells. For example, GP2, which is one of the Spi-B targets in M cells, acts as a scaffold receptor for FimH protein possessed by E. coli and Salmonella spp.

Recently, it has been reported that one of the E26 avian leukemia oncogene transformation-specific (Ets) family transcription factors, Spi-B is essential for the functional and structural differentiation of M cells [60-62]. The same as all other intestinal epithelial cell lineages, M cells develop from leucine rich repeat containing G protein coupled receptor 5-positive (Lgr5+) intestinal epithelial stem cells [62]. Some M-cell precursor cells receive receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) stimulation from the subepithelial stromal cells in the FAE region. This signal triggers the expression and activation of Spi-B, and subsequently upregulation of several Spi-B-target genes including glycoprotein 2 (GP2), which is considered to be a matured M-cell marker (Fig. 1B). Of importance, it has been shown that GP2+, mature GALT M cells are significantly decreased in aged mice [63]. Although the expression of RANKL and RANK and their signaling are not altered in aged mice, Spi-B-positive cells are significantly diminished in the FAE region of aged mice through an unknown mechanism [63]. In agreement with the reduction in mature M cells, the uptake of latex particles into the PPs is severely impaired in aged mice. Furthermore, in the absence of M cell-intrinsic Spi-B, activation of T cells toward orally inoculated S. Typhimurium is severely diminished [61]. Therefore, reduced M-cell numbers may be one of the causes of immunosenescence in the elderly. Although M cells are also found in the NALT FAE, there is no report describing a change in the density of mature M cells in NALT FAE with aging so far. Therefore, it is possible that one of the reasons for the delay in immunosenescence in NALT is the maintenance of high numbers of mature functional M cells on NALT FAE of aged mice. From the view of vaccine development, forced Spi-B activation and/or expression may be a good target for an oral vaccine adjuvant used in the elderly.

In conclusion, there is significant evidence showing that the GI tract immune system is altered by advanced aging; however, the precise cellular and molecular mechanisms which lead to mucosal immunosenescence remain to be elucidated, especially in humans. A clear understanding of the mucosal immune system in aging could lead to development of new strategies for vaccines specifically tailored for the elderly.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants AG025873 (to K. F.) as well as the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) [25860353 to S.S.]); research funding for Longevity Sciences (26-22) of the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan (to S. S.); and the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (to H. K.).

References

  • 1.Fujihashi K, Boyaka PN, McGhee JR. Host defenses at mucosal surfaces. In: Rich RT, Fleisher TA, Shearer WT, Schroeder HW Jr., Frew AJ, Weyand CM, editors. Clinical Immunology Principles And Practice 4th Edition. Elsevier, Saunders; Philadelphia, PA: 2013. pp. 239–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kiyono H, Kunisawa J, McGhee JR, Mestecky J. The Mucosal Immune System. In: Paul WE, editor. Fundamental Immunology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA: 2008. pp. 983–1030. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fujihashi K, Kiyono H. Mucosal immunosenescence: new developments and vaccines to control infectious diseases. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:334–343. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Appay V, Sauce D. Naive T cells: The crux of cellular immune aging? Exp Gerontol. 2014;54C:90–93. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McElhaney JE, Meneilly GS, Beattie BL, Helgason CD, Lee SF, Devine RD, Bleackley RC. The effect of influenza vaccination on IL2 production in healthy elderly: implications for current vaccination practices. J Gerontol. 1992;47:M3–8. doi: 10.1093/geronj/47.1.m3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Powers DC, Belshe RB. Effect of age on cytotoxic T lymphocyte memory as well as serum and local antibody responses elicited by inactivated influenza virus vaccine. J Infect Dis. 1993;167:584–592. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.3.584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saltzman RL, Peterson PK. Immunodeficiency of the elderly. Rev Infect Dis. 1987;9:1127–1139. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.6.1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Asanuma H, Zamri NB, Sekine S, Fukuyama Y, Tokuhara D, Gilbert RS, Fukuiwa T, Fujihashi K, Sata T, Tashiro M, Fujihashi K. A novel combined adjuvant for nasal delivery elicits mucosal immunity to influenza in aging. Vaccine. 2012;30:803–812. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fukuyama Y, King JD, Kataoka K, Kobayashi R, Gilbert RS, Hollingshead SK, Briles DE, Fujihashi K. A combination of Flt3 ligand cDNA and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide as nasal adjuvant elicits protective secretory-IgA immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae in aged mice. J Immunol. 2011;186:2454–2461. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pietschmann P, Hahn P, Kudlacek S, Thomas R, Peterlik M. Surface markers and transendothelial migration of dendritic cells from elderly subjects. Exp Gerontol. 2000;35:213–224. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(99)00089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tesar BM, Walker WE, Unternaehrer J, Joshi NS, Chandele A, Haynes L, Kaech S, Goldstein DR. Murine myeloid dendritic cell-dependent toll-like receptor immunity is preserved with aging. Aging Cell. 2006;5:473–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00245.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Agrawal A, Agrawal S, Cao JN, Su H, Osann K, Gupta S. Altered innate immune functioning of dendritic cells in elderly humans: a role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-signaling pathway. J Immunol. 2007;178:6912–6922. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.6912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Agrawal A, Tay J, Ton S, Agrawal S, Gupta S. Increased reactivity of dendritic cells from aged subjects to self-antigen, the human DNA. J Immunol. 2009;182:1138–1145. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.2.1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Franceschi C, Capri M, Monti D, Giunta S, Olivieri F, Sevini F, Panourgia MP, Invidia L, Celani L, Scurti M, Cevenini E, Castellani GC, Salvioli S. Inflammaging and anti-inflammaging: a systemic perspective on aging and longevity emerged from studies in humans. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007;128:92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Bodegom D, May L, Meij HJ, Westendorp RG. Regulation of human life histories: the role of the inflammatory host response. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1100:84–97. doi: 10.1196/annals.1395.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Franceschi C, Bonafe M, Valensin S, Olivieri F, De Luca M, Ottaviani E, De Benedictis G. Inflamm-aging. An evolutionary perspective on immunosenescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;908:244–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06651.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arranz E, O'Mahony S, Barton JR, Ferguson A. Immunosenescence and mucosal immunity: significant effects of old age on secretory IgA concentrations and intraepithelial lymphocyte counts. Gut. 1992;33:882–886. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.7.882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fujihashi K, McGhee JR. Mucosal immunity and tolerance in the elderly. Mech Ageing Dev. 2004;125:889–898. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2004.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koga T, McGhee JR, Kato H, Kato R, Kiyono H, Fujihashi K. Evidence for early aging in the mucosal immune system. J Immunol. 2000;165:5352–5359. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.9.5352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hagiwara Y, McGhee JR, Fujihashi K, Kobayashi R, Yoshino N, Kataoka K, Etani Y, Kweon MN, Tamura S, Kurata T, Takeda Y, Kiyono H, Fujihashi K. Protective mucosal immunity in aging is associated with functional CD4+ T cells in nasopharyngeal-associated lymphoreticular tissue. J Immunol. 2003;170:1754–1762. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.1754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Faria AM, Garcia G, Rios MJ, Michalaros CL, Vaz NM. Decrease in susceptibility to oral tolerance induction and occurrence of oral immunization to ovalbumin in 20-38-week-old mice. The effect of interval between oral exposures and rate of antigen intake in the oral immunization. Immunology. 1993;78:147–151. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Macpherson AJ, McCoy KD, Johansen FE, Brandtzaeg P. The immune geography of IgA induction and function. Mucosal Immunol. 2008;1:11–22. doi: 10.1038/mi.2007.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tsuji M, Suzuki K, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S. Dynamic interactions between bacteria and immune cells leading to intestinal IgA synthesis. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kurokawa K, Itoh T, Kuwahara T, Oshima K, Toh H, Toyoda A, Takami H, Morita H, Sharma VK, Srivastava TP, Taylor TD, Noguchi H, Mori H, Ogura Y, Ehrlich DS, Itoh K, Takagi T, Sakaki Y, Hayashi T, Hattori M. Comparative metagenomics revealed commonly enriched gene sets in human gut microbiomes. DNA Res. 2007;14:169–181. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsm018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tremaroli V, Backhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012;489:242–249. doi: 10.1038/nature11552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Suzuki K, Fagarasan S. How host-bacterial interactions lead to IgA synthesis in the gut. Trends Immunol. 2008;29:523–531. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Macpherson AJ, Harris NL. Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:478–485. doi: 10.1038/nri1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Klaasen HL, Koopman JP, Van den Brink ME, Van Wezel HP, Beynen AC. Mono-association of mice with non-cultivable, intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria. Arch Microbiol. 1991;156:148–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00290989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shroff KE, Meslin K, Cebra JJ. Commensal enteric bacteria engender a self-limiting humoral mucosal immune response while permanently colonizing the gut. Infect Immun. 1995;63:3904–3913. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.10.3904-3913.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.He B, Xu W, Santini PA, Polydorides AD, Chiu A, Estrella J, Shan M, Chadburn A, Villanacci V, Plebani A, Knowles DM, Rescigno M, Cerutti A. Intestinal bacteria trigger T cell-independent immunoglobulin A(2) class switching by inducing epithelial-cell secretion of the cytokine APRIL. Immunity. 2007;26:812–826. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Suzuki K, Meek B, Doi Y, Muramatsu M, Chiba T, Honjo T, Fagarasan S. Aberrant expansion of segmented filamentous bacteria in IgA-deficient gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 2004;101:1981–1986. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307317101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Obata T, Goto Y, Kunisawa J, Sato S, Sakamoto M, Setoyama H, Matsuki T, Nonaka K, Shibata N, Gohda M, Kagiyama Y, Nochi T, Yuki Y, Fukuyama Y, Mukai A, Shinzaki S, Fujihashi K, Sasakawa C, Iijima H, Goto M, Umesaki Y, Benno Y, Kiyono H. Indigenous opportunistic bacteria inhabit mammalian gut-associated lymphoid tissues and share a mucosal antibody-mediated symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 2010;107:7419–7424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001061107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moreau MC, Gaboriau-Routhiau V. The absence of gut flora, the doses of antigen ingested and aging affect the long-term peripheral tolerance induced by ovalbumin feeding in mice. Res Immunol. 1996;147:49–59. doi: 10.1016/0923-2494(96)81548-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wannemuehler MJ, Kiyono H, Babb JL, Michalek SM, McGhee JR. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) regulation of the immune response: LPS converts germfree mice to sensitivity to oral tolerance induction. J Immunol. 1982;129:959–965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Claesson MJ, Cusack S, O'Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, de Weerd H, Flannery E, Marchesi JR, Falush D, Dinan T, Fitzgerald G, Stanton C, van Sinderen D, O'Connor M, Harnedy N, O'Connor K, Henry C, O'Mahony D, Fitzgerald AP, Shanahan F, Twomey C, Hill C, Ross RP, O'Toole PW. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4586–4591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000097107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Woodmansey EJ. Intestinal bacteria and ageing. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:1178–1186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03400.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Biagi E, Nylund L, Candela M, Ostan R, Bucci L, Pini E, Nikkila J, Monti D, Satokari R, Franceschi C, Brigidi P, De Vos W. Through ageing, and beyond: gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Powers DC. Immunological principles and emerging strategies of vaccination for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:81–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01835.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schmucker DL, Heyworth MF, Owen RL, Daniels CK. Impact of aging on gastrointestinal mucosal immunity. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41:1183–1193. doi: 10.1007/BF02088236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Bridges CB, Cox NJ, Fukuda K. Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. JAMA. 2004;292:1333–1340. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Webster RG. Immunity to influenza in the elderly. Vaccine. 2000;18:1686–1689. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00507-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Harriman GR, Bogue M, Rogers P, Finegold M, Pacheco S, Bradley A, Zhang Y, Mbawuike IN. Targeted deletion of the IgA constant region in mice leads to IgA deficiency with alterations in expression of other Ig isotypes. J Immunol. 1999;162:2521–2529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fukuyama Y, King JD, Kataoka K, Kobayashi R, Gilbert RS, Oishi K, Hollingshead SK, Briles DE, Fujihashi K. Secretory-IgA antibodies play an important role in the immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Immunol. 2010;185:1755–1762. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Galli G, Hancock K, Hoschler K, DeVos J, Praus M, Bardelli M, Malzone C, Castellino F, Gentile C, McNally T, Del Giudice G, Banzhoff A, Brauer V, Montomoli E, Zambon M, Katz J, Nicholson K, Stephenson I. Fast rise of broadly cross-reactive antibodies after boosting long-lived human memory B cells primed by an MF59 adjuvanted prepandemic vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 2009;106:7962–7967. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903181106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jackson LA, Chen WH, Stapleton JT, Dekker CL, Wald A, Brady RC, Edupuganti S, Winokur P, Mulligan MJ, Keyserling HL, Kotloff KL, Rouphael N, Noah DL, Hill H, Wolff MC. Immunogenicity and safety of varying dosages of a monovalent 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine given with and without AS03 adjuvant system in healthy adults and older persons. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:811–820. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Maroof A, Yorgensen YM, Li Y, Evans JT. Intranasal vaccination promotes detrimental Th17-mediated immunity against influenza infection. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003875. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Teijaro JR, Turner D, Pham Q, Wherry EJ, Lefrancois L, Farber DL. Cutting edge: Tissue-retentive lung memory CD4 T cells mediate optimal protection to respiratory virus infection. J Immunol. 2011;187:5510–5514. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fukuiwa T, Sekine S, Kobayashi R, Suzuki H, Kataoka K, Gilbert RS, Kurono Y, Boyaka PN, Krieg AM, McGhee JR, Fujihashi K. A combination of Flt3 ligand cDNA and CpG ODN as nasal adjuvant elicits NALT dendritic cells for prolonged mucosal immunity. Vaccine. 2008;26:4849–4859. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kataoka K, McGhee JR, Kobayashi R, Fujihashi K, Shizukuishi S, Fujihashi K. Nasal Flt3 ligand cDNA elicits CD11c+ CD8+ dendritic cells for enhanced mucosal immunity. J Immunol. 2004;172:3612–3619. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sekine S, Kataoka K, Fukuyama Y, Adachi Y, Davydova J, Yamamoto M, Kobayashi R, Fujihashi K, Suzuki H, Curiel DT, Shizukuishi S, McGhee JR, Fujihashi K. A novel adenovirus expressing Flt3 ligand enhances mucosal immunity by inducing mature nasopharyngeal-associated lymphoreticular tissue dendritic cell migration. J Immunol. 2008;180:8126–8134. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.12.8126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Moretto MM, Lawlor EM, Khan IA. Aging mice exhibit a functional defect in mucosal dendritic cell response against an intracellular pathogen. J Immunol. 2008;181:7977–7984. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.11.7977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Alignani D, Maletto B, Liscovsky M, Ropolo A, Moron G, Pistoresi-Palencia MC. Orally administered OVA/CpG-ODN induces specific mucosal and systemic immune response in young and aged mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;77:898–905. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0604330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nibert ML, Furlong DB, Fields BN. Mechanisms of viral pathogenesis. Distinct forms of reoviruses and their roles during replication in cells and host. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:727–734. doi: 10.1172/JCI115369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wu Y, Wang X, Csencsits KL, Haddad A, Walters N, Pascual DW. M cell-targeted DNA vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 2001;98:9318–9323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161204098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nochi T, Yuki Y, Matsumura A, Mejima M, Terahara K, Kim DY, Fukuyama S, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Kawaoka Y, Kohda T, Kozaki S, Igarashi O, Kiyono H. A novel M cell-specific carbohydrate-targeted mucosal vaccine effectively induces antigen-specific immune responses. J Exp Med. 2007;204:2789–2796. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kim SH, Seo KW, Kim J, Lee KY, Jang YS. The M cell-targeting ligand promotes antigen delivery and induces antigen-specific immune responses in mucosal vaccination. J Immunol. 2010;185:5787–5795. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Terahara K, Yoshida M, Igarashi O, Nochi T, Pontes GS, Hase K, Ohno H, Kurokawa S, Mejima M, Takayama N, Yuki Y, Lowe AW, Kiyono H. Comprehensive gene expression profiling of Peyer's patch M cells, villous M-like cells, and intestinal epithelial cells. J Immunol. 2008;180:7840–7846. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.12.7840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hase K, Kawano K, Nochi T, Pontes GS, Fukuda S, Ebisawa M, Kadokura K, Tobe T, Fujimura Y, Kawano S, Yabashi A, Waguri S, Nakato G, Kimura S, Murakami T, Iimura M, Hamura K, Fukuoka S, Lowe AW, Itoh K, Kiyono H, Ohno H. Uptake through glycoprotein 2 of FimH(+) bacteria by M cells initiates mucosal immune response. Nature. 2009;462:226–230. doi: 10.1038/nature08529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tahoun A, Mahajan S, Paxton E, Malterer G, Donaldson DS, Wang D, Tan A, Gillespie TL, O'Shea M, Roe AJ, Shaw DJ, Gally DL, Lengeling A, Mabbott NA, Haas J, Mahajan A. Salmonella transforms follicle-associated epithelial cells into M cells to promote intestinal invasion. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:645–656. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sato S, Kaneto S, Shibata N, Takahashi Y, Okura H, Yuki Y, Kunisawa J, Kiyono H. Transcription factor Spi-B-dependent and -independent pathways for the development of Peyer's patch M cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2013;6:838–846. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kanaya T, Hase K, Takahashi D, Fukuda S, Hoshino K, Sasaki I, Hemmi H, Knoop KA, Kumar N, Sato M, Katsuno T, Yokosuka O, Toyooka K, Nakai K, Sakamoto A, Kitahara Y, Jinnohara T, McSorley SJ, Kaisho T, Williams IR, Ohno H. The Ets transcription factor Spi-B is essential for the differentiation of intestinal microfold cells. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:729–736. doi: 10.1038/ni.2352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.de Lau W, Kujala P, Schneeberger K, Middendorp S, Li VS, Barker N, Martens A, Hofhuis F, DeKoter RP, Peters PJ, Nieuwenhuis E, Clevers H. Peyer's patch M cells derived from Lgr5(+) stem cells require SpiB and are induced by RankL in cultured “miniguts”. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:3639–3647. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00434-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kobayashi A, Donaldson DS, Erridge C, Kanaya T, Williams IR, Ohno H, Mahajan A, Mabbott NA. The functional maturation of M cells is dramatically reduced in the Peyer's patches of aged mice. Mucosal Immunol. 2013;6:1027–1037. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES