Skip to main content
Cell & Bioscience logoLink to Cell & Bioscience
. 2015 May 27;5:24. doi: 10.1186/s13578-015-0013-2

Association of aberrant DNA methylation in Apcmin/+ mice with the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and Wnt/β-catenin pathways: genome-wide analysis using MeDIP-seq

Yue Guo 1,2,#, Jong Hun Lee 5,#, Limin Shu 2, Ying Huang 1,2, Wenji Li 2, Chengyue Zhang 1,2, Anne Yuqing Yang 1,2, Sarandeep SS Boyanapalli 1,2, Ansu Perekatt 3, Ronald P Hart 4, Michael Verzi 3, Ah-Ng Tony Kong 2,
PMCID: PMC4476183  PMID: 26101583

Abstract

Background

Aberrant DNA methylation at the 5-carbon on cytosine residues (5mC) in CpG dinucleotides is probably the most extensively characterized epigenetic modification in colon cancer. It has been suggested that the loss of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) function initiates tumorigenesis and that additional genetic and epigenetic events are involved in colon cancer progression. We aimed to study the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles of intestinal tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice.

Results

Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) followed by next-generation sequencing was used to determine the global profile of DNA methylation changes in Apcmin/+ mice. DNA was extracted from adenomatous polyps from Apcmin/+ mice and from normal intestinal tissue from age-matched Apc+/+ littermates, and the MeDIP-seq assay was performed. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software was used to analyze the data for gene interactions. A total of 17,265 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) displayed a ≥ 2-fold change (log2) in methylation in Apcmin/+ mice; among these DMRs, 9,078 (52.6 %) and 8,187 (47.4 %) exhibited increased and decreased methylation, respectively. Genes with altered methylation patterns were mainly mapped to networks and biological functions associated with cancer and gastrointestinal diseases. Among these networks, several canonical pathways, such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and Wnt/β-catenin pathways, were significantly associated with genome-wide methylation changes in polyps from Apcmin/+ mice. The identification of certain differentially methylated molecules in the EMT and Wnt/β-catenin pathways, such as APC2 (adenomatosis polyposis coli 2), SFRP2 (secreted frizzled-related protein 2), and DKK3 (dickkopf-related protein 3), was consistent with previous publications.

Conclusions

Our findings indicated that Apcmin/+ mice exhibited extensive aberrant DNA methylation that affected certain signaling pathways, such as the EMT and Wnt/β-catenin pathways. The genome-wide DNA methylation profile of Apcmin/+ mice is informative for future studies investigating epigenetic gene regulation in colon tumorigenesis and the prevention of colon cancer.

Keywords: DNA methylation, Epigenetic, MeDIP-seq, Wnt/β-catenin pathway, Epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway

Introduction

It is widely accepted that the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations contributes to cancer initiation and progression. Genetic alterations refer to mutations in tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes, whereas epigenetic modifications involve changes in chromatin structure that result in altered gene expression without primary changes to the DNA sequence [1]. The information conveyed by epigenetic modifications plays a vital role in regulating DNA-mediated processes, including transcription, DNA repair, and replication [2]. Specifically, aberrant DNA methylation at the 5-carbon on cytosine residues (5mC) in CpG dinucleotides is perhaps the most extensively characterized epigenetic modification in cancer. DNA methylation affects the rate of gene transcription and therefore regulates various biological processes, such as proliferation, apoptosis, DNA repair, cancer initiation, and cancer progression [3]. The genomic DNA methylation pattern is stably maintained in normal cells; however, aberrant alterations in the epigenome have been identified in tumor cells [4]. Evidence suggests that global hypomethylation and regional hypermethylation are characteristics of cancer cells [5]. Global genome-wide loss of methylation has been associated with increased genomic instability and proto-oncogene activation, whereas DNA hypermethylation of CpG islands in promoter regions silences tumor suppressor genes [6]. Unlike genetic mutations, the transcriptional repression of genes via epigenetic alterations can be reversed by further epigenetic modifications because these silenced genes remain genetically intact [7]. Thus, it is very important to profile the global DNA methylation changes that occur in early tumorigenesis.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in western countries [8], and more than 80 % of CRC patients harbor a mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene on chromosome 5q21 [9]. APC is a tumor suppressor gene that down-regulates the pro-proliferative Wnt-signaling pathway by promoting the destruction of β-catenin. Deleterious mutations in APC stabilize β-catenin, increase its translocation into the nucleus, promote its binding to the transcription factor TCF4, and activate target genes such as C-MYC and CCND1 [10, 11]. It has been suggested that the loss of APC function initiates tumorigenesis and that additional genetic and epigenetic events are involved in colon cancer progression [12]. Numerous genes that are silenced by epigenetic mechanisms have been identified in colon cancer, including CDKN2A [13], DKK1 [14], DLEC1 [15, 16], UNC5C [17], and SFRP [18]. However, the genome-wide profile of the aberrant methylation and the association of these methylation patterns with important signaling pathways and biological networks implicated in colon tumorigenesis remain unclear.

To address this issue, we examined the global DNA methylation profile in the well-established Apcmin/+ intestinal tumorigenesis mouse model using methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and next-generation sequencing (MeDIP-seq). Apcmin/+ mice carry a heterozygous mutation in Apc and develop approximately 30 small intestinal adenomatous polyps following the somatic loss of functional Apc [19]. This mouse model of intestinal tumorigenesis is commonly used because the phenotype resembles that of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) [20]. We analyzed adenomatous polyps from Apcmin/+ mice and not only identified genes with a modified methylation profile but also interpreted the data in the context of biological function, networks, and canonical signaling pathways associated with the methylation patterns.

Results

MeDIP-seq results

To identify changes in DNA methylation patterns during the progression of mouse intestinal polyps, whole-genome DNA methylation analysis was performed using the described MeDIP-seq method. The global differences in the DNA methylation profile between adenomatous polyps from Apcmin/+ mice and intestinal tissue from control mice are described in Fig. 1. We identified 12,761,009 mapped peaks and 2,868,549 non-mapped peaks from a total of 15,629,558 peaks in control mice and 11,470,541 mapped peaks and 2,262,073 non-mapped peaks from a total of 13,732,614 peaks in Apcmin/+ mice (Fig. 1a). A total of 17,265 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) had a ≥ 2-fold change (log2) in methylation in Apcmin/+ mice compared with control mice, of which 9,078 DMRs (52.6 %) exhibited increased methylation, and 8,187 (47.4 %) DMRs exhibited decreased methylation (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Global changes in the DNA methylation profile between Apc mutant adenomatous polyps and control tissue. a, Total number of peaks generated by MeDIP-seq. b, Number of DMRs with significantly increased or decreased changes in methylation (≥2-fold in log2) in polyps from Apcmin/+ mice

Functional and pathway analysis by IPA

To identify the biological function, networks, and canonical pathways that were affected by the differentially methylated genes, we performed Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) after the MeDIP-seq analysis. In the analysis of genes with altered methylation (≥2-fold in log2) in Apcmin/+ mice compared with control mice as determined by MeDIP-seq, IPA mapped 5,464 unique genes that were associated with its knowledge base. The top 50 genes with increased and decreased methylation levels based on log2 fold change are listed in Tables 1 and 2. The molecules with methylation changes were mainly categorized into 38 disease and biological functions. The five highest IPA-rated disease and biological functions were as follows: cancer, gastrointestinal disease, organismal injury and abnormalities, cellular growth and proliferation, and reproductive system disease (Fig. 2). Among the IPA-mapped genes with differential methylation patterns in polyps from Apcmin/+ mice, 3,299 were associated with cancer, and 1,668 were associated with gastrointestinal diseases. To examine the interaction networks that were affected by DNA methylation in Apc mutant polyps, IPA identified 25 networks with up to 35 focus molecules in each network. The five most affected gene networks as determined by IPA are shown in Table 3, and the detailed interactions in the most significant networks (cancer, cell cycle, and molecular transport) are presented in Fig. 3. In accordance with the most relevant biological functions as determined by IPA, genes with different methylation patterns predominantly mapped to the networks associated with cancer and gastrointestinal diseases. Taken together, these results suggested an important role for the altered methylation of genes associated with the development of cancer and gut disease in Apcmin/+ mice.

Table 1.

Top 50 annotated genes with increased methylation

Rank Symbol Gene name log2 Fold Change Location Type(s)
1 ZNF330 zinc finger protein 330 4.614 Nucleus other
2 ACTR3B ARP3 actin-related protein 3 homolog B (yeast) 4.540 Other other
3 CAV3 caveolin 3 4.292 Plasma Membrane enzyme
4 NKX2-3 NK2 homeobox 3 4.199 Nucleus transcription regulator
5 TLN2 talin 2 4.199 Nucleus other
6 CPD carboxypeptidase D 4.100 Extracellular Space peptidase
7 CTNNBL1 catenin, beta like 1 4.100 Nucleus other
8 Vmn2r1 vomeronasal 2, receptor 1 4.100 Plasma Membrane other
9 Cmtm2a CKLF-like MARVEL transmembrane domain containing 2A 3.993 Cytoplasm transcription regulator
10 HPS6 Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 6 3.993 Cytoplasm other
11 KANK1 KN motif and ankyrin repeat domains 1 3.993 Nucleus transcription regulator
12 RRP1 ribosomal RNA processing 1 3.993 Nucleus other
13 SNX10 sorting nexin 10 3.993 Cytoplasm transporter
14 UNC93A unc-93 homolog A (C. elegans) 3.993 Plasma Membrane other
15 Zfp932 zinc finger protein 932 3.993 Nucleus other
16 ANKRD13D ankyrin repeat domain 13 family, member D 3.877 Plasma Membrane other
17 DACT1 dishevelled-binding antagonist of beta-catenin 1 3.877 Cytoplasm other
18 DMRT2 doublesex and mab-3 related transcription factor 2 3.877 Nucleus other
19 DSC3 desmocollin 3 3.877 Plasma Membrane other
20 LDOC1 leucine zipper, down-regulated in cancer 1 3.877 Nucleus other
21 LRRC8B leucine rich repeat containing 8 family, member B 3.877 Other other
22 SEPP1 selenoprotein P, plasma, 1 3.877 Extracellular Space other
23 SMAD3 SMAD family member 3 3.877 Nucleus transcription regulator
24 Smok2a sperm motility kinase 2B 3.877 Other other
25 TCEAL3 transcription elongation factor A (SII)-like 3 3.877 Other other
26 TNS1 tensin 1 3.877 Plasma Membrane other
27 TRHR thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor 3.877 Plasma Membrane G-protein coupled receptor
28 WWC1 WW and C2 domain containing 1 3.877 Cytoplasm transcription regulator
29 PER2 period circadian clock 2 3.853 Nucleus other
30 BHLHE23 basic helix-loop-helix family, member e23 3.752 Nucleus transcription regulator
31 GALNT13 UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 13 (GalNAc-T13) 3.752 Cytoplasm enzyme
32 KCNF1 potassium voltage-gated channel, subfamily F, member 1 3.752 Plasma Membrane ion channel
33 MPP1 membrane protein, palmitoylated 1, 55 kDa 3.752 Plasma Membrane kinase
34 OPA1 optic atrophy 1 (autosomal dominant) 3.752 Cytoplasm enzyme
35 PTP4A1 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 3.752 Cytoplasm phosphatase
36 SGCZ sarcoglycan, zeta 3.752 Plasma Membrane other
37 ADCY7 adenylate cyclase 7 3.614 Plasma Membrane enzyme
38 ALCAM activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule 3.614 Plasma Membrane other
39 AR androgen receptor 3.614 Nucleus ligand-dependent nuclear receptor
40 C4orf33 chromosome 4 open reading frame 33 3.614 Other other
41 CCNH cyclin H 3.614 Nucleus transcription regulator
42 CDKN1A cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21, Cip1) 3.614 Nucleus kinase
43 CDV3 CDV3 homolog (mouse) 3.614 Cytoplasm other
44 COMT catechol-O-methyltransferase 3.614 Cytoplasm enzyme
45 CRYGC crystallin, gamma C 3.614 Cytoplasm other
46 FAM13A family with sequence similarity 13, member A 3.614 Cytoplasm other
47 IGF1R insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor 3.614 Plasma Membrane transmembrane receptor
48 IYD iodotyrosine deiodinase 3.614 Plasma Membrane enzyme
49 JAG1 jagged 1 3.614 Extracellular Space growth factor
50 KCNMA1 potassium large conductance calcium-activated channel, subfamily M, alpha member 1 3.614 Plasma Membrane ion channel

Table 2.

Top 50 annotated genes with decreased methylation

Rank Symbol Gene name log2 Fold Change Location Type(s)
1 IRX1 iroquois homeobox 1 −5.897 Nucleus transcription regulator
2 OSBP2 oxysterol binding protein 2 −5.408 Cytoplasm other
3 CAPN5 calpain 5 −5.231 Cytoplasm peptidase
4 INTS9 integrator complex subunit 9 −4.837 Nucleus other
5 TRIML1 tripartite motif family-like 1 −4.837 Other other
6 CSMD1 CUB and Sushi multiple domains 1 −4.614 Plasma Membrane other
7 NCOR2 nuclear receptor corepressor 2 −4.272 Nucleus transcription regulator
8 C6orf89 chromosome 6 open reading frame 89 −4.167 Other other
9 TMEM242 transmembrane protein 242 −4.167 Other other
10 DCLRE1A DNA cross-link repair 1A −4.100 Nucleus other
11 EDNRA endothelin receptor type A −3.877 Plasma Membrane transmembrane receptor
12 GALNT11 UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 11 (GalNAc-T11) −3.877 Cytoplasm enzyme
13 PTPN11 protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11 −3.877 Cytoplasm phosphatase
14 AGPAT9 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 9 −3.795 Cytoplasm enzyme
15 IER5 immediate early response 5 −3.795 Other other
16 PPM1D protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent, 1D −3.708 Cytoplasm phosphatase
17 RBBP6 retinoblastoma binding protein 6 −3.708 Nucleus enzyme
18 BLOC1S2 biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex-1, subunit 2 −3.614 Cytoplasm other
19 CPEB2 cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 2 −3.614 Cytoplasm other
20 ECI2 enoyl-CoA delta isomerase 2 −3.614 Cytoplasm enzyme
21 MMGT1 membrane magnesium transporter 1 −3.614 Cytoplasm transporter
22 NALCN sodium leak channel, non-selective −3.614 Plasma Membrane ion channel
23 RETNLB resistin like beta −3.614 Extracellular Space other
24 AMD1 adenosylmethionine decarboxylase 1 −3.515 Cytoplasm enzyme
25 C1orf198 chromosome 1 open reading frame 198 −3.515 Other other
26 DGKI diacylglycerol kinase, iota −3.515 Cytoplasm kinase
27 DYNLT3 dynein, light chain, Tctex-type 3 −3.515 Cytoplasm other
28 EPHA6 EPH receptor A6 −3.515 Plasma Membrane kinase
29 GABRA6 gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor, alpha 6 −3.515 Plasma Membrane ion channel
30 Gk2 glycerol kinase 2 −3.515 Cytoplasm other
31 GLT1D1 glycosyltransferase 1 domain containing 1 −3.515 Extracellular Space enzyme
32 HMGN2 high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 −3.515 Nucleus other
33 KLHL17 kelch-like family member 17 −3.515 Cytoplasm other
34 Olfr266 olfactory receptor 266 −3.515 Plasma Membrane G-protein coupled receptor
35 Ott ovary testis transcribed −3.515 Other other
36 P2RX7 purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 7 −3.515 Plasma Membrane ion channel
37 PTER phosphotriesterase related −3.515 Other enzyme
38 Rnf213 ring finger protein 213 −3.515 Cytoplasm enzyme
39 SERPINC1 serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade C (antithrombin), member 1 −3.515 Extracellular Space enzyme
40 TPD52L1 tumor protein D52-like 1 −3.515 Cytoplasm other
41 ZMAT4 zinc finger, matrin-type 4 −3.515 Nucleus other
42 RBM20 RNA binding motif protein 20 −3.462 Nucleus other
43 BEGAIN brain-enriched guanylate kinase-associated −3.408 Nucleus other
44 CHSY3 chondroitin sulfate synthase 3 −3.408 Cytoplasm enzyme
45 CKAP4 cytoskeleton-associated protein 4 −3.408 Cytoplasm other
46 DPF3 D4, zinc and double PHD fingers, family 3 −3.408 Other other
47 Ear2 eosinophil-associated, ribonuclease A family, member 2 −3.408 Cytoplasm enzyme
48 FAM135B family with sequence similarity 135, member B −3.408 Other enzyme
49 POT1 protection of telomeres 1 −3.408 Nucleus other
50 POU6F1 POU class 6 homeobox 1 −3.408 Nucleus transcription regulator

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The 5 most significant biological functions and diseases related to changes in the methylation patterns. The number of molecules in the dataset associated with a known function was determined by IPA functional analysis

Table 3.

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of gene networks

Rank Molecules in network Score Focus molecules Top function
1 ↑AMOT,↑ANKRD26,↑CDKN1A,↓CEP152,↓CGGBP1,↓CPA3,↑CPVL, ↓DYNLL2, ↑EID2, ↓ELAC2, ↑EPB41L2, ↑EPB41L3, ↑FRMD6, ↑KIAA0195, ↑MAGEB1, ↑MBNL1, ↑MBNL2, ↑N4BP2L2, ↓NKD2, ↑NSA2, ↑RASSF4, ↓RASSF8, ↑RNF34, ↓SERPINI2, ↑SLC30A5, ↓SLC30A6, ↑SP110, ↑SP140, ↓SPAG5, ↑SYF2, ↓TROAP, ↑TXNDC11, ↑VGLL4, ↑WNT16, ↑WWC1 30 35 Cancer, Cell Cycle, Molecular Transport
2 ↑ACACA, ↓ATRNL1, ↓BHMT, ↑CYP2A13, ↓Cyp2c70, ↑CYP3A43, ↓DCLRE1A, ↑E330013P04Rik, ↓FASN, ↑GPC6, ↑GSTP1, ↓HNMT, ↓IVNS1ABP, ↓Keg1, ↓Lcn4, ↑LRTM1, ↓MC4R, ↓Mill1, ↑MRGPRX3, ↑MT1E, ↑MTF1, ↑NR1H4, ↑RORA, ↑SLC13A1, ↑SLC16A7, ↓SLC29A4, ↓SLC30A1, ↓SLC38A4, ↑SULT1C3, ↓TMC6, ↓UCP1, ↑UPP2, ↓Xlr3c (includes others), ↑ZNF275, ↓ZNF292 30 35 Renal Damage, Renal Tubule Injury, Molecular Transport
3 ↑ABTB2, ↑ALKBH8, ↑ALPK1, ↓BCKDHB, ↑BTBD7, ↑C11orf70, ↑C20orf194, ↑CAMKV, ↓CCDC39, ↑CUL2, ↓CUL3, ↑DCLK2, ↑EGFLAM, ↑FAM98A, ↓FARS2, ↑FBXO10, ↑FBXO34, ↑G2E3, ↓G3BP2, ↑HSP90AA1, ↓KCNG1, ↓KCNS3, ↓KCTD8, ↑KLHL10, ↓KLHL14, ↑KLHL29, ↑KLHL32, ↑KLHL36, ↑KRR1, ↑QDPR, ↑RCBTB1, ↓SEPHS1, ↓UST, ↓YWHAE, ↑ZBED4 30 35 Hereditary Disorder, Respiratory Disease, Metabolic Disease
4 ↓ABCA6, ↓ABLIM3, ↓ABRA, ↑AIF1L, ↓AMBRA1, ↓ARAP2, ↓ARL6, ↓ATL2, ↓CAPN5, ↑CAPN6, ↓CASP12,CD80/CD86, ↑CLEC2D, ↑CLEC6A, ↑CRTAM, ↑GBP5, ↑Gbp8,Gbp6 (includes others), ↑GFM1, ↑GIMAP1-GIMAP5, ↑Gvin1 (includes others), ↑HERC6, ↑IFNG, ↓KIAA0226, ↓KIF16B,↑KLRB1, ↓KMO, ↓KY, ↑LAMP3, ↑LIX1, ↓Neurl3, ↑PCDH17, ↑Phb, ↑PILRB, ↓PMP2 28 34 Endocrine System Disorders, Gastrointestinal Disease, Immunological Disease
5 ↑AFF2, ↑AP4S1, ↑ASAP2, ↓C21orf91, ↑C2orf88, ↑DLGAP1, ↑Eif2s3x, ↓FAM110A, ↑GNS, ↑GRB2, ↑HDGFRP3, ↓KCNH7, ↓KIRREL, ↑KRT83, ↑LRFN4, ↑MEPE, ↑NCK1, ↑NCKAP5, ↓PANX2, ↑PHACTR2, ↑RALGAPA2, ↓RALGPS1, ↑SEPN1, ↑SH2D4A, ↑SHANK2, ↓SHROOM2, ↓SLCO2A1, ↑SNX8, ↑SNX12, ↑SNX18, ↓SPRY, ↑TJAP1, ↑TTYH2, ↑WDR44, ↑ZNF32 28 34 Cellular Assembly and Organization, Tissue Development, Cellular Function and Maintenance

↑, increased methylation; ↓, decreased methylation

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The most significant networks determined by IPA: cancer, cell cycle, and molecular transport. The IPA network analysis was conducted using the genes that were differentially methylated and their close relationships. IPA used triangle connectivity based on 30 focus genes and built the network according to the number of interactions between a single gene and others in the existing network. Red, increased methylation; green, decreased methylation

Canonical pathways associated with methylation changes in Apc mutant polyps were analyzed based on the ratio of the number of input genes to the total number of reference genes in the corresponding pathways in the IPA knowledge bases. Fisher’s exact test was employed to calculate the P values to determine whether the associations between the differentially methylated genes and the canonical pathways were significant or random. Using a cutoff value of P < 0.05, IPA identified 84 significant signaling pathways that contained genes with increased or decreased methylation. The 15 most significant pathways that correlated with methylation changes in polyps are presented in Fig. 4. Notably, regulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway was mapped by IPA and ranked as the 4th most significant canonical pathway associated with altered methylation. According to the IPA knowledge bases, the regulation of the EMT pathway includes 196 molecules. Among these molecules, 62 displayed greater than a 2 fold change (log2) in methylation in the polyps from Apcmin/+ mice by MeDIP-seq. The abnormal methylation changes in the EMT pathway included alterations in the methylation profiles of kinases, peptidases, phosphatases, transcription regulators, transmembrane receptors, and microRNAs. Tables 4 and 5 lists the genes involved in the EMT pathway that exhibited altered methylation (37 genes with increased methylation in Table 4; 25 genes with decreased methylation in Table 5). Signaling pathways, such as the Wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β, NOTCH, and receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways, can initiate an EMT program alone or in combination [21]. Although the genes that were determined to have differential methylation patterns in polyps by MeDIP-seq were not significantly associated with the TGF-β, NOTCH, and RTK signaling pathways, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway was identified as one of the most significant canonical pathways implicated based on methylation changes in the polyps (ranked 11th). Specifically, 53 out of 175 molecules in this pathway showed methylation changes of greater than 2-fold (log2) in polyps from Apcmin/+ mice; these molecules are listed in Tables 6 and 7 (30 genes with increased methylation in Table 6; 23 genes with decreased methylation in Table 7). Additionally, we found many shared genes in the EMT and Wnt/β-catenin pathways with altered methylation levels; these genes are shown in bold in Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7. To understand the role of DNA methylation in the crosstalk between the EMT and Wnt/β-catenin pathways in Apcmin/+ mice, IPA was utilized to predict the direct interaction of the differentially methylated genes in these two pathways based on the publication database (Fig. 5). The pathway analysis of the MeDIP-seq data suggested that cellular changes mediated via the EMT and Wnt/β-catenin pathways may be significantly associated with altered DNA methylation in polyps from Apcmin/+ mice.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The 15 most significant canonical pathways related to changes in the methylation patterns. The left y-axis (bar graph) presents the data as the log (p-value) of each pathway using Fisher’s exact test. The right y-axis (line graph) corresponds to the ratio data for each pathway. The ratios were calculated as the number of input molecules mapped to a specific pathway divided by the total number of molecules in the given pathway

Table 4.

Genes with increased methylation that mapped to the regulation of the EMT pathway by IPA

Symbol Gene name log2 Fold Change Location Type(s)
SMAD3 SMAD family member 3 3.877 Nucleus transcription regulator
JAG1 jagged 1 3.614 Extracellular Space growth factor
WNT5A wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 5A 3.292 Extracellular Space cytokine
FGF13 fibroblast growth factor 13 3.100 Extracellular Space growth factor
WNT10A wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 10A 3.100 Extracellular Space other
EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor 2.877 Plasma Membrane kinase
FGF7 fibroblast growth factor 7 2.877 Extracellular Space growth factor
FGF14 fibroblast growth factor 14 2.877 Extracellular Space growth factor
ID2 inhibitor of DNA binding 2, dominant negative helix-loop-helix protein 2.877 Nucleus transcription regulator
PIK3C2A phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit type 2 alpha 2.877 Cytoplasm kinase
FZD1 frizzled class receptor 1 2.752 Plasma Membrane G-protein coupled receptor
CDH12 cadherin 12, type 2 (N-cadherin 2) 2.614 Plasma Membrane other
FGF8 fibroblast growth factor 8 (androgen-induced) 2.614 Extracellular Space growth factor
FZD8 frizzled class receptor 8 2.614 Plasma Membrane G-protein coupled receptor
JAK2 Janus kinase 2 2.614 Cytoplasm kinase
PIK3C2G phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit type 2 gamma 2.614 Cytoplasm kinase
ZEB1 zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 2.614 Nucleus transcription regulator
GSC goosecoid homeobox 2.462 Nucleus transcription regulator
ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 2.292 Plasma Membrane peptidase
FGF9 fibroblast growth factor 9 2.292 Extracellular Space growth factor
FGF11 fibroblast growth factor 11 2.292 Extracellular Space growth factor
FGFR2 fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 2.292 Plasma Membrane kinase
FRS2 fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 2.292 Plasma Membrane other
GRB2 growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 2.292 Cytoplasm other
LOX lysyl oxidase 2.292 Extracellular Space enzyme
NCSTN nicastrin 2.292 Plasma Membrane peptidase
PARD6B par-6 family cell polarity regulator beta 2.292 Plasma Membrane other
PIK3CG phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit gamma 2.292 Cytoplasm kinase
PIK3R1 phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit 1 (alpha) 2.292 Cytoplasm kinase
SOS2 son of sevenless homolog 2 (Drosophila) 2.292 Cytoplasm other
TGFB2 transforming growth factor, beta 2 2.292 Extracellular Space growth factor
WNT2 wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 2 2.292 Extracellular Space cytokine
MET MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase 2.180 Plasma Membrane kinase
AKT3 v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 3 2.100 Cytoplasm kinase
TWIST2 twist family bHLH transcription factor 2 2.100 Nucleus transcription regulator
WNT2B wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 2B 2.100 Extracellular Space other
WNT16 wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 16 2.029 Extracellular Space other

Table 5.

Genes with decreased methylation that mapped to the regulation of the EMT pathway by IPA

Symbol Gene name log2 Fold Change Location Type(s)
PTPN11 protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11 −3.877 Cytoplasm phosphatase
PDGFD platelet derived growth factor D −3.167 Extracellular Space growth factor
RRAS2 related RAS viral (r-ras) oncogene homolog 2 −3.090 Plasma Membrane enzyme
FGF10 fibroblast growth factor 10 −2.877 Extracellular Space growth factor
FGF12 fibroblast growth factor 12 −2.877 Extracellular Space other
CDH2 cadherin 2, type 1, N-cadherin (neuronal) −2.708 Plasma Membrane other
ETS1 v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 1 −2.708 Nucleus transcription regulator
mir-155 microRNA 155 −2.708 Cytoplasm microRNA
PIK3C3 phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, catalytic subunit type 3 −2.708 Cytoplasm growth factor
PSEN2 presenilin 2 −2.708 Cytoplasm peptidase
TGFB3 transforming growth factor, beta 3 −2.708 Extracellular Space growth factor
SOS1 son of sevenless homolog 1 (Drosophila) −2.515 Cytoplasm other
WNT11 wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 11 −2.515 Extracellular Space other
SMAD4 SMAD family member 4 −2.292 Nucleus transcription regulator
WNT7A wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 7A −2.292 Extracellular Space cytokine
SMAD2 SMAD family member 2 −2.167 Nucleus transcription regulator
TCF7L1 transcription factor 7-like 1 (T-cell specific, HMG-box) −2.167 Nucleus transcription regulator
CLDN3 claudin 3 −2.029 Plasma Membrane transmembrane receptor
GAB1 GRB2-associated binding protein 1 −2.029 Cytoplasm other
HMGA2 -- −2.029 Other other
RAF1 Raf-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase −2.029 Cytoplasm kinase
TCF7L2 transcription factor 7-like 2 (T-cell specific, HMG-box) −2.029 Nucleus transcription regulator
TWIST1 twist family bHLH transcription factor 1 −2.029 Nucleus transcription regulator
WNT7B wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 7B −2.029 Extracellular Space other
WNT8B wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 8B −2.029 Extracellular Space other

Table 6.

Genes with increased methylation that mapped to the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by IPA

Symbol Gene name log2 Fold Change Location Type(s)
SOX11 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 11 3.614 Nucleus transcription regulator
TLE1 transducin-like enhancer of split 1 (E(sp1) homolog, Drosophila) 3.462 Nucleus transcription regulator
SOX2 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2 3.292 Nucleus transcription regulator
WNT5A wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 5A 3.292 Extracellular Space cytokine
WNT10A wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 10A 3.100 Extracellular Space other
CDH5 cadherin 5, type 2 (vascular endothelium) 2.877 Plasma Membrane other
DKK3 dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 3 2.877 Extracellular Space cytokine
HDAC1 histone deacetylase 1 2.877 Nucleus transcription regulator
PPP2R3A protein phosphatase 2, regulatory subunit B”, alpha 2.877 Nucleus phosphatase
RUVBL2 RuvB-like AAA ATPase 2 2.877 Nucleus transcription regulator
UBD ubiquitin D 2.877 Nucleus other
FZD1 frizzled class receptor 1 2.752 Plasma Membrane G-protein coupled receptor
CDH12 cadherin 12, type 2 (N-cadherin 2) 2.614 Plasma Membrane other
FZD8 frizzled class receptor 8 2.614 Plasma Membrane G-protein coupled receptor
MYC v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog 2.614 Nucleus transcription regulator
SOX4 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 4 2.614 Nucleus transcription regulator
SOX6 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 6 2.614 Nucleus transcription regulator
APC2 adenomatosis polyposis coli 2 2.292 Cytoplasm enzyme
APPL2 adaptor protein, phosphotyrosine interaction, PH domain and leucine zipper containing 2 2.292 Cytoplasm other
CSNK2A1 casein kinase 2, alpha 1 polypeptide 2.292 Cytoplasm kinase
MMP7 matrix metallopeptidase 7 (matrilysin, uterine) 2.292 Extracellular Space peptidase
NR5A2 nuclear receptor subfamily 5, group A, member 2 2.292 Nucleus ligand-dependent nuclear receptor
PIN1 peptidylprolyl cis/trans isomerase, NIMA-interacting 1 2.292 Nucleus enzyme
TGFB2 transforming growth factor, beta 2 2.292 Extracellular Space growth factor
WNT2 wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 2 2.292 Extracellular Space cytokine
AKT3 v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 3 2.100 Cytoplasm kinase
FRAT1 frequently rearranged in advanced T-cell lymphomas 2.100 Cytoplasm other
WNT2B wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 2B 2.100 Extracellular Space other
WNT16 wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 16 2.029 Extracellular Space other

Table 7.

Genes with decreased methylation that mapped to the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by IPA

Symbol Gene name log2 Fold Change Location Type(s)
ACVR1C activin A receptor, type IC −3.029 Plasma Membrane kinase
GNAQ guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), q polypeptide −2.877 Plasma Membrane enzyme
SOX13 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 13 −2.877 Nucleus transcription regulator
WIF1 WNT inhibitory factor 1 −2.877 Extracellular Space other
CDH2 cadherin 2, type 1, N-cadherin (neuronal) −2.708 Plasma Membrane other
PPP2R2A protein phosphatase 2, regulatory subunit B, alpha −2.708 Cytoplasm phosphatase
TGFB3 transforming growth factor, beta 3 −2.708 Extracellular Space growth factor
PPP2R1B protein phosphatase 2, regulatory subunit A, beta −2.614 Plasma Membrane phosphatase
CSNK1G3 casein kinase 1, gamma 3 −2.515 Cytoplasm kinase
WNT11 wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 11 −2.515 Extracellular Space other
MARK2 MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2 −2.292 Cytoplasm kinase
WNT7A wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 7A −2.292 Extracellular Space cytokine
TCF7L1 transcription factor 7-like 1 (T-cell specific, HMG-box) −2.167 Nucleus transcription regulator
GJA1 gap junction protein, alpha 1, 43 kDa −2.029 Plasma Membrane transporter
PPP2R2B protein phosphatase 2, regulatory subunit B, beta −2.029 Cytoplasm phosphatase
PPP2R5A protein phosphatase 2, regulatory subunit B’, alpha −2.029 Cytoplasm phosphatase
SFRP2 secreted frizzled-related protein 2 −2.029 Plasma Membrane transmembrane receptor
SOX7 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 7 −2.029 Nucleus transcription regulator
SOX14 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 14 −2.029 Nucleus transcription regulator
TCF7L2 transcription factor 7-like 2 (T-cell specific, HMG-box) −2.029 Nucleus transcription regulator
TLE3 transducin-like enhancer of split 3 −2.029 Nucleus other
WNT7B wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 7B −2.029 Extracellular Space other
WNT8B wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 8B −2.029 Extracellular Space other

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Predicted interactions between molecules with altered methylation that mapped to the EMT and Wnt/β-catenin pathways. IPA predicted direct interaction of the genes with altered methylation patterns in the EMT and Wnt/β-catenin pathways based on the publication database. Red, increased methylation; green, decreased methylation

Discussion

Global hypomethylation and hypermethylation of CpG islands in tumor suppressor genes occurs in human colon cancer cell lines and primary colon adenomatous tissues [12]. However, the global genomic distribution of aberrant methylation and the association of these methylation signatures with pivotal signaling pathways and biological networks in colon cancer remain unclear, mainly due to the limitations of the existing techniques for analyzing DNA methylation at specific sequences [22]. Recently, the development of the MeDIP-based approach has enabled the rapid and comprehensive identification of multiple CpG sites. MeDIP in conjunction with high-throughput sequence (MeDIP-seq) provides a genome-wide mapping technique that has been successfully used to profile the global DNA methylation patterns of many cancer models [2326]. Notably, Grimm et al. used MeDIP-seq to identify a large number of DMRs with distinct methylation patterns in Apc mutant adenomas, which are partially conserved between intestinal adenomas in Apcmin/+ mice and human colon cancer [27]. In the present study, we used pathway analysis after MeDIP-seq to screen the global genomic methylation profile to identify genomic loci with aberrant methylation patterns in adenomatous polyps from Apcmin/+ mice and to determine the biological function, networks, and canonical pathways that were affected by the DNA methylation in Apc mutant adenomas.

The top-ranked genes with increased and decreased methylation may provide information to facilitate the discovery of key genes, therapeutic targets, and biomarkers for the development, diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention of colon cancer. For example, CTNNBL1 [catenin (cadherin-associated protein) b-like 1] exhibited increased methylation in adenomatous polyp tissue (log2 fold change = 4.1, Table 1), as evidenced by MeDIP-seq. The CTNNBL1 gene is associated with obesity, a known risk factor for the development of CRC [28]. Recently, CTNNBL1 was reported to be a putative regulator of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, and mutations in and dysregulation of this pathway are involved in CRC [29]. However, the potential epigenetic regulation of CTNNBL1 in colon cancer remains to be elucidated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to suggest that CTNNBL1 might by aberrantly methylated in Apc mutant mice. Further experiments are necessary to investigate the epigenetic regulation of CTNNBL1 in colon cancer cells and patient specimens. CDKN1A (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A, p21) showed increased methylation (log2 fold change = 3.6, Table 1) in adenomatous polyp tissue compared with control tissue. CDKN1A is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that plays a key role in regulating the cell cycle, especially the G1/S checkpoint, and its expression is lost in most cases of colon cancer. By analyzing 737 CRC samples, Ogino et al. concluded that the down-regulation of p21 inversely correlates with microsatellite instability and the CpG island methylator phenotype in colon cancer [30]. Here, we provided additional evidence by demonstrating potentially increased p21 methylation in Apcmin/+ polyps.

It is commonly believed that promoter hypermethylation is associated with silencing of tumor suppressor genes in carcinogenesis [31]. One study observed a significant increase in DNA methylation in primary colon adenocarcinoma samples relative to normal colon tissue by analyzing the DNA methylation data from Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and found an inverse correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression: genes with cancer-specific DNA methylation showed decreased transcription activity in colon adenocarcinoma [32]. However, Grimm et al. reported that the correlation of gene expression and DNA methylation applies only to a small set of genes by analyzing the results from MeDIP-seq and RNA-seq in normal intestine tissues and Apc mutant adenomas. In addition, they analyzed the mRNA expression of 31 selected tumor suppressors, only 2 were found both promoter hypermethylated and transcriptionally silenced. Surprisingly, the majority of tumor suppressors examined in their study did not exhibit a decreased transcriptional activity in adenoma compared to normal intestine samples [27]. These results suggested that silencing of tumor suppressor genes by aberrant methylation may not be common events during early polyposis of Apc mutant mice. Nevertheless, it is possible that epigenetic changes mediated gene silencing arises during progression of adenoma to carcinoma [33]. Furthermore, it was reported that instead of directly intervene active promoters, DNA methylation affects genes that are already silent by other mechanisms such as histone modifications [34]. Thus, further studies are needed to elucidate the dynamic changes of DNA methylation, histone modifications, and gene transcription in different stages, such as initiation, progression, and metastasis during colon carcinogenesis.

This study aimed to discover functions and pathways associated with epigenomic alterations in colon cancer in addition to the individual affected molecules. We utilized IPA to interpret the MeDIP-seq data in the context of molecular interactions, networks, and canonical pathways. IPA revealed that the genes with altered methylation patterns in adenomatous tissues predominantly occupied the cancer and cell cycle networks (Table 3) and the cancer and gastrointestinal disease functional categories (Fig. 2). This information suggested that dynamic epigenetic modifications might occur in genes associated with cancer, cell cycle regulation, and gut disease development in Apcmin/+ mice.

Biological changes that lead to the switch from an epithelial to a mesenchymal cell phenotype, defined as EMT, play an important role in embryonic development and carcinogenesis [35]. In the context of tumorigenesis-associated EMT, neoplastic cells lose epithelial characteristics, such as cell-cell adhesion, cell polarity, and lack of motility, and acquire mesenchymal features, such as migratory ability, invasiveness, plasticity, and resistance to apoptosis [21]. The morphological alterations that occur during EMT enable neoplastic cells to escape from the basement membrane, migrate to neighboring lymph nodes, and eventually enter the circulation to establish secondary colonies at distant sites [36]. Thus, EMT program activation is considered a critical step in tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis [37]. Chen et al. reported elevated expression of the mesenchymal marker vimentin in intestinal adenomas from Apcmin/+ mice and suggested that molecular alterations in the initial steps of EMT are involved in early tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice; the early stages of intestinal tumorigenesis lack signs of invasion and metastasis [38]. These interesting observations highlighted the necessity to study the EMT process during early tumorigenesis. Although the molecular and biochemical mechanisms involved in the initiation and regulation of EMT in carcinogenesis are not yet fully understood, they appear to be associated with growth factor receptors (for example, RTKs), signaling pathways (for example, the Wnt/β-catenin, NOTCH, and TGF-β pathways), and stimuli (for example, oxidative stress) [39]. The involvement of epigenetic events in regulating the EMT proteome during carcinogenesis was recently demonstrated [40]. Using ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing) assays, Cieslik et al. showed that EMT is driven by the chromatin-mediated activation of transcription factors [41]. The current study identified many genes with increased or decreased methylation in the EMT pathway (Fig. 3, Tables 4 and 5), suggesting that aberrant DNA methylation may be associated with the activation of EMT during tissue remodeling in early tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice. The present study also provided useful information regarding important molecules in the EMT pathway that undergo alterations in their methylation pattern during polyposis in Apcmin/+ mice. For example, SMAD3 (mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3), a molecule that plays an essential role in TGF-β pathway-mediated EMT, was one of the genes that exhibited increased methylation (log2 fold change = 3.9, Table 4) in adenomas in Apcmin/+ mice. Interestingly, SMAD3 deficiency promotes tumor formation in the distal colon of Apcmin/+ mice [42]. EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), another important molecule that exhibited increased methylation, has been implicated in EMT in adenomas (log2 fold change = 2.9, Table 4). EGFR can induce EMT in cancer cells by up-regulating Twist [43], and promoter methylation of EGFR has been detected in metastatic tumors from patients with CRC [44]. The results of the current study indicated that aberrant methylation of EGFR may occur during early tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice. Important transcription factors in the EMT pathway, including ZEB 1 and TWIST 2, also exhibited increased methylation in adenomas from Apcmin/+ mice (Table 4). Although the contribution of TWIST 2 to promoting EMT in breast cancer progression was recently reported [45], there is limited knowledge of the role of TWIST 2 in colon cancer; however, one study proposed that TWIST 2 is a potential prognostic biomarker for colon cancer [46]. Notably, aberrant methylation of TWIST 2 has been demonstrated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia [47] and acute lymphoblastic leukemia [48]. The present study is the first to suggest that methylation of the TWIST 2 gene may be involved in tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the role of DNA methylation in EMT pathway regulation in early tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice.

Apcmin/+ mice are thought to have a hyperactive Wnt/β-catenin pathway [10], but the epigenetic modifications of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway are still not fully understood. IPA identified the Wnt/β-catenin pathway as one of the most significant canonical pathways that contained genes with increased or decreased methylation, suggesting an important role for epigenetic alterations in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in tumorigenesis. Some of the molecules with increased or decreased methylation patterns that were mapped to this pathway in the present study are consistent with the findings of previous publications. For example, Dhir et al. analyzed tissue samples from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colon cancer patients and demonstrated that aberrant methylation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling genes is an early event in IBD-associated colon cancer. Aberrant methylation of APC2 (adenomatousis polyposis coli 2), SFRP1 (secreted frizzled-related protein 1), and SFRP2 (secreted frizzled-related protein 2) is associated with the progression from colitis to neoplasia [49]. In the current study, we observed increased methylation of APC2 and decreased methylation of SFRP2 in adenomas in Apcmin/+ mice (Tables 6 and 7). Wang et al. demonstrated that black raspberries can prevent colonic ulceration in a DSS-induced model and in interleukin-10 knockout mice by epigenetically modifying genes with hypermethylated promoters in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, such as DKK3 (dickkopf-related protein 3), APC, SFRP1, and SOX17 [SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 17] [50, 51]. In the present study, DKK3 consistently displayed increased methylation (log2 fold change = 2.9, Table 6) in adenomas from Apcmin/+ mice compared with normal tissue. Furthermore, we provided additional information regarding the genes with altered methylation in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in polyps from Apcmin/+ mice, potentially facilitating future research on the involvement of aberrantly methylated Wnt/β-catenin pathway components in colon cancer development and on potential targets for epigenetic modification for the prevention of colon cancer. Intestinal adenoma in mouse originated from intestinal stem cells (ISC), a small fraction of cells in proliferative crypts [52]. Interestingly, Grimm and co-workers demonstrated that the adenoma-specific methylation signatures are not acquired from ISC by showing that the methylation patterns were similar in ISC, proliferative crypt cells, and differentiated villus cells, but are distinct in adenoma tissue [27]. Since ISC are responsive to Wnt signaling and we identified Wnt/β-catenin pathway as one of the most significant pathways associated with DNA methylation in polyps from Apcmin/+ mice, it would be important to understand the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of aberrant DNA methylation patterns in Wnt/β-catenin pathway in adenoma and how the hypermethylated genes involved in Wnt/β-catenin pathway influence the neoplastic transformation from ISC to adenoma. Furthermore, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is intimately associated with EMT pathway [53]. The present study provided valuable information regarding the potential crosstalk between the EMT and Wnt/β-catenin pathways, which are both affected by DNA methylation in Apcmin/+ mice (Fig. 5). Further studies are needed to understand the role of the complex crosstalk between multiple signaling pathways in the progression of colon cancer.

In addition to DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNA are major epigenetic mechanisms that regulate gene transcription in carcinogenesis [54]. It is currently accepted that these epigenetic modifications are linked to one another in the modulation of the epigenome landscape [55, 56]. For example, these epigenetic modifications may work in combination in carcinogenesis [57]. It was found that DNA hypermethylation in Apc mutant adenomas preferentially target the polycomb repressive complex 1/2 (PRC 1/2) target genes, suggesting an interplay of DNA methylation and histone modification in Apcmin/+ mice [27]. On the other hand, different epigenetic mechanisms may cross-regulate each other in the regulation of cellular activity. For instance, the expression of certain microRNAs is potentially controlled by DNA methylation or histone modification. However, some microRNAs can target epigenetic-modifying enzymes, such as DNMTs (DNA methyltransferases) and EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) [58]. Furthermore, Tahara, et al. found that 74 chromatin regulatory genes are mutated more frequently in CpG island methylator phenotype - high CRC in the TCGA dataset [59]. Changes in the methylation patterns of several genes encoding microRNAs, histone modification enzymes, and proteins that function in chromatin remodeling were identified using MeDIP-seq. For example, we discovered decreased methylation of microRNA-155 (log2 fold change = −2.7, Table 5), which mapped to the EMT pathway; microRNA-155 expression promotes the migration and invasion of several CRC cell lines [60]. Moreover, HDAC1 (histone deacetylase 1) was mapped to the Wnt/β-catenin pathway with a 2.9-fold (log2) increase in methylation in Apc mutant polyps (Table 6). In addition, we observed an increased methylation in the gene coding for chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 1 (CHD1) in Apc mutant polyps (data not shown). CHD1 protein is known to be involved in transcription-related chromatin remodeling [61]. Taken together, our data indicated that epigenetic alterations may be complex and may occur at multiple levels during tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice.

Conclusions

In conclusion, polyps from Apcmin/+ mice exhibited extensive, aberrant DNA methylation. The methylation changes in the genes detected using the MeDIP-seq assay were mainly attributed to functions and networks in cancer, the cell cycle, and gastrointestinal diseases. These differentially methylated genes were situated in several canonical pathways that are important in colon cancer, such as the EMT and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways.

Materials and methods

Mouse strains

C57BL/6 J male mice that are heterozygous for the Apc allele (Apcmin/+) and their wild type littermates (Apc+/+) were originally obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). The animals were housed in the Animal Care Facility at Rutgers University with a 12 h-light/12 h-dark cycle and were provided ad libitum access to food and water. The Apcmin/+ and control mice were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation at 20 weeks of age. Polyp and intestine samples were collected as previously described [62]. Briefly, after sacrificing the mice, the gastrointestinal tract was removed, opened longitudinally, and rinsed thoroughly with saline. Intestinal adenomatous polyps were excised from the intestines carefully. The normal intestine tissue and polyps were snap frozen and stored at −80 °C for future use.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was isolated from adenomatous polyps from three Apcmin/+ mice and from normal intestinal tissue from three Apc+/+ littermates using a DNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Prior to fragmentation by Covaris (Covaris, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA), the quality of the extracted genomic DNA was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis and OD ratio. After fragmentation, the genomic DNA was further assessed for size distribution using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The fragmented genomic DNA concentrations were measured with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer.

MeDIP-seq

MeDIP was performed using a MagMedIP kit (Diagenode, Denville, NJ, USA) as previously described [63]. Briefly, immunoprecipitations were performed using a monoclonal antibody against 5-methylcytidine (Diagenode, Denville, NJ, USA) to separate the methylated DNA fragments from the unmethylated fragments. The captured DNA was used to create the Illumina libraries using NEBNext reagents (catalog# E6040; New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). After the quality of the libraries was evaluated, the samples were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 machine. The results were analyzed for data quality and exon coverage using the platform provided by DNAnexus (DNAnexus, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). Subsequently, the samples were subjected to Illumina next-generation sequencing (Otogenetics Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA). After downloading the BAM files for analysis, MeDIP alignments were compared with control samples using Cuffdiff 2.0.2 as previously described [64, 63]. To judge the quantitative enrichment in MeDIP samples versus control samples in Cuffdiff, the overlapping regions of sequence alignment common to the MeDIP and control samples were used. Significant peaks at a 5 % false discovery rate (FDR) with a minimum of a 4-fold difference in R (Cummerbund package) were selected. The peaks were matched with adjacent annotated genes using ChIPpeakAnno as previously described [65].

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)

To investigate the significance of the altered methylation observed by MeDIP-seq, we analyzed genes that exhibited greater than a 2-fold change (log2) in methylation (Apcmin/+ polyps vs. control) using IPA (IPA 4.0, Ingenuity Systems, www.ingenuity.com). IPA utilized gene symbols that were identified as neighboring enriched methylation peaks by ChIPpeakAnno for all of the analyses. IPA mapped the input genes to its knowledge bases and identified the most relevant biological functions, networks, and canonical pathways related to the altered methylation profiles in the Apc mutant polyps.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of Dr. Tony Kong’s laboratory for their helpful discussions. This work was supported by R01AT007065 from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicines (NCCAM) and the Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS).

Footnotes

Yue Guo and Jong Hun Lee contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

YG, JHL, LS, and YH conceived the research design, carried out the experiments, and analyzed the data. YG, JHL, LS, WL, CZ, AYY, SB, and ANTK wrote, reviewed, and revised this manuscript. AP participated in the design of the study and performed the experiments. RH, MV, and ANTK provided administrative, technical, and material support. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Yue Guo, Email: yue.guo166@rutgers.edu.

Jong Hun Lee, Email: foodguy@cha.ac.kr.

Limin Shu, Email: lmnshu@gmail.com.

Ying Huang, Email: huangyingms@gmail.com.

Wenji Li, Email: wl365@scarletmail.rutgers.edu.

Chengyue Zhang, Email: cz141@scarletmail.rutgers.edu.

Anne Yuqing Yang, Email: yy217@rutgers.edu.

Sarandeep SS Boyanapalli, Email: sboyana@rutgers.edu.

Ansu Perekatt, Email: aperekatt@gmail.com.

Ronald P Hart, Email: rhart@rutgers.edu.

Michael Verzi, Email: verzi@dls.rutgers.edu.

Ah-Ng Tony Kong, Email: kongt@pharmacy.rutgers.edu.

References

  • 1.Berdasco M, Esteller M. Aberrant epigenetic landscape in cancer: how cellular identity goes awry. Dev Cell. 2010;19(5):698–711. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dawson MA, Kouzarides T. Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy. Cell. 2012;150(1):12–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jones PA, Takai D. The role of DNA methylation in mammalian epigenetics. Science. 2001;293(5532):1068–70. doi: 10.1126/science.1063852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jones PA, Baylin SB. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell. 2007;128(4):683–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Herman JG, Baylin SB. Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(21):2042–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra023075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert M, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(9):525–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198809013190901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guo Y, Su Z-Y, Kong A-NT. Current perspectives on epigenetic modifications by dietary chemopreventive and herbal phytochemicals. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2015;1–13. doi:10.1007/s40495-015-0023-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Harrison S, Benziger H. The molecular biology of colorectal carcinoma and its implications: a review. Surgeon. 2011;9(4):200–10. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2011.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 1996;87(2):159–70. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morin PJ, Sparks AB, Korinek V, Barker N, Clevers H, Vogelstein B, et al. Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC. Science. 1997;275(5307):1787–90. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5307.1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tetsu O, McCormick F. Beta-catenin regulates expression of cyclin D1 in colon carcinoma cells. Nature. 1999;398(6726):422–6. doi: 10.1038/18884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pancione M, Remo A, Colantuoni V. Genetic and epigenetic events generate multiple pathways in colorectal cancer progression. Pathol Res Int. 2012;2012:509348. doi: 10.1155/2012/509348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shima K, Nosho K, Baba Y, Cantor M, Meyerhardt JA, Giovannucci EL, et al. Prognostic significance of CDKN2A (p16) promoter methylation and loss of expression in 902 colorectal cancers: cohort study and literature review. Int J Cancer J Int du Cancer. 2011;128(5):1080–94. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Belshaw NJ, Pal N, Tapp HS, Dainty JR, Lewis MP, Williams MR, et al. Patterns of DNA methylation in individual colonic crypts reveal aging and cancer-related field defects in the morphologically normal mucosa. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(6):1158–63. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ying J, Poon FF, Yu J, Geng H, Wong AH, Qiu GH, et al. DLEC1 is a functional 3p22.3 tumour suppressor silenced by promoter CpG methylation in colon and gastric cancers. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(4):663–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guo Y, Shu L, Zhang C, Su ZY, Kong AN. Curcumin inhibits anchorage-independent growth of HT29 human colon cancer cells by targeting epigenetic restoration of the tumor suppressor gene DLEC1. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;94(2):69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hibi K, Mizukami H, Shirahata A, Goto T, Sakata M, Saito M, et al. Aberrant methylation of the UNC5C gene is frequently detected in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(1):271–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li X, Lu P, Li B, Zhang W, Luo K. Effects of iodine-125 seeds on the methylation of SFRP and P16 in colorectal cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2013;6(5):1225–8. doi: 10.3892/etm.2013.1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Halberg RB, Katzung DS, Hoff PD, Moser AR, Cole CE, Lubet RA, et al. Tumorigenesis in the multiple intestinal neoplasia mouse: redundancy of negative regulators and specificity of modifiers. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(7):3461–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61(5):759–67. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Polyak K, Weinberg RA. Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(4):265–73. doi: 10.1038/nrc2620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Esteller M. Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8(4):286–98. doi: 10.1038/nrg2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Down TA, Rakyan VK, Turner DJ, Flicek P, Li H, Kulesha E, et al. A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(7):779–85. doi: 10.1038/nbt1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alisch RS, Wang T, Chopra P, Visootsak J, Conneely KN, Warren ST. Genome-wide analysis validates aberrant methylation in fragile X syndrome is specific to the FMR1 locus. BMC Med Genet. 2013;14:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-14-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fang WJ, Zheng Y, Wu LM, Ke QH, Shen H, Yuan Y, et al. Genome-wide analysis of aberrant DNA methylation for identification of potential biomarkers in colorectal cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev: APJCP. 2012;13(5):1917–21. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.5.1917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ruike Y, Imanaka Y, Sato F, Shimizu K, Tsujimoto G. Genome-wide analysis of aberrant methylation in human breast cancer cells using methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation combined with high-throughput sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grimm C, Chavez L, Vilardell M, Farrall AL, Tierling S, Bohm JW, et al. DNA-methylome analysis of mouse intestinal adenoma identifies a tumour-specific signature that is partly conserved in human colon cancer. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(2):e1003250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tan LJ, Zhu H, He H, Wu KH, Li J, Chen XD, et al. Replication of 6 obesity genes in a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies from diverse ancestries. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huhn S, Ingelfinger D, Bermejo JL, Bevier M, Pardini B, Naccarati A, et al. Polymorphisms in CTNNBL1 in relation to colorectal cancer with evolutionary implications. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2011;2(1):36–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, Ogawa A, Dorfman I, Loda M, et al. Down-regulation of p21 (CDKN1A/CIP1) is inversely associated with microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2006;210(2):147–54. doi: 10.1002/path.2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baylin SB. DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005;2(Suppl 1):S4–11. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.De Carvalho DD, Sharma S, You JS, Su SF, Taberlay PC, Kelly TK, et al. DNA methylation screening identifies driver epigenetic events of cancer cell survival. Cancer Cell. 2012;21(5):655–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bardhan K, Liu K. Epigenetics and colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Cancers (Basel) 2013;5(2):676–713. doi: 10.3390/cancers5020676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002;16(1):6–21. doi: 10.1101/gad.947102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(6):1420–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI39104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kang Y, Massague J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: twist in development and metastasis. Cell. 2004;118(3):277–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thiery JP. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(6):442–54. doi: 10.1038/nrc822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen X, Halberg RB, Burch RP, Dove WF. Intestinal adenomagenesis involves core molecular signatures of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Mol Histol. 2008;39(3):283–94. doi: 10.1007/s10735-008-9164-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee K, Nelson CM. New insights into the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tissue fibrosis. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2012;294:171–221. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394305-7.00004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kiesslich T, Pichler M, Neureiter D. Epigenetic control of epithelial-mesenchymal-transition in human cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1(1):3–11. doi: 10.3892/mco.2012.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cieslik M, Hoang SA, Baranova N, Chodaparambil S, Kumar M, Allison DF, et al. Epigenetic coordination of signaling pathways during the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2013;6(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-6-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sodir NM, Chen X, Park R, Nickel AE, Conti PS, Moats R, et al. Smad3 deficiency promotes tumorigenesis in the distal colon of ApcMin/+ mice. Cancer Res. 2006;66(17):8430–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lo HW, Hsu SC, Xia W, Cao X, Shih JY, Wei Y, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer cells via up-regulation of TWIST gene expression. Cancer Res. 2007;67(19):9066–76. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Scartozzi M, Bearzi I, Mandolesi A, Giampieri R, Faloppi L, Galizia E, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene promoter methylation and cetuximab treatment in colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(11):1786–90. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fang X, Cai Y, Liu J, Wang Z, Wu Q, Zhang Z, et al. Twist2 contributes to breast cancer progression by promoting an epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem-like cell self-renewal. Oncogene. 2011;30(47):4707–20. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yu H, Jin GZ, Liu K, Dong H, Yu H, Duan JC, et al. Twist2 is a valuable prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2013;19(15):2404–11. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i15.2404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Raval A, Lucas DM, Matkovic JJ, Bennett KL, Liyanarachchi S, Young DC, et al. TWIST2 demonstrates differential methylation in immunoglobulin variable heavy chain mutated and unmutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2005;23(17):3877–85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Thathia SH, Ferguson S, Gautrey HE, van Otterdijk SD, Hili M, Rand V, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of TWIST2 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia modulates proliferation, cell survival and chemosensitivity. Haematologica. 2012;97(3):371–8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.049593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dhir M, Montgomery EA, Glockner SC, Schuebel KE, Hooker CM, Herman JG, et al. Epigenetic regulation of WNT signaling pathway genes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) associated neoplasia. J Gastrointestinal Surg Off J Soc Surg Alimentary Tract. 2008;12(10):1745–53. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0633-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang LS, Kuo CT, Huang TH, Yearsley M, Oshima K, Stoner GD, et al. Black raspberries protectively regulate methylation of Wnt pathway genes in precancerous colon tissue. Cancer Prev Res. 2013;6(12):1317–27. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang LS, Kuo CT, Stoner K, Yearsley M, Oshima K, Yu J, et al. Dietary black raspberries modulate DNA methylation in dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(12):2842–50. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Barker N, Ridgway RA, van Es JH, van de Wetering M, Begthel H, van den Born M, et al. Crypt stem cells as the cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. Nature. 2009;457(7229):608–11. doi: 10.1038/nature07602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Clevers H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell. 2006;127(3):469–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(1):27–36. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Miao CG, Yang YY, He X, Xu T, Huang C, Huang Y, et al. New advances of microRNAs in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, with a focus on the crosstalk between DNA methylation and the microRNA machinery. Cell Signal. 2013;25(5):1118–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cedar H, Bergman Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(5):295–304. doi: 10.1038/nrg2540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kondo Y. Epigenetic cross-talk between DNA methylation and histone modifications in human cancers. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(4):455–63. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.4.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fabbri M, Garzon R, Cimmino A, Liu Z, Zanesi N, Callegari E, et al. MicroRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(40):15805–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707628104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tahara T, Yamamoto E, Madireddi P, Suzuki H, Maruyama R, Chung W, et al. Colorectal carcinomas with CpG island methylator phenotype 1 frequently contain mutations in chromatin regulators. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(2):530–38 e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhang GJ, Xiao HX, Tian HP, Liu ZL, Xia SS, Zhou T. Upregulation of microRNA-155 promotes the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells through the regulation of claudin-1 expression. Int J Mol Med. 2013;31(6):1375–80. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sims RJ, 3rd, Millhouse S, Chen CF, Lewis BA, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, et al. Recognition of trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 facilitates the recruitment of transcription postinitiation factors and pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2007;28(4):665–76. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Khor TO, Cheung WK, Prawan A, Reddy BS, Kong AN. Chemoprevention of familial adenomatous polyposis in Apc(Min/+) mice by phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) Mol Carcinog. 2008;47(5):321–5. doi: 10.1002/mc.20390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yang AY, Lee JH, Shu L, Zhang C, Su ZY, Lu Y, et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in UVB- and DMBA/TPA-induced mouse skin cancer models. Life Sci. 2014;113(1-2):45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2014.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with tophat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–78. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhu LJ, Gazin C, Lawson ND, Pages H, Lin SM, Lapointe DS, et al. ChIPpeakAnno: a Bioconductor package to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data. BMC Bioinf. 2010;11:237. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell & Bioscience are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES