Abstract
Objective:
To evaluate the influence of polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair (NER) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathways on the development of osteosarcoma patients.
Methods:
Genotypes of ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986, ERCC2 rs1799793 and rs13181, NBN rs709816 and rs1805794, RAD51 rs1801320, rs1801321 and rs12593359, and XRCC3 rs861539 were conducted by Polymerase Chain Reaction Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay.
Results:
Total 148 osteosarcoma patients and 296 control subjects were collected from Taizhou First People’s Hospital. Conditional logistic regression analyses found that individuals carrying with GA+AA genotype of ERCC2 rs1799793 and GC+CC genotype of NBN rs1805794 were significantly associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma, and the ORs(95%CI) were 1.58(1.03-2.41) and 2.66(1.73-4.08), respectively. We found that GA+AA genotype of ERCC2 rs1799793 or GC+CC genotype of NBN rs1805794 were associated with an increased risk of osteosarcoma in females, with ORs(95%CI) of 2.42(1.20-4.87) and 2.01(1.07-4.23), respectively.
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that ERCC2 rs1799793 and NBN rs1805794 polymorphisms were associated with an increased risk for osteosarcoma, which suggests that NER and HRR pathways modulate the risk of developing osteosarcoma.
KEY WORDS: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, Osteosarcoma, Nucleotide excision repair, Homologous recombination repair
INTRODUCTION
Osteosarcoma is a rare bone cancer that has a first peak of incidence in adolescents around 16 years, and a second peak in patients older than 60 years.1 Osteosarcoma is a kind of disease which caused by complex, multistep, and multifactorial process.2 Previous studies have investigated the cancer stem cells and their potential to cause tumors, and genetic factors play an important role in the development of osteosarcoma, and several studies showed that DNA repaired genes are involved in the pathogenesis of this cancer.3,4
Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may lead to amino acid substitution and cause differential capacity to repair DNA damage. The genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes have been found to be associated with increased genetic instability and carcinogenesis.5 In mammalian cells, there were four different DNA repair mechanisms, including nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination repair (HRR), double-strand break repair (DSBR) and mismatch repair.6,7 All these DNA repair pathways are finely regulated for the maintenance of genomic integrity and modulation of repair capacity in response to DNA damage and thus susceptibility to cancer risk.
Excision repair cross-complementation group 2 (ERCC2) gene and excision repair cross complementation group 1 (ERCC1) are parts of an endonuclease complex. More complex DNA damage requires different mechanisms such as HRR for successful repair. In HRR, nibrin (NBN) is part of the complex involved in recognition of DNA damage, while RAD51 recombinase (RAD51) catalyses homologous search and strand invasion with the help of other proteins, including X-ray complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 3 (XRCC3).8,9
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of NER genes have already been associated with development of different cancer types,3,4,10-15 including osteosarcoma,14,15 but all results are not concordant. On the other hand, only a few studies have investigated the influence of HRR SNPs on the development of osteosarcoma.3,4 The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of polymorphisms in NER and HRR pathways on the development of osteosarcoma patients.
METHODS
Patients
Between January 2012 and January 2014, 148 osteosarcoma patients were diagnosed from Taizhou First People’s Hospital. Osteosarcoma patients were newly diagnosed and histopathologically confirmed independently by two gynecologic pathologists. 296 control subjects were collected from health check center of Taizhou First People’s Hospital, who came to our hospital for medical check up. All the control subjects were confirmed not suffering from osteosarcoma, and had no medical history of any tumor or cancer and no family history of osteosarcoma or other cancers in first-degree relatives. The control subjects were matched to cases by sex and age, and two cases were matched to one case. The study was approved by the Taizhou First People’s Hospital.
Controls were investigated to obtain demographic parameters. For the cases, clinical and pathological information were extracted from the medical records, including tumor stage and location, histological type, and family history of cancer.
Blood samples and genotyping
5ml peripheral blood was collected from each patient and was kept in -70ºC until use. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood using the TIANamp Blood DNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genotypes of ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986, ERCC2 rs1799793 and rs13181, NBN rs709816 and rs1805794, RAD51 rs1801320, rs1801321 and rs12593359, and XRCC3 rs861539 were conducted by Polymerase Chain Reaction Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay. Probes and primers for ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986, ERCC2 rs1799793 and rs13181, NBN rs709816 and rs1063054, RAD51 rs1801320, rs1801321 and rs12593359, and XRCC3 rs861539 were designed using Primer 5.0 software (PREMIER Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA). The cycling programme of PCR reaction condition was performed as follows: one initial denaturation step at 5 minutes at 94ºC, followed by 35 denaturation cycles of 45s at 94ºC, 60s of annealing at 62ºC, and 60s of extension at 72ºC, and followed by a final extension at 72ºC for 10 minutes. In order to perform quality control, genotyping was repeated in 20% samples to check for genotyping accuracy.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± SD and analyzed by student t test. Categorical variables were shown as N(%) and analyzed by χ2-test. The χ2-test was performed to verify whether the genotype distributions were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibriums of ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986, ERCC2 rs1799793 and rs13181, NBN rs709816 and rs1805794, RAD51 rs1801320, rs1801321 and rs12593359, and XRCC3 rs861539. The association between osteosarcoma group and control group were assessed using unconditional logistic regression, and the results were expressed using odds ratio (OR) and their confidence intervals (CI). All P-values were two sided, and a P-value was regarded as statistically significant when it less than 0.05.
RESULTS
The characteristics of patients with osteosarcoma and controls are shown in Table-I. We did not find significant difference between cases and controls for the frequency-matched variables gender and age at interview (P>0.05). The mean ages of patients with osteosarcoma and controls were 17.7±8.2 and 19.2±5.3 years, respectively. There was no significant difference between cases and controls in terms of family history of cancer (P>0.05). For the stage of osteosarcoma, 106 (71.62%) were at stage of I-II, and 42(28.38%) were at stage of III. For the tumor location of these cases, 107(72.30%) were extremities, and 41(27.70%) located at other places.
Table-I.
Characteristics of patients with osteosarcoma and controls.
| Characteristics | Cases | % | Controls | % | OR(95%CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 91 | 61.49 | 181 | 61.15 | 1.0(Ref.) | |
| Female | 57 | 38.51 | 115 | 38.85 | 0.98(0.64-1.51) | 0.95 |
| Mean age, years | 17.7±8.2 | 19.2±5.3 | ||||
| <20 | 87 | 58.78 | 164 | 55.41 | 1.0(Ref.) | |
| ≥20 | 61 | 41.22 | 132 | 44.59 | 0.87(0.57-1.32) | 0.5 |
| Family history of cancer | ||||||
| Positive | 35 | 23.65 | 63 | 21.28 | 1.0(Ref.) | |
| Negative | 113 | 76.35 | 233 | 78.72 | 0.87(0.53-1.44) | 0.57 |
| Stage | ||||||
| I-II | 106 | 71.62 | ||||
| III | 42 | 28.38 | ||||
| Histological type | ||||||
| Osteoblastic | 48 | 32.43 | ||||
| Chondroblastic | 70 | 47.3 | ||||
| Other | 30 | 20.27 | ||||
| Tumor location | ||||||
| Extremities | 107 | 72.3 | ||||
| Other | 41 | 27.7 |
By χ2-test, genotype distributions of ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986, ERCC2 rs1799793 and rs13181, NBN rs709816 and rs1805794, RAD51 rs1801320, rs1801321 and rs12593359, and XRCC3 rs861539 in the control subjects were found to be in line with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Conditional logistic regression analyses found that individuals carrying with GA+AA genotype of ERCC2 rs1799793 were significantly associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma when compared with GG genotype (OR=1.58, 95%CI=1.03-2.41). Moreover, individuals carrying GC+CC genotype of NBN rs1805794 were correlated with a heavy enhanced risk of osteosarcoma when compared with GG genotype, and the OR(95%CI) was 2.66(1.73-4.08). However, we did not find significant association between ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986, ERCC2 rs13181, NBN rs709816, RAD51 rs1801320, rs1801321 and rs12593359, and XRCC3 rs861539 and risk of osteosarcoma.
Table-II.
Genotype distribution of ten SNPs in NER and HRR pathways between cases and controls.
| Gene | Genotype | Cases | % | Controls | % | OR(95%CI)1 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERCC1 rs11615 | TT | 63 | 42.57 | 135 | 45.3 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| TC+CC | 85 | 57.43 | 163 | 54.7 | 1.12(0.74-1.70) | 0.58 | |
| ERCC1 rs3212986 | GG | 79 | 53.38 | 169 | 56.71 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| GA+AA | 69 | 46.62 | 129 | 43.29 | 1.14(0.75-1.73) | 0.5 | |
| ERCC2 rs1799793 | GG | 84 | 56.76 | 201 | 67.45 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| GA+AA | 64 | 43.24 | 97 | 32.55 | 1.58(1.03-2.41) | 0.03 | |
| ERCC2 rs13181 | AA | 86 | 58.11 | 181 | 60.74 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| AC+CC | 62 | 41.89 | 117 | 39.26 | 1.12(0.73-1.70) | 0.59 | |
| NBN rs709816 | GG | 55 | 37.16 | 115 | 38.59 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| GC+CC | 93 | 62.84 | 183 | 61.41 | 1.06(0.69-1.63) | 0.78 | |
| NBN rs1805794 | GG | 52 | 35.14 | 127 | 42.62 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| GC+CC | 96 | 64.86 | 171 | 57.38 | 2.66(1.73-4.08) | <0.001 | |
| RAD51 rs1801320 | GG | 101 | 68.24 | 213 | 71.48 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| GC+CC | 47 | 31.76 | 85 | 28.52 | 1.17(0.74-1.82) | 0.48 | |
| RAD51 rs1801321 | GG | 88 | 59.46 | 187 | 62.75 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| GT+TT | 60 | 40.54 | 111 | 37.25 | 1.15(0.75-1.75) | 0.5 | |
| RAD51 rs12593359 | TT | 49 | 33.11 | 105 | 35.23 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| TG+GG | 99 | 66.89 | 193 | 64.77 | 1.10(0.71-1.71) | 0.66 | |
| XRCC3 rs861539 | CC | 77 | 52.03 | 173 | 58.05 | 1.0(Ref.) | - |
| CT+TT | 71 | 47.97 | 125 | 41.95 | 1.28(0.84-1.93) | 0.23 |
Adjusted for sex, age and family history of cancer.
Table-III.
Stratification analysis on the association between rs699947 and rs2010963 and demographic characteristics in osteosarcoma risk.
| Variables | ERCC2 rs1799793 | OR(95%CI) | P | NBN rs1805794 | OR(95%CI) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases/Controls | Cases/Controls | |||||||
| GG | GA+AA | GA+AA vs GG | GG | GC+CC | GC+CC vs GG | |||
| Gender | ||||||||
| Male | 58/124 | 33/57 | 1.23(0.71-2.17) | 0.43 | 35/74 | 56/107 | 1.11(0.64-1.92) | 0.7 |
| Female | 26/77 | 31/38 | 2.42(1.20-4.87) | 0.007 | 17/53 | 40/62 | 2.01(1.07-4.23) | 0.04 |
| Age | ||||||||
| <20 | 53/34 | 119/45 | 1.70(0.94-3.05) | 0.06 | 31/69 | 56/95 | 1.31(0.74-2.34) | 0.32 |
| ≥20 | 31/82 | 30/50 | 1.59(0.82-3.06) | 0.14 | 21/58 | 40/74 | 1.49(0.76-2.97) | 0.21 |
| Family history of cancer | ||||||||
| Positive | 11/28 | 24/35 | 1.75(0.68-4.64) | 0.21 | 9/15 | 26/48 | 0.90(0.32-2.68) | 0.83 |
| Negative | 73/173 | 40/60 | 1.58(0.94-2.63) | 0.06 | 43/112 | 70/121 | 1.51(0.93-2.45) | 0.08 |
Moreover, we conducted stratification analysis on the association between ERCC2 rs1799793 and NBN rs1805794 and demographic characteristics in osteosarcoma patients. We found that GA+AA genotype of ERCC2 rs1799793 or GC+CC genotype of NBN rs1805794 were associated with an increased risk of osteosarcoma in females, and the ORs(95%CI) were 2.42(1.20-4.87) and 2.01(1.07-4.23), respectively.
DISCUSSION
In this hospital-based case-control study, we investigated the role of ten SNPs in NER and HRR pathways about the risk of osteosarcoma. Since there is increasing evidence that genetic variation leads to different DNA repair capacities in the human population, such common polymorphisms can play a role in an individual’s genetic susceptibility to cancer.16 Mutations in DNA repaired gene may lead to decrease or loss of its DNA repair capacity and confer the variation in susceptibility to diverse malignant tumors among individuals. Many studies have indicated that polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may modify the risk for cancer, such as esophageal cancer, breast cancer, glioma and prostate cancer,17-20 while few studies reported the role of DNA repair genes and development of osteosarcoma.21
We also found that ERCC2 rs1799793 and NBN rs1805794 may be associated with carcinogenesis of osteosarcoma. GA+AA genotype of ERCC2 rs1799793 and GC+CC genotype of NBN rs1805794 were associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma, but that gene polymorphisms of ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986, ERCC2 rs13181, NBN rs709816, RAD51 rs1801320, rs1801321 and rs12593359, and XRCC3 rs861539 were not correlated with risk of this cancer. Previous studies have showed that the non-synonymous ERCC2 rs1799793 SNP is associated with lower DNA repair capacity.22 Our results are in line with the proposed biological effect of ERCC2 rs1799793, as lower repair capacity may cause increased DNA damage and thus increase the risk of osteosarcoma. For NBN rs1805794, previous studies have showed that NBN SNPs can influence the DNA repair capacity, and NBN rs1805794 genotypes confer to differences in levels of DNA damage and osteosarcoma risk.3,4 Our study is in agreement with previous studies, GC+CC genotype of NBN rs1805794 was associated with increased risk of developing osteosarcoma.
Development of osteosarcoma was caused by different multiple factors, including genetic and environmental factors.2,14,15 Our study showed that GA+AA genotype of ERCC2 rs1799793 or GC+CC genotype of NBN rs1805794 were associated with an increased risk of osteosarcoma in females, which indicated that genetic synergistic effect between ERCC2 rs1799793 and NBN rs1805794 genetic variants and gender increases the risk of cancer. However, no previous studies have investigated the correlation between DNA repair genes and demographic factors on the risk of osteosarcoma, therefore, further studies are greatly needed to confirm our results.
There are some limitations to the present study that should be mentioned. First of all, although this study suggested that ERCC2 rs1799793 and NBN rs1805794 polymorphisms were associated with osteosarcoma risk, more biological background data are needed to explain our results. The current finding might involve gene-to-environment interactions, which were not explored in the present study. Second, the sample size of this study is relatively small, which may not have enough statistical power to explore the real association. Third, this is a hospital based case control study, so the selection bias cannot be ignored and the subjects may not be representative of the general population. Finally, these results should be interpreted with caution because the population was only from China, which reduces the possibility of confounding from ethnicity, so it does not permit extrapolation of the results to other ethnic groups.
In conclusion, our study is, to our knowledge, the first to examine prospectively an increased risk role of ten SNPs in DNA repair pathway in osteosarcoma susceptibility, and we found that ERCC2 rs1799793 and NBN rs1805794 polymorphisms modulate the risk of developing osteosarcoma. Additional studies are greatly needed to confirm this finding.
Authors’ contribution
GJJ, MW & JPY conceived, designed and did statistical analysis & editing of manuscript.
WDC, WS & WG did data collection and manuscript writing.
JPY did review and final approval of manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ritter J, Bielack SS. Osteosarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii320–25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq276. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ottaviani G, Jaffe N. The etiology of osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 2009;152:15–32. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_2. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goricar K, Erculj N, Zadel M, Dolzan V. Genetic polymorphisms in homologous recombination repair genes in healthy Slovenian population and their influence on DNA damage. Radiol Oncol. 2012;46(1):46–53. doi: 10.2478/v10019-012-0001-7. doi:10.2478/v10019-012-0001-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goričar K, Kovač V, Jazbec J, Zakotnik B, Lamovec J, Dolžan V. Influence of the folate pathway and transporter polymorphisms on methotrexate treatment outcome in osteosarcoma. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2014;24(10):514–21. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000083. doi:10.1097/FPC.0000000000000083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Boer JG. Polymorphisms in DNA repair and environmental interactions. Mutat Res. 2002;509:201–10. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00217-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yu Z, Chen J, Ford BN, Brackley ME, Glickman BW. Human DNA repair systems: an overview. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1999;33(1):3–20. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(1999)33:1<3::aid-em2>3.0.co;2-l. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1999)33: 1<3::AID-EM2>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Christmann M, Tomicic MT, Roos WP, Kaina B. Mechanisms of human DNA repair: an update. Toxicology. 2003;193:3–34. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00287-7. doi:10.1016/S0300-483X(03)00287-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Willers H, Dahm-Daphi J, Powell SN. Repair of radiation damage to DNA. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(7):1297–1301. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601729. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wessendorfa P, Vijgb J, Nussenzweigc A, Digweeda M. Deficiency of the DNA repair protein nibrin increases the basal but not the radiation induced mutation frequency in vivo. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen. 2014;769:11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.07.001. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu C, Yin Q, Hu J, Weng J, Wang Y. Quantitative assessment of the association between XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and bladder cancer risk. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(2):1203–1209. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1161-9. doi:10.1007/s13277-013-1161-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li X, Xu J, Yang X, Wu Y, Cheng B, Chen D, et al. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms of nucleotide excision repair genes with laryngeal cancer risk and interaction with cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(5):4659–4665. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1610-0. doi:10.1007/s13277-014-1610-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lu B, Li J, Gao Q, Yu W, Yang Q, Li X. Laryngeal cancer risk and common single nucleotide polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair pathway genes ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC3, ERCC4, ERCC5 and XPA. Gene. 2014;542(1):64–68. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.02.043. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2014.02.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhi LQ, Ma W, Zhang H, Zeng SX, Chen B. Association of RECQL5 gene polymorphisms and osteosarcoma in a Chinese Han population. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(4):3255–3259. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1425-4. doi:10.1007/s13277-013-1425-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.He J, Wang J, Wang D, Dai S, Yv T, Chen P, et al. Association analysis between genetic variants of MDM2 gene and osteosarcoma susceptibility in Chinese. Endocr J. 2013;60(11):1215–20. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.ej13-0260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang Z, Wen P, Luo X, Fang X, Wang Q, Ma F, et al. Association of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene single-nucleotide polymorphisms with osteosarcoma susceptibility in a Chinese population. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(4):3605–3610. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1475-7. doi:10.1007/s13277-013-1475-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Berwick M, Vineis P. Markers of DNA repair and susceptibility in humans: an epidemiological review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;91:874–897. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.11.874. doi:10.1093/jnci/92.11.874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhu ML, He J, Wang M, Sun MH, Jin L, Wang X, et al. Potentially functional polymorphisms in the ERCC2 gene and risk of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Chinese populations. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6281. doi: 10.1038/srep06281. doi:10.1038/srep06281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang T, Wang H, Guo H, Yang S, Zhu G, Guo H, et al. Polymorphisms in the DNA Repair Gene ERCC2/XPD and Breast Cancer Risk: A HapMap-Based Case-Control Study Among Han Women in a Chinese Less-Developed Area. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2014;18(10):703–10. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2014.0028. doi:10.1089/gtmb.2014.0028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huang LM, Shi X, Yan DF, Zheng M, Deng YJ, Zeng WC, et al. Association between ERCC2 polymorphisms and glioma risk: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4417–4422. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.11.4417. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.11.4417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou C, Xie LP, Lin YW, Yang K, Mao QQ, Cheng Y. Susceptibility of XPD and hOGG1 genetic variants to prostate cancer. Biomed Rep. 2013;1(4):679–683. doi: 10.3892/br.2013.123. doi:10.3892/br.2013.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhi LQ, Ma W, Zhang H, Zeng SX, Chen B. Association of RECQL5 gene polymorphisms and osteosarcoma in a Chinese Han population. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(4):3255–3259. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1425-4. doi:10.1007/s13277-013-1425-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Spitz MR, Wu X, Wang Y, Wang LE, Shete S, Amos CI, et al. Modulation of nucleotide excision repair capacity by XPD polymorphisms in lung cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2001;61(4):1354–1357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]