Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Phys. 2015 Jul 29;456:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2015.04.011

Infrared, Raman, and Ultraviolet Absorption Spectra and Theoretical Calculations and Structure of 2,3,5,6-Tetrafluoropyridine in its Ground and Excited Electronic States

Hong-Li Sheu 1, Praveenkumar Boopalachandran 1, Sunghwan Kim 2, Jaan Laane 1,*
PMCID: PMC4476468  NIHMSID: NIHMS694131  PMID: 26113767

Abstract

Infrared and Raman spectra of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine (TFPy) were recorded and vibrational frequencies were assigned for its S0 electronic ground states. Ab initio and density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to complement the experimental work. The lowest electronic excited state of this molecule was investigated with ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy and theoretical CASSCF calculations. The band origin was found to be at 35,704.6 cm−1 in the ultraviolet absorption spectrum. A slightly puckered structure with a barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1 was predicted by CASSCF calculations for the S1(π,π*) state. Lower frequencies for the out-of-plane ring bending vibrations for the electronic excited state result from the weaker bonding within the pyridine ring.

Keywords: vibrational spectra; ultraviolet absorption spectra; electronic excited state; molecular structure; 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-694131-f0001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

The vibrations of the pyridine (Py) molecule have been extensively studied in both its ground [1,2] and excited electronic states [3-5]. This molecule is rigidly planar in its ground state but becomes quasi-planar with a tiny barrier to planarity of 3 cm−1 in its S1(n,π*) electronic excited state [5]. In order to understand what effect fluorine substitution has on the structure of this ring system in electronic excited states, in recent years we have carried out ultraviolet absorption and theoretical studies of several fluoropyridines. In 2011 we reported our results on 2-fluoropyridine (2FPy) and 3-fluoropyridne (3FPy) [6] which had previously been studied under low resolution by Medhi and Medhi [7,8]. Our work showed that these molecules remain planar and fairly rigid in their excited states. In 2013 we published our results on 2,6-difluoropyridine (26DFPy) [9]. For the S1(π,π*) state of this molecule the experimental results supported a planar structure although two different theoretical computations predicted conflicting results (a planar structure from CASSCF but a non-planar structure with small barrier to planarity from TD-B3LYP). The S2(n,π*) state for 26DFPy has a calculated barrier to planarity of 256 cm−1. In the present study we report our results for 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine (TFPy) for both its ground and first excited electronic states.

graphic file with name nihms-694131-f0002.jpg

EXPERIMENTAL

2,3,5,6-Tetrafluoropyridine (99% purity) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The liquid and vapor-phase infrared spectra were obtained using a Bruker Vertex 70 Fourier-transform spectrometer equipped with a globar light source, a KBr beamsplitter and a deuterated lanthanum triglycine sulfate (DLaTGS) detector for mid-infrared. A 10 cm glass cell with KBr windows and 20 Torr of sample was used. For the far-infrared region, a Mylar beamsplitter and a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector and polyethylene windows for the gas cell were used. Measurements were done with 1024 scans at 0.5 cm−1 resolution. The liquid and vapor-phase Raman spectra were collected using a Jobin-Yvon U-1000 spectrometer equipped with a frequency-doubled Nd:YAG Coherent Verdi-10 laser and CCD detector. The laser excitation at 532 nm provided a power of 1W for liquid samples and 6W for vapor samples. The effective resolution was 0.7 cm−1. The vapor sample was sealed in a specially designed glass cell as described previously [10,11]. Parallel and perpendicular polarization measurements were made utilizing the standard accessory and scrambler. Ultraviolet absorption spectra of vapor samples were recorded with a Bomem DA8.02 Fourier transform spectrometer. The vapor sample was loaded into a 20 cm glass cell with quartz window and measurements were done by taking the average of 4000 scans at 1 cm−1 resolution.

THEORETICAL COMPUTATIONS

The molecular structure of TFPy in its S0 electronic ground state were computed using the second-order Møller-Plesset (MP2) level of theory [12] with the cc-pVTZ basis set [13]. The B3LYP [14,15] density functional with the 6-311++G(d,p) [16-18] basis set was used to compute the harmonic vibrational frequencies. A scaling factor of 0.964 was used for C-H stretching frequencies and 0.985 for frequencies below 1,800 cm−1 based on our previous work [5,6,9]. In addition, the complete active-space self-consistent field (CASSCF) method [19] were also employed to investigate the vibrational frequencies of TFPy in its S0 and S1(π,π*) state. The active space for the CASSCF computations consisted of eight electrons (two lone-pair electrons and six π electrons) distributed in seven orbitals (one lone-pair orbital on the nitrogen atom and six π orbitals). A scaling factor of 0.905 was used for all vibrational frequencies computed at the CASSCF level. All MP2 and B3LYP were carried out using the Gaussian 09 program package [20], and CASSCF computations were done using the GAMESS package [21,22].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In its S0 ground state TFPy was predicted to have a planar structure with C2v symmetry. For the S1(π,π*) excited state a puckered structure with a barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1 was predicted by CASSCF computations. The calculated structures for TFPy in its S0 ground state and S1(π,π*) excited state are shown in Figure 1. As expected, the excited state has longer bond lengths in the pyridine ring as compared to the ground state due to the decrease in π bond character. The N-C, C(2)-C(3) and C(3)-C(4) bond lengths are longer in the S1(π,π*) state by 0.033 Å, 0.037 Å, and 0.044 Å, respectively.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Calculated structures of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine (TFPy) in its electronic ground and excited states.

The liquid and vapor phase infrared and Raman spectra of TFPy are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively, and are compared with those computed with the DFT B3LYP method using the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. Good agreement between experimental and calculated frequency values was found. A few overtone bands were observed in the experimental liquid and vapor spectra, but the calculated spectrum provides only the fundamental vibrational frequencies. Both the experimental and calculated frequencies for the infrared and Raman spectra are summarized in Table 1. As indicated in the table, the v2 ring-stretching vibration is in Fermi resonance with a combination band of a C-H wag (v14) and ring twist (v15) which results in a band near 1611 cm−1 in the liquid and vapor infrared and Raman spectra. Three infrared band types (type A, type B and type C bands) were clearly observed in the infrared spectrum and examples of these are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Calculated and observed infrared spectra of TFPy.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Calculated and observed Raman spectra of TFPy .

Table 1.

Vibrational spectra (cm−1) and assignments for the electronic ground and excited states of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine.

C2v ν Approximate description Calculated
IR
Raman
S1
ν Intensityd Liquide Vaporf Liquid Vapor Cal. Obs.
A1 1 C-H stretch 3101 (0.4, 100) 3082 m 3091 w (B) 3080 (2) 3089 (4) 3072 -
2 Ring stretchc 1632 (4, 7) 1640 s 1640 w (A/B) 1640 (0.3) - 1554 -
3 Ring stretch (C-F) 1443 (7, 2) 1446 s 1450 s (B) 1445 (0.2) - 1381 1380
4 C-F stretch 1401 (0.2, 37) 1405 m 1414 w (B) 1401 (7) 1404 (7) 1361 1358
5 C-F stretch (ring) 1223 (30, 0.8) 1228 s 1233 s (B) 1226 (0.3) - 1104 1100
6 Ring breathing 746 (2, 100) 742 s 742 m (B) 742 (100) 740 (100) 690 709
7 Ring bending (in-plane) 684 (2, 5) 693 s 692 m (B) 692 (5) 690 (6) 672 689
8 Ring bending (in-plane) 505 (0.3, 42) 506 m 505 w (B) 505 (53) 503 (39) 451 453
9 C-F wag (in-plane) 355 (0.3, 0.5) 360 m 358 w (B) 359 (1) 357 (1) 347 347
10 C-F wag (in-plane) 278 (0.1, 2) 283 m 280 w (B) 282 (3) 280 sh (2) 265 280
A2 11 Ring twisting 699 (0, 0.1) - - 692 (5) - 383 373
12 C-F wag (out-of-plane) 454 (0, 17) - - 451 (25) 451 (10) 305 302b
13 C-F wag (out-of-plane) 115 (0, 0.004) - - - - 98 84
B1 14 C-H wag 897 (4, 2) 895 s 900 s (C) 900 (0.6) - 406 400
15 Ring twisting 736 (2, 4) 719 s 723 m (C) 718 (3) - 335 328
16 Ring bending (out-of-plane) 485 (0.06, 0.9) 477 w 475 w (C) 477 (0.6) - 108a 110
17 C-F wag (out-of-plane) 296 (0.2, 9) 303 m 297 w (C) 302 (10) 301 (4) 303 302b
18 C-F wag (out-of-plane) 201 (0.4, 0.1) 211 m 201 w (C) 210 (0.7) - 198a 165
B2 19 Ring stretchc 1634 (0.7, 36) 1640 s 1640 w (A/B) 1640 (0.3) - 1770 -
20 Ring stretch (C-F) 1495 (100, 4) 1483 s 1500 s (A) 1482 (0.1) - 1518 -
21 Ring stretch 1302 (9, 9) 1274 s 1270 m (A) 1274 (0.7) - 1385 -
22 C-H wag 1188 (8.4, 0.02) 1189 s 1191 m (A) 1188 (0.1) - 1151 -
23 C-F stretch (ring) 1145 (2.5, 13) 1139 m 1149 m (A) 1139 (1) 1145 (1) 1137 -
24 C-F stretch 901 (18, 0.9) 896 s 900 s (A) 900 (0.6) 894 (1) 825 809
25 C-F wag (in-plane) 656 (0.3, 7) 659 m 659 w (A) 658 (2) - 617 611
26 Ring bend (in-plane) 448 (0.007, 16) 452 w - 451 (25) 444 (9) 408 420
27 C-F wag (in-plane) 299 (0.02, 0.01) - 297 w (A) - 299 (4) 293 290
a

Coupled vibrations

b

Assigned twice

c

v2 and v19 overlap in the spectra; v2 is in Fermi resonance with v14 + v15 and this gives a band near 1611 cm−1 in the liquid and vapor infrared and Raman spectra

d

Relative intensities for IR and Raman

e

s: strong m: medium w: weak

f

A, B, and C in parentheses indicate the infrared band types.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Examples of band types in the infrared spectrum of TFPy.

The ultraviolet absorption spectrum of TFPy vapor is shown in Figure 5. The band origin which corresponds to a transition to the S1(π,π*) excited state is at 35,704.6 cm−1. A comparison of observed and calculated vibrational frequencies for the S1(π,π*) excited state is presented in Table 1. A strong coupling between the out-of-plane ring bending and out-of-plane C-F wag was observed. A listing of the observed ultraviolet bands and the assignments for the excited state vibrational transitions are shown in Table 2. Examination of Tables 1 and 2 shows that the lower frequency A1 vibrations (v6 to v10) in the electronic excited state were observed directly. For the non-totally symmetric vibrations many of the overtones were observed. For example, transition 1320 at 167 cm−1 shows v13 in the excited state to be at about 84 cm−1. As expected due to the decreased bonding character in the S1(π,π*) state, essentially all of the vibrational frequencies in the excited state have lower values than the corresponding modes in the S0 ground state.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Ultraviolet absorption spectra of TFPy relative to the band origin at 35,704.4 cm−1.

Table 2.

Ultraviolet absorption spectra (cm−1) and assignments for 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine.

Observed Peak intensitya Assignment Inferred
−784 w 8101010 −506-283 = −789
−763 w
−738 m 610 −742
−675 m
−573 w 12101310 −[115]-451 = −566
−504 mw 810 −505
−480 mw
−458 w
−438 w
−395 m 1511 328-723 = −395
−359 w 910
−297 mw
−280 ms 1010 0-280 = −280
−219 w 8101001 280-503 = −223
−211 w
−198 w
−178 m 16011701 302-475 = −173
−122 ms
−112 ms
−101 mw
−87 ms 1822 325-412 = −87
−38 m 1811 165-201 = −36
−21 s 1311 84-105 = −21
45 ms 10101820 325-280 = 45
67 ms 1010901 346-280 = 66
75 m
101 m 801910 453-357 = 96
145 m
167 ms 1302 84×2 = 168
172 m 8011010 453-280 = 173
176 m
193 m 14011810 400-201 = 199
200 m
214 ms 1602 110×2 = 220
222 w
234 w
244 m
260 s 10011311 280+84-105 = 261
275 s 16011801 110+165 = 275
280 s 1001 280-0 = 280
310 mw 25012710 611-299 = 312
325 s 1802 165×2 = 330
346 s 901 346-0 = 346
355 mw 601910 709-357 = 52
391 m
411 m 7011010 689-280 = 409
414 w 16011701 302+110 = 412
423 m
428 m 6011010 709-280 = 429
435 m 15011601 328+110 = 438
446 s
453 s 801 453-0 = 453
522 m
535 m
546 mw
556 mw
563 s 1002 280×2 = 560
14011801 400+165 = 565
580 m 2702 290×2 = 580
603 m 1202 302×2 = 604
625 s 9011001 346+280 = 626
633 m 15011701 328+302 = 630
646 m
650 mw
655 m 1502 328×2 = 656
667 mw
689 ms 701 689-0 = 689
692 m 902 346×2 = 692
709 s 601 710-0 = 710
726 ms 14011501 400+328 = 728
733 ms 8011001 453+280 = 733
746 ms 1102 373×2 = 746
754 m
768 w
779 w
788 w
799 m 1402 400×2 = 800
801901 453+346 = 799
841 m 2602 420×2 = 840
862 m
880 m
901 m 25012701 611+290 = 901
906 m 802 453×2 = 906
927 mw
949 mw
957 mw
969 m 7011001 689+280 = 969
991 s 6011001 710+280 = 990
1029 m 25012601 611+420 = 1031
1037 m 701901 689+346 = 1035
1051 m
1058 m 6011001 710+346 = 1056
1071 m
1081 m
1128 m
1143 m 701801 689+453 = 1142
1162 ms 601801 710+453 = 1163
1204 mw
1231 mw 2502 611×2 = 1222
24012601 809+420 = 1229
1247 mw
1255 mw
1274 mw
1278 m
1285 m
1293 m
1331 m
1364 m
1401 m
1422 m 602 710×2 = 1420
24012501 809+611 = 1420
1446 m 501901 1100+346 = 1446
1511 w
1619 m 2402 809×2 = 1618
1705 m 401901 1358+346 = 1704
1726 m 301901 1380+346 = 1726
1877 mw
1895 mw
1987 mw
2091 mw
2134 m
2153 m
2367 mw
2415 m
2600 w
2699 w
2796 w
2824 mw
3106 mw
a

s – strong, m – medium, w –weak, v - very

Py, 2FPy,3FPy, 26DFPy and TFPy all have planar and rigid structures in their electronic ground states. Py is extremely floppy in its S1(n,π*) excited state and its out-of-plane ring bending frequency drops from 403 cm−1 to 60 cm−1 [5]. It has a tiny barrier to planarity of 3 cm−1. Despite their planar structures, 2FPy, 3FPy, and 26DFPy all become floppier in their excited states with significant drops in their ring puckering frequencies from 414 cm−1, 412 cm−1 and 460 cm−1 to 96 cm−1, 118 cm−1 and 127 cm−1 , respectively [6,9]. A slightly puckered structure is predicted by CASSCF calculations for TFPy with a barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1. This indicates that TFPy also has a floppier structure in the excited state and this is confirmed by the lowering of out-of-plane ring bending frequency from 475 cm−1 in the electronic ground state to 110 cm−1 in the S1(π,π*) excited state. A strong coupling between the out-of-plane ring bending and the out-of-plane C-F wag motions was also observed. In fact, the out-of-plane ring bending frequency even drops below the out-of-plane C-F wag due to the increased antibonding character in the excited state.

Although the out-of-plane ring bending vibration of TFPy is coupled to the C-F out-of-plane wagging motion, we can approximate the ring-bending potential energy function for the excited S1(π,π*) state based on the experimental data and theoretical calculations. Previously we carried out a similar calculation for 26DFPy [9]. For TFPy we utilized the calculated barrier of 30 cm−1 and the observed ring-bending frequency of 110 cm−1. The resulting potential energy function in reduced coordinates [23] is shown in Figure 6. Because of the coupling of the bending with the C-F wagging, a meaningful reduced mass for the motion could not be calculated thus requiring the use of reduced coordinates. It is notable that while there is a small barrier to planarity, the lowest quantum state lies above the barrier so we describe this molecule as quasi-planar, similar to pyridine itself.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Calculated ring-bending potential energy function of TFPy in reduced coordinates. The 110 cm−1 transition was observed while the 183 cm−1 transition was calculated.

Table 3 summarizes the excited state results for pyridine and the four fluoropyridines that we have studied. All of these molecules are rigid in their ground electronic states but become less rigid in their S(n,π*) and S(π,π*) states. For the excited states the barriers to planarity, if present, are small. As seen in the table, fluorinating the pyridine ring increases the frequency of the π→π* transition and this indicates that the fluorine atom somewhat increases the πbond stabilization. However, the addition of four fluorine atoms to the pyridine ring in TFPy curiously has less of an effect than adding one or two fluorine atoms for 2FPy, 3FPy, and 26DFPy. It is also not clear why 2FPy and 3FPy remain planar in their excited states while pyridine, 26DFPy, and TFPy show more of a tendency to become non-planar.

Table 3.

Excited state barrier to planarity and puckering angles of pyridine and fluoropyridines in their excited states.

Molecules
State
Band Origin (cm−1)
Barrier (cm−1)
Puckering Anglea
Method
Reference
Py S1 (n, π*) 34,767.0 3 Quasi-planar Experiment 1
S2 (π, π*) 38,350.0 - - Experiment 15
2FPy S1 (π, π*) 38,030.4 0 Planar CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) 2
S2 (n, π*) 39,199 (Calc.) 0 Planar CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) 2
3FPy S1 (n, π*) 35,051.7 0 Planar CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) 2
S2 (π, π*) 37,339.0 0 Planar CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) 2
26DFPy S1 (π, π*) 37,820.2 124 11.2 ° / 22.7 ° TD-B3LYP / 6-311++G(d, p) 3
S1 (π, π*) 37,820.2 0 Planar CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) 3
S2 (n, π*) 42,323 (Calc.) 256 38.9 ° / 25.9 ° CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) 3
TFPy S1 (π, π*) 35,704.6 30 2.9 ° / 4.5 ° CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) This work
a

The two values for the puckering angle refer to the out-of-plane angles from the ring to the N atom and the C atom directly opposite, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TFPy has a rigid planar structure in its electronic ground state and the structure becomes floppier in the excited state with a small barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1. The infrared, Raman and ultraviolet absorption spectra were recorded and the vibrational frequencies were assigned for both ground and excited states with the aid of theoretical calculations. A potential energy function based on experimental and theoretical results was calculated.

HIGHLIGHTS.

  • * The structures of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine (TFPy) for its S0 ground and S1(π,π*) electronic excited states have been calculated.

  • * TFPy is calculated to be rigidly planar in its ground electronic state, but is quasi-planar and floppy with a barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1 in its excited state.

  • * The vibrational frequencies for both the S0 and S1(π,π*) states have been assigned and those agree well with the theoretical computations.

  • * A ring-bending potential energy function for the S1(π,π*) state was proposed based on experimental and theoretical data.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank the Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grant A-0396) for financial support. This research was also supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Library of Medicine. Calculations were carried out on the Texas A&M Department of Chemistry Medusa computer system funded by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. CHE-0541587, and the Biowulf Linux cluster at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (http://biowulf.nih.gov).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wiberg KB, Walters VA, Wong KN, Colson SD. J. Phys. Chem. 1984;88:6067. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wong KN, Colson SD. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1984;104:129. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Henri V, Angenot P. J. Chim. Phys. 1936;33:641. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sponer H, Stuecklen H. J. Chem. Phys. 1946;14:101. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boopalachandran P, Laane J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008;462:178. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boopalachandran P, Kim S, Choo J, Laane J. Chem Phys. Lett. 2011;514:214. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Medhi KC, Medhi RN. Spectrochim. Acta. 1990;46A:1169. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Medhi KC, Medhi RN. Spectrochim. Acta. 1990;46A:1333. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sheu H-L, Kim S, Laane J. J. Phys. Chem A. 2013;117:13596. doi: 10.1021/jp407592r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haller K, Chiang W-Y, del Rosario A, Laane J. J. Mol. Struct. 1996;379:19. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Laane J, Haller K, Sakurai S, Morris K, Autrey D, Arp Z, Chiang W-Y, Combs A. J. Mol. Struct. 2003;650:57. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Møller C, Plesset MS. Physical Review. 1934;46:618. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dunning TH., Jr J. Chem. Phys. 1989;90:1007. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Phys. Rev. B. 1998;37:785. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Becke AD. J. Chem. Phys. 1993;98:98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krishnan R, Binkley JS, Seeger R, Pople JA. J. Chem. Phys. 1980;72:650. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Clark T, Chandrasekhar J, Spitznagel GW, Schleyer PVR. J. Comp. Chem. 1983;4:294. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hariharan PC, Pople JA. Theoret. Chim. Acta. 1973;28:213. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schmidt MW, Gordon MS. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1998;49:233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Jr., Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. Gaussian 09, Revision A.02. Gaussian, Inc.; Wallingford CT: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Matsunaga N, Nguyen KA, Su S, Windus TL, Dupuis M, Montgomery JA. J. Comput. Chem. 1993;14:1347. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gordon MS, Schmidt MW. In: Advances in Electronic Structure Theory: GAMESS a Decade Later, Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry: The First Forty Years. Dykstra CE, Frenking G, Kim KS, Scuseria GE, editors. Elsevier Publishing; Amsterdam, Netherlands: 2005. pp. 1167–1189. Chapter 41. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Laane J. Appl. Spectrosc. 1970;24:73. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES