Abstract
Infrared and Raman spectra of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine (TFPy) were recorded and vibrational frequencies were assigned for its S0 electronic ground states. Ab initio and density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to complement the experimental work. The lowest electronic excited state of this molecule was investigated with ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy and theoretical CASSCF calculations. The band origin was found to be at 35,704.6 cm−1 in the ultraviolet absorption spectrum. A slightly puckered structure with a barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1 was predicted by CASSCF calculations for the S1(π,π*) state. Lower frequencies for the out-of-plane ring bending vibrations for the electronic excited state result from the weaker bonding within the pyridine ring.
Keywords: vibrational spectra; ultraviolet absorption spectra; electronic excited state; molecular structure; 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The vibrations of the pyridine (Py) molecule have been extensively studied in both its ground [1,2] and excited electronic states [3-5]. This molecule is rigidly planar in its ground state but becomes quasi-planar with a tiny barrier to planarity of 3 cm−1 in its S1(n,π*) electronic excited state [5]. In order to understand what effect fluorine substitution has on the structure of this ring system in electronic excited states, in recent years we have carried out ultraviolet absorption and theoretical studies of several fluoropyridines. In 2011 we reported our results on 2-fluoropyridine (2FPy) and 3-fluoropyridne (3FPy) [6] which had previously been studied under low resolution by Medhi and Medhi [7,8]. Our work showed that these molecules remain planar and fairly rigid in their excited states. In 2013 we published our results on 2,6-difluoropyridine (26DFPy) [9]. For the S1(π,π*) state of this molecule the experimental results supported a planar structure although two different theoretical computations predicted conflicting results (a planar structure from CASSCF but a non-planar structure with small barrier to planarity from TD-B3LYP). The S2(n,π*) state for 26DFPy has a calculated barrier to planarity of 256 cm−1. In the present study we report our results for 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine (TFPy) for both its ground and first excited electronic states.

EXPERIMENTAL
2,3,5,6-Tetrafluoropyridine (99% purity) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The liquid and vapor-phase infrared spectra were obtained using a Bruker Vertex 70 Fourier-transform spectrometer equipped with a globar light source, a KBr beamsplitter and a deuterated lanthanum triglycine sulfate (DLaTGS) detector for mid-infrared. A 10 cm glass cell with KBr windows and 20 Torr of sample was used. For the far-infrared region, a Mylar beamsplitter and a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector and polyethylene windows for the gas cell were used. Measurements were done with 1024 scans at 0.5 cm−1 resolution. The liquid and vapor-phase Raman spectra were collected using a Jobin-Yvon U-1000 spectrometer equipped with a frequency-doubled Nd:YAG Coherent Verdi-10 laser and CCD detector. The laser excitation at 532 nm provided a power of 1W for liquid samples and 6W for vapor samples. The effective resolution was 0.7 cm−1. The vapor sample was sealed in a specially designed glass cell as described previously [10,11]. Parallel and perpendicular polarization measurements were made utilizing the standard accessory and scrambler. Ultraviolet absorption spectra of vapor samples were recorded with a Bomem DA8.02 Fourier transform spectrometer. The vapor sample was loaded into a 20 cm glass cell with quartz window and measurements were done by taking the average of 4000 scans at 1 cm−1 resolution.
THEORETICAL COMPUTATIONS
The molecular structure of TFPy in its S0 electronic ground state were computed using the second-order Møller-Plesset (MP2) level of theory [12] with the cc-pVTZ basis set [13]. The B3LYP [14,15] density functional with the 6-311++G(d,p) [16-18] basis set was used to compute the harmonic vibrational frequencies. A scaling factor of 0.964 was used for C-H stretching frequencies and 0.985 for frequencies below 1,800 cm−1 based on our previous work [5,6,9]. In addition, the complete active-space self-consistent field (CASSCF) method [19] were also employed to investigate the vibrational frequencies of TFPy in its S0 and S1(π,π*) state. The active space for the CASSCF computations consisted of eight electrons (two lone-pair electrons and six π electrons) distributed in seven orbitals (one lone-pair orbital on the nitrogen atom and six π orbitals). A scaling factor of 0.905 was used for all vibrational frequencies computed at the CASSCF level. All MP2 and B3LYP were carried out using the Gaussian 09 program package [20], and CASSCF computations were done using the GAMESS package [21,22].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In its S0 ground state TFPy was predicted to have a planar structure with C2v symmetry. For the S1(π,π*) excited state a puckered structure with a barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1 was predicted by CASSCF computations. The calculated structures for TFPy in its S0 ground state and S1(π,π*) excited state are shown in Figure 1. As expected, the excited state has longer bond lengths in the pyridine ring as compared to the ground state due to the decrease in π bond character. The N-C, C(2)-C(3) and C(3)-C(4) bond lengths are longer in the S1(π,π*) state by 0.033 Å, 0.037 Å, and 0.044 Å, respectively.
Figure 1.
Calculated structures of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine (TFPy) in its electronic ground and excited states.
The liquid and vapor phase infrared and Raman spectra of TFPy are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively, and are compared with those computed with the DFT B3LYP method using the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. Good agreement between experimental and calculated frequency values was found. A few overtone bands were observed in the experimental liquid and vapor spectra, but the calculated spectrum provides only the fundamental vibrational frequencies. Both the experimental and calculated frequencies for the infrared and Raman spectra are summarized in Table 1. As indicated in the table, the v2 ring-stretching vibration is in Fermi resonance with a combination band of a C-H wag (v14) and ring twist (v15) which results in a band near 1611 cm−1 in the liquid and vapor infrared and Raman spectra. Three infrared band types (type A, type B and type C bands) were clearly observed in the infrared spectrum and examples of these are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 2.
Calculated and observed infrared spectra of TFPy.
Figure 3.
Calculated and observed Raman spectra of TFPy .
Table 1.
Vibrational spectra (cm−1) and assignments for the electronic ground and excited states of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine.
| C2v | ν | Approximate description | Calculated |
IR |
Raman |
S1 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ν | Intensityd | Liquide | Vaporf | Liquid | Vapor | Cal. | Obs. | |||
| A1 | 1 | C-H stretch | 3101 | (0.4, 100) | 3082 m | 3091 w (B) | 3080 (2) | 3089 (4) | 3072 | - |
| 2 | Ring stretchc | 1632 | (4, 7) | 1640 s | 1640 w (A/B) | 1640 (0.3) | - | 1554 | - | |
| 3 | Ring stretch (C-F) | 1443 | (7, 2) | 1446 s | 1450 s (B) | 1445 (0.2) | - | 1381 | 1380 | |
| 4 | C-F stretch | 1401 | (0.2, 37) | 1405 m | 1414 w (B) | 1401 (7) | 1404 (7) | 1361 | 1358 | |
| 5 | C-F stretch (ring) | 1223 | (30, 0.8) | 1228 s | 1233 s (B) | 1226 (0.3) | - | 1104 | 1100 | |
| 6 | Ring breathing | 746 | (2, 100) | 742 s | 742 m (B) | 742 (100) | 740 (100) | 690 | 709 | |
| 7 | Ring bending (in-plane) | 684 | (2, 5) | 693 s | 692 m (B) | 692 (5) | 690 (6) | 672 | 689 | |
| 8 | Ring bending (in-plane) | 505 | (0.3, 42) | 506 m | 505 w (B) | 505 (53) | 503 (39) | 451 | 453 | |
| 9 | C-F wag (in-plane) | 355 | (0.3, 0.5) | 360 m | 358 w (B) | 359 (1) | 357 (1) | 347 | 347 | |
| 10 | C-F wag (in-plane) | 278 | (0.1, 2) | 283 m | 280 w (B) | 282 (3) | 280 sh (2) | 265 | 280 | |
| A2 | 11 | Ring twisting | 699 | (0, 0.1) | - | - | 692 (5) | - | 383 | 373 |
| 12 | C-F wag (out-of-plane) | 454 | (0, 17) | - | - | 451 (25) | 451 (10) | 305 | 302b | |
| 13 | C-F wag (out-of-plane) | 115 | (0, 0.004) | - | - | - | - | 98 | 84 | |
| B1 | 14 | C-H wag | 897 | (4, 2) | 895 s | 900 s (C) | 900 (0.6) | - | 406 | 400 |
| 15 | Ring twisting | 736 | (2, 4) | 719 s | 723 m (C) | 718 (3) | - | 335 | 328 | |
| 16 | Ring bending (out-of-plane) | 485 | (0.06, 0.9) | 477 w | 475 w (C) | 477 (0.6) | - | 108a | 110 | |
| 17 | C-F wag (out-of-plane) | 296 | (0.2, 9) | 303 m | 297 w (C) | 302 (10) | 301 (4) | 303 | 302b | |
| 18 | C-F wag (out-of-plane) | 201 | (0.4, 0.1) | 211 m | 201 w (C) | 210 (0.7) | - | 198a | 165 | |
| B2 | 19 | Ring stretchc | 1634 | (0.7, 36) | 1640 s | 1640 w (A/B) | 1640 (0.3) | - | 1770 | - |
| 20 | Ring stretch (C-F) | 1495 | (100, 4) | 1483 s | 1500 s (A) | 1482 (0.1) | - | 1518 | - | |
| 21 | Ring stretch | 1302 | (9, 9) | 1274 s | 1270 m (A) | 1274 (0.7) | - | 1385 | - | |
| 22 | C-H wag | 1188 | (8.4, 0.02) | 1189 s | 1191 m (A) | 1188 (0.1) | - | 1151 | - | |
| 23 | C-F stretch (ring) | 1145 | (2.5, 13) | 1139 m | 1149 m (A) | 1139 (1) | 1145 (1) | 1137 | - | |
| 24 | C-F stretch | 901 | (18, 0.9) | 896 s | 900 s (A) | 900 (0.6) | 894 (1) | 825 | 809 | |
| 25 | C-F wag (in-plane) | 656 | (0.3, 7) | 659 m | 659 w (A) | 658 (2) | - | 617 | 611 | |
| 26 | Ring bend (in-plane) | 448 | (0.007, 16) | 452 w | - | 451 (25) | 444 (9) | 408 | 420 | |
| 27 | C-F wag (in-plane) | 299 | (0.02, 0.01) | - | 297 w (A) | - | 299 (4) | 293 | 290 | |
Coupled vibrations
Assigned twice
v2 and v19 overlap in the spectra; v2 is in Fermi resonance with v14 + v15 and this gives a band near 1611 cm−1 in the liquid and vapor infrared and Raman spectra
Relative intensities for IR and Raman
s: strong m: medium w: weak
A, B, and C in parentheses indicate the infrared band types.
Figure 4.
Examples of band types in the infrared spectrum of TFPy.
The ultraviolet absorption spectrum of TFPy vapor is shown in Figure 5. The band origin which corresponds to a transition to the S1(π,π*) excited state is at 35,704.6 cm−1. A comparison of observed and calculated vibrational frequencies for the S1(π,π*) excited state is presented in Table 1. A strong coupling between the out-of-plane ring bending and out-of-plane C-F wag was observed. A listing of the observed ultraviolet bands and the assignments for the excited state vibrational transitions are shown in Table 2. Examination of Tables 1 and 2 shows that the lower frequency A1 vibrations (v6 to v10) in the electronic excited state were observed directly. For the non-totally symmetric vibrations many of the overtones were observed. For example, transition 1320 at 167 cm−1 shows v13 in the excited state to be at about 84 cm−1. As expected due to the decreased bonding character in the S1(π,π*) state, essentially all of the vibrational frequencies in the excited state have lower values than the corresponding modes in the S0 ground state.
Figure 5.
Ultraviolet absorption spectra of TFPy relative to the band origin at 35,704.4 cm−1.
Table 2.
Ultraviolet absorption spectra (cm−1) and assignments for 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine.
| Observed | Peak intensitya | Assignment | Inferred |
|---|---|---|---|
| −784 | w | −506-283 = −789 | |
| −763 | w | ||
| −738 | m | −742 | |
| −675 | m | ||
| −573 | w | −[115]-451 = −566 | |
| −504 | mw | −505 | |
| −480 | mw | ||
| −458 | w | ||
| −438 | w | ||
| −395 | m | 328-723 = −395 | |
| −359 | w | ||
| −297 | mw | ||
| −280 | ms | 0-280 = −280 | |
| −219 | w | 280-503 = −223 | |
| −211 | w | ||
| −198 | w | ||
| −178 | m | 302-475 = −173 | |
| −122 | ms | ||
| −112 | ms | ||
| −101 | mw | ||
| −87 | ms | 325-412 = −87 | |
| −38 | m | 165-201 = −36 | |
| −21 | s | 84-105 = −21 | |
| 45 | ms | 325-280 = 45 | |
| 67 | ms | 346-280 = 66 | |
| 75 | m | ||
| 101 | m | 453-357 = 96 | |
| 145 | m | ||
| 167 | ms | 84×2 = 168 | |
| 172 | m | 453-280 = 173 | |
| 176 | m | ||
| 193 | m | 400-201 = 199 | |
| 200 | m | ||
| 214 | ms | 110×2 = 220 | |
| 222 | w | ||
| 234 | w | ||
| 244 | m | ||
| 260 | s | 280+84-105 = 261 | |
| 275 | s | 110+165 = 275 | |
| 280 | s | 280-0 = 280 | |
| 310 | mw | 611-299 = 312 | |
| 325 | s | 165×2 = 330 | |
| 346 | s | 346-0 = 346 | |
| 355 | mw | 709-357 = 52 | |
| 391 | m | ||
| 411 | m | 689-280 = 409 | |
| 414 | w | 302+110 = 412 | |
| 423 | m | ||
| 428 | m | 709-280 = 429 | |
| 435 | m | 328+110 = 438 | |
| 446 | s | ||
| 453 | s | 453-0 = 453 | |
| 522 | m | ||
| 535 | m | ||
| 546 | mw | ||
| 556 | mw | ||
| 563 | s | 280×2 = 560 | |
| 400+165 = 565 | |||
| 580 | m | 290×2 = 580 | |
| 603 | m | 302×2 = 604 | |
| 625 | s | 346+280 = 626 | |
| 633 | m | 328+302 = 630 | |
| 646 | m | ||
| 650 | mw | ||
| 655 | m | 328×2 = 656 | |
| 667 | mw | ||
| 689 | ms | 689-0 = 689 | |
| 692 | m | 346×2 = 692 | |
| 709 | s | 710-0 = 710 | |
| 726 | ms | 400+328 = 728 | |
| 733 | ms | 453+280 = 733 | |
| 746 | ms | 373×2 = 746 | |
| 754 | m | ||
| 768 | w | ||
| 779 | w | ||
| 788 | w | ||
| 799 | m | 400×2 = 800 | |
| 453+346 = 799 | |||
| 841 | m | 420×2 = 840 | |
| 862 | m | ||
| 880 | m | ||
| 901 | m | 611+290 = 901 | |
| 906 | m | 453×2 = 906 | |
| 927 | mw | ||
| 949 | mw | ||
| 957 | mw | ||
| 969 | m | 689+280 = 969 | |
| 991 | s | 710+280 = 990 | |
| 1029 | m | 611+420 = 1031 | |
| 1037 | m | 689+346 = 1035 | |
| 1051 | m | ||
| 1058 | m | 710+346 = 1056 | |
| 1071 | m | ||
| 1081 | m | ||
| 1128 | m | ||
| 1143 | m | 689+453 = 1142 | |
| 1162 | ms | 710+453 = 1163 | |
| 1204 | mw | ||
| 1231 | mw | 611×2 = 1222 | |
| 809+420 = 1229 | |||
| 1247 | mw | ||
| 1255 | mw | ||
| 1274 | mw | ||
| 1278 | m | ||
| 1285 | m | ||
| 1293 | m | ||
| 1331 | m | ||
| 1364 | m | ||
| 1401 | m | ||
| 1422 | m | 710×2 = 1420 | |
| 809+611 = 1420 | |||
| 1446 | m | 1100+346 = 1446 | |
| 1511 | w | ||
| 1619 | m | 809×2 = 1618 | |
| 1705 | m | 1358+346 = 1704 | |
| 1726 | m | 1380+346 = 1726 | |
| 1877 | mw | ||
| 1895 | mw | ||
| 1987 | mw | ||
| 2091 | mw | ||
| 2134 | m | ||
| 2153 | m | ||
| 2367 | mw | ||
| 2415 | m | ||
| 2600 | w | ||
| 2699 | w | ||
| 2796 | w | ||
| 2824 | mw | ||
| 3106 | mw |
s – strong, m – medium, w –weak, v - very
Py, 2FPy,3FPy, 26DFPy and TFPy all have planar and rigid structures in their electronic ground states. Py is extremely floppy in its S1(n,π*) excited state and its out-of-plane ring bending frequency drops from 403 cm−1 to 60 cm−1 [5]. It has a tiny barrier to planarity of 3 cm−1. Despite their planar structures, 2FPy, 3FPy, and 26DFPy all become floppier in their excited states with significant drops in their ring puckering frequencies from 414 cm−1, 412 cm−1 and 460 cm−1 to 96 cm−1, 118 cm−1 and 127 cm−1 , respectively [6,9]. A slightly puckered structure is predicted by CASSCF calculations for TFPy with a barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1. This indicates that TFPy also has a floppier structure in the excited state and this is confirmed by the lowering of out-of-plane ring bending frequency from 475 cm−1 in the electronic ground state to 110 cm−1 in the S1(π,π*) excited state. A strong coupling between the out-of-plane ring bending and the out-of-plane C-F wag motions was also observed. In fact, the out-of-plane ring bending frequency even drops below the out-of-plane C-F wag due to the increased antibonding character in the excited state.
Although the out-of-plane ring bending vibration of TFPy is coupled to the C-F out-of-plane wagging motion, we can approximate the ring-bending potential energy function for the excited S1(π,π*) state based on the experimental data and theoretical calculations. Previously we carried out a similar calculation for 26DFPy [9]. For TFPy we utilized the calculated barrier of 30 cm−1 and the observed ring-bending frequency of 110 cm−1. The resulting potential energy function in reduced coordinates [23] is shown in Figure 6. Because of the coupling of the bending with the C-F wagging, a meaningful reduced mass for the motion could not be calculated thus requiring the use of reduced coordinates. It is notable that while there is a small barrier to planarity, the lowest quantum state lies above the barrier so we describe this molecule as quasi-planar, similar to pyridine itself.
Figure 6.
Calculated ring-bending potential energy function of TFPy in reduced coordinates. The 110 cm−1 transition was observed while the 183 cm−1 transition was calculated.
Table 3 summarizes the excited state results for pyridine and the four fluoropyridines that we have studied. All of these molecules are rigid in their ground electronic states but become less rigid in their S(n,π*) and S(π,π*) states. For the excited states the barriers to planarity, if present, are small. As seen in the table, fluorinating the pyridine ring increases the frequency of the π→π* transition and this indicates that the fluorine atom somewhat increases the πbond stabilization. However, the addition of four fluorine atoms to the pyridine ring in TFPy curiously has less of an effect than adding one or two fluorine atoms for 2FPy, 3FPy, and 26DFPy. It is also not clear why 2FPy and 3FPy remain planar in their excited states while pyridine, 26DFPy, and TFPy show more of a tendency to become non-planar.
Table 3.
Excited state barrier to planarity and puckering angles of pyridine and fluoropyridines in their excited states.
| Molecules |
State |
Band Origin (cm−1) |
Barrier (cm−1) |
Puckering Anglea |
Method |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Py | S1 (n, π*) | 34,767.0 | 3 | Quasi-planar | Experiment | 1 |
| S2 (π, π*) | 38,350.0 | - | - | Experiment | 15 | |
| 2FPy | S1 (π, π*) | 38,030.4 | 0 | Planar | CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) | 2 |
| S2 (n, π*) | 39,199 (Calc.) | 0 | Planar | CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) | 2 | |
| 3FPy | S1 (n, π*) | 35,051.7 | 0 | Planar | CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) | 2 |
| S2 (π, π*) | 37,339.0 | 0 | Planar | CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) | 2 | |
| 26DFPy | S1 (π, π*) | 37,820.2 | 124 | 11.2 ° / 22.7 ° | TD-B3LYP / 6-311++G(d, p) | 3 |
| S1 (π, π*) | 37,820.2 | 0 | Planar | CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) | 3 | |
| S2 (n, π*) | 42,323 (Calc.) | 256 | 38.9 ° / 25.9 ° | CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) | 3 | |
| TFPy | S1 (π, π*) | 35,704.6 | 30 | 2.9 ° / 4.5 ° | CASSCF / 6-311++G(d, p) | This work |
The two values for the puckering angle refer to the out-of-plane angles from the ring to the N atom and the C atom directly opposite, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
TFPy has a rigid planar structure in its electronic ground state and the structure becomes floppier in the excited state with a small barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1. The infrared, Raman and ultraviolet absorption spectra were recorded and the vibrational frequencies were assigned for both ground and excited states with the aid of theoretical calculations. A potential energy function based on experimental and theoretical results was calculated.
HIGHLIGHTS.
* The structures of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine (TFPy) for its S0 ground and S1(π,π*) electronic excited states have been calculated.
* TFPy is calculated to be rigidly planar in its ground electronic state, but is quasi-planar and floppy with a barrier to planarity of 30 cm−1 in its excited state.
* The vibrational frequencies for both the S0 and S1(π,π*) states have been assigned and those agree well with the theoretical computations.
* A ring-bending potential energy function for the S1(π,π*) state was proposed based on experimental and theoretical data.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank the Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grant A-0396) for financial support. This research was also supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Library of Medicine. Calculations were carried out on the Texas A&M Department of Chemistry Medusa computer system funded by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. CHE-0541587, and the Biowulf Linux cluster at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (http://biowulf.nih.gov).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Wiberg KB, Walters VA, Wong KN, Colson SD. J. Phys. Chem. 1984;88:6067. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wong KN, Colson SD. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1984;104:129. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Henri V, Angenot P. J. Chim. Phys. 1936;33:641. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sponer H, Stuecklen H. J. Chem. Phys. 1946;14:101. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boopalachandran P, Laane J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008;462:178. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boopalachandran P, Kim S, Choo J, Laane J. Chem Phys. Lett. 2011;514:214. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Medhi KC, Medhi RN. Spectrochim. Acta. 1990;46A:1169. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Medhi KC, Medhi RN. Spectrochim. Acta. 1990;46A:1333. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sheu H-L, Kim S, Laane J. J. Phys. Chem A. 2013;117:13596. doi: 10.1021/jp407592r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Haller K, Chiang W-Y, del Rosario A, Laane J. J. Mol. Struct. 1996;379:19. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Laane J, Haller K, Sakurai S, Morris K, Autrey D, Arp Z, Chiang W-Y, Combs A. J. Mol. Struct. 2003;650:57. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Møller C, Plesset MS. Physical Review. 1934;46:618. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dunning TH., Jr J. Chem. Phys. 1989;90:1007. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Phys. Rev. B. 1998;37:785. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Becke AD. J. Chem. Phys. 1993;98:98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Krishnan R, Binkley JS, Seeger R, Pople JA. J. Chem. Phys. 1980;72:650. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Clark T, Chandrasekhar J, Spitznagel GW, Schleyer PVR. J. Comp. Chem. 1983;4:294. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hariharan PC, Pople JA. Theoret. Chim. Acta. 1973;28:213. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schmidt MW, Gordon MS. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1998;49:233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Jr., Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. Gaussian 09, Revision A.02. Gaussian, Inc.; Wallingford CT: 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Matsunaga N, Nguyen KA, Su S, Windus TL, Dupuis M, Montgomery JA. J. Comput. Chem. 1993;14:1347. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gordon MS, Schmidt MW. In: Advances in Electronic Structure Theory: GAMESS a Decade Later, Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry: The First Forty Years. Dykstra CE, Frenking G, Kim KS, Scuseria GE, editors. Elsevier Publishing; Amsterdam, Netherlands: 2005. pp. 1167–1189. Chapter 41. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Laane J. Appl. Spectrosc. 1970;24:73. [Google Scholar]







