Skip to main content
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) logoLink to Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
. 2015 Jun 16;9:1077–1079. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S82852

Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of isolates in delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis

Animesh Jindal 1, Avinash Pathengay 1,, Subhadra Jalali 2, Annie Mathai 2, Rajeev Reddy Pappuru 2, Raja Narayanan 2, Jay Chhablani 2, Savitri Sharma 3,4, Taraprasad Das 2,3, Harry W Flynn Jr 5
PMCID: PMC4476472  PMID: 26124631

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the microbiological spectrum and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates in delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis. A retrospective review of 33 consecutive patients with culture proven delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis was done from January 2006 to March 2013. There were 22 bacterial and eleven fungal cases. Common isolates were Streptococci (seven cases), coagulase-negative staphylococci (five), Gram-negative bacilli (seven), Nocardia (two), Aspergillus (five), Candida (five). Gram-positive cocci were most susceptible to vancomycin and gatifloxacin (91.7%). Gram-negative isolates were most susceptible to ofloxacin (85.7%). Fungi being slow growing organisms are an important cause of delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis.

Keywords: delayed endophthalmitis, microbiology, antibiotic sensitivity

Introduction

Endophthalmitis is a serious vision threatening complication of cataract surgery. It can be classified into two broad categories: acute-onset and delayed-onset. According to endophthalmitis vitrectomy study, infection occurring within 6 weeks after cataract surgery was defined as acute-onset and after 6 weeks as delayed-onset.1 These two categories differ in their microbiological spectrum.2

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the spectrum of organisms causing culture proven delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis and their antimicrobial susceptibilities at our center between 2006 and 2013 and compare it with available western literature.

Methods

This was a retrospective, non-comparative, consecutive case series. Microbiology records were reviewed of all the culture proven delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis cases treated at L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India between January 2006 and March 2013. The study was approved by the institutional review board and adhered to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Vitreous samples from all patients had been investigated for bacteria and fungus using institutional protocol. Bacterial isolates were identified using Analytical Profile Index system until 2010 and Vitek-2 compact system (bioMérieux, Craponne, France), thereafter. The susceptibility was determined by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Fungal species were identified based on their colony and microscopic characteristics. Susceptibilities for fungal isolates were not performed.

Results

Microbial spectrum

A total of 33 isolates from 33 vitreous samples were identified. Isolates included 12 (36.4%) Gram-positive cocci, one (3.0%) Gram-positive bacilli, seven (21.2%) Gram-negative bacteria, two (6.1%) Nocardia sp., and eleven (33.3%) fungi (Table 1).

Table 1.

Organisms identified and their susceptibility results in delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis

Organism Total (%) Amikacin
Cefazolin
Ceftazidime
Gatifloxacin
Ciprofloxacin
Ofloxacin
Moxifloxacin
Vancomycin
N S % N S % N S % N S % N S % N S % N S % N S %
Gram-positive cocci 12 (36.4) 12 4 33.3 12 10 83.3 3 2 66.7 12 11 91.7 12 8 66.7 12 9 75.0 11 9 81.8 12 11 91.7
Coagulase negative staphylococci 5 (15.2) 5 4 80.0 5 4 80.0 5 5 100 5 2 40.0 5 3 60.0 5 4 80.0 5 5 100
Streptococcus spp. 7* (21.2) 7 0 0.0 7 6 85.7 3 2 66.7 7 6 85.7 7 6 85.7 7 6 85.7 6 5 83.3 7 6& 85.7
Gram positive bacilli 1 (3.0) 1 0 0.0 1 1 100 1 1 100 1 1 100 1 1 100 1 1 100 1 1 100
Listeria sp. 1 (3.0) 1 0 0.0 Not applicable Not applicable 1 1 100 1 1 100 1 1 100 1 1 100
Gram-negative organisms 7 (21.2) 7 4 57.1 7 5 71.4 7 5 71.4 7 5 71.4 7 6 85.7 7 5 71.4
Burkholderia cepacia 3 (9.1) 3 0 0.0 3 2 66.7 3 1 33.3 3 2 66.7 3 2 66.7 3 1 33.3
Other Gram-negative bacteria 4# (12.1) 4 4 100 4 3 75.0 4 3 75.0 4 3 75.0 4 4 100 4 4 100
Nocardia spp. 2 (6.1) 2 2 100 2 0 0.0 2 2 100 2 2 100 2 2 100 2 2 100 Not applicable
Total bacteria 22 (66.7) 22 10 45.5 15 11 73.3 11 8 72.7 22 19 86.4 22 16 72.7 22 18 81.8 20 16 80.0 15 14 93.3
Total fungi 11 (33.3)
Aspergillus sp.
Candida sp.
Bipolaris sp.
5 (15.2)
5 (15.2)
1 (3.0)
Susceptibility tests not performed

Notes: Bold values indicate main groups, ie, Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms, while the non-bold values indicate the other remaining groups.

*

Streptococcus pneumoniae (three), Streptococcus mitis (one), Enterococcus faecalis (one), alpha hemolytic streptococci (species not identified, one), beta hemolytic streptococci (species not identified, one).

#

Pseudomonas stutzeri (one), Roseomonas gilardii (one), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (one), Escherichia coli (one).

&

Enterococcus faecalis was resistant to vancomycin. N – number of samples tested for the given antibiotic, S – number of samples found susceptible to the antibiotic.

Most common isolates identified were coagulase negative staphylococci, Aspergillus sp. and Candida sp. (5/33, 15.2% each) followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (3/33, 9.1%) and Burkholderia cepacia (3/33, 9.1%).

Onset of endophthalmitis occurred 30 days to 15 years (median 150 days) post-operatively in streptococcal cases, 30 to 168 (median 72) days in coagulase-negative staphylococcal cases, 60 to 157 (median 84) days in Gram-negative cases, and 60 to 365 (median 76) days in fungal cases.

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Gram-positive cocci were most susceptible to vancomycin and gatifloxacin (91.7%). Gram-negative isolates were most susceptible to ofloxacin (85.7%) followed by ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin (71.4% each). Susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms to amikacin was 57.1%. These data can be viewed in detail in Table 1.

Discussion

The microorganisms in delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis are believed to be less virulent as indicated by its insidious onset and low grade of inflammation. In most of the studies published in the literature, Propionibacterium acnes were most commonly isolated from the vitreous samples of delayed-onset endophthalmitis.25 In the current study, P. acnes were not isolated from any sample. One of the reasons for this could be that anaerobic culture was not done in all cases. From India, there are mostly case reports on delayed-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery,6 thus it is not possible to comment on the incidence of P. acnes associated delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis in this region. A higher incidence of fungal isolates noted in the current study is consistent with other studies from the same geographic region.2 Fungi, being slow growing organisms, are the frequent cause of delayed-onset endophthalmitis. Comparison of microorganisms identified in various delayed-onset post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis studies is given in Table 2.

Table 2.

Microbiologic comparison of delayed-onset endophthalmitis studies

Current study (2006–2013) Shirodkar et al2 (2000–2009) Al-Mezaine et al3 (1997–2006) Fox et al5 (1979–1989)
Number of isolates 33 26 17 19
Propionibacterium acnes 0 11 7 12
Fungal species 11 7 3 3
Gram-positive species 13 3 3 4
Gram-negative species 7 3 1 0
Mycobacteria 0 2 0 0
Nocardia species 2 0 0 0
Mixed 0 0 3 0

The antimicrobial susceptibility of the organisms is comparable to that of the same organisms in different clinical settings like acute post-cataract endophthalmitis and post-traumatic endophthalmitis in the same geographic region.7,8 Gram-positive organisms are most susceptible to vancomycin and Gram-negative organisms to fluoroquinolones and ceftazidime. Low susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms to amikacin was due to B. cepacia being the most common cause and they have been shown to be less susceptible to amikacin as compared to ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin.9

This is the first study from India on the antimicrobial spectrum and antimicrobial susceptibility of delayed post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis. Less virulent and slow growing organisms like coagulase negative staphylococci and fungi are the most common causative agents of delayed-onset endophthalmitis.

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Johnson MW, Doft BH, Kelsey SF, et al. The Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study: relationship between clinical presentation and microbiologic spectrum. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(2):261–272. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30326-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shirodkar AR, Pathengay A, Flynn HW, Jr, et al. Delayed-versus acute- onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(3):391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Assiri A, Al-Rajhi AA. Incidence, clinical features, causative organisms, and visual outcomes of delayed-onset pseudophakic endophthalmitis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19(5):804–811. doi: 10.1177/112067210901900519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clark WL, Kaiser PK, Flynn HW, Jr, Belfort A, Miller D, Meisler DM. Treatment strategies and visual acuity outcomes in chronic postoperative Propionibacterium acnes endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(9):1665–1670. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90348-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fox GM, Joondeph BC, Flynn HW, Jr, Pflugfelder SC, Roussel TJ. Delayed-onset pseudophakic endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111(2):163–173. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72254-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chaudhry M, Baisakhiya S, Bhatia MS. A rare complication of Nd-YAG capsulotomy: propionibacterium acnes endopthalmitis. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2011;3(1):80–82. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v3i1.4283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jindal A, Pathengay A, Mithal K, et al. Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of isolates in acute postcataract surgery endophthalmitis: are they same as they were more than a decade ago? Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(3):414–416. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jindal A, Pathengay A, Mithal K, et al. Endophthalmitis after open globe injuries: changes in microbiological spectrum and isolate susceptibility patterns over 14 years. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2014;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1869-5760-4-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sachdeva V, Pathengay A, Joseph J, Sharma S, Das T. Burkholderia cepacia endophthalmitis: clinico-microbiologic profile and outcomes. Retina. 2011;31(9):1801–1805. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31820a6a03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES