Abstract
Effective tuberculosis (TB) vaccine should target tubercle bacilli with various metabolic states and confer long-term protective immunity. In this study, we constructed a novel multi-stage TB subunit vaccine based on fusion protein ESAT6-Ag85B-MPT64(190-198)-Mtb8.4-HspX (LT69 for short) which combined early expressed antigens and latency-associated antigen. The fusion protein was mixed with an adjuvant being composed of N, N’-dimethyl-N, N’-dioctadecylammonium bromide (DDA) and polyriboinosinic polyribocytidylic acid (PolyI:C) to construct subunit vaccine, whose immunogenicity and protective ability were evaluated in C57BL/6 mice. The results showed that LT69 had strong immunogenicity and high protective effect against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) H37Rv aerosol challenge. Low-dose (2 μg) of LT69 generated long-term immune memory responses and provided effective protection, which was even higher than traditional vaccine BCG did at 30 weeks post the last vaccination. In conclusion, multistage subunit vaccine LT69 showed high and long-term protection against M. tuberculosis infection in mice, whose effect could be enhanced by using a relative low dosage of antigen.
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health problem and ranks as the second leading cause of death from an infectious disease [1]. Vaccination is still the most cost-effective approach towards improving public health in both industrialized and developing countries [2]. Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Gueerin (BCG) is the only TB vaccine for human use in current, but its protective efficacy wanes significantly over a period of 10–15 years [3, 4]. BCG vaccination mainly induces effector memory T cells (TEM) that survive for a shorter period of time than central memory T cells (TCM) [5], which may underlie the limited duration of BCG vaccine protection [6]. Therefore, novel vaccines and vaccine strategy should aim at inducing long-lasting T cell responses [7].
Subunit vaccines have been developed with the hope of boosting BCG-derived immunity so as to provide a long period of protection [8]. These vaccines include viral vector-based vaccines [9, 10] and recombinant proteins delivered with adjuvants. It was reported that the adjuvanted recombinant protein induced more memory/multifunctional T cells that lead to long-term immune memory responses compared to the viral vector in mouse and non-human primate TB models [11]. Therefore, recombinant protein-based subunit vaccine is perhaps the promising vaccine to provide long-term protection against TB.
T cell mediated immune response is believed to play an important role against M. tuberculosis infection. In response to vaccination, the majority of the activated T cells differentiate into antigen specific short-lived effector cells, whereas only a small proportion differentiates into long-lived memory cells [12, 13]. Antigen stimulation is the primary factor to regulate the diverse pattern of memory T cells [14]. Low-dose antigen and short-term antigen persistence were reported mainly to induce central memory T cell formation and hence facilitate development of long-term immunity in vivo [14, 15].
Our previous work showed that the combination of EAMM, which consists of four antigens highly expressed in replicating bacilli, and MH, which consists of dormancy-related antigen HspX, provided higher protective efficacy than EAMM or MH alone obviously [16]. These results suggest that vaccines combining antigens from both proliferation and dormant stages could generate broader immune responses and therefore could be more effective in eradicating all stages of M. tuberculosis. In this study, we fused EAMM and HspX together to construct a new multistage protein ESAT6-Ag85B-MPT64 (190–198)-Mtb8.4-HspX with molecular weight of 69kD, which was named as LT69. The immunogenicity and protective efficiency of it were evaluated in mice model.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
Animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of Council on Animal Care and Use. The protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (permit number: SYXK(Gan) 2013–001). Animals received free access to water and food throughout the study. During the experiments, the vaccinated and infected mice were monitored every day. Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation.
Bacterial strains
BCG Denmark strain was provided by Lanzhou Institute of Biological Products. M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain (ATCC 93009) was prepared by ABSL-3 Lab at Wuhan University. BCG and M. tuberculosis H37Rv were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 supplemented with oleic acid albumin dextrose catalase (OADC) (10% v/v) and glycerinum (0.5% v/v). Bacterial suspensions were frozen and stored at -80 ℃. Serial dilutions of the bacteria suspensions were plated on 7H11 OADC agar plates for colony forming units (CFU) counting before use.
Animals
C57BL/6 female mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from Slaccas Inc. (Beijing, China) and were maintained in special pathogen-free conditions in Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. For M. tuberculosis H37Rv challenge experiments, animals were kept in ABSL-3 lab at Wuhan University.
pET30a(+)-ESAT6-Ag85B-MPT64(190–198)-Mtb8.4-HspX plasmid construction
Recombinant pET30a(+)-Mtb8.4-HspX and pET30a(+)-ESAT6-Ag85B were produced as previously described [16]. The plasmid encoding ESAT6-Ag85B-MPT64(190–198)-Mtb8.4-HspX was generated by inserting the gene fragments into the multiple cloning sites of pET30a(+) successively as follows. Initially, the DNA sequences of MPT64(190–198)-Mtb8.4-HspX was generated by PCR amplification from pET30a(+)-Mtb8.4-HspX plasmid with the primer MMH F, 5’-3’GAAGATCT TTCGCAGTCACGAACGACGGGGTGATTAGGCTGTCGTTGACCGCA(Bgl II)and the primer MMH R, 5’-3’TAGGCAAGCTTTCAGTTGGTG GACCGGAT (Hind III), the sequence of MPT64190-198 is underlined. The fragment was cloned into the Bgl II and Hind III site of pET30(+) to construct the plasmid pET30(+)-MPT64(190–198)-Mtb8.4-HspX. ESAT6-Ag85B sequence was generated by PCR amplification from pET30a(+)-ESAT6-Ag85B plasmid with the primer EA F, 5’-3’ CGGCATATGACAGAGCAGC AGTGGAA T (Nde I) and EA R, 5’-3’ GAAGATCTGCCGGCGCCTAACGA ACTCTGGAG(Bgl II). Then this fragment was cloned into the unique sites Nde I and Bgl II of the previously constructed pET30(+)-MPT64(190–198)-Mtb8.4-HspX plasmid to get the last plasmid. The final plasmid was transformed into the E. coli strain BL21 to express the fusion protein LT69.
Expression and purification of mycobacterial fusion proteins
E. coli BL21 expressing LT69 was incubated with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyanoside (IPTG) for 6 h at 25 ℃. Then, cells were harvested and sonicated. Finally, the supernatant containing the target protein LT69 was subjected to purification as below.
Two steps were involved in the purification of LT69. First, saturated ammonium sulfate was added to the protein sample to 8% of saturation, and followed by centrifugation. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in buffer A (phosphate buffer, 20 mM; pH7.4). The resuspended pellet was subjected to ammonium sulfate precipitation using 6%, 4% and 2% saturation successively. The final precipitate was collected and resuspended in buffer A containing 0.02 M arginine and 1 M urea. Second, the LT69 was further purified by a gel filtration chromatography (GFC) on Superdex 75 column. At last, the protein LT69 was eluted from the resin with buffer B (phosphate buffer, 20 mM; sodium chloride, 0.15 M; pH7.4). Endotoxin level of the fusion protein LT69 was quantified by Gel Clot Tachypleus Amebocyte lysate (TAL) assay (Zhanjiang A&C Biological Ltd., Zhanjiang, China). MH and EAMM were purified as described previously [16, 17].
Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of the fusion protein LT69 in adjuvant of DDA-Poly (I:C)
Mice were injected with 10 μg of LT69 emulsified in an adjuvant being composed of N, N'-dimethyl-N, N'-dioctadecylammonium bromide (DDA) (250 μg/dose; Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid [Poly (I:C)] (50 μg/dose; Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) subcutaneously with a total volume of 200 μl/mice. Mice received 10 μg of EAMM plus 10 μg of MH, BCG (5 × 106 CFU) and PBS were served as controls. BCG was injected once at week 0. Other groups received three times inoculations at week 0, 2, and 4 respectively.
Six weeks after the last immunization, the levels of antigen-specific IFN-γ, IL-2 and antibodies were analyzed. IFN-γ was tested using an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay following 20-h incubation of splenocytes with special antigens including ESAT-6 (10 μg/ml), Ag85B (5 μg/ml), Mtb8.4 (10 μg/ml), HspX6 (10 μg/ml) and PPD (5 μg/ml). IL-2 secretion was detected by ELISA assay from the spleen cells culture supernatant. The levels of IgG1 and IgG2c antibodies against ESAT6 (10 μg/ml), Ag85B (5 μg/ml) and HspX (10 μg/ml) in mouse sera were determined using ELISA assay as described previously [17].
Thirty weeks after the last immunization, mice were challenged with virulent M. tuberculosis H37Rv via the respiratory route at approximately 50–100 CFU per mouse. For infection, frozen bacteria stocks were thawed and diluted to 106 CFU/mL, and nebulized in an aerosol infection chamber (Salter Labs,CA, USA) containing the mice. Infectious dose was determined by plating whole lung homogenates on day 1. Ten weeks later, the animals were euthanized, and lungs and spleens were homogenised in saline and plated at 10-fold serial dilutions on Middlebrook 7H11 agar (BD, NJ, USA) enriched with OADC (BD, NJ, USA) and an antibiotic mixture including carbenicillin, trimethoprim and amphotericin B (Sigma, MO, USA).
Immune memory responses induced by different doses of LT69
LT69 vaccine was used for vaccination in doses of 2 μg, 10 μg and 50 μg in 200μl separately. Mice were vaccinated subcutaneously three times with 2 weeks apart. Control mice received PBS or a single dose of 5 × 106 CFU BCG. Six weeks and twenty-four weeks after the last injection, the antigen specific IFN-γ secretion was detected by ELISPOT as described above.
Statistical analysis
The results were expressed as means ± SD. Data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and SPSS13.0 software. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results
Expression and purification of LT69, EAMM and MH
The fusion protein LT69 could be expressed in E. coli in supernatant (Fig 1A) and was purified by gradient salt fractionation and gel filtration chromatography successively (Fig 1B). The fusion proteins EAMM and MH [17] were purified and confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Fig 1C) and Western-blot (data not shown). At a concentration of 0.4 mg/mL LT69, the endotoxin level was less than 2.5 EU/ml, which was lower than the limit for animal and in vitro experiment required.
LT69 was of strong immunogenicity and high protective efficacy
With the stimulation of ESAT6, Ag85B, Mtb8.4 or PPD in vitro, the production of IFN-γ and IL-2 by spleen cells from mice immunized with LT69 were higher than that from PBS, BCG and EAMM+MH (p < 0.05) (Fig 2). With the stimulation of HspX, the IFN-γ secretions in the group of LT69 were higher than PBS, and BCG groups, but the differences between the groups of LT69 and EAMM+MH were not obvious (Fig 2A).
IgG1 and IgG2c antibody titers against antigens ESAT6, Ag85B and HspX and the relative ratio of IgG2c titer to IgG1 titer in LT69 group were significantly higher than that of BCG group (p < 0.05) and almost as same as EAMM+MH group (Table 1). The antibody titers in PBS control group were negative.
Table 1. Serological responses to antigens in LT69 vaccine immunized mice.
Anti-ESAT6 | Anti-Ag85B | Anti-HspX | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IgG1 | IgG2c | IgG2c/IgG1 | IgG1 | IgG2c | IgG2c/IgG1 | IgG1 | IgG2c | IgG2c/IgG1 | |
PBS | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
BCG | 2.00 | < 2 | - | < 2 | < 2 | - | < 2 | < 2 | - |
EAMM+MH | 4.25±0.71 | 4.33±0.79 | 1.01±0.03 | 3.66±0.52 | 2.00 | 0.56±0.09 | 3.88±0.57 | 0.56±0.09 | 0.62±0.1 |
LT69(2 μg) * | 3.40± 1.14 | 4.51±0.62 | 1.4±0.38 | 3.96±0.52 | 3.43±0.15 | 0.88±0.14 | 4.18±0.15 | 0.88±0.14 | 0.75±0.04 |
LT69(10μg) * | 4.48±0.67 | 4.41±0.60 | 0.95±0.07 | 4.10±0.25 | 3.13±0.62 | 0.77±0.19 | 4.56±0.52 | 0.77±0.19 | 0.67±0.04 |
LT69(50μg) * | 4.55±0.3 | 4.31±0.69 | 0.91±0.15 | 4.41±0.25 | 3.12±0.62 | 0.71±0.17 | 4.41±0.81 | 0.71±0.17 | 0.63±0.2 |
*P < 0.05, relative to PBS and BCG groups
Furthermore, 30 weeks after the last vaccination, we detected the protective effect of LT69 vaccine using the M. tuberculosis H37Rv aerosol challenge model. Subunit vaccine LT0069 in dose of 2 μg showed higher effective rate of protection against M. tuberculosis than EAMM+MH and BCG did (p < 0.05), with 1.17 log10 CFU decline in the lungs compared with PBS control, while LT69 in 10 μg per dose showed the same protective efficacy as EAMM +MH and BCG, reducing approximately 0.85 log10 CFU of the bacilli in lungs compared with PBS control (Fig 3A).
Low-dose LT69 generated long-lived cellular immune responses
To examine the T cell immune memory induced by different dosages of LT69, mice were vaccinated with three doses of LT69 (2 μg, 10 μg or 50 μg) separately. Antigen specific cellular immune responses were detected twice at 6 and 24 weeks after the last immunization, respectively. Six weeks after the last inoculation, all the LT69 vaccinated mice had high levels of IFN-γ releasing from antigen stimulated splenocytes in vitro and there was no obvious difference among them (Fig 4). However, 24 weeks after the last immunization, the 2 μg of LT69 vaccinated mice generated significantly higher levels of IFN-γ than the mice received 10 μg and 50 μg of the vaccine (p < 0.01), and the 10 μg group generated higher immune responses than that of the 50 μg group (p < 0.05) (Fig 4). As for protective efficacy, 2 μg of LT69 immunization reduced more bacteria load in lung tissues than BCG and EAMM+MH did, but 10 μg of LT69 did not show so strong protection (Fig 3A).
Discussion
In this study we recombined our previous fusion protein EAMM and MH together to construct a novel multistage fusion protein LT69. We found that LT69 had at least the same levels of immunogenicity and protective efficacy against M. tuberculosis infection as EAMM plus MH did. Especially, low dosage of LT69 (2 μg/dose) induced higher long-term protective efficacy than traditional BCG at 30 weeks post vaccination.
According to the Yin-Yang model proposed, in either active TB or latent TB, the internal bacterial population consists of varying growing and non-growing sub-populations with different metabolic states and these populations can interconvert with each other [18]. Therefore, TB subunit vaccines should combine antigens in various growth stages of M. tuberculosis so as to provide protective immunity against bacteria in different metabolic states. In this study, LT69 vaccine consists of four antigens (ESAT6, Ag85B, Mtb8.4, and HspX) and a CD8 epitope (the 190–198 peptide of MPT64), which are the main immunodominant antigens expressed separately in replicating and dormant M. tuberculosis. Mice receiving LT69 generated robust antigens specific IFN-γ and IL-2 responses as well as high titers of antigen-specific antibodies, indicating that the novel vaccine consisting of five antigens had strong immunogenicity and the single antigens can be recognized well by LT69 induced immunity. Furthermore, LT69 had at least the same level of protective efficacy against M. tuberculosis infection as EAMM+MH and BCG vaccine(Fig 4A). All these suggested that LT69 vaccine might be a promising subunit vaccine to prevent TB by targeting several metabolic states of infected bacilli.
Besides generating broad and strong protective immunogenicity against infected bacilli with different metabolic states, multi-component vaccine LT69 might also be predicted having high population coverage. M. tuberculosis antigens could not be recognized by immune cells from all TB patients because of the polymorphism of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system. Vaccine combining more than one antigen has the advantage of being recognized by extensive human populations. In addition, there is still the possibility that vaccine based solely on one antigen may select for M. tuberculosis that do not express the antigen so as to generate immune evasion. LT69 containing five M. tuberculosis antigens might be beneficial for vaccination of genetically diverse human populations and overcoming antigen presentation evasion [19, 20].
Since T-cell mediated immunity provides critical protective immune response against M. tuberculosis infection [21, 22], the prime goal of TB vaccine development is to elicit effective long-lasting memory T-cells which could respond quickly and strongly upon encounter with M. tuberculosis [22, 23]. It has been reported that low dose of antigen favors the induction of central memory T cells (TCM) while high dose of antigen tents to stimulate effector memory T cells (TEM) or effective T cells formation [14, 24–26]. BCG vaccine mainly induces TEM that survive for a shorter period of time than TCM [5], which may underlie the limited duration of BCG vaccine protection [6]. In this study, we found that 24 weeks following immunization, the 2 μg LT69 vaccinated mice generated significantly higher levels of IFN-γ than the mice received 10 μg and 50 μg of the vaccine (p < 0.01), whereas the difference was not observed 6 weeks post immunization. Furthermore, thirty weeks post vaccination, low-dose LT69 (2 μg/dose) vaccination resulted in a 1.15 ± 0.09 log10 CFU reduction in lungs compared with PBS control, better than high-dose LT69 (0.85 ± 0.03 log10 CFU reduction) and BCG vaccine (0.53 ± 0.06 log10 CFU reduction). However, the differences in spleens among the groups of low-dose LT69 (1.01 ± 0.02 log10 CFU reduction), high-dose LT69 (0.78 ± 0.22 log10 CFU reduction) and BCG vaccine (0.89 ± 0.12 log10 CFU reduction) were not obvious. The reason might be that there are different memory T cell populations induced in different tissues following vaccines immunization. In addition, we challenged mice through respiratory tract, the bacteria load in lungs represents the protective effect against the aerosol attack, while the bacteria load in spleens might represent the protective effect against bacteria transmitted to spleen tissues through blood. These results suggested that low-dose of LT69 immunization generated more long-term T cell responses and consequently induced better protective efficacy than high-dose of LT69 and BCG vaccine in lung. In consistent with this,relative low dosage of other TB vaccine or vaccine candidate, such as BCG [27] and H56 [28], were reported to induce more stable, protective immunity than high dosages. The reason might be that low dosages of vaccine induced development of TCM that led to long-term and high protection [14]. A recent study also reported that the recombinant BCG ΔureC::hly vaccine-induced TCM played the critical role on its long-term protection against pulmonary TB [6]. The dose related protective effect and mechanism were also verified in infection of other pathogens, such as influenza virus [24], simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) [29], and Leishmania major [30].
In summary, multistage subunit vaccine LT69 consisting five antigens had strong immunogenicity and high protective efficacy against M. tuberculosis. Low-dose of LT69 generated long-term immune memory responses and showed higher protective efficacy against M. tuberculosis infection than BCG did at 30 weeks post vaccination. These findings have implications for design of new effective TB vaccines and vaccination regimens in the future.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Major Science and Technology Projects [2012ZX10003-008-006; http://www.nmp.gov.cn]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470895; 81072499; http://www.nsfc.gov.cn] and Doctoral Fund from Ministry of Education of China [20120211110038; http://www.cutech.edu.cn/cn/index.htm]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Eurosurveillance editorial team. WHO publishes global tuberculosis report 2013. Euro surveill. 2013;18(43). . [PubMed]
- 2. Simpson S, Marshall E. Immune control, memory, and vaccines. Science. 2001;293(5528):233 10.1126/science.293.5528.233 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sterne JA, Rodrigues LC, Guedes IN. Does the efficacy of BCG decline with time since vaccination? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998;2(3):7 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Andersen P, Doherty TM. The success and failure of BCG—implications for a novel tuberculosis vaccine. Nature reviews Microbiology. 2005;3(8):656–62. 10.1038/nrmicro1211 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kaveh DA, Bachy VS, Hewinson RG, Hogarth PJ. Systemic BCG immunization induces persistent lung mucosal multifunctional CD4 T(EM) cells which expand following virulent mycobacterial challenge. PloS one. 2011;6(6):e21566 10.1371/journal.pone.0021566 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vogelzang A, Perdomo C, Zedler U, Kuhlmann S, Hurwitz R, Gengenbacher M, et al. Central memory CD4 T cells are responsible for superior protection against tuberculosis of the recombinant Bacillus Calmette-Guerin DeltaureC::hly vaccine. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2014. 10.1093/infdis/jiu347 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7. Kaech SM, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R. Effector and memory T-cell differentiation: implications for vaccine development. Nature reviews Immunology. 2002;2(4):251–62. 10.1038/nri778 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Doherty TM, Dietrich J, Billeskov R. Tuberculosis subunit vaccines: from basic science to clinical testing. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2007;7(10):1539–49. 10.1517/14712598.7.10.1539 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Billeskov R, Elvang TT, Andersen PL, Dietrich J. The HyVac4 subunit vaccine efficiently boosts BCG-primed anti-mycobacterial protective immunity. PloS one. 2012;7(6):e39909 10.1371/journal.pone.0039909 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. McShane H, Pathan AA, Sander CR, Goonetilleke NP, Fletcher HA, Hill AV. Boosting BCG with MVA85A: the first candidate subunit vaccine for tuberculosis in clinical trials. Tuberculosis. 2005;85(1–2):47–52. 10.1016/j.tube.2004.09.015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Billeskov R, Christensen JP, Aagaard C, Andersen P, Dietrich J. Comparing adjuvanted H28 and modified vaccinia virus ankara expressingH28 in a mouse and a non-human primate tuberculosis model. PloS one. 2013;8(8):e72185 10.1371/journal.pone.0072185 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kaech SM, Ahmed R. Memory CD8+ T cell differentiation: initial antigen encounter triggers a developmental program in naive cells. Nature immunology. 2001;2(5):415–22. 10.1038/87720 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mercado R, Vijh S, Allen SE, Kerksiek K, Pilip IM, Pamer EG. Early programming of T cell populations responding to bacterial infection. Journal of immunology. 2000;165(12):6833–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.6833 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Shen CH, Talay O, Mahajan VS, Leskov IB, Eisen HN, Chen J. Antigen-bearing dendritic cells regulate the diverse pattern of memory CD8 T-cell development in different tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(52):22587–92. 10.1073/pnas.1016350108 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Aagaard C, Hoang T, Dietrich J, Cardona PJ, Izzo A, Dolganov G, et al. A multistage tuberculosis vaccine that confers efficient protection before and after exposure. Nature medicine. 2011;17(2):189–U224. 10.1038/Nm.2285 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Xin Q, Niu H, Li Z, Zhang G, Hu L, Wang B, et al. Subunit vaccine consisting of multi-stage antigens has high protective efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. PloS one. 2013;8(8):e72745 10.1371/journal.pone.0072745 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Niu H, Hu L, Li Q, Da Z, Wang B, Tang K, et al. Construction and evaluation of a multistage Mycobacterium tuberculosis subunit vaccine candidate Mtb10.4-HspX. Vaccine. 2011;29(51):9451–8. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.032 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zhang Y. Advances in the treatment of tuberculosis. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2007;82(5):595–600. 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100362 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Dietrich J, Aagaard C, Leah R, Olsen AW, Stryhn A, Doherty TM, et al. Exchanging ESAT6 with TB10.4 in an Ag85B fusion molecule-based tuberculosis subunit vaccine: efficient protection and ESAT6-based sensitive monitoring of vaccine efficacy. Journal of immunology. 2005;174(10):6332–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6332 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Knudsen NP, Norskov-Lauritsen S, Dolganov GM, Schoolnik GK, Lindenstrom T, Andersen P, et al. Tuberculosis vaccine with high predicted population coverage and compatibility with modern diagnostics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(3):1096–101. 10.1073/pnas.1314973111 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cooper AM. Cell-mediated immune responses in tuberculosis. Annual review of immunology. 2009;27:393–422. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132703 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kaufmann SH. Recent findings in immunology give tuberculosis vaccines a new boost. Trends in immunology. 2005;26(12):660–7. 10.1016/j.it.2005.09.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A, Araki K, Ahmed R. From vaccines to memory and back. Immunity. 2010;33(4):451–63. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Castiglioni Paola, Gerloni Mara, Zanetti M. Genetically programmed B lymphocytes are highly efficient in inducing anti-virus protective immunity mediated by central memory CD8 T cells. vaccine. 2004;23(5):9 doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine. 2004.06.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Pope C, Kim SK, Marzo A, Masopust D, Williams K, Jiang J, et al. Organ-specific regulation of the CD8 T cell response to Listeria monocytogenes infection. Journal of immunology. 2001;166(5):3402–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.5.3402 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Badovinac VP, Porter BB, Harty JT. Programmed contraction of CD8(+) T cells after infection. Nature immunology. 2002;3(7):619–26. 10.1038/ni804 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bretscher PA. Prospects for low dose BCG vaccination against tuberculosis. Immunobiology. 1994;191(4–5):548–54. 10.1016/S0171-2985(11)80461-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Aagaard C, Hoang T, Dietrich J, Cardona PJ, Izzo A, Dolganov G, et al. A multistage tuberculosis vaccine that confers efficient protection before and after exposure. Nature medicine. 2011;17(2):189–94. 10.1038/nm.2285 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hel Z, Venzon D, Poudyal M, Tsai WP, Giuliani L, Woodward R, et al. Viremia control following antiretroviral treatment and therapeutic immunization during primary SIV251 infection of macaques. Nature medicine. 2000;6(10):1140–6. 10.1038/80481 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zaph C, Uzonna J, Beverley SM, Scott P. Central memory T cells mediate long-term immunity to Leishmania major in the absence of persistent parasites. Nature medicine. 2004;10(10):1104–10. 10.1038/nm1108 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.