Abstract
Membrane receptor-sensed input signals affect and modulate intracellular protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Consequent changes occur to the compositions of protein complexes, protein localization and intermolecular binding affinities. Alterations of compartmentalized PPIs emanating from certain deregulated kinases are implicated in the manifestation of diseases such as cancer. Here we describe the application of a genetically encoded Protein-fragment Complementation Assay (PCA) based on the Renilla Luciferase (Rluc) enzyme to compare binary PPIs of the spatially and temporally controlled protein kinase A (PKA) network in diverse eukaryotic model systems. The simplicity and sensitivity of this cell-based reporter allows for real-time recordings of mutually exclusive PPIs of PKA upon activation of selected endogenous G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in cancer cells, xenografts of mice, budding yeast, and zebrafish embryos. This extends the application spectrum of Rluc PCA for the quantification of PPI-based receptor-effector relationships in physiological and pathological model systems.
Most signal transduction pathways transmit receptor-mediated input signals through a relay of intracellular signaling events. Signals are sensed and converted by defined cell surface receptors and are transmitted through cytoplasmic and nuclear effector molecules. This leads to signal amplification and uncoupling as well as feed-forward and feed-back regulation, which are based amongst others on oscillations of second messenger levels and on modulations of dynamic protein-protein interactions (PPIs). These PPIs connect signaling cascades and participate in the co-ordination of the plethora of extracellular stimuli to convert them into physiological but also pathological responses within cells1,2. Deregulated upstream signaling and mutations in kinases and their regulatory proteins alter spatially controlled PPIs which account for kinases-induced carcinogenesis3,4,5,6,7. One of the best studied example for an evolutionarily conserved small molecule sensor and dynamic PPI is the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA). PKA acts as a compartmentalized signaling hub of multiple signaling cascades and is therefore a central regulator and effector of homeostatic and metabolic control8. It is the classic downstream effector of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) which are among the most common targets of therapeutic drug development9,10,11. PKA is targeted to diverse subcellular locations through PPIs with diverse A-kinase anchor proteins (AKAPs), which is a precondition for spatially and temporally controlled PKA-substrate phosphorylation8,12. Activation of compartmentalized PKA pools is dependent on direct binding of the second messenger cAMP to PKA regulatory subunits type I (RI) or II (RII). cAMP binding triggers dissociation and activation of PKA catalytic subunits (PKAc). Nuclear PKAc subunits are specifically inhibited through the protein kinase inhibitor peptide (PKI), which binds to and exports PKAc from the nucleus13,14,15. Deregulation of cAMP/PKA functions contribute to the manifestation of diseases such as cancer. Distinct R or PKAc kinase gene mutations/fusions provoke permanent PKAc activation which participate in disease etiology and progression. As examples, mutations in RIa and PKAc account for the generation of endocrine tumors and chimeric fusions with PKAc have been linked to hepatocellular carcinoma7,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24.
To detect and systematically map changes of PPIs involved in aberrant signal transmission, easily adaptable assays are needed. Such PPI reporters would be valuable for genetic or pharmacological studies in different cell- or organism-based model systems. In particular, the identification of upstream regulators, patient mutations, and/or specific molecules that affect PPIs are required to understand and target the pathological cell condition, specifically PPIs emanating from GTPases and kinases4,16,25,26. A simple PPI reporter assay that can be used in different model systems would be convenient for drug discovery in several respects. Besides the quantification of selected wild type and mutationally modified protein complexes, the same PPIs could serve as reporter and quantitative read-out for upstream enzyme or receptor activities.
However, time-resolved quantification of dynamic PPI in living cells and across model organisms is often limited due to the complexity of the biosensor systems needed to study them. Existing methods, such as those based on fluorescence and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (FRET, BRET) are technologically challenging, they have a narrow dynamic range, and the interpretation of the results of such experiments is demanding, especially in living subjects27,28,29,30.
We have advanced a highly specific Renilla Luciferase (Rluc) Protein-fragment Complementation Assay (PCA)31,32,33,34,35 to systematically map explicit features of defined PPIs in vivo. We show that precise and time-dependent quantifications of dynamic PPIs are easily adaptable to applications in any cell, tissue, or organism. Moreover, we illustrate that an advanced PPI reporter platform based on mutually exclusive binary interactions of PKA can be applied to analyze PPI dynamics following activation of endogenous GPCR pathways in different model systems.
Results
Biosensor design and preferable features of the Rluc PCA-based PPI reporter are shown in Fig. 1. Genetically encoded Rluc PCAs are applied to quantification and characterization of dynamic PPIs in real time and in vivo. The impact of perturbations of binary PPIs and upstream factors can be determined quantitatively. Specifications of PPI dynamics offer the possibility to be used for functional cellular read outs, for example of oncogenic PPI and receptor-effector interactions. It is desirable to quantify differential PPIs in distinct eukaryotic model systems to investigate physiological and pathological cell states.
Here we tested the impact of distinct perturbations of proteins and/or receptor pathways (GPCRs) on defined molecular interactions using an extended PPI reporter platform. We analyzed unique properties of oncogenic bait-protein interactions with exchangeable prey proteins in cell culture and in diverse model organisms. For this purpose we constructed new Rluc PCA pairs to assess differential PPI. We selected PPI pairs of the binary and compartmentalized PKA network (Fig. 2A).
The first step was generation and benchmarking of highly selective Rluc PCA pairs from the dynamic PKA network, which we subjected to cell and organism-based perturbation studies (Fig. 2A). Originally we reported the engineering of the Rluc PCA PPI reporter consisting of PKAc and cAMP-sensing RIIb subunits. In the initial study we showed quantifications of PPI dynamics in different cell lines33. To understand the mechanism of complex formation of PKAc we generated new PCA pairs with differentially localized phosphotransferase inhibitors, such as RIa and PKI (Fig. 2B). GPCR-controlled cAMP-mobilization is sensed by differentially localized R subunits bound to PKAc. cAMP-binding to R leads to dissociation and activation of PKAc12. In addition to cAMP-degradation and re-association of the PKA holoenzyme12,36, PKI binding to nuclear PKAc represents another mechanism of A-kinase phosphotransferase inhibition15 (Fig. 2A). Following C-terminal tagging with Rluc PCA fragments we compared dimerization of homo- and heterodimers of PKA. Genetically encoded bait-F[1] and prey-F[2] hybrid-constructs were transiently over-expressed in HEK293 cells. Besides RIa and RIIb homodimers, we observed complex formation of heterodimers of PKAc with RIa, RIIb and PKI. We assume that the low dimerization signals of RIa:RIa compared to RIIb:RIIb originate from differences in the tetrameric RIIb:PKAc and RIa:PKAc holoenzyme structures12 and thus suboptimal orientation of the Rluc PCA fragments for complementation. No significant PPIs of R subunits heterodimers and R:PKI interactions were evident (Fig. 2B). The dotted line is aligned with the signal for co-expressed RIa and RIIb Rluc PCA constructs indicating the arbitrary background signal. Comparable expression levels of the hybrid proteins tagged with Rluc F[1] were observed (Fig. 2C).
The prime targets for pharmaceutical intervention are membrane receptors, and GPCRs are the largest superfamily of cell surface molecules involved in signal transmission. A large portion of these GPCRs couple to cAMP-mobilization9,11,37. We set out to activate defined endogenous receptor cascades first in defined cell settings and then in various model organisms.
The prototypical GPCR coupled to cAMP production is the beta adrenergic receptor family (βAR). Activation of different βAR subtypes are related to proliferation, cardiac function, and memory and learning37,38,39,40,41. We chose the human osteosarcoma cell line U2OS (which exclusively expresses β2ARs) for the first perturbation experiments of cellular cAMP-levels33. We tested how β2AR-mediated cAMP-production affects binary PPIs of the PKA network (Fig. 3A). We activated endogenous β2AR in U2OS cells with the non-selective beta adrenergic agonist isoproterenol. Following overexpression of indicated Rluc PCA pairs we observed that nM concentrations of isoproterenol are sufficient to induce type I and type II PKA activation, indicated by a decrease of PPI/bioluminescence. Activation of β2ARs for 15 min has no impact on the RII dimer and on PKAc:PKI interactions (Fig. 3B).
Following analyses of PKA dynamics upon activation of G-alpha-s coupled receptor cascades we benchmarked features of the Rluc PCA, first in intact cells and subsequently in model organisms. We decided to focus our efforts on cytoplasmatic localized RIIb:PKAc interactions33. Genetically encoded RIIb-F[1] and PKAc-F[2] hybrid-constructs were transiently over-expressed in HEK293 cells. Within two hours of transfection we detected luminescence resulting from the PPI reporter. Addition of forskolin triggered dissociation of the PKA complex, which resulted in a disruption of the RIIb:PKAc complex and spontaneous unfolding of the Rluc PCA reporter, and thus a decreased luminescence signal (Fig. 4A). Next, we quantitatively measured PPIs in a time-dependent manner. Four hours of transient over-expression of the reporter was sufficient to detect dynamic PPIs (Fig. 4A). However, at this stage, expression of the Rluc PCA could not be tracked using immuno-blotting (Fig. 4B). Six-fold prolongation of the expression-time caused a 417-fold increase of the PPI signal (24 h). Consequently, quantification of PKA Rluc PCA reporter (henceforth, the PKA reporter) was possible at varying expression levels of the reporter, when compared with those of the endogenous proteins, RIIb and PKAc respectively (Fig. 4B). Next we performed quantitative, dose-dependent measurements of PPIs with intact HEK293 cells in a 1536-well plate format to show that we could adapt this system for high throughput screenings (HTS). We illustrate that the simplicity and sensitivity of the Rluc PCA allows simultaneous recordings of dose-dependent effects of forskolin on the PKA reporter in a feasible short time-frame (less than 10 min) for treatment and measurements (Fig. 4C).
We then used the Rluc PCA PKA assay as a reporter to measure activation of distinct GPCRs. For this we employed HEK293 cells that express low levels of endogenous β2ARs38,42. Using a reporter cell line with stable expression of the PKA biosensor we recorded a transient dissociation of the RII:PKAc complex (within a 10 minute time interval) upon treatment with isoproterenol (Fig. 5A).
We next tested the PKA reporter in xenografts of living mice43. Genetically modified HEK293 cells stably expressing the Rluc PCA-based PKA reporter were subcutaneously engrafted into host mice. Non-invasive imaging in vivo of PKA biosensor-generated luminescence from the tumor xenografts indicated formation of PKA complexes under basal conditions. We tested application of the PKA reporter to analyze endogenous GPCR activity. We recorded GPCR-triggered PKA activities (in time- and dose-dependent manner) following intra-venous (i.v.) administration of isoproterenol and the βAR antagonist alprenolol, and showed that the dynamic PKA reporter immediately responded to elevations in endogenous βAR activities. Time-resolved imaging of PKA activity further illustrated that βAR activity could be reversed by subsequent treatment with the non-selective βAR antagonist alprenolol (Fig. 5B). In comparison, administration of 0.9% saline showed no significant impact on PKA activation, (P = 0,0014; Supplementary Figure S1). To exclude the possibility that isoproterenol might directly affect the luminescent signal output, we tested HEK293 xenografts expressing the full length Rluc. I.v. administration of isoproterenol did not cause a decrease in Rluc-mediated luminescent signals (Supplementary Figure S2). These experiments demonstrate that the compounds injected into the blood stream of the mouse reached the xenograft and affected the PKA reporter through modulation of endogenous GPCRs in measureable time-intervals of minutes.
To demonstrate its broad applicability, we applied the PKA reporter to two other widely used model systems. We first analyzed the suitability of a simple but genetically well defined eukaryote, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Studies of dynamic PPIs using enzymatic biosensors are limited in these cells due to their thick cell wall and low expression levels of PPI reporters. We chose S. cerevisae for two reasons: first it contains endogenous GPCR pathways (e.g. the glucose sensing Gpr1); second, GPCR pathways in budding yeast are linked to cAMP-elevation and PKA activation. PKA is highly conserved and in the yeast is composed of one regulatory (Bcy1) and three paralogous catalytic subunits (Tpk1-3)44,45 (Fig. 6A). High conservation at the protein level prompted us to try the same tagging strategy as for the mammalian Rluc PCA based PKA sensor to generate a congruent yeast reporter system (Supplementary Figure S3). In parallel, we also generated the Venus-YFP PCA based PKA reporter to localize PKA complexes in yeast35,46. In Fig. 6B we show the subcellular localization of Venus-PCA tagged yeast PKA subunits (Tpk2-V[1]:Bcy1-V[2]) in budding yeast with a localized punctate pattern. We also over-expressed several Rluc PCA based hybrid proteins. As a positive control for detection of PPI, we expressed Rluc PCA tagged PDZ domains of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and aSyntrophin (aSyn), that are exogenous to yeast and known to form heterodimers47,48. Over-expression of Rluc PCA fragment tagged nNOS:aSyn and Tpk2:Bcy1 showed a significant luminescence signal in comparison to indicated controls and the wild type MATa yeast strain without any PCA fragment. Next, we treated cells with glucose following growth in galactose to activate the GPCR glucose sensor Gpr1. In comparison with the galactose control experiment, we observed that activation of Gpr1 through glucose triggered activation of the Rluc PCA based PKA reporter (Fig. 6C). These data underline the suitability of the Rluc PCA for studying dynamic PPIs in budding yeast.
Finally, we tested the Rluc PCA PKA reporter in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos, a widely used vertebrate developmental model system, which has recently also been adapted for drug discovery purposes, particularly to screen for molecules that act on the common GPCR family of receptors 10,11,49,50,51,52,. GPCR pathways play critical roles at different stages of development (e.g. Wnt signaling, Hedgehog, and chemokine signaling)9,10,53,54,55. We attempted to determine if embryos respond to external activation of βARs and if direct activation of adenylyl cyclases (ACs) is detectable using our reporter system. Over the course of a 24 h time frame, a variety of developmental stages of fertilized zebrafish embryos can be distinguished (Fig. 7A). First, we showed that injection of equal amounts of mRNA encoding the Rluc PCA-based PKA reporter constructs (RII-F[1]:PKAc-F[2]) did not affect embryo development by morphological criteria (Fig. 7A). We focused on stages between 3 and 24 hours post fertilization (hpf). After removing the chorion, embryos were subjected to Rluc PCA measurements. We observed PKA originating Rluc PCA signal decrease with time (Fig. 7B). After removing the chorion we treated embryos either with forskolin or isoproterenol for five and 30 min followed by Rluc PCA analyses. In comparison to the controls, we observed changes in PKA reporter signal. Both forskolin and isoproterenol treatment triggered PKA activation in the embryos at the 8 hpf stage (Fig. 7C). Also after 24 h hpf it was possible to analyze dynamic PPIs (Supplementary Figure S4). These data indicate that for elaborated PPI studies in the zebrafish model system it will be necessary to generate transgenic animals. These experiments indicate that Rluc PCA-based reporters are suitable for analysis of dynamic PPIs at different embryological stages of zebrafish embryos. This can be also useful for real-time recordings of defined receptor-regulated PPIs in and between developmental stages using either wild type or specific disease-relevant mutant strains. The PKA activity status is controlled through a variety of cAMP linked GPCRs which are prime targets for drug discovery10,11,39,53,54,55,56. Therefore the PKA reporter can be adapted to studies on pharmaceutically relevant and endogenously expressed GPCRs in the zebrafish model. It is therefore suitable to test small-molecules acting on GPCRs in this model through both Gαs- and Gαi-coupled receptors that exist in zebrafish. Several small molecules act on these receptors and their discovery have resulted in preclinical and clinical trials10. One major advantage of the zebrafish embryos is that the efficacies of small molecules targeting PKA-linked pathways can be assessed. Simultaneously a phenotypic toxicology profile can be applied, potentially accelerating drug discovery.
Discussion
In this study, we have illustrated the general utility of the Rluc PCA reporter to study PPI dynamics in selected model organisms that are used in current biomedical research.
The simplicity and sensitivity of the PPI reporter enables systematic protein complex quantifications in real time, using a simple and straight forward protocol. The PKA reporter is functional at expression levels far below endogenous protein expression levels (the Rluc PCA was not detectable in the immunoblotting experiment, Fig. 4B), due to extremely high signal to background levels. This is desirable for studies on model organisms because it reduces the potential impact of ectopic protein expression on cell homeostasis. Dynamics of the studied PPIs reflect linkage to upstream receptor pathways. In the context of drug efficacies and timing, the PPI reporter allows for accurate and quantitative specification of receptor-effector relationships directly in the preferred cell type or model organism. The design of further PCA-based biosensors at different stages within cascades and between critical hubs of lead molecules signal transmission will facilitate the identification of signaling crosstalk and related OFF-target effects of lead molecules57. Existing PPI reporter based on FRET or BRET58,59,60 are technologically challenging to implement. We show that with a simple Rluc PCA protocol PPI quantification of cell populations in high content format is possible with standard lab equipment. Moreover, we illustrate that the Rluc PCA is a robust readout for PPI even at expression levels far below the endogenous bait and prey proteins. It is the high signal-to background ratio which permits a more accurate detection of PPI dynamics in different in vivo settings. However, structural information is helpful to generate a functional Rluc PCA reporter. For BRET and FRET reporter, the distance between the bait and prey and their orientation is critical for energy transfer to take place. For the PCA reporter it is more restrictive, the fragments need to be brought into close proximity to allow complementation of functional reporter activity. Without knowledge of the binding domains, the size of bait and prey proteins is the critical factor for Rluc PCA design33,35. Referring to this, knowledge of the structural constraints of PPI interfaces is helpful to construct a functional reporter. In addition, the luminescence signal lifetime and low photon emission rates limit the applicability of the Rluc PCA reporter for single cell studies.
Taking these aspects of Rluc PCA reporter design and measurements into account, we generated a Rluc PCA platform for analyses of mutually exclusive PPIs of the PKA network. In light of disease relevant RIa and PKAc variations (mutations, fusions, decontrolled upstream pathways)7,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 application of the PKA Rluc PCA platform offers the possibility to systematically test different means of kinase perturbations using the available biosensor toolbox. We quantified mutually exclusive PKAc interactions which account for different spatially controlled cell functions.
We also highlight that Rluc PCA analyses of dynamic PPIs are not restricted to specific cell types. We recorded PPI dynamics in three different model organisms, and envision the development of more wide-ranging intracellular reporter platforms. One remarkable finding of this study was the acquisition of real-time recordings of receptor-controlled PPI dynamics in xenografts of living mice. We show that even i.v. administration of counteracting small molecules, which act on endogenously existing GPCRs, show an immediate (time frame of minutes) and opposing impact on PPIs in the xenografts. In addition, we tested PPIs in budding yeast and zebrafish embryos. We showed that in zebrafish embryos, endogenous GPCR activities can be tracked over time, which extends the application spectrum for drug discovery. This long time-frame detection would allow for both testing of lead compound targeting with simultaneous applications of phenotypic toxicity tests.
In several studies, we have elaborated possible applications of the Rluc-based PCA for defined functional read-outs in cell culture systems45,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68. Now, such PPI-encoded functions can be directly quantified and recorded in the model organism of choice. In addition to measurements of GPCR, kinase and phosphodiesterase activities, PKA-related ubiquitination assays could to be feasible33,62,63. The presented Rluc PCA based biosensor platform opens new perspectives to analyze the impact of environmental conditions and lead compounds sensed by membrane receptors on intracellular PPI networks. Here we show that this can be analyzed directly in the favorable model organism, which is a suitable new way to study signaling cross-talk and to quantify drug efficacies in a time-dependent manner.
Materials and Methods
Renilla luciferase PCA
Constructs: The Rluc PCA based hybrid proteins RIIb–F[1] and PKAc-F[2] have been designed as previously described33. Rluc PCA fusions with PKI and RIa have been generated using an analogous cloning approach. Following PCR amplification of human RIa (alpha) (protein accession number: NP_002725.1) and PKI alpha (protein accession number: AAA72716; addgene plasmid # 45066)69 we fused them C-terminally with either F[1] or F[2] of the Rluc PCA. PPI measurements: HEK293 and U2OS cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. We transiently overexpressed indicated versions of the Rluc PCA based biosensor in 24 or 12 well plate formats. One, 2,4 ,24 or 48 hours post-transfection we exchanged growth medium and resuspended cells in PBS. We scraped down the cells in case of the U2OS cells. Cell suspensions were transferred to 96-well plates and subjected to luminescence analysis using the LMaxTM-II-384 luminometer (Molecular Devices). Rluc luminescence signals were integrated for 10 seconds following addition of the Rluc substrate benzyl-coelenterazine (5 μM; Nanolight)33. Dose-dependent effects of forskolin exposure on PPI-mediated luminescence signals were measured simultaneously in 1536-well plate format. Detached HEK293 cells transiently expressing the PKA reporter were treated for 5 min with increasing concentrations of forskolin in 1.5 ml test tubes. Immediately after forskolin exposure (5 min) aliquots of cells (+5 μM benzyl-coelenterazine) were transferred to a 1536 well plate and the luminescence was captured for 30 sec on the Fusion imaging platform (Biorad).
Yeast Rluc-PCA reporter construction
All constructs are plasmid based and candidate genes are expressed in fusion with either Venus or Rluc PCA fragments under constitutive ADH or TEF promoter. To create the constructs, TPK2 and BCY1 gene open reading frames were PCR amplified from yeast genomic DNA and respectively cloned into the plasmids p413-linker-VenusF[1], p415-linker-VenusF[2] (for Venus PCA) and p413-linker-RlucF[1], p415-linker-RlucF[2] (for Rluc PCA) using SpeI and BamHI restriction enzymes 5’ to the linker. As positive control for detection of PPI, nNOS and aSyn PDZ domain DNA sequences were PCR-amplified from template DNAs (a kind gift from W.A. Lim, UC San Francisco) and cloned into p41NAT-linker-RlucF[1] and p41HPH-linker-RlucF[2] plasmids, respectively, between XbaI and BspEI sites located 5’ to the linker. PDZ-linker-Rluc PCA fragment fusions were expressed from a plasmid under the control of the TEF promoter. These result in plasmids p41NAT-nNOS-RlucF[1] and pHPH-aSyn-RlucF[2], respectively47.
Yeast PCA reporter measurements
Plasmids containing the appropriate candidate genes were either singly or co-transformed into competent MATa haploid yeast cells using the standard Lithium acetate method. Positive clones were selected on the synthetic complete media lacking Histidine (His) (p413 constructs) and Leucine (Leu) (p415 constructs) either as single or double drop out selection. The nNOS and aSyn positive clones were selected using either Clonat or Hygromycin antibiotic resistance, respectively. Single positive clones were grown overnight in low fluorescent media containing galactose to make a pre-culture. From the pre-culture, cells were diluted into fresh media at 0.05OD600 and continued to grow in low florescent galactose media until 0.1OD600. To detect the Tpk2 interaction with Bcy1 using Venus PCA cells grown in low florescent galactose media were plated onto black multi-well plates precoated with Concanavalin A, allowed to settle for 10 minutes and imaged using a Nikon Eclipse TE2000U inverted microscope (Nikon) with 60X oil objective and DIC or YFP filter cube (41028, Chroma Technologies). Images were captured with a CoolSnap CCD camera (Photometrics) using MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices). The PPI signals using Rluc PCA were measured using cells equivalent to 0.1OD600 (approximately 1 × 106 cells). Cells were grown in low fluorescent media with appropriate selection. For each sample, cells equivalent to 0.1OD600 were spun, supernatant was discarded and cells were re-suspended in 160 μl of fresh medium. Cells were transferred to white 96-well flat bottom plates. The Luciferase substrate benzyl-coelenterazine (Nanolight #301) was diluted from the stock (2 mM in absolute ethanol) using 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH7.2, containing 1 mM EDTA. Glucose was diluted to 1 μM from 2 M stock using 1x PBS. LMax II384 Luminometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was used to measure the Rluc PCA signal. Using the internal injectors of the luminometer, 20 μl each of diluted benzyl-coelenterazine (to a final concentration of 10 μM) and glucose (to a final concentration of 100 mM) were added to the cell mixture, mixed by shaking and incubated for 60 seconds. After incubation, the Rluc PCA signal was integrated for 30 seconds. In a single experiment, for each sample the signal was measured in triplicates and in total, experiments were repeated independently three times47.
Mouse xenografts
1 × 107 HEK293 cells stably co-expressing the PCA hybrid proteins RII-F[1] and PKAc-F[2] were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of 9–10 week-old female athymic NCr-nu/nu mice (NCI Frederick). After 16 days, animals were imaged by the IVIS 200 system (Perkin Elmer). From 10 min after the intra-peritoneal (i.p.) injection of 1.2 mg/kg native coelenterazine, the animals were serially imaged under 2.0–2.5% isoflurane anesthesia every 2–5 min. When luminescence signal reached plateau, the animals were injected intravenously with 2.4 mg/kg isoproterenol. 7–8 min later the animals were injected intravenously with 8.0 mg/kg alprenolol. All mouse animal studies were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee.
Zebrafish embryos
RIIb-F[1] and PKAc-F[2] mRNA was generated using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Transcription Kit (Life Technologies), and 200 pg of each mRNA was microinjected into one cell stage zebrafish embryos. Embryos were raised at 28 °C until 3, 6, 8, 9.5 or 24 hpf, dechorionated and subjected to pharmacological treatments (Forskolin, 50 μM; Isoproterenol, 10 μM) at 28 °C for five and 30 minutes. Immediately afterwards, we resuspended the embryos and subjected the intact cells to luminescence measurements. All zebrafish experimental protocols were approved by the Austrian Ministry for Science and Research (GZ BMWF-66.008/0019-II/3b/2013), and experiments were carried out in accordance with approved guidelines
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Röck, R. et al In-vivo detection of binary PKA network interactions upon activation of endogenous GPCRs. Sci. Rep 5, 11133; doi: 10.1038/srep11133 (2015).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Sonja Geisler and Andrea Schraffl for technical and Gabi Reiter for management support. We thank Roland Huber for protein structure illustrations. This work was supported by grants from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF; P22608, P23652, P27606), Tyrolean Science Fund, Junior Researcher Support (University of Innsbruck).
Footnotes
Author Contributions ES conceived the project. RR, VB, HCB, MM, PR, JEM, PMT, PA and ES performed the experiments. RR, VB, HCB, MM, PR, JEM, PMT, KB, PA, MGP, SWM and ES analyzed the results. ES wrote the manuscript with contributions from MGP and SWM.
References
- Scott J. D. & Pawson T. Cell signaling in space and time: where proteins come together and when they’re apart. Science 326, 1220–4 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Good M. C., Zalatan J. G. & Lim W. A. Scaffold proteins: hubs for controlling the flow of cellular information. Science 332, 680–6 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rajakulendran T., Sahmi M., Lefrancois M., Sicheri F. & Therrien M. A dimerization-dependent mechanism drives RAF catalytic activation. Nature 461, 542–5 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephen A. G., Esposito D., Bagni R. K. & McCormick F. Dragging ras back in the ring. Cancer Cell 25, 272–81 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heidorn S. J. et al. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell 140, 209–21 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hynes N. E. & MacDonald G. ErbB receptors and signaling pathways in cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21, 177–84 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheung J. et al. Structural insights into mis-regulation of protein kinase A in human tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112, 1374–9 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott J. D., Dessauer C. W. & Tasken K. Creating order from chaos: cellular regulation by kinase anchoring. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 53, 187–210 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pierce K. L., Premont R. T. & Lefkowitz R. J. Seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3, 639–50 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lappano R. & Maggiolini M. G protein-coupled receptors: novel targets for drug discovery in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10, 47–60 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Hayre M. et al. The emerging mutational landscape of G proteins and G-protein-coupled receptors in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 13, 412–24 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor S. S., Ilouz R., Zhang P. & Kornev A. P. Assembly of allosteric macromolecular switches: lessons from PKA. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13, 646–58 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dalton G. D. & Dewey W. L. Protein kinase inhibitor peptide (PKI): a family of endogenous neuropeptides that modulate neuronal cAMP-dependent protein kinase function. Neuropeptides 40, 23–34 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walsh D. A., Ashby C. D., Gonzalez C., Calkins D. & Fischer E. H. Krebs EG: Purification and characterization of a protein inhibitor of adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate-dependent protein kinases. J Biol Chem 246, 1977–85 (1971). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott J. D., Fischer E. H., Demaille J. G. & Krebs E. G. Identification of an inhibitory region of the heat-stable protein inhibitor of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82, 4379–83 (1985). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stratakis C. A. cAMP/PKA signaling defects in tumors: genetics and tissue-specific pluripotential cell-derived lesions in human and mouse. Mol Cell Endocrinol 371, 208–20 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beuschlein F. et al. Constitutive activation of PKA catalytic subunit in adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 370, 1019–28 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goh G. et al. Recurrent activating mutation in PRKACA in cortisol-producing adrenal tumors. Nat Genet 46, 613–7 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato Y. et al. Recurrent somatic mutations underlie corticotropin-independent Cushing’s syndrome. Science 344, 917–20 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Espiard S., Ragazzon B. & Bertherat J. Protein kinase a alterations in adrenocortical tumors. Horm Metab Res 46, 869–75 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calebiro D. et al. PKA catalytic subunit mutations in adrenocortical Cushing’s adenoma impair association with the regulatory subunit. Nat Commun 5, 5680 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Dalmazi G. et al. Novel somatic mutations in the catalytic subunit of the protein kinase A as a cause of adrenal Cushing’s syndrome: a European multicentric study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99, E2093–100 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao Y. et al. Activating hotspot L205R mutation in PRKACA and adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. Science 344, 913–7 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Honeyman J. N. et al. Detection of a recurrent DNAJB1-PRKACA chimeric transcript in fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Science 343, 1010–4 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ivanov A. A., Khuri F. R. & Fu H. Targeting protein-protein interactions as an anticancer strategy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 34, 393–400 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Yang P. L. & Gray N. S. Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 9, 28–39 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De A., Jasani A., Arora R. & Gambhir S. S. Evolution of BRET Biosensors from Live Cell to Tissue-Scale Imaging. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 4, 131 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Audet M., Lagace M., Silversides D. W. & Bouvier M. Protein-protein interactions monitored in cells from transgenic mice using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. FASEB J 24, 2829–38 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnsson A. K. et al. The Rac-FRET Mouse Reveals Tight Spatiotemporal Control of Rac Activity in Primary Cells and Tissues. Cell Rep 6, 1153–64 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calebiro D. et al. Persistent cAMP-signals triggered by internalized G-protein-coupled receptors. PLoS Biol 7, e1000172 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luker K. E. et al. In vivo imaging of ligand receptor binding with Gaussia luciferase complementation. Nat Med 18, 172–7 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luker K. E. et al. Kinetics of regulated protein-protein interactions revealed with firefly luciferase complementation imaging in cells and living animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 12288–93 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stefan E. et al. Quantification of dynamic protein complexes using Renilla luciferase fragment complementation applied to protein kinase A activities in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 16916–21 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chan C. T. et al. Discovery and validation of small-molecule heat-shock protein 90 inhibitors through multimodality molecular imaging in living subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, E2476–85 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michnick S. W., Ear P. H., Manderson E. N., Remy I. & Stefan E. Universal strategies in research and drug discovery based on protein-fragment complementation assays. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6, 569–82 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houslay M. D. Underpinning compartmentalised cAMP signalling through targeted cAMP breakdown. Trends Biochem Sci 35, 91–100 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lefkowitz R. J. Seven transmembrane receptors: something old, something new. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 190, 9–19 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daaka Y., Luttrell L. M. & Lefkowitz R. J. Switching of the coupling of the beta2-adrenergic receptor to different G proteins by protein kinase A. Nature 390, 88–91 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thaker P. H. et al. Chronic stress promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis in a mouse model of ovarian carcinoma. Nat Med 12, 939–44 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wong W. & Scott J. D. AKAP signalling complexes: focal points in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5, 959–70 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Hupfeld C., Taylor S., Olefsky J. & Tsien R. Y. Insulin disrupts beta-adrenergic signalling to protein kinase A in adipocytes. Nature 437, 569–73 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedman J., Babu B. & Clark R. B. Beta(2)-adrenergic receptor lacking the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase consensus sites fully activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 in human embryonic kidney 293 cells: lack of evidence for G(s)/G(i) switching. Mol Pharmacol 62, 1094–102 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhang H. E., Gabrielson K. L., Laterra J., Fisher P. B. & Pomper M. G. Tumor-specific imaging through progression elevated gene-3 promoter-driven gene expression. Nat Med 17, 123–9 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffioen G. & Thevelein J. M. Molecular mechanisms controlling the localisation of protein kinase A. Curr Genet 41, 199–207 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stefan E. et al. PKA regulatory subunits mediate synergy among conserved G-protein-coupled receptor cascades. Nat Commun 2, 598 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manderson E. N., Malleshaiah M. & Michnick S. W. A novel genetic screen implicates Elm1 in the inactivation of the yeast transcription factor SBF. PLoS One 3, e1500 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malleshaiah M. K., Shahrezaei V., Swain P. S. & Michnick S. W. The scaffold protein Ste5 directly controls a switch-like mating decision in yeast. Nature 465, 101–5 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris B. Z., Hillier B. J. & Lim W. A. Energetic determinants of internal motifrecognition by PDZ domains. Biochemistry 40, 5921–30 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White R., Rose K. & Zon L. Zebrafish cancer: the state of the art and the path forward. Nat Rev Cancer 13, 624–36 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibert Y., Trengove M. C. & Ward A. C. Zebrafish as a genetic model in pre-clinical drug testing and screening. Curr Med Chem 20, 2458–66 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Das B.C., McCormick L., Thapa P., Karki R. & Evans T. Use of zebrafish in chemical biology and drug discovery. Future Med Chem 5, 2103–16 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty C., Hsu C.H., Wen Z.H., Lin C.S. & Agoramoorthy G. Zebrafish: a complete animal model for in vivo drug discovery and development. Curr Drug Metab 10, 116–24 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Briscoe J. & Therond P. P. The mechanisms of Hedgehog signalling and its roles in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14, 416–29 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clevers H. & Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell 149, 1192–205 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stuckemann T. et al. Zebrafish Cxcr4a determines the proliferative response to Hedgehog signalling. Development 139, 2711–20 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lappano R. & Maggiolini M. G protein-coupled receptors: novel targets for drug discovery in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10, 47–60 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald M. L. et al. Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells. Nat Chem Biol 2, 329–37 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alvarez-Curto E., Pediani J. D. & Milligan G. Applications of fluorescence and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to drug discovery at G protein coupled receptors. Anal Bioanal Chem 398, 167–80 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lohse M. J., Nuber S. & Hoffmann C. Fluorescence/bioluminescence resonance energy transfer techniques to study G-protein-coupled receptor activation and signaling. Pharmacol Rev 64, 299–336 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marullo S. & Bouvier M. Resonance energy transfer approaches in molecular pharmacology and beyond. Trends Pharmacol Sci 28, 362–5 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bachmann V. A. et al. Reciprocal regulation of PKA and Rac signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 8531–6 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lignitto L. et al. Proteolysis of MOB1 by the ubiquitin ligase praja2 attenuates Hippo signalling and supports glioblastoma growth. Nat Commun 4, 1822 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lignitto L. et al. Control of PKA stability and signalling by the RING ligase praja2. Nat Cell Biol 13, 412–22 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bachmann V. A., Bister K. & Stefan E. Interplay of PKA and Rac: Fine-tuning of Rac localization and signaling. Small GTPases 4, 247–51 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skoumbourdis A. P. et al. Exploration and optimization of substituted triazolothiadiazines and triazolopyridazines as PDE4 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19, 3686–92 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hart J. R. et al. Inhibitor of MYC identified in a Krohnke pyridine library. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 12556–61 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raffeiner P. et al. In vivo quantification and perturbation of Myc-Max interactions and the impact on oncogenic potential. Oncotarget 5, 8869–78 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Filteau M. et al. Systematic identification of signal integration by protein kinase A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 4501–6 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day R. N., Walder J. A. & Maurer R. A. A protein kinase inhibitor gene reduces both basal and multihormone-stimulated prolactin gene transcription. J Biol Chem 264, 431–6 (1989). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.