Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Jul;25(6):1086–1093. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000419

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Vulvar Cancer using Combined Radioactive and Fluorescence Guidance

Floris PR Verbeek 1,*, Quirijn RJG Tummers 1,*, Daphne DD Rietbergen 2, Alexander AW Peters 3, Boudewijn E Schaafsma 1, Cornelis JH van de Velde 1, John V Frangioni 4,5, Fijs WB van Leeuwen 2, Katja N Gaarenstroom 3, Alexander L Vahrmeijer 1
PMCID: PMC4478233  NIHMSID: NIHMS675446  PMID: 25768079

Abstract

Objective

Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging using Indocyanine Green (ICG) has recently been introduced to improve the SLN procedure. Several optical tracers have been successfully tested. However, the optimal tracer formulation is still unknown. This study evaluates the performance of ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid in relation to two most commonly used ICG-based formulas during SLN biopsy of vulvar cancer.

Methods/materials

12 women planned to undergo SLN biopsy for stage I vulvar cancer were prospectively included. SLN mapping was performed using the dual-modality radioactive and NIR fluorescence tracer ICG-99mTc-Nanocolloid. All patients underwent combined SLN localization using NIR fluorescence, and the (current) gold standard using blue dye and radioactive guidance.

Results

In all 12 patients at least one SLN was detected during surgery. A total of 21 lymph nodes (median 2, range 1 – 3) were resected. Median time between skin incision and first SLN detection was 8 (range 1 – 22) minutes. All resected SLNs were both radioactive and fluorescent, though only 13 of 21 SLN (62%) stained blue. Median brightness of exposed SLNs, expressed as SBR, was 5.4 (range 1.8 – 11.8). Lymph node metastases were found in 3 patients.

Conclusions

NIR fluorescence guided SLN mapping is feasible and outperforms blue dye staining. Premixing ICG with 99mTc-nanocolloid provides real-time intra-operative imaging of the SN and appears the optimal tracer combination in terms of intraoperative detection rate of the SN (100%). Moreover, ICG-99mTc-Nanocolloid allows administration of a 5-times lower injected dose of ICG (compared to ICG and ICG:HSA) and can be injected the up to 20h before surgery.

Keywords: Vulvar cancer, Image-Guided Surgery, Near-Infrared Fluorescence, Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping, Multimodal Imaging

INTRODUCTION

Lymph node involvement remains the most important prognostic factor for survival in women with vulvar cancer 1;2. The introduction of radical wide local excision or radical vulvectomy with inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy using separate groin incisions has significantly reduced morbidity compared to conventional radical vulvectomy with en bloc inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy 3. Nevertheless, up to two third of patients who underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy suffer from lymphedema 4-6. Because < 30% of patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009) stage I or II vulvar cancer have positive lymph nodes, lymphadenectomy appears unnecessary afterwards in the majority of patients 7-9. The introduction of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure has provided a less invasive algorithm to assess nodal staging 10. To date, the use of the SLN procedure has been validated in several large studies and is considered both safe and accurate in a selected group of patients 7;11. Moreover, it appears the most cost-effective strategy for the management of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer due to lower treatment costs and lower costs due to complications 12.

To locate the SLN, a combination of both radioactive tracers and blue dye is currently the gold standard 13. However both modalities have certain disadvantages. Despite the need for radiocolloids during preoperative planning, this technology gives only acoustic feedback intra-operatively and is unable to provide real-time visual guidance. Furthermore, blue dyes cannot be seen through skin and fatty tissue and can result in blue staining of the surgical field at the site of injection. Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) has recently been introduced to improve optical identification during the SLN procedure 14-16. NIR fluorescence imaging using Indocyanine green (ICG) has several characteristics that can be advantageous during the SLN procedure, including a relatively high tissue penetration and real-time optical guidance 17. ICG is approved for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and can be used off-label as a lymphatic tracer 14.

Feasibility of NIR fluorescence guided SLN biopsy in vulvar cancer has been previously demonstrated using several ICG-based tracer formulas 18-21. In these studies, multiple methods of tracer administration and dosages of ICG have been investigated. Crane et al. used ICG alone for SLN mapping in vulvar cancer (645 nmol ICG administered in 1 mL) and Hutteman et al. used several concentrations of ICG absorbed to human serum albumin (ICG:HSA) to improve SLN retention (800, 1200 and 1600 nmol ICG administered in 1.6 mL) 18;19.

Unfortunately, premixing with HSA, thereby increasing the hydrodynamic diameter to 7nm, did not improve performance compared to ICG alone 20. It was recently shown that premixing ICG with 99mTc-nanocolloid yields the hybrid tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid with hydrodynamic diameter 20-80 nm, that retains in SLNs similar to the particle which is used as standard-of-care radiotracer 99mTc-nanocolloid (64 mmol ICG administered in 0.4 mL) 22;23. This tracer has recently shown its value during gynecological SN resections in the groin 21, and during the highly similar procedures related to penile cancer 24

To summarize, several ICG-based formulations and injected volumes have been used, but despite preclinical comparison studies, no comparison between different tracers is available from the clinical setting. This study evaluates the use of ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid, a dual-modality radioactive and NIR fluorescence tracer. Subsequently results were compared to a previous performed randomized controlled trial in which two other different tracer formulations, ICG alone and ICG:HSA, were used in addition to the standard-of-care procedure using blue dye and radioactive guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical Trial

This clinical trial was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center and were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Women planned to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy for clinically FIGO stage I vulvar cancer and with clinically negative inguinofemoral nodes (determined by palpation and ultrasonography) were eligible for participation in the trials 25. Patients were enrolled in the study between January and October of 2013. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, lactation, or an allergy to iodine or ICG. All patients gave informed consent and were anonymized. The 12 patients included in the present study received ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid and have not previously been reported.

Tracer Preparation

ICG (25-mg vials) was purchased from Pulsion Medical Systems (Munich, Germany). ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid was purchased from GE Healthcare (Leiderdorp, the Netherlands). After tracer preparation ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid had a final activity of 60-100 MBq. The tracer was injected intracutaneously at 3 to 4 depots around the tumor or excision scar. In the ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid formulation, the ICG concentration was 161 μmol/l, leading to an injected ICG dose of 160 nmol in 1 mL (0.12 mg) 21;24;26.

All procedures were performed under current good manufacturing practice and under supervision of the institutional pharmacist.

Study Design

Patients received the standard-of-care SLN procedure using a combination of radioactive (99mTc-nanocolloid), patent blue, and fluorescence guidance 11;27.

The day before or the morning prior to surgery the combined tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid was injected at the department of nuclear medicine. In the operating room also 1 mL of patent blue V (Guerbet, France) was injected in all patients. SLN localization was also performed with patent blue V, as it is part of the standard-of-care for SLN mapping in the Netherlands. The tracers (radioactive, fluorescent and blue dye) were all injected intracutaneously at 3 or 4 sites around the tumor or excision scar in case of earlier excision biopsy of the tumor. In all patients, directly after injection of the radioactive tracer, a dynamic lymphoscintigraphy was made at the department of Nuclear Medicine (Symbia T6, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany or Toshiba GCA-7200pi/7200di/7100ui, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan). The sentinel node in the groin was marked on the skin using a waterproof marker. Directly following injection of the radioactive tracer and approximately 2 hours after injection, planar images were derived. In some patients SPECT/CT was performed on the two headed gamma camera (Symbia T6, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany with 6 slice CT).

SLN mapping was performed using the Mini-Fluorescence-Assisted Resection and Exploration (Mini-FLARE™) image-guided surgery system as described previously 27;28. The NIR fluorescence signal was measured percutaneously prior to skin incision, and continuously during the surgical procedure. Relative brightness of the SLNs was determined by measuring signal-to-background ratios (SBR) using customized imaging software 29. In all patients the SLN was defined on lymphoscintigraphy as the first node which received lymphatic drainage from the primary tumor 30. Intraoperatively, the lymph nodes were identified using acoustic feedback from the gamma probe. When the probe gave a gamma count of 10% or more compared to the most radioactive SLN, these nodes were also considered SLNs.

Excised SLNs were routinely analyzed by histopathological frozen section analysis. SLNs were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for hematoxylin, eosin, and immunohistopathological staining for AE1/AE3 at multiple levels, with an interval of 250 μm, according to the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V) study protocol 11. According to the study protocol a full inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was performed in case of tumor-positive frozen sections of the SLN showing macrometastases 2 mm or larger or in case the SN could not be found.

Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, SPSS statistical software (Version 20.0, Chicago, IL) was used. Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism Software (Version 5.01, La Jolla, CA). Correlation between Body Mass Index (BMI) and SLN identification time was determined using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. To compare patient characteristics the 1-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used. The 1-way ANOVA was corrected using Bonferroni correction in case of parametric data. For nonparametric data the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Data was tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Patient and Tumor Characteristics

Twelve consecutive patients with vulvar cancer who underwent SLN mapping using the combined tracer ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid were included in the current study. Median age of the patients was 72 years (range: 40 – 90) and median BMI was 24 kg/m2 (range: 17 - 30). Tumor characteristics are shown in table 1. The median tumor size and infiltration depth was 9 (range: 4 – 35) mm and 2.3 (range: 0.6 – 9) mm respectively. No adverse reactions associated with lymphatic tracer administration or the use of the Mini-FLARE™ imaging system were observed.

TABLE 1.

Patient and Tumor Characteristics

Characteristic ICG: 99mTc-Nanocoll (N = 12) ICG alone* (N = 12) ICG:HSA* (N = 12) Total (36 patients) P
Age (median; range) 72 (40 - 90) 77 (47 - 87) 69 (36 - 83) 71 (36 - 90) 0.23
Body mass index (median; range) 24 (17 - 30) 28 (24 - 40) 27 (21 - 35) 27 (21 - 40) 0.08
Primary tumor size in mm (median; range) 9 (4 -35) 18 (5 - 48) 20 (5 - 55) 16 (5 – 55) 0.28
Primary tumor infiltration depth in mm (median; range) 2.3 (0.6 – 9) 3.0 (1.5 - 27) 1.9 (1.3 -14) 2.5 (0.6 – 27) 0.24
Previous groin surgery 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 1 (8%) 4 (11%) 0.77

ICG:HSA, indocyanine green (ICG) adsorbed to human serum albumin (HSA)

*

Patients were previously reported in BJOG. 2013 May;120(6):758-64.

SLN Detection

The position of the SLN could be located during preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in all 12 patients (Figure 1). The SLN was located unilaterally in 4 patients and bilaterally in 8 patients (Table 2). Median time between ICG tracer injection and skin incision was 17 (range: 3 – 21) hours. Before incision, NIR fluorescence imaging enabled visualization of percutaneous lymphatic channels in 6 of 12 patients. A total of 21 SLNs (median of 2 per patient, range: 1 – 3) were resected. Median time between skin incision and first SLN detection was 8 (range: 1 – 22) minutes. During ex-vivo analysis, all these 21 nodes were all both radioactive and fluorescent, and 13 (62%) stained blue (Table 2). Fluorescent SLNs could be clearly identified as a bright green signal depicted in the overlay images (Figure 2 and supplementary video). Median brightness of exposed SLNs, expressed as SBR, was 5.4 (range: 1.8 – 11.8). Lymph node metastases were found in 4 out of 20 groins (3 patients), including 2 patients with macrometastases (> 2mm) and 1 patient with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases.

FIGURE 1. Preoperative SLN mapping.

FIGURE 1

Example of SLN mapping using lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT after administration of ICG:99mTc-nanocolloid. A: lymphoscintigraphy showing the injection spot and one SLN in the left groin. B, C, D and E: fused SPECT/CT images showing the position of the SLN in relation to patient anatomy. SLN= Sentinel Lymph node, inj.: Injection spot.

TABLE 2.

SLN Identification Results

Characteristic ICG: 99mTc-Nanocoll (12 patients) ICG Alone* (12 patients) ICG:HSA* (12 patients) Total (36 patients) P

Injected doses of ICG: 0.12mg in 1.0 mL 0.62 mg in 1.6 mL
Timing of injection: 3-21h before surgery Directly before surgery

N % N % N % N %

SLNs detected by lymphoscintigraphy
 Unilateral 4 42 8 67 6 50 19 53 0.48
 Bilateral 8 58 4 33 6 50 17 47

Intraoperative detection rate per patient 12 100 9 75 10 83 31 86 0.21

Number of SLNs identified 21 12 23 56

Method of SLN detection
 Radioactive 21 100 12 100 23 100 56 100 0.19
 Fluorescence 21 100 12 100 23 100 56 100
 Blue dye 13 62 11 92 16 70 40 71

Signal-to-background ratio (median; range) 5.4 (1.8 – 11.8) 10.6 (1.3 – 22.1) 10.1 (7.2 – 12.7) 8.4 (1.3 – 22.1) 0.02

Time between skin incision and first SLN detection in min. (median; range) 8 (1 -22) 12 (2 – 24) 7 (2 – 16) 8 (1 – 24) 0.79

Histology
 Negative 9 75 9 75 8 67 26 72 0.77
 ITC/micrometastases 1 8 2 17 1 8 4 11
 Macrometastases 2 17 1 8 3 25 6 17

H, Hours; ICG:HSA, indocyanine green (ICG) adsorbed to human serum albumin (HSA); SLN, sentinel lymph node; ITC, isolated tumor cells

*

Patients were previously reported in BJOG. 2013 May;120(6):758-64.

Detection rate combining NIR fluorescence imaging, the gamma probe, and blue dye staining

FIGURE 2. NIR fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping.

FIGURE 2

Intraoperative NIR fluorescence guided SLN mapping performed in the same patient as figure 1, using ICG:99mTc-nanocolloid. Top row, percutaneous NIR identification of afferent lymphatic channels flowing away from the injection site (Inj.). The planned incision site, based on the presumed location of the SLN, is shown as a dashed line. Middle row, real-time fluorescence identification of the SLN directly after incision. Bottom row, SLN resection under fluorescence guidance. Scale bars = 1 cm. Camera exposure times were: 100 msec (upper and middle row) and 60 msec (bottom row).

DISCUSSION

The current study evaluates the use of ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid for combined NIR fluorescence- and radio-guided SLN biopsy in vulvar cancer patients. We argue that the visual intraoperative detection using ICG combined with radioactive guidance (ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid) may help to optimize the SLN procedure, and will locate the SLN more precisely (Figures 1 and 2). This could reduce the need for an unnecessary full inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, and thereby reduce anesthesia time and decrease the risk of postoperative and long-term complications such as infection or dehiscence of the wound and lymphedema.

The obtained results were compared to a previous performed and published randomized controlled trial 20. The current trial was performed using the same camera system and identical surgical workup. In the previous trial ICG was prepared using 2 different protocols to obtain ICG or ICG bound to Human serum albumin (HSA). 1.6 mL of ICG alone (N=12) or ICG:HSA (N=12) were injected in the operating room directly before surgery. Hence in both formulations 0.62 mg of ICG was injected effectively. Overall, a total of 36 patients who underwent SLN mapping using both radioactive, blue, and fluorescence guidance were evaluated in the current analysis. Intraoperative NIR fluorescence based SLN detection rates were 75%, 83%, and 100% for ICG alone, ICG:HSA, and ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid, respectively (P = 0.21). Up to 25% more SLNs were optically identified using ICG:HSA and ICG–99mTc- nanocolloid compared to ICG alone, showing a trend towards significance (P = 0.06). Time between skin incision and first SLN detection were not significantly different between the different patient populations (P = 0.79). Time between skin incision and SLN identification increased with BMI (R = 0.54; P <0.01) (Figure 3). NIR fluorescence imaging enabled visualization of percutaneous lymphatic channels in 39% of patients which seemed to be inversely correlated to BMI (R = -0.28; P < 0.10) and could assist the skin incision placement during surgery (Figure 2). A comparison between patient characteristics and SLN identification results can also be found in tables 1 and 2.

FIGURE 3. Time between skin incision and SLN detection.

FIGURE 3

Shown is the effect of Body Mass Index (BMI) (abscissa) on skin incision to SLN identification time (ordinate) in the context of ICG preparation method. Points represent individual patients. Green circles represent patients that received ICG alone; blue circle represents patients that received ICG:HSA; and red circles represents patients that received ICG:99mTc-nanocolloid. Dotted line represents the median for each group.

All three ICG-based formulations were able to optically detect SLNs during surgery, but, although not significant, ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid seemed to outperform the other two formulations in terms of the intraoperative detection rate, even though it uses the lowest amount of ICG (only 160 nmol compared to 800 nmol used for ICG alone and ICG:HSA). Moreover, this visualization was achieved with a lower injected volume (1.0 mL vs. 1.6 mL) and a significantly longer period between tracer administration and surgical resection (up to 20h longer). The improved visualization is likely related to the superior retention in the SLN and the direct correlation between pre- and intra-operative findings in which the SLN can be visualized real-time 31. The 5-times lower injected dose of ICG (ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid compared to ICG and ICG:HSA) and the up to 20h increase in time between injection and NIR-guided resection, did result in a significantly lower SBR for ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid. However, the lower SBR of 5.4 did not limit the surgical guidance and did not result in prolongation of the time between skin excision and first SLN identification.

Combining ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid permits both fluorescence and radioactivity guidance after a single injection. And, unlike patent blue, the use of ICG does not alter the surgical field by dark staining or tattooing the skin of the patient 32. In addition, clinical implementation of this hybrid tracer is simple as it is based on 99mTc-nanocolloid, which is an approved lymphatic tracer in Europe and only needs addition of a small amount (0.05 mg) of ICG, also approved for clinical use (off-label use for SLN identification) 23. In concordance with previous reports where blue dye and NIR fluorescence was compared for drainage sites in the groin 20;21;24, NIR fluorescence outperformed blue dye in terms of SLN detection; in the present study only 62% of nodes stained blue. Therefore, blue dye does not appear to add value to the SLN procedure compared to NIR fluorescence imaging, if available. Therefore, we would argue that blue dye staining should not be considered part of the standard anymore in future studies.

A significant advantage of NIR imaging is that it can provide real-time surgical guidance. To date, most centers that are implementing the use of NIR fluorescence-guided SLN biopsy with indocyanine green in an “open” setting are using the Photo Dynamic Eye (PDE; Hamamatsu, Japan) camera system 19;21. This system is commercially available and easy to use; however, no color overlay is possible. To enable the surgeon to work under direct image guidance, navigation in relation to the surgical anatomy is desirable. The camera system used in this study is capable of displaying NIR fluorescence signal in relation to the surgical anatomy by a real-time overlay function between color and NIR fluorescence, using a hands-free setup 28.

It should be pointed out that the hydrodynamic diameter of the tracer compounds used, ICG (≤ 1 nm), HSA (7nm) and Nanocolloid (20-80 nm), are considerably different, which could have a major impact on the lymphatic migration and retention in the SLNs 22. A small particle (like ICG) has the potential to travel much faster through the lymphatic vessels and could thereby access second tier nodes. However, average number of SLN identified in the current study did not differ between groups.

During the implementation of a novel technique, it is of major importance to understand its limitations. NIR fluorescence imaging has a maximum penetration depth of approximately 5 mm into (fatty) tissue 17. Therefore, detectability of SLNs in patients with higher BMI can be challenging. In our study we found that the time between skin incision and SLN identification increases with an increase in BMI. As radioactive guidance has a much higher penetration depth, it could be especially of value in patients with higher BMI. Therefore, radioactive guidance appeared to be still obligatory for preoperative planning and for the identification of deeply located SLNs 33.

To conclude, this study demonstrates the added value of direct lymphatic guidance towards the SLN in relation to the surgical anatomy by combining the use of a radioactive and NIR fluorescence guidance in a single tracer. In vulvar cancer the ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid based SLN procedure seems to outperform ICG, ICG:HSA and blue dye based SLN procedures in terms of the intraoperative optical detection rate. This improvement is achieved with considerably less dye and is also effective at longer time intervals. Moreover, the ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid compound is extremely simple to formulate. Therefore we would recommend using ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid for combined fluorescence and radio-guided SLN mapping in vulvar cancer patients.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Video
Download video file (30.2MB, mp4)

FIGURE 4. Signal-to-Background ratios between study protocols.

FIGURE 4

The signal-to-background ratios of the different formulations is shown as mean with range: ICG alone (0.62 mg; 1.6 mL; injected during surgery), ICG:HSA (0.62 mg; 1.6 mL; injected during surgery) and ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid (0.05 mg; 0.4 mL; injected up to 20h prior to surgery).

Acknowledgments

We thank Margriet J.G. Löwik and Dorien M.A. Berends-van der Meer for their assistance during the patient inclusion process and David Burrington, Jr. for editing. This work was supported in part by the NIH grant R01-CA-115296, an EUROSTARS grant (E7555), and the Dutch Cancer Society grants UL2010-4732 and PGF 2009–4344. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. This research was performed within the framework of CTMM, the Center for Translational Molecular Medicine; project MUSIS (grant 030-202).

Footnotes

Clinical Trial Registration: NTR3849

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Floris P.R. Verbeek, M.Sc.: None

Quirijn R.G.J. Tummers, M.D.: None

Daphne D.D. Rietbergen, M.D.: None

Alexander A.W. Peters, M.D., Ph.D.: None

Boudewijn E. Schaafsma, M.D.: None

Cornelis J.H. van de Velde, M.D., Ph.D.: None

John V. Frangioni, M.D., Ph.D.: FLARE™ technology is owned by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, a teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. Dr. Frangioni has started three for-profit companies, Curadel, Curadel ResVet Imaging, and Curadel Surgical Innovations, which has optioned FLARE™ technology for potential licensing from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Fijs W. van Leeuwen, Ph.D.: None

Katja N. Gaarenstroom, M.D., Ph.D.: None

Alexander L. Vahrmeijer, M.D., Ph.D.: None

References

  • 1.Beller U, Quinn MA, Benedet JL, et al. Carcinoma of the vulva. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95(Suppl 1):S7–27. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(06)60028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burger MP, Hollema H, Emanuels AG, et al. The importance of the groin node status for the survival of T1 and T2 vulval carcinoma patients. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;57:327–34. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hacker NF, Leuchter RS, Berek JS, et al. Radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy through separate groin incisions. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;58:574–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gaarenstroom KN, Kenter GG, Trimbos JB, et al. Postoperative complications after vulvectomy and inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy using separate groin incisions. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003;13:522–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rouzier R, Haddad B, Dubernard G, et al. Inguinofemoral dissection for carcinoma of the vulva: effect of modifications of extent and technique on morbidity and survival. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:442–50. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01895-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Hullu JA, Hollema H, Lolkema S, et al. Vulvar carcinoma. The price of less radical surgery. Cancer. 2002;95:2331–8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hassanzade M, Attaran M, Treglia G, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130:237–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johann S, Klaeser B, Krause T, et al. Comparison of outcome and recurrence-free survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110:324–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, et al. Management of regional lymph nodes and their prognostic influence in vulvar cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:408–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Makar AP, Scheistroen M, van den Weyngaert D, et al. Surgical management of stage I and II vulvar cancer: the role of the sentinel node biopsy. Review of literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:255–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2001.011004255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Van Der Zee AG, Oonk MH, De Hullu JA, et al. Sentinel node dissection is safe in the treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:884–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Erickson BK, Divine LM, Leath CA, III, et al. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:1480–5. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Radziszewski J, Kowalewska M, Jedrzejczak T, et al. The accuracy of the sentinel lymph node concept in early stage squamous cell vulvar carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:473–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schaafsma BE, Mieog JS, Hutteman M, et al. The clinical use of indocyanine green as a near-infrared fluorescent contrast agent for image-guided oncologic surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:323–32. doi: 10.1002/jso.21943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Verbeek FP, Troyan SL, Mieog JS, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer: a multicenter experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;143:333–42. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2802-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van der Vorst JR, Hutteman M, Gaarenstroom KN, et al. Optimization of near-infrared fluorescent sentinel lymph node mapping in cervical cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:1472–8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31822b451d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vahrmeijer AL, Hutteman M, van der Vorst JR, et al. Image-guided cancer surgery using near-infrared fluorescence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hutteman M, van der Vorst JR, Gaarenstroom KN, et al. Optimization of near-infrared fluorescent sentinel lymph node mapping for vulvar cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(1):89.e1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Crane LM, Themelis G, Arts HJ, et al. Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging for sentinel lymph node detection in vulvar cancer: first clinical results. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:291–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schaafsma BE, Verbeek FP, Peters AA, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer: a randomised comparison of lymphatic tracers. BJOG. 2013;120:758–64. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Matheron HM, van den Berg NS, Brouwer OR, et al. Multimodal surgical guidance towards the sentinel node in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131:720–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van Leeuwen AC, Buckle T, Bendle G, et al. Tracer-cocktail injections for combined pre- and intraoperative multimodal imaging of lymph nodes in a spontaneous mouse prostate tumor model. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16:016004. doi: 10.1117/1.3528027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brouwer OR, Buckle T, Vermeeren L, et al. Comparing the Hybrid Fluorescent-Radioactive Tracer Indocyanine Green-99mTc-Nanocolloid with 99mTc-Nanocolloid for Sentinel Node Identification: A Validation Study Using Lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1034–40. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.103127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brouwer OR, van den Berg NS, Matheron HM, et al. A hybrid radioactive and fluorescent tracer for sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma as a potential replacement for blue dye. Eur Urol. 2014;65:600–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oonk MH, van Hemel BM, Hollema H, et al. Size of sentinel-node metastasis and chances of non-sentinel-node involvement and survival in early stage vulvar cancer: results from GROINSS-V, a multicentre observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:646–52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70104-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schaafsma BE, Verbeek FP, Rietbergen DD, et al. Clinical trial of combined radio- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1037–44. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hutteman M, van der Vorst JR, Gaarenstroom KN, et al. Optimization of near-infrared fluorescent sentinel lymph node mapping for vulvar cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:89–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mieog JS, Troyan SL, Hutteman M, et al. Toward optimization of imaging system and lymphatic tracer for near-infrared fluorescent sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2483–91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1566-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Troyan SL, Kianzad V, Gibbs-Strauss SL, et al. The FLARE intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging system: a first-in-human clinical trial in breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2943–52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0594-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nieweg OE, Tanis PJ, Kroon BB. The definition of a sentinel node. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:538–41. doi: 10.1007/s10434-001-0538-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.van der Poel HG, Buckle T, Brouwer OR, et al. Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer. Eur Urol. 2011;60:826–33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vahrmeijer AL, Frangioni JV. Seeing the invisible during surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:749–50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schaafsma BE, Mieog JSD, Hutteman M, et al. J Surg Oncol. 2011. The clinical use of indocyanine green as a near-infrared fluorescent contrast agent for image-guided oncologic surgery. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Video
Download video file (30.2MB, mp4)

RESOURCES