Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Imaging logoLink to Journal of Medical Imaging
. 2015 Mar 4;2(1):016003. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.1.016003

Multipurpose nonlinear optical imaging system for in vivo and ex vivo multimodal histology

Martin Weinigel a,*, Hans Georg Breunig a,b, Aisada Uchugonova a,b, Karsten König a,b
PMCID: PMC4478869  PMID: 26158089

Abstract.

We report on a flexible multipurpose nonlinear microscopic imaging system based on a femtosecond excitation source and a photonic crystal fiber with multiple miniaturized time-correlated single-photon counting detectors. The system provides the simultaneous acquisition of e.g., two-photon autofluorescence, second-harmonic generation, and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering images. Its flexible scan head permits ex vivo biological imaging with subcellular resolution such as rapid biopsy examination during surgery as well as imaging on small as well as large animals. Above all, such an arrangement perfectly matches the needs for the clinical investigation of human skin in vivo where knowledge about the distribution of endogenous fluorophores, second-harmonic generation–active collagen as well as nonfluorescent lipids is of high interest.

Keywords: CARS, multiphoton tomography, skin imaging, second-harmonic generation, fluorescent lifetime imaging, multimodal

1. Introduction

High-resolution nonlinear deep tissue imaging13 has been realized by pixelwise focusing near-infrared (NIR) femtosecond laser pulses inside the sample and collecting fluorescence signals in the epidirection. Advantageously, the nonlinear dependence on the excitation intensity minimizes out-of-focus excitation and provides optical sectioning2 with high signal to noise ratios (SNR). Additionally, the use of NIR laser radiation results in reduced out-of-focus bleaching and high penetration depths due to low scattering and low absorption of the tissue compared to one-photon excitation. The spatially resolved two-photon autofluorescence (AF) of intrinsic fluorophores, such as elastin, melanin, flavines, and NAD(P)H permits visualization of the morphological structure of the skin.4 Employing time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC)5 provides their characteristic fluorescence lifetimes and thus allows their distinction.1 Marking the lifetimes in pseudocolors represents the corresponding fluorescent lifetime image (FLIM).1,3

A further nonlinear optical process which can be used for deep tissue imaging is second-harmonic generation (SHG). It provides complimentary information on noncentrosymmetric protein structures of the dermal collagen network.6

An additional modality with optical sectioning capability is coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS).7 CARS allows to detect nonfluorescent and non-SHG, but Raman-active substances. For CARS excitation, a pump (ωpump), a Stokes (ωStokes) and a probe (ωprobe) photon are required.8 To simplify the CARS implementation, often the pump and probe photons are generated by a common light source (ωpump=ωprobe). In case the frequency difference between ωpump and ωStokes matches a molecular vibrational frequency, the CARS signal at ωCARS=2ωpumpωStokes is strongly enhanced.8

CARS can be applied to provide supplementary information on the distribution of lipids in human skin.912 Lipids are nonfluorescent, but rich in Raman-active CH2 groups with a stretch vibrational transition at 2845cm1.13 In human skin, they are, for instance, part of (i) the superficial skin barrier (cholesterol),14 (ii) the cellular membrane (phospholipids), and (iii) the dermis, stored inside dermal adipocytes as energy reservoirs.15 Additionally, CARS can provide information on the water distribution (OH vibration at about 3250cm1)16 inside the skin which is of high interest, e.g., in dermatology to investigate the skin barrier function (trans epidermal water loss)17 and in cosmetic research during skin hydration measurements.18

This high wavenumber region including the vibrational transitions of lipids (CH2), proteins (CH3), and water (OH) can be accessed by employing commercially available photonic crystal fibers (PCF) as the source for the CARS Stokes photons.19 In fact, broadband high spectral power densities in the necessary wavelength region between 900 and 1100 nm are provided by these PCFs,19 which are inevitable for deep tissue imaging. The broadband CARS Stokes spectrum (i) can be narrowed by a bandpass filter to excite a single vibrational transition such as lipids20 or (ii) can be employed to excite multiple vibrational transitions simultaneously. The latter broadband approach allows multiplex CARS (M-CARS) “spectroscopy” and “microscopy” which has been demonstrated recently by the application of supercontinuum fibers covering the detection of lipids/proteins and water.2123

The described label-free AF, SHG, and CARS modalities are perfectly in line with the needs for clinical skin imaging. During the last decade, “CE marked” AF/SHG based tomographs have been developed including systems with an additional CARS option.1012,20 The certified clinical AF/SHG-CARS tomograph MPTflex CARS (JenLab, Germany) as a mobile flexible nonlinear imaging system not only simplifies in vivo AF/SHG imaging of human skin9,2426 but is also a multipurpose system which can be used for small animal research, in vivo stem cell tracking27 and ex vivo biopsy imaging. Free-space-beam delivery inside an articulated optical mirror arm is provided by active beam position control. This allows a high degree of freedom for the positioning of the scan head, inevitable for a variety of medical applications [Fig. 1(a)].26,28,29

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Flexible multimodal tomograph MPTflex CARS and (b) spectral characteristics of the employed photonic crystal fiber.

The scan head of the tomograph MPTflex CARS typically contains a dual-channel detector for simultaneous detection of AF and SHG or AF/SHG and CARS signals, respectively. Its laser scanning arrangement allows to acquire AF/SHG and CARS images with a field-of-view (FOV) of 350×350μm2 and 200×200μm2, up to a depth of 200 and 150μm, respectively. However, due to the limited number of detectors, a separation of simultaneously generated AF and SHG signals during CARS imaging was not possible. Thus, e.g., skin aging studies based on the SHG-to-AF aging index of dermis (SAAID)30 were limited to non-CARS tomographs.

In this article, we report on a very compact multichannel-(FLIM)-detector for the clinical tomograph MPTflex CARS, which satisfies the need for simultaneous detection of multiple signals. This paper is divided into three sections: (i) the system characterization, (ii) ex vivo imaging of murine tissue samples, and (iii) the application on human skin in vivo.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Setup

A detailed description of the imaging system MPTflex CARS [Fig. 1(a)] was published recently.10 Briefly, the system consists of a mobile optoelectronic housing (I) and a freely movable and adjustable scan head (II) connected to the housing (I) by a flexible articulated mirror arm (III). For CARS contrast, the pulses (centered at 800 nm) from an 80 MHz Ti:sapphire, 100 fs oscillator (MaiTai XF-1, Spectra Physics, USA) are divided into two parts. One part, which passes a motorized delay line, is used as both CARS pump and probe. The remaining part is coupled into a PCF (FemtoWHITE CARS, NKT Photonics, Denmark) for spectral broadening.

The spectral characteristics of the PCF are presented in Fig. 1(b). The bold blue curve represents the full spectrum of the PCF behind the dichroic beam combiner SP850 with a total power of about 65 mW. Note that the applied spectrometer (BTC112E TE, B&W Tek) is not intensity calibrated for this measurement. The spectral density of the fiber is determined separately by placing a linear variable bandpass filter (LVNIRBP, Delta Optical Thin Film A/S, Denmark) behind the dichroic beam combiner SP850 and measuring its transmitted optical power at the individual transmitted spectral bands. The corresponding integrated optical power of these spectral bands is also shown in Fig. 1(b). Spectral power densities at 1045 nm are about (16mW/30nm) 0.5mW/nm and at 825 nm, spectral power densities are about 0.07mW/nm.

The bandpass filtered output [in general: centered at 1045 nm, 30-nm full width at half maximum (FWHM)] is used as the CARS Stokes laser and allows one to generate CARS contrast at 2845cm1 to probe the Raman resonances of lipids and proteins. Collinearly recombined by a dichroic beam combiner, the two beams are coupled into the articulated mirror arm in a free-space setup. On axis beam delivery through the articulated mirror arm is guaranteed by active beam stabilization, which compensates for any temperature drift of the system’s optomechanical structure and the mechanical tolerances of the articulated mirror arm. This beam stabilization is an essential element of the presented imaging system. Due to the relative long beam path (3.5m), even minor mechanical tolerances can translate to a significant position error at the back aperture of the focusing optics. The consequence would be a noncentered illumination of the FOV and thus a strong degradation of image quality.

The deviations of the CARS pump and Stokes excitation beams from the target position are successively detected by a position-sensitive detector located at a conjugated position of the focusing optics inside the scan head [see Fig. 2(a)]. The rear surface reflection of the dichroic beam splitter is used as a test beam. The feedback signals of the position-sensitive detector are sent to the computer which controls two motorized kinematic mirror mounts located in front of the articulated mirror arm.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) Schematic beam path inside the scan head with four-detector arrangement; (b) miniaturized detector electronics; (c) filter cube; (d) inverted scan head position for ex vivo imaging. AF: autofluorescence; SHG: second-harmonic generation; CARS: coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering; n.e., not employed.

This active beam stabilization and an additional motorized delay line guarantee the necessary spatial and temporal overlap, respectively, of the CARS pump and CARS Stokes pulses inside the focal volume of the 40× 1.3 numerical aperture focusing optics. The multitude of generated signals which are detectable by the system include AF, SHGPump, SHGStokes, sum frequency generation (SFGPump+Stokes) of the CARS pump and CARS Stokes photons and the CARS signals.

For a simultaneous detection and separation of AF/FLIM, SHG and CARS signals, a compact four-channel detection module has been specially developed by us for the scan head of the tomograph MPTflex CARS [see Fig. 2(a)]. The miniaturized printed circuit board for a single detector is presented in Fig. 2(b). The quantum efficiencies of the photomultiplier tube (PMT) sensor elements are >30% for the AF spectral range (PMT R9880U-210) and >15% for the CARS detection channel (PMT R9880-20).

Compared to previous detector designs, several advantages are provided by the new detection module: (i) fast temporal responses of all four detectors and the corresponding electronics, (ii) lightweight mechanical design that seals off the detector active areas against ambient light which is inevitable for the clinical environment, and (iii) changeable filter cubes [see Fig. 2(c)].

Short pass filters are used to separate signal light from residual back-scattered excitation light. A longpass dichroic mirror LP565 separates the AF/SHG- and CARS signals, respectively. The CARS detection channel (3) is spectrally further narrowed to 13 nm (FWHM) centered at 650 nm. The AF/SHG beam path was split by a longpass dichroic mirror LP405 nm into an AF channel (1) equipped with a shortpass SP600 nm filter to block the residual CARS signals. A 40-nm bandpass filter centered at 390 nm in front of the SHG channel (2) blocks residual AF signals. [Channel (4) was not employed (n.e.) in this setup and the experiment, but offers the possibility to detect further signals.]

The simultaneous readout of the detectors was accomplished by single-photon counting (SPC) hardware (JenLab, Germany) generating images of 512×512pixels at a mean dwell time of 26μs/pixel. [This corresponds to about 6.5s/frame. Higher frame rates are possible, e.g., for an overview image of the region-of-interest (ROI), however, with a lower SNR.] Lifetime measurements can be accomplished simultaneously to SPC by TCSPC hardware SPC 150 (Becker&Hickl, Germany) with a standard resolution of 128×128pixels (alternative pixel resolution settings are possible). In the following experiments, TCSPC data are presented only for channel (1), but in principle, all four channels can be readout by the same TCSPC hardware using the integrated TCSPC router electronics HRT-41 (Becker&Hickl, Germany).

2.2. Spatial Resolution Measurement

Axial and lateral resolution was measured for AF and CARS modalities in epidirection without averaging. As a figure of merit for the lateral resolution of the imaging system, spin-coated subresolution microspheres were imaged and the FWHM of their point spread function was measured. For AF and CARS imaging, 0.20μm yellow/green fluorescent microspheres (Fluoresbrite™ Plain YG Microspheres, Polyscience, USA) and 0.21μm polystyrene microspheres (PS02N, Bangs Laboratories, USA) were recorded, respectively, with pixel dwell times of 11μs/pixel (512×512pixels). A Gaussian fit was applied to the line intensity profile through the center of imaged subresolution microspheres. To determine the axial resolution, the derivative of the edge response during the transition from cover glass to fluorescein solution (AF) and from cover glass to glycerol (CARS) has been used as a figure of merit,31 respectively. A stack of 0.1-μm separated images was recorded and a Gaussian fit was applied to the first derivative of the mean intensity distribution along the z direction. The power for AF imaging at 800 nm was set to 0.2 mW and for CARS imaging, 5 mW and 3 mW for the CARS pump and CARS Stokes laser, respectively. To increase the amount of backscattered light (similar to human skin), a piece of white label paper was placed in the optical axis directly behind the focal volume.

2.3. Validation of the FLIM System

FLIM capability has been verified (i) by determining the temporal resolution of the complete imaging system and (ii) measuring the lifetime of fluorescein solution as a reference. As a figure of merit for the temporal resolution of the complete imaging system, the FWHM of the instrument response function (IRF) has been measured. The IRF has been determined by detecting SHG from the nonlinear interaction of the 800-nm excitation radiation (CARS Stokes laser was blocked) with urea crystals and recording its apparent time duration by the TCSPC software package (SPCImage, Becker & Hickl, Germany).

Additionally, the lifetime of the fluorescein solution (Fluorescein SE Thilo 1.7mg/ml Fluorescein-Natrium; Alcon Pharma, Germany) as a standard test sample was acquired. To suppress self-quenching effects, the initial concentration of the fluorescein solution (0.17%) has been diluted to about 0.002%. For this measurement, the effective IRF was automatically determined by the TCSPC software package.

2.4. Determination of Chemical Contrast

The chemical contrast of lipids was measured by imaging a three-dimensional (3-D) structured chess pattern test target (70-μm grating constant) made of borosilicate glass whose cavities were filled with immersion oil (type 518 F; Zeiss, Germany). The lateral intensity profile through the center of the position of an oil-filled cavity and the position of the sole glass next to it was determined. The CARS-independent background, composed of brightness bias, detector noise, and AF/laser leakage, was compensated by acquiring an image without the temporal overlap of CARS pump and CARS Stokes pulses (temporal detuning of >5ps). The ratio of resonant (R) to nonresonant background (NRB) was determined by subtracting the mean intensity value (IB) of this background from the acquired lateral intensity profile I[R/NRB=(IMAXIB)/(IMINIB)]. Similar to the above described resolution measurements, the amount of backscattered light was increased by a piece of white label paper placed directly behind the focal volume.

2.5. Ex Vivo Imaging

To demonstrate ex vivo imaging, the inverted scan head position was set up as shown in Fig. 2(d). Animal studies have been conducted in accordance with ethical standards. Fresh murine tissue samples (extracted 5 h postmortem) of brain, abdominal fat, intestine, liver, spinal cord, and muscle from a hairy mouse were placed on an N-BK7 coverslip connected by double sided tape with the system associated adapter ring. The XY and Z positioning of the tissue relative to the focus position was realized by an integrated motorized stage with maximum vertical and axial travel distances of 5×5mm2 and 5 mm and a step size of 12.7μm and 1.25μm, respectively.

All images were acquired with total optical powers (Ppump+pStokes) in the range of 10 to 40 mW at the sample position at imaging depths of 5 to 30μm and without averaging. For better print-visualization of individual images, their contrast has been enhanced using ImageJ software.32

2.6. In Vivo Human Skin Imaging

For human skin imaging, immersion oil (type 518 F; Zeiss, Germany), N-BK7 coverslips, and water were placed between focusing optics and skin. To comply with laser safety requirements of the certified body, the total output power of both beams (Ppump+PStokes) was limited to 50 mW at the skin. Imaging was performed on healthy human skin (male forearm and nasal wing) in a skin depth of 70 and 5μm, respectively.

2.7. Multiplex CARS

In order to realize M-CARS, the Stokes-bandpass filter [see Fig. 2(a)] was replaced by a longpass LP785. “M-CARS spectroscopy” (forward detected; pump-laser centered at 782 nm) was realized to demonstrate the chemical selectivity. Multiplex CARS is accomplished by spectral focusing.33 The necessary chirp is passively achieved by the dispersive elements inside the optical beam path. CARS spectra of water, glycerol and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were acquired using a fiber-coupled spectrometer (BTC112E TE, B&W Tek, USA; 60-s integration time) with a collimator lens attached to the collection side of the fiber. To compensate spectral power density variations of the supercontinuum, the acquired spectra of water, glycerol and DMSO were normalized against the nonresonant signal generated inside an N-BK7 slide in a similar way as described by Kano.34

For “M-CARS imaging” of test samples containing water and oil, the accessibility of the OH region was realized by tuning the wavelength of the CARS pump laser to 788 nm. For separation of lipid-CARS and water-CARS signals, a dichroic longpass beam splitter LP640 was combined with a 13 nm bandpass filter with a transmission maximum centered at a wavelength of 640 nm [lipid channel (3)] and a 15 nm bandpass filter with a transmission center wavelength at 625 nm [water channel (4)]. As a proof of principle demonstration, an interface of water and petroleum jelly (Vaseline® original, Unilever, Germany) was imaged. Considering the chirp of the Stokes pulses, images were acquired at different temporal delay positions (+0.25ps=maximum signal in lipid channel; 0.25ps=maximum signal in water channel; ±0ps=signal in both channels).

Finally, the “M-CARS imaging” capability was tested on fresh murine abdominal fat tissue.

3. Results

3.1. Spatial Resolution Measurement

The mean FWHM for AF- and CARS-lateral intensity profiles was determined to be (0.39±0.02)μm (emission maximum at about: 486 nm) and (0.28±0.03)μm (emission at: 651 nm), respectively. Typical intensity profiles are illustrated in Figs. 3(a) and 3(c). The FWHM of the derivative of the AF and CARS intensity edge response was determined to be (1.85±0.15)μm (emission maximum at about: 520 nm) and (1.53±0.12)μm, respectively. Typical responses are visible in Figs. 3(b) and 3(d).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a) Lateral two-photon autofluorescence (AF) intensity profile of a subresolution fluorescent microsphere; (c) lateral coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) intensity profile of a polystyrene microsphere; (b) and (d) intensity edge responses and corresponding derivatives of a glass/fluorescein and glass/glycerol interface, respectively; (e) temporal instrument response function (IRF) of the imaging system; (f) typical decay function and (g) lifetime distribution histogram of fluorescein solution; (h) characterization of resonant to nonresonant background ratio at an oil/glass interface and (i) at the exit of sebaceous gland (human skin in vivo from the nasal wing, scale bar: 20μm).

3.2. Validation of the FLIM System

A typical IRF is illustrated in Fig. 3(e) with an FWHM of 200 ps. The fluorescence decay curve of fluorescein [Fig. 3(f)] shows a monoexponential decay [fitting settings: monoexponential best-fit curve (dashed); threefold binning]. The decay time distribution histogram of fluorescein with a single maximum is presented in Fig. 3(g).

3.3. Determination of Chemical Contrast

The CARS image of the 3-D structured test target whose cavities were filled with immersion oil is shown in Fig. 3(h) with the lateral CARS intensity profile (I, blue) through the center of an oil-filled cavity and the mean background signal (IB, red). Subtraction of IB (non-CARS background) from I reveals a ratio R/NRB of about 27:1.

3.4. Ex Vivo Imaging

Multimodal images of fresh murine brain, abdominal fat tissue, intestine, liver, myelin sheaths, and abdominal muscle are shown in Fig. 4. The optical section of the abdominal fat tissue indicates a strong CARS contrast due to high CH2 concentrations inside the monovacuolar adipocytes. The adipocytes are connected to each other by reticular collagen fibers (SHG) and the fluorescence contrast is visible from the periphery of the cells. Interestingly, the lifetime image accentuates a further capillary-like structure (arrowhead), which is difficult to recognize in the AF or SHG channel. High lipid concentrations are also present inside liver tissue as intracellular lipid vacuoles/droplets, inside the spinal cord as myelin sheaths and in between muscle tissue as adipocytes, respectively. Images of muscle tissue additionally show highly periodic SHG contrast due to myofilaments.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Ex vivo examination of various murine tissues; AF: autofluorescence; SHG: second-harmonic generation; CARS: coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering; FLIM: fluorescence lifetime imaging (τm=mean lifetime); CARS pump laser: 800 nm; CARS Stokes laser: 1035 nm. Scale bar: 30μm.

3.5. In Vivo Human Skin Imaging

Multichannel AF/FLIM-SHG-CARS functionality on healthy human skin in vivo at a depth of 70μm (dermal papillae) is demonstrated in Fig. 5. The AF channel represents a circular arrangement of basal cells with elastin fibers in the center. The corresponding lifetime image reveals the heterogeneity of lifetimes (pseudocolors). The SHG channel visualizes the corresponding interweaved collagen fibers due to the nonlinear light–collagen interaction. The CARS channel shows sharply separated cellular details but also roundish structures of dermal papillae are noticeable.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Multichannel imaging of human skin in vivo (forearm, dermal papillae at 70μm imaging depth); AF: autofluorescence; SHG: second-harmonic generation; CARS: coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering; FLIM: fluorescence lifetime imaging (τm=mean lifetime).

Figure 3(i) shows an optical section of human skin from the nasal wing. The CARS signal (red) points out high lipid concentrations of sebum on the surface of the skin. The AF signal (green) illustrates a hair and corneocytes.

3.6. Multiplex CARS

The glycerol CARS spectrum [Fig. 6(b), black] reveals two significant peaks, the CH2 peak at 2845cm1 and the OH peak at 3250cm1. The latter is caused by the OH-stretching vibration of the glycerol molecule and the high-water content of glycerol (about 14% in accordance with the pharmacopoeia). The DMSO spectrum (red) was recorded to characterize the spectral resolution of the CARS system. The Raman band at 2916cm1 can be clearly distinguished from the band at 3000cm1. The CARS spectrum of water (blue) has a maximum at 3250cm1. Notice that the intensities were normalized and the OH intensities correspond to one-fourth of the CH2 intensities.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Broadband multiplex coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (M-CARS) imaging; (a) M-CARS capability at petroleum jelly/water interface; (b) CARS spectrum of water, glycerol and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO); (c) autofluorescence (AF), second-harmonic generation (SHG), fluorescence lifetime images (FLIM) and multiplex (M-)CARS images of abdominal fat tissue. Scale bar: 30μm.

M-CARS imaging at the interface of water and petroleum jelly [Fig. 6(a)] at different temporal delay positions reveals a significant contrast reversal from the CH2 to the OH channel. At zero delay, both channels simultaneously detect vibrational related signals with sufficient contrast between water and petroleum jelly.

Furthermore, the capability for M-CARS imaging was tested on murine abdominal fat tissue seen in Fig. 6(c). Next to the high contrast of the AF and SHG modalities, a high contrast can be also visualized between intracellular lipids and extracellular water. The composite image in Fig. 6(c) shows the signals pseudocolored (AF: green, SHG: blue, CH2-CARS: red, and OH-CARS: yellow). The FLIM data disclose additional, lifetime-dependent contrast, with granular structures in between the intracellular lipid matrix.

4. Discussion

4.1. Spatial Resolution Measurement

Nonflexible multiphoton tomographs based on stable breadboard designs have a typical resolution of about 300nm.1 It should be noticed that the gained flexibility of the MPTflex CARS due to the optical articulated mirror arm results in a 3.5-m long optical beam path. This influences the spatial resolution due to a possible jitter between the two beams and the optical axis as well as between the two beams. Interestingly, the above described resolution measurements clearly reveal an excellent subcellular resolution of <400nm which is close to the one of a stable breadboard design but with the advantage of significantly more flexibility and thus accessibility for in vivo imaging.

4.2. Validation of the FLIM System

Essential for the acquisition of lifetime data (FLIM) is a fast response of the detector and the electronics of the imaging system. The novel multichannel detector reveals a representative IRF with an FWHM of about 200 ps, which is of the order of previous multiphoton imaging systems.35 Furthermore, the lifetime distribution histogram exhibits a single maximum at 4.4 ns, which coincides with literature values ranging from 4.1 ns to 4.5 ns.36,37

4.3. Determination of Chemical Contrast

In the applied femtosecond CARS system, the spectral resolution is set by the spectral width of the CARS pump laser, where a pulse width of 100 fs corresponds to a spectral width of about 150cm1, which is generally much broader than the line width of many Raman resonances.38 The chemical contrast for the excitation of narrow Raman lines is reduced due to noninvolved spectral parts of the CARS pump laser. In this manner, the generated NRB limits the chemical contrast, which makes it difficult for the system to be applied for the fingerprint region.39 In the high wavenumber region, the situation is different. The broad Raman line width at a resonance of 2845cm1 CH2 (lipids) and 2950cm1 CH3 (proteins)40 roughly fits to the spectral width of the femtosecond pulses and thus supports the sensitivity and the ratio R/NRB. In fact, Chen et al. demonstrated that the vibrational contrast at 2845cm1 for picosecond as well as femtosecond CARS systems are comparable.41

These findings are also confirmed by the R/NRB measurement at the 3-D structured test target filled with oil (R/NRB=271) but also ex vivo on fresh murine myelin sheaths (see Fig. 4) with a vibrational contrast of >71, which are similar to contrast ratios observed by other groups.41 For most parts of the epidermis and upper dermis of human skin, the R/NRB is significantly lower due to lower concentrations of lipids. R/NRB ratios of about 3:1 (data not shown here) have been determined by our group, however, some ROIs like the exit of sebaceous glands on the skin surface disclose higher lipid concentrations (sebum) and thus reveal higher R/NRB ratios in a range between 10:1 and 20:1 [see Fig. 3(i)].

4.4. Ex Vivo Imaging

The application of the described multichannel detector uncovers valuable complementary information, such as seen in the murine tissue images of Fig. 4. To exemplify, a capillary like structure (arrowhead in Fig. 4), which is very challenging to be recognized in the AF or SHG channel, is highlighted inside the lifetime image. There are even blood cells visible inside this capillary.

In Fig. 4, the muscle tissue shows similar information inside the SHG and the AF image. This is most likely due to nonlinear interaction at the muscle fibrils producing a SHGStokes signal at a wavelength of 517 nm (and possibly also due to the SFGPump+Stokes signal at a wavelength of 451 nm). For effective suppression of the SHGStokes and SFGPump+Stokes signals inside the AF image, spectral notch filters can be applied. Furthermore, the application of TCSPC hardware allows a temporal separation between the instantaneous SHG and SFG signals (fast components) and the decayed fluorescence lifetime component by the application of time gating.42

Even though the images of Fig. 4 represent ex vivo data, such data sets can also be generated in vivo. This has already been demonstrated over a time period of several hours on living mice with the AF and SHG imaging capability of the MPTflex (JenLab, Germany).27

4.5. In Vivo Human Skin Imaging

Subcellular details are visible inside the multimodal in vivo section of Fig. 5. In addition to the morphology accessible in the AF and SHG images, the lifetime image reveals a heterogeneity of lifetimes which is the result of different endogenous fluorophores and their microenvironments inside the skin (settings: double-exponential best-fit, threefold binning). The basal cells can be clearly distinguished (orange color coded; high content of melanin4) from the elastin (blue–green color coded; longer lifetimes).1 The CARS image provides additional morphological information.

There is no significant AF crosstalk visible in the SHG image. However, for deeper skin regions, a weak SHGStokes and SFGPump+Stokes signal from the nonlinear interaction at collagen molecules of the dermis cannot be excluded. In general, this can be easily eliminated by the same methods already discussed above including the application of spectral notch filters or by applying time gating.

4.6. Multiplex CARS

The proof of concept experiment in Fig. 6 shows that broadband multiplex CARS imaging with a simultaneous detection and separation of lipids/proteins and water has been realized. With the filters and beamsplitters used in this study, the spectral separation between the CH2 and OH vibration occurred at the position of 3100cm1. The CH2 detection channel (gray shaded background) is separated from the OH detection channel (hatched background) by a few wavenumbers only [see Fig. 6(b)]. This results in a possible detection of the OH side wing by the CH2 channel. Even though the normalized OH intensities correspond to one-fourth of the CH2 intensities, this crosstalk is not negligible at 3100cm1. In future, this crosstalk can be reduced by an appropriate filter assembly with a spectral separation close to 3000cm1.

The CARS spectrum of water has a maximum at around 3250cm1 which is similar to the CARS spectrum published by Slepkov et al.23 To determine the spectral resolution of the system, a CARS spectrum of DMSO was recorded. It shows two clearly distinguished peaks at 2916cm1 and at about 3000cm1. However, the appearing spectral resolution is higher than the one expected from the CARS pump pulse spectral width (150cm1) which is due to the present chirp of the CARS pump and/or CARS Stokes pulse(s). In future, the chemical contrast of the presented M-CARS imaging approach might be enhanced by system adaption such as further spectral focusing which could be advantageous for separating lipid and protein signals.

4.7. Considerations on Data Handling

The signals of a multitude of modalities can be recorded simultaneously by the described multichannel detector. It is obvious that the amount of generated data increases with the number of applied channels. One SPC image (bit depth: 16 bit) of 512×512pixels generates 0.5 MB of data. Acquiring a typical stack of 20 images (z-step 10μm) and applying all four channels creates about 40 MB of data per image stack. For an estimated minimum of three stacks, the amount of data increases to 120 MB per patient or lesion. Additional data accumulates when adding the lifetime modality. As an example, Fig. 7(a) represents pseudocolored FLIM data of human dermis. The number of photons per pixel (SPC) is shown in Figs. 7(c) and 7(d) of a single elastin fiber. Pixels with photon numbers >800 are red and others are green colored, respectively. Altogether, the framed pixels (onefold binning) contain 6300 photons with their arrival time represented as a temporal decay curve in Fig. 7(b) (double exponential fit). The additional lifetime information is of high value for functional imaging of the tissue, which however, requires at least 8 MB (related to 128×128pixels) of disk space for only one lifetime image. (It is possible to acquire the lifetime data of four channels simultaneously, with a higher resolution of 512×512pixels which, however, would exceed this discussion.) Completing this discussion, the data for one typical examination will generate data exceeding 0.5 GB.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

(a) Fluorescence lifetime image of upper dermis; (b) decay curve of the marked pixel (arrowhead; elastin fiber) in (a); (c) single photon counting image (pixel color: 800=green; >800=red); and (d) magnified section of the framed part in (c). Scale bar: 40μm.

The analysis of the acquired data in multiphoton imaging is still handled manually which limits the patient throughput. In future, automated image analysis will be required. Especially, the quantification of photon numbers for skin aging measurements30 and qualitative analysis such as extraction of diagnostic relevant data for skin cancer detection28,29 require sophisticated computer-aided diagnosis (CAD),43 which in the future should be combined with clinical multiphoton tomographs.

5. Conclusion

A multipurpose, multimodal, and mobile imaging system with superior optical sectioning capability has been presented. A multitude of information including AF/FLIM, SHG, and CARS can be obtained in a single scan. Several applications could benefit from this multichannel detector such as ex vivo imaging of excised tumor tissue44 or SAAID-based skin aging measurements30 of human skin. Visualization of lipid/protein and water contrast enables further applications in dermatology to investigate skin barrier problems17 or in cosmetic research for skin hydration measurements,18 such as depth profiles of skin lipids and water. Optical sections of human skin can be realized completely painlessly with high-resolution images acquired in a few seconds. Additionally, the integrated XYZ motorized stage allows easy tissue positioning for ex vivo (inverted imaging system) as well as in vivo human skin imaging in a 5×5mm2 ROI and an axial travel distance (Z) of 5 mm for easy and fast localization of the tissue/skin surface.

A future step will be the integration of a sophisticated CAD to handle the significant amount of acquired data and thus to increase patient throughput.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the national projects Chemoprävent 13N10507 and Biofeedback 13N12594.

Biographies

Martin Weinigel graduated in biomedical engineering at the University of Applied Sciences Jena in 2007. He wrote his diploma thesis at the Department of Screening and Rare Cell Detection Technologies at The Burnham Institute for Medical Research, San Diego, USA. In 2010, he received an ME degree in laser- and optotechnology of the University of Applied Sciences in Jena. His current research includes the development of multimodal imaging systems at the JenLab GmbH, Germany.

Hans Georg Breunig is a research scientist at JenLab GmbH and Saarland University, Germany. He holds a master’s degree in physics from the University of Maryland at College Park, USA, and received a PhD in physics from the University of Bremen, Germany, in 2003. He has worked for more than 10 years on applications of femtosecond lasers in different research fields and is the author of more than 30 journal papers.

Aisada Uchugonova received her master’s degree in biomedical sciences from the National University of Kyrgyzstan and her PhD degree from the Saarland University, Germany, in 2009. She served as a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, San Diego. She is currently PI on the DFG funded project in the Department of Biophotonics and Laser Technology, Saarland University. Her research interests include noninvasive and label-free imaging, optical characterization of stem cells, and nanosurgery of cells.

Karsten König is full professor and head of the Department of Biophotonics and Laser Technologies at the Saarland University. He is president of the company JenLab GmbH. He gained the PhD degree in physics and habilitation degree in cell biology from the University Jena. He published about 500 scientific papers in the field of biophotonics and laser material processing and pioneered fluorescence lifetime imaging, femtosecond laser nanoprocessing, laser transfection, and clinical multiphoton tomography.

References

  • 1.König K., Riemann I., “High-resolution multiphoton tomography of human skin with subcellular spatial resolution and picosecond time resolution,” J. Biomed. Opt. 8(3), 432–439 (2003). 10.1117/1.1577349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Denk W., Strickler J. H., Webb W. W., “Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy,” Science 248(4951), 73–76 (1990). 10.1126/science.2321027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Masters B. R., So P. T., Gratton E., “Multiphoton excitation microscopy of in vivo human skin. Functional and morphological optical biopsy based on three-dimensional imaging, lifetime measurements and fluorescence spectroscopy,” Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 838, 58–67 (1998). 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08187.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.König K., “Clinical multiphoton tomography,” J. Biophotonics 1(1), 13–23 (2008). 10.1002/(ISSN)1864-0648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Becker W., Advanced Time-Correlated Single-Photon Counting Techniques, pp. 20–24, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Campagnola P. J., et al. , “Three-dimensional high-resolution second-harmonic generation imaging of endogenous structural proteins in biological tissues,” Biophys. J. 82(1 Pt 1), 493–508 (2002). 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75414-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zumbusch A., Holtom G., Xie S., “Three-dimensional vibrational imaging by coherent anti-stokes raman scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4142–4145 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4142 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bloembergen N., “A quarter century of stimulated Raman scattering,” Pure Appl. Chem. 59, 1229–1236 (1987). 10.1351/pac198759101229 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.König K., “Hybrid multiphoton multimodal tomography of in vivo human skin,” IntraVital 1(1), 11–26 (2012). 10.4161/intv.21938 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Weinigel M., et al. , “In vivo histology: optical biopsies with chemical contrast using clinical multiphoton/CARS tomography,” Laser Phys. Lett. 11, 055601 (2014). 10.1088/1612-2011/11/5/055601 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Breunig H. G., et al. , “Clinical coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering and multiphoton tomography of human skin with a femtosecond laser and photonic crystal fiber,” Laser Phys. Lett. 10(2), 025604 (2013). 10.1088/1612-2011/10/2/025604 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Breunig H. G., et al. , “Combined in vivo multiphoton and CARS imaging of healthy and disease-affected human skin,” Microsc. Res. Tech. 75(4), 492–498 (2012). 10.1002/jemt.v75.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nan X., Cheng J.-X., Xie X. S., “Vibrational imaging of lipid droplets in live fibroblast cells with coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy,” J. Lipid Res. 44(11), 2202–2208 (2003). 10.1194/jlr.D300022-JLR200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wertz P. W., “Lipids and barrier function of the skin,” Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum 208, 7–11 (2000). 10.1080/000155500750042790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thews G., Mutschler E., Vaupel P., Anatomie Physiologie Pathophysiologie des Menschen, 5th ed., pp. 15–6 and 751–761, Wiss. Verl.- Ges., Stuttgart: (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Min W., et al. , “Coherent nonlinear optical imaging: beyond fluorescence microscopy,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 62, 507–530 (2011). 10.1146/annurev.physchem.012809.103512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Proksch E., Brandner J. M., Jensen J. M., “The skin: an indispensable barrier,” Exp. Dermatol. 17(12), 1063–1072 (2008) 10.1111/exd.2008.17.issue-12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sparr E., et al. , “Controlling the hydration of the skin though the application of occluding barrier creams,” J. R. Soc. Interface 10(80), 20120788 (2012). 10.1098/rsif.2012.0788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li B., Borri P., Langbein W., “Dual/differential coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering module for multiphoton microscopes with a femtosecond Ti:sapphire oscillator,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(6), 066004 (2013). 10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.066004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.König K., et al. , “Optical skin biopsies by clinical CARS and multiphoton fluorescence/SHG tomography,” Laser Phys. Lett. 8(6), 465–468 (2011). 10.1002/lapl.v8.6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kano H., Hamaguchi H. O., “Vibrationally resonant imaging of a single living cell by supercontinuum-based multiplex coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microspectroscopy,” Opt. Express 13(4), 1322–1327 (2005). 10.1364/OPEX.13.001322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li D., et al. , “In vivo and simultaneous multimodal imaging: Integrated multiplex coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering and two-photon microscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97(22), 223702 (2010). 10.1063/1.3521415 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Slepkov A. D., et al. , “Multimodal CARS microscopy of structured carbohydrate biopolymers,” Biomed. Opt. Express 1(5), 1347–1357 (2010). 10.1364/BOE.1.001347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Balu M., et al. , “In Vivo multiphoton NADH fluorescence reveals depth-dependent keratinocyte metabolism in human skin,” Biophys. J. 104(1), 258–267 (2013). 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miyamoto K., Kudoh H., “Quantification and visualization of cellular NAD(P)H in young and aged female facial skin with in vivo two-photon tomography,” Br. J. Dermatol. 169S2, 25–31 (2013). 10.1111/bjd.12370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Balu M., et al. , “Clinical studies of pigmented lesions in human skin by using a multiphoton tomograph,” Proc. SPIE 8588, 858812 (2013). 10.1117/12.2004697 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Uchugonova A., et al. , “Watching stem cells in the skin of living mice noninvasively,” Cell Cycle 10(12), 2017–2020 (2011). 10.4161/cc.10.12.15895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Balu M., et al. , “Distinguishing between benign and malignant melanocytic nevi by in vivo multiphoton microscopy,” Cancer Res. 74(10), 2688–2697 (2014). 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dimitrow E., et al. , “Sensitivity and specificity of multiphoton laser tomography for in vivo and ex vivo diagnosis of malignant melanoma,” J. Investig. Dermatol. 129(7), 1752–1760 (2009). 10.1038/jid.2008.439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koehler M. J., et al. , “In vivo assessment of human skin aging by multiphoton laser scanning tomography,” Opt. Lett. 31(19), 2879–2881 (2006). 10.1364/OL.31.002879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hell S., Stelzer E. H. K., “Properties of a 4Pi confocal fluorescence microscope,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9(12), 2159–2166 (1992). 10.1364/JOSAA.9.002159 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rasband W. S., “ImageJ,” U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA (1997–2014).
  • 33.Hellerer T., Enejder A. M. K., Zumbusch A., “Spectral focusing: High spectral resolution spectroscopy with broad-bandwidth laser pulses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(1), 25–27 (2004). 10.1063/1.1768312 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kano H., “Molecular spectroscopic imaging using a white-light laser source,” Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 83(7), 735–743 (2010). 10.1246/bcsj.20100004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ulrich V., et al. , “Compact multiphoton/single photon laser scanning microscope for spectral imaging and fluorescence lifetime imaging,” Scanning 26(5), 217–225 (2004). 10.1002/sca.4950260502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sjöback R., Nygren J., Kubista M., “Absorption and fluorescence properties of fluorescein,” Spectrochim. Acta Pt A 51, 7–21 (1995). 10.1016/0584-8539(95)01421-P [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bailey A., Rollefson K., “The determination of the fluorescence lifetimes of dissolved substances by a phase shift method,” J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1315–1322 (1953). 10.1063/1.1699212 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Caspers P. J., Lucassen G. W., Puppels G. J., “Combined in vivo confocal Raman spectroscopy and confocal microscopy of human skin,” Biophys. J. 85(1), 572–580 (2003). 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74501-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Evans C. L., Xie X. S., “Coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microscopy: chemical imaging for biology and medicine,” Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1, 883–909 (2008). 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Caspers P. J., et al. , “In vivo confocal Raman microspectroscopy of the skin: noninvasive determination of molecular concentration profiles,” J. Investig. Dermatol. 116(3), 434–42 (2001).. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01258.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen H., et al. , “A multimodal platform for nonlinear optical microscopy and microspectroscopy,” Opt. Express 17(3), 1282–90 (2009). 10.1364/OE.17.001282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gerritsen H. C., et al. , “Fluorescence lifetime imaging in scanning microscopy,” in Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, Pawley J., Ed., pp. 516–532, Springer, New York: (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Masood A., Ali Al-Jumaily A., “Computer aided diagnostic support system for skin cancer: a review of techniques and algorithms,” Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2013, 1–22 (2013). 10.1155/2013/323268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kantelhardt S. R., et al. , “Imaging of brain and brain tumor specimens by time-resolved multiphoton excitation microscopy ex vivo,” Neuro-Oncology 9(2), 103–112 (2007). 10.1215/15228517-2006-034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Imaging are provided here courtesy of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers

RESOURCES