Abstract
A molecular Solomon link was synthesized through the assembly of an interwoven molecular grid consisting of four bis(benzimidazolepyridyl)benzthiazolo[5,4-d]thiazole ligands and four zinc(II), iron(II), or cobalt(II) cations, followed by ring-closing olefin metathesis. NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and X-ray crystallography confirmed the doubly interlocked topology, and subsequent demetalation afforded the wholly organic Solomon link. The synthesis, in which each metal ion defines the crossing point of two ligand strands, suggests that interwoven molecular grids should be useful scaffolds for the rational construction of other topologically complex structures.
Keywords: catenanes, coordination chemistry, molecular grids, self-assembly, supramolecular chemistry
Knots and links are fundamental elements of structure, and have been exploited at the macroscopic level for millennia in the creation of tools (e.g. fishing nets) and materials (e.g. weaving), and in cultural and religious symbolism. Numerous biological examples illustrate how topological complexity at the molecular level can also confer significant physical and chemical properties (including improved strength, flexibility, stability, and dynamics).1 However, although the synthesis of the simplest [2]catenanes (singly interlocked rings; Hopf links2) has become almost routine,3 the rational synthesis of more complex topologies remains a very significant challenge.4 Of the higher-order molecular links prepared to date,5–7 about half were formed as unanticipated reaction products,6, 7b and there are currently only limited general strategies (e.g. via linear or cyclic helicates; Figure 1) for the rational construction of higher-order molecular links.
The next simplest link topology after the Hopf link is the Solomon link (a ${4_1^2 }$ link in Alexander-Briggs notation8), a [2]catenane comprised of doubly interlocked rings.2 Sauvage reported the first synthesis5b of a molecular Solomon link by connecting the end groups of extended linear metal helicates (Figure 1 a), however the distance between the ligand strand termini makes this approach unsuitable for extrapolating to higher-order knots and links.9 A one-pot strategy using a cyclic helicate scaffold to bring the end groups into closer proximity has also been described (Figure 1 b),5d the ligand strands joined through reversible imine formation, which provides a mechanism through which connectivity errors can be corrected.10 Several other Solomon links with metal-bridged5c,5f, 6b,6c,6f or wholly organic6a,6d,6e frameworks have also been isolated. Here we report on the designed synthesis of a Solomon link utilizing an interwoven 2×2 molecular grid to create a crossing point at the site of each metal ion (Figure 1 c).
Molecular grids, which are polytopic ligands coordinated to two-dimensional arrays of metal ions, have attracted interest because of their potential magnetic and electronic properties.11 However, almost all the examples prepared to date consist of discrete layers of ligands that lie to each side of the tier of metal ions. Interwoven grids are much rarer,12 but the crossing of the ligand strands in such systems make them, in principle, suitable scaffolds for constructing various interlocked structures.4e Connecting the adjacent termini of parallel ligand strands in an interwoven 2×2 grid should afford a Solomon link (Figure 1 c).
In our efforts to produce such a system, we initially investigated functionalized analogues of ligands previously shown to form interwoven 2×2 grids, but the derivatives we prepared had poor solubility profiles as either the free ligand or as metal complexes. In the search for a new interwoven-grid-forming ligand, we identified 1 as a potential candidate (Scheme 1). Ligand 1 contains two, antiparallel, tridentate binding sites formed from a thiazolo[5,4-d]thiazole (TTZ) core connected on each side to pyridylbenzimidazole units.13 A bis(bipyridyl)TTZ compound has previously been synthesized as a potential bis-tridentate ligand,14 but its coordination chemistry has not been reported. Ligand 1 has terminal alkene chains appropriate for macrocyclization of pairs of 1 by olefin metathesis. The length of the alkyl linker was chosen so as to permit only connections between parallel ligand strands in the grid coordination complex (see the Supporting Information, Figure S12). Isopentyl groups were integrated into the benzimidazole framework to aid the solubility of the ligand and its complexes.
Addition of an equimolar amount of Zn(BF4)2 in ethanol to a suspension of 1 in dichloromethane resulted in the rapid solubilization of the ligand and the quantitative assembly of complex [Zn414](BF4)8 (Scheme 1). 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure 2 b) showed the presence of a single species possessing the same two-fold symmetry as ligand 1. Chemical shift changes of proton signals Ha (Δδ=+0.92 ppm) and Hd (Δδ=−1.20 ppm) indicated the formation of octahedral bis(tridentate) complexes consistent with a grid structure. The diastereotopic splitting of protons Hi confirmed that the two faces of each ligand were in different environments, an inherent property of an interwoven 2×2 grid.
Olefin metathesis using the Hoveyda–Grubbs second-generation catalyst15 (0.1 equiv per olefin) was carried out on [Zn414](BF4)8 in a 3:1 mixture of dichloromethane/nitromethane (1.5 mm grid concentration). After 12 h at room temperature, the catalyst was quenched, the solvent removed under reduced pressure and, after trituration with chloroform, a complex characterized as [Zn42](BF4)8 was isolated in 72 % yield (92 % per bond). Multiply charged peaks corresponding to {[2](BF4)n}(8−n)+ (n=3–7) were observed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), thus confirming the loss of four ethylene molecules from the open complex (Figure S1). The olefin region of the 1H NMR spectrum of [Zn42](BF4)8 showed the terminal alkene signals (Hg and Hh; Figure 2 b) of [Zn414](BF4)8 had been replaced by a signal corresponding to an internal alkene (Figure 2 c). Broadening of some of the alkyl linker resonances (when compared to the open precursor, Zn414) and the more pronounced diastereotopic splitting of proton Hj may be a result of the restricted rotation of the connecting chain in the cyclized complex.
Single crystals of [Zn42](BF4)8 suitable for analysis by X-ray crystallography were obtained by slow vapor diffusion of diethyl ether into a saturated acetonitrile solution of the Solomon link. The solid-state structure16 (Figure 3) confirms the doubly entwined topology of the two 64-atom loops in [Zn42]8+. The eight aromatic rings of each ligand strand are rendered virtually co-planar by coordination to octahedral zinc(II) cations in the interwoven 2×2 grid motif. In turn, the four metal centers form a near-perfect square (Zn-Zn-Zn angles of 90(1)°), thus ensuring that the two ligand strands of each macrocycle are close-to-parallel and orthogonal to those of the other macrocycle. Although the 600 MHz 1H NMR spectrum of [Zn42](BF4)8 has only one signal for the alkene protons (Hg, Figure 2 c), the X-ray crystal structure indicates that a mixture of E and Z olefins form during the olefin metathesis reaction. Six of the eight BF4− anions were located in the structure (the remaining two are disordered over several sites), including one in the center of the Solomon link cavity (see the Supporting Information, Figures S10 and S11).
Demetalation of [Zn42](BF4)8 using Li2S17 proceeded smoothly to afford the wholly organic Solomon link 2 in 52 % yield (Scheme 1). Significant chemical shifts of protons Ha (Δδ=−1.25 ppm) and Hd (Δδ=+1.06 ppm) in the 1H NMR spectrum were consistent with the ligands being metal-free (Figure 2 d). The protonated molecular ions [2⋅n H]n+ (n=1–4) were observed by ESI-MS (Figure 4 a), and on fragmentation of the [2⋅H]+ ion by tandem mass spectrometry, a singly charged species with half the molecular weight of 2 was evident; one constituent ring of the [2]catenane (Figure 4 b).18
We successfully repeated the assembly of the grid and Solomon link using either Fe(BF4)2 or Co(BF4)2 in place of Zn(BF4)2 and obtained the corresponding Solomon link complexes in each case (see the Supporting Information).19 Demetalation of these analogues afforded Solomon link 2 in similar yields to the zinc(II) template synthesis. While the signals in the 1H NMR spectrum of [Fe414](BF4)8 in CD3CN at room temperature are sharp, those of [Fe42](BF4)8 are significantly broadened (Figure S2), thus indicating the presence of high-spin FeII species. Linking the ends of ligands in interwoven grids could prove useful for tuning systems that display spin-crossover behavior.20
In conclusion, ligand 1 can be quantitatively assembled into interwoven 2×2 molecular grids using several different octahedral first-row transition-metal ions. Ring-closing olefin metathesis covalently captures the entwined structure in high yield and subsequent removal of the cations affords the metal-free Solomon link. These results suggest that interwoven grids could form the basis of a general strategy for the rational synthesis of higher-order knots and links.4e The tolerance of the ligand system to different metal ions could potentially be used to impart magnetic,e electronic,11d,e, 20 or sensing21 properties to topologically complex molecular structures.
Supporting Information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
References
- 1.pp. 2129–2133.
- 1a.Wikoff WR, Liljas L, Duda RL, Tsuruta H, Hendrix RW, Johnson JE. Science. 2000;289 doi: 10.1126/science.289.5487.2129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1b.Taylor WR. Nature. 2000;406 doi: 10.1038/35022623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1c.Champoux JJ. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001;70 doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1d.Lee BI, Kim KH, Park SJ, Eom SH, Song HK, Suh SW. EMBO J. 2004;23 doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1e.Cao ZB, Roszak AW, Gourlay LJ, Lindsay JG, Isaacs NW. Structure. 2005;13 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1f.Boutz DR, Cascio D, Whitelegge J, Perry LJ, Yeates TO. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;368 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1g.Mallam AL. FEBS J. 2009;276 doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06801.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1h.Zimanyi CM, Ando N, Brignole EJ, Asturias FJ, Stubbe J, Drennan CL. Structure. 2012;20 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1i.van Eldijk MB, van Leeuwen I, Mikhailov VA, Neijenhuis L, Harhangi HR, van Hest JCM, Jetten MSM, den Camp HJMO, Robinson CV, Mecinović J. Chem. Commun. 2013;49 doi: 10.1039/c3cc43219j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adams CC. The knot book: an elementary introduction to the mathematical theory of knots. Providence, RI: American Mathematic Society; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 3. “Catenanes: Fifty Years of Molecular Links”: G. Gil-Ramírez, D. A. Leigh, A. J. Stephens, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed2015 DOI: doi/10.1002/anie.201411619Angew. Chem2015 DOI: doi/10.1002/ange.201411619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.pp. 5023–5035.
- 4a.Fenlon EE. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008 [Google Scholar]
- 4b.Beves JE, Blight BA, Campbell CJ, Leigh DA, McBurney RT. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50 doi: 10.1002/anie.201007963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2011;123 [Google Scholar]
- 4c.Forgan RS, Sauvage J-P, Stoddart JF. Chem. Rev. 2011;111 doi: 10.1021/cr200034u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4d.Sauvage J-P, Amabilino DB. Top. Curr. Chem. 2012;323 doi: 10.1007/128_2011_292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4e.Ayme J-F, Beves JE, Campbell CJ, Leigh DA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42 doi: 10.1039/c2cs35229j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.pp. 375–376. For rationally designed Solomon links, see:
- 5a.Nierengarten J-F, Dietrich-Buchecker CO, Sauvage J-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116 doi: 10.1021/ja00080a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5b.Dietrich-Buchecker C, Sauvage J-P. Chem. Commun. 1999 [Google Scholar]
- 5c.Ibukuro F, Fujita M, Yamaguchi K, Sauvage J-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121 [Google Scholar]
- 5d.Beves JE, Campbell CJ, Leigh DA, Pritchard RG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52 doi: 10.1002/anie.201302634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2013;125 [Google Scholar]
- 5e.Ayme J-F, Beves JE, Campbell CJ, Leigh DA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53 doi: 10.1002/anie.201404270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2014;126 [Google Scholar]
- 5f.Schouwey C, Holstein JJ, Scopelliti R, Zhurov KO, Nagornov KO, Tsybin YO, Smart OS, Bricogne G, Severin K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53 doi: 10.1002/anie.201407144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2014;126 a Solomon link formed from single-stranded DNA has also been described: [Google Scholar]
- 5g.Ciengshin T, Sha R, Seeman NC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50 doi: 10.1002/anie.201007685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2011;123 [Google Scholar]
- 6.pp. 218–222. For Solomon links formed unexpectedly, see:
- 6a.Pentecost CD, Chichak KS, Peters AJ, Cave GWV, Cantrill SJ, Stoddart JF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46 doi: 10.1002/anie.200603521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2007;119 [Google Scholar]
- 6b.McArdle CP, Jennings MC, Vittal JJ, Puddephatt RJ. Chem. Eur. J. 2001;7 doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20010817)7:16<3572::aid-chem3572>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6c.Peinador C, Blanco V, Quintela JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131 doi: 10.1021/ja8088372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6d.Prakasam T, Lusi M, Elhabiri M, Platas-Iglesias C, Olsen J-C, Asfari Z, Cianférani-Sanglier S, Debaene F, Charbonnière LJ, Trabolsi A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52 doi: 10.1002/anie.201302425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2013;125 [Google Scholar]
- 6e.Ponnuswamy N, Cougnon FBL, Pantoş GD, Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136 doi: 10.1021/ja4125884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6f.Frasconi M, Kikuchi T, Cao D, Wu Y, Liu W, Dyar SM, Barin G, Sarjeant AA, Stern CL, Carmieli R, Wang C, Wasielewski MR, Goddard WA, Stoddart JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;136 doi: 10.1021/ja504662a. for a related “Solomon cube” topology, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6g.Ronson TK, Fisher J, Harding LP, Rizkallah PJ, Warren JE, Hardie MJ. Nat. Chem. 2009;1 doi: 10.1038/nchem.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.pp. 1308–1312. For higher-order molecular links, see:
- 7a.Chichak KS, Cantrill SJ, Pease AR, Chiu S-H, Cave GWV, Atwood JL, Stoddart JF. Science. 2004;304 doi: 10.1126/science.1096914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7b.Huang S-L, Lin Y-J, Hor TSA, Jin G-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135 doi: 10.1021/ja402630g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7c.Huang S-L, Lin Y-J, Li Z-H, Jin G-X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53 doi: 10.1002/anie.201406193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2014;126 [Google Scholar]
- 7d.Leigh DA, Pritchard RG, Stephens AJ. Nat. Chem. 2014;6 doi: 10.1038/nchem.2056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7e.Zhu R, Lübben J, Dittrich B, Clever GH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54 doi: 10.1002/anie.201408068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2015;127 [Google Scholar]
- 7f.Wood CS, Ronson TK, Belenguer AM, Holstein JJ, Nitschke JR. Nat. Chem. 2015;7 doi: 10.1038/nchem.2205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alexander JW, Briggs GB. Ann. Math. 1926;28:562–586. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dietrich-Buchecker C, Colasson B, Jouvenot D, Sauvage J-P. Chem. Eur. J. 2005;11:4374–4386. doi: 10.1002/chem.200401264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.pp. 1538–1543.
- 10a.Leigh DA, Lusby PJ, Teat SJ, Wilson AJ, Wong JKY. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40 doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010417)40:8<1538::AID-ANIE1538>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2001;113 [Google Scholar]
- 10b.Hutin M, Schalley CA, Bernardinelli G, Nitschke JR. Chem. Eur. J. 2006;12 doi: 10.1002/chem.200501591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10c.Price JR, Clegg JK, Fenton RR, Lindoy LF, McMurtrie JC, Meehan GV, Parkin A, Perkins D, Turner P. Aust. J. Chem. 2009;62 [Google Scholar]
- 10d.Ayme J-F, Beves JE, Leigh DA, McBurney RT, Rissanen K, Schultz D. Nat. Chem. 2012;4 doi: 10.1038/nchem.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10e.Ayme J-F, Beves JE, Leigh DA, McBurney RT, Rissanen K, Schultz D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134 doi: 10.1021/ja303355v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.pp. 733–735.
- 11a.Youinou M-T, Rahmouni N, Fischer J, Osborn JA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1992;31 [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 1992;104 [Google Scholar]
- 11b.Baxter PN, Lehn J-M, Fischer J, Youinou M-T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994;33 [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 1994;106 [Google Scholar]
- 11c.Ruben M, Rojo J, Romero-Salguero FJ, Uppadine LH, Lehn J-M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43 doi: 10.1002/anie.200300636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2004;116 [Google Scholar]
- 11d.Dawe LN, Shuvaev KV, Thompson LK. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38 doi: 10.1039/b807219c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11e.Hardy JG. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42 doi: 10.1039/c3cs60061k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.pp. 971–972.
- 12a.Bu X-H, Morishita H, Tanaka K, Biradha K, Furusho S, Shionoya M. Chem. Commun. 2000 [Google Scholar]
- 12b.Bark T, Düggeli M, Stoeckli-Evans H, von Zelewsky A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40 doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010803)40:15<2848::AID-ANIE2848>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2001;113 [Google Scholar]
- 12c.Hausmann J, Brooker S. Chem. Commun. 2004 doi: 10.1039/b403905j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bevk D, Marin L, Lutsen L, Vanderzande D, Maes W. RSC Adv. 2013;3:11418–11431. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Slater JW, Steel PJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:6941–6943. [Google Scholar]
- 15.pp. 9973–9976.
- 15a.Gessler S, Randl S, Blechert S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41 [Google Scholar]
- 15b.Garber SB, Kingsbury JS, Gray BL, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122 [Google Scholar]
- 16. CCDC 1052083 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
- 17.Guo J, Mayers PC, Breault GA, Hunter CA. Nat. Chem. 2010;2:218–222. doi: 10.1038/nchem.544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dietrich-Buchecker C, Leize E, Nierengarten J-F, Sauvage J-P, Van Dorsselaer A. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994:2257–2258. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Manganese(II), nickel(II), copper(II), and cadmium(II) salts did not appear to promote the formation of interwoven grids.
- 20.pp. 2504–2507.
- 20a.Breuning E, Ruben M, Lehn J-M, Renz F, Garcia Y, Ksenofontov V, Gütlich P, Wegelius E, Rissanen K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000;39 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2000;112 [Google Scholar]
- 20b.Schneider B, Demeshko S, Dechert S, Meyer F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010;49 doi: 10.1002/anie.201001536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2010;122 [Google Scholar]
- 20c.Wang Y-T, Li S-T, Wu S-Q, Cui A-L, Shen D-Z, Kou H-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135 doi: 10.1021/ja312622c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20d.Zueva EM, Ryabikh ER, Borshch SA. Inorg. Chem. 2011;50 doi: 10.1021/ic2016929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20e.Schneider B, Demeshko S, Neudeck S, Dechert S, Meyer F. Inorg. Chem. 2013;52 doi: 10.1021/ic4021838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20f.Matsumoto T, Newton GN, Shiga T, Hayami S, Matsui Y, Okamoto H, Kumai R, Murakami Y, Oshio H. Nat. Commun. 2014;5 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Han Y, Chilton NF, Li M, Huang C, Xu H, Hou H, Moubaraki B, Langley SK, Batten SR, Fan Y, Murray HS. Chem. Eur. J. 2013;19:6321–6328. doi: 10.1002/chem.201204115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.