Abstract
Induction of mucosal IgA capable of providing a first line of defense against bacterial and viral pathogens remains a major goal of needle-free vaccines given via mucosal routes. Innate immune cells are known to play a central role in induction of IgA responses by mucosal vaccines, but the relative contribution of myeloid cell subsets to these responses has not firmly been established. Using an in vivo model of sublingual vaccination with Bacillus anthracis edema toxin (EdTx) as adjuvant, we examined the role of myeloid cell subsets for mucosal secretory IgA responses. Sublingual immunization of wild-type mice resulted in a transient increase of neutrophils in sublingual tissues and cervical lymph nodes. These mice later developed Ag-specific serum IgG responses, but not serum or mucosal IgA. Interestingly, EdTx failed to increase neutrophils in sublingual tissues of IKKβΔMye mice, and these mice developed IgA responses. Partial depletion of neutrophils before immunization of wild-type mice allowed the development of both mucosal and serum IgA responses. Finally, co-culture of B cells with neutrophils from either wild-type or IKKβΔMye mice suppressed production of IgA, but not IgM or IgG. These results identify a new role for neutrophils as negative regulators of IgA responses.
Keywords: Mucosal IgA, Bacillus anthracis edema toxin, vaccine adjuvant, neutrophils, IKKβ
INTRODUCTION
Mucosal surfaces are constantly exposed to microorganisms and represent the main portal of entry of pathogens and toxins. Mucosal IgA or secretory IgA (SIgA) neutralizes pathogenic microorganisms and toxins, interferes with bacterial or viral colonization of the epithelium, and participates in homeostasis of mucosal tissues 1. Ideally, vaccines capable of promoting both IgG in the bloodstream and SIgA in mucosal tissues would provide two layers of defense for optimal protection against infectious agents. Injected vaccines containing alum, the most widely used adjuvant, induce serum IgG responses, but unlike experimental mucosal adjuvants, fails to promote SIgA responses2, 3. Cholera toxin (CT) and the related heat labile toxin I of E. coli (LT) are the most studied experimental adjuvants for induction of SIgA 4, however, their inherent toxicity precludes their use in oral or nasal vaccines.
Cytokines play a crucial role in shaping the profile of T helper cytokine responses as well as the Ig isotype and subclass responses. Previous studies have shown that the mucosal adjuvant CT induces pro-inflammatory cytokine (i.e., IL-6 or IL-1β) secretion by antigen presenting cells (i.e., macrophages and dendritic cells) 5, 6. Cholera toxin also induces TGF-β and IL-10, two anti-inflammatory cytokines that play a central role in the induction of SIgA 6–8. Studies with live bacterial and viral vectors as well as immunization studies with Th1-inducing cytokines (i.e., IL-12 and IL-18) have now established that SIgA can also be induced in the context of Th1-biased responses 4. More recently, the ability of CT as adjuvant to promote SIgA responses was impaired in mice lacking IL-17A, suggesting a role for IL-17A or related signaling in SIgA responses 6. In this regard, differentiation of Th17 cells requires IL-1β, IL-6 and TGF-β6, 9, which are cytokines that support IgA responses. Unlike Th1 and Th2 cytokines, which activate JAK–STAT signaling pathways, signaling through IL-17R activates Act1 for subsequent activation of the classical NF-κB signaling pathway 10. Furthermore, IL-17A directly triggers Ig class switching to IgG2a and IgG3, but not to IgG1 11. To our knowledge, it is still unclear whether production of IgA is directly regulated by IL-17A/IL-17RA signaling in B cells.
The nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) pathway plays an important role in inflammatory responses and a number of stimuli can lead to NF-κB translocation to the nucleus 12. Previous studies have shown that the NF-κB pathway can mediate both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects 13, 14 depending on the immune cells in which the IKKβ-NF-κB signaling occurs 15 and stimuli to which they are exposed. A recent study showed a link between activation of the non-canonical NF-kB pathway in B cells and their ability to undergo immunoglobulin class switch for production of IgA 16. However, it remains unclear if IKKβ-dependent signaling in myeloid cells (IKKβΔMye) regulates IgA responses to mucosal vaccination.
Sublingual tissues have been used as a delivery site for bacterial and viral vaccines 17, 18, and cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) were identified as the primary site of antigen presentation after sublingual immunization 19. However, how innate immune cells in sublingual tissues and/or CLNs regulate antibody production remains unknown. Edema toxin (EdTx) is one of the exotoxins produced by the Gram-positive, spore-forming rod Bacillus anthracis 20. EdTx is composed of two subunits: a binding subunit and an enzymatic subunit. The binding subunit, or protective Ag (PA), allows the binding of these toxins to the anthrax toxin receptors that are expressed by most cells. The enzymatic subunit, or edema factor (EF), is a calmodulin- and calcium-dependent adenylate cyclase that catalyzes the conversion of ATP to cAMP 20, 21. We previously showed that EdTx is a mucosal adjuvant that promotes mucosal and systemic immunity to intranasally co-administered vaccine antigens 22, 23. These studies addressed the contribution of monocytes/macrophages to mucosal SIgA responses to sublingual immunization. Using Bacillus anthracis edema toxin (EdTx) as a model of vaccine adjuvant to target anthrax toxin receptors, we show a previously unknown role of neutrophils as negative regulators of IgA responses. Thus, recruitment of neutrophils into sublingual tissues shortly after sublingual immunization impaired the development of IgA responses. The negative role of neutrophils in IgA responses was confirmed in vivo by depletion of neutrophils before immunization with EdTx and in vitro, by co-culture of B cells with neutrophils.
RESULTS
Toxin adjuvants differentially recruit myeloid-lineage cells into sublingual tissues
Both CT 24 and EdTx 22, 23 are mucosal adjuvants that promote mucosal SIgA responses via the nasal route. CT can also promote IgA responses when used as adjuvant for vaccines given by the epicutaneous route or topically on the sublingual mucosa 19, 25. In contrast, EdTx was not effective at inducing IgA when used as an epicutaneous (Duverger et al, unpublished observation) or sublingual adjuvant. To elucidate the mechanism underlying the inability of EdTx to induce IgA by sublingual route, we first analyzed innate cell subsets present in sublingual tissues after sublingual application of EdTx. The number of CD11b+ myeloid cells increased in the sublingual tissues of mice 3 hours after application of EdTx, but not CT (Figure 1A). Flow cytometric 26 and morphologic analysis of the myeloid cell subsets (Figures S1, 1B, 1C, and 1D) in sublingual tissues 3 hours after application of EdTx showed high a frequency (32%) of CD11b+F4/80−Gr-1high cells (neutrophils), and a lower frequency (12%) of CD11b+F4/80+Gr-1− cells (non-inflammatory monocytes). The frequencies of CD11b+F4/80+Gr-1low cells (macrophages or DCs) and CD11b+F4/80+Gr-1high (inflammatory monocytes) were not affected by EdTx. In contrast with EdTx, CT increased the frequency (34% vs. 26%) of macrophages/DC (Figure 1C and 1D).
Figure 1. Cholera and edema toxin promote different profiles of myeloid cell subsets in sublingual tissues.
Sublingual tissues were collected 3 hours after sublingual administration of PBS, CT (2 μg) or EdTx (15 μg). (A) Flow cytometry analysis of total myeloid cells. Top: absolute number; Bottom: frequency of CD11b+ cells. (B) Gating strategy for identification of myeloid cell subsets (C) Detailed flow cytometry analysis of myeloid cell subsets. (D) Radar plots to summarize the profile of myeloid cell subsets in sublingual tissues. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=3). * p ≤ 0.05 compared with PBS.
Edema toxin does not recruit neutrophils into sublingual tissues of mice lacking IKKβ in myeloid cells
The adjuvant activities of CT and EdTx involve pro-inflammatory responses and acquisition of antigen-presenting cell functions by myeloid cells 22, 23, 27, 28. The transcription factor NF-κB is a master regulator of cytokine responses and migration of innate cells 29. We previously showed that activation of NF-κB in mouse epithelial cells lacking IKKβ, and with impaired ability for nuclear translocation of phospoNF-κB p65, resulted in increased pSTAT3 responses in gut tissues 30. Thus, we examined how EdTx affects the expression of STAT3 in sublingual tissues of control and IKKβΔMye mice, which lack IKKβ in myeloid cells. As depicted in Figures 2A and S2, pSTAT3 levels were low in tissues of mice that received saline and increased after application of EdTx. In contrast, pNF-κB levels were higher in tissues of PBS-than in EdTx-treated mice. Although the transcription factors appeared to be regulated in the opposite direction after EdTx-treatment, the difference in their levels of expression failed to reach statistical significance during the time frame analyzed (Figures 2A and S2).
Figure 2. Expression of phospho-NF-κB, phospho-STAT3, and profile of myeloid cell subsets in sublingual tissues after application of EdTx.
Sublingual tissues were collected at different time points after sublingual administration of PBS or EdTx (15 μg). (A) A representative Western-blot picture (from three independent experiments) of and β-actin and overall (cytoplasmic and nuclear) phospho-NF-κB p65 (pNF-κB p65), pSTAT3 levels in sublingual tissues 1 and 2 hours after administration of EdTx. (B and C) Flow cytometry analysis of myeloid cell subsets 3 and 6 hours after sublingual application of EdTx. All data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=3). * p ≤ 0.05 compared with PBS, and ▼ p ≤ 0.05 compared with C57BL/6.
We also analyzed myeloid cells in sublingual tissues at 3 and 6 hours after application of EdTx (Figures 2B, 2C and S3). Unlike control C57BL/6 mice, the IKKβΔMye mice did not exhibit an important increase in the frequency of CD11b+ cells in the sublingual tissues 3 hours after application of EdTx (Figure 2B). Control C57BL/6 and IKKβΔMye mice exhibited a similar proportion of myeloid cell subsets before application of EdTx, except for non-inflammatory monocytes, which were higher in IKKβΔMye than in control C57BL/6 mice (Figure 2C and Figure S3). Three hours after application of EdTx, sublingual tissues of IKKβΔMye mice showed significantly lower frequencies of neutrophils when compared to C57BL/6 (Figure 2C and Figure S3).
Edema toxin was reported to differentially affect the recruitment and cytokine secretion by some immune cells 31. Therefore, we also examined the expression of CCL2 and CXCL2, two chemokines known to recruit inflammatory monocytes and neutrophils, respectively. Sublingual tissue cells of control C57BL/6 and IKKβΔMye mice had similar basal levels of CCL2 and CXCL2 mRNA, and exhibited similar kinetics and magnitude of responses after exposure to EdTx (Figure S4). We also examined the expression of CCR2 and CXCR2, and CCL2 and CXCL2 receptors in myeloid cell subsets found in sublingual tissues 3 hours after application of EdTx in vivo (Figure 3). Since leukotriene B4 could mediate chemotaxis of macrophages and granulocytes 32, 33, the expression of the leukotriene B4 receptor (LTB4R2) was also investigated. Neutrophils collected in sublingual tissues of C57BL/6 and IKKβΔMye mice exhibited similar profiles of receptor expression (Figures 3B, 3C). On the other hand, macrophages/DCs and non-inflammatory monocytes collected in sublingual tissues of IKKβΔMye mice exhibited higher frequencies of CCR2+, CXCR2+ and LTB4R2+ cells. Alone, these results cannot explain the higher number of neutrophils in the sublingual tissues of C57BL/6. The pie diagram (Figure 3C), which summarizes the relative contribution of each receptor in myeloid cell subsets shows a broader profile of receptor expression in macrophages/DCs and non-inflammatory monocytes of IKKβΔMye mice. Thus, these cells may have a competitive advantage for responding to chemo-attractant signals via ligand binding to these receptors.
Figure 3. Expression of chemokine and leukotriene B4 receptors by myeloid cell subsets in sublingual tissues.
Sublingual tissues were collected 3 hours after sublingual application of PBS or EdTx (15 μg). Expression of CCR2, CXCR2 and LTB4R2 by myeloid cell subsets was analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Gating strategy for identification of chemoattractant receptors on myeloid cell subsets. (B) Percentage of receptor-positive cells. (C) Pie diagrams of relative expression of individual receptors were generated using the formula: Relative number=(% positive cells for a receptor x 1/Sum % positive cells for all receptors) x100. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=4). * p ≤ 0.05 receptor expression compared with C57BL/6 and ▼ p ≤ 0.05 compared with other receptors in the same group.
IKKβ deficiency in myeloid cells enhances the adjuvant activity of EdTx for sublingual immunization and promotes Ag-specific SIgA responses
We next asked whether the broader expression of chemokine and leukotriene B4 receptors by macrophage/DC and non-inflammatory monocytes in sublingual tissues of IKKβΔMye mice after application of EdTx could affect the profile of immune responses induced by this adjuvant. For this purpose, mice were immunized via the sublingual route with recombinant Yersinia pestis F1-V antigen and Bacillus anthracis EdTx as adjuvant. Sublingual co-application of EdTx enhanced antigen-specific serum IgG responses (IgG and IgG1) and no difference was seen between control C57BL/6 and IKKβΔMye mice (Figure 4A). The same levels of IgE responses were seen in control C57BL/6 and IKKβΔMye mice, suggesting that Th2- dependent Abs were not affected in IKKβΔMye mice. On the other hand, IKKβΔMye mice exhibited enhanced IgG2c responses (Figure 4A). Interestingly, unlike control C57BL/6 mice, IKKβΔMye mice developed antigen-specific serum IgA responses, (Figure 4A). The increase in serum IgA responses in IKKβΔMye mice was associated with antigen-specific SIgA in the saliva, vaginal washes, and fecal extracts (Figure 4B). We also asked whether the specificity and function of Ab induced by EdTx as sublingual adjuvant were affected by the absence of IKKβ-dependent signaling in myeloid cells. After sublingual immunization with F1-V alone, control C57BL/6 and IKKβΔMye mice developed IgG Abs, which were directed against the same peptide (i.e., P1–17 or P1) of the F1-capsular antigen (Figure 4C and Table 1). EdTx as adjuvant promoted Abs that reacted to two additional epitope peptides in control C57BL/6 and IKKβΔMye mice. However, only one of the additional peptides (P19) was shared by Abs from control C57BL/6 and IKKβΔMye mice (Figure 4C and Table 1).
Figure 4. Lack of IKKβ signaling in myeloid cells improves the adjuvant activity of EdTx after sublingual immunization and promotes antigen-specific SIgA responses.
Mice were immunized three times at weekly intervals by sublingual application of F1-V alone or F1-V plus EdTx as adjuvant. Serum, vaginal washes and fecal samples were collected 1 week (Day 21), and saliva samples, 2 weeks (Day 28) after the last immunization. F1-V-specific Ab responses were analyzed by ELISA. (A) F1-V-specific serum antibody responses; (B) F1-V-specific SIgA responses in mucosal secretions. The end-point titers were expressed as Log2 GMTs. ± SD from C57BL/6 (n=5), and IKKβΔMye mice (n=3–5). * p ≤ 0.05 compared with C57BL/6 and ▼ p ≤ 0.05 compared with group immunized with F1-V alone.
(C) F1 epitope-specific serum IgG responses in C57BL/6 (n=5) and IKKβΔMye mice (n=5). Sera were diluted 1:50 (groups immunized with F1-V alone) or 1:500 (groups immunized with F1-V plus EdTx), and IgG responses against linear epitopes of the capsular F1 antigen were analyzed by epitope-specific ELISA. Results were expressed as mean OD405nm ± SD. * p ≤ 0.05 compared with group immunized with F1-V alone.
Table 1.
Linear epitopes of Yersinia pestis F1 capsular antigen recognized by antibodies after sublingual immunization
Peptide | Residues | Sequence |
---|---|---|
P1 | 1 – 17 | MKKISSVIAIALFGTIA |
P2 | 7 – 23 | VIAIALFGTIATANAAD |
P18 | 103 – 119 | HQFTTKVIGKDSRDFDI |
P19 | 109 – 125 | VIGKDSRDFDISPKVNG |
P20 | 115 – 131 | RDFDISPKVNGENLVGD |
Mice were immunized three times at weekly intervals by sublingual application of F1-V alone or F1-V plus EdTx as adjuvant. Serum samples were collected one week (Day 21) after the last immunizatio, and B cell epitope responses evaluated by ELISA using overlapping peptides spamming the all F1 molecule (BEI Resources). Shown are the sequences and corresponding residues of peptides that reacted with sera of mice immunized with F1-V alone or F1-V plus EdTx as adjuvant.
We also wondered whether the enhanced IgA responses seen in IKKβΔMye mice were restricted to FI-V as antigen and EdTx as adjuvant. Nasal immunization with EdTx is known to promote immunity against the EdTx binding subunit PA 22, 23. Sublingual immunization with EdTx also enhanced PA-specific serum IgG Ab titers in IKKβΔMye mice (Figure S5A) and this was consistent with the enhanced levels of PA-specific neutralizing Abs (Figure S5B). In addition, we found that serum and mucosal IgA responses induced by cholera toxin as a sublingual adjuvant were enhanced in IKKβΔMye mice (Figure S6).
Finally, we analyzed antigen- (i.e., F1-V)-specific T helper cytokine responses supported by EdTx as an adjuvant for sublingual vaccination. In wild-type C57BL/6 mice, the sublingual adjuvant EdTx enhanced the frequency of antigen-specific IFN-γ producing T helper (Th) cells in the spleen (Figure 5). On the other hand, the IKKβΔMye mice exhibited a broader profile of Th cell-responses with a significant increase of antigen-specific IFN-γ+ (Th1), IL-4+ (Th2), and IL- 17A+ producing Th cells (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Lack of IKKβ in myeloid cells broadens antigen-specific T helper cytokine responses to sublingual immunization with EdTx as adjuvant.
Spleen cells were collected three weeks after the last immunization and cultured for 5 days in the presence of recombinant F1-V (5 μg/ml). The numbers of CD4+ T cells expressing Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokines were analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from C57BL/6 (n=4) and IKKβΔMye mice (n=4). * p ≤ 0.05 compared with C57BL/6, and ▼ p ≤ 0.05 compared with mice immunized with F1-V alone.
The frequency of neutrophils inversely correlates with production of IgA in cervical lymph nodes
Cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) are considered inductive sites for adaptive immune responses after sublingual 19 and nasal 34 immunization. We have shown that 6 hours after application of EdTx, the frequency of CD11b+ cells returned toward basal levels in sublingual tissues (Figure 2B). We hypothesized that cells had migrated to CLN and analyzed myeloid cell subsets in these lymphoid tissues. The frequency of neutrophils was significantly reduced in CLNs of IKKβΔMye compared to control C57BL/6 mice, while the other myeloid cell subsets remained unchanged (Figure 6A). CLN cells from EdTx-treated mice were then cultured in the presence of LPS. Three days later, we found a significantly higher number of IgA-secreting cells in IKKβΔMye than in control C57BL/6 mice (Figure 6B). Of interest, the number of IgA-secreting cells in the CLNs of both control C57BL/6 and IKKβΔMye mice were inversely correlated (r= −0.8) with the numbers of neutrophils in these tissues (Figure 6C).
Figure 6. Inverse correlation between the number of neutrophils and IgA responses to sublingual immunization.
(A, B, C) Cervical lymph nodes were collected at 6 hours after sublingual administration of EdTx (15 μg). (A) Flow cytometry analysis of myeloid cell subsets. (B) CLN cells were further cultured for 3 days in the presence of LPS (5 μg/ml) and Ab-secreting cells analyzed by ELISPOT. (C) Linear-regression models to correlate the frequency of neutrophils and number of Ig isotype-secreting cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=4). * p ≤ 0.05 compared with C57BL/6.
(D) Wild-type C57BL/6 mice were treated by ip administration of the neutrophil Ly6G-specific 1A8 monoclonal Ab (1A8+C57BL/6 mice). Two days later, control C57BL/6, and IKKβΔMye mice were immunized three times at weekly intervals by sublingual application of F1-V plus EdTx. F1-V-specific IgA Ab responses in serum and fecal samples were analyzed by ELISA and end-point titers were expressed as Log2 GMTs. ± SD. * p ≤ 0.05 compared with C57BL/6 in each day (n=5).
Reduction of neutrophils augmented the adjuvant effect of EdTx on Ag-specific IgA responses
In order to further establish that an inverse correlation exists between the frequency of neutrophils in sublingual tissues and CLNs, and antigen-specific IgA responses, wild-type C57BL/6 were injected (i.p) with a neutrophil Ly6G-specific 1A8 monoclonal Ab 2 days before sublingual immunization with F1-V and EdTx as adjuvant. This treatment reduced the frequency of neutrophils in CLNs of wild-type C57BL/6 mice (Figure S7A) and C57BL/6 mice pre-treated with 1A8 (1A8+C57BL/6) contained virtually no neutrophils in sublingual tissues after application of EdTx (Figure S7B). These 1A8+C57BL/6 mice also gradually developed F1-V-specific serum IgA titers over the time points tested and reached higher serum IgA titers than non-treated C57BL/6 or IKKβΔMye mice at Day 28 (Figure 6D). Interestingly, depletion of neutrophils also enhanced mucosal IgA Ab-responses; 1A8+C57BL/6 mice produced high levels of F1-V-specific fecal IgA Abs, which were comparable to those measured in IKKβΔMye mice (Figure 6D).
Neutrophils suppress production of IgA by B cells
Our results clearly show that the ability to generate IgA responses is enhanced in the absence of IKKβ in myeloid cells or when the number of neutrophils is reduced. In addition, the ability of EdTx to induce systemic and mucosal IgA responses in IKKβΔMye mice is associated with increased Th17 responses and production of IL-17A (Figure 5). Thus, we next examined how alteration of canonical NF-κB mediated-signaling via IKKβ-deletion in myeloid cells (IKKβΔMye) could support Ig class switch and antibody production by B cells. For this purpose, CD11b-depleted spleen cells from C57BL/6 mice were co-cultured with 20% autologous CD11b+ cells (C57BL/6 CD11b+) or CD11b+ cells from IKKβΔMye mice (IKKβΔMye CD11b+) with or without EdTx in the presence of LPS 35. After 5 days of culture, cells were segregated into IL-17RAlow and IL-17RAhigh cells (Figure S8A). Co-culture with IKKβΔMye CD11b+ cells significantly increased the frequency of B220+IL-17RAhigh B cells (Figure S8B). As shown in Figure 7A, in these cultures contained low frequencies of surface IgA cells among IL-17RAlow B cells regardless of the presence of IKKβΔMye CD11b+ cells. Interestingly, high frequencies of IL- 17RAhigh B cells expressed surface IgA and co-culture with IKKβΔMye CD11b+ cells further increased these frequencies. To further elucidate signals that supported IgA responses, we analyzed mRNA levels of the B cell activators APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) and BAFF (B cell activation factor of the TNF family) and activation-induced deaminase (AID). Addition of EdTx to cultures of spleen cells enhanced mRNA levels of APRIL, BAFF and AID, and the presence of IKKβΔMye CD11b+ further enhanced BAFF- and AID-specific mRNA expression (Figure S8C). The presence of IKKβΔMye CD11b+ did not affect EdTx-induced IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA levels, but increased EdTx-induced TNF-α, IL-23, IL-10, and Caspase-1 mRNA levels (Figure S9). Taken together, these results show that myeloid cells lacking IKKβ provide a microenvironment favorable for Ig class switch and B cell production of IgA.
Figure 7. Neutrophils suppress production of IgA by B cells.
(A) CD11b− spleen cells from C57BL/6 mice were co-cultured with autologous CD11b+ cells from C57BL/6 or heterologous CD11b+IKKβΔMye cells in the presence of LPS (5 μg/ml) with or without EdTx (2 μg/ml). The frequencies of expression of IgA+ among B220+IL-17RAlow and B220+IL-17RAhigh subpopulations were analyzed by flow cytometry after 5 days of co-culture with autologous or heterologous CD11b+ cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=4). * p ≤ 0.05 compared with C57BL/6 CD11b+ cells.
(B and C) CD19+ splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice were incubated overnight with 100 ng/ml of LPS, washed extensively and then co-cultured with autologous neutrophils from C57BL/6 mice or heterologous neutrophils from IKKβΔMye mice without additional stimuli.
(B) IgM, IgG, and IgA levels in 5-day culture supernatants as determined by ELISA. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=4). * p ≤ 0.05 compared with CD19+ B cells cultured alone.
(C–D) mRNA levels of IgA heavy chain determined by real time RT-PCR after 24 hours of culture. (C) Individual mRNA levels in three independent experiments. (D) Relative mRNA levels from co-culture of B cells with neutrophils as a percentage of mRNA levels in cultures of CD19+ B cells alone (n=3). * p ≤ 0.05 compared with CD19+ B cells cultured alone.
To gain insight into the mechanism of how neutrophils affect IgA responses, B cells from C57BL/6 mice were co-cultured with or without neutrophils from C57BL/6 or IKKβΔMye mice for 5 days. The addition of neutrophils from either C57BL/6 or IKKβΔMye mice to cultures of B cells did not affect the secretion of IgM or IgG Abs into culture supernatants (Figure 7B). Interestingly, co-culture with neutrophils significantly reduced the amounts of IgA Abs secreted by B cells and this inhibitory effect was independent of the presence of functional IKKβ in neutrophils (Figure 7B). Finally, mRNA analysis of B cells co-cultured with neutrophils showed that neutrophils reduced the level of IgA heavy chain transcripts in B cells (Figure 7C).
DISCUSSION
Recent studies have identified sublingual immunization as a potentially safer alternative to nasal immunization. However, inductive sites for generating immune responses to sublingual immunization, the identity and function of the cells involved, and the signaling pathways for induction of SIgA via this mucosal route are poorly understood. Here we show that the ability of a sublingual vaccine to mount an SIgA response inversely correlates with the presence of neutrophils in sublingual tissue and CLNs. We also show that depletion of Gr1+ cells improves the development of IgA responses after sublingual immunization and that neutrophils impair the transcription of IgA heavy chain by B cells. This work also shows that myeloid cells lacking IKKβ-dependent NF-κB signaling provide an environment that supports the production of IgA by B cells.
Alum is the most widely used adjuvant for injected vaccines. However, attempts to include alum in mucosal vaccines aimed at prompting SIgA responses have been unsuccessful because this adjuvant fails to effectively induce IgA 2. Studies that addressed mechanisms underlying the adjuvant activity of alum have shown that alum acts via Gr1+splenic myeloid cells expressing IL-4 to stimulate early B cell priming 36. Other studies have shown that the NALP3 inflammasome was a crucial element in the adjuvant activity of alum by promoting the maturation of inflammatory cytokines 37; and furthermore, alum recruits inflammatory monocytes 38. In other studies, intranasal co-administration of human neutrophil proteins enhanced antigen-specific serum IgG responses, but failed to promote SIgA responses 39. These reports are consistent with our finding that less recruitment of neutrophils into sublingual tissues and CLNs of IKKβΔMye mice is a reliable indication of the ability of EdTx as adjuvant to promote SIgA responses. Because IgG production is not impaired by the recruitment of neutrophils, it is unlikely that neutrophils limit SIgA responses by limiting antigen access to antigen presenting cells or interactions between the latter and T cells as was previously suggested 40. Induction of SIgA is well-known to require priming of effector cells in unique inductive sites 4. Thus, our finding that the lower proportion of Gr-1+ inflammatory monocytes and/or higher proportion of Gr-1− non-inflammatory monocytes in the sublingual tissue correlates with induction of broad Ab responses consisting of both serum IgG and SIgA responses is in agreement with the recent report that neutrophils also control the spread of T cell responses to distant lymph nodes 41. The Gr-1− monocytes, also described as tissue resident myeloid cells, have been classified as alternatively activated macrophages (M2 macrophages) capable of producing IL-10 and TGF-β 26, 42. Interestingly, these two cytokines are central for Ig class switch in B cells and for production of IgA.
Experiments using IKKβΔMye mice provided new insights into signaling in the induction of SIgA responses. Previous studies have shown that the NF-κB pathway can mediate both pro-and anti-inflammatory effects 13, 14. Our data suggest that activation of IKKβ-NF-κB signaling in myeloid cells may in fact reduce their capacity to help B cells undergo Ig class switch for production of IgA. This finding is interesting in light of the recent report that the kinase TBK1 in B cells limits IgA class switch by negative regulation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway 16. Thus, stimulation of non-canonical NF-κB signaling either directly in B cells or in other antigen presenting cells could represent a major pathway for induction of IgA Abs. In this regard, we have recently shown that IKKβ deficiency in intestinal epithelial cells increases IgA responses induced by cholera toxin used as an oral adjuvant 43. The notion that IKKβ can reduce or suppress the functions of macrophages or DCs is consistent with previous studies by others suggesting that IKKβ may suppress activation of M1 macrophages during infections through inhibition of STAT-1 15. In those studies, deletion of IKKβ in macrophages increased STAT-1 activation and promoted a shift toward the M1 phenotype, characterized by increased production of pro-inflammatory and inflammatory cytokines, i.e., IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-12 and IFN-γ and iNOS in response to intraperitoneal injection of Group B streptococcus or E. coli LPS 13, 15. While our studies showed enhanced antigen-specific Th1 cytokine responses in IKKβΔMye mice after sublingual immunization, the most striking observation was the enhanced IL-17 response.
The IKKβΔMye mice were useful tools that helped us identify the repressive effect of neutrophils on IgA responses. Analysis of chemokine receptors on myeloid cell subsets in sublingual tissues revealed a broader expression of CCR2, CxCR2 and LTB4R2 on macrophages/DC and non-inflammatory monocytes from IKKβΔMye mice. One can speculate that this pattern of receptor expression could improve cellular responses to corresponding ligands and facilitate migration to inductive sites and support IgA responses. Previous studies have shown that injection of alum recruits neutrophils and induces the formation of nodules consistent with those of extracellular DNA traps 44. A recent report showed that formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) requires phosphorylation of p65 NFκB 45. However, NETs are primarily known to be involved in the killing of pathogens 46. Furthermore, our results showing that neutrophils from both wild-type and IKKβΔMye mice suppress transcription of IgA heavy chain suggest the involvement of other mechanisms, which will be addressed in future studies.
Nasal immunization with the cAMP-inducing adjuvant CT 6 or E.coli heat labile toxin I 47 promotes Th17 responses. Here we show that EdTx as a sublingual adjuvant promotes antigen-specific Th17 responses in CLNs and spleen, and is associated with in vitro induction of IL-1β and IL-6. The hallmark cytokine produced by Th17 cells is IL-17A 48. Unlike most T helper cell-derived cytokines, IL-17 does not activate JAK-STAT 10, but engages Act1 leading to activation of IKKβ and downstream NF-κB, C/EBP, and AP-1, which in turn lead to expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines 49, 50. Recently, it has been suggested that Th17 cells stimulate B cell proliferation and Ig class switch for enhanced Ab production 11. We have shown that CD11b+ cells from IKKβΔMye mice increase specific B cell populations, i.e., IL-17RAhigh B cells, and that the IL-17RAhigh B cells express higher levels of surface IgA. IL-17A was reported to act as helper for the development of germinal centers 51. Our results suggest that IKKβΔMye cells stimulate B cells to be more responsive to IL-17A. This pathway could be one of the mechanisms that rescues the mucosal adjuvant EdTx and induction of SIgA Abs.
The limited understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms that regulate IgA responses has hampered the development of safe mucosal vaccines capable to promote mucosal IgA production. Using an experimental vaccine adjuvant that does not normally induce SIgA after sublingual immunization, we showed that IKKβ is one of the key regulatory pathways for induction of SIgA responses by sublingual vaccines. We also showed that neutrophils negatively regulate IgA production by B cells, an effect that can be countered by Gr1− myeloid cells lacking a functional IKKβ. Our results provide new insights for the development of sublingual vaccines that can promote both IgA at mucosal surfaces and IgG in the blood stream for optimal protection against infectious agents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice
Control C57BL/6 mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) or NCI-Frederick (Frederick, MD) and acclimated to our facility for at least two weeks before being used. IKKβΔMye mice were kindly provided by Dr. Karin (University of California at San Diego) and were generated by crossing LysMCre mice expressing Cre down-stream of the lysozyme promoter in myeloid lineage cells with IKKβf/f mice harboring a loxP-flanked IKKβ gene 13, 14 Mice were bred in our facility, maintained in a pathogen-free environment and were used at 8–12 weeks of age. All experiments were performed in co-housed mice in accordance with both NIH and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines.
Immunization and sample collection
The F1-V antigen and Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (PA) and edema factor (EF) were obtained from BEI Resources (Manassas, VA). Mice were immunized three times, i.e., days 0, 7, and 14 by sublingual application of 30 μl of PBS containing 50 μg of F1-V antigen alone, or 50 μg of F1-V antigen plus 15 μg EdTx, i.e., 15 μg PA and 15 μg EF. Blood and external secretions (fecal extracts, vaginal washes, and saliva) were collected as previously described 24. In selected experiments, mice were injected i.p. with 0.5 mg of the neutrophil Ly6G-specific 1A8 monoclonal Ab (BioXCell) 2 days before the sublingual immunization. Neutrophils were isolated from bone marrow and blood using a 62% Percoll gradient, followed by MACS-sorting with the aid of CD11b microbeads.
Other materials and methods
Other methods were previously reported and are summarized in the supplementary materials. These methods include ELISA 22, 23, ELISPOT 24, macrophage toxicity assay 22, 23, in vitro cultures and flow cytometry analysis, and quantitative real-time RT-PCR 22, 30.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 AI043197 and R01 AT006552 to PNB), and a fellowship from Fondation Lelous, France (to A.BB). The authors thank Dr. Michael Karin for providing IKKβ deficient mice and Dr. Kate Hayes-Ozello for editorial assistance.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
References
- 1.Macpherson AJ, McCoy KD, Johansen FE, Brandtzaeg P. The immune geography of IgA induction and function. Mucosal Immunol. 2008;1(1):11–22. doi: 10.1038/mi.2007.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jackson EM, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Intranasal vaccination with murabutide enhances humoral and mucosal immune responses to a virus-like particle vaccine. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lo DD, Ling J, Eckelhoefer AH. M cell targeting by a Claudin 4 targeting peptide can enhance mucosal IgA responses. BMC biotechnology. 2012;12:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-12-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boyaka PN, McGhee JR, Czerkinsky C, Mestecky J. Mucosal vaccines: an overview. In: Mestecky J, editor. Mucosal Immunology. Vol. 1. Elsevier, Acadamic Press; San Diego, CA: 2005. pp. 855–874. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cong Y, Oliver AO, Elson CO. Effects of cholera toxin on macrophage production of costimulatory cytokines. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31(1):64–71. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200101)31:1<64::aid-immu64>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Datta SK, Sabet M, Nguyen KP, Valdez PA, Gonzalez-Navajas JM, Islam S, et al. Mucosal adjuvant activity of cholera toxin requires Th17 cells and protects against inhalation anthrax. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(23):10638–10643. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002348107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Defrance T, Vanbervliet B, Briere F, Durand I, Rousset F, Banchereau J. Interleukin 10 and transforming growth factor beta cooperate to induce anti-CD40-activated naive human B cells to secrete immunoglobulin A. J Exp Med. 1992;175(3):671–682. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.3.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim PH, Eckmann L, Lee WJ, Han W, Kagnoff MF. Cholera toxin and cholera toxin B subunit induce IgA switching through the action of TGF-beta 1. J Immunol. 1998;160(3):1198–1203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Harrington LE, Hatton RD, Mangan PR, Turner H, Murphy TL, Murphy KM, et al. Interleukin 17-producing CD4+ effector T cells develop via a lineage distinct from the T helper type 1 and 2 lineages. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(11):1123–1132. doi: 10.1038/ni1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gaffen SL. Structure and signalling in the IL-17 receptor family. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(8):556–567. doi: 10.1038/nri2586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mitsdoerffer M, Lee Y, Jager A, Kim HJ, Korn T, Kolls JK, et al. Proinflammatory T helper type 17 cells are effective B-cell helpers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14292–14297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009234107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vallabhapurapu S, Karin M. Regulation and function of NF-kappaB transcription factors in the immune system. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:693–733. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Greten FR, Arkan MC, Bollrath J, Hsu LC, Goode J, Miething C, et al. NF-kappaB is a negative regulator of IL-1beta secretion as revealed by genetic and pharmacological inhibition of IKKbeta. Cell. 2007;130(5):918–931. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lawrence T, Gilroy DW, Colville-Nash PR, Willoughby DA. Possible new role for NF-kappaB in the resolution of inflammation. Nat Med. 2001;7(12):1291–1297. doi: 10.1038/nm1201-1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fong CH, Bebien M, Didierlaurent A, Nebauer R, Hussell T, Broide D, et al. An antiinflammatory role for IKKbeta through the inhibition of “classical” macrophage activation. J Exp Med. 2008;205(6):1269–1276. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jin J, Xiao Y, Chang JH, Yu J, Hu H, Starr R, et al. The kinase TBK1 controls IgA class switching by negatively regulating noncanonical NF-kappaB signaling. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(11):1101–1109. doi: 10.1038/ni.2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Raghavan S, Ostberg AK, Flach CF, Ekman A, Blomquist M, Czerkinsky C, et al. Sublingual immunization protects against Helicobacter pylori infection and induces T and B cell responses in the stomach. Infect Immun. 2010;78(10):4251–4260. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00536-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Song JH, Nguyen HH, Cuburu N, Horimoto T, Ko SY, Park SH, et al. Sublingual vaccination with influenza virus protects mice against lethal viral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(5):1644–1649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708684105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Song JH, Kim JI, Kwon HJ, Shim DH, Parajuli N, Cuburu N, et al. CCR7-CCL19/CCL21-regulated dendritic cells are responsible for effectiveness of sublingual vaccination. J Immunol. 2009;182(11):6851–6860. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moayeri M, Leppla SH. The roles of anthrax toxin in pathogenesis. Current opinion in microbiology. 2004;7(1):19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2003.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tang WJ, Guo Q. The Adenylyl Cyclase Activity of Anthrax Edema Factor. Mol Aspects Med. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Duverger A, Carre JM, Jee J, Leppla SH, Cormet-Boyaka E, Tang WJ, et al. Contributions of edema factor and protective antigen to the induction of protective immunity by Bacillus anthracis edema toxin as an intranasal adjuvant. J Immunol. 2010;185(10):5943–5952. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Duverger A, Jackson RJ, van Ginkel FW, Fischer R, Tafaro A, Leppla SH, et al. Bacillus anthracis edema toxin acts as an adjuvant for mucosal immune responses to nasally administered vaccine antigens. J Immunol. 2006;176(3):1776–1783. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Boyaka PN, Ohmura M, Fujihashi K, Koga T, Yamamoto M, Kweon MN, et al. Chimeras of labile toxin one and cholera toxin retain mucosal adjuvanticity and direct Th cell subsets via their B subunit. J Immunol. 2003;170(1):454–462. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cuburu N, Kweon MN, Song JH, Hervouet C, Luci C, Sun JB, et al. Sublingual immunization induces broad-based systemic and mucosal immune responses in mice. Vaccine. 2007;25(51):8598–8610. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.09.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Geissmann F, Jung S, Littman DR. Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity. 2003;19(1):71–82. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00174-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bromander AK, Kjerrulf M, Holmgren J, Lycke N. Cholera toxin enhances alloantigen presentation by cultured intestinal epithelial cells. Scand J Immunol. 1993;37(4):452–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1993.tb03318.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McGee DW, Beagley KW, Aicher WK, McGhee JR. Transforming growth factor-beta and IL-1 beta act in synergy to enhance IL-6 secretion by the intestinal epithelial cell line, IEC-6. J Immunol. 1993;151(2):970–978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Grivennikov SI, Karin M. Dangerous liaisons: STAT3 and NF-kappaB collaboration and crosstalk in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21(1):11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bonnegarde-Bernard A, Jee J, Fial MJ, Aeffner F, Cormet-Boyaka E, Davis IC, et al. IKKbeta in intestinal epithelial cells regulates allergen-specific IgA and allergic inflammation at distant mucosal sites. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7(2):257–267. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Klezovich-Benard M, Corre JP, Jusforgues-Saklani H, Fiole D, Burjek N, Tournier JN, et al. Mechanisms of NK cell-macrophage Bacillus anthracis crosstalk: a balance between stimulation by spores and differential disruption by toxins. PLoS pathogens. 2012;8(1):e1002481. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Grespan R, Fukada SY, Lemos HP, Vieira SM, Napimoga MH, Teixeira MM, et al. CXCR2-specific chemokines mediate leukotriene B4-dependent recruitment of neutrophils to inflamed joints in mice with antigen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(7):2030–2040. doi: 10.1002/art.23597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chou RC, Kim ND, Sadik CD, Seung E, Lan Y, Byrne MH, et al. Lipid-cytokine-chemokine cascade drives neutrophil recruitment in a murine model of inflammatory arthritis. Immunity. 2010;33(2):266–278. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kraal G. Nasal-Associated Lymphoid Tissue. In: Mestecky J, Lamm ME, Strober W, Bienenstock J, McGhee JR, Mayer L, editors. Mucosal Immunology. Vol. 1. Elsevier, Academic Press; San Diego, CA: 2005. pp. 415–422. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lycke N, Strober W. Cholera toxin promotes B cell isotype differentiation. J Immunol. 1989;142(11):3781–3787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jordan MB, Mills DM, Kappler J, Marrack P, Cambier JC. Promotion of B cell immune responses via an alum-induced myeloid cell population. Science. 2004;304(5678):1808–1810. doi: 10.1126/science.1089926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Eisenbarth SC, Colegio OR, O’Connor W, Sutterwala FS, Flavell RA. Crucial role for the Nalp3 inflammasome in the immunostimulatory properties of aluminium adjuvants. Nature. 2008;453(7198):1122–1126. doi: 10.1038/nature06939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kool M, Soullie T, van Nimwegen M, Willart MA, Muskens F, Jung S, et al. Alum adjuvant boosts adaptive immunity by inducing uric acid and activating inflammatory dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2008;205(4):869–882. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lillard JW, Jr, Boyaka PN, Chertov O, Oppenheim JJ, McGhee JR. Mechanisms for induction of acquired host immunity by neutrophil peptide defensins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(2):651–656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yang CW, Strong BS, Miller MJ, Unanue ER. Neutrophils influence the level of antigen presentation during the immune response to protein antigens in adjuvants. J Immunol. 2010;185(5):2927–2934. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yang CW, Unanue ER. Neutrophils control the magnitude and spread of the immune response in a thromboxane A2-mediated process. J Exp Med. 2013;210(2):375–387. doi: 10.1084/jem.20122183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Martinez FO, Helming L, Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:451–483. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bonnegarde-Bernard A, Jee J, Fial MJ, Aeffner F, Cormet-Boyaka E, Davis IC, et al. IKK β in intestinal epithelial cells regulates allergen-specific IgA and allergic inflammation at distant mucosal sites. Mucosal Immunol. 2013 doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.43. (In press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Munks MW, McKee AS, Macleod MK, Powell RL, Degen JL, Reisdorph NA, et al. Aluminum adjuvants elicit fibrin-dependent extracellular traps in vivo. Blood. 2010;116(24):5191–5199. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-275529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lapponi MJ, Carestia A, Landoni VI, Rivadeneyra L, Etulain J, Negrotto S, et al. Regulation of neutrophil extracellular trap formation by anti-inflammatory drugs. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2013;345(3):430–437. doi: 10.1124/jpet.112.202879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Branzk N, Papayannopoulos V. Molecular mechanisms regulating NETosis in infection and disease. Semin Immunopathol. 2013;35(4):513–530. doi: 10.1007/s00281-013-0384-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Brereton CF, Sutton CE, Ross PJ, Iwakura Y, Pizza M, Rappuoli R, et al. Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin promotes protective Th17 responses against infection by driving innate IL-1 and IL-23 production. J Immunol. 2011;186(10):5896–5906. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Korn T, Bettelli E, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK. IL-17 and Th17 Cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:485–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maitra A, Shen F, Hanel W, Mossman K, Tocker J, Swart D, et al. Distinct functional motifs within the IL-17 receptor regulate signal transduction and target gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(18):7506–7511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611589104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.May MJ. IL-17R signaling: new players get in on the Act1. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(9):813–815. doi: 10.1038/ni.2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hsu HC, Yang P, Wang J, Wu Q, Myers R, Chen J, et al. Interleukin 17-producing T helper cells and interleukin 17 orchestrate autoreactive germinal center development in autoimmune BXD2 mice. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(2):166–175. doi: 10.1038/ni1552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.