Background: FBXO32 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that plays important roles in tumorigenesis and muscle atrophy.
Results: c-Myc was found to be a target of FBXO32 for proteasomal degradation.
Conclusion: FBXO32 targets Lys-326 of c-Myc to form polyubiquitin chains, resulting in inhibition of cell proliferation.
Significance: FBXO32 may mediate c-Myc proteasomal degradation.
Keywords: cell proliferation, muscle atrophy, Myc (c-Myc), oncogene, ubiquitylation (ubiquitination), FBXO32, proteasomal degradation
Abstract
FBXO32 (MAFbx/Atrogin-1) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is markedly up-regulated in muscle atrophy. Although some data indicate that FBXO32 may play an important role in tumorigenesis, the molecular mechanism of FBXO32 in tumorigenesis has been poorly understood. Here, we present evidence that FBXO32 targets the oncogenic protein c-Myc for ubiquitination and degradation through the proteasome pathway. Phosphorylation of c-Myc at Thr-58 and Ser-62 is dispensable for FBXO32 to induce c-Myc degradation. Mutation of the lysine 326 in c-Myc reduces c-Myc ubiquitination and prevents the c-Myc degradation induced by FBXO32. Furthermore, overexpression of FBXO32 suppresses c-Myc activity and inhibits cell growth, but knockdown of FBXO32 enhances c-Myc activity and promotes cell growth. Finally, we show that FBXO32 is a direct downstream target of c-Myc, highlighting a negative feedback regulation loop between c-Myc and FBXO32. Thus, FBXO32 may function by targeting c-Myc. This work explains the function of FBXO32 and highlights its mechanisms in tumorigenesis.
Introduction
FBXO32 (also known as MAFbx or Atrogin-1) was originally identified as a muscle-specific gene required for muscle atrophy (1, 2). FBXO32 was designated as a muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase because it contains the F-box domain. This is a characteristic of E3 ligases that function as one component of a SCF (Skp1, Cullin, F-box protein) ubiquitin ligase complex (1, 2). FBXO32 lacks leucine-rich repeats or WD40 repeats but it does contain a class II PDZ domain (2), which interacts with specific sequences at the carboxyl terminus of the target proteins (3, 4). In addition, FBXO32 also contains two nuclear localization signals, which suggests that it may target transcription factors or other nuclear proteins for ubiquitination (5).
As an ubiquitin E3 ligase, FBXO32 has been shown to target several proteins for proteasomal degradation (6–8). The two most widely known targets of FBXO32 in skeletal muscle are the initiation factor, eIF3-f, and the myogenic regulatory factor, MyoD. In addition to targeting the proteins mediating FBXO32 function in muscle atrophy, FBXO32 also targets MKPK phosphatase-1 for proteasomal degradation and is probably involved in ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis (8).
Some evidence suggests that FBXO32 might also play an important role in tumorigenesis. The expression level of FBXO32 is closely correlated with the methylation status of the FBXO32 promoter in ovarian cancer cell lines (9). Restoration of FBXO32 in ovarian cancer cells inhibits colony formation in vitro and xenograft tumor growth in athymic nude mice. Moreover, patients with higher FBXO32 promoter methylation tend to have shorter progression-free survival. This suggests a tumor-suppressive role of FBXO32 (9). In addition, the FBXO32 expression is also decreased in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (10). EZH2 supports the survival of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma by repressing FBXO32 (11), but, up-regulation of FBXO32 is a hallmark of cancer cachexia caused by muscle wasting (12, 13). Therefore, the role of FBXO32 in tumorigenesis is still unclear, and the underlying mechanism is poorly understood.
c-Myc is a short-lived protein and a classic oncogene regulated at multiple steps. One of the most prominent mechanisms for c-Myc degradation in cells is through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (14). As a component of the RING finger domain, ubiquitin ligase complex (15, 16), Fbw7 is the best studied SCF-type E3 ubiquitin ligase for mediating c-Myc degradation. The FBW7 recognizes phosphorylated c-Myc at Thr-58, which is mediated by glycogen synthase kinase 3 (Gsk3) (15, 16). Another RING finger E3 ligase, Skp2, recognizes a conserved sequence element in the amino terminus of c-Myc (MBII) as well as the HLH-LZ motifs (amino acids 367–439). It promotes its polyubiquitination and degradation, resulting in the enhancement of c-Myc transcriptional activity (17, 18). The third RING finger E3 ligase, β-TrCP, binds to the amino terminus of c-Myc and uses the UbcH5 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) to form heterotypic polyubiquitin chains on c-Myc. This enhances c-Myc stability (19).
Importantly, the expression pattern of FBXO32 is inversely correlated with c-Myc expression during starvation treatment (2). Serum stimulation induces expression of c-Myc immediately (20, 21), but removal of growth factors at any point in the cell cycle results in down-regulation of the c-Myc (22, 23). In contrast, IGF-1 inhibits the transcription of FBXO32 through the PI3K/Akt/FOXO pathway and blocks dexamethasone-induced atrophy (24); food deprivation increases FBXO32 expression and results in rapid muscle wasting (2). Moreover, activation of FOXO3a leads to a considerable reduction in c-Myc (25, 26).
Given that FBXO32 is a direct target of FOXO3a (27), we sought to determine whether FBXO32 participates in the degradation of c-Myc. In this study, we identify c-Myc as a substrate of FBXO32 E3 ubiquitin ligase. FBXO32 targets c-Myc for ubiquitination and degradation through the proteasome pathway. Mutation of the lysine 326 in c-Myc reduces c-Myc ubiquitination and prevents c-Myc degradation induced by FBXO32. Moreover, overexpression of FBXO32 suppresses c-Myc activity and inhibits cell growth. In addition, we reveal that FBXO32 is a direct downstream target of c-Myc.
Experimental Procedures
Cell Culture and Transfection
HEK293T, HCT116, A673, and SKOV3 cells were originally obtained from ATCC. HEK293T, HCT116, and A673 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; HyClone) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone) in 5% CO2 at 37 °C, whereas SKOV3 cells were maintained in McCoy's 5A medium. VigoFect (Vigorous Biotech, Beijing) was used for cell transfection following the protocol provided by the manufacturer.
Plasmid Constructs
The original wild-type c-Myc and its domain constructs were kindly provided by Stephen Hann. HA-tagged c-Myc(P57S) and c-Myc(T58A) were kindly provided by Scott Lowe. The original Gadd45α promoter luciferase reporter was provided by Linda Penn. The pGL3-E2F2 promoter luciferase reporter was constructed by PCR amplification (28). pGL3-E2F2-mut promoter luciferase reporter was constructed by mutating three E-boxes in the promoter (the sequence information will be provided upon requested). The FBXO32 coding sequence was amplified from cDNA derived from 293T cell total RNA by PCR with the primers 5′-CCCGAATTCGGATGCCATTCCTCGGGCAGGAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCCGGTACCTCAGAACTTGAACAAGTTGATAAAG-3′ (reverse) and then subcloned into pCMV-HA vector (Clontech). Phage-CMV-MCS-IZsGreen was used as a retroviral expression vector. FBXO32-WT, FBXO32-ΔF-box, c-Myc-WT, and c-Myc-K326R were subcloned into phage-CMV-MCS-IZsGreen and confirmed by sequencing.
The FBXO32 promoter (positions −452 to +24) for its luciferase reporter construct was amplified from total DNA extracted from 293T cells by PCR with the primers 5′-CCCCTCGAGGGCTGATCTGGCTGCGGAGGTCG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCCAAGCTTAGCGTTGCAGGCTCCGGGAGTGC-3′ (reverse). The promoter was then subcloned into pGL4.10 vector (Promega).
For RNA interference experiments, pSuper and lentivirus vector LentiLox3.7 were used to make short hairpin RNA (shRNA) constructs. The target sequence for both pSuper-FBXO32-shRNA-1 and pll3.7-FBXO32-shRNA-1 was 5′-GTCACATCCTTTCCTGGAA-3′. The target sequence for both pSuper-FBXO32-shRNA-2 and pll3.7-FBXO32-shRNA-2 was 5′-GGAAGAAGATGTATTTCAA-3′. pSuper-c-Myc-shRNA-1 and pSuper-c-Myc-shRNA-2 were constructed using the following targeting sequences: 5′- CTATGACCTCGACTACGAC-3′ (pSuper-c-Myc-shRNA-1) and 5′-GACGAGAACAGTTGAAACA-3′ (pSuper-c-Myc-shRNA-2), respectively. The target sequence for pll3.7-c-Myc-shRNA was 5′-GCCATAATGTAAACTGCCT-3′, which targets 5′-UTR of human c-Myc.
For rescue experiments, the cDNA sequence of FBXO32 corresponding to the target sequence of FBXO32-shRNA-2, 5′-GGAAGAAGATGTATTTCAA-3′ (the mutated sites are underlined), was mutated to 5′-GGAAAAAAATGTACTTTAA-3′ (the mutated sites are underlined).
Antibodies and Reagents
The antibodies used were as follows: anti-FBXO32 antibody (7721-1, Epitomics; PAB15627, Abnovo), anti-c-Myc antibody (9E10, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.; A0309, ABclonal; D84C12, Cell Signaling), anti-E2F2 antibody (6848-1, Epitomics), anti-FLAG antibody (F1804, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-HA antibody (Covance), anti-GAPDH antibody (SC-47724, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-tubulin antibody (EPR1333, Epitomics), and anti-GFP antibody (AG281-1, Beyotime). The reagents used were as follows: MG132 (Calbiochem) and cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich).
Semiquantitative Real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and cDNA was synthesized using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas) following the manufacturer's instructions. Human FBXO32, E2F2, and Gadd45α cDNA were amplified with the following primer sequence: FBXO32, 5′-AAGTCTGTGCTGGTCGGGAA-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGTGAAGGTGAGGCCTTTGAAG-3′ (reverse); E2F2, 5′-GGCCAAGAACAACATCCAGT-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGTCCTCAGTCAGGTGCTTG-3′ (reverse); Gadd45α, 5′-ATGACTTTGGAGGAATTCTCG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CATTGATCCATGTAGCGACTT-3′ (reverse). 18S rRNA was used as an internal control. The primers for 18S rRNA were 5′-TCAACTTCGATGGTAGTCGCCGT-3′, and 5′-TCCTTGGATGTGGTAGCCGTTCT-3′.
Luciferase Reporter Assays
HEK293T or HCT116 cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected with the indicated plasmids by VigoFect (Vigorous Biotech, Beijing). The pRL-SV40 luciferase reporter (Promega) was included in all transfections for normalization. Luciferase activities were measured 24 h after transfection using the Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). Data were normalized to Renilla luciferase. Data are reported as the means ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 5 (unpaired Student's t test) (GraphPad Software Inc.).
Colony Formation Assays
The stable transfected SKOV3 cells via lentivirus infection were seeded in 6-well plates at 4 × 103 cells/well and cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 14 days. The colonies were fixed and stained with 0.4% crystal violet in 50% methanol for 30 min. Dishes were rinsed with water and left for drying at room temperature. Colonies were photographed with a stereomicroscope and counted by ImageJ software. Only the colonies containing more than 50 cells were set for counting. Data are reported as the means ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 5 (unpaired Student's t test) (GraphPad Software Inc.).
ChIP Assays
ChIP assays were performed in HCT116 cells following the protocol described previously (29). The primers for amplifying FBXO32 promoter were 5′-AGCACCGCTTCAAGTTTCCACCG-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGCAGTAGCTGCCGCAGTATTTATCCC-3′ (reverse); the primers for amplifying β-actin promoter were 5′-CAGGGCGTGATGGTGGGCA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CAAACATGATCTGGGTCATCTTCTC-3′ (reverse).
In Vivo Ubiquitination Assays
HEK293T cells were co-transfected with the indicated plasmids using Vigofect. After transfection for 24 h, the cells were collected, lysed, and subjected to immunoprecipitation by Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid beads (Novagen) and then examined by Western blotting using anti-HA antibody. The ubiquitin mutants have been described previously (30).
Lentivirus Package
Lentiviruses for gene overexpression were generated by transfecting HEK293T cells with combinations of transducing vector and two packaging vectors, PSPAX2 and pMD2.G. For lentiviral shRNA production, transducing vector was co-transfected with three packaging vectors, PMDLg/pRRE, VSVG, and RSV-Rev, in HEK293T cells. After transfection for 6 h, the medium was replaced with fresh DMEM with 10% FBS. 48 h later, the medium containing the lentivirus particles was harvested, filtered, and transduced into target cells or frozen at −70 °C for subsequent using. Polybrene (8 μg/ml) was added to the medium for improving infection efficiency.
Co-immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis
For Western blot analysis and co-immunoprecipitation, the experimental procedures have been described previously (31). Anti-HA antibody and anti-FLAG antibody-conjugated agarose beads were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Protein A/G-Sepharose beads were purchased from GE Healthcare. Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Bind resin was purchased from Novogen. For endogenous immunoprecipitation, the mouse leg muscle was used for extracting protein. The Fuji Film LAS4000 miniluminescent image analyzer system was used to photograph the blots. Multi Gauge version 3.0 was used for quantifying the protein levels based on the band density obtained in Western blot analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate; the statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.0 (unpaired Student's t tests).
Results
FBXO32 Promotes c-Myc Degradation
To study the relationship between FBXO32 and c-Myc, we first transfected HEK293T cells with an equal amount of HA-c-Myc and increasing amounts of HA-FBXO32. Ectopic expression of FBXO32 degraded c-Myc in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 1A). In contrast, knockdown of endogenous FBXO32 by transiently transfected pSuper-shRNA-1 or pSuper-shRNA-2 in HCT116 cells caused endogenous c-Myc to increase (first line from the top to the bottom in the left panel of Fig. 1B). Consistently, E2F2, a well defined downstream target of c-Myc, also increased (second line from the top to the bottom in the left panel of Fig. 1B). The efficiency of pSuper-FBXO32-shRNA-1- or pSuper-FBXO32-shRNA-2-mediated FBXO32 knockdown was confirmed (third line from the top to the bottom in the left panel of Fig. 1B). To verify the specificity of FBXO32-shRNA-2-mediated FBXO32 knockdown, we performed a rescue experiment. As shown in Fig. 1C, overexpression of FBXO32-shRNA-2-resistant FBXO32 in HCT116 cells neutralized the effect of FBXO32-shRNA-2-mediated c-Myc up-regulation. To determine whether FBXO32-mediated c-Myc reduction was due to FBXO32-induced c-Myc instability, we added the new protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide (CHX)2 and examined the protein levels at different time points. Without ectopically expressed FBXO32, the overexpressed c-Myc gradually degraded (left panel in Fig. 1D). However, co-expression of wild-type FBXO32 caused c-Myc to degrade more rapidly (middle panel in Fig. 1D). In contrast, co-expression of the F-box domain-deleted mutant of FBXO32 obviously prolonged the half-life of c-Myc (right panel in Fig. 1D). It appears that the mutant, FBXO32-ΔF-box, exhibits the dominant negative form activity in mediating c-Myc degradation. The protein levels of c-Myc were further quantified (Fig. 1D). To further evaluate the data, we knocked down endogenous FBXO32 by transiently transfected pSuper-FBXO32-shRNA-1 and pSuper-FBXO32-shRNA-1 in HCT116 cells and examined the protein level at different time points in the presence of CHX (50 μg/ml). Versus the control, which was transiently transfected with pSuper-GFP-shRNA (left panel in Fig. 1E), knockdown of FBXO32 prolonged the half-life of endogenous c-Myc (middle and right panels in Fig. 1E). This is in contrast to what was seen in overexpression of FBXO32 (Fig. 1E). The c-Myc levels were then further quantified (Fig. 1E).
It is of note that anti-c-Myc antibodies from different companies could detect different expression patterns of endogenous c-Myc. The anti-c-Myc antibody from ABclonal could only detect one obvious band of endogenous c-Myc, but the antibody from Cell Signaling could detect two bands of endogenous c-Myc. Regardless of the number of bands, the tendency of c-Myc expression to be affected by knockdown of FBXO32 remained consistent (Fig. 1, B, C, and E). Taken together, these observations suggest that FBXO32 induces c-Myc degradation and that the F-box domain is required for FBXO32 to mediate c-Myc degradation.
Phosphorylation of c-Myc at Thr-58 and Ser-62 Is Dispensable for FBXO32-induced c-Myc Degradation
It has been reported that FBW7, an F-box E3 ligase, destabilizes c-Myc, but the FBW7 mutant lacking the F-box domain delayed it (15, 16), which is similar to what was observed for FBXO32. Of note, the turnover of c-Myc by FBW7 is largely dependent on the phosphorylation of Thr-58 and Ser-62 in MBI (15, 16). In addition, a common c-Myc mutant, P57S, in Burkitt lymphoma is able to abrogate Thr-58 phosphorylation (32). To determine whether FBXO32 also has functions similar to that of FBW7 on these mutants, we examined the effect of FBXO32 on the c-Myc mutants T58A, S62A, T58A/S62A, and P57S as well as the constitutive phosphorylation mutant S62E. As shown in Fig. 2, A and B, co-expression of HA-FBXO32 promotes degradation in all of these mutants. In addition to these three sites, four other sites (Ser-71, Tyr-74, Thr-358, and Ser-373) in c-Myc have also been reported to be phosphorylation sites (33–36). We found that HA-FBXO32 also promotes degradation in all four mutants (S71A, Y74A, T358A, and S373A) (Fig. 2C). These observations suggest that the turnover of c-Myc by FBXO32 is neither dependent on phosphorylation of Thr-58 and Ser-62 in MB1 nor dependent on phosphorylation of other sites, which is in contrast to FBW7 (15, 16).
FBXO32 Interacts with c-Myc
To determine the mechanisms of FBXO32-mediated c-Myc degradation, we examined whether FBXO32 could interact with c-Myc. As shown in Fig. 3C, ectopically expressed HA-c-Myc could pull down ectopically expressed FLAG-FBXO32 in HEK293T cells by immunoprecipitation assays using anti-HA-conjugated agarose beads (Fig. 3A). This interaction was endogenous and direct because a polyclonal anti-c-Myc antibody (A0309, ABclonal) pulled down endogenous FBXO32 in mouse muscle lysates (Fig. 3B), and GST-FBXO32 expressed in Escherichia coli pulled down His-c-Myc in E. coli (Fig. 3C). In addition, the c-Myc mutants T58A, S62A, and T58A/S62A could interact with FBXO32 when they were overexpressed in HEK293T cells (Fig. 3D).
We performed domain mapping to further study the mechanism of FBXO32-mediated c-Myc degradation. Whereas FLAG-tagged FBXO32 could be effectively pulled down by the truncated c-Myc mutants, 1–144 and 1–367 (Fig. 3, E and F), the other two truncated c-Myc mutants (168–367 and 168–439) only weakly pulled down FLAG-tagged FBXO32 (Fig. 3, E and F). The c-Myc truncated mutant (mutant 1–144) contains two conserved domains, MBI and MBII (Fig. 3E) (37). As reported, MBI is required for FBW7 interactions (15), whereas MBII is required for Skp2 interactions (18). To determine whether MBI or MBII is required for FBXO32 interaction, we performed fine domain mapping. Deletion of MBI or MBII did not impact the interaction between FBXO32 and the c-Myc mutant (mutant 1–144; Fig. 3G). We also examined whether the interaction between FBXO32 and the c-Myc mutant (mutant 168–367) requires the domain MBIII or MBIV or the PEST domains. Although the interaction between FBXO32 and the c-Myc mutant (mutant 168–367) was relatively weak, deletion of MBIII did not obviously impact the interaction between FBXO32 and the c-Myc mutant (mutant 168–367). Deletion of MBIV and PEST abrogated the interaction between FBXO32 and the c-Myc mutant (mutant 168–367), which suggests that the FBXO32 interacts with domain 168–367 of c-Myc and requires the MBIV and PEST.
We next sought to determine the FBXO32 domains required for c-Myc interaction. It appeared that all of the domains in the FBXO32 could pull down c-Myc, whereas the amino terminus (residues 1–223) or the carboxyl terminus alone interacted with c-Myc much more strongly. Of note, the truncated mutant of FBXO32 lacking the F-box domain (1–355(ΔF-box)) still interacted with c-Myc. To further determine whether the F-box domain is required for c-Myc interactions, we fused GFP to 218–355 and 271–355, respectively, and performed immunoprecipitation assays. As shown in Fig. 3J, c-Myc could interact with the domain 272–355 of FBXO32 as well as the domain 218–355 of FBXO32. This suggests that the F-box is definitely not required for FBXO32 to interact with c-Myc. In sum, the data suggest that FBXO32 interacts with c-Myc endogenously and directly.
FBXO32 Catalyzes c-Myc to Form Lys-48-linked Polyubiquitin Chain and Induces c-Myc for Proteasomal Degradation
To determine whether FBXO32 acts as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to induce c-Myc proteasomal degradation, we examined whether the potent proteasomal inhibitor, MG132, could block FBXO32-induced c-Myc degradation. We transfected HA-c-Myc into HEK293T cells as well as an HA empty vector control or HA-FBXO32. We then treated the cells with MG132 or DMSO (control) for 6 h before the harvest. The addition of MG132 effectively blocked FBXO32-induced c-Myc degradation (Fig. 4A), which indicates that FBXO32 mediates c-Myc proteasomal degradation.
We performed ubiquitination assays to confirm that FBXO32 can indeed catalyze c-Myc to form polyubiquitin chains (Fig. 4B). However, polyubiquitination of c-Myc reduced dramatically when the wild-type FBXO32 was replaced by the FBXO32 mutant that lacked the F-box domain. This suggested that FBXO32 requires the F-box domain to perform its E3 ubiquitin ligase role.
Ubiquitin contains seven lysine residues (Lys-6, -11, -27, -29, -33, -48, and -63) that can participate in either polyubiquitination or monoubiquitination to generate polyubiquitin or monoubiquitin involved in various biological functions (39). Lys-48-linked polyubiquitination is thought to target substrates for proteasomal degradation, whereas Lys-63-linked polyubiquitination has been implicated in multiple functions (40). We performed further assays to determine whether FBXO32 catalyzes c-Myc to form Lys-48-linked polyubiquitination. When the Lys-48 of ubiquitin was mutated to arginine, polyubiquitination of c-Myc by FBXO32 was reduced dramatically versus wild-type ubiquitin (Fig. 4C). However, when the Lys-63 of ubiquitin was mutated to arginine, polyubiquitination of c-Myc by FBXO32 was similar to that of wild-type ubiquitin (Fig. 4C). We next used seven Lys-only mutants of ubiquitin (Lys-6, -11, -27, -29, -33, -48, and -63) to perform polyubiquitination assays. These mutants only keep one lysine, and all of the other lysines are mutated to arginine (30). FBXO32 catalyzed c-Myc polyubiquitination in the presence of wild type (WT), Lys-48-only mutant, and Lys-11-only mutant but not other Lys-only mutants (Fig. 4D). These phenomena indicate that FBXO32 could indeed catalyze c-Myc to form Lys-48-linked polyubiquitin chains, which is consistent with its role in mediating c-Myc for proteasomal degradation.
FBXO32 Targets c-Myc Ubiquitination at Lys-326
To identify the lysine residue(s) in c-Myc catalyzed by FBXO32, we systematically mutated them to arginine. The protein degradation efficiency by FBXO32 was used to monitor the potential ubiquitination site(s) in c-Myc. Fig. 5A illustrates that overexpression of FBXO32 did not promote degradation of one mutant (K326R). Although the mutant (K326R) showed the most dramatic increase of resistance to FBXO32-mediated degradation, it looks like additional sites (K51R/K52R, K126R, K157R, K289R, K371R, K389R, and K412R) also exhibited some resistance. To further confirm that Lys-326 is the key site catalyzed by FBXO32, we made additional mutants K51R, K52R, K51R/K52R/K126R/K157R/K289R/K371R/K389R/K412R (K8R), and K326R+K8R and repeated the experiments. The mutants K51R, K52R, and K8R could still be degraded by FBXO32, although K8R exhibited some resistance (Fig. 5, B and C). When Lys-326 was mutated in K8R (K326R+K8R), the mutant showed complete resistance (Fig. 5C). The quantitative data are summed in Fig. 5D. Versus the wild-type c-Myc, polyubiquitination of the c-Myc(K326R) mutant by the wild-type FBXO32 was clearly decreased, but it did not completely disappear (Fig. 5E). It appears that this reduction was not a result of the reduction of interaction between FBXO32 and c-Myc(K326R) because c-Myc(K326R) could still interact with c-Myc as well as the wild-type c-Myc (Fig. 5F). Interestingly, versus the wild-type c-Myc, polyubiquitination of the c-Myc K8R mutant by the FBXO32 was also decreased, and polyubiquitination of the c-Myc K326R+K8R mutant induced by FBXO32 completely disappeared.
FBXO32 Suppresses c-Myc Activity
To evaluate the biological consequences of FBXO32-mediated c-Myc degradation, we examined the effect of FBXO32 on the transactivation of two well defined c-Myc target genes, Gadd45α (42)and E2F2 (43). As expected, ectopic expression of c-Myc inhibited the Gadd45α promoter activity ∼0.23-fold (p = 0.0050) (Fig. 6A) in HEK293T cells. However, co-expression of FBXO32 together with c-Myc restored the suppressive role of c-Myc in Gadd45α promoter activity (p = 0.0044) (Fig. 6A). The c-Myc activated the E2F2 promoter activity ∼2.55-fold. Co-expression of FBXO32 together with c-Myc abrogated the E2F2 promoter activity induced by c-Myc (p = 0.0190). In contrast, c-Myc had no activating role in the mutated E2F2 promoter activity (p = 0.1107) (Fig. 6C). Co-expression of FBXO32 also could not exhibit its suppressive role in the mutated E2F2 promoter activity (Fig. 6C). The expressions of ectopically expressed HA-c-Myc and HA-FBXO32 in HEK293T cells were confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 6D).
To further evaluate the role of FBXO32 in c-Myc activity, we established stable A673 cell lines (a rhabomyosarcoma cell line) with overexpression of FBXO32 or knockdown of FBXO32 by transduced A673 cells using lentiviral infection. The endogenous FBXO32 protein levels in mouse muscle, A673 cells, and HCT116 cells were examined by Western blot assay (data not shown). Overexpression of FBXO32 reduced the E2F2 mRNA level but caused an increase in the Gadd45α mRNA level, as revealed by semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 6, E and F). In contrast, knockdown of FBXO32 by either FBXO32-shRNA-1 or FBXO32-shRNA-2 caused an increase in the E2F2 mRNA level, but this reduced the Gadd45α mRNA level, as revealed by semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 6, G and H). These observations are consistent with the data obtained from the promoter assays.
To determine whether FBXO32-mediated regulation of Gadd45α and E2F2 is dependent on c-Myc, we generated three stable HCT116 cell lines with lentiviral infection. The first cell line expressed c-Myc-shRNA, which targets the 5′-UTR region of c-Myc. The second and third cell lines were established by reinfecting the first cell line with lentiviruses expressing the wild-type c-Myc and c-Myc(K326R) mutant, respectively. In cells with c-Myc-knocked down, overexpression of FBXO32 had no obvious effect on Gadd45α and E2F2 promoter activity (Fig. 6, I and M). In contrast, the effects of FBXO32 on Gadd45α promoter activity and the inhibition of FBXO32 on E2F2 promoter activity were recovered with c-Myc restoration (Fig. 6, J and N). However, in the third cell line with c-Myc(K326R) mutant expression, the activation of FBXO32 on Gadd45α promoter activity and the inhibition of FBXO32 on the E2F2 promoter activity were not recovered (Fig. 6, K and O). The expressions of wild-type c-Myc, c-Myc(K326R), and HA-FBXO32 were confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 6L). Whenever c-Myc was knocked down by c-Myc-shRNA or wild-type c-Myc was restored in c-Myc-knocked down cells, overexpression of FBXO32 had no effect on the E-box-mutated E2F2 promoter activity (Fig. 6, P and Q). These observations suggest that FBXO32-mediated regulation of Gadd45α and E2F2 is dependent on c-Myc. Taken together, these data suggest that FBXO32 suppresses c-Myc activity.
FBXO32 Inhibits Ovary Cancer Cell SKOV3 Proliferation
To elucidate the biological function of FBXO32 in mediating c-Myc degradation, we examined its effect on cell proliferation using three stable SKOV3 cell lines generated by lentiviral infection, vector control, FBXO32, and FBXO32-ΔF-box. Versus the control cells, the SKOV3 cells with the FBXO32 overexpression proliferated much more slowly from day 2 (Fig. 7A). In contrast, the proliferation rate of the SKOV3 cells with stable FBXO32-ΔF-box mutant expression is similar to that of the control cells. Conversely, the SKOV3 cells with stable knocked down FBXO32 proliferated faster than the control cells expressing GFP shRNA (Fig. 7B).
Through the colony formation assays, we further found that the colony number formed in the SKOV3 cells with the FBXO32 overexpression was fewer than that of the control SKOV3 cells or that of the SKOV3 cells with the FBXO32-ΔF-box overexpression (Fig. 7D). Thus, FBXO32 can inhibit cell proliferation, which might be mediated by inducing c-Myc degradation.
FBXO32 Is a Direct Target Gene of c-Myc
As a transcription factor, c-Myc can form heterodimers with MAX that bind to E-boxes in the regulatory regions of the target genes and regulate a broad spectrum of genes involved in multiple physiological and pathological processes (44). After we performed bioinformatic analysis on the promoter region of FBXO32, we realized a potential E-box localized at the positions −107 to −102 (the translation initial site is designated as +1). Therefore, we sought to determine whether FBXO32 is a direct target of c-Myc. We first amplified the FBXO32 promoter spanning −425 to +24 and −204 to −5 by PCR and cloned this into the pGL4.10 vector (Promega). The promoter assays showed that ectopic expression of c-Myc caused a significant increase in FBXO32 promoter activity (Fig. 8A). The expression of HA-c-Myc was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 8B). However, when the core sequence of the E-box (CACGTG) in the −204 to −5 region of the FBXO32 promoter was mutated (CAGCTG), ectopic expression of c-Myc had no obvious effect on the activation of the mutated FBXO32 promoter activity versus that of wild-type FBXO32 promoter activity (Fig. 8, C and D). Moreover, overexpression of c-Myc in HEK293T cells and HCT116 cells caused an increase in FBXO32 mRNA level (Fig. 8, E and F). Consistently, knockdown of c-Myc in HCT116 cells by c-Myc-shRNA-1 and c-Myc-shRNA-2 reduced the FBXO32 mRNA level. The induction of FBXO32 by c-Myc was further confirmed by Western blot analysis in the status with either overexpression of c-Myc or knockdown of c-Myc (Fig. 8, H and I).
To determine whether c-Myc can directly bind to the promoter of FBXO32, we performed ChIP analysis. Fig. 8, J and K, illustrates that the anti-c-Myc antibody could pull down a 200-bp fragment containing the E-box that is located in the −204 to −5 region of the FBXO32 promoter versus the rabbit IgG control. Semiquantitative RT-PCR further confirmed co-precipitation of the anti-c-Myc with the promoter of FBXO32 (Fig. 8L).
Considered collectively, these data suggest that c-Myc could up-regulate FBXO32 expression by directly binding to the FBXO32 promoter. Thus, FBXO32 might be a direct target of c-Myc.
Discussion
FBXO32 Targets c-Myc for Proteasomal Degradation
FBXO32 was identified as a muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase more than 10 years ago. Increasing evidence indicates that FBXO32 plays important roles in skeletal muscle atrophy as well as in tumorigenesis. In this study, we identified c-Myc as a novel target of FBXO32 for proteasomal degradation. First, we showed that FBXO32 promoted c-Myc degradation efficiently, which was effectively blocked by MG132. This suggested that FBXO32 serves as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to mediate c-Myc proteasomal degradation. Similar to the eIF3-f and MyoD degradation targets, the F-box domain is required for FBXO32 to induce c-Myc ubiquitination and degradation, resembling the F-box-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase (6, 7, 45).
Through mutant screening, we identified that Lys-326 of c-Myc might be the key position needed for FBXO32 to catalyze the formation of Lys-48-linked polyubiquitin chain because FBXO32 could not induce c-Myc(K326R) mutant degradation. Although the capability of the polyubiquitin chain formation catalyzed by wild-type FBXO32 was clearly reduced, the FBXO32 still could stimulate formation of polyubiquitin chains on c-Myc(K326R) mutants. This phenomenon suggests that FBXO32 might also catalyze formation of other kinds of polyubiquitin chains (except Lys-48 polyubiquitin chains) or catalyze other lysine sites (except Lys-326) to form polyubiquitin chains. Interestingly, we noticed that the c-Myc mutant K326R+K8R completely lost the ability to form a polyubiquitin chain, and FBXO32 could also catalyze c-Myc to form Lys-11-only polyubiquitin chains. This may support the hypothesis.
The effect of FBXO32 on c-Myc is quite similar to that of FBW7, which is another well defined F-box E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets c-Myc for proteasomal degradation and inhibits c-Myc activity. However, phosphorylation of Thr-58 and Ser-62 is required for c-Myc degradation mediated by FBW7. In contrast, phosphorylation of Thr-58 and Ser-62 is not required for c-Myc degradation mediated by FBXO32, which suggests that FBXO32 mediates c-Myc degradation through a mechanism different from that of FBW7.
FBXO32 May Perform Its Tumor-suppressive Function through Targeting c-Myc
To date, the role of FBXO32 in tumorigenesis remains debatable. Whereas FBXO32 is considered a hallmark of cancer cachexia (13, 46), FBXO32 is also found to be down-regulated in some types of cancer through different mechanisms (9, 47), suggesting its tumor-suppressive function. In this study, we showed that FBXO32 could effectively induce degradation of c-Myc, a classic oncogene overactivated in many types of cancer (48). Moreover, we found that overexpression of FBXO32 suppresses growth of ovary cancer SKOV3 cells but that knockdown of FBXO32 enhances growth of SKOV3 cells. These findings reinforce the tumor-suppressive function of FBXO32. As a muscle-specific gene, further exploring the role of FBXO32 in the initiation and progression of some special types of cancer that developed from muscle tissues (i.e. rhabdomyosarcoma) will shed light on the role of FBXO32 in tumorigenesis.
Negative Feedback Regulation of c-Myc by FBXO32
In this study, we also identified FBXO32 as a direct downstream target of c-Myc, revealing a negative feedback regulation loop between c-Myc and FBXO32. c-Myc transcriptionally regulates FBXO32 expression, but FBXO32 promotes c-Myc degradation. Actually, another E3 ubiquitin ligase of c-Myc (17, 18), Skp2, is also up-regulated by c-Myc, although it serves as a co-factor instead of a suppressor for c-Myc-regulated transcription (41). Notably, this type of regulation has been widely recognized, including the p53/MDM2 (38) pathway, which implicates a strict regulation mechanism between the two genes. Further understanding of this regulation loop will open a new window for understanding the mechanisms of these two genes in tumorigenesis.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Drs. Stephen Hann, Scott Lowe, and Linda Penn for the generous gifts of reagents.
This work was supported by CAS Major Scientific and Technological Project XDA08010208; NSFC Grants 31461163003, 31071212, and 91019008 (to W. X.); and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province Grant 2012C37080 (to X. S.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
- CHX
- cycloheximide
- K8R
- K51R/K52R/K126R/K157R/K289R/K371R/K389R/K412R multiple mutant.
References
- 1. Bodine S. C., Latres E., Baumhueter S., Lai V. K. M., Nunez L., Clarke B. A., Poueymirou W. T., Panaro F. J., Na E. Q., Dharmarajan K., Pan Z. Q., Valenzuela D. M., DeChiara T. M., Stitt T. N., Yancopoulos G. D., Glass D. J. (2001) Identification of ubiquitin ligases required for skeletal muscle atrophy. Science 294, 1704–1708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gomes M. D., Lecker S. H., Jagoe R. T., Navon A., Goldberg A. L. (2001) Atrogin-1, a muscle-specific F-box protein highly expressed during muscle atrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 14440–14445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ponting C. P., Phillips C., Davies K. E., Blake D. J. (1997) PDZ domains: targeting signalling molecules to sub-membranous sites. Bioessays 19, 469–479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Harrison S. C. (1996) Peptide-surface association: the case of PDZ and PTB domains. Cell 86, 341–343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Julie L. C., Sabrina B. P., Marie-Pierre L., Leibovitch S. A. (2012) Identification of essential sequences for cellular localization in the muscle-specific ubiquitin E3 ligase MAFbx/Atrogin 1. FEBS Lett. 586, 362–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lagirand-Cantaloube J., Offner N., Csibi A., Leibovitch M. P., Batonnet-Pichon S., Tintignac L. A., Segura C. T., Leibovitch S. A. (2008) The initiation factor eIF3-f is a major target for Atrogin1/MAFbx function in skeletal muscle atrophy. EMBO J. 27, 1266–1276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Tintignac L. A., Lagirand J., Batonnet S., Sirri V., Leibovitch M. P., Leibovitch S. A. (2005) Degradation of MyoD mediated by the SCF (MAFbx) ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 2847–2856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Xie P., Guo S., Fan Y., Zhang H., Gu D., Li H. (2009) Atrogin-1/MAFbx enhances simulated ischemia/reperfusion-induced apoptosis in cardiomyocytes through degradation of MAPK phosphatase-1 and sustained JNK activation. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 5488–5496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chou J. L., Su H. Y., Chen L. Y., Liao Y. P., Hartman-Frey C., Lai Y. H., Yang H. W., Deatherage D. E., Kuo C. T., Huang Y. W., Yan P. S., Hsiao S. H., Tai C. K., Lin H. J. L., Davuluri R. V., Chao T. K., Nephew K. P., Huang T. H. M., Lai H. C., Chan M. W. Y. (2010) Promoter hypermethylation of FBXO32, a novel TGF-β/SMAD4 target gene and tumor suppressor, is associated with poor prognosis in human ovarian cancer. Lab. Invest. 90, 414–425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Guo W., Zhang M., Shen S., Guo Y., Kuang G., Yang Z., Dong Z. (2014) Aberrant methylation and decreased expression of the TGF-β/Smad target gene FBXO32 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 120, 2412–2423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ciarapica R., De Salvo M., Carcarino E., Bracaglia G., Adesso L., Leoncini P. P., Dall'Agnese A., Walters Z. S., Verginelli F., De Sio L., Boldrini R., Inserra A., Bisogno G., Rosolen A., Alaggio R., Ferrari A., Collini P., Locatelli M., Stifani S., Screpanti I., Rutella S., Yu Q., Marquez V. E., Shipley J., Valente S., Mai A., Miele L., Puri P. L., Locatelli F., Palacios D., Rota R. (2014) The Polycomb group (PcG) protein EZH2 supports the survival of PAX3-FOXO1 alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma by repressing FBXO32 (Atrogin1/MAFbx). Oncogene 33, 4173–4184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Reed S. A., Sandesara P. B., Senf S. M., Judge A. R. (2012) Inhibition of FoxO transcriptional activity prevents muscle fiber atrophy during cachexia and induces hypertrophy. FASEB J. 26, 987–1000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhang G., Jin B., Li Y. P. (2011) C/EBPβ mediates tumour-induced ubiquitin ligase atrogin1/MAFbx upregulation and muscle wasting. EMBO J. 30, 4323–4335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Farrell A. S., Sears R. C. (2014) MYC degradation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 10.1101/cshperspect.a014365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Yada M., Hatakeyama S., Kamura T., Nishiyama M., Tsunematsu R., Imaki H., Ishida N., Okumura F., Nakayama K., Nakayama K. I. (2004) Phosphorylation-dependent degradation of c-Myc is mediated by the F-box protein Fbw7. EMBO J. 23, 2116–2125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Welcker M., Orian A., Jin J., Grim J. E., Harper J. W., Eisenman R. N., Clurman B. E. (2004) The Fbw7 tumor suppressor regulates glycogen synthase kinase 3 phosphorylation-dependent c-Myc protein degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 9085–9090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kim S. Y., Herbst A., Tworkowski K. A., Salghetti S. E., Tansey W. P. (2003) Skp2 regulates Myc protein stability and activity. Mol. Cell 11, 1177–1188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. von der Lehr N., Johansson S., Wu S., Bahram F., Castell A., Cetinkaya C., Hydbring P., Weidung I., Nakayama K., Nakayama K. I., Söderberg O., Kerppola T. K., Larsson L. G. (2003) The F-box protein Skp2 participates in c-Myc proteosomal degradation and acts as a cofactor for c-Myc-regulated transcription. Mol. Cell 11, 1189–1200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Popov N., Schülein C., Jaenicke L. A., Eilers M. (2010) Ubiquitylation of the amino terminus of Myc by SCF(β-TrCP) antagonizes SCF(Fbw7)-mediated turnover. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 973–981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Persson H., Gray H. E., Godeau F., Braunhut S., Bellvé A. R. (1986) Multiple growth-associated nuclear proteins immunoprecipitated by antisera raised against human c-Myc peptide antigens. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 942–949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Rabbitts P. H., Watson J. V., Lamond A., Forster A., Stinson M. A., Evan G., Fischer W., Atherton E., Sheppard R., Rabbitts T. H. (1985) Metabolism of c-myc gene products: c-myc messenger RNA and protein expression in the cell cycle. EMBO J. 4, 2009–2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Dean M., Levine R. A., Ran W., Kindy M. S., Sonenshein G. E., Campisi J. (1986) Regulation of c-myc transcription and messenger RNA abundance by serum growth factors and cell contact. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 9161–9166 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Waters C. M., Littlewood T. D., Hancock D. C., Moore J. P., Evan G. I. (1991) c-Myc protein expression in untransformed fibroblasts. Oncogene 6, 797–805 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Stitt T. N., Drujan D., Clarke B. A., Panaro F., Timofeyva Y., Kline W. O., Gonzalez M., Yancopoulos G. D., Glass D. J. (2004) The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt pathway prevents short article expression of muscle atrophy-induced ubiquitin ligases by inhibiting FOXO transcription factors. Mol. Cell 14, 395–403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ferber E. C., Peck B., Delpuech O., Bell G. P., East P., Schulze A. (2012) FOXO3a regulates reactive oxygen metabolism by inhibiting mitochondrial gene expression. Cell Death Differ. 19, 968–979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Delpuech O., Griffiths B., East P., Essafi A., Lam E. W. F., Burgering B., Downward J., Schulze A. (2007) Induction of Mxi1-SR α by FOXO3a contributes to repression of Myc-dependent gene expression. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 4917–4930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sandri M., Sandri C., Gilbert A., Skurk C., Calabria E., Picard A., Walsh K., Schiaffino S., Lecker S. H., Goldberg A. L. (2004) Foxo transcription factors induce the atrophy-related ubiquitin ligase atrogin-1 and cause skeletal muscle atrophy. Cell 117, 399–412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sears R., Ohtani K., Nevins J. R. (1997) Identification of positively and negatively acting elements regulating expression of the E2F2 gene in response to cell growth signals. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 5227–5235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Feng X., Liu X., Zhang W., Xiao W. (2011) p53 directly suppresses BNIP3 expression to protect against hypoxia-induced cell death. EMBO J. 30, 3397–3415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Wang J., Zhang W., Ji W., Liu X., Ouyang G., Xiao W. (2014) The von Hippel-Lindau protein suppresses androgen receptor activity. Mol. Endocrinol. 28, 239–248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chen Z., Liu X., Mei Z., Wang Z., Xiao W. (2014) EAF2 suppresses hypoxia-induced factor 1α transcriptional activity by disrupting its interaction with coactivator CBP/p300. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 1085–1099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hoang A. T., Lutterbach B., Lewis B. C., Yano T., Chou T. Y., Barrett J. F., Raffeld M., Hann S. R., Dang C. V. (1995) A link between increased transforming activity of lymphoma-derived Myc mutant alleles, their defective regulation by P107, and altered phosphorylation of the c-Myc transactivation domain. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 4031–4042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Noguchi K., Kitanaka C., Yamana H., Kokubu A., Mochizuki T., Kuchino Y. (1999) Regulation of c-Myc through phosphorylation at Ser-62 and Ser-71 by c-Jun N-terminal kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32580–32587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sanchez-Arévalo Lobo V. J., Doni M., Verrecchia A., Sanulli S., Fagà G., Piontini A., Bianchi M., Conacci-Sorrell M., Mazzarol G., Peg V., Losa J. H., Ronchi P., Ponzoni M., Eisenman R. N., Doglioni C., Amati B. (2013) Dual regulation of Myc by Abl. Oncogene 32, 5261–5271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bartholomeusz G., Talpaz M., Bornmann W., Kong L. Y., Donato N. J. (2007) Degrasyn activates proteasomal-dependent degradation of c-Myc. Cancer Res. 67, 3912–3918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Huang Z., Traugh J. A., Bishop J. M. (2004) Negative control of the Myc protein by the stress-responsive kinase Pak2. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 1582–1594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Meyer N., Penn L. Z. (2008) Reflecting on 25 years with MYC. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 976–990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Lahav G., Rosenfeld N., Sigal A., Geva-Zatorsky N., Levine A. J., Elowitz M. B., Alon U. (2004) Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells. Nat. Genet. 36, 147–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ikeda F., Dikic I. (2008) Atypical ubiquitin chains: new molecular signals: “Protein modifications: Beyond the usual suspects” review series. EMBO Rep. 9, 536–542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kulathu Y., Komander D. (2012) Atypical ubiquitylation: the unexplored world of polyubiquitin beyond Lys48 and Lys63 linkages. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 508–523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bretones G., Acosta J. C., Caraballo J. M., Ferrándiz N., Gómez-Casares M. T., Albajar M., Blanco R., Ruiz P., Hung W. C., Albero M. P., Perez-Roger I., León J. (2011) SKP2 oncogene is a direct MYC target gene and MYC down-regulates p27(KIP1) through SKP2 in human leukemia cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 9815–9825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Barsyte-Lovejoy D., Mao D. Y. L., Penn L. Z. (2004) c-Myc represses the proximal promoters of GADD45α and GADD153 by a post-RNA polymerase II recruitment mechanism. Oncogene 23, 3481–3486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Leone G., Sears R., Huang E., Rempel R., Nuckolls F., Park C. H., Giangrande P., Wu L., Saavedra H. I., Field S. J., Thompson M. A., Yang H., Fujiwara Y., Greenberg M. E., Orkin S., Smith C., Nevins J. R. (2001) Myc requires distinct E2F activities to induce S phase and apoptosis. Mol. Cell 8, 105–113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Amati B., Brooks M. W., Levy N., Littlewood T. D., Evan G. I., Land H. (1993) Oncogenic activity of the c-Myc protein requires dimerization with Max. Cell 72, 233–245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kipreos E. T., Pagano M. (2000) The F-box protein family. Genome Biol. 1, REVIEWS3002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Baltgalvis K. A., Berger F. G., Peña M. M. O., Davis J. M., White J. P., Carson J. A. (2009) Muscle wasting and interleukin-6-induced atrogin-I expression in the cachectic Apc (Min/+) mouse. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 457, 989–1001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Tan J., Yang X., Zhuang L., Jiang X., Chen W., Lee P. L., Karuturi R. K. M., Tan P. B. O., Liu E. T., Yu Q. (2007) Pharmacologic disruption of polycomb-repressive complex 2-mediated gene repression selectively induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Genes Dev. 21, 1050–1063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Tansey W. P. (2014) Mammalian MYC proteins and cancer. New J. Sci. 2014, 1–27 [Google Scholar]