Skip to main content
Journal of Physical Therapy Science logoLink to Journal of Physical Therapy Science
. 2015 May 26;27(5):1299–1302. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1299

Does restriction of glenohumeral horizontal adduction reflect posterior capsule thickening of the throwing shoulder?

Tomonobu Ishigaki 1,2, Tomoya Ishida 1,3, Mina Samukawa 4, Hiroshi Saito 4, Yuya Ezawa 2, Motoki Hirokawa 1, Takumi Kato 5, Makoto Sugawara 2, Harukazu Tohyama 4, Masanori Yamanaka 4,*
PMCID: PMC4483383  PMID: 26157205

Abstract

[Purpose] Glenohumeral posterior capsule tightness possibly relates to posterior capsule thickness (PCT). The purpose of the current study was to analyze the relationships between PCT and glenohumeral range of motion (ROM) in horizontal adduction (HAdd) and internal rotation (IR). [Subjects and Methods] This study recruited 39 healthy collegiate baseball players. We measured PCT by using ultrasonography and ROM of the glenohumeral joint of the throwing shoulder by using a digital inclinometer. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated between PCT and HAdd or IR ROM. [Results] There was no correlation between PCT and HAdd ROM, but PCT was significantly correlated with IR ROM. [Conclusion] This result indicates that posterior shoulder capsule tightness only relates to IR ROM, and that restricted HAdd ROM might reflect tightness of other tissue, such as the posterior deltoid.

Key words: Capsule thickness, Horizontal adduction, Internal rotation

INTRODUCTION

It is common for throwing athletes to demonstrate limited glenohumeral internal rotation (IR) (Fig. 1A) of their throwing shoulder compared with their non-throwing shoulder. This loss of IR range of motion (ROM) is termed GIRD which is an acronym for glenohumeral IR deficit1). There have been several studies to indicate a relationship between GIRD and throwing-related injury, including shoulder and/or elbow problems2,3,4,5,6). Furthermore, a previous prospective study demonstrated that professional baseball pitchers with GIRD may have a higher risk of shoulder injury5).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Measurement of the ROMs. (A) Glenohumeral internal rotation. (B) Glenohumeral horizontal adduction.

Burkhurt et al. described the possibility that contracture of the posterior capsule can be led by response to distractive loads during the follow-through phase of throwing motion1). Furthermore, previous cadaveric studies demonstrated that simulated posterior capsule contracture caused GIRD7, 8). Burkhurt et al. also reported that baseball players with GIRD have a thickened posterior capsule at the posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral joint-ligament complex1). Thomas et al. measured posterior capsule thickness (PCT) in their study, and confirmed the reliability and validity of PCT measurement using ultrasonography9, 10). In addition, they also revealed that the dominant shoulder has a thicker posterior capsule than the non-dominant shoulder, and that there is a significant correlation between PCT and IR ROM. Based on their study, PCT measurement can be a way to assess posterior capsule tightness in vivo.

Glenohumeral horizontal adduction (HAdd) ROM (Fig. 1B) also can be used to assess posterior capsule tightness as well as measuring IR ROM. Several previous studies have investigated the reliability and validity of HAdd ROM measurement to assess posterior shoulder tightness11,12,13). These studies indicated good to high reliability, and revealed the validity of HAdd by comparing it with IR. However, there has been no study to analyze the relationship between PCT and HAdd ROM. We hypothesized that PCT would correlate with HAdd as well as IR ROM. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the correlations between PCT and IR or HAdd ROM in order to determine which ROMs reflects posterior capsule tightness.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine collegiate baseball players, including 11 pitchers and 28 position players (age, 20.0 ± 1.36 years; height, 174.59 ± 5.47 cm; weight, 71.89 ± 7.61 kg; duration of playing baseball, 10.89 ± 2.30 years), volunteered to participate in this study. All participants were members of a baseball team that belongs to a division one collegiate league in a local region of Japan. Participants who were not able to throw at the time of measurement, and who had orthopedic and/or neurologic problems, were excluded from this study. All participants read and signed an informed consent form prior to their inclusion in this study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Health Sciences of Hokkaido University (12-9).

As measurement posture, the participant was seated upright in a chair, with one arm beside his body and the shoulder internally rotated. Our pilot study of 25 anterior-posterior shoulder radiographs showed that the middle region of the posterior capsule is located at the upper 21% between the superior and inferior angles of the scapula. Therefore, we measured the length between the scapular superior and inferior angles, and calculated 21% of the length from the superior angle as the middle region of posterior capsule height. Then, we measured PCT by using a MyLab 25 ultrasound unit (Biosound Esaote, Indianapolis, IN, USA) using a modified method of a previously reported technique9, 10). Our original device was placed on the posterior aspect of the scapula along the scapular medial border, and the ultrasound transducer, which was applied standard acoustic coupling gel, was placed between the two bars of the device to visualize the posterior capsule (Fig. 2A). The posterior capsule was identified as the tissue found immediately lateral to the glenoid labrum, between the humeral head and rotator cuff (Fig. 2B)9, 10). When the capsule was identified, the image was paused and stored to the hard drive of the ultrasound machine, and PCT was measured. We carried out another pilot study that analyzed the side-to-side difference in PCT in collegiate baseball players (n = 9; age, 23.9 ± 4.5 years; height, 173.2 ± 5.5 cm; weight, 67.2 ± 7.9 kg), which revealed a significantly thickened posterior capsule of the throwing shoulder compared with the non-throwing shoulder. This result is consistent with a previous study9). Taking our pilot study and the previous study into account, thickening of the posterior capsule could be a specific alteration of the throwing shoulder in baseball players. Therefore, in this study, we measured PCT of the throwing shoulder only. This measurement procedure was conducted twice in every shoulder, and the average of the measurements was used for statistical analysis. We also analyzed the reliability of this method using 16 healthy collegiate baseball players (age, 19.4 ± 1.0 years; height, 169.0 ± 6.6 cm; weight, 62.3 ± 5.2 kg) in order to evaluate intra- and inter-rater reliability. In the reliability study, all subjects had once undergone the procedure described above by two examiners (T. I. and T. K.). Seven days after the first observation, they visited our laboratory again, and underwent the same procedure by one examiner (T. K.).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Measurement of posterior capsule thickness. (A) Photograph, demonstrating how to use our original device to detect height of posterior capsule. (B) Ultrasonographic image, showing PCT (double arrowheads), glenoid (G), humeral head (HH), and labrum (shadow and L).

For assessment of HAdd and IR ROM, participants were asked to lie down on a table and relax. All measurements were conducted by two experienced physical therapists (T. I. and T. K.) using a digital inclinometer (Survey Techno-Science, Nagoya, Japan). For HAdd ROM measurement, one investigator put his hand on the lateral border of the subject’s scapula to restrict any scapular motion, and moved the subject’s arm to a horizontally adducted position until the investigator perceived movement of the subject’s scapula. Another investigator placed the inclinometer on the subject’s arm to measure the HAdd angle. For IR ROM measurement, the subject’s shoulder was placed at 90° abduction with the elbow flexed to 90° and the forearm in a middle position between pronation and supination. One investigator put his palm on the subject’s coracoid, while the other hand internally rotated the subject’s arm. Another investigator placed the inclinometer on the subject’s forearm to measure the IR angle.

Descriptive data included means ± SDs. In order to reveal test-retest reliability of our PCT measurements, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for both intra- and inter-rater reliability. ICC (1, 2) and ICC (2, 2) were calculated to demonstrate intra- and inter-rater reliability, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to reveal the relationships between PCT and each ROM measurement. PASW Statistics version 18 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses, and coefficients were considered significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Mean PCT, HAdd and IR were 1.24 mm ± 0.29 mm, 96.04° ± 9.97°, and 43.05° ± 9.93°, respectively.

Reliability analysis of 16 baseball players demonstrated an almost perfect intra-rater reliability (ICC (1, 2) = 0.95, p < 0.01) and an almost perfect inter-rater reliability (ICC (2, 2) = 0.98, p < 0.001).

There was a significant relationship between PCT and IR ROM (r = −0.351, p = 0.028), but there was no significant relationship between PCT and HAdd ROM (r = 0.156, p = 0.343).

DISCUSSION

The present study was conducted to test the hypothesis that PCT correlates with not only IR ROM but also HAdd ROM. We found there was no significant relationship between PCT measured by using ultrasonography and HAdd ROM, but we did find a significant correlation between PCT and IR ROM. Therefore, results of the present study clearly denied our hypothesis. Findings of the present study suggest that IR ROM deficit relates to posterior capsule tightness, even though previous studies have reported a significant correlation between IR and HAdd11,12,13).

We do not know the exact reason why we failed to show a significant relationship between PCT and HAdd ROM in the present study. However, there is a study that compared the effects of stretching on posterior shoulder tightness, such as restriction of IR and HAdd ROM, between sleeper stretch, including IR motion, and cross-body stretch, including HAdd motion. This previous study reported that cross-body stretch was more effective to reduce posterior shoulder tightness compared with sleeper stretch14). In addition, other previous studies have demonstrated that the posterior deltoid muscle was stretched with HAdd, whereas both the posterior shoulder capsule and the middle and inferior regions of the infraspinatus were not stretched with HAdd15, 16). Therefore, considering the results of this study and these previous studies, IR ROM deficit may reflect stiffness of both the posterior capsule and other soft tissue, whereas HAdd ROM restriction may reflect stiffness of only soft tissue, such as the posterior deltoid muscle, rather than the posterior capsule.

There are a few limitations in this study. First, the value of PCT in this study was relatively smaller than that in a previous study9, 10). Body mass of participants in the previous study was larger than that of participants in this study (previous study, 88.14 kg ± 4.81 kg; present study, 71.86 ± 7.5 kg). It has been reported that body mass can affect ball velocity in baseball pitching17). The difference in ball velocity might affect the distraction load, which causes posterior shoulder tightness, and, thus, PCT in this study was relatively smaller than that in the previous study. Second, the correlation coefficient obtained in the present study represents a weak correlation between PCT and IR ROM, though it is similar to that in a previous study9). Hence, there is some possibility that other tissue, such as the rotator cuff tendon or posterior deltoid muscle, restricts IR ROM. Third, humeral retroversion was not considered in this study, even though it is known to decrease IR ROM. Thomas et al. also reported that humeral retroversion is related to PCT10). Therefore, further study should consider humeral retroversion when measuring glenohumeral ROM.

Concerning clinical relevance, previous cadaveric studies have demonstrated that posterior capsule tightness augments subacromial pressure during arm elevation8, 18). Furthermore, Maenhout et al. suggested that healthy overhead-throwing athletes with GIRD demonstrate a smaller acromiohumeral distance19), which represents two-dimensional assessment of the subacromial space. Thus, posterior capsule tightness might affect shoulder problems by reducing the subacromial space and by scapular dyskinesis. Although baseball players demonstrate greater IR ROM deficit, induced by posterior shoulder tightness, of the throwing shoulder, identifying which tissue restricts posterior shoulder flexibility is reasonable to prevent throwing-related problems, because strategies to improve posterior shoulder tightness would differ depending on the tissue that induces the tightness. Therefore, we believe the results of this study can be helpful to identify the cause of posterior shoulder tightness.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB: The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology Part I: pathoanatomy and biomechanics. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19: 404–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Myers JB, Laudner KG, Pasquale MR, et al. : Glenohumeral range of motion deficits and posterior shoulder tightness in throwers with pathologic internal impingement. Am J Sports Med, 2006, 34: 385–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dines JS, Frank JB, Akerman M, et al. : Glenohumeral internal rotation deficits in baseball players with ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med, 2009, 37: 566–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tyler TF, Nicholas SJ, Lee SJ, et al. : Correction of posterior shoulder tightness is associated with symptom resolution in patients with internal impingement. Am J Sports Med, 2010, 38: 114–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wilk KE, Macrina LC, Fleisig GS, et al. : Correlation of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and total rotational motion to shoulder injuries in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39: 329–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Endo Y, Sakamoto M: Correlation of shoulder and elbow injuries with muscle tightness, core stability, and balance by longitudinal measurements in junior high school baseball players. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 689–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fitzpatrick MJ, Tibone JE, Grossman M, et al. : Development of cadaveric models of a thrower’s shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2005, 14: 49S–57S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Muraki T, Yamamoto N, Zhao KD, et al. : Effects of posterior capsule tightness on subacromial contact behavior during shoulder motions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21: 1160–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thomas SJ, Swanik CB, Higginson JS, et al. : A bilateral comparison of posterior capsule thickness and its correlation with glenohumeral range of motion and scapular upward rotation in collegiate baseball players. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20: 708–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thomas SJ, Swanik CB, Kaminski TW, et al. : Humeral retroversion and its association with posterior capsule thickness in collegiate baseball players. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21: 910–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tyler TF, Roy T, Nicholas SJ, et al. : Reliability and validity of a new method of measuring posterior shoulder tightness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1999, 29: 262–269, discussion 270–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Laudner KG, Stanek JM, Meister K: Assessing posterior shoulder contracture: the reliability and validity of measuring glenohumeral joint horizontal adduction. J Athl Train, 2006, 41: 375–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Myers JB, Oyama S, Wassinger CA, et al. : Reliability, precision, accuracy, and validity of posterior shoulder tightness assessment in overhead athletes. Am J Sports Med, 2007, 35: 1922–1930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McClure P, Balaicuis J, Heiland D, et al. : A randomized controlled comparison of stretching procedures for posterior shoulder tightness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2007, 37: 108–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Muraki T, Aoki M, Uchiyama E, et al. : The effect of arm position on stretching of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and posterior portion of deltoid muscles: a cadaveric study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2006, 21: 474–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Izumi T, Aoki M, Muraki T, et al. : Stretching positions for the posterior capsule of the glenohumeral joint: strain measurement using cadaver specimens. Am J Sports Med, 2008, 36: 2014–2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Werner SL, Suri M, Guido JA, Jr, et al. : Relationships between ball velocity and throwing mechanics in collegiate baseball pitchers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, 17: 905–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mihata T, Gates J, McGarry MH, et al. : Effect of posterior shoulder tightness on internal impingement in a cadaveric model of throwing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23: 548–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maenhout A, Van Eessel V, Van Dyck L, et al. : Quantifying acromiohumeral distance in overhead athletes with glenohumeral internal rotation loss and the influence of a stretching program. Am J Sports Med, 2012, 40: 2105–2112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Physical Therapy Science are provided here courtesy of Society of Physical Therapy Science

RESOURCES