Skip to main content
Journal of Physical Therapy Science logoLink to Journal of Physical Therapy Science
. 2015 May 26;27(5):1401–1405. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1401

Risk factors for fatigue and stress among Korean police officers

Jong-Min Seok 1,2, Jae-Hwan Cho 3, Woo-Jin Jeon 1, Jae-Ouk Ahn 4,*
PMCID: PMC4483407  PMID: 26157229

Abstract

[Purpose] This study investigated factors that affect the health of police officers by analyzing job stress, psychosocial stress, and fatigue faced by police officers in order to provide basic data for the efficient management of police officers and future comparative research. [Subjects and Methods] Police officers admitted to the National Police Hospital from March to May 2013 were surveyed to investigate their degree of stress. The questionnaire consisted of 4 areas related to patient characteristics: general and demographic characteristics factors, job stress, psychosocial stress, and fatigue. [Results] The analysis of the relationships among job stress, psychosocial health, and fatigue showed the 0%, 44.7%, and 82% of those with healthy, potential, and high risks of stress had high job stress, respectively. Meanwhile, 40.8% and 77.9% of subjects with normal and high risks of fatigue had high job stress. [Conclusion] The studies can be used as basic and comparative data for the prevention and early control of job-related diseases for police officers.

Key word: Fatigue

INTRODUCTION

Modern society is characterized by a complex and rapidly changing social structure with advances in technology. As police officers are in charge of citizens’ safety and are at the frontline of a rapidly changing and complex world, understanding and managing factors threatening the physical and mental health of police officers is important in order for them to be able to fulfill their duties. In particular, chronic job stress and fatigue can threaten physical and mental health1,2,3,4,5), and these have been studied in people of various occupations in Korea and abroad6,7,8).

Police officers are assigned positions on the basis of service sectors and specialty codes, but the majority perform shift work. Such a work pattern perturbs biological rhythms such as sleep, rest, and eating cycles, necessitating adaptations, which greatly burden health9). Crimes, a focus of police officers, are becoming more violent and sophisticated; importantly, they increase the difficulty and volume of work. In addition, exposure to danger, the rigid paramilitary hierarchical structure of police organizations, lack of communication, and promotion congestion can all potentially act as stress-triggering factors for police officers10). Because of the nature of police duties and special environmental factors associated with this career, being a police officer is considered one of the most stressful occupations11). Although many studies on police officers, including studies about their stress8,9,10,11,12,13) and service characteristics14, 15), are underway in Korea, they are limited to certain areas and are therefore not comprehensive studies of job stress, psychosocial health, and fatigue related to the job characteristics of police officers. Thus, this study investigated the factors that affect the health of police officers by studying job stress, psychosocial stress, and fatigue in order to provide basic data for the efficient management of police officers and future comparative research.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study involved a survey targeting police officers admitted to the National Police Hospital from March to May 2013 to investigate their degree of stress The questionnaire was sent to 400 randomly selected patients, and the data of 353 police officers were analyzed after excluding 47 police officers who did not correctly fill out or respond to the questionnaire. This self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted after patients were given a detailed explanation of the purpose of the survey and the response method. The questionnaire consisted of 4 areas: general and demographic characteristics, job stress, psychosocial stress, and fatigue. SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, USA) was used to analyze the data as follows. First, technical statistical analysis was performed for the general subject characteristics. Second, the frequency and percentage were obtained from the frequency analysis. Third, Pearson’s χ2 test was performed to analyze the relationships among general characteristics, job stress, psychosocial stress, and fatigue. Finally, multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for high fatigue by calculating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Compared to the median reference values of occupational stress for males on the Korean occupational stress scale (KOSS), in the job stress category, stress by task demand had relatively high scores, factors of instability and reward deficiency had low scores, and others had similar scores. Regarding the subcategories of job stress for police officers, task demand was the factor with the highest stress, followed by task autonomy and organizational system (Table 1). The overall mean ± SD score of psychosocial stress (PWI-SF) was 21.34 ± 6.61; that of fatigue (MSF) was 80.98 ± 17.65, with scores ≤92 and >92 (i.e., the 75th percentile) considered normal and high fatigue, respectively. The distributions of job stress, psychosocial stress, and fatigue were as follows. Job stress was mostly similar between the low- and high-stress groups. In the low- and high-stress groups, 62.3% and 37.7% reported job autonomy stress, respectively; meanwhile, 62.9% and 37.1% job instability stress, respectively. Psychosocial health in the healthy, potential stress, and high-stress groups was 4.0%, 77.9%, and 18.1%, respectively. Meanwhile, fatigue in the normal and high-stress groups was 75.6% and 24.4%, respectively (Table 2). Analysis of the relationship between personal characteristics and job stress showed that age, marital status, and education level were not significantly associated with job stress (p > 0.05). However, marital status tended to be associated with job stress (p < 0.1). Analysis of service characteristics and job stress showed that 29.6%, 32.4%, 55.5%, 52.4% of those with a service length ≤10, 11–20, 21–30, and ≥31 years had high job stress, respectively (χ2 = 11.142). Regarding service type, 45.4% and 56.1% of those in ordinary service jobs and shift work had high job stress, respectively (χ2 = 3.947, p < 0.05). There was no association between job stress and rank, post, the number of service years at a specific division, or service area (p > 0.05). However, job stress tended to be associated with rank and post (p < 0.1). Analysis of the relationship between job stress, and life and chronic disease characteristics showed that 68.6% and 43.8% of non-exercisers had high job stress, respectively (χ2 = 15.983, p < 0.05); meanwhile, there was no association between job stress and smoking, drinking, driving, chronic diseases, or injuries (p > 0.05, Table 3). Analysis of the relationship between psychosocial stress and personal characteristics showed that age, marital status, and education level were not associated with psychosocial stress (p > 0.05). Analysis of the relationship between psychosocial stress and service characteristics showed that the number of service years, rank, post, the number of service years at a specific division, service type, and service area were not associated with psychosocial stress (p > 0.05). However, rank tended to be associated with psychosocial stress (p < 0.1). Analysis of the relationship between psychosocial health and life and chronic disease characteristics showed that 13.4 and 37.7% of non-smokers had a high risk of psychosocial stress, respectively (p < 0.05); meanwhile, 30.2% and 14.2% of non-exercisers had a high risk of psychosocial stress, respectively (p < 0.05). Furthermore, 13.3% of 20.6% of those without and with chronic diseases or injury had a high risk of psychosocial stress, respectively (p < 0.05). Drinking and driving were not associated with psychosocial stress (p > 0.05, Table 4). Analysis of the relationship between personal characteristics and fatigue showed no associations with respect to age group, marital status, or education level (p > 0.05). Analysis of the relationship between service characteristics and fatigue showed that 20.5% and 29.7% of ordinary service police officers and shift workers had a high risk of fatigue, respectively (χ2 = 3.984, p < 0.05). However, there were no associations between fatigue and service length, rank, post, or service length at a certain section or service area (p > 0.05). Analysis of the relationship between life and chronic disease characteristics and fatigue showed that 20.4% and 40.6% of non-smokers and smokers had a high risk of fatigue, respectively (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, 36.0% and 20.6% of non-exercisers and exercises had a high risk of fatigue, respectively (p < 0.05). There were no associations between fatigue and driving, chronic diseases, or injuries (p > 0.05, Table 5). Analysis of the relationships among job stress, psychosocial health, and fatigue showed that 0%, 44.7%, and 82.8% of the healthy, potential risk, and high-risk psychosocial stress groups had high job stress, respectively (χ2 = 44.618, p < 0.05). Meanwhile, 40.8% and 77.9% of subjects with normal and high risks of fatigue had high job stress, respectively (χ2 = 35.781, p < 0.05, Table 6).

Table 1. Levels of job stress between the KOSS in Korean men and police officers.

Variables KOSS Police officers


Median Mean±SD Median Rank
Total 50.8 47.9 ± 9.2 47.9
Physical environment 44.5 47.3 ± 19.6 44.4 5
Job demand 50.1 52.9 ± 15.1 54.2 1
Insufficient job control 53.4 54.3 ± 13.1 53.3 2
Interpersonal conflict 33.4 40.2 ± 13.9 33.3 8
Job insecurity 50.1 43.7 ± 12.1 44.4 5
Organization system 52.4 51.7 ± 15.1 52.4 3
Lack of reward 66.7 48.4 ± 14.7 50.0 4
Occupational climate 41.7 45.1 ± 15.9 41.6 7

KOSS: Korean occupational stress scale

Table 2. Frequencies of occupational stress, psychosocial distress, and fatigue (N = 353).

Variables Classification Frequency (%)
Occupational stress Physical environment Low 192 (54.4)
High 161 (45.6)

Job demand Low 208 (58.9)
High 145 (41.1)

Insufficient job control Low 220 (62.3)
High 133 (37.7)

Interpersonal conflict Low 184 (52.1)
High 169 (47.9)

Job insecurity Low 222 (62.9)
High 131 (37.1)

Organization system Low 204 (57.8)
High 149 (42.2)

Lack of reward Low 213 (60.3)
High 140 (39.7)

Occupational climate Low 190 (53.8)
High 163 (46.2)

Total Low 177 (50.1)
High 176 (49.9)

Psychosocial distress Healthy 14 (4.0)
Potential risk 275 (77.9)
High risk 64 (18.1)

Fatigue Normal risk 267 (75.6)
High risk 86 (24.4)

Table 3. Associations between general characteristics and job stress (N= 353).

Variables Classification Frequency (%)

Low High
Age (years) ≤ 40 14 (45.2) 17 (54.8)
41–50 33 (46.5) 38 (53.5)
≥ 51 130 (51.8) 121 (48.2)

Marital status Single 16 (69.6) 7 (30.4)
Married 161 (48.8) 169 (51.2)

Education level High school 51 (48.6) 54 (51.4)
College 62 (51.7) 58 (48.3)
≥ University 64 (50.0) 64 (50.0)

Years of service ≤ 10 19 (70.4) 8 (29.6)
11–20 25 (67.6) 12 (32.4)
21–30 65 (44.5) 81 (55.5)
≥ 31yr 68 (47.6) 75 (52.4)

Class ≤ Senior Policeman 17 (73.9) 6 (26.1)
Assistant Inspector 27 (54.0) 23 (46.0)
Inspector 95 (46.6) 109 (53.4)
Senior Inspector 31 (55.4) 25 (44.6)
≥ Superintendent 7 (35.0) 13 (65.0)

Job types Police affairs 56 (50.5) 55 (49.5)
Life security 65 (45.1) 79 (54.9)
Traffic police 8 (61.5) 5 (38.5)
Guard police 25 (69.4) 11 (30.6)
Investigate − Detective 16 (51.6) 15 (48.4)
Intelligence − Peace preservation police 7 (50.0) 7 (50.0)
Maritime Police etc. 0 4 (100)

Years of service at department ≤ 10 80 (50.6) 79 (49.4)
11–20 19 (50.0) 19 (50.0)
21–30 43 (49.4) 44 (50.6)
≥ 31yr 35 (50.0) 35 (50.0)

Work type Fix 112 (54.6) 93 (45.4)
Shift 65 (43.9) 83 (56.1)

Work area Seoul& Gyeonggi-do 66 (52.0) 61 (48.0)
Gangwon-do 15 (53.6) 13 (46.4)
Chungcheong-do 33 (49.3) 34 (50.7)
Gyeongsang-do 35 (44.3) 44 (55.7)
Jeolla-do & Jeju-do 28 (53.8) 24 (46.2)

Smoking status Non-smoker 103 (50.5) 101 (49.5)
Smoker 30 (43.5) 39 (56.5)
Ex-smoker 44 (55.0) 36 (45.0)

Smoking No 147 (51.8) 137 (48.2)
Yes 30 (43.5) 39 (56.5)

Alcohol consumption No 29 (52.7) 26 (47.3)
Yes 148 (49.7) 150 (50.3)

Driving No 10 (41.7) 14 (58.3)
Yes 167 (50.8) 162 (49.2)

Exercise No 27 (31.4) 59 (68.6)
Yes 150 (56.2) 117 (43.8)

Chronic disease & damage No 64 (53.3) 56 (46.7)
Yes 113 (48.5) 120 (51.5)

Table 4. Associations between general characteristics and psychosocial stress (N= 353).

Variables Classification n (%)

Low High
Age (years) ≤40 14 (45.2) 17 (54.8)
41–50 33 (46.5) 38 (53.5)
≥51 130 (51.8) 121(48.2)

Marital status Single 16 (69.6) 7 (30.4)
Married 161 (48.8) 169 (51.2)

Education level High school 51 (48.6) 54 (51.4)
College 62 (51.7) 58 (48.3)
≥University 64 (50.0) 64 (50.0)

Years of service ≤10 19 (70.4) 8 (29.6)
11–20 25 (67.6) 12 (32.4)
21–30 65 (44.5) 81 (55.5)
≥31yr 68 (47.6) 75 (52.4)

Class ≤Senior Policeman 17 (73.9) 6 (26.1)
Assistant Inspector 27 (54.0) 23 (46.0)
Inspector 95 (46.6) 109 (53.4)
Senior Inspector 31 (55.4) 25 (44.6)
≥Superintendent 7 (35.0) 13 (65.0)

Job types Police affairs 56 (50.5) 55 (49.5)
Life security 65 (45.1) 79 (54.9)
Traffic police 8 (61.5) 5 (38.5)
Guard police 25 (69.4) 11 (30.6)
Investigate-Detective 16 (51.6) 15 (48.4)
Intelligence-Peace preservation police 7 (50.0) 7 (50.0)
Maritime Police etc. 0 4 (100)

Years of service at department ≤10 80 (50.6) 79 (49.4)
11–20 19 (50.0) 19 (50.0)
21–30 43 (49.4) 44 (50.6)
≥31yr 35 (50.0) 35 (50.0)

Work type Fixed 112 (54.6) 93 (45.4)
Shift 65 (43.9) 83 (56.1)

Work area Seoul & Gyeonggi-do 66 (52.0) 61 (48.0)
Gangwon-do 15 (53.6) 13 (46.4)
Chungcheong-do 33 (49.3) 34 (50.7)
Gyeongsang-do 35 (44.3) 44 (55.7)
Jeolla-do & Jeju-do 28 (53.8) 24 (46.2)

Smoking status Non-smoker 103 (50.5) 101 (49.5)
Smoker 30 (43.5) 39 (56.5)
Ex-smoker 44 (55.0) 36 (45.0)

Smoking No 147 (51.8) 137 (48.2)
Yes 30 (43.5) 39 (56.5)

Alcohol drinking No 29 (52.7) 26 (47.3)
Yes 148 (49.7) 150 (50.3)

Drive No 10 (41.7) 14 (58.3)
Yes 167 (50.8) 162 (49.2)

Exercise No 27 (31.4) 59 (68.6)
Yes 150 (56.2) 117 (43.8)

Chronic disease & damage No 64 (53.3) 56 (46.7)
Yes 113 (48.5) 120 (51.5)

Table 5. Associations between general characteristics and fatigue (N= 353).

Variables Classification n (%)

Healthy potentiality High Risk
Age group ≤40 2 (6.5) 23 (74.2) 6 (19.4)
41–50 3 (4.2) 56 (78.9) 12 (16.9)
≥51 9 (3.6) 196 (78.1) 46 (18.3)

Marrital status Single 1 (4.3) 20 (87.0) 2 (8.7)
Married 13 (3.9) 255 (77.3) 62 (18.8)

Education level High school 3 (2.9) 82 (78.1) 20 (19.0)
College 4 (3.3) 99 (82.5) 17 (14.2)
≥University 7 (5.5) 94 (73.4) 27 (21.1)

Years of service ≤10 1 (3.7) 25 (92.6) 1 (3.7)
11–20 1 (2.7) 30 (81.1) 6 (16.2)
21–30 8 (5.5) 114 (78.1) 24 (16.4)
≥31yr 4 (2.8) 106 (74.1) 33 (23.1)

Class ≤Senior Policeman 1 (4.3) 21 (91.3) 1 (4.3)
Assistant Inspector 1 (2.0) 44 (88.0) 5 (10.0)
Inspector 7 (3.4) 153 (75.0) 44 (21.6)
Senior Inspector 4 (7.1) 45 (80.4) 7 (12.5)
≥Superintendent 1 (5.0) 12 (60.0) 7 (35.0)

Job types Police affairs 5 (4.5) 87 (78.4) 19 (17.1)
Life security 8 (5.6) 103 (71.5) 33 (22.9)
Traffic police 0 13 (100) 0
Guard police 1 (2.8) 31 (86.1) 4 (11.1)
Investigate − Detective 0 26 (83.9) 5 (16.1)
Intelligence-Peace preservation police 0 13 (92.9) 1 (7.1)
Maritime Police etc. 0 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0)

Period of Department worked (yr) ≤10 8 (5.1) 121 (76.6) 29 (18.4)
11–20 1 (2.6) 30 (78.9) 7 (18.4)
21–30 4 (4.6) 70 (80.5) 13 (14.9)
≥31yr 1(1.4) 54 (77.1) 15 (21.4)

Work type Fix 10 (4.9) 160 (78.0) 35 (17.1)
Shift 4 (2.7) 115 (77.7) 29 (19.6)

Work area Seoul & Gyeonggi-do 5 (3.9) 97 (76.4) 25 (19.7)
Gangwon-do 0 25 (89.3) 3 (10.7)
Chungcheong-do 5 (7.5) 49 (73.1) 13 (19.4)
Gyeongsang-do 2 (2.5) 63 (79.7) 14 (17.7)
Jeolla-do & Jeju-do 2 (3.8) 41 (78.8) 9 (17.3)

Smoking status Non-smoker 8 (3.9) 175 (85.8) 21 (10.3)
Smoker 3 (4.3) 40 (58.0) 26 (37.7)
Ex-smoker 3 (3.8) 60 (75.0) 17 (21.3)

Smoking No 11 (3.9) 235 (82.7) 38 (13.4)
Yes 3 (4.3) 40 (58.0) 26 (37.7)

Alcohol drinking No 4 (7.3) 43 (78.2) 8 (14.5)
Yes 10 (3.4) 232 (77.9) 56 (18.8)

Driving No 1 (4.2) 18 (75.0) 5 (20.8)
Yes 13 (4.0) 257 (78.1) 59 (17.9)

Exercise No 1 (1.2) 59 (68.6) 26 (30.2)
Yes 13 (4.9) 216 (80.9) 38 (14.2)

Chronic disease & damage No 10 (8.3) 94 (78.3) 16 (13.3)

Table 6. Associations among job stress, psychosocial stress, and fatigue.

Variables Classification n (%)

Low High
Psychosocial distress Healthy 14 (100) 0
Potential risk 152 (55.3) 123 (44.7)
High risk 11 (17.2) 53 (82.8)
Fatigue Normal 158 (59.2) 109 (40.8)

DISCUSSION

Stress is associated with almost all human diseases including various physical diseases15). Job stress negatively affects physical, mental, behavioral, and emotional health and exacerbates diseases and risk factors16). In addition to the relationship between job stress and disease, police officers’ stress continues to be studied. Outside Korea, Arter reports that stress is related to police officers’ accidents17). Meanwhile, in Korea, Kim reports that 59.3% of respondents had the highest stress level, and more than 80% had high stress levels, which correspond to a psychological exhaustion state caused by stress18). In the present study, the mean stress level of police officers on the KOSS was 47.96 ± 9.2 points. Meanwhile, Kim used a short form of the KOSS and reports the mean job stress of police officers was 60.02 ± 2.49 points19). Furthermore, Son et al.20) report that stress was 2.42 on a 4-point scale, which is equivalent to 60.5 points if converted to a 100-point scale. The discrepancies in stress level are likely due to the characteristics of the subjects in the present study, who tended to be of advanced age, have experience in police organizations, and have an interest in welfare policy; therefore, they seemed to have benefited. Firefighters, who are similar to police officers in many aspects, are reported to have a mean job stress level of 48.60 ± 9.89 on the KOSS6), which is similar to that in police officers in the present study. In the present study, the overall means and standard deviations of psychosocial stress (PWI-SF) fatigue (MSF) were 21.34 ± 6.61 80.98 ± 17.65, respectively. A study of Korean firefighters similar to the present study in many ways reports a mean PWI-SF of 22.4 ± 7.121), while a study of fatigue in domestic workers by Chang et al. reports a mean MSF of 78 ± 19.022). No associations between general personal characteristics and job stress were found in the present study. Studies of job stress in Korean police officers, such as that by Son et al., report significant associations of job stress with age and marital status20). Meanwhile, another study reports job stress among police officers aged 36–40 years is significantly high22); however, Kim21) did not find such an association. A study of social stress in firefighters reports that those under younger than 40 years had higher stress than those older than 40 years23). The relationship between age and fatigue remains controversial: one study reports no significant association in people 18–50 years old and decreased stress in women younger than 50 years24), whereas another study reports significantly higher fatigue for women, and younger, unmarried, and highly educated people25). The present study found no associations of age with job stress, psychosocial stress, and fatigue. This appears to be due to differences in the population and the classification standard between the present and previous studies. In particular, in this study, subjects in their 50s were predominant. Furthermore, there were limitations in obtaining information, because the subjects were in the hospital. This study has some limitations. First, this study did not compare results between genders because of the absence of female subjects, even though the absence is due to the nature of the law enforcement occupation, which largely consists of male personnel. Another limitation is that subjects in their 50s were predominant; this may be a confounding factor, because the subjects were collected from a hospital, which is unusual in this context. Previous studies frequently report gender-specific associations between stress and fatigue. The KOSS, a Korean job stress measurement tool developed by Chang et al. may have failed to reflect the unique characteristics of police officers. In this regard, modifying the content in order to better reflect the characteristics of police officers should be considered as was done in the study of Moon26). Personality characteristics and family stress should also be considered in future studies as they influence fatigue. Regular studies of stress and fatigue of police officers such as the present one as well as studies aiming to improve factors affecting stress and fatigue will help improve the mental health of individual police officers as well as the safety and personnel management of police organizations. Thus, such studies can be used for basic and comparative data for the prevention and early control of job-related diseases in police officers.

Acknowledgments

Jong-Min Seok, Jae-Hwan Cho and Woo-Jin Jeon equally contributed to this work. They are co-first authors. This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund (No. 20130580).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Thoits PA: Dimensions of life events that influence psychological distress: an evaluation and synthesis of the literature, in Psychosocial Stress: Trends in Theory and Research. Edited by Kaplan HB. New York: Academic Press, 1983, pp 33–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jeong YG, Jeong YJ, Bang JA: Effect of social support on parenting stress of Korean mothers of children with cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 1339–1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gima H, Ohgi S, Fujiwara T, et al. : Stress behavior in premature infants with periventricular leukomalacia. J Phys Ther Sci, 2010, 22: 109–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kai S, Koga M: Autonomic nerve responses in a psychological stress task and subsequent slow breathing. Phys Ther Sci. 2012, 24: 257–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maruoka H, Komaki K, Inoue K: Effects of muscle stress on oxidative stress. Phys Ther Sci. 2007, 19: 273–276. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Choi MS, Ji DH, Kim JW: Job stress level and it’s related factors in firefighters. JKAIS, 2012, 13: 4917–4926. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Croon EM, Blonk RW, de Zwart BC, et al. : Job stress, fatigue, and job dissatisfaction in Dutch lorry drivers: towards an occupation specific model of job demands and control. Occup Environ Med, 2002, 59: 356–361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roh H, Lee D, Kim Y: Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and their associations with job stress in female caregivers living in South Korea. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 665–669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peak KJ: Policing America: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Burke RJ, Mikkelsen A: Burnout, job stress and attitudes towards the use of force by Norwegian police officers. Policing, 2005, 28: 269–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anderson GS, Litzenberger R, Plecas D: Physical evidence of police officer stress. Policing, 2002, 25: 399–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee H, Choi E, Jung W: A study on dealing with the stress of police officer—focused on medical model and organizational health model—. Korea Security Science Association, 2007, 13: 403–22.
  • 13.Kim G: The effects of job stress on job satisfaction and organizational commitment focused on policeman of police operation center in police organizaiton. Korean Soc Public Adm, 2005, 16: 59–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bae SM, Lee YJ, Kim SJ, et al. : Rotating shift and daytime fixed work schedules as a risk factor for depression in Korean police officers. Sleep Medicine and Psychophysiology, 2010, 17: 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kahn RL, Byosiere P: Stress in organizations. 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vlisides CE, Eddy JP, Mozie D: Stress and stressors: definition, identification and strategy for higher education constituents. Coll Stud J, 1994, 28: 122–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arter ML: Stress and deviance in policing. Deviant Behav, 2007, 29: 43–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lim SK: A study on the police official’s stress induced factors and management measures. The Korean society of private security, 2010, 15: 177–198. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim HR: The Relationship between job stress and family function of police officers. J Kor Soc Stress Med. 2012, 20: 105–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Son YJ, Song YA, Choi EY: The relationship between occupational stress and exhaustion in the police. J Kor Soc Stress Med. 2008, 16: 225–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim KH, Kim JW, Kim SH: Influences of job stressors on psychosocial well-being, fatigue and sleep sufficiency among firefighters. Kor J Occup Environ Med. 2006, 18: 232–245. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chang SJ, Koh SB, Kang MG, et al. : [Correlates of self-rated fatigue in Korean employees]. J Prev Med Pub Health, 2005, 38: 71–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cha BS, Chang SJ, Park JK, et al. : Effects of cigarette smoking on psychosicial distress and occupational risks. Kor J Preven Med, 1997, 30: 540–554. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bengtsson C, Edström K, Furunes B, et al. : Prevalence of subjectively experienced symptoms in a population sample of women with special reference to women with arterial hypertension. Scand J Prim Health Care, 1987, 5: 155–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cha KT, Kim IW, Koh SB, et al. : The association of occupational stress with self-perceived fatigue in white collar employees. Kor J Occup Environ Med, 2008, 20: 182–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moon YS: The level and influencing factors of police officers’ job stress. Korean Association for Local Government Studies, 2010, 14: 41–60. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Physical Therapy Science are provided here courtesy of Society of Physical Therapy Science

RESOURCES