Abstract
[Purpose] We examined factors affecting annual change in pulmonary function in residents previously exposed to air pollution in an area where pollution has been reduced and a long time period has elapsed. [Subjects and Methods] Data of 730 officially acknowledged victims of pollution-related illness from an annual survey during 2000 to 2009 were analyzed. The primary outcome was forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), along with factors such as age, body composition, smoking habits, respiratory symptoms, and classification of medical management (an index of the need for treatment). Multiple regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with the annual change in FEV1. [Results] Three significant factors were identified: smoking habit, classification of medical management, and gender. Smoking habits and classification of medical management had stronger effects on the annual change in FEV1 than gender. [Conclusion] With an improved environment, continuation of smoking accelerates the decline in FEV1.
Key words: Air pollution-related illness, Longitudinal study, Pulmonary function
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, air pollution has been a serious problem in some Asian countries. An important consequence of air pollution is its effect on health, particularly on the respiratory system1, 2). As an assessment of respiratory health, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is an important measure of the health of older people. The annual decline in FEV1 is an important predictor of morbidity and mortality related to cardiovascular disease3). Usually, FEV1 reaches a maximum in the third decade of life and then decreases gradually with age4, 5). In addition to physiologic factors such as aging, other factors influence the decline in FEV1. Importantly, cigarette smoking accelerates the age-related decline in FEV16). Air pollution, as well as respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic bronchitis, also causes a more rapid decline in FEV12, 7, 8). Respiratory symptoms, including dyspnea, wheezing, coughing, and sputum production, occur as a result of air pollution2), and reflect airway inflammation9). However, it is not clear if patients with respiratory symptoms caused by air pollution experience an accelerated decline in FEV1.
Because of rapid industrialization in the 1960s in Japan, air pollution caused by flue gas emitted from industrial plants became a serious problem10). To address the issue of air pollution, the government devised two laws11). One of the measures, the Air Pollution Control Law, was intended to improve the environment. This law regulated acceptable levels of air pollutants and implemented measures aimed at preventing pollution. The acceptable level of sodium dioxide (SO2) was stated to be 40 parts per billion (ppb), that of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was 20 ppb (until 1978, when it was changed to 40 ppb), and the acceptable level of suspended particulate matter (SPM) was ≤100 µg/m3. Air environmental conditions improved as evidenced by reports from the Air Pollution Office (comprising the General Environmental Air Measurement Office and Motor Exhaust Measurement Office). As an example, Fig. 1 shows the average annual levels of SO2, NO2 and SPM recorded in Mizushima district from 1969 to 200912, 13). The level of pollutants decreased to below the minimum acceptable level from the mid-1970s. The other measure, the Pollution-related Health Damage Compensation Law, protects the cultural lives and health of people. It compensates officially acknowledged victims with pollution-related illnesses for medical fees and other medical services (e.g., medications).
Fig. 1.
Concentration of air pollutants in the Mizushima district of Kurashiki from 1969 to 200910, 11)
Decades have passed since air pollution was a serious problem in Japan. Environmental conditions have improved over time, as has the help and aid for affected individuals. Many studies on air pollution have focused on the immediate or relatively short-term effects on measures of health14,15,16). There is a lack of studies in settings in which the environment has improved and a long period of time has elapsed. Our research team has reported several longitudinal studies that targeted officially acknowledged victims with pollution-related illness12, 13, 17). However, in one of those studies, smokers were excluded to confine observations to the effect of air pollution12). In our previous report examining the lung function of officially acknowledged victims with pollution-related illness in two geographical areas within Japan, smokers were excluded for the same reason13). Those two studies found that the annual change in FEV1 in non-smokers who were officially acknowledged victims with pollution-related illness was within the normal range. However, those studies were limited in their application because the effect of smoking was not examined and because factors associated with the annual change of FEV1 were not clear. If the factor associated with a greater decline in FEV1 became clear, it could assist in maintaining lung health in countries in which air pollution is present. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to examine the factors, including cigarette smoking, associated with the annual change in FEV1 of officially acknowledged victims with pollution-related illness in settings in which the environment has improved and a long period of time has elapsed. The present study is unique in that the investigation is a longitudinal study of victims in an area in Japan in which air pollution was once a serious problem but where, over the years, air quality has improved.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The present study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (Nagasaki, Japan). This study was undertaken by analyses of retrospective data obtained from annual health surveys conducted with officially acknowledged victims of air pollution-related illnesses from the Mizushima district of Kurashiki (Okayama Prefecture, Japan) between 2000 and 2009. This area suffered from air pollution during 1960–1970, but the environment improved thereafter.
Officially acknowledged victims of air pollution-related illnesses were registered after fulfilling two main conditions in the Pollution-related Health Damage Special Measures Law (1969) and Pollution-related Health Damage Compensation Law (1973). The first requirement was to register a victim that had been diagnosed to have an air pollution-related illness, such as asthma or chronic bronchitis, by a respiratory physician. Respiratory diseases attributed to air pollution in the Pollution-related Health Damage Compensation Law were categorized into four groups: asthma, chronic bronchitis, a combination of asthma and chronic bronchitis, or another respiratory disease. The diagnosis was made based on the results of medical examinations by certified respiratory physicians and official requirements of the law. Chronic bronchitis was diagnosed by the presence of chronic and copious amounts of sputum and a persistent cough. Asthma was diagnosed by the presence of recurrent episodes of dyspnea and wheezing. The second requirement was that individuals had to reside or spend ≥8 h per day in an area specified as having significant air pollution. Table 1 denotes the time required for certification of exposure to air pollution. They were different for each disease and area in which the subject resided or spent time (including work time).
Table 1. Time required for certification of exposure to air pollution.
| Category | Chronic bronchitis | Asthma |
| A (months) | 24 | 12 |
| B (months) | 48 | 30 |
| C (months) | 36 | 18 |
Category A: subject resided in the designated area before 1973.
Category B: subject did not reside in the designated area but spent ≥8 h/day in the designated area.
Category C: subject resided in the designated area and then relocated, but returned for work in the designated area for ≥8 h/day.
Figure 2 is a flowchart showing the study’s selection process. This was similar to the subjects of a study by Tanaka et al.12, 13). In 2009, the number of officially acknowledged victims of air pollution-related illness in Kurashiki was 1392. Of these, 774 (56%) were ≥65 years of age in 2009. Subjects who had health surveys over a 7 year period were selected. However, 44 individuals were subsequently excluded from this analysis because they had not undergone annual spirometry on ≥7 occasions. Therefore, data of 730 subjects were analyzed in the present study.
Fig. 2.
Flow diagram of the study
Pulmonary function was measured by spirometry (FUDAC 70; Fukuda Sangyo Inc., Chiba, Japan). Officially acknowledged victims of air pollution-related illnesses were required to undergo spirometry once a year. Spirometry was undertaken by trained staff at Mizushima Kyodo Hospital (Okayama, Japan). Following standardized instructions, spirometry was repeated until ≥3 reproducible forced expiratory volume-time curve curves had been obtained. A nose-clip was applied to each subject, and subjects were in the sitting position during tests. In our analyses, values of forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1 were used, and these are presented in milliliters or as a percentage of the predicted value (% FVC and % FEV1) derived from the predicted equations. Percentage FVC was calculated using the equation reported by Baldwin and colleagues18). Percentage FEV1 was calculated using the equation reported by Berglund and colleagues19).
Smoking habit was divided into two groups: non-smoker or smoker (including former smokers) as of the year 2000. Respiratory symptoms evaluated comprised “breathlessness”, “wheezing” and “cough and sputum production”. Respiratory physicians evaluated the presence and severity of symptoms during medical interviews according to a five-grade system. Classification of medical management referred to the extent to which an individual required medical care (e.g., frequency of medical care and necessity for hospitalization). This parameter was also evaluated according to a five-grade system (Table 2).
Table 2. Severity of respiratory symptoms and classification of medical management.
| Grade | Breathlessness | Wheeze | Cough and sputum production |
Medical management classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when dressing or undressing | Severe episodes ≥10 days/month during the last year | Daily cough and sputum, with a large amount of sputum or difficulty clearing sputum | Requires hospitalization for exacerbation of symptoms and always requires assistance with activity during daily living |
| 2 | Breathless after walking about 50 m or after a few minutes on level ground | Severe episodes ≥5 days/month during the last year, or mild episodes ≥10 days/month during the last year | Daily cough and sputum, with a moderate amount of sputum or difficulty clearing sputum | Always needs medical treatment and hospitalization required for exacerbation of symptoms |
| 3 | Breathless when walking on level ground and keeping up with people of the same age, but not breathless when walking at own pace | Severe episodes ≥1 day/month during the last year, or mild episodes ≥5 days/month during the last year | Daily cough and sputum, but not troublesome during daily life | Always needs medical treatment and sometimes needs hospitalization |
| 4 | Breathless when walking up a slight hill or the stairs | Mild episodes ≥1 day/month during the last year | Daily cough and sputum for ≤3 months/year | Always needs to consult a doctor and sometimes needs respiratory medication |
| 5 | Breathless only during strenuous exercise | No episodes of wheezing | No cough or sputum | No need for medical management |
Statistical analyses were conducted using PASW version 18 (SPSS, Armonk. NY, USA). Values for the mean ± standard deviation were calculated for continuous variables. The regression coefficient for the annual mean change in FEV1 was calculated using simple linear regression analyses. Further, bivariate analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between the annual change in FEV1 and other factors. Spearman rank correlation analyses, Mann-Whitney test, and Kruskal-Wallis test were included in bivariate analyses. Factors found to be independent variables associated with the annual change in FEV1 in bivariate analyses were evaluated stepwise in multiple regression analyses. Significance levels of 10% for bivariate analyses and 5% for multiple regression analyses were adopted. In additional analyses to examine the relationship between annual change in FEV1 and percentage predicted FEV1, Pearson correlation analyses were carried out with a significance level set at 5%.
RESULTS
Characteristics of subjects measured in the year 2000 are shown in Table 3. There were more females (63%) than males (37%), and more non-smokers (78%) than smokers (22%). Categories of respiratory symptoms and classifications of medical management were rationalized into two or three groups.
Table 3. Characteristics of the patient cohort as measured in the year 2000.
| Characteristic | Mean ± SD or n (%) |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 68.8 ± 7.6 |
| Male gender, n | 272 (37) |
| Height, cm | 153.2 ± 8.5 |
| Weight, kg | 56.3 ± 10.1 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.9 ± 3.7 |
| Smoking habit, n | |
| Non-smoker | 567 (78) |
| Smoker | 163 (22) |
| FEV1, mL | 1546 ± 561 |
| % pred FEV1 | 7 ± 11 |
| FVC, mL | 2559 ± 750 |
| % pred FVC | 9 ± 21 |
| FEV1 annual change, mL/year | −29 ± 32 |
| Disease, n | |
| Asthma | 218 (30) |
| CB | 411 (56) |
| Asthma and CB | 97 (13) |
| Others | 4 (1) |
| Respiratory symptoms | |
| Breathlessness, n | |
| Grades 1–3 | 180 (25) |
| Grade 4 | 483 (66) |
| Grade 5 | 64 (9) |
| Wheeze,n | |
| Grades 1–3 | 207 (28) |
| Grade 4 | 276 (38) |
| Grade 5 | 247 (34) |
| Cough and sputum production, n | |
| Grades 1–3 | 373 (51) |
| Grades 4–5 | 357 (49) |
| Medical management classification, n | |
| Grades 1–3 | 192 (26) |
| Grades 4–5 | 538 (74) |
BMI: body mass index; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; % pred FEV1: percentage of the predicted value of forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC: Forced vital capacity; % pred VC: percentage of the predicted value of forced vital capacity; CB: chronic bronchitis; Other: other conditions such as pulmonary emphysema
Tables 4and 5 provide the results of bivariate analyses investigating the relationship between the annual change in FEV1 and other factors. Results of bivariate analyses showed that sex, height, weight, smoking habit, respiratory disease, all respiratory symptoms, and classification of medical management were significant factors associated with the annual change in FEV1 (p < 0.1). The annual change in FEV1 in males significantly exceeded that observed in females (p < 0.05). The annual change in FEV1 was also accelerated by smoking. People who had more severe symptoms showed a slower decline than people who had mild symptoms. In addition, those who required more medical treatment and assistance with activities of daily living had a slower annual decline in FEV1 than people who did not require these interventions.
Table 4. Correlation coefficients (r) and significance levels (p) of annual changes in FEV1.
| Factor | r |
|---|---|
| Age | 0.011 |
| Height | −0.100* |
| Weight | 0.034 |
*p < 0.1
Table 5. Annual change in FEV1 grouped according to subject characteristics by bivariate analyses.
| Factor | ΔFEV1 (mL/year) |
|---|---|
| Gender* | |
| Male | −36 ± 40 |
| Female | −25 ± 25 |
| Smoking habit* | |
| Non-smoker | −25 ± 29 |
| Smoker | −41 ± 38 |
| Respiratory disease* | |
| Asthma | −23 ± 31 |
| CB | −31 ± 32 |
| Asthma and CB | −32 ± 32 |
| Respiratory symptoms | |
| Breathlessness* | |
| Grades 1–3 | −20 ± 30 |
| Grade 4 | −31 ± 33 |
| Grade 5 | −33 ± 25 |
| Wheeze* | |
| Grades 1–3 | −22 ± 31 |
| Grade 4 | −29 ± 32 |
| Grade 5 | −33 ± 32 |
| Cough and sputum* | |
| Grades 1–3 | −26 ± 31 |
| Grades 4–5 | −31 ± 33 |
| Medical management classification* | |
| Grades 1–3 | −20 ± 30 |
| Grades 4–5 | −32 ± 32 |
Mean ± SD; *p<0.1; ΔFEV1, annual change in FEV1 (mL); CB: chronic bronchitis
Results of multiple regression analyses are shown in Table 6. The strongest factor related to the annual change in FEV1 was smoking habit, followed by classification of medical management, and gender. There was no multicollinearity according to the variance inflation factor, which means no correlation between these factors.
Table 6. Predictors of annual change in FEV1.
| Factor | ΔFEV1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Β | 95% CI | VIF | |
| Smoking habit* (Smoker, 0; Non-smoker, 1) | 4.22 | 0.17 | 2.08 to 8.88 | 1.157 |
| Medical management classification* (Grades 1–3, 0; Grades 4–5, 1) | −10.92 | −0.15 | −14.15 to −3.56 | 1.007 |
| Gender* (Male, 0; Female, 1) | 6.22 | 0.09 | 2.62 to 12.86 | 1.151 |
*p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. ΔFEV1, annual change in FEV1; B, partial regression coefficient; β, standardized partial regression coefficient; CI: confidence interval; VIF: variance inflation factor
Additional analyses revealed a significant weak inverse correlation between the annual change in FEV1 and percentage predicted FEV1 (r = −0.26, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). This finding suggested that subjects with better pulmonary function showed a more rapid decline in FEV1.
Fig. 3.
The relationship between annual change in FEV1 and % predicted FEV1
DISCUSSION
This is the first study to investigate the factors associated with the annual change in FEV1 in residents previously exposed to air pollution after the environmental conditions had improved and a long time period had elapsed.
Multiple regression analyses showed that smoking habit, classification of medical management, and gender were significant factors in order of decreasing effect. The prediction equation for FEV1 is determined mainly by gender20, 21) but, interestingly, smoking habit exceeded the effects of gender in the present study. This result suggests the significant negative effects of smoking on pulmonary function. Largest decreases in FEV1 occurred in smokers, whereas the smallest decreases occurred in non-smokers. Studies have reported similar results6, 22). The annual decline in FEV1 of the non-smokers was −25 mL/year. This value falls in the range that has been reported for healthy Japanese non-smoking males and females aged >65 years (i.e., −31 to −22 mL/year)23,24,25). Even if people had suffered damage from air pollution at one time, those who were non-smokers demonstrated more preserved lung function over time.
All symptoms were identified to be significant in bivariate analyses, but none of these symptoms were found to be significant in multiple regression analyses. Some studies have suggested that males with a chronic cough or sputum production and females with a chronic cough demonstrate a rapid decline in respiratory function26, 27). As a result, respiratory symptoms are usually associated with a decline in FEV1. Conversely, another study found that respiratory symptoms do not necessarily result in a decline in FEV128). The results of our study are consistent with this latter observation.
Classification of medical management was identified as a specific factor associated with the annual change in FEV1. Presence of a single respiratory symptom did not significantly affect the annual change in FEV1, but the classification of medical management might be a comprehensive index and reflect the overall severity of respiratory disease (including all respiratory symptoms). This phenomenon may explain why classification of medical management was a significant factor.
Physical and pulmonary function, in general, decline with aging29, 30). Interestingly, as classification of medical management and/or respiratory symptoms became more severe, the decline in FEV1 became less in the present study. In the Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT) study, patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) showed smaller declines in FEV1 than those with less severe COPD31). Another study reported that the annual change in FEV1 was less in patients with advanced stages of COPD32). In general, more treatments (e.g., bronchodilators or other medication) are administered as disease severity increases. As a result, the decline in FEV1 might become smaller. This phenomenon may explain why the annual decline in FEV1 becomes smaller with lower %FEV1 (Fig. 3).
Another factor that could be associated with the annual change in FEV1 is the age of subjects. In the present study, the mean age of subjects was 68.8 years in the year 2000. In contrast, the mean age of subjects in studies that examined longitudinal changes in pulmonary function ranged from 20 years to 60 years20, 33, 34). The slope of the prediction equation in those studies was steeper than that in the present study. However, in studies that involved older subjects, the slope of the prediction equation was less pronounced35, 36). The annual change in FEV1, in general, declined with age. However, the decline may be slowed at an advanced age and then the impact of aging may be slight. Moreover, height was not selected by multiple regression analyses, and is a factor that may also be influenced by aging. However, the most important factor affecting pulmonary function and the decline of FEV1 was smoking18, 19). The impact of the factors affecting FEV1 might, therefore, be affected by disease progression or aging. Further investigations are required for clarification of this question.
The present study was limited by the fact that it was retrospective and that some information pertaining to participants was incomplete. For example, details regarding the amount of tobacco smoked by subjects were not available. Furthermore, detailed data pertaining to the medications taken by participants was lacking. The type and dose of medication (e.g., bronchodilators or other treatments) was also not clear.
The findings of our study suggest that smoking is the strongest factor affecting the annual change in FEV1 in officially acknowledged victims with pollution-related illnesses who now live in environments with improved air conditions. In this population, current smokers showed a more rapid decline in FEV1 than former smokers or non-smokers. In some Asian countries in which air pollution is a serious problem, interventions are required to improve the environment and to reduce the prevalence of smoking to improve the health of citizens.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan and Mizushima Kyodo Hospital. Authors are indebted to the staff and co-workers, but especially to the people who participated in this study. We greatly appreciate the help of Sue Jenkins (School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia) in reviewing this manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.D’Amato G, Liccardi G, D’Amato M, et al. : Outdoor air pollution, climatic changes and allergic bronchial asthma. Eur Respir J, 2002, 20: 763–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kelly FJ, Fussell JC: Air pollution and airway disease. Clin Exp Allergy, 2011, 41: 1059–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Griffith KA, Sherrill DL, Siegel EM, et al. : Predictors of loss of lung function in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001, 163: 61–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Babb TG, Rodarte JR: Mechanism of reduced maximal expiratory flow with aging. J Appl Physiol 1985, 2000, 89: 505–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ruivo S, Viana P, Martins C, et al. : Effects of aging on lung function. A comparison of lung function in healthy adults and the elderly. Rev Port Pneumol, 2009, 15: 629–653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee PN, Fry JS: Systematic review of the evidence relating FEV1 decline to giving up smoking. BMC Med, 2010, 8: 84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gorai AK, Tuluri F, Tchounwou PB: A GIS based approach for assessing the association between air pollution and asthma in New York State, USA. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2014, 11: 4845–4869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nieminen P, Panychev D, Lyalyushkin S, et al. : Environmental exposure as an independent risk factor of chronic bronchitis in northwest Russia. Int J Circumpolar Health, 2013, 72: 72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Faruqi S, Wilmot R, Wright C, et al. : Serum LDH in chronic cough: a potential marker of airway inflammation. Clin Respir J, 2012, 6: 81–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maeda K, Nitta H: Environmental health. J Epidemiol, 1996, 6: S121–S124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maeda K: Problems in implication of epidemiology submitted as evidence to the court of air pollution health damages trials. J Epidemiol, 2001, 11: 276–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tanaka T, Asai M, Yanagita Y, et al. : Longitudinal study of respiratory function and symptoms in a non-smoking group of long-term officially-acknowledged victims of pollution-related illness. BMC Public Health, 2013, 13: 766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yanagita Y, Senjyu H, Asai M, et al. : Air pollution irreversibly impairs lung function: a twenty-year follow-up of officially acknowledged victims in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2013, 230: 177–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Flouris AD, Koutedakis Y: Immediate and short-term consequences of secondhand smoke exposure on the respiratory system. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2011, 17: 110–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.He F, Shaffer ML, Rodriguez-Colon S, et al. : Acute effects of fine particulate air pollution on ST segment height: a longitudinal study. Environ Health, 2010, 9: 68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Steinvil A, Fireman E, Kordova-Biezuner L, et al. : Environmental air pollution has decremental effects on pulmonary function test parameters up to one week after exposure. Am J Med Sci, 2009, 338: 273–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tanaka T, Miyamoto N, Kozu R, et al. : Physical function traits of long-term officially acknowledged victims of pollution-related illnesses compared with elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 1605–1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Baldwin ED, Cournand A, Richards DW, Jr: Pulmonary insufficiency; physiological classification, clinical methods of analysis, standard values in normal subjects. Medicine (Baltimore), 1948, 27: 243–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Berglund E, Birath G, Bjure J, et al. : Spirometric studies in normal subjects. I. Forced expirograms in subjects between 7 and 70 years of age. Acta Med Scand, 1963, 173: 185–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Olafsdóttir IS, Gíslason T, Thjódleifsson B, et al. : Gender differences in the association between C-reactive protein, lung function impairment, and COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2007, 2: 635–642. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schnabel E, Chen CM, Koch B, et al. KORA (Cooperative Research in the Region of Augsburg) study group: Regional differences in prediction models of lung function in Germany. Respir Res, 2010, 11: 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Anthonisen NR, Connett JE, Kiley JP, et al. : Effects of smoking intervention and the use of an inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator on the rate of decline of FEV1. The Lung Health Study. JAMA, 1994, 272: 1497–1505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yokoyama T, Mitsulfuji M: Statistical representation of the ventilatory capacity of 2,247 healthy Japanese adults. Chest, 1972, 61: 655–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Japan Respiratory Society coPP.: Japanese clinical pulmonary function test standard value: the healthy person pumonary function test in 14 area Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi, 1993 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nakadate T: [Age-related decline in forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity based on a longitudinal observation of Japanese males]. Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi, 1997, 35: 954–959. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sherman CB, Xu X, Speizer FE, et al. : Longitudinal lung function decline in subjects with respiratory symptoms. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1992, 146: 855–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lindberg A, Larsson LG, Rönmark E, et al. : Decline in FEV1 in relation to incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a cohort with respiratory symptoms. COPD, 2007, 4: 5–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jedrychowski W, Krzyzanowski M, Wysocki M: Are chronic wheezing and asthma-like attacks related to FEV1 decline? The Cracow Study. Eur J Epidemiol, 1988, 4: 335–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsubaki A, Kubo M, Kobayashi R, et al. : Age-related changes in physical function in community-dwelling people aged 50–79 years. J Phys Ther Sci, 2010, 22: 23–27. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abe T, Suzuki T, Yoshida H, et al. : The relationship between pulmonary function and physical function and mobility in community-dwelling elderly women aged 75 years or older. J Phys Ther Sci, 2011, 23: 443–449. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tashkin DP, Celli B, Senn S, et al. UPLIFT Study Investigators: A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359: 1543–1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Casanova C, Cote CG, Marin JM, et al. : The 6-min walking distance: long-term follow up in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J, 2007, 29: 535–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Paoletti P, Pistelli G, Fazzi P, et al. : Reference values for vital capacity and flow-volume curves from a general population study. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir, 1986, 22: 451–459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Society AT: Standardization of Spirometory. 1979: 831–838.
- 35.Enright PL, Kronmal RA, Higgins M, et al. : Spirometry reference values for women and men 65 to 85 years of age. Cardiovascular health study. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1993, 147: 125–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sharp DS, Enright PL, Chiu D, et al. : Reference values for pulmonary function tests of Japanese-American men aged 71 to 90 years. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1996, 153: 805–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



