The authors wish to make the following corrections to their paper published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [1]:
Page 1939, 4 lines from the bottom of the page, the sentence: “The number of participants scoring “moderate” or “severe” depression decreased from 52% (divided into: moderate 29% and severe 33%) at start of NBR to 26% (divided into: moderate 22% and severe 4%) at six-month follow-up, and had decreased further to 21% at twelve-month follow-up (divided into: moderate 17% and severe 4%) (Figure 5)” should read: “The number of participants scoring “moderate” or “severe” depression decreased from 62% (divided into: moderate 33% and severe 29%) at start of NBR to 26% (divided into: moderate 22% and severe 4%) at six-month follow-up, and had decreased further to 21% at twelve-month follow-up (divided into: moderate 17% and severe 4%) (Figure 5)”.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to readers by these changes.
Reference
- 1.Sahlin E., Ahlborg G., Jr., Tenenbaum A., Grahn P. Using nature-based rehabilitation to restart a stalled process of rehabilitation in individuals with stress-related mental illness. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12:1928–1959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120201928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
