Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Electrocardiol. 2015 May 8;48(4):669–671. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.05.008

Construction of Intracardiac Vectorcardiogram from Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Intracardiac Electrograms

Elyar Ghafoori 1, Muammar M Kabir 1, Jian Cao 2, Alexei Shvilkin 3, Larisa G Tereshchenko 1
PMCID: PMC4484311  NIHMSID: NIHMS689156  PMID: 25987408

Abstract

We constructed an intracardiac vectorcardiogram from 3 configurations of intracardiac cardiovertor defibrilator (ICD) electrograms (EGMs). Six distinctive 3 Lead combination were selected out of five leads: Can to right ventricular coil (RVC); RVC to superior vena cava coil (SVC); Atrial lead tip (A-tip) to right ventricular (RV)-ring; Can to RV-ring; RV-tip to RVC, in a patient with dual chamber ICD. Surface spatial QRS-T angle (119.8°) was similar to intracardiac spatial QRS-T angle derived from ICD EGMs combination A (101.3°), B (96.1°), C (92.8°), D (95.2), E (99.0), F (96.2) and median (101.5). Future validation of the novel method is needed.

Keywords: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Vectorcardiography, Intracardiac electrogram

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-689156-f0001.jpg


The implantable cardiovertor defibrillator (ICD) is a life-saving device. Analysis of intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) is a vital part of ICD function [1-4]. Vectorcardiogram (VCG) characterizes movement of the heart vector over the cardiac cycle and was proven to be more informative than projection of the heart vector on a limited number of leads axes. We developed a novel method to construct and analyze intracardiac VCG (iVCG) from ICD EGMs.

ICD EGMs and surface 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded simultaneously, for a 30 second duration, in a patient with an implanted dual chamber ICD (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN)[5]. Recording was performed in intrinsic sinus rhythm and AAI pacing mode immediately after device implantation. This recording was then repeated after 1 week of verified atrial and ventricular pacing in DDD mode with a short AV delay to achieve complete ventricular capture from the device. All the recordings were performed supine. ICD EGMs and surface ECG were digitized respectively with sampling rates of 256 Hz and 500 Hz. Bi-plane X-ray images were obtained after ICD implantation. Patient data were collected at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC). The novel iVCG reconstruction method was developed, and data analysis was performed at the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU).

Inverse Dower transform was applied to acquire orthogonal XYZ ECG from 12 lead ECG recordings. Respiration effects were removed by moving, rotating, and rescaling VCG [6]. Median beat was analyzed. Beats were aligned by the QRS onset. The following ICD EGMs were available for analysis: (1) Can to right ventricular coil (RVC); (2) RVC to superior vena cava coil (SVC); (3) Atrial lead tip (A-tip) to right ventricular (RV)-ring; (4) Can to RV-ring; (5) RV-tip to RVC; (6) RV-tip to RV-ring. Near field EGM RV-tip to RV-ring was excluded from the study due to its low resolution volume[7], while the remaining 5 EGMs were used to construct three different configurations of three-dimensional (but not orthogonal) coordinates: : A) Can to RVC, A-tip to RV-ring and RV-tip to RVC. B) Can to RVC, Can to RV-ring and RV-tip to RVC. C) RVC to SV, A-tip to RV-ring and RV-tip to RVC (D) A-tip to RV-ring, Can to RV-ring and RV-tip to RVC, (E) Can to RVC, RVC to SVC and RV-tip to RVC, (F) RVC to SVC, Can to RV-ring and RV-tip to RVC. ICD leads were located using the bi-plane X-ray images (Figure 1). The lead locations were used to acquire the EGM signal vectors used to orthogonalize the EGMs as following:

V1=(VBVA)VBVA,V2=V1×(VAVC)V1×(VAVC),V3=V3×V1 (1-3)
SXO=SAV1,SYO=SBV2,SZO=SCV3 (4-6)

where VA, VB and VC are the vectors representing direction for signals SA, SB and SC: Subsequently, SXO, SYO and SZO are orthogonalized EGMs, resulted from SA, SB, and SC, which were further used to reconstruct iVCGs. Finally, the median was taken from entire 6 employed combinations’ orthogonal signals. The median iVCG was reconstructed. Median iVCG hold the closest morphological representation to VCG (Figure 2).

Figure1.

Figure1

Localization of ICD leads and EGMs’ vectors using biplane X-ray images. AP = anteroposterior, L = Lateral.

Figure2.

Figure2

Surface 12-lead ECG, and median beat intracardiac EGMs in AAI pacing mode. Constructed surface VCG and Median-intracardiac-VCG.

Due to the presence of asymmetrical QRS and T loops on iVCGs and lower sampling frequency on ICD EGMs the mean (but not “peak”) spatial QRS-T angle was measured as previously described [8]. The spatial T peak vector magnitude was measured [9].

Intracardiac spatial QRS-T angle was largely in agreement with surface QRS-T angle and did not change after 1 week of pacing (Table 1). T vector magnitude increased after 1 week of pacing, which is likely a manifestation of cardiac memory [5]. Post-myocardial infarction inferior scar was presented on iVCG as a prominent sharp and rapid change in direction of middle to late part of QRS loop and was more easily seen on iVCG, as compared to surface VCG (Figure 2). The results were highly consistent for both QRS-T angle and T vector magnitude through different EGMs combinations. Further studies are needed to validate the method presented here. Future potential applications of the method include: improvement in rhythm discrimination (supraventricular vs. ventricular arrhythmias), prediction of ventricular arrhythmias, detection of acute ischemia, and detection of acute/intermittent ventricular conduction abnormalities.

Table1.

Comparison of surface VCG and iVCG parameters

Spatial QRS-T angle, ° Spatial T vector amplitude, mV Spatial
QRS-T
Angle

Baseline Day 7 Baseline Day 7

ISR AAI ISR AAI ISR AAI IRS AAI Average
sVCG 118.3 122.9 117.2 120.9 0.27 0.30 0.27 0.30 119.8
iVCG A 99.2 103.2 105.2 97.8 1.6 1.6 4.0 3.9 101.3
iVCG B 102.0 99.1 92.3 91.0 1.8 1.7 4.2 3.9 96.1
iVCG C 86.9 110.2 87.5 86.5 1.6 1.6 4.1 4.1 92.8
iVCG D 89.1 105.9 90.1 95.6 1.5 1.5 4.4 4.4 95.2
iVCG E 88.6 108.6 95.4 103.2 1.5 1.3 3.9 3.9 99.0
iVCG F 89.1 93.81 90.0 111.7 1.5 1.4 4.0 3.5 96.2
iVCG M 99.0 92.6 99.2 115.3 0.8 0.7 2.9 2.8 101.5

sVCG=surface VCG. iVCG A= intracardiac VCG A: Can to RVC, A-tip to RV-ring, RV-tip to RVC. iVCG B: Can to RVC, Can to RV-ring, RV-tip to RVC. iVCG C: RVC to SVC, A-tip to RV-ring, RV-tip to RVC. iVCG D: A-tip to RV-ring, Can to RV-ring, RV-tip to RVC. iVCG E: Can to RVC, RVC to SVC, RV-tip to RVC. iVCG F: RVC to SVC, Can to RV-ring, RV-tip to RVC. iVCG M= Median iVCG. ISR=intrinsic sinus rhythm

Highlights.

  • Intracardiac VCG was constructed out of intracardiac EGMs

  • Intracardiac QRS-T angle was similar to the surface VCG QRS-T angle

  • Intracardiac QRS-T angle in several configurations of intracardiac EGMs was similar

Acknowledgments

Funding Sources: This research was supported in part by the National Institute of Health #1R01HL118277 (LGT).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: none

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Tereshchenko LG, et al. Transient local injury current in right ventricular electrogram after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock predicts heart failure progression. J Am Coll.Cardiol. 2009;54(9):822–828. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tereshchenko LG, et al. Prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias by intracardiac repolarization variability analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(3):276–84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.829440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tereshchenko LG, et al. Intracardiac QT integral on far-field ICD electrogram predicts sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD patients. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(12):1889–1894. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tereshchenko LG, et al. Intracardiac J-point elevation before the onset of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(10):1594–1602. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shvilkin A, et al. Vectorcardiographic determinants of cardiac memory during normal ventricular activation and continuous ventricular pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(7):943–948. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Waks JW, et al. Beat-to-Beat Spatiotemporal Variability in the T Vector Is Associated With Sudden Cardiac Death in Participants Without Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(1) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Requena-Carrion J, et al. Sensitivity and Spatial Resolution of Transvenous Leads in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 2009;56(12):2773–2781. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2027425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oehler A, et al. QRS-T Angle: A Review. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2014;19(6):534–42. doi: 10.1111/anec.12206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sur S, Han L, Tereshchenko LG. Comparison of sum absolute QRST integral, and temporal variability in depolarization and repolarization, measured by dynamic vectorcardiography approach, in healthy men and women. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES