Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2015 Aug 1;10:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2015.04.003

Genomics of the honey bee microbiome

Nancy A Moran 1
PMCID: PMC4484875  NIHMSID: NIHMS683417  PMID: 26140264

Abstract

The guts of honey bee workers contain a distinctive community of bacterial species. They are microaerophilic or anaerobic, and were not clearly deliniated by earlier studies relying on laboratory culture of isolates under atmospheric oxygen levels. Recently, a more complete picture of the potential metabolism and functions of these bacteria has been possible, using genomic approaches based on metagenomic samples, as well as cultured isolates. Of these, most are host-restricted and are generally absent outside adult guts. These species include both Gram negative groups, such as Gilliamella apicola and Snodgrassella alvi, and Gram positive groups such as certain Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species. These gut bacterial species appear to have undergone long term coevolution with honey bee and, in some cases, bumble bee hosts. Prediction of gene functions from genome sequences suggests roles in nutrition, digestion, and potentially in defense against pathogens. In particular, genes for sugar utilization and carbohydrate breakdown are enriched in G. apicola and the Lactobacillus species.

Introduction

The importance of gut-dwelling microbial communities in the health of animals, from humans to insects, has become widely appreciated only recently [1]. A key reason is that tools for studying microorganisms in non-laboratory environments have become much more powerful. Because most organisms in most environments, including guts, are not readily grown in laboratory culture, traditional culture-based methods gave an incomplete and often extremely misleading picture of microbial communities. Approaches based on DNA sequencing have enabled a more reliable picture, and the growth of nucleotide sequence databases has enabled routine classification of gut microorganisms characterized only by short fragments of sequenced DNA.

These new methods have revolutionized understanding of microbial ecology in general. They have now been applied to gut communities in honey bees (Apis mellifera), and have yielded insights into the dynamics of these distinctive communities and into potential effects of gut bacteria on bee hosts. Below, I summarize recent findings about the honey bee gut microbiota, mostly based on genomic methods.

Who are they?

Starting in 2003 with a study on honey bee workers from North America and South Africa ([2], several novel rRNA gene sequences were obtained, pointing to the occurrence of characteristic bacteria in the guts of this species. Later, more intensive sequencing repeatedly retrieved these same distinctive sequences and a few others from honey bee workers from samples in Europe, North America, and Australia ([36]. It became clear that honey bee guts harbor a specific set of bacterial species not retrieved from other environments. The guts of bumble bees (Bombus species) contain bacteria that are closely related to some of the honey bee associates [7] and that are classified as the same bacterial species [8]. These same distinctive groups are also found in other Apis species [911]. In contrast, bees outside of Apis and Bombus, whether solitary or social, usually lack these bacterial species [5,7,12,13]. The exceptions are certain eusocial stingless bees (Meliponini) in Australia which share some of the Lactobacillus clusters with honey bees [14].

Approximately eight bacterial species clusters dominate in the guts of A. mellifera workers (Table 1), making up over 95% of the bacteria in most individuals ([10,15]. Each such cluster corresponds to a set of closely related bacterial strains. Because species designations are somewhat arbitrary within bacteria, some of these clusters are described as a single species, while others are described as multiple species. Three are newly described as species within the Gram negative bacterial phylum Proteobacteria; these are Snodgrassella alvi, Gilliamella apicola, and Frischella perrara [8,16], all restricted to the guts of Apis species and Bombus species, with F. perrara confined to honey bees. Strains within each of these three species show <3% sequence variation within the 16S rRNA gene but much more extensive divergence in their overall genomes, implying differences in metabolic capabilities [17,18]. Three similarly closely related clusters of Gram positive bacteria are also largely restricted to bee guts; these include two clusters within the Firmicutes phylum and specifically within the genus Lactobacillus, and one Bifidobacterium cluster within the phylum Actinobacteria. These have been called F-4, F-5 (or Firm4 and Firm5) and “Bifido” [35]. Within the two “Firm” clusters, strains have been given multiple species names within Lactobacillus [19]; likewise “Bifido” corresponds to a species cluster that includes Bifidobacterium asteroides from honey bee [20] and several species described from bumble bees [2123] (Table 1). Two other species clusters are from distantly related clusters of Alphaproteobacteria, initially called Alpha1 and Alpha2 [4]. Alpha1 is a close relative of Bartonella species, a group of specialized animal pathogens within the Rhizobiales, and is present and often abundant in about half of sampled workers [15]. Alpha2 consists of numerous strains of Acetobacteraceae, including Alpha2.1, which is a gut specialist, and Alpha 2.2 (Parasaccharibacter apium) [24]. Among members of the typical honey bee gut community, only the Alpha 2.2 group, within Acetobacteraceae, appears to grow commonly in environments outside of bee guts. Closely related strains to Alpha2.2 are found in floral nectar, bee bread, and honey as well as both adult and larval guts [25].

Table 1.

Major bacterial species or species clusters associated with honey bees. The first 8 are the dominant clusters in the adult hind gut. See text for citations.

Species or species cluster Other designations Bacteria phylum or
division
Primary locations Host species
Gilliamella apicola Gamma1, older sequences
labeled “Pasteurellaceae” or
“Serratia” erroneously
Gammaproteobacteria Adult midgut, hindgut (ileum
lumen)
Apis and Bombus species
Frischella perrara Gamma2 Gammaproteobacteria Adult hindgut (proventriculus,
ileum)
Apis mellifera
Snodgrassella alvi Beta Betaproteobacteria Adult hindgut (ileum wall) Apis and Bombus species
Lactobacillus mellis, L. mellifer Firm4 Firmicutes Adult hindgut (rectum) Apis and Bombus species
Lactobacillus helsingborgensis,
L. melliventris, L. kimbladii
Firm5 Firmicutes Adult hindgut (ileum, rectum) Apis and Bombus species
Bifidobacterium asteroides, B.
actinocoloniiforme, B.
bohemicum
Bifido Actinomycetes Adult hindgut (rectum) Apis and Bombus species
Alpha1 Bartonellaceae
(Rhizobiales)
Alphaproteobacteria Adult gut, variably present Apis mellifera
Parasaccharibacter apium Alpha2, Acetobacteraceae Alphaproteobacteria Larval gut, adult crop, nectar,
honey, hive, some in adult hindgut
Apis and Bombus species
Lactobacillus kunkeei Fructophilic lactic acid
bacteria
Firmicutes Larval gut, adult crop, nectar,
honey, hive, absent from adult hindgut
Apis and Bombus species

Several other bacteria have been found at low abundance in some honey bee guts. These include a specific cluster from Bacteroidetes [4,15] that has been retrieved from both European and American honey bee workers and from some bumble bees, but that is usually absent or at low abundance (<1%). In addition, several species of Enterobacteraceae that are related to common insect pathogens are commonly present in low numbers (<0.1%), occasionally reaching higher frequencies in individual bees [15,26].

Where are they?

The honey bee adult worker harbors a large bacterial community in the gut, with roughly 1 billion bacterial cells in a mature worker [27,28]. Of these bacteria, ~95% are in the hindgut. The crop (honey stomach or foregut) contains bacteria [29], but studies that quantify cell numbers have shown that crop populations are very small [25,28]. The crop community is dominated by Lactobacillus kunkeei, other environmental Lactobacillus, and Acetobacteraceae (Alpha 2.2), taxa also present in the hive and in food, including nectar, dilute honey and beebread [30]. Thus, the crop does not seem to harbor a specifically crop-adapted microbiota [25]. The midgut also contains relatively few bacteria, with most concentrated at the distal proventriculus region, adjoining the hindgut [28].

The hindgut is divided into two compartments, the anterior ileum, a narrow tube with six longitudinal invaginations, and the rectum, a larger, sac-like compartment; each regions contains a characteristic community (Fig. 1). The three main proteobacterial species, G. apicola, F. perrara, and S. alvi dominate in the ileum, forming a dense biofilm beginning at the junction with the Malphighian tubules and continuing along the length of the ileum wall [27,28]. S. alvi forms a layer directly on the cuticle lining the gut, and G. apicola is towards the lumen. Firm-5 is also present as small clusters in the lumen. F. perrara is typically less abundant and occasionally entirely absent, but often dominates ileum communities around day 8 of adult life, corresponding to the nurse stage [27]. The three dominant Gram-positives (Firm4, Firm5 and Bifido) dominate in the rectum, which contains a large bacterial community [27,28].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Major components of the honey bee microbiota and their locations in the bee gut or in the hive.

For adult worker guts, RNA and DNA samples give similar pictures of community composition, based on 16S rRNA amplicons, indicating that these bacteria are alive and replicating within bee guts [15]. Likewise, metagenomic studies based on random sequencing of non-amplified DNA or RNA from guts indicate a similar taxonomic composition [31,32]. All of these studies point to a characteristic bacterial community that has evolved to specialize upon the honey bee adult gut as its sole ecological niche.

Although these specialized bacteria were first detected by non-culture based sequencing approaches, each of the species has since been successfully cultured in the laboratory [8,16,19,24, 33]. In general, they grow on rich media, consistent with their host-associated lifestyle, and require anaerobic or microaerophilic conditions, that is, consistent with the likely lowered oxygen availability within the gut lumen, although some strains appear to grow at atmospheric oxygen levels [25]. Interestingly the Bifidobacterium asteroides present in honey bee guts retains capacity for aerobic respiration, unlike Bifidobacterium from mammalian guts, which are entirely anaerobic [20], reflecting the likelihood of higher oxygen concentrations in bee guts compared to mammalian guts. Culturing the bacteria enables full characterization of individual strains and facilitates progress in understanding the roles of the bacteria in bee health.

How are they acquired?

The characteristic gut bacteria in adult guts colonize during the first few days following emergence from the pupal stage [27]. When quantified, numbers of bacteria in larvae are small [28] and consist primarily of environmental Acetobacteraceae (Alpha2.2) and Lactobacillus [34]. Since these groups are also present in nectar and pollen, their presence in larvae may represent ingested bacteria present in the food, as suggested by phylogenetic analyses of strains from different sources [25]. Immediately following eclosure, adults lack gut bacteria. If pupae are removed from the hive and allowed to eclose within a clean dish in the laboratory, workers will remain nearly germ-free throughout adult life and will lack the typical gut bacterial species [27]. Colonization occurs through contact of newly eclosed adults with nurse bees and with the hive environment. Oral trophallaxis alone is insufficient for normal community establishment, whereas exposure to live nurses or hindgut contents results in typical communities [27]. Thus, at least some gut species, including those dominating in the ileum (G. apicola, S. alvi, F. perrara), are transmitted via a fecal-oral route. Adults that emerge in isolation in the lab can be experimentally colonized with known bacterial strains to determine effects on hosts [27].

The worker gut community reaches its typical composition 3–5 days after eclosure [27] and does not change appreciably when workers shift from within-hive activities to foraging [30]. Thus the adult gut seems to have a stable and distinct community that is not found elsewhere. Other bacteria are present in hive components, and these include a diversity of taxa such as L kunkeei and Acetobacteraceae strains, [35,36]. These organisms occur in stored nectar and beebread, where they appear to have a role in preserving but not in fermenting or digesting these stored products [35].

What are they doing?

A metagenomic study of the worker gut community [31] contained an excess of carbohydrate-processing genes, particularly in strains of G. apicola. Pectate lyase, which can digest pectin present in cell walls of pollen grains, was present and functional in some strains of G. apicola, while absent in others. This indicates strain diversity in ability to use different dietary components, suggesting that the particular set of strains present in individual workers or in colonies might affect nutritional ecology of the bees or might act to neutralize dietary toxins. A study based on sequencing RNA from gut communities verified an excess of carbohydrate-processing genes actively expressed in the bee gut [32]. Sequencing DNA from single bacterial cells from worker guts also indicated that G. apicola shows a striking enrichment for carbohydrate-processing genes and that gene sets in this functional category were highly variable among strains [18].

Complete genome sequencing of cultured isolates of G. apicola and S. alvi shows that these two species have highly complementary metabolic capabilities [17]. Whereas G. apicola strains contain a large number of sugar transporters and sugar utilization pathways, S. alvi cannot use sugar as a carbon source and instead must use carboxylates produced as downstream products of sugar metabolism. This metabolic complementarity was found in all strains of G. apicola and S. alvi, suggesting a long coevolution as metabolic partners within the bee gut. In both G. apicola and S. alvi, individual isolates can vary in the presence of hundreds of genes despite near-identity of 16S rRNA sequences [17]. Interestingly, the G. apicola strains from honey bee contain far more genes for use of carbohydrates including diverse sugars than did the bumble bee-associated strains [17,18], consistent with the expanded role of nectar-processing and honey in the ecology and nutrition of honey bees. The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species also likely play a central function in carbohydrate catabolism and thus in nutrition of their hosts [32].

Another potential role for the gut community is protection against parasites and pathogens. Genomic analyses have revealed many genes that produce toxins, potentially affecting bee parasites [17,37]. The related gut bacteria in bumble bees have been shown to protect against infection by the trypanosomatid parasite Crithidia bombi [38], and variation in the gut microbiota underlies most observed variation in resistance to particular strains of C. bombi [39]. Community analyses of gut microbiota in three species of wild bumble bees in eastern North America revealed higher Crithidia incidence in individuals with low colonization by the core gut bacterial species S. alvi and G. apicola, consistent with a protective role by one or both of these bacterial species [40]. Honey bees also can be parasitized by Crithidia species as well as by other parasites and pathogens. Some other bacterial symbionts of insects are known to lower infection rates by RNA viral pathogens of the hosts [41]. Thus, honey bee gut bacteria plausibly can affect ability to limit proliferation of important bee diseases such as Deformed Wing Virus. Whether the characteristic gut bacteria play a role in resistance to these remains to be tested.

Some strains of bacteria associated with honey bees or bumble bees have antimicrobial properties, suggesting the possibility of inhibition of potential pathogens [21,4246].

Probably gut communities are largely beneficial to their hosts, but this is rarely shown directly, even for well-studied mammalian systems. For bees, gut bacteria cannot be assumed to be entirely beneficial; possibly they confer a mixture of benefits and costs. For example, some strains of Escherichia coli in human guts contain a large locus (~50 kilobases) encoding a hybrid nonribosomal peptide-polyketide synthase pathway for production of a molecule called colibactin, which is implicated as a cause of colorectal cancer and tumors. Curiously, F. perrara, which is restricted to the honey bee gut ileum, encodes a closely homologous locus that produces a similar molecule, which has the same cytotoxic effects in cell cultures [37]. The role of F. perrara and colibactin in honey bees is unknown, but one possibility is that F. perrara may have negative consequences for hosts, despite being found in guts of most workers.

Among genes that vary in presence among strains of G. apicola and S. alvi, some are likely involved in inter-strain competition. For example, S. alvi strains contain Type 6 Secretion Systems, mechanisms for delivering anti-bacterial toxins to other bacteria; the effectors are among the most variable genes sets in S. alvi [17,18].

Diversity-Good or bad?

Although it is commonly believed that a diverse microbiota is a good microbiota [47], evidence for this is limited. In bees, species-level diversity is low, while strain diversity is high; however, whether more diversity is good or bad for hosts has not been experimentally addressed. Potentially strain diversity provides more metabolic functions that benefit hosts; for example, G. apicola strains vary in ability to use particular sugars or other carbohydrates [17,37]. Some minor species that are erratically present are closely related to insect pathogens, such as Serratia marcescens and Hafnia alvi; these may represent opportunistic pathogens that can dominate if the typical gut community is compromised. For example, in the first few days following emergence and in workers deprived of normal routes of colonization, gut communities consist of erratic mixes of atypical bacteria, including some potential pathogens [15,27]. Likewise, in bumble bees, individual workers sometimes have few of the typical S. alvi and G. apicola gut symbionts, and instead have higher representation of possible enteric pathogens [40].

Implications of the bee microbiome for pollinator management and conservation

Very likely, the gut microbiota confers some benefits to honey bees, as genome sequencing suggests roles in digestion and nutrition, and experiments indicate protective effects in bumble bees. Some strains of bee-associated bacteria have antimicrobial properties, suggesting the possibility of inhibition of potential pathogens [21,4245]. Given this suggestive evidence for a beneficial role of the gut microbiota, interfering with the normal gut community is likely to be detrimental. Long term antibiotic applications to colonies in the United States has resulted in ubiquitous presence of tetracycline resistance loci, present in most of the typical gut bacteria in US honey bees but absent from bees from countries where antibiotics have not been used [48]. Antibiotics lower diversity in the communities in which only some strains have resistance. Speculatively, the Food and Drug Administration approval of use of a novel antibiotic (tylosin) in 2005 played a part in lowering stress tolerance and in the unprecedented colony mortality that occurred in US honey bees during the winter of 2006–2007 [48]. Thus, it would seem prudent to avoid overuse of antibiotics, as this could have detrimental consequences for colony health, just as chronic use of antibiotics might affect human health by continually perturbing resident gut communities

Another possibility is the use of honey bee gut bacteria as probiotics [17] or as agents for delivering gene products to the bee gut [49,50]. Potentially strains that are particularly useful in bolstering colony health under particular environmental or dietary conditions could be introduced to colonies. However, it is not clear that supplementing the typical bacteria already present will improve colony health. Potentially, the strains present in particular colonies have already been selected to perform well under local conditions.

Highlights.

Honey bee adult workers contain characteristic communities of bacteria in their guts.

Eight main species clusters are acquired within hives by new adults and colonize hindguts.

Snodgrassella alvi, Gilliamella apicola, and certain Lactobacillus dominate guts of honey bees and bumble bees.

Crop communities are small and resemble the bacteria present in other parts of the hive.

Genomic approaches point to likely functions of these bacteria.

Acknowledgements

Support for this work was provided by the US NSF (1415604) and the US NIH (RO1GM108477). I thank members of my lab for related discussion and input.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012;148:1258–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jeyaprakash A, Hoy MA, Allsopp MH. Bacterial diversity in worker adults of Apis mellifera capensis and Apis mellifera scutellata (Insecta: Hymenoptera) assessed using 16S rRNA sequences. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2003;84:96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2003.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cox-Foster DL, Conlan S, Holmes EC, Palacios G, Evans JD, Moran NA, Quan P-L, Briese T, Hornig M, Geiser DM, et al. A metagenomic survey of microbes in honey bee colony collapse disorder. Science. 2007;318:283–287. doi: 10.1126/science.1146498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Babendreier D, Joller D, Romeis JR, Bigler F, Widmer F. Bacterial community structures in honeybee intestines and their response to two insecticidal proteins. FEMS microbiology ecology. 2007;59:600–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00249.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Martinson VG, Danforth BN, Minckley RL, Rueppell O, Tingek S, Moran NA. A simple and distinctive microbiota associated with honey bees and bumble bees. Mol. Ecol. 2011;20:619–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04959.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mohr KI, Tebbe CC. Diversity and phylotype consistency of bacteria in the guts of three bee species (Apoidea) at an oilseed rape field. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;8:258–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00893.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Koch H, Abrol DP, Li J, Schmid-Hempel P. Diversity and evolutionary patterns of bacterial gut associates of corbiculate bees. Mol. Ecol. 2013;22:2028–2044. doi: 10.1111/mec.12209.. The authors used a PCR-based approach to analyze the diversity of G. apicola and S. alvi in worldwide collections of a large set of bumble and honey bee species. Results show some phylogenetic congruence between each group of symbionts and their bee hosts, consistent with long term coevolution of corbiculate bees and gut symbionts. However, the congruence was not perfect, suggesting some incidence of interspecies-transfers of symbionts.
  • 8. Kwong WK, Moran NA. Cultivation and characterization of the gut symbionts of honey bees and bumble bees: description of Snodgrassella alvi gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Neisseriaceae of the Betaproteobacteria, and Gilliamella apicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of Orbaceae fam. nov., Orbales ord. nov., a sister taxon to the order “Enterobacteriales” of the Gammaproteobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013;63:2008–2018. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.044875-0.. This paper reports the culture conditions and characterization for distinctive Gram-negative bacterial lineages within honey and bumble bee guts.
  • 9.Saraithong P, Li Y, Saenphet K, Chen Z, Chantawannakul P. Bacterial community structure in Apis florea larvae analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Insect Science. 2014 doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ahn J-H, Hong I-P, Bok J-I, Kim B-Y, Song J, Weon H-Y. Pyrosequencing analysis of the bacterial communities in the guts of honey bees Apis cerana and Apis mellifera in Korea. J Microbiol. 2012;50:735–745. doi: 10.1007/s12275-012-2188-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Disayathanoowat T, Young JPW, Helgason T, Chantawannakul P. T-RFLP analysis of bacterial communities in the midguts of Apis mellifera and Apis cerana honey bees in Thailand. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011;79:273–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. McFrederick QS, Cannone JJ, Gutell RR, Kellner K, Plowes RM, Mueller UG. Specificity between lactobacilli and hymenopteran hosts is the exception rather than the rule. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:1803–1812. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03681-12.. Several species of Lactobacillus are found in bees, but this survey shows that only honey and bumble bees are associated with host-specific groups. Other bees and ants contain Lactobacillus groups that are are indistinguisable from strains found in diverse environments.
  • 13.McFrederick QS, Wcislo WT, Taylor DR, Ishak HD, Dowd SE, Mueller UG. Environment or kin: whence do bees obtain acidophilic bacteria? Mol. Ecol. 2012;21:1754–1768. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leonhardt SD, Kaltenpoth M. Microbial communities of three sympatric Australian stingless bee species. PLoS ONE. 9:e106718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sabree ZL, Hansen AK, Moran NA. Independent studies using deep sequencing resolve the same set of core bacterial species dominating gut communities of honey bees. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e41250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Engel P, Kwong WK, Moran NA. Frischella perrara gen. nov., sp. nov., a gammaproteobacterium isolated from the gut of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013;63:3646–3651. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.049569-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kwong WK, Engel P, Koch H, Moran NA. Genomics and host specialization of honey bee and bumble bee gut symbionts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014;111:11509–11514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405838111.. Analysis of genomes of 3 strains each of G. apicola and S. alvi, from honey and bumble bees, showed that these co-residing bacterial species have divergent and complementary central metabolism. Furthermore, the strains from different bee hosts have different gene sets, that might affect ability to use different sugars and pollen. Experimental results showed that strains in honey bees and bumble bees are able to colonize only their native host.
  • 18. Engel P, Stepanauskas R, Moran NA. Hidden diversity in honey bee gut symbionts detected by single-cell genomics. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004596.. By amplification of single genomes of G. apicola and S. alvi nearly complete genomes were obtained from individual cells, from a single honey bee colony. Even within a colony, each bacterial species shows considerable variation in genome content.
  • 19. Olofsson TC, Alsterfjord M, Nilson B, Butler E, Vasquez A. Lactobacillus apinorum sp. nov., Lactobacillus mellifer sp. nov., Lactobacillus mellis sp. nov., Lactobacillus melliventris sp. nov., Lactobacillus kimbladii sp. nov., Lactobacillus helsingborgensis sp. nov. and Lactobacillus kullabergensis sp. nov., isolated from the honey stomach of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014;64:3109–3119. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059600-0.. This paper characterizes Lactobacillus strains corresponding to the host-restricted gut-dwelling Lactobacillus in honey bees, as well as some that are rare in bee guts and more typical in hive materials.
  • 20.Bottacini F, Milani C, Turroni F, Sánchez B, Foroni E. Bifidobacterium asteroides PRL2011 genome analysis reveals clues for colonization of the insect gut. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e44229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wu M, Sugimura Y, Takaya N, Takamatsu D, Kobayashi M, Taylor D, Yoshiyama M. Characterization of bifidobacteria in the digestive tract of the Japanese honeybee, Apis cerana japonica. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2013;112:88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Killer J, Kopečný J, Mrázek J, Koppová I, Havlík J, Benada O, Kott T. Bifidobacterium actinocoloniiforme sp. nov. and Bifidobacterium bohemicum sp. nov., from the bumblebee digestive tract. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011;61:1315–1321. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.022525-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Killer J, Votavova A, Valterova I. Lactobacillus bombi sp. nov., from the digestive tract of laboratory-reared bumblebee queens (Bombus terrestris) Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014;64:2611–2617. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.063602-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Corby-Harris V, Snyder LA, Schwan MR, Maes P, McFrederick QS, Anderson KE. Origin and effect of Alpha 2.2 Acetobacteraceae in honey bee larvae and description of Parasaccharibacter apium gen. nov., sp. nov. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014;80:7460–7472. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02043-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Anderson KE, Sheehan TH, Mott BM, Maes P, Snyder L, Schwan MR, Walton A, Jones BM, Corby-Harris V. Microbial ecology of the hive and pollination landscape: bacterial associates from floral nectar, the alimentary tract and stored food of honey bees (Apis mellifera) PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e83125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moran NA, Hansen AK, Powell JE, Sabree ZL. Distinctive gut microbiota of honey bees assessed using deep sampling from individual worker bees. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e36393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Powell JE, Martinson VG, Urban-Mead K, Moran NA. Routes of acquisition of the gut microbiota of Apis mellifera. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01861-14.. Experimental tests for different sources of the characteristic communities (hive materials, nurses, hindgut contents indicates that some of the typical community is transferred through a fecal route. Characteristic communities appear stable by day 5 following adult eclosure.
  • 28.Martinson VG, Moy J, Moran NA. Establishment of characteristic gut bacteria during development of the honeybee worker. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:2830–2840. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07810-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olofsson TC, Vásquez A. Detection and identification of a novel lactic acid bacterial flora within the honey stomach of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Curr. Microbiol. 2008;57:356–363. doi: 10.1007/s00284-008-9202-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Corby-Harris V, Maes P, Anderson KE. The bacterial communities associated with honey bee (Apis mellifera) foragers. 2014;9:e95056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095056.. Guts of older foragers contain communities similar to those in younger nurses, despite their very different diets. Some Lactobacillus previously considered as crop associates instead consist of species that are found in the hive (such as L. kunkeei strains) or species that are largely confined to the hindgut.
  • 31.Engel P, Martinson VG, Moran NA. Functional diversity within the simple gut microbiota of the honey bee. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012;109:11002–11007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202970109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lee FJ, Rusch DB, Stewart FJ, Mattila HR, Newton ILG. Saccharide breakdown and fermentation by the honey bee gut microbiome. Environ. Microbiol. 2014 doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12526.. The authors performed metatranscriptomic analysis based on RNA samples from bee guts and found an excess of transcripts associated with processing complex carbohydrates. These are associated primarily with G. apicola, and with Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium groups.
  • 33.Forsgren E, Olofsson TC, Vasquez A, Fries I. Novel lactic acid bacteria inhibiting Paenibacillus larvae in honey bee larvae. Apidologie. 2010;41:99–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vojvodic S, Rehan SM, Anderson KE. Microbial gut diversity of Africanized and European honey bee larval instars. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Anderson KE, Carroll MJ, Sheehan T, Mott BM, Maes P, Corby-Harris V. Hivestored pollen of honey bees: many lines of evidence are consistent with pollen preservation, not nutrient conversion. Mol. Ecol. 2014;23:5904–5917. doi: 10.1111/mec.12966.. Measurements showed a very low density of bacteria in harvested pollen and beebread with numbers declining over time following pollen storage, but with no substantial change in the community composition. Thus, pollen stores do not appear to have specific communities selected for nutrient coversion; instead, food preservation is a likely function.
  • 36. Endo A, Salminen S. Honeybees and beehives are rich sources for fructophilic lactic acid bacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013;36:444–448. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.06.002.. The Lactobacillus found in association with honey bees were shown to have a high performance on fructose. Communities in larvae and the hive environment were dominated by L. kunkeei, in contrast to communities in the adult gut.
  • 37. Engel P, Vizcaino MI, Crawford JM. Gut symbionts from distinct hosts exhibit genotoxic activity via divergent colibactin biosynthetic pathways. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81 doi: 10.1128/AEM.03283-14. (online early).. Surprisingly F. perrara, one of the honey bee-restricted symbionts, produces a complex molecule that interferes with normal division of eukaryotic cells. The role in honey bees is unknown.
  • 38.Koch H, Schmid-Hempel P. Socially transmitted gut microbiota protect bumble bees against an intestinal parasite. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011;108:19288–19292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110474108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koch H, Schmid-Hempel P. Gut microbiota instead of host genotype drive the specificity in the interaction of a natural host-parasite system. Ecol Lett. 2012;15:1095–1103. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Cariveau DP, Elijah Powell J, Koch H, Winfree R, Moran NA. Variation in gut microbial communities and its association with pathogen infection in wild bumble bees (Bombus) ISME J. 2014;8:2369–2379. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.68.. Gut communities in 3 native bumble bee species were found to vary among species and not between habitat types or localities.
  • 41. Martinez J, Longdon B, Bauer S, Chan Y-S, Miller WJ, Bourtzis K, Teixeira L, Jiggins FM. Symbionts commonly provide broad spectrum resistance to viruses in insects: a comparative analysis of Wolbachia strains. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004369. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004369.. This commentary provides an overview of recent evidence that Wolbachia symbionts in insects provide protection against insect viruses, and provides an example of the unexpected roles in pathogen defense played by insect-associated bacteria.
  • 42.Butler È, Alsterfjord M, Olofsson TC, Karlsson C, Malmström J, Vásquez A. Proteins of novel lactic acid bacteria from Apis mellifera mellifera: an insight into the production of known extra-cellular proteins during microbial stress. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:235. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vásquez A, Forsgren E, Fries I, Paxton RJ, Flaberg E, Szekely L, Olofsson TC. Symbionts as major modulators of insect health: lactic acid bacteria and honeybees. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e33188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Evans JD, Armstrong T-N. Antagonistic interactions between honey bee bacterial symbionts and implications for disease. BMC Ecol. 2006;6:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-6-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wu M, Sugimura Y, Iwata K, Takaya N, Takamatsu D, Kobayashi M, Taylor D, Kimura K, Yoshiyama M. Inhibitory effect of gut bacteria from the Japanese honey bee, Apis cerana japonica, against Melissococcus plutonius, the causal agent of European foulbrood disease. J. Insect Sci. 2014;14:129. doi: 10.1093/jis/14.1.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Killer J, Dubná S, Sedláček I, Svec P. Lactobacillus apis sp. nov., from the stomach of honeybees (Apis mellifera), having an in vitro inhibitory effect on the causative agents of American and European foulbrood. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014;64:152–157. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.053033-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Blaser MJ. Missing microbes: how the overuse of antibiotics is fueling our modern plagues. Henry Holt; 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tian B, Fadhil NH, Powell JE, Kwong WK, Moran NA. Long-term exposure to antibiotics has caused accumulation of resistance determinants in the gut microbiota of honeybees. MBio. 2012;3 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00377-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rangberg A, Diep DB, Rudi K, Amdam GV. Paratransgenesis: an approach to improve colony health and molecular insight in honey bees (Apis mellifera)? Integr. Comp. Biol. 2012;52:89–99. doi: 10.1093/icb/ics089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rangberg A, Mathiesen G, Amdam GV, Diep DB. The paratransgenic potential of Lactobacillus kunkeei in the honey bee Apis mellifera. Benef Microbes. 2015 doi: 10.3920/BM2014.0115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES