Table 6. Relationships between family structure and being in the highest total screen time quartile.
Family structure group | Frequency, % (95% CI) | Bivariate analysis, OR (95% CI) | Fully adjusted model,* OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Boys | |||
Traditional | 28.4 (26.3–30.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Reconstituted with irregular visitation | 34.8 (29.6–40.0) | 1.07 (0.88–1.30) | 1.05 (0.86–1.28) |
Reconstituted with regular visitation | 29.2 (21.8–36.7) | 0.83 (0.62–1.12) | 0.85 (0.63–1.15) |
Single parent with irregular visitation | 37.8 (34.2–41.3) | 1.22 (1.04–1.44) | 1.15 (0.98–1.36) |
Single parent with regular visitation | 36.4 (29.3–43.5) | 1.15 (0.90–1.47) | 1.19 (0.92–1.52) |
Girls | |||
Traditional | 21.6 (19.8–23.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Reconstituted with irregular visitation | 24.0 (19.8–28.1) | 0.96 (0.81–1.15) | 0.93 (0.78–1.11) |
Reconstituted with regular visitation | 26.7 (20.5–32.9) | 1.11 (0.86–1.43) | 1.19 (0.91–1.54) |
Single parent with irregular visitation | 27.7 (24.6–30.8) | 1.17 (1.00–1.36) | 1.08 (0.93–1.27) |
Single parent with regular visitation | 23.7 (18.2–29.3) | 0.95 (0.74–1.22) | 0.96 (0.75–1.23) |
Notes.
All analyses account for sample weights and clustering. Statistically significant odds ratios are shown in bold.
Adjusted for the following covariates: grade, immigration, siblings, ethnicity, and family wealth.