Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 25;3:e1048. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1048

Table 6. Relationships between family structure and being in the highest total screen time quartile.

Family structure group Frequency, % (95% CI) Bivariate analysis, OR (95% CI) Fully adjusted model,* OR (95% CI)
Boys
Traditional 28.4 (26.3–30.6) 1.00 1.00
Reconstituted with irregular visitation 34.8 (29.6–40.0) 1.07 (0.88–1.30) 1.05 (0.86–1.28)
Reconstituted with regular visitation 29.2 (21.8–36.7) 0.83 (0.62–1.12) 0.85 (0.63–1.15)
Single parent with irregular visitation 37.8 (34.2–41.3) 1.22 (1.04–1.44) 1.15 (0.98–1.36)
Single parent with regular visitation 36.4 (29.3–43.5) 1.15 (0.90–1.47) 1.19 (0.92–1.52)
Girls
Traditional 21.6 (19.8–23.4) 1.00 1.00
Reconstituted with irregular visitation 24.0 (19.8–28.1) 0.96 (0.81–1.15) 0.93 (0.78–1.11)
Reconstituted with regular visitation 26.7 (20.5–32.9) 1.11 (0.86–1.43) 1.19 (0.91–1.54)
Single parent with irregular visitation 27.7 (24.6–30.8) 1.17 (1.00–1.36) 1.08 (0.93–1.27)
Single parent with regular visitation 23.7 (18.2–29.3) 0.95 (0.74–1.22) 0.96 (0.75–1.23)

Notes.

All analyses account for sample weights and clustering. Statistically significant odds ratios are shown in bold.

*

Adjusted for the following covariates: grade, immigration, siblings, ethnicity, and family wealth.