Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2015 Apr 15;167(1):196–198.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.03.037

Use of Cough and Cold Medications in Severe Bronchiolitis Before and After a Health Advisory Warning against Their Use

Katherine O’Donnell 1, Jonathan M Mansbach 1, Frank LoVecchio 1, John Cheng 1, Pedro A Piedra 1, Sunday Clark 1, Ashley F Sullivan 1, Carlos A Camargo Jr 1, on behalf of the MARC-25 and MARC-30 investigators
PMCID: PMC4485973  NIHMSID: NIHMS674672  PMID: 25888349

Abstract

We compared the use of cough and cold medications in two multicenter studies of young children hospitalized with bronchiolitis before and after the 2008 Food and Drug Administration cough and cold medications advisory. Although cough and cold medications use decreased after the advisory, nearly 20% of children age 12–23.9 months with severe bronchiolitis received cough and cold medications.

Keywords: Bronchiolitis, cough and cold medications, FDA Advisory


Following the October 2007 voluntary withdrawal of “infant” cough and cold medicine formulations by the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a health advisory in January 2008 warning against the use of cough and cold medications in children age <2 years, citing both lack of efficacy and “potentially life-threatening side effects.” [1] Subsequently, there has been a decrease in emergency department (ED) visits, therapeutic errors and utilization of US poison centers related to cough and cold medications in this age group. [24] However, there are limited data on cough and cold medications use among children age <2 years with severe respiratory illness. We analyzed two large multicenter cohort studies that enrolled children hospitalized with bronchiolitis before and after the FDA advisory. We hypothesized that there would be decreased cough and cold medications use after the advisory.

METHODS

Prehealth advisory, we conducted a prospective cohort study of bronchiolitis in 30 EDs during the 2004–2006 winter seasons. Post-advisory, we conducted a similar study on inpatient bronchiolitis in 13–16 hospitals during the 2007–2010 winter seasons. A complete description of these studies is available elsewhere.[56] Briefly, both studies included children age <2 years with an attending physician diagnosis of bronchiolitis. So participants were more comparable across studies, children enrolled in the pre-health advisory study were included in the current analysis only if they were hospitalized.

Clinical and demographic data were collected via structured interview and chart review. Over-the-counter (OTC) medication use was assessed by asking: “Over the past week, which “over-the-counter” medicine(s) have you given your child: acetaminophen, ibuprofen, decongestant or cough medicine, vitamins, herbal products, teas or rubs, other.” An affirmative response to “decongestant or cough medicine” was used to identify cough and cold medications use.

Data are presented as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) and medians with interquartile range (IQR). We performed unadjusted analyses using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Kruskall-Wallis tests, as appropriate. All P-values were two-tailed, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to evaluate independent predictors of receiving cough and cold medications. Factors were tested for inclusion if they were associated with the outcome in unadjusted analyses (P<0.20) or were considered potentially clinically significant. The final multivariable model accounts for clustering by site, with results reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95%CI.

RESULTS

In the week before the index visit, 157 of 619 (25%; 95%CI 22–29%) children in the pre-advisory study received cough and cold medications, whereas 156 of 2,154 (7%; 95%CI 6–8%) children in the post-advisory study received cough and cold medications (25% vs. 7%; P<0.001). Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who used cough and cold medications compared with those who did not are presented in Table I (available at www.jpeds.com). In both the pre- and post-advisory cohorts, use of cough and cold medications varied by age (P<0.001), with older children being more likely to receive cough and cold medications (Figure). Despite an overall decrease in cough and cold medications use in the post-advisory cohort, 18% of children age 12–23.9 months received cough and cold medications in the week before their index visit. In the post-advisory cohort alone, cough and cold medications use varied by race, insurance type, breastfeeding status, history of wheezing, and presence of a major relevant co-morbid medical disorder (all P<0.05).

Table 1.

Characteristics of Children Admitted to the Hospital According to Use of Over-the-counter Cough and Cold Medications, Before and After the Advisory.

Pre-advisory cohort, 2004–2006 P value Post-advisory cohort, 2007–2010 P value
No Reported Prior use of OTC CCM (n=462) Reported Prior use of OTC CCM (n=157) No Reported Prior use of OTC CCM (n=1998) Reported Prior use of OTC CCM (n=156)
Age in months, median (IQR) 3.9 (1.7–7.5) 6.6 (2.6–11.5) <0.001 3.8 (1.7–8.0) 8.7 (4.6–14.3) <0.001
Age in months (%) <0.001 <0.001
 <2 months 31 20 29 7
 2–5.9 months 36 27 36 30
 6–11.9 months 21 30 22 28
 12+ months 12 23 13 35
Male (%) 59 54 0.20 59 60 0.85
Race (%) 0.37 0.02
 White 39 46 36 32
 Black 23 24 23 17
 Hispanic 33 27 36 48
 Other 5 3 5 3
Private insurance (%) 34 32 0.66 32 23 0.03
Primary care provider (%) 96 97 0.53 97 97 0.83
Mother smoked during pregnancy (%) 17 23 0.08 15 19 0.19
Smoke exposure in the home (%) 13 18 0.13 13 16 0.23
Gestational age, wks(%) 0.61 0.43
 <32 6 4 6 6
 32–36 14 17 18 14
 ≥37 or ‘full term’ 80 79 75 80
Is or was breastfed (%) 55 51 0.38 62 50 0.005
History of wheezing (%) 25 32 0.12 22 35 <0.001
Major, relevant, comorbid medical disorder (%) 21 19 0.57 20 30 0.006
Presence of apnea (chart) (%) 3 3 0.65 7 6 0.76
Respiratory rate, breath per min, median (IQR) 50 (40 – 60) 48 (40 – 60) 0.26 48 (40–60) 44 (36–56) 0.003
Retractions (%) 0.06 0.07
 none 23 21 21 22
 mild 43 39 42 43
 moderate 24 31 26 19
 severe 3 6 4 3
 missing 7 3 7 12
Oxygen saturation by pulse ox or ABG (%) 0.003 0.008
 <90 8 4 12 13
 90–93.9 13 24 16 25
 ≥94 79 73 72 62
Oral intake (%) 0.60 <0.001
 adequate 62 58 43 37
 inadequate 31 35 43 40
 missing 7 8 14 22
Presence of wheezing (%) 75 87 0.002 64 70 0.14

Abbreviations: OTC denotes over-the-counter; IQR, interquartile range; ED, emergency department; F, Fahrenheit; bpm, beats per minute; ABG, aterial blood gas; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; HRV, human rhinovirus.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Proportion of Children Receiving Cough and Cold Medications by Age, Before and After the Advisory.

In multivariable analysis (Table II) the one independent predictor of cough and cold medications use in both cohorts was older age, with the highest odds ratios in the 12–23.9 month age group [pre-advisory (OR 2.95; 95%CI 1.65–5.29) and post-advisory (OR 11.55; 95%CI 5.89–22.63)]. In the post-advisory cohort, maternal smoking during pregnancy was positively associated with cough and cold medications use (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.01–2.54), and breastfeeding was inversely associated (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.43–0.85).

Table 2.

Multivariable Predictors of Over-the-counter Cough and Cold Medication Use, Before and After the Advisory.

Pre-advisory cohort, 2004–2006 P value Post-advisory cohort, 2007–2010 P value
Odds ratio 95% CI Odds ratio 95% CI
Age
 <2 months 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 2–5.9 months 1.13 0.67–1.90 0.65 3.34 1.71–6.51 <0.001
 6–11.9 months 2.24 1.32–3.80 0.003 5.30 2.69–10.46 <0.001
 12+ months 2.95 1.65–5.29 <0.001 11.55 5.89–22.63 <0.001
Female 1.24 0.85–1.80 0.27 1.08 0.76–1.53 0.66
Race/ethnicity
 White 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Black 0.93 0.58–1.50 0.76 0.70 0.43–1.16 0.16
 Other 0.53 0.19–1.50 0.24 0.42 0.13–1.39 0.15
 Hispanic 0.79 0.50–1.26 0.33 1.43 0.96–2.14 0.08
Mother smoked cigarettes during the pregnancy 1.45 0.89–2.36 0.14 1.60 1.01–2.54 0.04
Patient is or was breastfed 0.92 0.63–1.36 0.69 0.60 0.43–0.85 0.004

Abbreviation: CI denotes confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

We found that cough and cold medications use in children age <2 years hospitalized with bronchiolitis significantly decreased after the withdrawal of infant cough and cold medications formulations and the 2008 FDA advisory. Our findings are in contrast to a recent National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS)/National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) analysis which found no change in over-the-counter (OTC) cough and cold medications utilization in children <2 years seen in ED and ambulatory settings for cough and cold-related symptoms. [7] Given that diphenhydramine and chlorpheniramine were the most frequently prescribed medications in this NHAMCS/NAMCS analysis, one potential explanation for these discrepant results may be that providers feel more comfortable recommending cough and cold medications in children with non-infectious etiologies of cough and congestion.

The strongest warnings against cough and cold medications use are in children age <2 years. Given that the patient population of the two multicenter studies was restricted to children in this age group, we were able to examine variability in use within this key demographic. Despite the overall decrease in cough and cold medications use, nearly 20% of children aged 12–23.9 months in the post-advisory cohort received cough and cold medications. Providers should consider crafting targeted educational interventions on cough and cold medications use for parents of children in this age group, especially during respiratory virus season. This education may become even more important as we move further away from the initial advisory release and the associated media attention.

Another high-yield target group for educational initiatives may be mothers who smoked during pregnancy. Maternal smoking during pregnancy has been associated with lower health literacy. [89] Given that understanding health advisories and correctly interpreting medication labels are important skills for staying up to date with changing recommendations on cough and cold medications use in young children, these associations may in part explain our findings.

A potential limitation of this study is that cough and cold medications use was assessed using parental self-report and thus potentially influenced by both recall bias and social desirability bias. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that there is a concerning level of ongoing use of cough and cold medications in children < 2 years old with respiratory symptoms and identifies some key demographic populations to target with educational interventions.

We found a significant decrease in cough and cold medications use among children age <2 years hospitalized with bronchiolitis after withdrawal of infant cough and cold medications formulations and an FDA health advisory warning against use of these medications. However, given the continued high use in older children after the advisory, parents of children age 12–23 months and mothers who smoked during pregnancy may benefit from targeted educational interventions on cough and cold medications use.

Acknowledgments

MARC-25 was supported by the Thrasher Research Fund and an unrestricted data analysis grant from Merck. MARC-30 was supported by the National Institutes of Health (U01 AI-67693 and K23 AI-77801).

Abbreviations

ED

Emergency Department

OTC

over-the-counter

FDA

Food And Drug Administration

APPENDIX

Principal Investigators of MARC-25 include

C. Baker (Children’s Hospital Oakland, Oakland, CA); B. Barcega (Loma Linda Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA); N. Christopher (Children’s Hospital Medical Center – Akron, Akron, OH); J. Colvin (Stormont-Vail Regional Medical Center, Topeka, KS); R. Cydulka (MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH); D. Damore (New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY); C. Delgado (Egleston Children’s Hospital, Atlanta, GA); R. Flood (Temple University Children’s Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA); D. Fox (St. Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, NY); T. Gaeta (New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY); H. Haddad (Rainbow Babies & Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH); P. Hain (Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital, Nashville, TN); T. Kilkenny (Aultman Hospital, Canton, OH); M. Leber (The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY); F. LoVecchio (Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ); J. Mansbach (Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, MA); A. Marmor (San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA); K. Nibhanipudi (Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York, NY); R. Pappas/M. Rodkey (Hillcrest Hospital/Cleveland Clinic, Mayfield Heights, OH); J. Pardue (East Tennessee Children’s Hospital, Knoxville, TN); R. Place (Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA); R. Ragothaman (Virtua West Jersey Hospital, Voorhees, NJ); M. Rhulen (Toledo Children’s Hospital, Toledo, OH); B Robbins (Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD); H Smithline (Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA); D Teoh (Children’s Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas, TX); T. Thompson (Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR) A. VandenBelt (St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ypsilanti, MI); V. Wang (Children’s Hospital Of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA); and M Waseem (Lincoln Medical Center, Bronx, NY).

Principal Investigators of MARC-30 include

B. Barcega (Loma Linda University Children’s Hospital, Loma Linda, CA); J. Cheng and C. Delgado (Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston, Atlanta, GA); D. Damore and N. Shah (New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY); H. Haddad (Rainbow Babies & Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH); P. Hain and M. Riederer (Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN); F. LoVecchio (Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ); C. Macias (Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX); J. Mansbach (Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA); E. Mowad (Akron Children’s Hospital, Akron, OH); B. Pate (Children’s Mercy Hospital & Clinics, Kansas City, MO); M. J. Sanders (Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX); A. Schroeder (Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA); M. Stevenson (Kosair Children’s Hospital, Louisville, KY); E. Stucky Fisher (Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA); S. Teach (Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC); L. Zaoutis (Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA).

Footnotes

The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health. J.M. and P.P. served as consultants for Regeneron.

The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Accessed May 5th, 2014];FDA release recommendations regarding use of over-the-counter cough and cold products. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2008/ucm116839.htm.
  • 2.Shehab N, Schaefer MK, Kegler SR, Budnitz DS. Adverse events from cough and cold medications after a market withdrawal of products labeled for infants. Pediatrics. 2010;126:1110–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hampton LM, Nguyen DB, Edwards JR, Budnitz DS. Cough and cold medication adverse events after market withdrawal and labeling revision. Pediatrics. 2013;132:1047–54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mazer-Amirshahi M, Reid N, van den Anker J, Litovitz T. Effect of cough and cold medication restriction and label changes on pediatric ingestions reported to United States poison centers. J Pediatr. 2013;163:1372–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mansbach JM, Clark S, Christopher NC, LoVecchio F, Kunz S, Acholonu U, et al. Prospective multicenter study of bronchiolitis: Predicting safe discharges from the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2008;121:680–688. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mansbach JM, Piedra PA, Teach SJ, Sullivan AF, Forgey T, Clark S, et al. Prospective multicenter study of viral etiology and hospital length of stay in children with severe bronchiolitis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:700–6. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mazer-Amirshahi M, Rasooly I, Brooks G, Pines J, May L, van den Anker J. The impact of pediatric labeling changes on prescribing patterns of cough and cold medications. J Pediatric. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.07.047. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sanders LM, Shaw JS, Guez G, Bauer C, Rudd R. Health literacy and child health promotion: Implications for research, clinical care, and public policy. Pediatrics. 2009;124:S306. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1162G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:97–107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES