Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Virology. 2014 Aug 5;0:228–232. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.07.009

A positively selected mutation in the WNV 2K peptide confers resistance to superinfection exclusion in vivo

Corey L Campbell a, Darci R Smith b, Irma Sanchez-Vargas a, Bo Zhang c, Pei-Yong Shi d, Gregory D Ebel a,*
PMCID: PMC4486337  NIHMSID: NIHMS619526  PMID: 25104615

Abstract

Molecular epidemiologic studies of North American (NA) West Nile virus (WNV; Flaviviridae, Flavivirus) have documented the displacement of the introduced NY99 genotype with WN02. In addition, these studies have shown that particular substitutions are under positive selection. One occurs in the C-terminus of the NS4A coding sequence and results in a valine to methionine substitution at position nine of the 2K peptide. 2K-V9M confers the ability to overcome superinfection exclusion in vitro. We hypothesized that WNV strains bearing 2K-V9M have higher fitness than wildtype in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Although infection rates and viral titers were not significantly different, virus dissemination rates were significantly higher with WNV 2K-V9M. As a super-infecting virus, WNV 2K-V9M was more successful than wildtype, however, in a mixed infection, 2K-V9M was not. These data support observations that 2K-V9M confers a context-specific selective advantage in mosquitoes and provides an in vivo mechanism for its positive selection.

Keywords: superinfection exclusion, vector mosquito, flavivirus

Introduction

WNV has caused the largest neuroinvasive arbovirus disease outbreaks recorded in North America (NA, reviewed in (Petersen et al., 2013)). Viral transmission is maintained mainly by passerine bird-Culex mosquito amplification (Jerzak et al., 2005; Kilpatrick et al., 2006; Komar et al., 2003; Nash et al., 2001). The WNV strain first established in NA, NY99, has been supplanted by a second strain, WN02. However rare genome variants continue to circulate regionally (Armstrong et al., 2011;Davis et al., 2005; Ebel et al., 2004; Herring et al., 2007). Ongoing molecular epidemiologic studies documenting the continuing emergence of local variants in nature have provided the opportunity to study positively selected virus variants that may alter transmission dynamics.

A number of naturally occurring positively selected WNV genome variants have been identified. For example, a positively selected mutation in the WNV NS3 protein at T249P was able to significantly increase pathogenicity in American crows (Brault et al., 2007). Another positively selected mutation in the 2K peptide confers a change from valine to methionine at amino acid position 9; it has been identified in multiple natural isolates from mosquitoes and American crows (Armstrong et al., 2011; Pesko et al., 2012). Interestingly, independent studies demonstrated that 2K-V9M allows WNV to replicate in the presence of flavivirus inhibitors in mammalian cell culture (Mertens et al., 2010; Zou et al., 2009a). In an in vitro replicon system it also allowed WNV to overcome superinfection exclusion (Zou et al., 2009b). An additional mutation, identified by serial passage of WNV in vitro, bearing a single nucleotide substitution in NS4A, K124R, also allowed the virus to overcome superinfection exclusion (Zou et al., 2009b). Superinfection exclusion occurs when a cell infected with one virus strain prevents infection with a second virus strain. This phenomenon is well described in mosquito cells (Condreay and Brown, 1986; Karpf et al., 1997), and is thought to, in part, shape transmission dynamics in regions where infection rates are extremely high (Pesko and Mores, 2009). With WNV, superinfection exclusion is most dramatic when the secondary infection is a closely related flavivirus, less clear with more distantly related flaviviruses, such as dengue, and undetectable with a nonflavivirus (Zou et al., 2009b). Therefore we hypothesized that the mechanism that underpins the observed positive selection for 2K-V9M may be an enhanced ability to overcome superinfection exclusion in relevant vector species. We used WNV infectious clones bearing single nucleotide mutations at 2K-V9M or NS4A K124R, as well as the double mutant 2K-V9M, NS4A K124R to characterize the impact of these mutants on the vector competence of a major WNV vector, Cx quinquefasciatus. Genotypes with altered vector competence compared to wildtype infectious clones were then assessed for superinfection exclusion in vivo. 2K-V9M conferred a slight transmission advantage in mosquitoes in isolation, and more substantially as a superinfecting virus. These results provide an in vivo mechanistic link between molecular evolutionary and tissue-culture based studies that have identified this mutation as positively selected.

Results

Viral infection phenotypes

Vector competence phenotypes were tested in adult Cx quinquefasciatus orally infected with one of three WNV point mutants (2K-V9M, NS4a K124R or the double mutant) compared to wildtype (NY99ic). At 7 and 14 days post-infection (dpi), mosquito carcasses, legs/wings, and salivary expectorants were collected for estimation of infection, dissemination and transmission rates, respectively, by plaque titration. There were no significant differences in infection phenotypes at 7dpi (Figure 1A, Table 1). By 14 dpi, the 2K-V9M mutant showed a significantly higher dissemination rate than the NS4A K124R mutant or the double mutant (NS4A K124R, 2K-V9M), compared to NY99ic (Chi-Square=11.66, p=0.0087) (Fig. 1B, Table 1). However, viral titers for bodies remained higher for NY99ic infections than for all mutants (Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.0002).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

At 14 dpi, dissemination rates of 2K V9M WNV were significantly higher than that of WNV NY99_ic. A. 7dpi. B. 14 dpi. Viral titers for positive samples are shown. In A) and B), Left panel: Infection rate is represented by carcass infections; middle panel: dissemination rate represents infection of leg/wings; right panel: transmission rates were determined from salivary expectorants. NY99ic viral titers are significantly higher than all mutants (Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, alpha= 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.0002); NS4A(K124R), 2K-V9M, 2K mutant, NY99ic, wildtype, double mutant (NS4A K124R, 2K-V9M). Bars indicate geometric mean and 95% confidence interval. These data are the compilation of two biological replicates using a total of fifty mosquitoes for each timepoint. Infection rates are shown in Table 1. Plotting and statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism.

Table 1.

Mosquito tissue Infection rates

Infection Rate
carcasses
Dissemination Rate
legs/wings
Transmission Rate
saliva
Strain NS4A 2K Double WT NS4A 2K Double WT NS4A 2K Double WT
7 DPI % 62 88 76 88 2 4 10 10 2 2 8 4

14 DPI % 90 96 80 88 30 160 32 42 226 38 26 32
1

2K-V9M dissemination rate is significantly higher than NY99ic, (Chi-Square=11.66, pvalue=0.0087).

2

Some saliva samples were positive by cytopathic effects assay but could not be quantitated by plaque assay. WT, wildtype. These data reflect the combined results of a total of 50 mosquitoes for each timepoint over two biological replicates.

Superinfection

To investigate the impact of 2K-V9M on the ability to overcome superinfection exclusion, viral fitness was assessed following a dual infection scheme. Mosquitoes were first given a primary peroral infection with a marked WNV reference strain and 5 days later, a secondary infection was established orally with either NY99ic wildtype or the 2K-V9M (Fitzpatrick et al., 2010). Midguts were collected at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days following the second feeding. At 14 dpi, via polySNP analysis (Fitzpatrick et al., 2010; Hall and Little, 2007), mosquito midguts secondarily infected with 2K-V9M had a significantly higher proportion of the superinfecting genotype than did those superinfected by wildtype (Fig. 2) (Mann-Whitney, p value=0.0194). To assess the fitness of 2K-V9M compared to wildtype in a dual infection, but without the requirement for superinfection, mosquitoes were fed on a bloodmeal containing a 56.6%:43.3% mixture of 2K and NY99ref, respectively. The 2K-V9M genotype did not predominate in any mosquito tissue collected at 14 dpi (Table 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Following superinfection of midguts, 2K-V9M is present at higher proportion than wildtype. Data are a compilation of 2 biological replicates. Median values, white circles; shape limits are at the 25th and 75th percentiles; black bars (Tukey whiskers) extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles; shapes are representative of data density estimates. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference (Mann-Whitney, p value=0.0194). Plot created with http://boxplot.tyerslab.com/ (Spitzer et al., 2014). ‘dpi’ indicates day postinfection; N indicates number of midguts in each group. This data reflects two biological replicates.

Table 2.

Mixed Infection

Mixed Infection1 2K V9M 100% REF-100%

Tissue Median %
2K-V9M
genotype
N Std
dev
Median % 2K-
V9M genotype
N Std
dev
Median %
Reference genotype
N Std dev
Midguts 34.3 25 32.9 96.0 7 7.9 97.2 7 3.3
Legs/Wings 7.0 20 33.0 97.8 6 26.4 97.5 8 1.5
Saliva 44.9 12 35.3 86.3 2 3.4 98.24 2 na

2K V9M genotype does not have a competitive fitness advantage over NY99ref in a mixed infection. Mosquitoes were fed a mixed virus of 56.6%: 43.3% (2K V9M : NY99ref). Percent viral genotypes were determined by polySNP.

1

Mixed virus was 57%:43% (Mutant:Reference). N indicates the number of mosquitoes per group. (Std dev), standard deviation.

Discussion

Molecular epidemiologic studies have identified 2K-9M as being a positively selected mutation, and tissue culture studies have suggested that this mutation confers resistance to superinfection exclusion. Accordingly, we evaluated whether this mutation would increase transmission fitness in relevant mosquito vectors. While the 2K-V9M genotype showed increased dissemination compared to wildtype at 14 dpi, wildtype maintained higher body viral titers. Moreover, transmission, indicated by the presence of virus in salivary expectorants, was not increased in the presence of the 2K-V9M mutant. Thus, although 2K-V9M increases spread within the mosquito host, the lack of increased transmission diminishes the impact of this gain of function mutation.

We next evaluated whether 2K-V9M would impact the ability of WNV to overcome superinfection exclusion. We found that at 14 dpi, more secondary infection genotypes representing 2K-V9M were present than those infected with wildtype. We therefore conclude that 2K-V9M confers resistance to superinfection exclusion in vivo in mosquitoes. In addition, these results would suggest that 2K-V9M may allow WNV to replicate more efficiently in mosquitoes infected by mosquito-only flaviviruses (Calzolari et al., 2012; Tyler et al., 2011), although this issue has not been tested directly.

Finally, in a mixed infection competition experiment where mosquitoes were exposed to wildtype and 2K-V9M simultaneously, the 2K-V9M mutant did not have a competitive advantage over NY99ic in any tissue tested. Therefore, 2K-V9M does not possess a selective advantage over wildtype when superinfection of previously infected mosquitoes is not required. Collectively, these results point to a highly context-specific fitness advantage for 2K-V9M, which supports the observations that it is positively selected in nature and its lack of fixation in the population.

The WNV 2K peptide is a 23 amino acid transmembrane peptide at the carboxyterminus of NS4A that spans the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) between NS4A and NS4B; in addition, it serves as a signal peptide for NS4B. 2K is cleaved from NS4A by the NS2B-NS3 viral protease and from NS4B by a host signal peptidase (Nall et al., 2004; Shiryaev et al., 2007). In its mature form as a structural peptide, 2K may alter the topology of the ER during WNV infection. The 2K peptide has been described to be present in vivo fused to the carboxy-terminus of NS4A or the amino-terminus of NS4B (Mertens et al., 2010). Importantly, a study of WNV in human cell culture found that, at the light microscope level of resolution, localization and processing of NS4A-2K and 2K-NS4B remained unaltered with V9M (Mertens et al., 2010). To assess the possible implications of the V9M mutation for membrane topology, the secondary structure of the 2K peptide was assessed upon total cleavage and in the context of the NS4A-2K or 2KNS4B conformations using a structural prediction algorithm (http://harrier.nagahama-i-bio.ac.jp/sosui/sosui_submit.html) (Mitaku et al., 2002). No significant changes to hydrophobicity or overall secondary structure were found. However, the first transmembrane domain of the 2K-V9M-NS4B helices was altered from a primary helix motif to a secondary type helix (Suppl. Figure 1). Primary transmembrane helices contain amphiphilic helical side chains with high hydrophobicity in central residues, and secondary helices have been proposed to play a role in protein active sites (Hirokawa et al., 1998). Another study has shown that WNV NS4B interacts with NS1, and possibly affects replication complexes (Youn et al., 2012). Therefore, one hypothesis for the gain-of-function of 2K-V9M is that it alters function of 2K-NS4B, perhaps by changing protein-protein interactions required for the replication complex formation. In this scenario, 2K-V9M could induce more stable or efficient replication complexes than wildtype, which allow superinfection to occur. Given the data presented, these complexes, however, would not allow mutant viruses to replicate to higher titers than wildtype.

Given that 2K V9M enables WNV to replicate in the presence of the anti-viral agents lycorine and 2’, 5’ oligoadenylate synthetase 1b (Oas1b) in mammalian cells, some have proposed that structural changes to ER membranes occur in the presence of V9M that physically enhance formation of replication complexes (Mertens et al., 2010; Zou et al., 2009a). This hypothesis was based on the interpretation that, in the presence of lycorine, 2K-V9M does not affect viral translation but rather RNA synthesis. In addition, Oas1b activates RNase L, which then cleaves viral dsRNA replicative intermediates (reviewed in (Silverman, 2007)), suggesting that perhaps V9M prevents degradation of replicative intermediates. Therefore, an alternative hypothesis for the viral gain of function mutation imposed by 2K-V9M is that alteration of ER membranes protects virus replicative intermediates from degradation by host defense mechanisms, which could increase viral particle packaging and egress without increasing the replication rate per se.

These experiments describe the phenotypic changes associated with a single amino acid mutation, however, in nature, WNV exists as a mixture of quasispecies that make up a fluid fitness landscape (Jerzak et al., 2005). Individual genotypes may rise to dominance under specific selective constraints and environmental conditions. However, a genotype that is advantageous under a specific set of environmental conditions may not remain dominant when conditions change. Moreover, the combinatorial effects imposed by multiple selective pressures to produce a given virus genotype must be considered. Thus, with 2K-V9M as an individual component of the overall viral population, the data presented here are consistent with the hypothesis that 2K-V9M contributes to fitness increases compared to wildtype, depending on the coinfection status of the mosquito.

In summary, our results demonstrate that the 2K-V9M genotype was similar to wildtype in replication phenotype in mosquitoes, but disseminated more quickly and established secondary infections more readily than wildtype. Therefore, this point mutant seems to alter intra- or intercellular transport mechanisms to evade superinfection exclusion and/or enhance virus dissemination. However, the evidence that 2K-V9M was unable to outcompete wildtype in a mixed infection, restricts the conditions in which it could positively affect virus transmission dynamics in nature. Moreover it seems likely that, 2K-V9M, arising as part of the WNV mutant swarm present in a mosquito, could superinfect previously infected cells, ultimately appearing in the transmitted pool of WNV, where it can be transmitted to a new host. That this mutation has not become fixed in the WNV population supports the observation that its fitness advantage is highly context specific and is it frequently disappears from the consensus WNV sequence due to stochastic or selective mechanisms.

Methods

Viruses

Mutant virus infectious clones (ic), wildtype NY99ic nd the marked reference genotype have been described elsewhere (Fitzpatrick et al., 2010; Shi et al., 2002; Zou et al., 2009b). Virus infectious clones were reverse transcribed from plasmids using standard methods (Shi et al., 2002). Virus stocks were prepared by electroporation of the transcription reactions into baby hamster kidney cells (BHK-21) (ATCC) maintained in MEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 5% C02. Passage 0 virus stocks were used for all experiments described herein. Virus titers were determined by plaque titration on Vero cells using standard methods (Lindsey et al., 1976).

Mosquitoes

Colony Cx quinquefasciatus were maintained at 26–27°;C, 60–70% humidity and a 15:9 (L:D) light cycle. Adult female Cx quinquefasciatus (5–7 days old) were infected by peroral administration of 8 logs plaque-forming units per ml p0 passage mutant, wildtype (NY99ic), or reference virus stocks diluted into defibrinated sheep blood (Colorado Serum Company) and provided to mosquitoes in a water-jacketed membrane feeder using hog gut. At indicated times post-infection, mosquitoes were anesthetized with cold, and carcasses, legs/wings, and salivary expectorants were collected into cell culture media or in viral RNA extraction buffer and stored at −80°C until processing. Following collection of legs and wings, saliva expectorants were collected by inserting each mosquito proboscis into an individual capillary pipette prefilled with type B immersion oil (Electron Microscopy Sciences). After 30 minutes, the capillary was removed and placed directly into a collection tube containing cell culture medium or RNA extraction buffer. After saliva collection, the carcass or midgut was collected, as well. For the vector competence experiments, infection rates were determined by calculating the number of bodies with positive plaque titration results divided by the total number tested. Dissemination rates were determined by calculating the number of legs/wings samples with positive plaque titration results divided by the total number tested. Transmission rates were determined by calculating the number of bodies with positive plaque titration results divided by the total number tested.

Superinfection Exclusion

Adult female mosquitoes were fed a primary bloodmeal of 8 logs PFU/ml of the marked reference genome WNV NY99ic. Engorged females were retained. Egg cups were provided at 2 dpi. Five days after the primary feed, mosquitoes were fed 8 logs PFU/ml of a secondary genotype, either wildtype NY99ic or the WNV 2K-V9M point mutant. At 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post-secondary infection, samples were collected for genotype analysis.

Virus genotyping

Total RNA was extracted from individual mosquito tissues using the manufacturer’s recommendations for the Ambion Viral RNA extraction kit (Life Technologies) on the Kingfisher Flex (ThermoScientific). RT-PCR amplification of a portion of the WNV genome was used for genotype analysis using methods previously described (Fitzpatrick et al., 2010). A portion of the WNV genome was amplified by reverse transcriptase PCR (Qiagen) (5’ primer-GTGGAAGAGGCGGTTGGTGTTACT; 3’ primer-TACTTCACTCCTTCTGGCGGTTCA) and subjected to Sanger sequencing using the primer, GCTCTGCCCCTACATGCCGAAAGT. polySNP analysis, which uses PHRED analysis to read the area under a chromatogram peak, was used to differentiate virus genotypes at positions 8313–8317 (Hall and Little, 2007). The median of all five marked nucleotide positions was used to calculate the proportion of mutant genome present. Median values for each timepoint were entered into Graphpad Prism for statistical calculations.

Mixed infection

Viruses were mixed and confirmed to be 56.6%: 43.3% (2K-V9M: NY99ref) by Sanger sequencing, followed by polySNP analysis. Cx. quinquefasciatus were fed the 2K-V9M / NY99ref mixture at 8 logs pfu/ml in sheep blood, and tissues were collected at 14 dpi for assessment of viral genotype by polySNP.

Supplementary Material

01. Supplemental Figure 1.

Structural prediction of 2K and 2K V9M both alone and when fused to NS4A or NS4B (http://harrier.nagahama-i-bio.ac.jp/sosui/sosui_submit.html). Red circles indicate amino acid position of interest; dark green rectangles indicate primary helices; light green rectangles indicate secondary helices.

Highlights.

  • -

    WNV mutant bearing 2K V9M disseminates more than wildtype in Culex quinquefasciatus

  • -

    WNV 2K V9M replicates to lower titers than WT in mosquitoes

  • -

    WNV 2K V9M overcome superinfection exclusion in in mosquitoes

  • -

    WNV 2K V9M fitness advantage only apparent as a superinfecting virus

Acknowledgments

These studies were supported by the NIH R01 R01AI067380-5. We thank B. Dodd for rearing mosquitoes.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Armstrong PM, Vossbrinck CR, Andreadis TG, Anderson JF, Pesko KN, Newman RM, Lennon NJ, Birren BW, Ebel GD, Henn MR. Molecular evolution of West Nile virus in a northern temperate region: Connecticut, USA 1999–2008. Virology. 2011;417:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brault AC, Huang CY, Langevin SA, Kinney RM, Bowen RA, Ramey WN, Panella NA, Holmes EC, Powers AM, Miller BR. A single positively selected West Nile viral mutation confers increased virogenesis in American crows. Nature genetics. 2007;39:1162–1166. doi: 10.1038/ng2097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Calzolari M, Ze-Ze L, Ruzek D, Vazquez A, Jeffries C, Defilippo F, Osorio HC, Kilian P, Ruiz S, Fooks AR, Maioli G, Amaro F, Tlusty M, Figuerola J, Medlock JM, Bonilauri P, Alves MJ, Sebesta O, Tenorio A, Vaux AG, Bellini R, Gelbic I, Sanchez Seco MP, Johnson N, Dottori M. Detection of mosquito only flaviviruses in Europe. The Journal of general virology. 2012;93:1215–1225. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.040485-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Condreay LD, Brown DT. Exclusion of superinfecting homologous virus by Sindbis virus infected Aedes albopictus (mosquito) cells. Journal of virology. 1986;58:81–86. doi: 10.1128/jvi.58.1.81-86.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis CT, Ebel GD, Lanciotti RS, Brault AC, Guzman H, Siirin M, Lambert A, Parsons RE, Beasley DW, Novak RJ, Elizondo-Quiroga D, Green EN, Young DS, Stark LM, Drebot MA, Artsob H, Tesh RB, Kramer LD, Barrett AD. Phylogenetic analysis of North American West Nile virus isolates, 2001–2004: evidence for the emergence of a dominant genotype. Virology. 2005;342:252–265. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ebel GD, Carricaburu J, Young D, Bernard KA, Kramer LD. Genetic and phenotypic variation of West Nile virus in New York, 2004–2000. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2003;71:493–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzpatrick KA, Deardorff ER, Pesko K, Brackney DE, Zhang B, Bedrick E, Shi PY, Ebel GD. Population variation of West Nile virus confers a host specific fitness benefit in mosquitoes. Virology. 2010;404:89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.04.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall GS, Little DP. Relative quantitation of virus population size in mixed genotype infections using sequencing chromatograms. Journal of virological methods. 2007;146:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2007.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herring BL, Bernardin F, Caglioti S, Stramer S, Tobler L, Andrews W, Cheng L, Rampersad S, Cameron C, Saldanha J, Busch MP, Delwart E. Phylogenetic analysis of WNV in North American blood donors during the 2003–2004 epidemic seasons. Virology. 2007;363:220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirokawa T, Boon-Chieng S, Mitaku S. SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:378–379. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jerzak G, Bernard KA, Kramer LD, Ebel GD. Genetic variation in West Nile virus from naturally infected mosquitoes and birds suggests quasispecies structure and strong purifying selection. The Journal of general virology. 2005;86:2175–2183. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81015-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karpf AR, Lenches E, Strauss EG, Strauss JH, Brown DT. Superinfection exclusion of alphaviruses in three mosquito cell lines persistently infected with Sindbis virus. Journal of virology. 1997;71:7119–7123. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.9.7119-7123.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kilpatrick AM, Daszak P, Jones MJ, Marra PP, Kramer LD. Host heterogeneity dominates West Nile virus transmission. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society. 2006;273:2327–2333. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Komar N, Langevin S, Hinten S, Nemeth N, Edwards E, Hettler D, Davis B, Bowen R, Bunning M. Experimental infection of North American birds with the New York 1999 strain of West Nile virus. Emerging infectious diseases. 2003;9:311–322. doi: 10.3201/eid0903.020628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lindsey HS, Calisher CH, Mathews JH. Serum dilution neutralization test for California group virus identification and serology. Journal of clinical microbiology. 1976;4:503–510. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.6.503-510.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mertens E, Kajaste-Rudnitski A, Torres S, Funk A, Frenkiel MP, Iteman I, Khromykh AA, Despres P. Viral determinants in the NS3 helicase and 2K peptide that promote West Nile virus resistance to antiviral action of 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase 1b. Virology. 2010;399:176–185. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mitaku S, Hirokawa T, Tsuji T. Amphiphilicity index of polar amino acids as an aid in the characterization of amino acid preference at membrane water interfaces. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:608–616. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.4.608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nall TA, Chappell KJ, Stoermer MJ, Fang NX, Tyndall JD, Young PR, Fairlie DP. Enzymatic characterization and homology model of a catalytically active recombinant West Nile virus NS3 protease. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:48535–48542. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406810200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nash D, Mostashari F, Fine A, Miller J, O'Leary D, Murray K, Huang A, Rosenberg A, Greenberg A, Sherman M, Wong S, Layton M, West Nile Outbreak Response Working, G The outbreak of West Nile virus infection in the New York City area in 1999. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;344:1807–1814. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200106143442401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pesko K, Mores CN. Effect of sequential exposure on infection and dissemination rates for West Nile and St. Louis encephalitis viruses in Culex quinquefasciatus. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases. 2009;9:281–286. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2007.0281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pesko KN, Fitzpatrick KA, Ryan EM, Shi PY, Zhang B, Lennon NJ, Newman RM, Henn MR, Ebel GD. Internally deleted WNV genomes isolated from exotic birds in New Mexico: function in cells, mosquitoes, and mice. Virology. 2012;427:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Petersen LR, Brault AC, Nasci RS. West Nile virus: review of the literature. JAMA. 2013;310:308–315. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shi PY, Tilgner M, Lo MK, Kent KA, Bernard KA. Infectious cDNA clone of the epidemic west nile virus from New York City. Journal of virology. 2002;76:5847–5856. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.12.5847-5856.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shiryaev SA, Kozlov IA, Ratnikov BI, Smith JW, Lebl M, Strongin AY. Cleavage preference distinguishes the two component NS2B NS3 serine proteinases of Dengue and West Nile viruses. The Biochemical journal. 2007;401:743–752. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Silverman RH. Viral encounters with 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase and RNase L during the interferon antiviral response. Journal of virology. 2007;81:12720–12729. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01471-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Spitzer M, Wildenhain J, Rappsilber J, Tyers M. BoxPlotR: a web tool for generation of box plots. Nature methods. 2014;11:121–122. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tyler S, Bolling BG, Blair CD, Brault AC, Pabbaraju K, Armijos MV, Clark DC, Calisher CH, Drebot MA. Distribution and phylogenetic comparisons of a novel mosquito flavivirus sequence present in Culex tarsalis Mosquitoes from western Canada with viruses isolated in California and Colorado. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2011;85:162–168. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Youn S, Li T, McCune BT, Edeling MA, Fremont DH, Cristea IM, Diamond MS. Evidence for a genetic and physical interaction between nonstructural proteins NS1 and NS4B that modulates replication of West Nile virus. Journal of virology. 2012;86:7360–7371. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00157-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zou G, Puig-Basagoiti F, Zhang B, Qing M, Chen L, Pankiewicz KW, Felczak K, Yuan Z, Shi PY. A single-amino acid substitution in West Nile virus 2K peptide between NS4A and NS4B confers resistance to lycorine, a flavivirus inhibitor. Virology. 2009a;384:242–252. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zou G, Zhang B, Lim PY, Yuan Z, Bernard KA, Shi PY. Exclusion of West Nile virus superinfection through RNA replication. Journal of virology. 2009b;83:11765–11776. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01205-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01. Supplemental Figure 1.

Structural prediction of 2K and 2K V9M both alone and when fused to NS4A or NS4B (http://harrier.nagahama-i-bio.ac.jp/sosui/sosui_submit.html). Red circles indicate amino acid position of interest; dark green rectangles indicate primary helices; light green rectangles indicate secondary helices.

RESOURCES