Skip to main content
Public Health Action logoLink to Public Health Action
. 2015 Jun 21;5(2):119–121. doi: 10.5588/pha.15.0014

Expanding tuberculosis case notification among marginalized groups in Bangladesh through peer sputum collection

M McDowell 1, M Hossain 1, N Rahman 1, K Tegenfeldt 1, N Yasmin 1, M G Johnson 2,, C D Hamilton 2,3
PMCID: PMC4487490  PMID: 26400382

Abstract

Case notification rates of tuberculosis (TB) in Bangladesh remain poor despite a high burden of disease. Peer sputum collection among underserved populations was implemented to expand case notification and to provide socially empowering roles in society for often excluded members of marginalized populations. Over the 55 months of the evaluation, 32 587 members of key populations were screened for TB, with 1587 smear-positive TB cases detected. Broadening TB services at human immunodeficiency virus drop-in centers using peer sputum collection to target high-risk populations for TB may be an effective way to increase TB case notification among key populations in Bangladesh.

Keywords: HIV, transgenders, epidemiology


Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant public health threat in Bangladesh, a densely populated country of 157 million people in South Asia. In 2013, Bangladesh had the seventh highest number of incident TB cases worldwide, with roughly 350 000 cases and 80 000 deaths.1 TB prevalence rates were estimated at 402 cases per 100 000 population, with high prevalence among both urban and rural populations.1–3 While Bangladesh maintains a low human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence (<1%) in the general population, a steady increase in HIV cases among certain high-risk groups portends higher TB rates due to TB-HIV co-infection.4

Despite such a high TB burden in Bangladesh, case notification rates (the annual number of newly notified cases per 100 000 population) are poor, estimated at approximately 53% — among the lowest in the world.1 TB services have been available to the general population since the Bangladesh National Tuberculosis Program (NTP) adopted the DOTS strategy in 1993, but the services are underutilized.2,5 In particular, certain marginalized populations do not access these health services due to the stigmatization and discrimination associated with their socio-economic status. Key populations at recognized risk for HIV/acquired immune-deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and sexually transmitted infections (STI) include female sex workers (FSW), male sex workers (MSW), transgenders, people who inject drugs (PWID), people living with HIV (PLHIV), and clients of sex workers (CSW). In Bangladesh, these groups are often excluded from health care due to social bias, and may have undiagnosed and untreated TB.4,6 While intensified case finding has been successful in increasing TB case notification in some countries, especially when partnered with HIV services, these key populations remain elusive targets.7–10

The non-profit organization FHI 360 has been providing HIV services and technical assistance in Bangladesh for over 10 years, with funding provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). FHI 360 established branded drop-in sites, known as Modhumita centers, to reach high-risk populations for HIV; 40 Modhumita centers were operating in Bangladesh in 2012 (Figure). These centers offered testing, prevention, and treatment services for HIV and STI, but did not provide additional services such as TB screening, diagnosis, or treatment.

FIGURE.

FIGURE

Distribution of FHI 360 Modhumita centers in Bangladesh, 2012.

ASPECT OF INTEREST

In 2010, the Modhumita centers expanded services to include TB awareness education, sputum collection services, and linkage to TB treatment centers. This novel strategy for Bangladesh centered on using peers as sputum collectors in an attempt to reach key populations. Peer sputum collectors were chosen by the implementing agencies that managed the Modhumita centers, but training was provided by NTP partners. Training included education on TB epidemiology in Bangladesh, signs and symptoms of TB, screening presumptive TB cases with a questionnaire and collecting sputum specimens, establishing reporting requirements for sputum collectors, and maintaining patient confidentiality. Eligibility requirements for sputum collectors included being a community member and familiarity with the Modhumita centers; having a secondary school education was also preferred, except within the transgender community, as most of this group lack secondary education. Sputum collectors were given a small stipend for their work. All collection materials and testing were provided by the NTP.

Peer sputum collectors identified high-risk persons at the Modhumita centers or in the local community, such as sex worker hangouts and drug user hot spots, and screened them using a standard data collection questionnaire. Those with symptoms suggestive of TB were given three collection pots and taught how to collect their own sputum. Sputum collectors returned the following day to gather the three specimens and take them to the nearest testing center. Following testing, sputum collectors delivered the results to the presumptive patients. Individuals with positive test results were linked with DOTS providers and assisted with follow-up visits for the ensuing 6 months.

Informed consent was not required, as this was a retrospective analysis of programmatic data.

Sixty-one peer sputum collectors were trained: 11 FSW, 11 MSW, 8 transgender, 9 PWID, 5 PLHIV, and 17 CSW. Although five HIV-positive clients received training as peer sputum collectors, they were subsequently excluded because of the increased risk of contracting TB. Peer sputum collectors were often the first point of contact for TB care. The total number of persons with presumptive TB who were screened, tested, and treated for TB during January 2010–July 2014 are listed in the Table. Over 32 000 members of key populations were identified with symptoms suggestive of TB and almost 25 000 underwent sputum smear testing. Over a period of 55 months, 1587 smear-positive TB cases were diagnosed among individuals at high risk for HIV. This represents a high burden of undetected disease in these marginalized populations who may otherwise not have sought care.

TABLE.

Total number of persons tested and treated for TB among those with symptoms of TB identified through peer sputum collection among key populations in Bangladesh, January 2010–July 2014

graphic file with name i2220-8372-5-2-119-t01.jpg

This screening strategy can be an empowering experience for members of key populations who are often socially excluded from mainstream society. The community outreach aspect of this technique provides a unique opportunity to engage marginalized groups not only in their own health, but also in the direct care of peers. It helps address the underlying segregation among key populations and appears to be a positive step toward more inclusive attitudes and behaviors towards high-risk groups in Bangladesh and elsewhere, while also providing some income for the sputum collectors.

DISCUSSION

Case notification rates in Bangladesh are hampered by numerous factors, including limited national resources and passive case-detection strategies that often exclude marginalized populations at highest risk for TB. We found that intensified case finding and community outreach using peer sputum collection identified a large number of TB cases who might not have been detected among key populations with poor health-seeking behavior. Despite the program's success, almost 8000 patients screened with chronic cough did not provide sputum for testing and only 85% of the smear-positive patients identified completed a full course of treatment compared to the national average of 92%, likely due to challenges related to the highly mobile nature of this population.1 Despite these disparities, this study demonstrates that expanding TB services at HIV drop-in centers using peer sputum collection to target high-risk populations for TB may be an effective way to bolster TB case notification among these groups. Peer sputum collection has the added benefit of offering key populations self-empowerment, and can play an important role in improving the health of their community.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the peer sputum collectors and all the Modhumita staff for their continuous efforts to fight human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune-deficiency syndrome and tuberculosis in Bangladesh, as well as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for their support. This study was produced by the generous support of the American People through the USAID cooperative agreement No. USAID-Bangladesh-388-A-00-09-00123-00. The contents are the responsibility of FHI 360 and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: none declared.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2014. WHO/HTM/TB/2014.08. apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/137094/1/9789241564809_eng.pdf?ua=1 Accessed May 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Banu S, Rahman M T, Uddin M K et al. Epidemiology of tuberculosis in an urban slum of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. PLOS ONE. 2013:e77721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zaman K, Yunus M, Arifeen S E et al. Prevalence of sputum smear-positive tuberculosis in a rural area in Bangladesh. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:1052–1059. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806006108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Khosla N. HIV/AIDS interventions in Bangladesh: what can application of a social exclusion framework tell us? J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:587–597. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i4.3404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hossain S, Zaman K, Quaiyum A et al. Care seeking in tuberculosis: results from a countrywide cluster randomized survey in Bangladesh. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004766. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khan S I, Hussain M I, Parveen S et al. Living on the extreme margin: social exclusion of the transgender population (hirja) in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:441–451. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i4.3388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hermans S, Nasuuna E, van Leth F et al. Implementation and effect of intensified case finding on diagnosis of tuberculosis in a large urban HIV clinic in Uganda: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:674–682. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fatima R, Qadeer E, Enarson D A et al. Success of active tuberculosis case detection among high-risk groups in urban slums in Pakistan. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18:1099–1104. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eang M T, Satha P, Yadav R P et al. Early detection of tuberculosis through community-based active case finding in Cambodia. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:469–478. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kane S, Dewan P K, Gupta D et al. Large-scale public-private partnership for improving TB-HIV services for high-risk groups in India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14:1066–1068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Action are provided here courtesy of The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

RESOURCES