Abstract
The autosomal recessive form of persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy (PHHI) is associated with mutations in either ABCC8 or KCNJ11 genes. In the present study, we describe the clinical features and results of genetic analysis of 13 Saudi Arabian patients with PHHI. Clinically, most patients presented with infantile seizures and/or developmental delay, with a subset of patients who were also found to have abnormal brain imaging and electrophysiological studies. Interestingly no coding pathogenic mutations were identified in these two genes by direct sequencing. However, two splice variants were identified in ABCC8 gene in two patients, and a large deletion of exons 1-22 of the ABCC8 gene was identified in three patients. Our data shows that large deletions in ABCC8 gene are the common genetic mechanism in the Saudi population.
Keywords: PHHI, persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy, polymorphisms, deletion, ABCC8 gene, KCNJ11 gene
1. Introduction
Persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy (PHHI) (MIM# 256450), previously known as nesidioblastosis, is a disorder characterized by impaired suppression of pancreatic insulin secretion, resulting in hypoglycemia [1,2,3]. PHHI presents clinically in neonates and infants less than one year of age with seizures and coma. Incidence of PHHI in Saudi Arabia has been estimated to be 1 in 2675, which is much higher than the internationally reported incidence of 1:50,000 [2,4,5,6]. PHHI is diagnosed clinically by having a glucose requirement more than 8mg/kg/min, having a glucagon response increasing glucose by more than 30 mg/dL, absent ketones and insulin:glucose more than 0.3 [1,2,7]. PHHI is generally treated with diazoxide and somatostatin analogue. Therapy tends to fail especially in familial cases [2]. PHHI long term complications include mental retardation, epilepsy, pancreatic insufficiency and obesity [8]. Diabetes mellitus has been proposed to be the definite outcome of PHHI on the long term [2].
From a genetic perspective, while most cases of PHHI are sporadic, genetic variants can either be autosomal dominant or recessive [2]. Autosomal dominant forms display mutations in the enzymes glutamate dehydrogenase (GLUD1) or in glucokinase (GCK) [1,2,9]. Autosomal recessive forms have mutations in one of the subunits of the K-ATP channels in the pancreatic beta cells, most commonly mutations in the sulfonylurea receptor (ABCC8 or SUR1) or the inward rectifying potassium channel (Kir6.2 or KCNJ11) [1,2,5,6,9,10,11]. ABCC8 and Kir6.2 are both located on chromosome 11p15.1 (adjunct genes), with ABCC8 having 39 exons, which encode 1581 amino acids, and KCNJ11 having one exon encoding 390 amino acids [10]. Both gene products function in the K-ATP channels that act on glucose-dependent insulin release from pancreatic beta cells. A third type of inheritance is loss of maternal alleles on chromosome 11p15 [1]. Several mutations have been identified and described in both genes, however some reported cases did not have an identified genetic change [5,12,13]. Studies have detected missense and nonsense mutations of both genes in Arabs population [14,15]. Some studies report PHHI associated with Usher syndrome, as genes responsible for normal ear and eye development are located adjacent to the loci of ABCC8 and KCNJ11 [10,16].
Utilizing the highly inbred nature of Saudi population and the increased incidence of PHHI, the objective of this study was to identify genetic changes in both ABCC8 and KCNJ11 in a cohort of Saudi patients with PHHI. Sequencing of coding exons of both genes was performed, and we present in this paper the genetic changes that were detected in our cohort, as well as clinical data on our patients.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Patients and Samples
This study was approved by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (KFSHRC) (RAC#2020007). Patients from pediatric endocrinology clinic who were diagnosed with PHHI were enrolled. Three to five milliliters of blood was collected from patients in EDTA tubes for sequencing and genetic analysis.
Medical and clinical features were recorded for each patient, including birth and developmental history. Comorbidities were noted which includes accompanying congenital malformations if any. Laboratory findings and metabolic profile, which include the above mentioned criteria for diagnosis of PHHI, were noted. To exclude other causes as infantile seizures and developmental delay, which could include congenital neurological defects and/or congenital syndromes such as Usher syndrome that may present with deafness, electrophysiological studies (brainstem evoked auditory potential (BEAP), visual evoked potential (VEP), and electroencephalogram (EEG)) were used. Radiological assessment (brain MRI) was used to exclude focal neurological defects. Medical/surgical treatments also included identifying cases.
2.2. DNA Extraction
DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples from 13 PHHI patients using the Gentra Systems PUREGENE DNA Isolation kit according to manufacturer conditions, with approved written informed consent in adherence to institutional and international guidelines.
2.3. Sequencing and Screening for Variants in ABCC8 and KCNJ11
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the ABI Prism® Big Dye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit as described by the manufacturer. Results were exported in one of several formats for visualization and analysis of sequence was analyzed using SeqMan 6.1 (Lasergene 6 software package, DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The open reading frame (ORF) of ABCC8 and KCNJ11 was sequenced in all patients, and PCR products covered all exons. Primers for both genes are available upon request.
2.4. Confirmation of Deletions Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification
ABCC8 exons were quantified using SALSA MLPA probemix (SALSA MLPA P117 ABCC8 probemix P117-B, MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, Holland), according to manufacturer conditions. MLPA was performed on patient’s samples and controls. Electrophoresis of amplicons was performed on ABI 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY, USA). Data was exported and analyzed using (Coffalyser.Net-01, MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Relative peak area (RPA) values were compared to references controls. Normalization of peak area of each amplicon was preformed according to manufacture protocol.
3. Results
3.1. Clinical Assessment
A total of 14 patients were enrolled in this study (12 patients and a pair of twins). There was one family that had two affected individuals, with the rest of the cases being sporadic. All patients presented as neonatal persistent hypoglycemia and were intolerant to fast. Eleven patients out of 14 presented with neonatal seizures and 13 of 14 patients presented with mental retardation and/or developmental delay. All patients were diagnosed with PHHI according to the criteria mentioned in the introduction. Electrophysiological studies (BEAP): four patients had no response suggesting clinical deafness, three were not tested, and seven patients were normal. Electrophysiological studies (VEP): right patients showed normal results, two patients had no response, while four patients did not have the test. EEG showed generalized epileptiform discharges in seven patients, one patient displayed slow background activity, three patients did not have the EEG done, and three patients were normal. Radiological studies using MRI: one patient showed severe brain atrophy, one patient showed delayed myelination, two patients did not have any radiological studies, one patient had a normal CT but the MRI was not done. On the other hand, nine patients had normal brain MRI.
With regards to medical therapy, all patients were placed on diazoxide and/or octreotide. Ten patients were reported to have failed medical therapy, requiring surgical intervention. One of these patients was recommended for surgical intervention; however, it was not done due to family preferences. Four patients were good responders. Table 1 summarizes the clinical features of each patient.
Table 1.
Patient | Age (at Time of Study Conduction) | Clinical Presentation * | Brainstem Evoked Auditory Potential–BEAP | Visual Evoked Potential–VEP | EEG Findings | Radiological Studies (MRI or CT) | Treatment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 Years | Neonatal seizures, mental retardation, developmental delay | No response bilaterally | Normal | Generalized epileptiform discharges | Normal MRI | Failed medical therapy, surgical intervention performed |
2 | 8 Years | Neonatal seizures | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal MRI | Responded to medical therapy |
3 | 8 Years | Neonatal seizures, mental retardation, developmental delay | Normal | Normal | Severe abnormal epileptiform discharges | Normal MRI | Failed medical therapy, surgical intervention performed |
4 | 4 Years | Neonatal seizures, mental retardation, developmental delay | Normal | Normal | Slow background activity | Normal MRI | Failed medical therapy, surgical intervention performed |
5 | 11 Years | No additional clinical symptoms | Normal | Normal | Not done | None done | Responded to medical therapy |
6 | 6 Months | Neonatal seizures, developmental delay | Not done | Not done | Generalized epileptiform discharges | Normal MRI | Failed medical therapy, surgical intervention performed |
7 | 14 Years (Twin) | Neonatal seizures, mental retardation, developmental delay | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal MRI | Failed medical therapy, surgical intervention performed |
8 | 14 Years (Twin) | Neonatal seizures, mental retardation, developmental delay | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal MRI | Failed medical therapy, surgical intervention performed |
9 | 2 Years | Developmental delay | Not done | Not done | Not done | Normal CT | Responded to medical therapy |
10 | 3 Years | Neonatal seizures, mental retardation, developmental delay | Not done | Not done | Generalized epileptiform discharges | Normal MRI | Responded to medical therapy |
11 | 9 Years | Neonatal seizures, mental retardation, developmental delay, deafness, blindness | No response bilaterally | No response | Generalized epileptiform discharges | MRI: Severe brain atrophy | Failed medical therapy, surgical intervention performed |
12 | 7 Years | Neonatal seizures, mental retardation, developmental delay, deafness, blindness | No response bilaterally | No response | Generalized epileptiform discharges | MRI (brain): Delayed Myelination | Some response to medical therapy - Surgery refused by family |
13 | 6 Years | Neonatal seizures, mental retardation, developmental delay, decreased hearing and vision | No response bilaterally | Normal | Generalized epileptiform discharges | Normal MRI | Failed medical therapy, surgical intervention performed |
14 | 7 Years | Developmental delay | Normal | Not done | Not done | None done | Failed medical therapy, surgical intervention performed |
* In addition to neonatal persistent hypoglycemia and Intolerance to fast.
3.2. Variants Identified in ABCC8 and KCNJ11
Table 2 and Table 3 summarize the results for coding variants identified in ABCC8 and KCNJ11 genes respectively. A total of 20 homozygous variants were identified for ABCC8, and four variants for KCNJ11. Two homozygous intronic variants in the ABCC8 (IVS3 +3 G > A and IVS16 −3 C > T) were identified in a couple of patients suspected to affect splicing. Various intronic variants were identified in ABCC8 follows: IVS3 +77 G > A, IVS4 +14 C > T, IVS6 +87 G > A, IVS11 +51 G > C, IVS11 +53 T > G, IVS11 +73 G > A, IVS18 −51 T > C, IVS18 −65 G > A, IVS23 +17 A > G, IVS33 −27 T > C, IVS34 +62 G > A, IVS38 −40 A > G, IVS38 +54 G > C. Insilco analysis using PolyPhen-2 and mutation taster predicted that most variants in both genes are non-disease causing.
Table 2.
Nucleotide Position | Codon Number | rs Number |
---|---|---|
c.207 T > C | P69P | rs1048099 |
c.1812 C > T | H562H | No rs number |
c.3819 G > A | R1273R | rs1799859 |
c.4231 G > T | A1369S | No rs number |
c.4717 G > A | V1573V | No rs number |
Table 3.
Nucleotide Position | Codon Number | rs Number |
---|---|---|
c.67 A > G | K23E | rs5219 |
c.570 C > T | A190A | rs5218 |
c.1009 G > A | V337I | rs5215 |
c.1143 G > A | K381K | rs8175351 |
3.3. Large Deletions in ABCC8 Gene
MLPA was performed on all patients, 3 patients from different families showed a common deletion that affected exons1-22 of the ABCC8 gene. These patients are not related. This deletion knocks out the N-terminus of the protein including the first conserved ATP binding domain.
4. Discussion
Limitations of our study are related to the availability of the data collected on our patients. Histological data was not done on patients of this study, which represents a possible future approach on PHHI studies in Saudi Arabia. Another limitation of the study that we will need to pay attention to in future studies is better documentation of patient clinical and biochemical profiles. From a clinical point of view, three patients have clinical findings suggestive of deafness, which has been previously reported in the literature, where deletions in the ABCC8 gene also cause deletions in an adjacent gene USH1C associated with hearing loss (Usher syndrome) [10,16]. In terms of biochemical profiles, future studies should include better documentation of acylcarnitines and urine organic acids. This is because HADHSC gene mutations have been described in the literature as potential causes of PHHI [17].
Other studies characterized genetic changes that affect another regulatory portion of the potassium channels in beta cells that caused diabetes in affected individuals [18,19]. This is another possibility to investigate in which there may another change that causes hyperinsulinism instead. Genes other than ABCC8 and KCNJ11 have been described in the literature, including UCP2 (in both animal models and human patients) [20].
Another hypothesis that explains the mutations we report is different genetic composition of different populations. As mentioned before, PHHI is more prevalent in Saudi Arabia than the world population. One of the explanations is the highly inbred nature of the Saudi community, which may explain the emergence of new mutations in ABCC8, KCNJ11, or other novel genes. This explanation is similar to previous literature, where a study reports novel genetic mutations in ABCC8 (macrodeletion) that was found in the Spanish population patients, which were not characterized in the literature before [5], three of our patients harbored a common homozygous deletion of exons 1–22. A study also characterized novel mutations in ABCC8 and KCNJ11 in the Russian population, which were novel loci for susceptibility to both type II diabetes and altered insulin secretion [21].
Clinically, only 4 patients out of 13 responded to medical treatment, which is consistent with previous report where genetic changes in ABCC8 and KCNJ11 did not result in a complete loss of function [22]. There are reports of patients who failed medical therapy, who had ABCC8 mutations, but not KCNJ11, similar to our surgical patients [23,24]. This suggests that ABCC8 mutations are associated clinically with worse outcome and did not respond to medical therapy than KCNJ11. Also, some of our patients had negative test to VEP, which also suggests eye abnormalities as previously reported [10]. These findings suggest that symptoms of PHHI and hearing loss are related both clinically and genetically, and pave the way to better characterization of both diseases. Our patients were not evaluated for USH1C genetic changes, which represents a future direction of the study.
Future directions for studying PHHI in Saudi Arabia include utilizing other techniques in scanning for genetic abnormalities; for example, whole genome sequencing, the recruitment of more patients, and also to analyze unaffected individuals in families with PHHI, especially if any is diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Another future direction would be to recruit adult patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia that is not due to an insulinoma. This pool of patients has been described before in the literature, but were not found to have mutations in both ABCC8 and KCJN11, which again further reinforces the idea that hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia can be multifactorial [25,26]. Furthermore, we are only reporting changes in 13 patients. As mentioned earlier, PHHI has a higher incidence in Saudi Arabia than what would be predicted. This represents a future direction of this study in which we would be recruiting more patients and families to increase the power of the study. One consideration for the data above is that the families recruited to the study mostly come from rural backgrounds where consanguinity is prevalent. This rural background could possibly be a source of late-look bias, since PHHI is associated with infant mortality (we are only seeing the cases that survive long enough to be seen at our center). Therefore, a future direction of this study is to have clinical teams recruit and screen patients in rural areas, which will result in a wider cohort and a higher chance of identifying other genetic changes associated with PHHI.
5. Conclusions
Mutations that are described above for both ABCC8 and KCNJ11 are consistent with previous studies. Studies report a mosaic nonsense mutation in ABCC8, as well as nonsense mutations in KCNJ11 [27,28]. Similar to our study, there was a previous report of splice-site mutations in the ABCC8 gene [14]. Nonsense mutations were not identified in our patients, which highlights that PHHI can be caused by a variety of genetic changes. The fact that the mutations above are unlikely to cause disease hints at new possibilities in terms of the pathogenesis of PHHI in Saudi population. A previous study suggested another model of inheritance of uniparental disomy and paternal inheritance of KATP (K-ATP) genes, which produces focal lesions. The same study also proposed a mosaic inheritance pattern for PHHI [27].
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC) (RAC#2020007). We would like to acknowledge the sequencing core facility at KFSHRC for their contributions.
Author Contributions
All co-authors have contributed, reviewed and agreed with the contents of the design, data analysis, writing up and revision of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Kaczirek K., Niederle B. Nesidioblastosis: An old term and a new understanding. World J. Surg. 2004;28:1227–1230. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7598-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bin-Abbas B.S., Al-Mulhim A.N., Sakati N.A., Al-Ashwal A.A. Persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy in 38 children. Saudi Med. J. 2003;24:890–894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hussain K., Aynsley-Green A. Hyperinsulinism in infancy: Understanding the pathophysiology. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2003;35:1312–1317. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(03)00103-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abu-Osba Y.K., Manasra K.B., Mathew P.M. Complications of diazoxide treatment in persistent neonatal hyperinsulinism. Arch. Dis. Child. 1989;64:1496–1500. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.10.1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fernandez-Marmiesse A., Salas A., Vega A., Fernandez-Lorenzo J.R., Barreiro J., Carracedo A. Mutation spectra of ABCC8 gene in Spanish patients with Hyperinsulinism of Infancy (HI) Hum. Mutat. 2006 doi: 10.1002/humu.9401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dunne M.J., Kane C., Shepherd R.M., Sanchez J.A., James R.F.L., Johnson P.R.V., Aynsley-Green A., Lu S., Clement J.P., Lindley K.J., et al. Familial persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy and mutations in the sulfonylurea receptor. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997;336:703–706. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703063361005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yorifuji T. Congenital hyperinsulinism: Current status and future perspectives. Ann. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;19:57–68. doi: 10.6065/apem.2014.19.2.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mercimek-Mahmutoglu S., Rami B., Feucht B., Herle M., Rittinger O., Stoeckler-Ipsiroglu S., Schober E. Long-term follow-up of patients with congenital hyperinsulinism in Austria. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;21:523–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meissner T., Beinbrech B., Mayatepek E. Congenital hyperinsulinism: Molecular basis of a heterogeneous disease. Hum. Mutat. 1999;13:351–361. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1999)13:5<351::AID-HUMU3>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hussain K., Bitner-Glindzicz M., Blaydon D., Lindley K.J., Thompson D.A., Kriss T., Rajput K., Ramadan D.G., Al-Mazidi Z., Cosgrove K.E., et al. Infantile hyperinsulinism associated with enteropathy, deafness and renal tubulopathy: Clinical manifestations of a syndrome caused by a contiguous gene deletion located on chromosome 11p. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004;17:1613–1621. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2004.17.12.1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Darendeliler F., Bas F. Hyperinsulinism in infancy—Genetic aspects. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Rev. 2006;3:521–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tornovsky S., Crane A., Cosgrove K.E., Hussain K., Lavie J., Heyman M., Nesher Y., Kuchinski N., Ben-Shushan E., Shatz O., et al. Hyperinsulinism of infancy: Novel ABCC8 and KCNJ11 mutations and evidence for additional locus heterogeneity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004;89:6224–6234. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kukuvitis A., Deal C., Arbour L., Polychronakos C. An autosomal dominant form of familial persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy, not linked to the sulfonylurea receptor locus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997;82:1192–1194. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.4.3904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thomas P.M., Cote G.J., Wohllk N., Haddad B., Mathew P.M., Rabl W., Aguilar-Bryan L., Gagel R.F., Bryan J. Mutations in the sulfonylurea receptor gene in familial persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy. Science. 1995;268:426–429. doi: 10.1126/science.7716548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thomas P., Ye Y., Lightner E. Mutation of the pancreatic islet inward rectifier Kir6.2 also leads to familial persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1996;5:1809–1812. doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.11.1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bitner-Glindzicz M., Lindley K.J., Rutland P., Blaydon D., Smith V.V., Milla P.J., Hussain K., Furth-Lavi J., Cosgrove K.E., Shepherd R.M., et al. A recessive contiguous gene deletion causing infantile hyperinsulinism, enteropathy and deafness identifies the Usher type 1C gene. Nat. Genet. 2000;26:56–60. doi: 10.1038/79178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hussain K. Insights in congenital hyperinsulinism. Endocr. Dev. 2007;11:106–121. doi: 10.1159/000111066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang H., Craig R.L., Schay J., Chu W., Das S.K., Zhang Z., Elbein S.C. Alpha-endosulfine, a positional and functional candidate gene for type 2 diabetes: Molecular screening, association studies, and role in reduced insulin secretion. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2004;81:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2003.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gloyn A.L., Siddiqui J., Ellard S. Mutations in the genes encoding the pancreatic beta-cell KATP channel subunits Kir6.2 (KCNJ11) and SUR1 (ABCC8) in diabetes mellitus and hyperinsulinism. Hum Mutat. 2006;27:220–231. doi: 10.1002/humu.20292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gonzalez-Barroso M.M., Giurgea I., Bouillaud F., Anedda A., Bellanne-Chantelot C., Hubert L., de Keyzer Y., de Lonlay P., Ricquier D. Mutations in UCP2 in congenital hyperinsulinism reveal a role for regulation of insulin secretion. PLOS ONE. 2008;3:e3850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chistiakov D.A., Potapov V.A., Khodirev D.C., Shamkhalova M.S., Shestakova M.V., Nosikov V.V. Genetic variations in the pancreatic ATP-sensitive potassium channel, beta-cell dysfunction, and susceptibility to type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2009;46:43–49. doi: 10.1007/s00592-008-0056-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Henwood M.J., Kelly A., Macmullen C., Bhatia P., Ganguly A., Thornton P.S., Stanley C.A. Genotype-phenotype correlations in children with congenital hyperinsulinism due to recessive mutations of the adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel genes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005;90:789–794. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Taguchi T., Suita S., Ohkubo K., Ono J. Mutations in the sulfonylurea receptor gene in relation to the long-term outcome of persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2002;37:593–598. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.31616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Darendeliler F., Fournet J.C., Bas F., Junien C., Gross M.S., Bundak R., Saka N., Gunoz H. ABCC8 (SUR1) and KCNJ11 (KIR6.2) mutations in persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy and evaluation of different therapeutic measures. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002;15:993–1000. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2002.15.7.993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Service F.J., Natt N., Thompson G.B., Grant C.S., van Heerden J.A., Andrews J.C., Lorenz E., Terzic A., Lloyd R.V. Noninsulinoma pancreatogenous hypoglycemia: A novel syndrome of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia in adults independent of mutations in Kir6.2 and SUR1 genes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999;84:1582–1589. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.5.5645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kloppel G., Anlauf M., Raffel A., Perren A., Knoefel W.T. Adult diffuse nesidioblastosis: Genetically or environmentally induced? Hum. Pathol. 2008;39:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hussain K., Flanagan S.E., Smith V.V., Ashworth M., Day M., Pierro A., Ellard S. An ABCC8 gene mutation and mosaic uniparental isodisomy resulting in atypical diffuse congenital hyperinsulinism. Diabetes. 2008;57:259–263. doi: 10.2337/db07-0998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nestorowicz A., Inagaki N., Gonoi T., Schoor K.P., Wilson B.A., Glaser B., Landau H., Stanley C.A., Thornton P.S., Seino S., et al. A nonsense mutation in the inward rectifier potassium channel gene, Kir6.2, is associated with familial hyperinsulinism. Diabetes. 1997;46:1743–1748. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.11.1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]