Skip to main content
PMC home page
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz logoLink to Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
. 2015 Apr;110(2):272–274. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760140371

Molecular diagnosis of strongyloidiasis in tropical areas: a comparison of conventional and real-time polymerase chain reaction with parasitological methods

Fabiana Martins de Paula 1,2,+, Fernanda de Mello Malta 1,3, Priscilla Duarte Marques 1, Renata Barnabé Sitta 1, João Renato Rebello Pinho 1,3, Ronaldo César Borges Gryschek 1,2, Pedro Paulo Chieffi 1,4
PMCID: PMC4489462  PMID: 25946255

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the use of conventional polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the diagnosis of human strongyloidiasis from stool samples in tropical areas. Stool samples were collected from individuals and were determined to be positive for Strongyloides stercoralis (group I), negative for S. stercoralis (group II) and positive for other enteroparasite species (group III). DNA specific to S. stercoralis was found in 76.7% of group I samples by cPCR and in 90% of group I samples by qPCR. The results show that molecular methods can be used as alternative tools for detecting S. stercoralis in human stool samples in tropical areas.

Keywords: Strongyloides stercoralis, molecular diagnosis, conventional PCR, real-time PCR

Strongyloidiasis is an intestinal infection that is caused by the nematode Strongyloides stercoralis and is estimated to affect 30-100 million people worldwide (Olsen et al. 2009). In endemic areas, chronic infections can be maintained asymptomatically for decades through cycles of autoinfection. Furthermore, this helminthiasis presents the potential for hyperinfection and disseminated disease in immunocompromised patients (Mejia & Nutman 2012). Therefore, the development of highly sensitive diagnostic tests to detect chronic cases of strongyloidiasis is crucial to prevent life-threatening infections (Paula & Costa-Cruz 2011).

DNA detection is increasingly being used to identify parasites and it could solve current problems in the diagnosis of human strongyloidiasis (ten Hove et al. 2009). However, the advantages and disadvantages of conventional polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the diagnosis of human strongyloidiasis have not been discussed in the literature. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate cPCR and qPCR regarding the detection of Strongyloides stercoralis DNA from stool samples in tropical areas.

Stool samples from 100 patients (45 males and 55 females, average age 45.6 years) seen at the Clinics Hospital of Medical School of University of São Paulo (HC-FMUSP) were collected and immediately examined using the methods of Lutz (1919) and Rugai et al. (1954) and by agar plate culture (Koga et al. 1991). The samples were divided into three groups: group I (n = 30), stool samples positive for S. stercoralis by at least one parasitological method; group II (n = 40), stool samples negative by all parasitological methods, and group III (n = 30), stool samples positive for other enteroparasites. The samples in group III were positive for Schistosoma mansoni (n = 7), hookworm (n = 4), Ascaris lumbricoides (n = 3), Hymenolepis nana (n = 1), Enterobius vermicularis (n = 1), Giardia lamblia (n = 4), Endolimax nana (n = 4), Blastocystis sp. (n = 2), Entamoeba coli (n = 1) and the species found in three poly-infected samples (S. mansoni, A. lumbricoides, E. coli, Blastocystis sp. and E. nana; hookworm, S. mansoni, E. nana and Blastocystis sp.; hookworm, E. coli and Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar). This study was approved by the Research Ethical Committee of the HC-FMUSP (protocol 0123/10).

After the parasitological methods were performed, an aliquot of the stool sample was preserved in 70% ethanol and maintained at 4ºC until subsequent DNA extraction. Approximately 500 mg of stool was shaken vigorously and centrifuged. The resulting pellet was washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (0.01 mol/L, pH 7.2), after which DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The extracted DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV-VIS spectrophotometer v.3.2.1 (NanoDrop Technologies, USA).

The primers Stro18S-1530F and Stro18S-1630R were used to amplify DNA from S. stercoralis, as described by Verweij et al. (2009). The cPCR reaction was performed in a final volume of 25 µL, using 10 ng of DNA. The PCR products were loaded on a 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and separated by electrophoresis in 1X TAE buffer. DNA extracted from filariform larvae of S. stercoralis obtained from positive agar plates was used as a positive control. The human β-globin gene was used as an internal control (Saiki et al. 1985) and distilled water was used as a negative control.

qPCR was performed according to the protocol described by Verweij et al. (2009). For each reaction, 10 ng of DNA and the Stro18S-1586T probe (2.5 pmol/µL) were combined in a final volume of 12.5 µL. The TaqMan(r) exogenous internal control kit (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, USA) was used as a control. The qPCR reactions were performed using an ABI 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies).

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad (GraphPad Software, USA). The results of each method were compared with those of the parasitological techniques and the degree of agreement between the techniques was verified with the kappa (ҡ) coefficient and the respective 95% confidence interval.

Among stool samples in group I, 14 (46.7%) were positive for S. stercoralis by the Lutz method, 19 (63.3%) were positive by the Rugai method and 27 (90%) were positive by agar-plate culture. Studies have demonstrated the high sensitivity of agar-plate culture, even when only a few worms are present (Inês et al. 2011).

Specific amplification of S. stercoralis DNA was observed (Table). In group I, S. stercoralis DNA was amplified in 23 of 30 samples (sensitivity, 76.7%). In group II, DNA was detected in seven of 40 samples. In group III, DNA was amplified in samples positive for hookworm (n = 2) and in poly-infected samples (n = 2). Considering groups II and III together, the specificity of cPCR was 84.3%.

TABLE. Molecular methods for the detection of Strongyloides stercoralis.

cPCR n (%)a qPCR n (%)b
Samples n Positive Negative Positive Negative
Group I 30 23 (76.7) 7 (23.3) 27 (90) 3 (10)
(27.83-39.2)c NA
Group II 40 7 (17.5) 33 (82.5) 7 (17.5) 33 (82.5)
(33.13-38.39)c (40.41-46.89)c
Group III 30 4 (16.7) 36 (83.3) 3 (10) 27 (90)
(30.7-37.08)c (39.64-44.73)c
Open in a new tab
a

: kappa coefficient (ҡ) = 0.710 (0.565-0.855)

b

: ҡ = 0.587 (0.417-0.757)

c

: threshold cycle value range; cPCR: conventional polymerase chain reaction; NA: no amplification; qPCR: quantitative PCR.

The sensitivity of qPCR was determined with a serial dilution curve (10-1 to 10-10), performed in triplicate, using DNA from the infective larvae of S. stercoralis at an initial concentration of 21.39 ng/µL. Samples with a cycle threshold (CT) value > 39.2 were considered negative to prevent false-positive results because the samples are from tropical areas. S. stercoralis-specific amplification using qPCR was observed in 27 of 30 samples from group I. In group II, DNA amplification was observed in seven of 40 samples. In stool samples from group III, DNA amplification was observed in several samples, including samples positive for hookworm (n = 2) and in poly-infected samples (n = 1). The sensitivity and specificity of qPCR were 90% and 85.7%, respectively.

The intermittent nature of the elimination of larvae and the occasional presence of dead larvae may explain the false-negative parasitological results in groups II and III and may also explain the positive results found using molecular techniques. As reported previously, the analysis of consecutive samples can increase the sensitivity of parasitological methods (Khieu et al. 2013). Furthermore, intestinal parasites are widespread in humans living in tropical and subtropical countries, which present favourable climatic conditions for their development. In Brazil, epidemiological studies indicate that significant portions of the populations analysed were positive for parasites (Gonçalves et al. 2011). DNA competition in samples from endemic areas frequently leads to non-specific amplification.

The results obtained using molecular methods in this study identified false-negative results in some specimens. A possible explanation for this could be that amount of faecal sample is greater are analysed using parasitological techniques (Verweij et al. 2009). In a recent study, Moghaddassani et al. (2011) reported 100% sensitivity for cPCR compared with agar-plate culture; however, these authors used 3 g of each faecal sample for DNA extraction, whereas 500 mg of each faecal sample was used in this work.

In the present study, a comparison of the results showed that qPCR was more sensitive and specific than cPCR, presenting better ҡ values (0.710), considering the parasitological methods to be the gold standard. Disagreements in the results were observed in all groups; some samples were negative by cPCR, but were positive by qPCR and the opposite was observed, as well. Different results for qPCR were reported by Verweij et al. (2009) and Schär et al. (2013), with lower sensitivity and higher specificity.

Real-time qPCR entails higher overall costs, which make cPCR a more cost-effective methodology. If a laboratory has good infrastructure and the reagents required for qPCR, then this technique becomes very attractive. However, in countries where resources are limited, cPCR can be used as an alternative for the detection of S. stercoralis. The development and implementation of new detection methods involving molecular techniques are of fundamental importance for the accurate detection of parasites by PCR in the future. Molecular techniques have increasingly been used as diagnostic tools for parasites; however, new studies are of fundamental importance for discovering new target sequences and also for improving the interpretation of results, especially for determining the CT values to be used as cut-off values.

This study demonstrated that molecular methods are sensitive and specific for detecting S. stercoralis in human stool samples. Thus, cPCR, as well as qPCR, can be used as alternative tools for detecting S. stercoralis in human stool samples in tropical areas.

Footnotes

Financial support: FAPESP (2010/51110-2)

REFERENCES

  1. Gonçalves ALR, Belizário TL, Pimentel JB, Penatti MPA, Pedroso RJ. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in preschool children in the region of Uberlândia, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011;44:191–193. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822011005000022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Inês EJ, Souza JN, Santos RC, Souza ES, Santos FL, Silva ML, Silva MP, Teixeira MCA, Soares NM. Efficacy of parasitological methods for the diagnosis ofStrongyloides stercoralisand hookworm in faecal specimens. Acta Trop. 2011;120:206–210. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Khieu V, Schär F, Marti H, Sayasone S, Duong S, Muth S, Odermatt P. Diagnosis, treatment and risk factors ofStrongyloides sterco- ralisin schoolchildren in Cambodia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2035–e2035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koga K, Kasuya S, Khamboonruang C, Sukhavat K, Ieda M, Takatsuka N, Kita K, Ohtomo H. A modified agar plate method for detection ofStrongyloides stercoralis . Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;45:518–521. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1991.45.518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lutz A. Schistosomum mansoni and schistosomatosis observed in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1919;11:109–140. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mejia R, Nutman TB. Screening, prevention and treatment for hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated infections caused byStrongyloides stercoralis . Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:458–463. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283551dbd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moghaddassani H, Mirhendi H, Hosseini M, Rokni M, Mowlavi G, Kia E. Molecular Diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection by PCR detection of specific DNA in human stool samples. Iran J Parasitol. 2011;6:23–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Olsen A, van Lieshout L, Marti H, Polderman T, Polman K, Steinmann P, Stothardg R, Thyboh S, Verweij JJ, Magnussena P. Strongyloidiasis - the most neglected of the neglected tropical diseases? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:967–972. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Paula FM, Costa-Cruz JM. Epidemiological aspects of strongyloidiasis in Brazil. Parasitology. 2011;138:1331–1340. doi: 10.1017/S003118201100120X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rugai E, Mattos T, Brisola AP. Nova técnica para isolar larvas de nematóides das fezes: modificação do método de Baermann. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz. 1954;14:5–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis KB, Horn GT, Erlich HA, Arnheim N. Enzyme amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 1985;230:1350–1354. doi: 10.1126/science.2999980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schär F, Odermatt P, Khieu V, Panning M, Duong S, Muth S, Marti H, Kramme S. Evaluation of real-time PCR for Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm as diagnostic tool in asymptomatic schoolchildren in Cambodia. Acta Trop. 2013;126:89–92. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ten Hove RJ, van Esbroeck M, Vervoort T, van den Ende J, van Lieshout L, Verweij JJ. Molecular diagnostics of intestinal parasites in returning travellers. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:1045–1053. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0745-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Verweij JJ, Canales M, Polman K, Ziem J, Brienen EAT, Polderman AM, van Lieshout L. Molecular diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis in faecal samples using real-time PCR. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:342–346. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz are provided here courtesy of Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

RESOURCES