Abstract
Purpose
Mounting evidence supports the clinical significance of gene mutations and immunogenetic features in common mature B-cell malignancies.
Experimental Design
We undertook a detailed characterization of the genetic background of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), using targeted re-sequencing and explored potential clinical implications in a multinational cohort of 175 SMZL patients.
Results
We identified recurrent mutations in TP53 (16%), KLF2 (12%), NOTCH2 (10%), TNFAIP3 (7%), MLL2 (11%), MYD88 (7%) and ARID1A (6%), all genes known to be targeted by somatic mutation in SMZL. KLF2 mutations were early, clonal events, enriched in patients with del(7q) and IGHV1-2*04 B-cell receptor immunoglobulins, and were associated with a short median time-to-first-treatment (0.12 vs. 1.11 yrs; P=0.01). In multivariate analysis mutations in NOTCH2 (HR 2.12, 95%CI 1.02-4.4, P=0.044) and 100% germline IGHV gene identity (HR 2.19, 95%CI 1.05-4.55, P=0.036) were independent markers of short time-to-first-treatment, while TP53 mutations were an independent marker of short overall survival (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.08-5.2, P=0.03).
Conclusion
We identify key associations between gene mutations and clinical outcome, demonstrating for the first time that NOTCH2 and TP53 gene mutations are independent markers of reduced treatment-free and overall survival, respectively.
Introduction
Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare chronic B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder that predominantly affects elderly patients and involves the spleen, bone marrow, and usually the peripheral blood (1). The diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical, morphological, histopathological and immunophenotypic data, that serve to distinguish it from other splenic lymphomas (1). Additional distinctive biological features of SMZL include a remarkable bias to the expression of clonotypic B-cell receptors (BcR) utilizing the IGHV1-2*04 gene and frequent deletions of chromosome 7q (2,3). The median survival of SMZL is around 10 years; 70% of patients require treatment for progressive, symptomatic disease and 5-10% undergo transformation into large B-cell lymphoma. Response rates to splenectomy, single agent Rituximab and Rituximab plus chemotherapy are high but approximately 40% of patients develop progressive disease within 5 years (4,5).
Easily measured, non disease-specific, parameters such as haemoglobin, platelet count, LDH, serum albumin and the presence of extrahilar lymphadenopathy have prognostic significance in multivariate analysis for overall survival and have led to the introduction of scoring systems and a prognostic index (6-8). In contrast, the value of biomarkers to predict outcome is much less clear. Unmutated immunoglobulin heavy variable (IGHV) genes, karyotypic complexity, TP53 loss/mutation alone or in combination with del(8p), and del(14q) have all been suggested to have an adverse prognostic significance in univariate analyses but none have been confirmed in multivariate analyses (3,9-13). Candidate gene screening and more recently, whole genomic or whole exomic sequencing (WES) studies in small patient cohorts have identified recurrent mutations of genes involved in NOTCH, BcR, Toll-like receptor (TLR) and NF-κB signaling pathways, chromatin remodelling and the cytoskeleton (14-17). However, targeted resequencing of larger patient cohorts has resulted in conflicting data on the incidence and prognostic significance of NOTCH2 mutations while little is known about the clinical significance of other gene mutations (14,15).
These observations highlight the need for larger studies to determine a more comprehensive picture of the clinical significance of gene mutations in SMZL. Accordingly, using a targeted re-sequencing approach, we screened for mutations in the largest cohort of well-characterised SMZL cases published to date [n=175] and identified a number of gene mutations that contribute to reduced outcome in SMZL. Most notably we demonstrate for the first time that previously known gene mutations (NOTCH2 and TP53) are independent markers of poor survival.
Material and methods
Patients and samples
Table 1 describes our cohort of 175 SMZL patients from eight centres across Europe, all meeting established diagnostic criteria (18). The mean time from diagnosis to sampling was 3.2 years (0-24, SD = 4.7). Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) was excluded in CD5+ve cases using FISH and conventional cytogenetics. Splenic lymphoma/leukemia unclassifiable (SLLU) was precluded either by splenic histopathology or by omission of SLLU-variant cases with distinctive cytology, such as those with splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRL). Each transformation event was diagnosed histologically. Informed patient consent was obtained according to the declaration of Helsinki and the study was ethically approved by the local REC.
Table1. Patient Characteristics.
Variable | Definition | N | % |
---|---|---|---|
Number of Patients | SMZL diagnosis | 175 | 100% |
Age at Diagnosis | mean (range) | 68 (36-90) | |
IGHV genes | IGHV1-2*04 | 16 | 13% |
not IGHV1-2*04 | 108 | 87% | |
del(7q) status from karyotype | del(7q) | 17 | 19% |
normal | 74 | 81% | |
Surface CD5 FACS result | CD5+ | 40 | 27% |
CD5− | 108 | 73% | |
WBC | mean (range) (×109/L) | 20 (0.5-158) | |
Hb | <12 g/dl | 73 | 44% |
≥12 g/dl | 93 | 56% | |
Lymphocyte count | <4×109/L | 41 | 27% |
≥4×109/L | 110 | 73% | |
Platelets <100×109/L | <100×109/L | 30 | 18% |
≥100×109/L | 134 | 82% | |
high-risk FISH results | del(17p) | 10 | 33% |
normal | 20 | 67% | |
Splenectomy | YES | 55 | 34% |
NO | 109 | 67% | |
Transformation to large cell lymphoma | YES | 19 | 17% |
NO | 91 | 83% | |
TTFT status | treated (inc. Splenectomy) | 122 | 74% |
Untreated | 42 | 26% | |
Event-Free Survival status | Event (Death, transformation, 2nd Tx) | 52 | 44% |
No Event | 65 | 56% | |
Status (Alive or Dead at last followup) | Dead | 43 | 25% |
Alive | 126 | 75% |
Footnote: Complex Karyotype was defined as ≥2 cytogenetically-visible clonal alterations; Tx: treatment
DNA was extracted from either peripheral blood [n=135], bone marrow [n=22], spleen [n=17] or lymph nodes [n=1]. Germline DNA was obtained from buccal cells or sorted T cells [n=25]. The Sequential DNA samples from 9 cases either diagnosed as clonal lymphocytosis of marginal-zone origin (19) [CBL-MZ, n=1] or SMZL [n=8] (mean of 4.3 yrs between samples, Supp Table 1) were evaluated to investigate the clonal evolution of key gene mutations.
Haloplex Re-sequencing and Sanger validation
189 DNA samples from 175 SMZL cases were analysed with Haloplex Target Enrichment system (Agilent Technologies) that enriched 2.39 Mb of genomic DNA for the coding regions of 49 genes known to be targeted by somatic mutations in SMZL, and an additional 719 genes with a postulated role in the pathophysiology of SMZL or other chronic B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (Supp Methods and Supp Table 2). Independent analysis was performed by the University of Southampton and Uppsala University to allow the identification of high-confidence variants in our cohort (Supp Methods).
Using conventional Sanger sequencing, we validated 86 variants identified in a number of genes using the experimental conditions and primers described in Supp Table 3. Furthermore, we independently screened NOTCH2 exon 34 in 145/175 SMZL, using primers from Rossi et al (14).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (v20). Time-to-first-treatment (TTFT), Event-free (EFS) and Overall survival (OS) as defined in the Supp Methods. Our cohort has 81% power to detect an Overall Survival 0.5 Hazard Ratio associated with NOTCH2 mutations present in 26% of patients (as observed (14)). Results were determined to be statistically significant at the 5% level.
Results
Overview of re-sequencing data
The mean re-sequencing depth across our gene panel was 297-fold (range 129-702). More than 85% of all bases were covered at >50-fold. The analysis described herein, focuses on the biological and clinical importance of key recurrently mutated genes (Figure 1A) known to be somatically acquired in SMZL based on previously published data (14-17,20-22). For our data on other gene mutations, whilst many are annotated in the COSMIC database they could not be confirmed as somatically acquired due to the lack of patient germ-line material and were not taken forward for analysis (Detailed in Supp Table 4). This lack of germ-line material is not unexpected in an international retrospective cohort of rare tumours such as SMZL.
Figure 1. Distribution of recurrent gene mutations across patients, gene mutation maps and gene by gene associations for 175 SMZL cases.
(A) Heatmap of the distribution of gene mutation in our cohort
(B) Schematic diagram of the protein targeted by key mutations in SMZL, with their key functional domains. The symbols and colour denote the type of mutation. Mutations annotated in COSMIC v68 database are in bold text.
(C) Associations between genetic and immunogenetic features of our SMZL cohort. Shows the pairwise associations amongst significantly mutated genes, genetic and immunogenetic features (labelled as ‘Genomic Feature’) across 175 SMZL cases. Genes are annotated within key pathways known to be important in the pathogenesis of mature B-cell malignancies. The number of mutations (n) for each gene mutation in the analysis is shown. An association is shaded based on the significance and only gene by genomic feature (top matrix) and gene by gene (bottom matrix) associations with a p-value of <0.01 (Chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test) or <0.001 (Mutation Relation Test, Genome MuSiC analysis) are included, respectively.
In our cohort, we identified recurrent mutations, at suitable frequency for accurate clinical correlations, in TP53 [n=26 cases], KLF2 [n=21], MLL2 [n=20], NOTCH2 [n=17], TNFAIP3 [n=13], MYD88 [n=12], ARID1A [n=10], NOTCH1 [n=10] and CREBBP [n=9] (Figure 1A and B, Supp Figure 1). For validation, we employed Sanger sequencing and confirmed the presence of 86/86 selected variants in these genes and we showed 99% concordance between our Haloplex and Sanger sequencing of NOTCH2 exon 34 (Supp Table 5). Furthermore, the Haloplex analysis of paired tumour/normal DNA samples [n=14], showed the presence of somatically acquired mutations in these genes [n=77] and, critically, no germ-line variants were identified in the genes we focus on herein (Supp Table 6). Therefore, our analytical data supports the somatic origin of mutations within these recurrent genes.
Mutation patterns and evolution
To obtain insight into the genomic context of these gene mutations, we submitted our data to two analytical packages. Firstly, we searched for pairwise gene correlations and mutually exclusive relationships between our ‘known somatic’ mutated genes using the mutation relation test (MRT, Genome Music) (23). There are 11 and 13 significant MRT co-occurring and mutually exclusive relationships between mutated genes, respectively (considering only relationships with P<0.001, Figure 1C), that demonstrated the following classes of gene mutation relationships: (1) a single and distinct independent gene mutation event, such as MYD88, where a mutation is invariably observed as an isolated event; (2) the presence of cancer drivers that have many mutually exclusive relationships, such as NOTCH2, TP53 and TNFAIP3, and (3) a group of genes such as KLF2 and ARID1A that have more co-occurring relationships, thus suggesting a synergistic function to promote tumorigenesis.
Secondly, we studied clonal evolution in SMZL, by differentiating between early, clonal events, and later, subclonal mutations. In order to do this, we initially performed integrative analysis of our Haloplex re-sequencing and SNP6 copy number data from our seven published WES SMZL cases (17), employing the ABSOLUTE algorithm (24) (Supp Figure 2). Using this approach, all our initial cases harboured a diploid genome, so we extended this analysis to include an additional 38 samples without copy number data but with purity information available from FACS analysis. Using this approach we were able to classify clonal or subclonal mutation in KLF2, NOTCH2, TP53, CREBBP and TNFAIP3 (Figure 2A and 2B).
Figure 2. Clonal distribution and temporal analysis of gene mutations in SMZL.
(A) Shows the distribution of the estimated proportion of tumour cells harbouring a mutation in 45 patients, based on the availability of purity information. Genes are displayed from left to right showing genes displaying more clonal and subclonal mutations, respectively, by using a binomial distribution based on the alternative allele read count, the total read count from cancer cells and an expected variant allelic fraction (VAF) of 0.45. For each gene, the bone-and-whisker plots show the adjusted ratio of observed VAF divided by the 50% of the purity estimate derived from CD19+ FACS data. The number of cases (n) for each gene mutation in the analysis is shown (bottom). (B) Shows the presence of clonal KLF2 mutations in five SMZL patients with matched deep re-sequencing and SNP6 data available. No KLF2 gene deletions were identified by SNP6 copy number data analysis. For each cases the cancer cell fraction (CCF) derived with the ABSOLUTE algorithm is shown for the KLF2 variant and co-occurring mutations. This approach estimates the cancer cell fraction (CCF) harbouring a mutation by correcting for sample purity and local copy number changes, where mutations are classified as clonal if the CCF was >0.95 with a probability >0.5, and subclonal otherwise (40). (C) Temporal re-sequencing analysis of sequential time points in cases showing clonal expansion of gene mutations (7 of 12 mutations in 9 patients). The Y-axis shows the VAF for a given mutation after accounting for tumour purity.
To extend this single time-point bioinformatics analysis, we also analysed a second DNA sample preceding or subsequent to SMZL diagnosis in 9 patients. For this analysis, we again only focused on variation in genes known to be targeted by somatic mutations in SMZL. We identified 12 variants, and after accounting for tumour purity, these data are outlined in Supp Table 1 and Figure 2C. Whilst the number of mutations per case was insufficient for comprehensive analysis, the following observations could be made: 1) 3 patients harboured mutations that remained fully clonal over the two timepoints (ARID1A [n=1] and CREBBP [n=2]) which supports the ABSOLUTE data for these genes, 2) 6 cases contained seven mutations where the normalized VAF increased over time, supporting the hypothesis that these genes are important in driving the disease, including four patients with TP53 mutations that acquire a deletion of 17p (isochromosomes 17q) at the second timepoint (Figure 2C), and 3) three patients displayed either a mutation that became undetectable at timepoint 2 (TNFAIP3 and NOTCH2), or one that remained at a low VAF (NOTCH2, 0.04% allele frequency), even with a concomitantly emerging TP53 mutation (Supp Table 1).
Biologically significant mutations in SMZL
KLF2, or Krüppel-like factor 2, mutations were detected in 21/175 cases (12%, Figure 1A) and were distributed across the entire protein, with a cluster in the C2H2 domain (C terminus). A Q24X variant was identified in three patients, suggesting the presence of mutation hotspots. Mutations were often (43%) stop-gains or frame-shift variants (Figure 1B), suggesting an impact on protein function. All mutations tested were somatically acquired (n=9). From our ABSOLUTE analysis, all 11 mutations were defined as clonal (Figure 2B), and other recurrently mutated genes present in these cases were estimated to have lower CCFs than KLF2 (e.g. NOTCH2 and TNFAIP3, Figure 2B). KLF2 mutations were significantly associated with del(7q) (53% vs. 11%; P=0.001), IGHV1-2*04 gene usage (50% vs. 7%; P<0.001), and gene mutations including NOTCH2, TNFAIP3 and ARID1A (all P<0.001). Together, these observations suggest that the potential cell survival advantage provided by an early KLF2 mutation allows the acquisition of additional functionally synergistic gene mutations to promote tumourigenesis (Figure 1C).
We independently screened NOTCH2 by Haloplex (mean gene coverage of 572-fold) and direct Sanger sequencing of exon 34, and identified 18 mutations in 17 patients, a frequency of 10% in our cohort (Figure 1A). We manually examined the NOTCH2 sequence reads and found no evidence of any additional mutations below the resolution of our variant calling algorithm. As expected, the mutations were nonsense [n=9], frameshift [n=7] and missense [n=2] principally targeting the TAD and PEST domain encoded by exon 34 (Figure 1B). Several of our mutations (R2360*, R2400*) have been previously reported to result in over-expression of the Notch2 protein and active signalling (14). NOTCH2 mutations were classified as sub-clonal or clonal (Figure 2A). We also identified NOTCH1 mutations [n=10], several of which were truncating frameshift indels [n=2, P2514fs*4] or stopgain mutations [n=2] in exon 34.
We identified recurrent mutations in MYD88 [12/175 cases, 7%] and TNFAIP3 [13/175 cases, 7%], genes involved in Toll-like receptor and NF-κB signalling. Of the 12 MYD88 mutations, 7 and 2 were the gain-of-function L265P or S219C variants, respectively (25). Mutations in MYD88 were single and distinct events, mutually exclusive from mutations in TP53 and NOTCH2. Twenty-one TNFAIP3 mutations were identified in 13 patients (Figure 1B), 15 of which would result in truncation of the A20 protein. One of these mutations (E361X) has been shown to abrogate the ability of A20 to negatively regulate NFKB-signalling (26). Mutations co-existed with KLF2 (P<0.001) mutations but showed a reverse association with NOTCH2 (P<0.001) and TP53 (P<0.001).
Mutations of TP53 and ARID1A, both involved in cell cycle control and DNA damage response, were identified in 26/175 (16%) and 10/175 (6%) patients, respectively. We defined 28 missense [n=18], nonsense [n=5], frameshift [n=2] and splicing [n=3] TP53 mutations, largely annotated in COSMIC (27/28, Figure 1B), in 26 patients who tended to have deletions of 17p (P=0.003) and a complex karyotype (P<0.001, Figure 1C). Finally, we confirm our previous study by demonstrating recurrent mutations in CREBBP [n=9] (17). All our CREBBP mutations appear to be early genetic events as they were classified as fully clonal (Figure 2A) akin to the situation in follicular lymphoma (27); two of our mutations were the Y1450C variant previously identified in DLBCL, which has been shown to compromise the protein’s ability to acetylate BCL6 and p53 (28).
Clinical significance of mutations in SMZL
Initially we looked for associations between gene mutations and clinical and laboratory features measured routinely in clinical practice (Figure 3A). Patients with KLF2 and NOTCH2 mutations were at higher risk of receiving treatment including splenectomy (OR=4.51, 95%CI 1.68-12.10; P=0.002 & OR=1.16, 95%CI 1.08-1.25; P=0.007). Histological evidence of transformation to large B-cell lymphoma was reported in 19/175 (11%) patients; these patients were more likely to have 100% germline IGHV gene identity (40% vs. 10%, P=0.04) and exhibited a significantly shorter overall survival (9.0 vs 16.5 yrs; P=0.04) in comparison to non-transformed cases. The only mutated gene associated with transformation was TNFAIP3 (32% vs. 4%, P=0.002).
Figure 3. The clinical significance of gene mutations in SMZL.
(A) Shows the associations between the presence of gene mutations and clinical features. Where possible genes are annotated within key pathways known to be important in the pathogenesis of mature B-cell malignancies. The number of mutations (n) for each gene mutation in the analysis is shown. An association is shaded based on the significance and only associations with a p-value of <0.05 are included (Chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test). (B) and (C) show KM plots for time to first treatment for patients with KLF2 and NOTCH2 mutations, respectively. (D) and (E) show overall survival KM plots for patients with TP53 and MYD88 mutations, respectively. For each KM Plot, the grey and black lines identify the wild-type and mutated patient groups, respectively. The P values are derived from Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test and median survival times with 95% confidence intervals.
Follow-up outcome data were available for 164, 117 and 169 patients for TTFT, EFS and OS, respectively. First, we demonstrated the clinical relevance of our cohort by testing for the prognostic significance of previously documented clinical and laboratory features (Table 2). We then performed univariate analysis of the gene mutations against TTFT, EFS and OS (Table 2). Genes associated with reduced TTFT were; 1) KLF2 (HR 1.93, 95%CI 1.16-3.32, P=0.01) where wild-type and mutant patients exhibited median TTFT of 1.11 and 0.12 years, respectively, and 2) NOTCH2 (HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.26-3.58, P=0.003) where wild-type and mutant patients exhibited median TTFT of 0.94 and 0.09 years, respectively (Figure 3B and C). Gene mutations associated with shorter EFS included TP53 (HR 2.17, 95%CI 1-4.74, P=0.05) with median EFS of 3.11 and 0.98 years for wild-type and mutated patients, respectively. Finally, we tested the impact of gene mutations on OS and showed reduced survival for TP53 (HR 2.16, 95%CI 1.05-4.42, P=0.032) mutations with a median OS of 12.21 and 16.03 years for mutant and wild-type cases, respectively, and the reverse for MYD88 mutated individuals (HR 0.04, 95%CI 0.01-2.48, P=0.02) (Figure 3D and E).
Table 2. Univariate survival analysis of recurrently mutated genes.
Variable | Description | Total | Events | Median (yrs) | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTFT | KLF2 | mutated | 20 | 18 | 0.12 | 0.0-0.24 | 1.93 | 1.16-3.23 | 0.01 |
unmutated | 140 | 100 | 1.11 | 0.0-2.28 | |||||
NOTCH2 | mutated | 17 | 17 | 0.09 | 0.0-0.22 | 2.13 | 1.26-3.58 | 0.003 | |
unmutated | 143 | 101 | 0.94 | 0.0-2.03 | |||||
Hb | <12 g/dl | 70 | 63 | 0.1 | 0.04-0.17 | 2.75 | 1.87-4.02 | <0.001 | |
>12 g/dl | 84 | 51 | 2.73 | 0.0-7.14 | |||||
Lymphocytes | <4 × 109/l | 40 | 33 | 0.15 | 0.07-0.24 | 1.76 | 1.16-2.68 | 0.007 | |
>4 × 109/l | 101 | 69 | 1.43 | 0.50-2.37 | |||||
IGHV identity | 100% | 12 | 11 | 0.14 | 0.0-0.38 | 2.06 | 1.07-3.74 | 0.027 | |
< 100% | 78 | 50 | 1.98 | 0.98-2.99 | |||||
EFS | TP53 | mutated | 15 | 8 | 0.98 | 0.04-12.22 | 2.17 | 1.00-4.74 | 0.05 |
unmutated | 84 | 32 | 3.11 | 2.35-6.20 | |||||
Age | >65 yrs | 53 | 26 | 6.82a | 4.45-9.20 | 2.09 | 1.07-4.08 | 0.028 | |
<65 yrs | 45 | 14 | 12.69a | 9.19-16.18 | |||||
Platelet count | < 100 × 109/l | 19 | 11 | 2.92 | 2.03-3.80 | 1.99 | 0.98-4.02 | 0.052 | |
> 100 × 109/l | 78 | 28 | 6.91 | 4.47-9.34 | |||||
OS | TP53 | mutated | 26 | 10 | 12.21 | 5.28-19.14 | 2.16 | 1.05-4.43 | 0.032 |
unmutated | 134 | 33 | 16.03 | 14.64-17.43 | |||||
MYD88 | mutated | 12 | 0 | -b | -b | -c | -c | 0.02 d | |
unmutated | 148 | 43 | - | ||||||
Age | >65 yrs | 103 | 37 | 10.36a | 9.0-11.76 | 6.37 | 2.55-15.87 | <0.001 | |
<65 yrs | 56 | 6 | 22.65a | 19.38-25.91 | |||||
Hb | <12 g/dl | 68 | 24 | 9.01 | 2.90-15.12 | 2.69 | 1.45-4.99 | 0.001 | |
>12 g/dl | 87 | 18 | 16.35 | 14.99-17.70 |
Footnote: Log-Rank P-values.
Mean survival value as median not reached.
No events in MYD88 mutated cases and median survival times not presented, follow-up time ranged from 1.25 to 19.9 years.
HR and 95% CI cannot be reliable calculated as there are no events in MYD88 mutated group.
Log-Rank P-value for Chi-squared value reported for the MYD88 OS Kaplan-Meier analysis (See Figure 3E).
NOTCH2 and TP53 mutations were independent risk factors for reduced TTFT and OS
Those gene mutations shown to be associated with reduced outcome in univariate analysis were tested using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. Along with the presence of gene mutations, other variables included in the analysis were age at diagnosis, haemoglobin levels, platelets and lymphocyte counts. We developed these models for TTFT, EFS and OS as they permitted the relative prognostic value of gene mutations to be assessed in a large, informative group of patients in the context of the most available clinical data (Table 3). Our multivariate EFS model identified age at diagnosis, lymphocyte count and low platelet count as independent risk factors, however TP53 became non-significant in this analysis. We show that in addition to haemoglobin levels, both NOTCH2 (HR 2.12, 95%CI 1.02-4.4, P=0.044) and 100% germline IGHV gene identify (HR 2.19, 95%CI 1.05-4.55, P=0.036) are independent risk factors for TTFT. Furthermore, we show that the presence of TP53 mutation is an independent risk factor for OS (HR 2.36, 95%CI 1.08-5.20, P=0.03).
Table 3. Multivariate survival analysis of recurrently mutated genes.
Variable | TTFT | ||
---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | P-Value | |
Hb<12g/dl | 2.28 | 1.32-3.96 | 0.003 |
IGHV 100% identity | 2.19 | 1.05-4.55 | 0.036 |
NOTCH2 | 2.12 | 1.02-4.40 | 0.044 |
EFS | |||
HR | 95% CI | P-Value | |
Plts<100×109L | 3.75 | 1.68-8.41 | 0.001 |
Lymphocytes <4×109L | 0.41 | 0.17-0.96 | 0.04 |
Age at diagnosis <65yrs | 0.45 | 0.21-0.96 | 0.038 |
OS | |||
HR | 95% CI | P-Value | |
Hb<12gdl | 2.18 | 1.12-4.23 | 0.02 |
Lymphocytes <4×109L | 2.35 | 1.11-4.97 | 0.03 |
Age at diagnosis <65yrs | 0.09 | 0.03-0.27 | <0.001 |
TP53 | 2.36 | 1.08-5.20 | 0.03 |
Footnote: TTFT Multivariate: 83 cases with 56 events; 92 cases with missing data. EFS Multivariate: 82 cases with 35 events; 93 cases with missing data. OS Multivariate: 134 cases with 38 events; 38 cases with missing data. Backwards-step regression was employed, including the following clinical variables (Hb<12gdl, Plts<100×109L, Lymphocytes <4×109L, Age at diagnosis <65yrs) and the representative gene status variables significantly associated with treatment, event and survival outcome in univariate analysis (Table 2). The TTFT model also included IGHV 100% identity, KLF2 and NOTCH2 mutation status. EFS and OS also included TP53 mutation status. Variables removed from the backwards-step regression are not shown.
Discussion
The primary aim of this study was to determine the clinical significance of somatically acquired gene mutations in SMZL, identified in the current and previously reported studies (14-17,22). Notably, we were able to identify key associations between gene mutations and clinical outcome, demonstrating for the first time that NOTCH2 and TP53 gene mutations are independent markers of poor outcome.
The main strengths of the present study were the cost-effective resequencing approach which enabled screening of a large number of candidate genes at high sequencing depth and, most importantly, the size of the cohort in a rare lymphoma, enabling us to overcome limitations befalling previous studies evaluating the clinical significance of clinical and genetic biomarkers in SMZL. Indeed, the lack of a treatment naïve clinical trial cohort, historical use of splenectomy for diagnosis, inclusion of non-splenectomised cases who might have SLLU and the indolent nature of the disease, where in an elderly population many patients die from unrelated causes, all underline the need for caution in interpreting outcome data in SMZL. We sought to minimize the effect of these factors in a number of ways: (1) by confining the study to centres with expertise in SMZL, we could ensure expert diagnostic review especially for cases diagnosed prior to the currently-accepted diagnostic criteria, (2) treatments included a limited range of modalities, predominantly splenectomy, alkylating agents and rituximab, and splenectomy was considered to be a therapy regardless of the indication (Supp Table 7), and (3) the use of multiple survival endpoints enabled the impact of prognostic markers on disease biology as well as the overall survival of an elderly patient cohort to be assessed.
In additional to confirming the presence of mutations in TP53, and in genes involved in NOTCH, BcR, TLR, NF-κB signaling and in chromatin modifiers (14-17,22), we identified recurrent heterozygous inactivating mutations in KLF2, a member of the Krüppel-like family of transcription factors with roles in cell differentiation, proliferation, activation and trafficking (29), in 12% of analyzed cases. KLF2 was included in our re-sequencing experiments due to reanalysis of our published WES data (17), that showed evidence of mutations in 4/7 cases in spite of the low sequence read-depth present at this locus. During the preparation and submission of this manuscript, two studies independently identified recurrent KLF2 mutations in SMZL, at a frequency higher than in our study (22,30), which is likely to be a reflection of the patient cohort analyzed in our current study, as we identified a lower frequency of del(7q) and IGHV1-2*04 in our cohort, compared to other large studies (3,22). Interestingly, in mice, KLF2 deficiency is associated with a failure to maintain B-1 B cells, expansion of the marginal zone B-cell pool and expression of marginal zone characteristics by follicular B cells (31-33). These observations may reasonably be considered as indicating a role of KLF2 mutations in the natural history of SMZL, an argument also supported by their significant enrichment among SMZL cases with clonotypic BcR utilizing the IGHV1-2*04 gene. This alludes to acquisition and/or selection of KLF2 mutations in a context of particular signaling via specific BCRs with distinctive immunogenetic features, similar to what has been observed in other B-cell malignancies, most notably in stereotyped subsets of CLL (34). In 11 cases we were able to study the clonal architecture of KLF2 mutations: in each case the KLF2 mutations were clonal and were associated with other subclonal mutations, often involving other clinically significant genes such as NOTCH2 and TNFAIP3. The invariable association of clonal KLF2 mutations with other mutations involving different pathways, and deletions of 7q suggests that the former may have a pro-survival function and additional mutations may be necessary for disease progression. It will be of interest to determine the incidence of KLF2 mutations and genomic complexity in cases of clonal B-lymphocytosis of marginal-zone origin (CBL-MZ) (19), especially in those cases progressing to SMZL.
Consistent with the role of the NOTCH2-Delta-like 1 ligand pathway in normal marginal zone development (35), and the previously reported finding of NOTCH2 mutations in SMZL (14,15), we found recurrent mutations in exon 34 of NOTCH2 in 10% of cases. This compares to an incidence of 21% (14), 25% (15) and 7% (16) in previously reported series, probably reflecting differences in sample size and cohort composition. We also detected recurrent mutations in other NOTCH pathway genes including NOTCH 3 and 4 and SPEN. However, their role in the pathogenesis of SMZL is unclear so we have not focused on them specifically.
We evaluated the prognostic significance of somatically acquired mutations on TTFT, EFS and OS. Short TTFT was associated with mutations in KLF2, NOTCH2 and ARID1A; short EFS with mutations in TP53; and, short OS with mutations in TP53, whereas MYD88 mutations were associated with a longer OS. Although the study by Rossi et al indicated that NOTCH2 mutations were associated with a prolonged 5-year OS and progression-free survival following first line treatment (14), our data based on a substantially larger cohort shows that NOTCH2 mutation are linked to reduced outcome, an observation corroborated by Kiel et al who also noted an association with shorter time from diagnosis to either relapse, transformation or death, albeit in a much smaller cohort of SMZL cases [n=46] (15). Additional studies of larger patient cohorts will be required to validate the clinical importance of NOTCH2 mutations. Cases with a MYD88 mutation exhibited longer OS and comparable clinical and laboratory features to other cases with SMZL apart from a higher incidence of low level IgM paraproteins, detected in 8/9 cases with available data. The poor prognostic significance of TP53 mutations is consistent with previously reported data on TP53 abnormalities.
Our multivariate analysis demonstrated for the first time in SMZL that both genetic and immunogenetic parameters retained prognostic significance in a model that included age, haemoglobin, platelet count and lymphocyte count. We chose to base our multivariate analysis on the study of Salido et al, as this is the only large study to include base-line clinical variables with chromosomal features (3). While the independent prognostic significance of age, anaemia and thrombocytopenia were expected and consistent with many previous studies, the biological basis for the impact of a lymphocyte count of < 4×109/l, noted in an early (36) but not in more recent studies (3,37), requires further investigation. Interestingly, our study suggests that gene mutations, such as those targeting NOTCH2 and TP53 have more clinical utility than cytogenetic features, such as karyotypic complexity, 14q aberrations and TP53 deletions that did not retain prognostic significance in previous reports (3). Specifically, NOTCH2 and truly unmutated IGHV genes (but not unmutated IGHV genes using a 98% cut-off) were independent markers of TTFT and TP53 of OS. Given the historical use of splenectomy to both diagnose and treat SMZL patients, our associations with TTFT should be considered with a note of caution.
Since transformation to a high grade lymphoma is usually associated with resistance to treatment and very poor survival, we were also interested to see if any genomic abnormalities were associated with an increased risk of transformation, as noted for NOTCH1 mutations in CLL (38). In our study, TNFAIP3 mutations together with truly unmutated clonotypic IGHV genes were all found at a higher frequency in cases that subsequently transformed. Further studies comparing the genomic landscape of paired chronic phase and clonally-related transformed samples, as performed in CLL and FL (27,39), will be required to determine the drivers of transformation.
In summary, we show that gene mutations and immunogenetic features have prognostic significance in a large and well-characterized cohort of patients with SMZL. Additional studies will be required to confirm our findings and to determine the functional consequences of these mutations, the incidence and importance of copy number and epigenetic abnormalities in gene silencing and the clinical value of mutation screening in the differential diagnosis and management of SMZL.
Supplementary Material
Statement of Translational Relevance.
This multinational study identifies genomic and immunogenetic factors with prognostic significance in splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), a rare B cell non Hodgkins lymphoma. Genomic mutations in TP53, KLF2, NOTCH2 and TNFAIP3 were found collectively in over 40% of cases and 13% utilised IGHV genes with no somatic hypermutation (SHM). TNFAIP3 mutations were associated with an increased risk of high grade transformation. IGHV genes lacking SHM, KLF2 and NOTCH2 mutations were associated with shorter time to first treatment, while TP53 and MYD88 mutations were predictors of short and long overall survival, respectively. In contrast to cytogenetic and FISH data, NOTCH2 and TP53 mutations remained independent factors of outcome in multivariate analyses which included the established prognostic markers: anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Genomic and immunogenetic data have the potential to aid diagnosis, and influence the timing and choice of treatment in SMZL.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge all patients who contributed to this study. The authors would also like to thank Professor Nick Cross for help during the preparation of this manuscript.
Grant Support This work was funded by Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research, the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund, Cancer Research UK, Wessex Medical Research, the Bournemouth Leukaemia Fund, the Swedish Cancer Society and the Swedish Research Council.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
- 1.Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Fourth Edition World Health Organization; Lyon, France: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bikos V, Darzentas N, Hadzidimitriou A, Davis Z, Hockley S, Traverse-Glehen A, et al. Over 30% of patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma express the same immunoglobulin heavy variable gene: ontogenetic implications. Leukemia. 2012;26(7):1638–46. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salido M, Baró C, Oscier D, Stamatopoulos K, Dierlamm J, Matutes E, et al. Cytogenetic aberrations and their prognostic value in a series of 330 splenic marginal zone B-cell lymphomas: a multicenter study of the Splenic B-Cell Lymphoma Group. Blood. 2010;116(9):1479–88. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-267476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kalpadakis C, Pangalis GA, Angelopoulou MK, Sachanas S, Kontopidou FN, Yiakoumis X, et al. Treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma with rituximab monotherapy: progress report and comparison with splenectomy. Oncologist. 2013;18(2):190–7. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lenglet J, Traullé C, Mounier N, Benet C, Munoz-Bongrand N, Amorin S, et al. Long-term follow-up analysis of 100 patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma treated with splenectomy as first-line treatment. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55(8):1854–60. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.861067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Montalbán C, Abraira V, Arcaini L, Domingo-Domenech E, Guisado-Vasco P, Iannitto E, et al. Risk stratification for Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma based on haemoglobin concentration, platelet count, high lactate dehydrogenase level and extrahilar lymphadenopathy: development and validation on 593 cases. Br J Haematol. 2013;159(2):164–71. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Montalban C, Abraira V, Arcaini L, Domingo-Domenech E, Guisado-Vasco P, Iannitto E, et al. Simplification of risk stratification for splenic marginal zone lymphoma: a point-based score for practical use. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013 doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.818143. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arcaini L, Lazzarino M, Colombo N, Burcheri S, Boveri E, Paulli M, et al. Splenic marginal zone lymphoma: a prognostic model for clinical use. Blood. 2006;107(12):4643–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Algara P, Mateo MS, Sanchez-Beato M, Mollejo M, Navas IC, Romero L, et al. Analysis of the IgV(H) somatic mutations in splenic marginal zone lymphoma defines a group of unmutated cases with frequent 7q deletion and adverse clinical course. Blood. 2002;99(4):1299–304. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.4.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gruszka-Westwood AM, Hamoudi RA, Matutes E, Tuset E, Catovsky D. p53 abnormalities in splenic lymphoma with villous lymphocytes. Blood. 2001;97(11):3552–8. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.11.3552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fresquet V, Robles EF, Parker A, Martinez-Useros J, Mena M, Malumbres R, et al. High-throughput sequencing analysis of the chromosome 7q32 deletion reveals IRF5 as a potential tumour suppressor in splenic marginal-zone lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2012;158(6):712–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09226.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hockley SL, Else M, Morilla A, Wotherspoon A, Dearden C, Catovsky D, et al. The prognostic impact of clinical and molecular features in hairy cell leukaemia variant and splenic marginal zone lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2012;158(3):347–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rinaldi A, Mian M, Chigrinova E, Arcaini L, Bhagat G, Novak U, et al. Genome-wide DNA profiling of marginal zone lymphomas identifies subtype-specific lesions with an impact on the clinical outcome. Blood. 2011;117(5):1595–604. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rossi D, Trifonov V, Fangazio M, Bruscaggin A, Rasi S, Spina V, et al. The coding genome of splenic marginal zone lymphoma: activation of NOTCH2 and other pathways regulating marginal zone development. J Exp Med. 2012;209(9):1537–51. doi: 10.1084/jem.20120904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kiel MJ, Velusamy T, Betz BL, Zhao L, Weigelin HG, Chiang MY, et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic NOTCH2 mutations in splenic marginal zone lymphoma. J Exp Med. 2012;209(9):1553–65. doi: 10.1084/jem.20120910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martínez N, Almaraz C, Vaqué JP, Varela I, Derdak S, Beltran S, et al. Whole-exome sequencing in splenic marginal zone lymphoma reveals mutations in genes involved in marginal zone differentiation. Leukemia. 2014 doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.365. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Parry M, Rose-Zerilli MJ, Gibson J, Ennis S, Walewska R, Forster J, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies novel recurrently mutated genes in patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Matutes E, Oscier D, Montalban C, Berger F, Callet-Bauchu E, Dogan A, et al. Splenic marginal zone lymphoma proposals for a revision of diagnostic, staging and therapeutic criteria. Leukemia. 2008;22(3):487–95. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2405068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xochelli A, Kalpadakis C, Gardiner A, Baliakas P, Vassilakopoulos TP, Mould S, et al. Clonal B-cell lymphocytosis exhibiting immunophenotypic features consistent with a marginal zone origin: is this a distinct entity? Blood. 2013 doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-515155. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rossi D, Deaglio S, Dominguez-Sola D, Rasi S, Vaisitti T, Agostinelli C, et al. Alteration of BIRC3 and multiple other NF-κB pathway genes in splenic marginal zone lymphoma. Blood. 2011;118(18):4930–4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-359166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Novak U, Rinaldi A, Kwee I, Nandula SV, Rancoita PM, Compagno M, et al. The NF-{kappa}B negative regulator TNFAIP3 (A20) is inactivated by somatic mutations and genomic deletions in marginal zone lymphomas. Blood. 2009;113(20):4918–21. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-174110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Piva R, Deaglio S, Famà R, Buonincontri R, Scarfò I, Bruscaggin A, et al. The krüppel-like factor 2 transcription factor gene is recurrently mutated in splenic marginal zone lymphoma. Leukemia. 2014 doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.294. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dees ND, Zhang Q, Kandoth C, Wendl MC, Schierding W, Koboldt DC, et al. MuSiC: identifying mutational significance in cancer genomes. Genome Res. 2012;22(8):1589–98. doi: 10.1101/gr.134635.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Carter SL, Cibulskis K, Helman E, McKenna A, Shen H, Zack T, et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat Biotech. 2012;30(5):413–21. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ngo VN, Young RM, Schmitz R, Jhavar S, Xiao W, Lim KH, et al. Oncogenically active MYD88 mutations in human lymphoma. Nature. 2011;470(7332):115–9. doi: 10.1038/nature09671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Honma K, Tsuzuki S, Nakagawa M, Tagawa H, Nakamura S, Morishima Y, et al. TNFAIP3/A20 functions as a novel tumor suppressor gene in several subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood. 2009;114(12):2467–75. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Okosun J, Bödör C, Wang J, Araf S, Yang CY, Pan C, et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies recurrent mutations and evolution patterns driving the initiation and progression of follicular lymphoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(2):176–81. doi: 10.1038/ng.2856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pasqualucci L, Dominguez-Sola D, Chiarenza A, Fabbri G, Grunn A, Trifonov V, et al. Inactivating mutations of acetyltransferase genes in B-cell lymphoma. Nature. 2011;471(7337):189–95. doi: 10.1038/nature09730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pearson R, Fleetwood J, Eaton S, Crossley M, Bao S. Kruppel-like transcription factors: A functional family. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40:1996–2001. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clipson A, Wang M, de Leval L, Ashton-Key M, Wotherspoon A, Vassiliou G, et al. KLF2 mutation is the most frequent somatic change in splenic marginal zone lymphoma and identifies a subset with distinct genotype. Leukemia. 2015 doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.330. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hart GT, Wang X, Hogquist KA, Jameson SC. Krüppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) regulates B-cell reactivity, subset differentiation, and trafficking molecule expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(2):716–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013168108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hoek KL, Gordy LE, Collins PL, Parekh VV, Aune TM, Joyce S, et al. Follicular B cell trafficking within the spleen actively restricts humoral immune responses. Immunity. 2010;33(2):254–65. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hart GT, Peery SL, Hamilton SE, Jameson SC. Cutting edge: Krüppel-like factor 2 is required for phenotypic maintenance but not development of B1 B cells. J Immunol. 2012;189(7):3293–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Strefford JC, Sutton LA, Baliakas P, Agathangelidis A, Malc̆íková J, Plevova K, et al. Distinct patterns of novel gene mutations in poor-prognostic stereotyped subsets of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the case of SF3B1 and subset #2. Leukemia. 2013;27(11):2196–9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Saito T, Chiba S, Ichikawa M, Kunisato A, Asai T, Shimizu K, et al. Notch2 is preferentially expressed in mature B cells and indispensable for marginal zone B lineage development. Immunity. 2003;18(5):675–85. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00111-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Troussard X, Valensi F, Duchayne E, Garand R, Felman P, Tulliez M, et al. Splenic lymphoma with villous lymphocytes: clinical presentation, biology and prognostic factors in a series of 100 patients. Groupe Francais d’Hématologie Cellulaire (GFHC). Br J Haematol. 1996;93(3):731–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1711.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Parry-Jones N, Matutes E, Gruszka-Westwood AM, Swansbury GJ, Wotherspoon AC, Catovsky D. Prognostic features of splenic lymphoma with villous lymphocytes: a report on 129 patients. Br J Haematol. 2003;120(5):759–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04165.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Algrin C, Brisou G, Beldjord K, Mounier N, Berger F, Baseggio L, et al. Prognostic Impact Of Somatic NOTCH2 Mutation In Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma Blood - ASH Abstracts. 2013;122(21):4247. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fabbri G, Khiabanian H, Holmes AB, Wang J, Messina M, Mullighan CG, et al. Genetic lesions associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia transformation to Richter syndrome. J Exp Med. 2013;210(11):2273–88. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Landau DA, Carter SL, Stojanov P, McKenna A, Stevenson K, Lawrence MS, et al. Evolution and impact of subclonal mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cell. 2013;152(4):714–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.