Abstract
We report the draft genome sequence of Jiangella alkaliphila KCTC 19222T, isolated from cave soil in Jeju, Republic of Korea. This genome sequence, together with the previously sequenced J. gansuensis strain DSM 44835T, identified from a desert environmental source, will give us a better understanding of the school of “evolutionary taxonomy.”
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Jiangella alkaliphila, which belongs to the genus Jiangella, is an aerobic, Gram-positive, halotolerant filamentous actinomycete with a high G+C content (1). The genus Jiangella was first identified by Song et al. in 2005 (2), including four haloduric species currently on the List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (3). This taxon originally belonged to the family Nocardioidaceae within the suborder Propionibacterineae (2) and was finally placed in the family Jiangellaceae of the order Jiangellales under the class Actinobacteria (4). However, its position in the phylogenetic tree is still unstable in the actinobacterial areas using 16S rRNA information. We sequenced the genome of the type strain Jiangella alkaliphila KCTC 19222T while considering that members of this group have been isolated from different environments (1, 2, 5, 6). This genome was compared with the previously sequenced Jiangella gansuensis DSM 44835T, which will provide further insight into the adaptation of these strains to different habitats and a better understanding of the school of “evolutionary taxonomy” (7).
Whole-genome sequencing of Jiangella alkaliphila strain KCTC 19222T was completed using a paired-end sequencing method with the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA); 1.76 Gb of data were produced, and 8,488,890 reads were used to assemble the daft genome by the SOAPdenovo2 package (8). The draft genome size of J. alkaliphila is 7,567,836 bp in 124 scaffolds, with an average length of 61,031 bp and an N50 scaffold length of 169,179 bp. Its G+C content is 72.18% according to the genome. Genes were predicted using Glimmer version 3.02 (9). The tRNAs and rRNAs were identified by tRNAscan-SE version 1.23 (10) and RNAmmer version 1.2 (11). About 7,238 protein-coding genes, 47 tRNAs, and 4 rRNAs were predicted from this assembly. The predicted coding sequences (CDSs) were translated and used to search against the KEGG and COG databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein.
The average nucleotide identity (ANI) was calculated between the genome sequences of J. alkaliphila KCTC 19222T and J. gansuensis DSM 44835T using the JSpecies software (http://www.imedea.uib.es/jspecies) (12) based on the BLAST method (ANIb) and the MUMer algorithm (ANIm). The result shows that the ANI values between J. alkaliphila and J. gansuensis were below 85.3%, which confirmed that J. alkaliphila was a new species belonging to the genus Jiangella, since ANI values of 95 to 96% correspond to the 70% DDH cutoff point recommended by Wayne et al. (13) for the delineation of bacterial species (14).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number LBMC00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, LBMC01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the Shenzhen New Strategic Industry Special Fund (grant CXZZ20120618172226337) and by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of the Korean government (grant NRF-2013M3A9A5076601). W.-J.L. was also supported by the Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Guangdong Province Higher Vocational Colleges and Schools Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2014).
Footnotes
Citation Jiao J-Y, Liu L, Park D-J, Kim C-J, Xiao M, Chen J, Li L, Zhong J-M, Zhao J, Li W-J. 2015. Draft genome sequence of Jiangella alkaliphila KCTC 19222T, isolated from cave soil in Jeju, Republic of Korea. Genome Announc 3(4):e00721-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00721-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Lee SD. 2008. Jiangella alkaliphila sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from a cave. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1176–1179. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65479-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Song L, Li WJ, Wang QL, Chen GZ, Zhang YS, Xu LH. 2005. Jiangella gansuensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel actinomycete from a desert soil in north-west China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:881–884. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63353-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parte AC. 2014. LPSN—list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D613–D616. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goodfellow M. 2012. Class I: Actinobacteria. In Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Kreig NR, Staley JT (ed), Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 1, 2nd ed. Springer Verlag, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Qin S, Zhao GZ, Li J, Zhu WY, Xu LH, Li WJ. 2009. Jiangella alba sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the stem of Maytenus austroyunnanensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:2162–2165. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.009001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kämpfer P, Schäfer J, Lodders N, Martin K. 2011. Jiangella muralis sp. nov., from an indoor environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:128–131. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.022277-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Klenk HP, Göker M. 2010. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol 33:175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Pan Q, Liu Y, Tang J, Wu G, Zhang H, Shi Y, Liu Y, Yu C, Wang B, Lu Y, Han C, Cheung DW, Yiu SM, Peng S, Xiaoqian Z, Liu G, Liao X, Li Y, Yang H, Wang J, Lam TW, Wang J. 2012. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience 1:18. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O, Krichevsky MI, Moore LH, Moore WEC, Murray RGE, Stackebrandt E, Starr MP, Trüper HG. 1987. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464. doi: 10.1099/00207713-37-4-463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arahal DR. 2014. Whole-genome analyses: average nucleotide identity, p 103–122. In Goodfellow M, Sutcliffe I, Chun J (ed), Methods in microbiology, vol 41: new approaches to prokaryotic systematics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. doi: 10.1016/bs.mim.2014.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
