Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Jul 2;3(4):e00729-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00729-15

Draft Genome Sequences of Vibrio alginolyticus Strains V1 and V2, Opportunistic Marine Pathogens

Daniel Castillo a, Paul D’Alvise b, Panos G Kalatzis c, Constantina Kokkari c, Mathias Middelboe a, Lone Gram b, Siyang Liu d, Pantelis Katharios c,
PMCID: PMC4490852  PMID: 26139724

Abstract

We announce the draft genome sequences of Vibrio alginolyticus strains V1 and V2, isolated from juvenile Sparus aurata and Dentex dentex, respectively, during outbreaks of vibriosis. The genome sequences are 5,257,950 bp with a G+C content of 44.5% for V. alginolyticus V1 and 5,068,299 bp with a G+C content of 44.8% for strain V2. These genomes provide further insights into the putative virulence factors, prophage carriage, and evolution of this opportunistic marine pathogen.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Vibrio alginolyticus is a Gram-negative bacterium and an important opportunistic pathogen for marine organisms (1). This bacterium is associated with epidemic vibriosis, which results in high mortality for cultured marine animals, including fish (2), shellfish (3) and shrimp (4). In addition, V. alginolyticus can be pathogenic in humans and can lead to otitis and wound infections after contact with V. alginolyticus-containing seawater (5). We report the draft genome sequences of V. alginolyticus strains V1 and V2, which were isolated from farmed juvenile Sparus aurata and Dentex dentex, respectively, during two separate vibriosis incidences in Crete, Greece.

V. alginolyticus strains V1 and V2 were grown in Luria broth (Mo Bio, 12106-05) supplemented with NaCl 1.7% overnight at 22°C with agitation. Genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s protocol. A sequencing library was prepared using an Illumina HiSeq platform (BGI, China) with pair-end read sizes of 100 bp. A total of 9,374,944 paired-end reads for strain V1 and 10,880,660 paired-end reads for strain V2, were used for de novo assembly in Geneious version 7.1.7 (http://www.geneious.com). Short and low-coverage contigs were filtered out, resulting in a set of 80 with an average coverage of 129× (N50, 265 kbp), and 33 contigs with a coverage of 137× (N50, 340.4 kbp) for V. alginolyticus strains V1 and V2, respectively. Annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP) (6). Additionally, the genomes were analyzed on the Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (7). Genome comparison was achieved using Mauve version 2.4.0 (8). Acquired antibiotic resistance genes were identified using ResFinder version 2.1 (9), virulence factors by virulencefinder version 1.2 (10), and prophages by PHAST (11).

The final assembly for V. alginolyticus strain V1 had a total length of 5,255,839 bp and a G+C content of 44.5%. Genome annotation resulted in 4,614 coding sequences (CDSs), 67 tRNAs, 59 pseudogenes, and 5 rRNAs. V. alginolyticus strain V2 had a total length of 5,068,299 bp and a G+C content of 44.8%. Genome annotation resulted in 4,448 CDSs, 77 tRNAs, 42 pseudogenes, and 4 rRNAs. Prophage screening for V. alginolyticus strain V1 displayed four phage-related sequences of 9.3, 14, 16.5, and 34.9 kb. Similarly, V. alginolyticus strain V2 had four phage-related sequences of 8.6, 11.5, 20.7, and 30 kb. V. alginolyticus strain V1 possesses two unique regions associated to drug resistance and transport of iron. For both strains, putative virulence factors were identified with functions such as adhesion and destruction of tissues (collagenases, arylsulfatases, proteases, and hemolysin), ABC-type transport systems (spermidine, putrescine, iron), and toxins (RTX, YafQ), which may facilitate specific pathogenicities of V. alginolyticus in different environments. No antibiotics resistant genes were detected.

Thus, these genome sequences can facilitate future comprehensive comparison and phylogenetic analyses aiming toward more efficient control of this opportunistic pathogen.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The draft genome sequence of V. alginolyticus strain V1 can be accessed under the GenBank accession number LCUM00000000 and V. alginolyticus strain V2 under the accession number LCSG00000000. The versions described in this paper are LCUM10000000 and LCSG10000000, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the Danish Directorate for Food, Fisheries and Agri Business (ProAqua, project 09-072829), EU, FP7, Marie Curie, IRSES 2010 (AQUAPHAGE, project 269175), and FISHPHAGE project 131, funded by the European Social Fund and Greek National Resources under the “Excellence” scheme, NSFR 2007–2013.

Footnotes

Citation Castillo D, D’Alvise P, Kalatzis PG, Kokkari C, Middelboe M, Gram L, Liu S, Katharios P. 2015. Draft genome sequences of Vibrio alginolyticus strains V1 and V2, opportunistic marine pathogens. Genome Announc 3(4):e00729-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00729-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Nishibuchi M. 2006. Miscellaneous human pathogens, p 367–381. In Thompson FL, Austin B, Swings J (ed), The biology of vibrios, vol 1, 1st ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Balebona MC, Andreu MJ, Bordas MA, Zorrilla I, Moriñigo MA, Borrego JJ. 1998. Pathogenicity of Vibrio alginolyticus for cultured gilt-head sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4269–4275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu PC, Chen YC, Lee KK. 2001. Pathogenicity of Vibrio alginolyticus isolated from diseased small abalone Haliotis diversicolor supertexta. Microbios 408:71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee KK, Yu SR, Yang TI, Liu PC, Chen FR. 1996. Isolation and characterization of Vibrio alginolyticus isolated from diseased kuruma prawn, Penaeus japonicus. Lett Appl Microbiol 22:111–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reilly GD, Reilly CA, Smith EG, Baker-Austin C. 2006. Vibrio alginolyticus-associated wound infection acquired in British waters, Guernsey, July 2011. Euro Surveill 16:19994 http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Ciufo S, Li W. 2013. Prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174280/. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D2014. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 14:1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, Hasman H, Kaas RS, Nielsen EM, Aarestrup FM. 2014. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 52:1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. 2011. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W347–W352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES