Abstract
Periodic length fluctuations of airway smooth muscle during breathing are thought to modulate airway responsiveness in vivo. Recent animal and human intact airway studies have shown that pressure fluctuations simulating breathing can only marginally reverse airway narrowing and are ineffective at protecting against future narrowing. However, these previous studies were performed on relatively large (>5 mm diameter) airways, which are inherently stiffer than smaller airways for which a preponderance of airway constriction in asthma likely occurs. The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of breathing-like transmural pressure oscillations to reverse induced narrowing and/or protect against future narrowing of smaller, more compliant intact airways. We constricted smaller (luminal diameter = 2.92 ± 0.29 mm) intact airway segments twice with ACh (10−6 M), once while applying tidal-like pressure oscillations (5–15 cmH2O) before, during, and after inducing constriction (Pre + Post) and again while only imposing the tidal-like pressure oscillation after induced constriction (Post Only). Smaller airways were 128% more compliant than previously studied larger airways. This increased compliance translated into 196% more strain and 76% greater recovery (41 vs. 23%) because of tidal-like pressure oscillations. Larger pressure oscillations (5–25 cmH2O) caused more recovery (77.5 ± 16.5%). However, pressure oscillations applied before and during constriction resulted in the same steady-state diameter as when pressure oscillations were only applied after constriction. These data show that reduced straining of the airways before a challenge likely does not contribute to the emergence of airway hyperreactivity observed in asthma but may serve to sustain a given level of constriction.
Keywords: asthma, deep inspiration, airway, smooth muscle, stretch
in healthy subjects, deep inspirations (DIs) are capable of reversing airway narrowing (bronchodilation) (14, 38, 47) and have been proposed to be capable of attenuating future narrowing (bronchoprotection) (26, 37, 49, 50). However, these effects are diminished in asthmatics (13, 16, 24, 26). Also, purposely refraining from taking DIs results in amplified sensitivity to methacholine in healthy subjects (53). In animals, bronchoconstriction is reduced with increasing tidal volume (12, 48, 52, 54). Additionally, periodic length fluctuations mimicking breathing imposed before (57) or after (5, 17, 21) activation of an isolated strip of airway smooth muscle (ASM) result in a decrease in the amount of force generated by the ASM. These observations, along with the fact that airways from asthmatics are generally stiffer than from healthy subjects (11), spawned the attractive hypothesis that airway hyperreactivity (AHR) in asthma results as a consequence of lack of periodic stretching of airways (53). However, a large structural divide exists between isolated ASM strips and the whole lung in vivo, and it is difficult if not nearly impossible to precisely mimic in situ conditions when designing isolated ASM studies. In short, the connection between these two ends of the biological size spectrum, while enticing, remains ambiguous (35). We previously engineered a system to quantify how ASM-level mechanisms could translate to modulate reactivity at the intact airway level (22, 31). We found that transmural pressure (Ptm) fluctuations showed little capacity to bronchoprotect or bronchodilate intact airways (22, 31). To create >50% reversal of bronchoconstriction, we had to impose large-amplitude Ptm fluctuations (25 cmH2O) every breath (22). Furthermore, the degree of bronchodilation resulting from Ptm fluctuations depended on the magnitude of strain imposed (22).
Our previous studies were performed on relatively large airways (>5-mm luminal diameter, generations 4–5 in humans) (22, 31). There is strong evidence that a preponderance of airway constriction in asthma occurs in smaller airways (<3-mm diameter, generations 7 or higher) (55). Smaller airways are generally more compliant (30, 51) such that the Ptm oscillations of the same size could result in larger strains and consequently greater bronchodilatory and/or bronchoprotective effects. We therefore advanced our ultrasound imaging and processing techniques to study the effect of breathing-like Ptm oscillations on smaller and more compliant airways that would strain more during breathing or a DI.
The goal of this study was to quantify the bronchodilatory and bronchoprotective effects of tidal-like (5–15 cmH2O) Ptm oscillations as well as the bronchodilatory effect of DI-like (5–25 cmH2O) Ptm oscillations in smaller airways and compare these results to those in larger airways from our previous study (22). Our new airways had luminal diameters of ∼3.0 mm with a wall compliance that resulted in a one- to twofold increase in strain attributable to tidal-like Ptm oscillations compared with larger airways. This increased strain resulted in a consequent increase in the ability for these Ptm oscillations to dilate a constricted airway. However, imposing amplified tidal Ptm oscillations before and during the challenge did not reduce the final amount of airway narrowing compared with if the Ptm oscillations were only applied after the airway was constricted. In other words, the Ptm oscillations imbued no substantive a priori bronchoprotection. Taken together, these data suggest that a reduced ability to strain the airways might hamper the capacity to reverse airway narrowing, especially in smaller, more compliant airways, but a reduced straining of airways before a challenge likely does not contribute to AHR observed in asthma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ultrasound intact airway system.
Experiments were performed on a custom-built intact airway system, as previously described (31). Briefly, intact airways were dissected from fresh bovine lungs (Research 87, Boylston, MA), and side branches were ligated to form a leak-free airway and then mounted inside a tissue bath with Krebs solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) (37°C, 5% CO2). The airways were dissected from a more distal region of the tapered main stem bronchus (generations 19–24, ∼23 mm long) than previously studied airways (22) and therefore had smaller luminal diameters. Airways were stretched to 110–120% of their resting length to mimic airway lengthening during tidal breathing and held fixed throughout the experiment (42). A computer-controlled syringe pump modulates the height of fluid in a pressure column connected in series with the airway to deliver Ptm oscillations that mimic breathing. An ultrasound system (SonixTablet; Ultrasonix Medical, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada) with high-frequency linear array transducer (L40-8/12, center frequency = 15 MHz) was partially submerged in the tissue bath and mounted <1 cm above the outer edge of the airway and positioned parallel to the long axis of the airway segment. The imaging plane of the transducer cuts through the middle of the airway along its length, thereby allowing for quantification of luminal diameter and wall thickness at each point along the length of the airway. Tissue viability was confirmed with both electric field stimulation and acetylcholine (ACh; 10−5 M), as previously described (22, 27, 31, 32).
Segmentation algorithm.
An updated automated segmentation algorithm developed in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA) was used to determine the location of airway walls in the images. First, the grayscale B-mode was cropped to a region of interest along the length of the airway with the ends being at least a distance equal to two diameters away from the proximal and distal cannulas to minimize end effects. This region remained the same throughout the experiment. Next, the cropped B-mode images were converted to binary using a threshold determined using Otsu's method (43) to distinguish airway wall tissue from the Krebs solution. Morphological operations were performed on the binary images to form a contiguous region for each visible wall of the airway while also smoothing the boundaries. The two airway walls were then defined as the largest two regions in the image, and the lumen was defined as the region between the walls. Figure 1 shows an example image from this upgraded system with detected luminal and outer wall boundaries overlaid.
Fig. 1.

Cross-sectional B-mode ultrasound image of a smaller intact airway. Luminal and outer wall boundaries found using an automated segmentation algorithm are overlaid.
Ultrasound calibration, correction, and validation.
The total number of pixels bounded between the inner edges of the walls was converted to luminal diameter using a calibration factor and correction constant to account for the ultrasound spatial pulse length (spl) (31) and averaged over the length of a region of interest. Specifically, we calculated the mean luminal diameter (D, mm) according to the speed of sound through Krebs solution (cKrebs = 1.54 mm/μs), the total number of pixels within the wall (nd), the time taken to travel between pixels (Δt = 0.232 μs/pixel), the length of the analyzed region in pixels (nL), and the ultrasound spl:
| (1) |
To estimate spl, we imaged seven tissue-mimicking phantoms of known thicknesses between 1.0 and 3.7 mm using identical imaging parameters, as used for intact airways (depth = 15 mm, gain = 0.15, foci at 3 mm and 12 mm), and these images were processed using the segmentation method described above. A linear regression was performed between the known thicknesses (H) of the phantoms and the mean number of pixels between the detected edges (nh) of the corresponding phantoms using H = ctissueΔt·nh/nL − spl (r2 = 0.99), where ctissue is the speed of sound through the tissue-mimicking phantom. The slope of this line is equal to ctissue (1.45 mm/μs), and the magnitude of the y-intercept is equal to the spl (0.23 mm). As a result of this correction algorithm, the minimum luminal diameter we can detect is equal to 0.23 mm. An airway at a diameter this small is considered functionally closed because of its high resistance to flow.
The algorithm was validated using two tissue phantoms mimicking the airways walls, which were separated by a known distance. The correction algorithm reduced the luminal diameter measurement error from 492 μm (8.7%) to 51.4 μm (0.9%).
Experimental protocol.
Airways were constricted twice with a moderate dose of ACh (10−6 M) while imposing one of the following loading conditions in random order: Pre + Post (Fig. 2A), where sinusoidal Ptm oscillations mimicking amplified tidal breathing (5–15 cmH2O, f = 0.2 Hz) were imposed for 20 min immediately before and during the entire 40 min of the constriction; and Post Only (Fig. 2B), where the airway was constricted statically against a Ptm of 5 cmH2O for 20 min, followed by 20 min of Ptm oscillations from 5–15 cmH2O and then 20 min from 5–25 cmH2O to simulate taking a DI with every breath. The airway was allowed to relax in fresh Krebs for 60 min between constrictions. Quasistatic Ptm diameter curves were recorded at the beginning (baseline) and immediately before washout of ACh (constricted) by slowly ramping the Ptm between −10 to 25 cmH2O at a constant rate of 1 cmH2O/s.
Fig. 2.

Intact airways were constricted twice in random order. A: Post Only: airways were constricted statically at a simulated functional residual capacity (transmural pressure, Ptm = 5 cmH2O) for 20 min, followed by 20 min of Ptm oscillations from 5–15 cmH2O for 20 min, and then an additional 20 min from 5–25 cmH2O. B: Pre + Post: airways were exposed to Ptm oscillations (5–15 cmH2O, f = 0.2 Hz) for 20 min immediately before and during the constriction. ACh, acetylcholine.
Data analysis.
Luminal diameters were compared immediately before the addition of ACh (baseline), at its maximally constricted state (peak constriction), and at the end of the tidal-like (5–15 cmH2O) Ptm oscillations (steady state), as well as after DI-like (5–25 cmH2O) Ptm oscillations. The strain imposed during a simulated breath from the luminal diameter at end-expiration (Dexpiration) to end-inspiration (Dinspiration) was calculated as:
| (2) |
During simulated breathing, we defined dynamic specific compliance (sCdyn) as the change in area divided by the change in Ptm and the area at end-expiration (3, 40, 41):
| (3) |
Finally, we defined recovery (i.e., bronchodilation) in the Post Only constriction as the percentage of dilation from the maximally constricted diameter (Dpeak-constriction) back to its diameter before addition of the agonist (Dbaseline).
| (4) |
Statistical analysis.
All data are expressed as means ± SD. Paired t-tests were used to compare luminal diameters at specific time points (baseline, peak constriction, and steady state) between the two different loading conditions (Pre + Post and Post Only) using SigmaPlot 11.0 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA). Paired t-tests were also used to compare specific compliance, strains, and recovery at different Ptm oscillation amplitudes (5–15 and 5–25 cmH2O). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Airway mechanical properties.
Smaller airways had a baseline luminal diameter of 2.92 ± 0.29 mm at a Ptm of 5 cmH2O (n = 5) compared with 5.72 ± 0.52 mm for the larger airways studied previously (22). Our quasistatic Ptm diameter data indicate that smaller airways are more compliant than larger airways above a Ptm corresponding to functional residual capacity (5 cmH2O) both before and after constriction with ACh (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Mean quasistatic deflation Ptm-diameter curves for smaller (black, n = 5) and larger (gray, n = 5) airways before induced constriction (baseline, solid) and after induced narrowing with ACh (constricted, dashed). Data were normalized by the diameter at total lung capacity (TLC) (25 cmH2O) in the baseline state and averaged. Smaller airways are more compliant than larger airways in the large tidal breathing range from 5 to 15 cmH2O (shaded area) both before and after induced narrowing. Larger airway data gathered from Harvey et al. (22).
We calculated sCdyn during simulated breathing after induced narrowing to compare the stiffness of smaller and larger airways (22). The sCdyn of the smaller airway was 0.026 ± 0.006 cmH2O−1 in the tidal breathing range (Ptm = 5–15 cmH2O) and less compliant during DI-like Ptm excursions from 5–25 cmH2O (0.015 ± 0.002 cmH2O−1, P = 0.003). Smaller airways were 128% more compliant from 5–15 cmH2O and 78% more compliant from 5–25 cmH2O than the previously studied larger airways (22).
Bronchodilatory and protective effects in smaller airways.
Figure 4 shows representative traces of a single smaller airway from the Post Only (black) and Pre + Post (gray) protocols. In the Post Only constriction, this airway started at a baseline diameter of 2.93 mm and narrowed to 1.89 mm after 20 min of ACh exposure against a static Ptm of 5 cmH2O (peak constriction). Tidal-like Ptm fluctuations (5–15 cmH2O) resulted in some bronchodilation, and the airway recovered to a diameter of 2.22 mm within 20 min (steady state). DI-like Ptm fluctuations from 5–25 cmH2O (not shown) resulted in dilation to a diameter of 2.78 mm. In the Pre + Post constriction, this airway began at a similar diameter before activation (2.96 mm), and tidal-like Ptm oscillations imposed 11.5% strain per cycle. When the airway was activated, the airway constricted to a diameter of 2.08 mm compared with 1.90 mm when narrowed against a static Ptm. At first, this suggests that applying Ptm oscillations in advance reduced the amount of narrowing (peak constriction). However, these preconstriction oscillations necessarily impose a higher mean Ptm against which the constriction occurs (Ptm = 10 cmH2O in Pre + Post vs. 5 cmH2O in Post Only). In fact, once the oscillations were imposed to the statically constricted airway (at 20 min in the Post Only protocol), its diameter starts to increase and reaches a steady state level (2.28 mm) very similar to the airway that was oscillated before and during the constriction (steady state).
Fig. 4.

Representative trace of a smaller airway from Post Only (black) and Pre + Post (gray) protocols with important time points marked. Vertical lines extend from end-expiration to end-inspiration. The diameters are similar before the addition of ACh (baseline time point). The statically held airway initially constricts more (peak constriction time point), but the final diameters at 40 min (steady state time point) are the same for both protocols.
Figure 5 shows compiled data of smaller airway luminal diameters from the Post Only (black) and Pre + Post (gray) loading conditions at baseline, peak constriction, and steady state (i.e., after 5–15-cmH2O Ptm oscillation) time points. The airways start at the same luminal diameters immediately before the addition of ACh, indicating that the Ptm oscillation before activation did not result in any dilation (baseline, P = 0.601) despite imposing strains of 10.6 ± 2.0%. Activating the airways against a static Ptm in the Post Only condition resulted in 34.0% narrowing, whereas applying Ptm oscillation during narrowing in the Pre + Post loading condition resulted in only 23.5% initial narrowing (peak constriction, P = 0.013). However, once tidal-like Ptm fluctuations were imposed in the Post Only condition, the luminal diameters increased to a similar level as when the Ptm oscillations were applied the entire time (steady state, P = 0.558). Thus applying amplified tidal Ptm fluctuations and hence strains in advance of exposure to an agonist did not protect the airways from future constriction compared with that which would have occurred without prior dynamic Ptm oscillations.
Fig. 5.

Compiled data of smaller airway luminal diameters from the Post Only (black) and Pre + Post (gray) loading conditions at baseline, peak constriction, and steady state (i.e., after 5–15-cmH2O Ptm oscillation) time points. The airway starts at the same luminal diameter in both loading conditions (baseline, P = 0.601). Ptm oscillation during narrowing resulted in less initial constriction in the Pre + Post condition (peak constriction, *P = 0.013), but, once Ptm fluctuations were imposed in the Post Only condition, the luminal diameter increased to a similar level as when the Ptm oscillations were applied the entire time (steady state, P = 0.558).
In the Post Only protocol, Ptm oscillations of 5–15 cmH2O resulted in 14.6 ± 3.3% strain per cycle, whereas 5–25 cmH2O imposed 19.4 ± 3.4% strain (P = 0.004). These cyclic strains resulted in 41.2 and 77.6% recovery from the peak constriction diameter for 5–15 cmH2O and 5–25 cmH2O Ptm oscillations, respectively (P = 0.006).
DISCUSSION
Over the past two decades, the dynamic mechanical environment of the lung has been a major focus in understanding health and disease (39). In particular, results from stretching isolated ASM strips (17, 21, 57) along with in vivo evidence (12, 48, 52–54) led to the hypothesis that a lack of stretch of ASM embedded inside airway walls attributable to breathing could lead to remodeling of the contractile apparatus of the ASM, resulting in AHR associated with asthma (17–19). Furthermore, whereas DIs in healthy subjects are capable of reversing airway narrowing (bronchodilation) (14, 38, 47) and of attenuating future narrowing (bronchoprotection) (26, 37, 49, 50), these beneficial effects of a DI are diminished or absent in asthmatic subjects (13, 16, 24, 26). This latter phenomenon, however, while distinctive behavior for subjects with existing asthma, does not prove that a lack of dynamics before this led to this individual becoming asthmatic. Indeed, recent evidence from intact airway segments excised from both animal (22, 31) and human lungs (41) has surprisingly shown that Ptm fluctuations mimicking breathing before and during induced constriction do not substantively reduce the final degree of airway narrowing. In short, there remains no evidence that a lack of dynamic fluctuations of an airway wall can transition intact airways to become hyperreactive.
Therefore, in this study, we wanted to test whether realistic breathing conditions would be effective at 1) reversing narrowing of a constricted isolated airway (bronchodilation), and/or 2) reducing the degree of narrowing compared with if the airway was held at a static Ptm before and during constriction. In particular, we narrowed isolated airways twice with ACh. In the Post Only constriction, the airway was held at a static Ptm (5 cmH2O), stimulated to narrow, and then 20 min later exposed to 5–15 cmH2O of Ptm oscillations. This protocol assessed whether Ptm oscillations imposed after a constriction takes place, but while the ACh is still present, are capable of creating significant and lasting dilation. In the Pre + Post constriction, Ptm oscillations were imposed before, during, and after activation. This assessed whether Ptm oscillations occurring in advance of and then continuing during the ACh exposure protect the airway from future narrowing. Our data definitively show a lack of a bronchoprotective impact of Ptm oscillations but indicate a potential for a substantive bronchodilation impact if sufficient strains can be imposed during the oscillations.
Previous studies performed on intact airway segments were done on larger airways with luminal diameters >5 mm (22, 31). However, the majority of airway constriction in asthma likely occurs in smaller airways (<3-mm diameter) (55). Because smaller airways are generally more compliant (30, 51), the Ptm oscillations of the same size might impose a larger strain per cycle to the airway wall and the embedded ASM. Furthermore, the degree of recovery is proportional to the magnitude of strain that can be imposed on the airway wall (2, 22). Therefore, we hypothesized that Ptm oscillations might have greater bronchodilatory and bronchoprotective effects in smaller compared with larger airways. To test this hypothesis, we measured the luminal diameter of these smaller airways with and without Ptm oscillations using a state-of-the-art ultrasound system with high-frequency transducer. We compared our results from these smaller airways to the results from Protocol 1 of our previous study, where we applied a similar protocol to larger airways, which were narrowed by a similar percentage (22). Our smaller airways were more than twice as compliant than the larger airways from our previous study (22) in the tidal breathing range (5–15 cmH2O). This increased compliance translated into more strain and greater recovery from induced constriction for a given Ptm oscillation amplitude. Specifically, in our previous study (22), 5–15-cmH2O Ptm oscillations applied after a similar level of constriction resulted in 5.58% strain and 23.4% recovery in larger airways compared with 14.6 and 41.2% in this study on smaller airways. In other words, tidal-like Ptm oscillations resulted in nearly three times more strain and twice as much recovery in smaller airways compared with previously studied larger airways (22).
Applying larger Ptm oscillations, which mimicked taking a DI with every breath (5–25 cmH2O), after constriction resulted in 19.4% strain and 77.5% reversal of constriction, compared with 8.21% strain and 48.3% recovery in previously studied larger airways (22). These strains are significantly larger than those necessary to cause a similar decrease in force in ASM strip experiments (17) although direct, quantitative comparisons between ASM strip and isolated airway experiments are difficult because the relationship between force and narrowing is complex (46). However, these values are consistent with the relationship between magnitude of strain and degree of reversal observed in human precision-cut lung slices, which were narrowed by a similar amount (33). Therefore, sufficient straining of an airway wall attributable to Ptm oscillations might play an important role in the ability to reverse narrowing, especially in smaller, more compliant airways. Because the magnitude of reversal is dependent on the amount of strain that applied to the airway wall, the increased stiffness of asthmatic airways (11) might be an important ingredient necessary for sustaining bronchoconstriction, whether induced or via natural stimuli in a sustained asthma attack. However, because straining of the airway wall was not capable of full reversal of bronchoconstriction, it is likely one factor among several that contribute to the differential response between healthy and asthmatic subjects.
To assess whether lack of breathing dynamics is a critical trajectory leading to AHR, we compared the constriction achieved when tidal-like Ptm oscillations were applied before and during induced constriction (Pre + Post) to the case when Ptm oscillations were applied only after constriction (Post Only). The Ptm oscillations before ACh were sufficient to strain the walls by 10.6% and at first appeared to reduce the initial degree of constriction by a small amount compared with constriction from the static loading condition. However, this difference was eliminated soon after Ptm oscillations were imposed to the statically constricted airway in Post Only condition. We believe that this transient difference can be explained by the increased mean Ptm against which the airway was narrowed during the Ptm oscillations (i.e., 10 cmH2O for 5–15 cmH2O vs. 5 cmH2O) rather than a bronchoprotective effect of dynamics per se at the level of the ASM. Indeed, in a previous study (31), when we applied Ptm oscillations around a mean of 5 cmH2O rather than from 5–10 cmH2O, there was no evidence of even a transient difference. Our data support the notion that the so-labeled bronchoprotective effect of a DI observed in vivo (26, 37, 49, 50) is not due to a prevention of the ASM from becoming too stiff through decreased cross-bridge cycling or reduced cytoskeleton fluidization (29). These results are consistent with our previously studied larger airways (22). Similarly, in a recent study by Pascoe et al. (45), application of two DI-like stretches before activation with ACh of an isolated ASM strip provided no distinctive protection from eventual ASM shortening compared with stimulating the ASM without prior DI.
In our previous study (22), we found a high correlation between the resultant strain imposed on an airway wall and the degree of recovery. In that study (22), we used a slightly different definition of strain. We therefore recalculated the strains based on the definition used in this paper so that direct comparisons could be made. For the larger airways studied previously (22), we found that each additional 1% of strain imposed would result in a 13% increase in recovery. However, a threshold of 2% strain was required to achieve any recovery. If this linear trend held for the smaller airways, the 14.6% strain imposed by the tidal-like Ptm oscillations would have resulted in 97% recovery. Because this strain only caused 41.2% recovery, the relationship between imposed strain and recovery may not be universal for all airways of all sizes but may be distinctive depending on the airway size and airway wall composition.
In this experiment, we were able to test airways significantly smaller and more compliant than our previous system allowed. Nevertheless, there is the potential that even smaller airways deeper into the lung are more compliant and therefore exhibit a larger bronchodilatory or bronchoprotective effect of breathing Ptm oscillations. However, in the relevant Ptm range above 5 cmH2O, the airways we studied here are likely of similar compliance as the terminal bronchioles. Figure 6 compares the normalized Ptm-diameter curves from smaller (black dashed line) and larger (black solid line) (22) bovine airways to predicted curves based on the model developed by Lambert et al. (gray) (30). Note that, whereas airways deeper in the tree become much more compliant than our smaller airways from 0–2 cmH2O, the curves converge for Ptm above 5 cmH2O. This provides evidence that Ptm oscillations applied to even smaller airways would not result in significantly more strain. Nonetheless, even smaller airways might show a differential response to Ptm oscillations if they have a different ratio of ASM to extracellular matrix (ECM) even with comparable compliances with the airways studied here. Future studies performed on smaller airways are necessary to confirm this although some evidence suggests that the strain-recovery relationship is similar in even smaller airways embedded within lung slices when constricted by a similar amount (33).
Fig. 6.

Comparison of normalized deflation Ptm-diameter curves from our smaller (black, dashed) and larger (black, solid) (22) bovine airways to the predicted relationship by Lambert et al. (gray) (30) for all generations from 0 (trachea) to 16. In the typical breathing range above 5 cmH2O, generations 6 and above converge onto one curve and closely match the properties of the smaller airways studied here.
In this study, we chose to impose slightly amplified tidal-like breathing (i.e., Ptm = 5–15 cmH2O). Given the Ptm-diameter properties of the airways we studied (see Fig. 3), this amplitude of oscillations ensured that we imposed close to the maximum potential strains achievable. Although in vivo experiments assess bronchoprotection by imposing a series of DIs immediately before a challenge (26, 37, 49, 50), we chose not to look at these artificial Ptm conditions because people naturally only take a DI every 6 min (6) rather than continuously breathing from 5–30 cmH2O. We decided not to simulate these occasional DIs because their effect is known to be transient, with the effect gone in <6 min and the majority gone within 1–2 min (7, 37, 41).
Among the plethora of studies that have explored the effect of breathing dynamics on reactivity of isolated ASM strips, it turns out that very few have examined the effect of prior oscillations on the effect of future force generation or shortening. The limited number of studies that did attempt to look at this effect found at best a minimal effect of the prior oscillations (45, 57). Taken together with previous (22, 41) intact airway studies, with the current study we can now conclude that, although breathing oscillations can partially reverse the narrowing of constricted airway, there is little evidence that periodic stretching protects airways from abnormally constricting in the first place.
Our results refute the notion that an otherwise healthy airway can transition to one that is hyperreactive in a fashion similar to asthma simply by prohibiting its dynamic wall movements associated with breathing. Consequently, we conjecture that there is something fundamentally different about asthmatic airways other than simply a transition of their ASM attributable to altered airway dynamics. Several alternative hypotheses have been proposed (35). One hypothesis states that chronic inflammatory conditions might lead to hyperresponsive airways through a phenomenon known as force adaptation (8–10). In particular, Bossé et al. (8–10) hypothesized that chronic low levels of airway inflammation can lead to sustained increased basal ASM tone, resulting in the force-adaptation process and ASM that is capable of generating increased force in response to an additional contractile stimulus. This phenomenon still needs to be tested at the intact airway level. Of course, chronic exposure to increased tension can result in remodeling of several other constituents within the walls of airways besides the ASM. Hence, it is likely that, for an airway to transition from healthy to hyperreactive, it requires a confluence of phenomena (including but not exclusively dynamics) that alter the ASM and the constituents of the ECM within which it contracts when exposed to an agonist. Because this experiment was designed to study the short-term effects of Ptm oscillations, the consequences of airway wall remodeling could not be observed.
The change in caliber of an airway to agonist and indeed the force and stiffness of the ASM itself should be codependent on the composition and stiffness of the ECM in the airway wall (1, 23, 28, 44). Hence, mechanisms of exaggerated airway narrowing and force generation proposed at the level of ASM isolated from its native ECM may not necessarily translate to the level of the airway, let alone the intact human. Also, most experiments examining the effect of stretching on ASM force generation use tracheal ASM strips that may have distinct properties and cell phenotypes from bronchial ASM (36). Importantly, testing hypotheses generated from isolated ASM strips or even isolated intact airways in vitro is problematic because of the plethora of confounding factors at the level of the whole organ. We have recently described and cited evidence of several explanations for how lack of periodic volume changes in healthy subjects would amplify reactivity in ways independent of ASM dynamics (35), including heterogeneity (20, 25, 34, 56), emergent atelectasis (7), and increased mean pressures with larger tidal volumes (52). Furthermore, a relatively minor change in airway caliber can potentially synergize with other factors to be significant at the whole lung level, especially because airway resistance is inversely proportional to diameter to the fourth power (45).
Following a challenge in vivo, there is clearance of spasmogens, and therefore concentration decreases over time. In this study, airways were exposed to a constant concentration of ACh throughout our protocols. We chose to do this because very little quantitative information is known on important parameters such as clearance rate, and addition of an extra variable would make interpretation of our results more difficult. Moreover, it is not clear how long ASM agonists persist in the airways during an actual asthma attack. Interestingly, in the absence of DIs, airway resistance remains elevated for at least 30 min following a challenge, but the bronchodilatory effect of DI increases over this time, presumably because the concentration of agonist has decreased (15). Similarly, in isolated airways, the effect of Ptm oscillations is greater when a bronchodilator is added to a constricted airway (4). Future studies are needed to explore the effect of a decreasing concentration of the effectiveness of a DI to reverse narrowing of an isolated airway.
All of the experiments presented here and our previous studies were performed on bovine airways (22, 31). Human airways have slightly different compositions and mechanical properties. In particular, the specific compliance during Ptm oscillation from 5–10 cmH2O is 0.02–0.03 cmH2O−1 in human airways (40, 41), whereas similar-sized bovine airways have a specific compliance of 0.01 cmH2O−1 (22). Nevertheless, Noble et al. (40, 41) have done similar experiments on larger-sized human airways with results similar to our bovine larger airways. It remains to be shown whether the same will happen when comparing analogous small human airways to our smaller bovine ones.
In conclusion, we showed that, compared with previously studied larger airways, the smaller airways were more compliant, and therefore Ptm oscillations resulted in more strain and an increased recovery from constriction compared with larger, stiffer airways. By implication, then, loss of a capacity to impose strain on a constricted airway could contribute to the inability for asthmatics to partially reverse an attack. Conversely, our data do not support the notion that asthmatic airways emerge simply because of phenomena that would diminish airway wall fluctuations during breathing and a DI.
GRANTS
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 HL-096797.
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Author contributions: B.C.H., H.P., and K.R.L. conception and design of research; B.C.H. performed experiments; B.C.H. analyzed data; B.C.H., H.P., and K.R.L. interpreted results of experiments; B.C.H. prepared figures; B.C.H. drafted manuscript; B.C.H., H.P., and K.R.L. edited and revised manuscript; B.C.H., H.P., and K.R.L. approved final version of manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.An SS, Kim J, Ahn K, Trepat X, Drake KJ, Kumar S, Ling G, Purington C, Rangasamy T, Kensler TW, Mitzner W, Fredberg JJ, Biswal S. Cell stiffness, contractile stress and the role of extracellular matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 382: 697–703, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ansell TK, McFawn PK, Mitchell HW, Noble PB. Bronchodilatory response to deep inspiration in bronchial segments: the effects of stress vs. strain. J Appl Physiol 115: 505–513, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ansell TK, McFawn PK, Noble PB, West a R, Fernandes L, Mitchell HW. Potent bronchodilation and reduced stiffness by relaxant stimuli under dynamic conditions. Eur Respir J 33: 844–851, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ansell TK, Noble PB, Mitchell HW, McFawn PK. Pharmacological bronchodilation is partially mediated by reduced airway wall stiffness. Br J Pharmacol 171: 4376–4384, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bates JHT, Bullimore SR, Politi AZ, Sneyd J, Anafi RC, Lauzon AM. Transient oscillatory force-length behavior of activated airway smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 297: L362–L372, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bendixen HH, Smith GM, Mead J. Pattern of ventilation in young adults. J Appl Physiol 19: 195–198, 1964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Black LD, Henderson AC, Atileh H, Israel E, Ingenito EP, Lutchen KR. Relating maximum airway dilation and subsequent reconstriction to reactivity in human lungs. J Appl Physiol 96: 1808–1814, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bossé Y, Chapman DG, Paré PD, King GG, Salome CM. A “Good” muscle in a “Bad” environment: the importance of airway smooth muscle force adaptation to airway hyperresponsiveness. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 179: 269–275, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bossé Y, Chin LYM, Paré PD, Seow CY. Adaptation of airway smooth muscle to basal tone: relevance to airway hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 40: 13–18, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bossé Y, Chin LYM, Paré PD, Seow CY. Chronic activation in shortened airway smooth muscle: a synergistic combination underlying airway hyperresponsiveness? Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 42: 341–348, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brackel HJ, Pedersen OF, Mulder PG, Overbeek SE, Kerrebijn KF, Bogaard JM. Central airways behave more stiffly during forced expiration in patients with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162: 896–904, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brown R, Mitzner W. Effects of tidal volume stretch on airway constriction in vivo. J Appl Physiol 91: 1995–1998, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brown RH, Scichilone N, Mudge B, Diemer FB, Permutt S, Togias A. High-resolution computed tomographic evaluation of airway distensibility and the effects of lung inflation on airway caliber in healthy subjects and individuals with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 994–1001, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brusasco V, Crimi E, Barisione G, Spanevello A, Rodarte JR, Pellegrino R. Airway responsiveness to methacholine: effects of deep inhalations and airway inflammation. J Appl Physiol 87: 567–573, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chapman DG, Pascoe CD, Lee-Gosselin A, Couture C, Seow CY, Paré PD, Salome CM, King GG, Bossé Y. Smooth muscle in the maintenance of increased airway resistance elicited by methacholine in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190: 879–885, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fish JE, Ankin MG, Kelly JF, Peterman VI. Regulation of bronchomotor tone by lung inflation in asthmatic and nonasthmatic subjects. J Appl Physiol 50: 1079–1086, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fredberg JJ, Inouye D, Miller B, Nathan M, Jafari S, Raboudi SH, Butler JP, Shore SA. Airway smooth muscle, tidal stretches, and dynamically determined contractile states. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156: 1752–1759, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fredberg JJ. Airway smooth muscle in asthma: flirting with disaster. Eur Respir J 12: 1252–1256, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fredberg JJ. Frozen objects: small airways, big breaths, and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 106: 615–624, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gillis HL, Lutchen KR. Airway remodeling in asthma amplifies heterogeneities in smooth muscle shortening causing hyperresponsiveness. J Appl Physiol 86: 2001–2012, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gunst SJ. Contractile force of canine airway smooth muscle during cyclical length changes. J Appl Physiol 55: 759–769, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harvey BC, Parameswaran H, Lutchen KR. Can tidal breathing with deep inspirations of intact airways create sustained bronchoprotection or bronchodilation? J Appl Physiol 115: 436–445, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hiorns JE, Jensen OE, Brook BS. Nonlinear compliance modulates dynamic bronchoconstriction in a multiscale airway model. Biophys J 107: 3030–3042, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jensen A, Atileh H, Suki B, Ingenito EP, Lutchen KR. Selected contribution: airway caliber in healthy and asthmatic subjects: effects of bronchial challenge and deep inspirations. J Appl Physiol 91: 506–515, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kaczka DW, Brown RH, Mitzner W. Assessment of heterogeneous airway constriction in dogs: a structure-function analysis. J Appl Physiol 106: 520–530, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kapsali T, Permutt S, Laube B, Scichilone N, Togias A. Potent bronchoprotective effect of deep inspiration and its absence in asthma. J Appl Physiol 89: 711–720, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Khangure SR, Noble PB, Sharma A, Chia PY, McFawn PK, Mitchell HW. Cyclical elongation regulates contractile responses of isolated airways. J Appl Physiol 97: 913–919, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Krishnan R, Park CY, Lin YC, Mead J, Jaspers RT, Trepat X, Lenormand G, Tambe D, Smolensky AV, Knoll AH, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ. Reinforcement versus fluidization in cytoskeletal mechanoresponsiveness. PLoS One 4: e5486, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Krishnan R, Trepat X, Nguyen TTB, Lenormand G, Oliver M, Fredberg JJ. Airway smooth muscle and bronchospasm: fluctuating, fluidizing, freezing. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 163: 17–24, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lambert RK, Wilson TA, Hyatt RE, Rodarte JR. A computational model for expiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 52: 44–56, 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.LaPrad AS, Szabo TL, Suki B, Lutchen KR. Tidal stretches do not modulate responsiveness of intact airways in vitro. J Appl Physiol 109: 295–304, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.LaPrad AS, West AR, Noble PB, Lutchen KR, Mitchell HW. Maintenance of airway caliber in isolated airways by deep inspiration and tidal strains. J Appl Physiol 105: 479–485, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lavoie TL, Krishnan R, Siegel HR, Maston ED, Fredberg JJ, Solway J, Dowell ML. Dilatation of the constricted human airway by tidal expansion of lung parenchyma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 186: 225–232, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lutchen KR, Jensen A, Atileh H, Kaczka DW, Israel E, Suki B, Ingenito EP. Airway constriction pattern is a central component of asthma severity: the role of deep inspirations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164: 207–215, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lutchen KR. Airway smooth muscle stretch and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: have we chased the wrong horse? J Appl Physiol 116: 1113–1115, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ma X, Li W, Stephens NL. Heterogeneity of airway smooth muscle at tissue and cellular levels. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 75: 930–935, 1997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Malmberg P, Larsson K, Sundblad BM, Zhiping W. Importance of the time interval between FEV1 measurements in a methacholine provocation test. Eur Respir J 6: 680–686, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nadel JA, Tierney DF. Effect of a previous deep inspiration on airway resistance in man. J Appl Physiol 16: 717–719, 1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Noble PB, Ansell TK, James AL, McFawn PK, Mitchell HW. Airway smooth muscle dynamics and hyperresponsiveness: in and outside the clinic. J Allergy 2012: 157047, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Noble PB, Jones RL, Cairncross A, Elliot JG, Mitchell HW, James AL, McFawn PK. Airway narrowing and bronchodilation to deep inspiration in bronchial segments from subjects with and without reported asthma. J Appl Physiol 114: 1460–1471, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Noble PB, Jones RL, Needi ET, Cairncross A, Mitchell HW, James AL, McFawn PK. Responsiveness of the human airway in vitro during deep inspiration and tidal oscillation. J Appl Physiol 110: 1510–1518, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Noble PB, Sharma a McFawn PK, Mitchell HW. Airway narrowing in porcine bronchi with and without lung parenchyma. Eur Respir J 26: 804–811, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9: 62–66, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Parameswaran H, Lutchen KR, Suki B. A computational model of the response of adherent cells to stretch and changes in substrate stiffness. J Appl Physiol 116: 825–834, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pascoe CD, Donovan GM, Bossé Y, Seow CY, Paré PD. Bronchoprotective effect of simulated deep inspirations in tracheal smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 117: 1502–1513, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pascoe CD, Seow CY, Paré PD, Bossé Y. Decrease of airway smooth muscle contractility induced by simulated breathing maneuvers is not simply proportional to strain. J Appl Physiol 114: 335–343, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Salerno FG, Pellegrino R, Trocchio G, Spanevello A, Brusasco V, Crimi E. Attenuation of induced bronchoconstriction in healthy subjects: effects of breathing depth. J Appl Physiol 98: 817–821, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Salerno FG, Shinozuka N, Fredberg JJ, Ludwig MS. Tidal volume amplitude affects the degree of induced bronchoconstriction in dogs. J Appl Physiol 87: 1674–1677, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Scichilone N, Kapsali T, Permutt S, Togias A. Deep inspiration-induced bronchoprotection is stronger than bronchodilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162: 910–916, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Scichilone N, Permutt S, Togias A. The lack of the bronchoprotective and not the bronchodilatory ability of deep inspiration is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 413–419, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sera T, Fujioka H, Yokota H, Makinouchi A, Himeno R, Schroter RC, Tanishita K. Localized compliance of small airways in excised rat lungs using microfocal X-ray computed tomography. J Appl Physiol 96: 1665–1673, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shen X, Gunst SJ, Tepper RS. Effect of tidal volume and frequency on airway responsiveness in mechanically ventilated rabbits. J Appl Physiol 83: 1202–1208, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Skloot G, Permutt S, Togias A. Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: a problem of limited smooth muscle relaxation with inspiration. J Clin Invest 96: 2393–2403, 1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tepper RS, Shen X, Bakan E, Gunst SJ. Maximal airway response in mature and immature rabbits during tidal ventilation. J Appl Physiol 79: 1190–1198, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tgavalekos NT, Tawhai M, Harris RS, Musch G, Mush G, Vidal-Melo M, Venegas JG, Lutchen KR. Identifying airways responsible for heterogeneous ventilation and mechanical dysfunction in asthma: an image functional modeling approach. J Appl Physiol 99: 2388–2397, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Venegas JG, Winkler T, Musch G, Vidal Melo MF, Layfield D, Tgavalekos N, Fischman AJ, Callahan RJ, Bellani G, Harris RS. Self-organized patchiness in asthma as a prelude to catastrophic shifts. Nature 434: 777–782, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang L, Paré PD, Seow CY. Effects of length oscillation on the subsequent force development in swine tracheal smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 88: 2246–2250, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
