Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0132694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132694

Comparison of Bacterial Burden and Cytokine Gene Expression in Golden Hamsters in Early Phase of Infection with Two Different Strains of Leptospira interrogans

Rie Fujita 1,2, Nobuo Koizumi 2,*, Hiromu Sugiyama 3, Rina Tomizawa 1,2, Ryoichi Sato 1, Makoto Ohnishi 2
Editor: Yung-Fu Chang4
PMCID: PMC4492770  PMID: 26146835

Abstract

Leptospirosis, a zoonotic infection with worldwide prevalence, is caused by pathogenic spirochaetes of Leptospira spp., and exhibits an extremely broad clinical spectrum in human patients. Although previous studies indicated that specific serovars or genotypes of Leptospira spp. were associated with severe leptospirosis or its outbreak, the mechanism underlying the difference in virulence of the various Leptospira serotypes or genotypes remains unclear. The present study addresses this question by measuring and comparing bacterial burden and cytokine gene expression in hamsters infected with strains of two L. interrogans serovars Manilae (highly virulent) and Hebdomadis (less virulent). The histopathology of kidney, liver, and lung tissues was also investigated in infected hamsters. A significantly higher bacterial burden was observed in liver tissues of hamsters infected with serovar Manilae than those infected with serovar Hebdomadis (p < 0.01). The average copy number of the leptospiral genome was 1,302 and 20,559 in blood and liver, respectively, of hamsters infected with serovar Manilae and 1,340 and 4,896, respectively, in hamsters infected with serovar Hebdomadis. The expression levels of mip1alpha in blood; tgfbeta, il1beta, mip1alpha, il10, tnfalpha and cox2 in liver; and tgfbeta, il6, tnfalpha and cox2 in lung tissue were significantly higher in hamsters infected with serovar Manilae than those infected with serovar Hebdomadis (p < 0.05). In addition, infection with serovar Manilae resulted in a significantly larger number of hamsters with tnfalpha upregulation (p = 0.04). Severe distortion of tubular cell arrangement and disruption of renal tubules in kidney tissues and hemorrhage in lung tissues were observed in Manilae-infected hamsters. These results demonstrate that serovar Manilae multiplied more efficiently in liver tissues and induced significantly higher expression of genes encoding pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines than serovar Hebdomadis even in tissues for which a significant difference in leptospiral load was not observed. In addition, our results suggest a serovar Manilae-specific mechanism responsible for inducing severe damage in kidneys and hemorrhage in lung.

Introduction

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic infection caused by pathogenic spirochaetes of Leptospira spp., and has worldwide prevalence. The disease constitutes an important public health problem in tropical regions, particularly in South and Southeast Asia as well as Latin America [1, 2]. Leptospires colonize the proximal renal tubules and are excreted in the urine of maintenance hosts [2, 3]. Human leptospirosis is chiefly transmitted by exposure to water or soil contaminated with the urine of infected animals [3].

Human leptospirosis is an acute febrile illness with an extremely broad clinical spectrum ranging from mild influenza-like illness to severe disease forms characterized by jaundice, bleeding, renal failure, and death [2, 4]. In recent years, a severe form of the disease characterized by pulmonary hemorrhage, known as leptospirosis-associated severe pulmonary hemorrhage syndrome, has gained attention as an important cause of mortality [2, 5]. However, a majority of infected patients develop subclinical or very mild illness [6, 7], with only 5%–10% of the patients potentially developing a severe form of the disease [2, 8]. The infecting inoculum dose of leptospires, pre-existing immunity because of a previous infection and/or genetic determinants in patients pertaining to innate or acquired immunity are considered possible determinants of disease severity [9].

Several studies have demonstrated the association between serum levels of cytokines and clinical outcome in patients with leptospirosis [1015]. In contrast to mild leptospirosis, a broad activation of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines was observed to occur in patients with severe disease, which is similar to the cytokine storm observed during sepsis caused by other bacteria [10]. Of the several cytokines with elevated levels, IL-6 and IL-10 are independent predictors of death [10]. Leptospirosis cases with fatal outcomes exhibited higher IL-10 but lower TNF-α levels than survivors, and a positive correlation was identified between the IL-10/TNF-α ratio and fatal outcomes [11]. However, another group reported high levels of TNF-α in severe disease as well as association of high IL-10/TNF-α ratio with lower disease severity [12, 13]. Other cytokines, such as soluble ST2 and long pentraxin PTX3, have been shown to be associated with severe leptospirosis [14, 15]. In an animal model of leptospirosis, genes for both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, including tnfalpha, il1alpha, cox2 and il10, were significantly upregulated in the blood of dead compared with recovered hamsters [16].

In addition to host immune responses, virulence determinants of the infecting Leptospira strains also affect disease severity. Severe leptospirosis is frequently caused by strains of the serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae, although the association of distinct clinical syndromes with specific serogroups has been refuted [8, 17]. In addition to the serological phenotypes, a specific clone belonging to L. interrogans serovars Copenhageni and Autumnalis has been shown to be associated with severe pulmonary hemorrhage syndrome in Brazil and outbreaks of leptospirosis in Thailand, respectively [18, 19]. However, the mechanism underlying the differences in virulence of various Leptospira serotypes or genotypes remains unclear.

Our previous study showed the difference in virulence of two L. interrogans strains belonging to different serovars in hamsters [20]; a strain of L. interrogans serovar Manilae caused lethality in hamsters, while 107 cells of a strain of L. interrogans serovar Hebdomadis failed to cause death [20]. In the present study, we aimed to gain insights into the mechanism underlying the difference in virulence of the strains belonging to different L. interrogans serovars. With this goal, we compared the expression of cytokine genes and leptospiral burden in tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Materials and Methods

Strains of L. interrogans and culture conditions

L. interrogans serovar Manilae strain UP-MMC-NIID and L. interrogans serovar Hebdomadis strain OP84 [20, 21] were employed in the present study. The strains were cultured in liquid modified Korthof’s medium supplemented with 10% rabbit serum at 30°C [3]. The strains were stored in korthof’s medium containing 10% glycerol at −80°C and subjected to in vivo passage at least once every two years during which the serovar Manilae strain maintained lethality. The virulence of the strains in hamsters was examined prior to each infection experiment, and leptospires were recovered from kidney tissues of infected hamsters. Each strain was passaged in vitro fewer than three times for use in infection experiments. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Research Committee of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (Tokyo, Japan).

Experimental infection of hamsters

Six-week-old female specific-pathogen-free (SPF) golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were employed in this study. Hamsters were purchased from SLC (Shizuoka, Japan) and three or four animals were housed in one cage according to the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research standard. All animals had unfettered access to irradiated standard diet and sterile drinking water and were maintained in a 14 h-light/10 h-dark cycle at the SPF ward. No apparent abnormalities were observed in all animals prior to infection experiments. The number of leptospiral cells was enumerated using a counting chamber of 0.010-mm depth (Nitirin, Tokyo, Japan). Hamsters were subjected to intraperitoneal inoculation with 1 × 106 cells of the L. interrogans strains (of serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis) in the log phase suspended in 500 μl of Korthof’s medium. Hamsters inoculated with the same volume of medium alone were employed as controls. For preliminary time-course experiments, three hamsters inoculated with each Leptospira strain were euthanized by isoflurane inhalation at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h postinoculation (pi). For the main experiments, seven and eight hamsters inoculated with the strains of serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis, respectively, were similarly euthanized at 96 h pi. Inoculation of one hamster with the strain belonging to serovar Manilae was not successful and was excluded from this study. All animals survived with no complications in each experiment. Immediately following euthanasia, whole blood was collected by cardiac puncture; 50 μl of blood was inoculated into 4 ml of Korthof’s medium and was cultured as described above. In addition, 100 μl of blood was collected in microtubes containing 100 μl of PBS and 20 μl of proteinase K (DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and was immediately subjected to DNA extraction (detailed below). For RNA extraction, 500 μl of blood was collected in RNAprotect Animal Blood Tubes (Qiagen) and stabilized at room temperature for 2 h prior to storage at −20°C. Following the collection of blood, the hamsters were dissected and kidney, liver, and lung tissues were collected for DNA/RNA extraction and histological examination, as subsequently detailed. Three-fourths of the kidney tissue, ventral medial lobe of the liver tissue, and left lobe of the lung tissue were stored at −20°C in 2.5–3.5 ml of RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX) until DNA or RNA extraction. The remainder of each tissue was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin followed by sectioning and staining with hematoxylin and eosin.

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from 100 μl of whole blood and approximately 25 mg samples of renal cortex, middle part of the ventral medial lobe of the liver, and the dorsal part of left lobe of the lung tissues using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). The concentration of the extracted DNA samples was determined using NanoDrop Lite Spectrophotometer (Thermo-Scientific, Rockford, IL), and the DNA samples were diluted to a concentration of 100 ng/μl with Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer (pH 8.0).

Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from 500 μl of whole blood and approximately 20 mg samples of renal cortex, middle part of the ventral medial lobe of the liver, and the dorsal part of left lobe of the lung tissues using RNeasy Protect Animal Blood Kit (Qiagen) and RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen), respectively. The concentration of the extracted RNA samples was determined using NanoDrop Lite Spectrophotometer, and 500–1500 ng of RNA was employed for cDNA synthesis using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA remover (Toyobo Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). cDNA concentration was adjusted to 100 ng/μl with RNase-free water for relative quantification (2−ΔΔCt method) or with TE buffer for absolute quantification.

Real-time PCR analysis

Real-time PCR amplification and analysis was conducted using LightCycler Nano instrument and software version 1.1 (Roche Life Sciences, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Reactions were conducted in 20-μl volumes containing THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo Co. Ltd.). Primer sequences and concentrations are listed in Table 1. The PCR conditions included initial denaturation at 95°C for 60 s, followed by 40 cycles of amplification of target sequences at 95°C for 10 s, and 60°C for 30 s. Following the amplification program, melting curve analysis was conducted to assess the specificity of the amplified products.

Table 1. Sequences of primers employed for real-time PCR.

Gene Primer Sequence (5′→3′) Ref. (Accession No.) Primer conc. (nM) Method a Amplification efficiency (%) Amplification efficiency of rpl18 (%) b
Forward Reverse Forward Reverse
RPL18 GTTTATGAGTCGCACTAACCG TGTTCTCTCGGCCAGGAA [36] 300 300
IP10/CXCL10 CTCTACTAAGAGCTGGTCC CTAACACACTTTAAGGTGGG [37] 200 200 C 90.42 93.76
TGFβ TGTGTGCGGCAGCTGTACA TGGGCTCGTGAATCCACTTC [36] 600 600 C 92.79 93.76
IL-1β GGCTGATGCTCCCATTCG CACGAGGCATTTCTGTTGTTCA [36] 200 200 C 94.27 93.76
MIP1α/CCL3 CTCCTGCTGCTTCTTCTA TGGGTTCCTCACTGACTC [37] 200 200 C 97.11 93.66
IL-6 CCTGAAAGCACTTGAAGAATTCC GGTATGCTAAGGCACAGCACACT [36] 600 600 C 97.37 97.79
IL-10 GTTGCCAAACCTTATCAGAAATGA TTCTGGCCCGTGGTTCTCT [36] 600 600 C 93.87 95.79
iNOS TGGCAGGATGGGAAACTGA GCACCGCTTTCACCAAGACT [36] 300 300 C 91.19 93.95
TNF-α GGAGTGGCTGAGCCATCGT AGCTGGTTGTCTTTGAGAGACATG [36] 300 300 C 90.94 94.35
COX-2 CTTCCTCCTGTGGCTGATGACT TCTTTCGAATCAGGAAGCTCCTT This study (AF345331) c 600 600 C 90.77 91.61
GAPDH CCGAGTATGTTGTGGAGTCTA GCTGACAATCTTGAGGGA [37] 900 900
IFN-γ GGCCATCCAGAGGAGCATAG TTTCTCCATGCTGCTGTTGAA [36] 600 600 A
IL-2 GTGCACCCACTTCAAGCTCTAA AAGCTCCTGTAAGTCCAGCAGTAAC [36] 900 900 A
IL-4 CCAGGTGCTTCGCAAGTTTT TCTTTGAGAACCCTGGAATTGTTC This study (XM_005067769) c 900 900 A
flaB CTTACGARAGATCATGAAGCAGAG TGTTTTGTGGTCAGCGAGACA This study 900 900 A

a C: Comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method (2−ΔΔCt method); A: Absolute quantification

b Efficiency of RPL18 amplification simultaneously with that of each target gene

c Accession number

Quantification of leptospiral DNA in animal tissues

Absolute quantification of the gene flaB encoding leptospiral flagellin was employed for quantifying leptospiral DNA in hamster tissues under the abovementioned conditions. A standard curve for quantification was generated using serially diluted genomic DNA of known concentration extracted from L. interrogans serovar Manilae strain. The housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapdh) from a hamster was simultaneously quantified for verifying the quality and quantity of the extracted DNA. Results were expressed as genome equivalents per microliter of whole blood or per 200 ng DNA from other tissues, and the number of genome equivalents in the reaction mixture was calculated considering a genome size of 4.6 Mbp (corresponding to L. interrogans Fiocruz L1-130 [22]). Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted DNA samples for each tissue of infected hamsters. Statistical comparison of the leptospiral genome copy numbers observed in tissues infected with serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis was conducted using Mann–Whitney U test.

Cytokine gene expression analysis

The gene encoding ribosomal protein L18 (RPL18) was selected as an internal reference because its expression was more stable in all the tissues of infected and control hamsters compared with GAPDH or β-2-microglobulin genes (data not shown). The amplification efficiency (AE) for each primer set was determined by generating a standard curve from serial dilutions of cDNA synthesized from RNA extracted from Leptospira-inoculated hamster tissues. AE was calculated using the formula AE = 10[−1/slope] − 1 (the slope was determined from the correlation between the Ct value and template concentration). The differences between the AE of each target gene (including nine genes, with the exception of il2, il4, and ifngamma) and the AE of rpl18 (Table 1) did not exceed 5%. Thus, quantification of the expression of these nine target genes was conducted using the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method (2−ΔΔCt method) using rpl18 as a calibrator gene. For these nine target genes, relative gene expression was calculated as the ratio of the level of expression in infected to control hamsters. For certain genes whose expression was not detectable in control hamsters, the gene expression level in infected hamsters was calculated as the ratio of the level of expression in hamsters infected with serovar Manilae to those infected with serovar Hebdomadis. The expression of il2, il4, and ifngamma was determined by absolute quantification using a standard curve generated by amplifying serial dilutions of known concentrations of plasmids containing each target sequence using the primer sets listed in Table 1. The cut-off value for real-time PCR was set as Ct35. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each tissue of infected hamsters. Statistical comparison of cytokine gene expression in tissues infected with serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis was conducted using Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

Temporal changes in bacterial burden and cytokine gene expression in hamsters infected with strains of two different L. interrogans serovars

A previous study from our group demonstrated that hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovar Manilae (inoculum dose of 1 × 106 cells) died at 100–120 h pi. Therefore, as a preliminary experiment, leptospiral burden and the expression of cytokine genes were measured in tissues of infected hamsters at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi.

Leptospiral burden in tissues was determined as genome equivalents by real-time PCR targeting the leptospiral flaB gene. flaB was detected in blood and the liver tissue of hamsters infected with either of the two strains from 48 h pi onwards but only at 96 h pi in kidney and lung tissues (S1 Fig).

The expression of 12 cytokine genes listed in Table 1 was quantified by the 2−ΔΔCt or absolute quantification method. The expression of ip10, il6, and il10 in blood; ip10 in kidney; il6 in liver; and il10 in lung tissue were assessed by comparing ΔCt (Ct of target gene − Ct of rpl18) between hamsters infected with the serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis because of lack of detectability in control hamsters. All genes, with the exception of inos in kidney and liver tissues, were upregulated upon infection with either of the two strains, and maximum expression of most of the genes was detected at 96 h pi (S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6 Figs). The level of expression of il2, il4, and ifngamma was determined by the absolute quantification method. Slight elevation in the expression of ifngamma was detected only in the liver tissue of hamsters infected with serovar Manilae at 96 h pi (data not shown). On the other hand, the expression of il2 and il4 was below the detection limit in all tissues at any time point irrespective of infection.

Histopathological changes were observed in infected hamsters at 96 h pi. Urinary casts were observed in the kidney tissues of both groups, while degenerative to necrotic changes were evident only in hamsters infected with serovar Manilae, which exhibited severe distortion of tubular cell arrangement and disruption of renal tubules (S7A–S7C Fig). Severe lesions were not observed in liver tissues; however, cloudy swelling of hepatocytes was observed in hamsters infected with serovar Manilae (S7D–S7F Fig). Hemorrhage was observed in lung tissues of hamsters infected with serovar Manilae (S7G–S7I Fig).

Leptospires were detectable in kidney and lung tissues only at 96 h pi, and maximum leptospiral burden was observed in blood and liver at 96 h pi (S1 Fig). In addition, maximum expression of the majority of cytokine genes investigated in tissues was observed at 96 h pi (S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6 Figs). Therefore, leptospiral burden and the levels of expression of cytokine genes in tissues were compared at 96 h pi using a larger sample size in subsequent experiments.

Comparison of leptospiral burden in tissues of hamsters infected with strains of two L. interrogans serovars at 96 h pi

Leptospiral burden was significantly higher in liver tissues of hamsters infected with serovar Manilae as opposed to serovar Hebdomadis (p < 0.01; Fig 1); significant differences were not observed in other tissues of hamsters infected with strains of the two serovars.

Fig 1. Quantification of leptospiral DNA in tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis at 96 h pi.

Fig 1

Leptospiral DNA was quantified by real-time PCR targeting leptospiral flaB gene in blood (A), kidney (B), liver (C), and lung (D) tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled boxes) or Hebdomadis (open boxes) at 96 h pi. The bottom, median, and top lines of the box indicate the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively. The vertical line with whiskers shows the range of values. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted DNA samples for each tissue of infected hamsters; each dot indicates the average of two experiments. Data out of the range of values were excluded from statistical analysis. **, p < 0.01.

Comparison of expression levels of cytokine genes in tissues of hamsters infected with strains of two L. interrogans serovars at 96 h pi

Of the 12 cytokine genes tested, the expression of three genes il1beta, mip1alpha, and tgfbeta was upregulated in the blood of infected hamsters (Fig 2). Moreover, the expression of mip1alpha was significantly higher in hamsters infected with serovar Manilae as opposed to serovar Hebdomadis (p < 0.05; Fig 2). In addition, the number of hamsters with detectable expression of tnfalpha was significantly higher in the group infected with serovar Manilae (5/7 animals) as opposed to serovar Hebdomadis (1/8 animals; p = 0.04, as determined by Fischer’s Exact test). The expression of eight of the 12 genes tested was upregulated in kidney tissues upon leptospiral infection, although significant differences were not detected between the two serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis (Fig 3). The expression of eight of the 12 genes tested was enhanced in both liver and lung tissues upon leptospiral infection (Figs 4 and 5); significantly higher expression levels of tgfbeta, il1beta, mip1alpha, il10, tnfalpha, and cox2 in liver (cox2, p < 0.05; other genes, p < 0.01; Fig 4) and of tgfbeta, il6, tnfalpha, and cox2 in lung (il6 and tnfalpha, p < 0.05; tgfbeta and cox2, p < 0.01; Fig 5) tissues were observed in the group infected with serovar Manilae as opposed to serovar Hebdomadis. The expression levels of il2, il4, and ifngamma were below the detection limit in all tissues in this round of infection experiments.

Fig 2. Quantification of expression of cytokine genes in the blood of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis at 96 h pi.

Fig 2

Cytokine gene expression in the blood of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled boxes) or Hebdomadis (open boxes) was quantified at 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). The bottom, median, and top lines of the box indicate the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively. The vertical line with whiskers shows the range of values. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each dot indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters. The dotted line indicates the expression level in control hamsters (for calibration). Data out of the range of values were excluded from statistical analysis. *, p < 0.05.

Fig 3. Quantification of cytokine gene expression in kidney tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis at 96 h pi.

Fig 3

Cytokine gene expression in kidney tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled boxes) or Hebdomadis (open boxes) was quantified at 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). The bottom, median, and top lines of the box indicate the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively. The vertical line with whiskers shows the range of values. The expression of cytokine genes in panel B was below the detection limit in control hamsters. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each circle indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters (A) or hamsters infected with serovar Hebdomadis (B). The dotted line indicates the expression level in control (A) or Hebdomadis-infected (B) hamsters. Data out of the range of values were excluded from statistical analysis.

Fig 4. Quantification of cytokine gene expression in liver tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis at 96 h pi.

Fig 4

Cytokine gene expression in liver tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled boxes) or Hebdomadis (open boxes) was quantified at 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). The bottom, median, and top lines of the box indicate the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively. The vertical line with whiskers shows the range of values. The expression of cytokine genes in panel B was below the detection limit in control hamsters. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each circle in the plots indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters (A) or hamsters infected with serovar Hebdomadis (B). The dotted line indicates the expression level in control (A) or Hebdomadis-infected (B) hamsters. Data out of the range of values were excluded from statistical analysis. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; in panel B, the asterisks indicate significant differences in ΔCt values (Ct value of target gene − Ct value of rpl18) between hamsters infected with serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis.

Fig 5. Quantification of cytokine gene expression in lung tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis at 96 h pi.

Fig 5

Cytokine gene expression in lung tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled boxes) or Hebdomadis (open boxes) was quantified at 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). The bottom, median, and top lines of the box indicate the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively. The vertical line with whiskers shows the range of values. The expression of cytokine genes in panel B was below the detection limit in control hamsters. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each circle in the plots indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters (A) or hamsters infected with serovar Hebdomadis (B). Dotted line indicates the expression level in control (A) or Hebdomadis-infected (B) hamsters. Data out of the range of values were excluded from statistical analysis. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; in panel B, the asterisks indicate significant differences in ΔCt values (Ct value of target gene − Ct value of rpl18) between hamsters infected with the serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis.

Discussion

The spectrum of clinical symptoms associated with human leptospirosis is extremely broad, ranging from asymptomatic or mild influenza-like illness to severe fatal disease [2, 4]. The broad range of disease severity has been attributed to differences in virulence determinants between various serotypes or genotypes of Leptospira spp. [1719]. Apart from acute incidental infection, each Leptospira serovar is usually associated with a particular maintenance host in which an associated serovar causes asymptomatic or only mild manifestation [2]. Several possible determinants of leptospirosis severity have been suggested though [9], the mechanism underlying the difference in virulence remains to be deciphered. In the present study, bacterial burden and cytokine expression profiles were compared between hamsters infected with strains belonging to the L. interrogans serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis.

The leptospiral burden in liver tissues was significantly higher in hamsters infected with serovar Manilae than those infected with serovar Hebdomadis (Fig 1). Two hundred nanograms of DNA extracted from hamster tissues is equivalent to approximately 150 μg of kidney and liver tissues and approximately 500 μg of lung tissues [23]. Thus, leptospiral burden per unit tissue weight was highest for the liver tissue. The average leptospiral genome copy numbers in blood and liver tissues of hamsters infected with serovar Manilae were 1,302 and 20,559, respectively, compared with 1,340 and 4,896, respectively, in hamsters infected with serovar Hebdomadis. Significant differences in leptospiral genome copy numbers were not observed between hamsters infected with serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis in blood, kidney, and lung tissues. These results indicate that L. interrogans serovar Manilae multiplied with greater efficiency in the liver tissue. The liver-specific macrophages, Kupffer cells (KCs), play a central role in pathogen elimination [24]. Previous studies reported the survival of pathogenic leptospires in KCs and macrophages from humans, rats, and guinea pigs [2527]. L. interrogans serovar Manilae strain was also capable of multiplying and escaping the action of mouse macrophages and was eliminated with lower efficiency ex vivo than a nonpathogenic strain of L. biflexa [28]. Therefore, L. interrogans serovar Manilae strain is presumed to possess the ability to escape the bactericidal action of KCs and multiply more efficiently in liver tissues than serovar Hebdomadis.

Previous studies demonstrated elevation in the levels of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in leptospirosis, which is more prominent in patients with severe disease [1015]. Several cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α, have been shown to be associated with the severity of the disease [1113]. In addition, experimental infection revealed significant elevation in the expression of tnfalpha, il1alpha, cox2, and il10 in the blood of dead hamsters compared with that of the survivors [16]. The present study also revealed upregulation of genes encoding both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in infected hamsters (Figs 2, 3, 4 and 5), which is similar to the scenario in human patients with severe leptospirosis as well as hamster models of leptospirosis. In addition, the expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as il6 in lungs, il10 in liver; tnfalpha in blood, liver, and lung tissues; and cox2 in liver and lungs, all of which are considered to be relevant to the severity of leptospirosis, were significantly higher in hamsters infected with serovar Manilae compared with serovar Hebdomadis (Figs 2, 3, 4 and 5; see Results section). These results suggest that both serovars of L. interrogans elicit systemic inflammatory response in hamsters, and the stronger induction of genes encoding inflammatory cytokines upon infection with serovar Manilae is responsible for the difference in virulence of these two serovars.

Several leptospiral factors are known to induce the production of cytokines or the expression of cytokine genes [2934]. Leptospiral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activates monocytes through Toll-like receptor 2, releasing inflammatory cytokines [29]. A recent report showed that L. interrogans serovar Lai altered the structure of lipid A, a constituent of LPS responsible for its toxicity, in human and murine macrophages; this resulted in differential cytokine gene expression [30]. Leptospiral lipoprotein LipL32 and hemolysins have been shown to induce inos, tnfalpha, and ccl2 expression in cultured mouse renal proximal tubule cells and IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α production in cultured human and murine macrophages [3133]. Injection of leptospiral glycoprotein GLP into mouse lung has been shown to trigger the production of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and MIP-1α [34]. The genome copy number of serovar Manilae was not significantly different from that of serovar Hebdomadis in blood, kidney, and lung. Therefore, differences in cytokine gene expression profile between hamsters infected with the serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis are likely to contribute to structural and/or quantitative differences in these molecules between the strains. In addition, the strain belonging to serovar Manilae could possess unique molecules that synergistically induce cytokine gene expression.

Histopathological changes were also observed in infected hamsters. Severe destruction of renal tubule cells was observed in the kidneys of hamsters infected with serovar Manilae (S7A–S7C Fig); however, significant differences were not observed in bacterial burden and cytokine gene expression profiles between hamsters infected with serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis (Fig 1). Hemorrhage was observed in the lungs of hamsters infected with serovar Manilae (S7G–S7I Fig); this group also exhibited significantly higher expression of certain cytokine genes than hamsters infected with serovar Hebdomadis (Fig 5). The experimental infection of hamsters with strains of L. interrogans serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae also resulted in pulmonary hemorrhage and elevated expression of tnfalpha and enos [6]. In addition, the level of serum TNF-α was higher in leptospirosis patients with pulmonary hemorrhage, and serum IL-6 level was associated with fatalities from severe pulmonary hemorrhage syndrome [11, 12]. However, in a mouse model of pulmonary hemorrhage, the expression of il1beta, tnfalpha, and tgfbeta was found to increase subsequent to hemorrhage [35]. Whether the upregulated expression of cytokine genes or increased cytokine production observed in the present as well as previous studies on human and experimental leptospirosis is a mediator or marker of pulmonary hemorrhage remains unclear. Moreover, bacterial burden in lung tissue was not significantly different between hamsters infected with serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis (Fig 1). These results suggest a serovar Manilae-specific virulence mechanism that provokes renal damage and pulmonary hemorrhage.

Although bacterial burden and expression of certain cytokine genes were significantly higher in the liver tissues of hamsters infected with serovar Manilae than serovar Hebdomadis (Figs 1 and 4), significant difference in lesions was not observed in the liver (S7D–S7F Fig). Therefore, damage to liver tissues is probably not attributable to the difference in pathogenesis between serovars Manilae and Hebdomadis.

There are some limitations in this study. The study compared the expression of the limited number of cytokine genes (12 genes) at a single time point and single infectious dose. Comparison of different challenge doses and different (later) time points as well as a broader range of cytokine genes would give more insight into immune response against leptospiral infection and immune evasion mechanisms by L. interrogans. There is a possibility that our data include animals that may have survive if not sacrificed. However, our previous studies demonstrate that 106 cells of the serovar Manilae strain is almost always fatal to hamsters but the serovar Hebdomadis is not.

In summary, the strain belonging to serovar Manilae multiplied with greater efficiency in liver tissues and induced higher expression of genes encoding both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines than serovar Hebdomadis even in tissues in which a significant difference in leptospiral load was not observed. The results obtained in this study suggest that the strain belonging to serovar Manilae possesses a unique virulence mechanism responsible for inducing severe damage to kidney and lung tissues. Elucidation of the underlying molecular mechanism is indispensable for understanding the pathogenesis of severe leptospirosis.

Supporting Information

S1 ARRIVE Guidelines Checklist

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Temporal changes in leptospiral DNA in tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Leptospiral DNA was quantified by real-time PCR targeting flaB in blood (A), kidney (B), liver (C), and lung (D) tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted DNA samples for each tissue of infected hamsters. Each circle indicates the average of two experiments.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in the blood of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Cytokine gene expression in the blood of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) was quantified at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each circle indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters. The dotted line indicates the expression level in control hamsters (for calibration).

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in kidney tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Cytokine gene expression in kidney tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) was quantified at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each circle indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters. The dotted line indicates the expression level in control hamsters (for calibration).

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in liver tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Cytokine gene expression in liver tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) was quantified at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each circle indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters. The dotted line indicates the expression level in control hamsters (for calibration).

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in lung tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Cytokine gene expression in lung tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) was quantified at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2–ΔΔCt method). Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster. Each circle indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters. The dotted line indicates the expression level in control hamsters (for calibration).

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Expression levels of cytokine genes in tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) were expressed as ΔCt (Ct value of target gene − Ct value of rpl18). (A) ΔCt of ip-10, il-6, and il-10 in blood at 72 and 96 h pi; (B) ΔCt of ip-10 in kidney tissues at 96 h pi; (C) ΔCt of il-6 in liver tissues at 96 h pi; and (D) ΔCt of il-10 in lung tissues at 72 and 96 h pi. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster. Each circle indicates the average of two experiments.

(PDF)

S7 Fig. Histological lesions in hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis at 96 h pi.

Hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained sections of kidney (A–C), liver (D–F), and lung (G–I) tissues from naïve (A, D and G), serovar Hebdomadis-infected (B, E and H) and serovar Manilae-infected (C, F and I) hamsters were microscopically observed. Arrows indicate urinary casts (B, C) and arterial blood (G–I). Asterisks indicate central vein (D–F) and edema (G–I). The dotted circle (I) indicates hemorrhage in lung tissue. Magnification: 200x (A–F), 100x (G–I).

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank M Suzuki for his valuable comments on statistical analysis.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25460557 for NK.

References

  • 1. Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Siozopoulou V, Christou L, Akritidis N. The globalization of leptospirosis: worldwide incidence trends. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12: 351–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz MM, Lovett MA, et al. Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;12: 757–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Faine S, Adler B, Bolin C, Perolat P. Leptospira and Leptospirosis. 2nd edn. Melbourne: MediSci; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lehmann JS, Matthias MA, Vinetz JM, Fouts DE. Leptospiral pathogenomics. Pathogens. 2014;3: 280–308. 10.3390/pathogens3020280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Trevejo RT, Rigau-Pérez JG, Ashford DA, McClure EM, Jarquín-González C, Amador JJ, et al. Epidemic leptospirosis associated with pulmonary hemorrhage-Nicaragua, 1995. J Infect Dis. 1998;178: 1457–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ashford DA, Kaiser RM, Spiegel RA, Perkins BA, Weyant RS, Bragg SL, et al. Asymptomatic infection and risk factors for leptospirosis in Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;63: 249–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bovet P, Yersin C, Merien F, Davis CE, Perolat P. Factors associated with clinical leptospirosis: a population-based case-control study in the Seychelles (Indian Ocean). Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28: 583–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Levett PN. Leptospirosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14: 296–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cachay ER, Vinetz JM. A global research agenda for leptospirosis. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51: 174–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Reis EA, Hagan JE, Ribeiro GS, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Martins-Filho OA, Montgomery RR, et al. Cytokine response signatures in disease progression and development of severe clinical outcomes for leptospirosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2457 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kyriakidis I, Samara P, Papa A. Serum TNF-α, sTNFR1, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 levels in Weil’s syndrome. Cytokine. 2011;54: 117–20. 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tajiki H, Salomão R. Association of plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha with severity of disease and mortality among patients with leptospirosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23: 1177–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tajiki MH, Satie Nakama A, Salomão R. The ratio of plasma levels of IL-10/TNF-alpha and its relationship to disease severity and survival in patients with leptospirosis. Braz J Infect Dis. 1997;1: 138–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wagenaar JF, Gasem MH, Goris MG, Leeflang M, Hartskeerl RA, van der Poll T, et al. Soluble ST2 levels are associated with bleeding in patients with severe leptospirosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3: e453 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wagenaar JF, Goris MG, Gasem MH, Isbandrio B, Moalli F, Mantovani A, et al. Long pentraxin PTX3 is associated with mortality and disease severity in severe Leptospirosis. J Infect. 2009;58: 425–32. 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vernel-Pauillac F, Goarant C. Differential cytokine gene expression according to outcome in a hamster model of leptospirosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4: e582 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kobayashi Y. Human leptospirosis: management and prognosis. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51: 201–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Gouveia EL, Metcalfe J, de Carvalho AL, Aires TS, Villasboas-Bisneto JC, Queirroz A, et al. Leptospirosis-associated severe pulmonary hemorrhagic syndrome, Salvador, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14: 505–8. 10.3201/eid1403.071064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Thaipadungpanit J, Wuthiekanun V, Chierakul W, Smythe LD, Petkanchanapong W, Limpaiboon R, et al. A dominant clone of Leptospira interrogans associated with an outbreak of human leptospirosis in Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007;1: e56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Koizumi N, Watanabe H. Identification of a novel antigen of pathogenic Leptospira spp. that reacted with convalescent mice sera. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52: 585–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Koizumi N, Watanabe H. Leptospiral immunoglobulin-like proteins elicit protective immunity. Vaccine. 2004;22: 1545–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nascimento AL, Verjovski-Almeida S, Van Sluys MA, Monteiro-Vitorello CB, Camargo LE, Digiampietri LA, et al. Genome features of Leptispira interrogans serovar Copenhageni. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2004;37: 459–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.DNeasy Blood & Tissue Handbook. Qiagen; 2006.
  • 24. Kolios G, Valatas V, Kouroumalis E. Role of Kupffer cells in the pathogenesis of liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12: 7413–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cinco M, Banfi E, Soranzo MR. Studies on the interaction between macrophages and leptospires. J Gen Microbiol. 1981;124: 409–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Cinco M, Domenis R, Perticarari S, Presani G, Marangoni A, Blasi E. Interaction of leptospires with murine microglial cells. New Microbiol. 2006;29: 193–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li S, Ojcius DM, Liao S, Li L, Xue F, Dong H, et al. Replication or death: distinct fates of pathogenic Leptospira strain Lai within macrophages of human or mouse origin. Innate Immun. 2010;16: 80–92. 10.1177/1753425909105580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Toma C, Okura N, Takayama C, Suzuki T. Characteristic features of intracellular pathogenic Leptospira in infected murine macrophages. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13: 1783–92. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01660.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Werts C, Tapping RI, Mathison JC, Chuang TH, Kravchenko V, Saint Girons I, et al. Leptospiral lipopolysaccharide activates cells through a TLR2-dependent mechanism. Nat Immunol. 2001;2: 346–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang CL, Hu WL, Sun AH, Yang XF, Ge YM, Fang JQ, et al. Elevation of lipopolysaccharide synthesis and structural change of lipid A for increasing virulence of Leptospira interrogans during infection of macrophages. 8th Scientific Meeting of International Leptospirosis Society; October 8th-11th, 2013; Fukuoka, Japan. International Leptospirosis Society; 2013. p. 45.
  • 31. Yang CW, Wu MS, Pan MJ, Hsieh WJ, Vandewalle A, Huang CC. The Leptospira outer membrane protein LipL32 induces tubulointerstitial nephritis-mediated gene expression in mouse proximal tubule cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13: 2037–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yang CW, Hung CC, Wu MS, Tian YC, Chang CT, Pan MJ, et al. Toll-like receptor 2 mediates early inflammation by leptospiral outermembrane proteins in proximal tubule cells. Kidney Int. 2006;69: 815–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang H, Wu Y, Ojcius DM, Yang XF, Zhang C, Ding S, et al. Leptospiral hemolysins induce proinflammatory cytokines through Toll-like receptor 2-and 4-mediated JNK and NF-κB signaling pathways. PLoS One. 2012;7: e42266 10.1371/journal.pone.0042266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque CF, Burth P, Silva AR, de Moraes IM, Oliveira FM, Santelli RE, et al. Murine lung injury caused by Leptospira interrogans glycolipoprotein, a specific Na/K-ATPase inhibitor. Respir Res. 2014;15: 93 10.1186/s12931-014-0093-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Le Tulzo Y, Shenkar R, Kaneko D, Moine P, Fantuzzi G, Dinarello CA, et al. Hemorrhage increases cytokine expression in lung mononuclear cells in mice: involvement of catecholamines in nuclear factor-kappaB regulation and cytokine expression. J Clin Invest. 1997;99: 1516–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zivcec M, Safronetz D, Haddock E, Feldmann H, Ebihara H. Validation of assays to monitor immune responses in the Syrian golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). J Immunol Methods. 2011;368: 24–35. 10.1016/j.jim.2011.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Matsui M, Rouleau V, Bruyère-Ostells L, Goarant C. Gene expression profiles of immune mediators and histopathological findings in animal models of leptospirosis: comparison between susceptible hamsters and resistant mice. Infect Immun. 2011;79: 4480–92. 10.1128/IAI.05727-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 ARRIVE Guidelines Checklist

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Temporal changes in leptospiral DNA in tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Leptospiral DNA was quantified by real-time PCR targeting flaB in blood (A), kidney (B), liver (C), and lung (D) tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted DNA samples for each tissue of infected hamsters. Each circle indicates the average of two experiments.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in the blood of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Cytokine gene expression in the blood of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) was quantified at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each circle indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters. The dotted line indicates the expression level in control hamsters (for calibration).

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in kidney tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Cytokine gene expression in kidney tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) was quantified at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each circle indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters. The dotted line indicates the expression level in control hamsters (for calibration).

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in liver tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Cytokine gene expression in liver tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) was quantified at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2−ΔΔCt method). Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster; each circle indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters. The dotted line indicates the expression level in control hamsters (for calibration).

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in lung tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Cytokine gene expression in lung tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) was quantified at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h pi using real-time PCR (2–ΔΔCt method). Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster. Each circle indicates the average of two experiments and gene expression relative to control hamsters. The dotted line indicates the expression level in control hamsters (for calibration).

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Temporal changes in cytokine gene expression in tissues of hamsters infected with strains of L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis.

Expression levels of cytokine genes in tissues of hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae (filled circles) or Hebdomadis (open circles) were expressed as ΔCt (Ct value of target gene − Ct value of rpl18). (A) ΔCt of ip-10, il-6, and il-10 in blood at 72 and 96 h pi; (B) ΔCt of ip-10 in kidney tissues at 96 h pi; (C) ΔCt of il-6 in liver tissues at 96 h pi; and (D) ΔCt of il-10 in lung tissues at 72 and 96 h pi. Experiments were performed in duplicate using two independently extracted RNA samples for each hamster. Each circle indicates the average of two experiments.

(PDF)

S7 Fig. Histological lesions in hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovars Manilae or Hebdomadis at 96 h pi.

Hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained sections of kidney (A–C), liver (D–F), and lung (G–I) tissues from naïve (A, D and G), serovar Hebdomadis-infected (B, E and H) and serovar Manilae-infected (C, F and I) hamsters were microscopically observed. Arrows indicate urinary casts (B, C) and arterial blood (G–I). Asterisks indicate central vein (D–F) and edema (G–I). The dotted circle (I) indicates hemorrhage in lung tissue. Magnification: 200x (A–F), 100x (G–I).

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES