Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2015 Jul 2;3:e1068. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1068

Metabolic syndrome in hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Evgeni Mekov 1,✉, Yanina Slavova 1, Adelina Tsakova 2, Marianka Genova 2, Dimitar Kostadinov 1, Delcho Minchev 1, Dora Marinova 1
Editor: Teresa Seccia
PMCID: PMC4493698  PMID: 26157632

Abstract

Introduction. The metabolic syndrome (MS) affects 21–53% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a higher prevalence in the early stages of COPD, with results being highly variable between studies. MS may also affect natural course of COPD—number of exacerbations, quality of life and lung function.

Aim. To examine the prevalence of MS and its correlation with comorbidities and COPD characteristics in patients with COPD admitted for exacerbation.

Material and methods. 152 patients with COPD admitted for exacerbation were studied for presence of MS. All of them were also assessed for vitamin D status and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM). Data were gathered for smoking status and exacerbations during the last year. All patients completed CAT (COPD assessment test) and mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea scale) questionnaires and underwent spirometry. Duration of current hospital stay was recorded.

Results. 25% of patients have MS. 23.1% of the male and 29.5% of the female patients have MS (p > 0.05). The prevalence of MS in this study is significantly lower when compared to a national representative study (44.6% in subjects over 45 years). 69.1% of all patients and 97.4% from MS patients have arterial hypertension. The presence of MS is associated with significantly worse cough and sleep (1st and 7th CAT questions; p = 0.002 and p = 0.001 respectively) and higher total CAT score (p = 0.017). Average BMI is 27.31. None of the patients have MS and BMI <25. There is a correlation between the presence of MS and DM (p = 0.008) and with the number of exacerbations in the last year (p = 0.015). There is no correlation between the presence of MS and the pulmonary function.

Conclusion. This study among hospitalized COPD patients finds comparable but relatively low prevalence of MS (25%) compared to previously published data (21–53%) and lower prevalence compared to general population (44.6%). MS may impact quality of life and the number of exacerbations of COPD. Having in mind that MS is more common in the early stages and decreases with COPD progression, the COPD patients admitted for exacerbation may be considered as having advanced COPD.

Keywords: Metabolic syndrome, COPD, Prevalence, Exacerbations, Quality of life

Introduction

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable disease with significant extrapulmonary effects that may contribute to the severity in individual patients. By 2030, COPD will be the fourth cause of mortality worldwide. The extrapulmonary comorbidities influence the prognosis of the patients with COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease , 2014).

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is common in patients with COPD. According to the available studies the prevalence of MS in COPD patients varies between 21–53% (Mekov & Slavova, 2013). The prevalence of MS in COPD patients is increased when compared to a control group (Funakoshi et al., 2010; Lam et al., 2010; Marquis et al., 2002; Park et al., 2012).

Available studies suggest that MS may have impact on quality of life (Ford & Li, 2008), lung function (Fimognari et al., 2007; Leone et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2006; Nakajima et al., 2008; Yeh et al., 2011), natural course of COPD (number of exacerbations) (Kupeli et al., 2010; Abdelghaffar et al., 2012) as well as to affect comorbidities in COPD patients (Mekov & Slavova, 2014).

Many studies examine prevalence of MS in COPD patients (Funakoshi et al., 2010; Lam et al., 2010; Park et al., 2012; Kupeli et al., 2010; Akpinar et al., 2012; Marquis et al., 2005; Minas et al., 2011; Ozgen Alpaydin et al., 2013; Poulain et al., 2008; Watz et al., 2009) with results being highly variable between studies. The prevalence of MS in an unselected Bulgarian population aged 20–80 years is 30.8%. The prevalence of MS for participants over 45 years (the most common age group for the COPD patients) is higher, 44.6% (Borissova et al., 2007). An epidemiological study conducted in Bulgaria in 3,598 COPD patients showed that metabolic syndrome is found in 13.8% of the patients (Pavlov et al., 2010). A more recent study indicates that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome is 41.8% in 141 patients with COPD compared to 39% in the control group of 103 subjects (Stratev et al., 2012). The prevalence of MS in COPD patients, hospitalized for exacerbation is hard to predict because MS tends to be more prevalent in early stages of COPD while patients experiencing severe exacerbation often have advanced disease. On the other side, MS may impact natural course of COPD and predispose to exacerbation which will lead to increased prevalence of MS in this group.

There is not enough data to determine whether the results from these studies are applicable to specific subgroups of patients, such as COPD patients admitted for exacerbation. COPD is increasingly divided in subgroups or phenotypes based on specific features and association with prognosis or response to therapy, the most notable being the feature of frequent exacerbations (Vestbo, 2014). The presence of MS may also have distinctive characteristics for this subgroup (‘severe’ exacerbator phenotype). The aim of this study is to find out the prevalence of MS in patients with COPD admitted for exacerbation and the correlations of presence of MS with comorbidities and COPD characteristics.

Material and Methods

A total of 152 COPD patients hospitalized for exacerbation were studied for the presence of MS, DM, and vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency using well-established criteria for:

  • •

    Presence of MS: at least 3 of the following: 1. Elevated waist circumference >102 cm in males, >88 cm in females; 2. Triglycerides >1.7 mmol/L (or on therapy); 3. HDL <1.0 mmol/L in males, <1.3 mmol/L in females (or on therapy); 4. Elevated blood pressure: systolic ≥130 and/or diastolic ≥85 mm Hg (or on therapy); 5. Fasting glucose >5.5 mmol/L (or on therapy) (Alberti et al., 2009).

  • •

    Presence of DM: fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L OR 2-h plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) OR HbA1c≥6.5% OR on therapy (American Diabetes Association, 2012);

  • •

    Presence of prediabetes: fasting plasma glucose 5.6–6.9 mmol/L OR 2-h plasma glucose 7.8–11.0 mmol/L during an OGTT OR HbA1c 5.7–6.4% (American Diabetes Association, 2012);

  • •

    Presence of vitamin D deficiency: 25(OH)D <25 nmol/L; vitamin D insufficiency: 25(OH)D 25–50 nmol/L; vitamin D sufficiency: >50 nmol/L (Borissova et al., 2012).

The diagnosis of COPD was made according to GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) criteria (DM1). Data were gathered for age, sex, smoking status and number of pack-years, number of bone fractures, therapy for arterial hypertension, therapy for DM, COPD therapy and number of exacerbations in the last year. The patients completed CAT and mMRC questionnaires and underwent pre- and post bronchodilatatory spirometry. Blood pressure was obtained according to the American Heart Association Guidelines (Pickering et al., 2005). A patient was considered as having arterial hypertension if taking antihypertensives.

The inclusion criteria were post bronchodilator spirometry obstruction defined as FEV1/FVC<0.70. All participants in this study signed informed consent.

The exclusion criteria were failure to comply with study procedures (no completed questionnaires, no medical and demographic information, no spirometry, no lab tests) or FEV1/FVC ratio >0.70 after administration of bronchodilator.

Smoking status

Every participant was classified according to smoking status (Schoenborn & Adams, 2010):

Never smoker—never smoked a cigarette or who smoked fewer than 100 cigarettes in their entire lifetime.

Former smoker—smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their entire life but were not currently smoking.

Current smoker—had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their entire life and were still smoking.

Numbers of pack-years were calculated using the formula:

Number of pack-years=years of smoking×number of daily smoked cigarettes/20.

Anthropometric indices

Body weight and height were measured and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight by height squared (kg/m2). According to BMI all patients were classified as underweight (<18.5), normal (18.5–24.99), overweight (25–29.99) and obese (>30). Waist circumference was measured at the approximate midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest according to the WHO STEPS protocol (WHO, 2008). Hip circumference was measured around the widest portion of the buttocks (WHO, 2008). Body adiposity index (BAI) was calculated as:

Hip circumference (in cm)/ (Height (in m) X√Height)−18.

COPD exacerbations and duration of hospital stay

Data were gathered for number of severe exacerbations (hospitalizations) and moderate exacerbations (antibiotic or/and systemic steroid treatment without hospitalization due to worsening of pulmonary symptoms) (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease , 2014) in the previous year. The duration of the current hospital stay was recorded.

Quality of life

Quality of life was assessed with the mMRC scale and CAT questionnaire. Patients were instructed that there were no right or wrong answers. All patients’ questions were answered. Patients were classified according to GOLD as having less symptoms (CAT < 10) and breathlessness (mMRC grade 0–1) and more symptoms (CAT ≥ 10) and breathlessness (mMRC grade ≥ 2). Because all patients were hospitalized due to exacerbation there were only group C (high risk, less symptoms) and group D (high risk, more symptoms) patients according to GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease , 2014).

Pulmonary function testing

The spirometry was performed using Minispir® New spirometer (MIR—Medical International Research, Rome, Italy). Patients were instructed to withdraw using short-acting β2-agonists at least 6 h, long-acting β2-agonist at least 12 h, long acting muscarinic antagonist 24 h and short acting muscarinic antagonist 12 h before the spirometry (Miller et al., 2005). Post bronchodilator spirometry testing was performed 15–30 min after inhalation of 400mcg Salbutamol according to ERS/ATS recommendations (Miller et al., 2005). Pre- and post- values were obtained for: FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEV6, FEV1/FEV6, PEF, FEF2575, FEV3, FEV3/FVC as well as the difference between post/pre values (delta values). GLI (Global Lungs Initiative) predicted values were used (GLI-2012). Patient’s obstruction was classified according to the severity of airflow limitation based on post-bronchodilator FEV1 as follows: mild (≥80% predicted); moderate (80>FEV1 ≥ 50% predicted); severe (50%>FEV1≥30% predicted); very severe (<30% predicted) (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease , 2014).

Blood samples and analyses

A venous blood sample was collected from each subject after a 12-h fasting. Blood samples were taken as late as possible before discharging (usually on 6th or 7th day). Plasma glucose, triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), and total cholesterol (tChol) were measured with a Roche COBAS INTEGRA® 400 plus analyzer and an enzymatic colorimetric assay and blood glucose was measured with an enzymatic reference method with hexokinase. Vitamin D was measured with Elecsys 2010 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and Electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured with a NycoCard device and boronate affinity assay. For patients without established DM a 75 g OGTT was performed with blood samples for glucose taken on first and second hour.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS for Windows software, version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation and 95 Confidence intervals (95%CI) and categorical variables—as percentages. Chi-square test was used to determine the associations between categorical variables. Continuous variables were examined for normality by Shapiro–Wilk test. For normally distributed variables, differences between the groups were determined by independent-samples T test for two samples and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for more than 2 samples. Mann–Whitney U test was used for abnormally distributed variables with 2 samples and Kruskal-Wallis test for variables with more than 2 samples. Regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for presence of MS or the consequences of having MS. Significance value (p-value) was set at 0.05.

All patients signed informed consent. Medical University-Sofia Research Ethics Commission approved the study (#2976/2014).

Results

Sample characteristics

A total of 152 COPD patients admitted for exacerbation were recruited from University Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Pulmonary Diseases ‘Saint Sofia,’ Sofia, Bulgaria. Mean age of patients in this study was 65 ± 10 years. 71.1% (108/152) were males, 28.9% (44/152) were females; mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 was 55.3 ± 19.5%. 15.8% from the patients were never smokers, 57.9%—former smokers and 26.3%—current smokers. 127 patients (83.6%) were receiving inhalatory corticosteroids.

Prevalence of MS

25.0% (38/152) of the patients have MS. 23.1% (25/108) of males have MS vs. 29.5% (13/44) of females but this difference is not statistically significant (Table 1). Mean age does not differ between the patients with and without MS.

Table 1. Prevalence of MS according to different factors.

% MS P value
All 25.0
Sex
Male 23.1 P = 0.409
Female 29.5
Smoking status
Never 25.0 P = 0.678
Former 27.3
Current 20.0
ICS use
Yes 25.2 P = 0.899
No 24.0
Arterial hypertension
Yes 35.2 P<0.0005
No 2.1
Vitamin D status
>50 nmol/l 24.2 P = 0.929
25–50 nmol/l 24.6
<25 nmol/l 28.0
DM
Yes 37.7 P=0.008
No 18.2
BMI
Underweight 0 P<0.0005
Normal 0
Overweight 27.3
Obese 54.8
BAI
Underweight 0 P = 0.001
Normal 17.5
Overweight 28.9
Obese 50.0
Quality of life
CAT 0–9 16.0 P = 0.256
CAT ≥ 10 26.8
mMRC 0 or 1 18.9 P= 0.201
mMRC ≥ 2 28.3
FEV1
FEV1≥50% 21.3 P = 0.390
FEV1<50% 27.5
FEV1≥80% 11.8 P = 0.852
80%>FEV1≥50% 28.8
50%>FEV1≥30% 26.1
FEV1<30% 25.0

Fulfilled criteria for MS (in all and in MS patients) are shown in Table 2. Virtually all (37/38) patients with MS in this study have arterial hypertension, followed by elevated waist circumference (33/38). Arterial hypertension has greatest sensitivity for predicting presence of MS, but is not specific. Elevated waist circumference has greatest accuracy, defined as sum of true results (true positives and true negatives) divided by total number of cases. Number of fulfilled criteria in all patients is given in Table 3.

Table 2. Fulfilled criteria for MS.

MS criteria All patients (n = 152) MS only (n = 38) Without MS (n = 114) Accuracy
Elevated blood pressure: systolic ≥130 and/or diastolic ≥85 mm Hg (or on therapy) 69.1% (n = 105) 97.4% (n = 37) 59.6% (n = 68) 54.6%
Elevated waist circumference >102 cm in males, >88 cm in females 28.3% (n = 43) 86.8% (n = 33) 8.8% (n = 10) 90.1%
Triglycerides >1.7 mmol/L (or on therapy) 29.6% (n = 45) 60.5% (n = 23) 19.3% (n = 22) 75.7%
Fasting glucose >5,5 mmol/L (or on therapy) 34.2% (n = 52) 65.8% (n = 25) 23.7% (n = 27) 73.7%
HDL <1.0 mmol/L in males, <1.3 mmol/L in females (or on therapy) 15.8% (n = 24) 39.5% (n = 15) 7.9% (n = 9) 78.9%

Table 3. Number of fulfilled criteria for MS in all patients.

Number of fulfilled criteria % n
0 13.8 21
1 33.6 51
2 27.6 42
3 13.2 20
4 10.5 16
5 1.3 2

Lifestyle factors

Our study did not find significant differences in prevalence of MS according to smoking status and number of pack-years. Treatment with inhalatory corticosteroids (ICS) is not risk factor for MS. Fasting glucose level are not influenced by ICS (all p > 0.05) (Table 1).

Comorbidity

In our study, vitamin D levels do not significantly differ in relation to presence of MS (32.11 vs. 31.92 nmol/l). The presence of MS is also not related to vitamin D status (Table 1).

Number of fractures in our study does not significantly differ regarding the presence of MS. Presence of at least one fracture also does not differ significantly in relation to presence of MS.

In our study there is a correlation between the presence of MS and DM. 52.6% (20/38) from patients with MS have DM. BMI and BAI differ significantly according to presence of MS—32.51 vs. 25.58, for BMI and 31.01 vs. 25.58, for BAI. There is also significant difference in prevalence of MS in BMI and BAI groups (Table 1). It is notable that none of the patients have MS and BMI < 25 (Table 1).

Linear regression showed presence of MS as risk factor for higher BMI (R = 0.542, r2 = 0.293, p < 0.0005, B = 6.928, 95% CI [5.193–8.662]) and BAI (R = 0.406, r2 = 0.165, p < 0.0005, B = 5.423, 95% CI [3.455–7.392]).

A logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict presence of MS in a relation to presence of other comorbidities. Presence of DM slightly improves the model (chi square = 6.818, p = 0.009 with df = 1). Nagelkerke’s R2 of 0.065 indicates a weak relationship. Odds ratio was 2.73. Vitamin D status does not improve the model (p > 0.05).

Exacerbations and duration of hospital stay

Our study found a significant difference between the number of total exacerbations according to the presence of MS (Table 4, p = 0.015). The number of severe exacerbation, moderate exacerbation and duration of hospital stay did not reach significance.

Table 4. Number of exacerbations in previous year and duration of hospital stay.

No MS MS
Moderate exacerbations 0,61 (0,49–0,76) 0,92 (0,59–1,34)
Severe exacerbations 1,79 (1,61–1,97) 2,08 (1,71–2,50)
All exacerbations 2,40 (2,19–2,61) 3,00 (2,56–3,52)
Hospital stay (in days) 7,47 (7,24–7,70) 7,63 (7,28–8,05)

Triglycerides and blood glucose levels in our study did not correlate with number of exacerbations.

Linear regression showed presence of MS as risk factor for higher number of exacerbations (R = 0.207, r2 = 0.043, p = 0.010, B = 0.596, 95% CI [0.143–1.050]). From the MS components presence of arterial hypertension is strongest risk factor for exacerbation (R = 0.228, r2 = 0.052, p = 0.005, B = 0.615, 95% CI [0.192–1.038]).

Quality of life

The presence of MS is associated with significantly worse cough and sleep (1st and 7th CAT questions; p = 0.002 and p = 0.001 respectively) and higher total CAT score (p = 0.017) (Table 5). However prevalence of MS is not significantly different between patients with less symptoms (CAT 0–9) and breathlessness (mMRC 0 or 1) compared to patients with more symptoms (CAT ≥ 10) and breathlessness (mMRC ≥ 2) (Table 1).

Table 5. Mean CAT score on every question and in total according to presence of MS.

MS Mean CAT score N P value
MS—no CAT1 1.95 114 P=0.002
MS—yes CAT1 2.63 38
MS—no CAT2 1.92 114 P = 0.063
MS—yes CAT2 2.34 38
MS—no CAT3 2.54 114 P = 0.092
MS—yes CAT3 2.97 38
MS—no CAT4 3.52 114 P = 0.361
MS—yes CAT4 3.74 38
MS—no CAT5 1.23 114 P = 0.198
MS—yes CAT5 1.66 38
MS—no CAT6 1.54 114 P = 0.695
MS—yes CAT6 1.68 38
MS—no CAT7 1.28 114 P=0.001
MS—yes CAT7 2.21 38
MS—no CAT8 2.62 114 P = 0.068
MS—yes CAT8 3.08 38
MS—no Total CAT 16.61 114 P = 0.017
MS—yes Total CAT 20.32 38

Regression analyses also showed that MS is a risk factor for reduced quality of life, measured with total CAT score (R = 0.205, r2 = 0.042, p = 0.011, B = 3.711, 95% CI [0.859–6.562]). Presence of MS also impairs cough and sleep—first (R = 0.285, r2 = 0.081, p < 0.0005, B = 0.684, 95% CI [0.313–1.055]) and seventh (R = 0.268, r2 = 0.072, p = 0.001, B = 0.930, 95% CI [0.390–1.470]) CAT questions.

Pulmonary function test (PFT)

Our study did not find differences in FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEV6, FEV1/FEV6, PEF, FEF2575 and FEV3 according to the presence of MS. It should be noted that there is tendency for FVC and FEV1/FVC ratio. However, because of this there is significant difference in FEV3/FVC ratio (Table 6).

Table 6. Mean PFT values.

MS Mean PFT value N P value
No FEV1 55.56% 114 P = 0.811
Yes FEV1 54.68% 38
No FVC 80.46% 114 P = 0.094
Yes FVC 72.45% 38
No FEV1/FVC 0.53 114 P = 0.091
Yes FEV1/FVC 0.57 38
No FEV6 73.89% 114 P = 0.277
Yes FEV6 68.63% 38
No FEV1/FEV6 0.57 114 P = 0.107
Yes FEV1/FEV6 0.61 38
No PEF 55.62% 114 P = 0.735
Yes PEF 56.66% 38
No FEF2575 38.89% 114 P = 0.316
Yes FEF2575 40.95% 38
No FEV3 66.62% 114 P = 0.601
Yes FEV3 63.89% 38
No FEV3/FVC 0.81 114 P =0.033
Yes FEV3/FVC 0.85 38

Regression analyses also showed that MS is not a risk factor for reduced pulmonary function. However some of the components of MS are associated with reduced pulmonary function with highest impact of HDL on FVC (R = 0.183, r2 = 0.033, p = 0.024, B = − 8.517, 95% CI [−15.904–−1.130]) and FEV1 (R = 0.251, r2 = 0.063, p = 0.001, B = − 10.391, 95% CI [−16.865–−3.918]). Fasting glucose is associated with increased FEV1/FVC ratio (R = 0.186, r2 =0.035, p = 0.022, B = 1.238, 95% CI [0.183–2.294]) probably because of lowering FVC.

There is no difference in prevalence of MS in patients with FEV1 <50%, when compared to patients with FEV1 >50% or regarding GOLD stage (Table 1).

Discussion

This study found comparable but relatively low prevalence of MS compared to previous studies (Table 7) (Fig. 1). The prevalence of MS in our study is significantly lower when compared to the general Bulgarian population (44.6% in subjects over 45 years) (Borissova et al., 2007). The odds ratio for COPD patients admitted for exacerbation of having MS is 0.41 compared to general population (95% CI [0.28–0.61], p < 0.0005).

Table 7. Prevalence of MS in patients with COPD.

Authors N Studied population Prevalence of MS
Akpinar et al., 2012 133 Patients with COPD and controls 44.6%
Funakoshi et al., 2010 7.189 Men aged 45–88 years 16.8%, OR 0.72 (95% CI [0.51–1.02]) in GOLD I; 28.7%, OR 1.33 (95% CI [1.01–1.76]) in GOLD II–IV
Kupeli et al., 2010 106 Hospitalized patients with COPD 27.3%
Lam et al., 2010 7.358 General population >50 years 22.6%; OR 1.47 (95% CI [1.12–1.92])
Marquis et al., 2005 72 Patients with COPD and controls 47%
Minas et al., 2011 114 Men with COPD 21%
Ozgen Alpaydin et al., 2013 90 Patients with COPD and controls 43%
Park et al., 2012 1.215 Patients with COPD and controls >40 years 33% vs. 22.2% for men; 48.5% vs. 29.6% for women OR 2.03 (95% CI [1.08–3.80])
Poulain et al., 2008 28 Patients with COPD Overweight—50%; Normal weight—0%.
Watz et al., 2009 200 Patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis GOLD I—50%; GOLD II—53%; GOLD III—37%; GOLD IV—44%; Chronic bronchitis—53%

Figure 1. Prevalence of MS in COPD patients.

Figure 1

Two Bulgarian studies examined the prevalence of MS in COPD patients. An epidemiological study conducted in Bulgaria in COPD patients reported a prevalence of 13.8%. These results differ significantly from the literature data probably because of the different criteria for metabolic syndrome (presence of DM, BMI >30 and blood pressure >140/90 mmHg) which makes data comparing irrelevant (Pavlov et al., 2010). A more recent study indicates that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome is 41.8% in patients with COPD . However, this study was not conducted using a random sample (exclusion criteria was presence of DM, people were aged 49–79 years for patients with COPD and 35–65 years for controls) (Stratev et al., 2012). Nonetheless it uses similar criteria for MS and when comparing the results our study finds lower prevalence of MS.

The prevalence results could be explained with differences between the populations in different studies (physical activity, diet, lifestyle etc.). For example, Bulgaria is low-income country, which may impact diet preferences and treatment choices. Furthermore, patients in this study had been hospitalized due to exacerbation, which represents the most severe group of COPD patients. Having in mind that MS is more common in the early stages and decreases with COPD progression (Watz et al., 2009), COPD patients hospitalized for exacerbation may be considered as having advanced COPD.

According to the NHANES III study, smokers are more likely to develop MS than nonsmokers in general population, and the risk increases with the number of pack-years even after adjusting for covariates (Park et al., 2003). Our study did not find significant differences in prevalence of MS according to smoking status and number of pack-years. These results could be explained with smoke being the biggest factor in developing COPD and effect of developing MS could be reduced. Moreover nicotine may be an appetite suppressant and lower the weight thus decreasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome (Chiolero et al., 2008). Third, hospitalized COPD patients are patients with predominantly advanced disease and prone to cachexia and wasting. Also, lifestyle changes (quiting smoking) in the presence of the two diseases should be considered which may change the prevalence of MS.

Treatment with inhalatory corticosteroids (ICS) is not risk factor for MS similar to findings for DM (O’Byrne et al., 2012) and fasting glucose level are not influenced by ICS.

COPD is a disease that affects mainly the lungs, but is characterized by systemic inflammation and a number of extrapulmonary manifestations. Only 1/3 of patients with COPD die due to respiratory failure. Main cause of death is lung cancer and cardiovascular complications (Calverley et al., 2007).

The vast majority of patients with COPD have a vitamin D deficiency (Romme et al., 2013). Aside from its role in the metabolism of calcium and phosphorus, vitamin D is involved in the pathogenesis of multiple diseases, including MS, mainly because it affects the secretion and the function of insulin (Ju, Jeong & Kim, 2014). However, in our study vitamin D levels do not significantly differ in relation to presence of MS. Presence of MS is also not related to vitamin D status.

There are no studies that examine the relationship between osteoporosis and MS in patients with COPD. However, both diseases share common risk factors such as smoking, lack of physical activity, and treatment with corticosteroids. Some of the components of the metabolic syndrome (arterial hypertension, elevated triglycerides, reduced HDL cholesterol) are risk factors for low bone density. Systemic inflammation in MS plays a role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis (McFarlane, 2006). On the other hand, studies examining the relationship between MS and osteoporosis showed inconsistent results, probably due to the protective effect of obesity (Zhou et al., 2013). However, the number of fractures in our study does not significantly differ regarding the presence of MS. The presence of at least one fracture also does not differ significantly in relation to presence of MS.

Most patients with DM have MS, but the opposite is not necessarily true (Ginsberg & Stalenhoef, 2003). The presence of MS in this study is associated with presence of DM, higher BMI and BAI.

Hyperglycemia is associated with elevated glucose concentrations in tissues and bronchial aspirates where it may stimulate infection by enhancing bacterial growth and by promoting bacterial interaction with the airway epithelium (Brennan et al., 2007). Hyperglycemia also impairs both innate and adaptive immunity, suppressing the host response to infection.

The presence of MS in patients with COPD increases the frequency of exacerbations (2.4 vs. 0.7) and their duration–(7.5 vs. 5.0 days) according to Kupeli et al. (2010), and 8 versus 5.5 days, according to Abdelghaffar et al. (2012). Our study found a significant difference between the number of total exacerbations according to the presence of MS. However, the number of severe exacerbation, moderate exacerbation and duration of hospital stay did not differ significantly. Triglycerides and blood glucose levels in our study did not correlate with number of exacerbations as reported by other authors (Kupeli et al., 2010).

The presence of MS is associated with significantly worse cough and sleep and higher total CAT score. This confirms the data about reduced quality of life in patients with MS (Ford & Li, 2008). However, the prevalence of MS is not significantly different between patients with less symptoms (CAT 0–9) and breathlessness (mMRC 0 or 1) compared to patients with more symptoms (CAT ≥10) and breathlessness (mMRC ≥2). These mixed results may be explained with COPD having higher negative impact on quality of life than MS (physical limitation due to shortness of breath) as suggested for DM (Arne, Janson & Janson, 2009), and ameliorating the effect in patients having both diseases.

COPD is characterized by airflow obstruction, which is not fully reversible. MS is associated with a reduction of lung volumes (Fimognari et al., 2007; Leone et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2006; Nakajima et al., 2008; Yeh et al., 2011). It should be noted that some studies found no association between lung function and the presence of MS (Yamamoto et al., 2014). MS in our study is not associated with worsen pulmonary function. There is also no difference in prevalence of MS in patients with FEV1 <50%, when compared to patients with FEV1 >50% or regarding GOLD stage.

Conclusions

This study finds a 25% prevalence of MS in COPD patients admitted for exacerbation, which is significantly lower than the general population. MS is more prevalent in females, but the gender difference is not statistically significant. In this study, most of the patients are former smokers, and the prevalence of MS does not differ regarding smoking status and treatment with ICS.

The presence of MS is associated with the presence of DM, higher BMI and BAI, more exacerbations during the previous year and lower quality of life. MS is not associated with increased hospital stay and lower pulmonary function.

This study finds comparable but relatively low prevalence of MS compared to previously published data (21–53%). As MS is more common in the early stages and decreases with COPD progression, the COPD patients admitted for exacerbation may be considered as having advanced COPD.

Funding Statement

This manuscript is part of a PhD project, which is partially funded by Medical University—Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria (grant number 15-D/2014, project number 22-D/2014). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Evgeni Mekov conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Yanina Slavova conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Adelina Tsakova and Marianka Genova performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Dimitar Kostadinov and Delcho Minchev contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Dora Marinova contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Medical University-Sofia Research Ethics Commission approved the study (#2976/2014).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

http://figshare.com/articles/MS_in_COPD/1439301.

References

  • Abdelghaffar et al. (2012).Abdelghaffar H, Tangour E, Fenniche S, Fekih L, Greb D, Akrout I, Hassene H, Ben Hamad W, Kammoun H, Belhabib D, Megdiche M. Relation between metabolic syndrome and acute exacerbation of COPD. European Respiratory Journal. 2012;40(Suppl. 56):886s.. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00197511. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Akpinar et al. (2012).Akpinar EE, Akpinar S, Ertek S, Sayin E, Gulhan M. Systemic inflammation and metabolic syndrome in stable COPD patients. Tuberk Toraks. 2012;60(3):230–237. doi: 10.5578/tt.4018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alberti et al. (2009).Alberti KGMM, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Fruchart J-C, James PT, Loria CM, Smith SC., Jr Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640–1645. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • American Diabetes Association (2012).American Diabetes Association Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:S64–S71. doi: 10.2337/dc12-s064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Arne, Janson & Janson (2009).Arne M, Janson C, Janson S. Physical activity and quality of life in subjects with chronic disease: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared with rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2009;27(3):141–147. doi: 10.1080/02813430902808643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Borissova et al. (2007).Borissova A-M, Kovatcheva R, Shinkov A, Atanassova I, Vukov M, Aslanova N, Vlahov J, Dakovska L. Prevalence and features of the metabolic syndrome in unselected Bulgarian population. Endocrinologia. 2007;12(2):68–77. [Google Scholar]
  • Borissova et al. (2012).Borissova A-M, Shinkov A, Vlahov J, Dakovska L, Todorov L, Svinarov D, Kasabova L. Determination of the optimal level of 25(OH)D in the Bulgarian population. Endocrinologia. 2012;17(3):135–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Brennan et al. (2007).Brennan AL, Gyi KM, Wood DM, Johnson J, Holliman R, Baines DL, Philips BJ, Geddes DM, Hodson ME, Baker EH. Airway glucose concentrations and effect on growth of respiratory pathogens in cystic fibrosis. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2007;6:101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2006.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Calverley et al. (2007).Calverley PM, Anderson JA, Celli B, Ferguson G, Jenkins C, Jones P, Yates J, Vestbo J. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;356:775–789. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chiolero et al. (2008).Chiolero A, Faeh D, Paccaud F, Cornuz J. Consequences of smoking for body weight, body fat distribution, and insulin resistance. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008;87(4):801–809. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.4.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fimognari et al. (2007).Fimognari FL, Pasqualetti P, Moro L, Franco A, Piccirillo G, Pastorelli R, Rossini PM, Incalzi RA. The association between metabolic syndrome and restrictive ventilatory dysfunction in older persons. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2007;62:760–765. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ford & Li (2008).Ford E, Li C. Metabolic syndrome and health-related quality of life among U.S. adults. Annals of Epidemiology. 2008;18(3):165–171. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Funakoshi et al. (2010).Funakoshi Y, Omori H, Mihara S, Marubayashi T, Katoh T. Association between airflow obstruction and the metabolic syndrome or its components in Japanese men. Internal Medicine. 2010;49:2093–2099. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.3882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ginsberg & Stalenhoef (2003).Ginsberg HN, Stalenhoef AF. The metabolic syndrome: targeting dyslipidaemia to reduce coronary risk. Journal of Cardiovascular Risk. 2003;10:121–128. doi: 10.1097/00043798-200304000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (2014).Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2014. Available at http://www.goldcopd.org/ (accessed 20 April 2015)
  • Ju, Jeong & Kim (2014).Ju S, Jeong H, Kim H. Blood vitamin D status and metabolic syndrome in the general adult population: a dose–response meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014;99(3):1053–1063. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kupeli et al. (2010).Kupeli E, Ulubay G, Ulasli SS, Sahin T, Erayman Z, Gursoy A. Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of acute exacerbation of COPD: a preliminary study. Endocrine. 2010;38:76–82. doi: 10.1007/s12020-010-9351-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lam et al. (2010).Lam KB, Jordan RE, Jiang CQ, Thomas GN, Miller MR, Zhang WS, Lam TH, Cheng KK, Adab P. Airflow obstruction and metabolic syndrome: the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. European Respiratory Journal. 2010;35:317–323. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00024709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leone et al. (2009).Leone N, Courbon D, Thomas F, Bean K, Jego B, Leynaert B, Guize L, Zureik M. Lung function impairment and metabolic syndrome: the critical role of abdominal obesity. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2009;179:509–516. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200807-1195OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin et al. (2006).Lin WY, Yao CA, Wang HC, Huang KC. Impaired lung function is associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome in adults. Obesity. 2006;14:1654–1661. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marquis et al. (2002).Marquis K, Debigare R, Lacasse Y, LeBlanc P, Jobin J, Carrier G, Maltais F. Midthigh muscle cross-sectional area is a better predictor of mortality than body mass index in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2002;166:809–813. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marquis et al. (2005).Marquis K, Maltais F, Duguay V, Bezeau AM, LeBlanc P, Jobin J, Poirier P. The metabolic syndrome in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation. 2005;25:226–232. doi: 10.1097/00008483-200507000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McFarlane (2006).McFarlane SI. Bone metabolism and the cardiometabolic syndrome: pathophysiologic insights. Journal of the CardioMetabolic Syndrome. 2006;1:53–57. doi: 10.1111/j.0197-3118.2006.05457.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mekov & Slavova (2013).Mekov E, Slavova Y. Diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome in COPD—part 1: introduction and epidemiology. Thoracic Medicine. 2013;5(4):6–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Mekov & Slavova (2014).Mekov E, Slavova Y. Diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome in COPD—part 3: consequences. Thoracic Medicine. 2014;6(4):23–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller et al. (2005).Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, Van der Grinten C, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson D, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen O, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J. Standardisation of spirometry. European Respiratory Journal. 2005;26:319–338. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Minas et al. (2011).Minas M, Kostikas K, Papaioannou AI, Mystridou P, Karetsi E, Georgoulias P, Liakos N, Pournaras S, Gourgoulianis KI. The association of metabolic syndrome with adipose tissue hormones and insulin resistance in patients with COPD without co-morbidities. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2011;8:414–420. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2011.619600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakajima et al. (2008).Nakajima K, Kubouchi Y, Muneyuki T, Ebata M, Eguchi S, Munakata H. A possible association between suspected restrictive pattern as assessed by ordinary pulmonary function test and the metabolic syndrome. Chest. 2008;134:712–718. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-3003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • O’Byrne et al. (2012).O’Byrne PM, Rennard S, Gerstein H, Radner F, Peterson S, Lindberg B, Carlsson LG, Sin DD. Risk of new onset diabetes mellitus in patients with asthma or COPD taking inhaled corticosteroids. Respiratory Medicine. 2012;106(11):1487–1493. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ozgen Alpaydin et al. (2013).Ozgen Alpaydin A, Konyar Arslan I, Serter S, Sakar Coskun A, Celik P, Taneli F, Yorgancioglu A. Metabolic syndrome and carotid intima-media thickness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine. 2013;8(1):61. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-8-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Park et al. (2012).Park BH, Park MS, Chang J, Kim SK, Kang YA, Jung JY, Kim YS, Kim C. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and metabolic syndrome: a nationwide survey in Korea. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2012;16:694–700. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Park et al. (2003).Park Y-W, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon M, Heymsfield S. The metabolic syndrome prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988–1994. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2003;163(4):427–436. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.4.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlov et al. (2010).Pavlov P, Ivanov Y, Glogovska P, Popova T, Borissova E, Hristova P. Metabolic syndrome and COPD. European Respiratory Journal. 2010;36(Suppl. 54):66s. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering et al. (2005).Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ. Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans. Hypertension. 2005;45:142–161. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000150859.47929.8e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poulain et al. (2008).Poulain M, Doucet M, Drapeau V, Fournier G, Tremblay A, Poirier P, Maltais F. Metabolic and inflammatory profile in obese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Respiratory Disease. 2008;5:35–41. doi: 10.1177/1479972307087205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Romme et al. (2013).Romme EA, Rutten EP, Smeenk FW, Spruit MA, Menheere PP, Wouters EF. Vitamin D status is associated with bone mineral density and functional exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Annals of Medicine. 2013;45(1):91–96. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2012.671536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schoenborn & Adams (2010).Schoenborn CA, Adams PF. Health behaviors of adults: United States, 2005–2007. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics. 2010;10(245):79–80. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_245.pdf . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stratev et al. (2012).Stratev V, Petev J, Galcheva S, Peneva M. Chronic inflammation and metabolic syndrome (MS) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Thoracic Medicine. 2012;4(3):50–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Vestbo (2014).Vestbo J. COPD: definition and phenotypes. Clinics in Chest Medicine. 2014;35(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2013.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Watz et al. (2009).Watz H, Waschki B, Kirsten A, Muller KC, Kretschmar G, Meyer T, Holz O, Magnussen H. The metabolic syndrome in patients with chronic bronchitis and COPD: frequency and associated consequences for systemic inflammation and physical inactivity. Chest. 2009;136:1039–1046. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • WHO (2008).WHO . WHO STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS) Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2008. Available at http://www.who.int/chp/steps/en/ [Google Scholar]
  • Yamamoto et al. (2014).Yamamoto Y, Oya J, Nakagami T, Uchigata Y. Association between lung function and metabolic syndrome independent of insulin in Japanese men and women. Japanese Clinical Medicine. 2014;5:1–8. doi: 10.4137/JCM.S13564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yeh et al. (2011).Yeh F, Dixon AE, Marion S, Schaefer C, Zhang Y, Best LG, Calhoun D, Rhoades ER, Lee ET. Obesity in adults is associated with reduced lung function in metabolic syndrome and diabetes: the strong heart study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2306–2313. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou et al. (2013).Zhou J, Zhang Q, Yuan X, Wang J, Li C, Sheng H, Qu S, Li H. Association between metabolic syndrome and osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Bone. 2013;57(1):30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES