Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2015 Jun 18;66(14):4227–4237. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv292

Contrasting allelic distribution of CO/Hd1 homologues in Miscanthus sinensis from the East Asian mainland and the Japanese archipelago

Hironori Nagano 1, Lindsay V Clark 2, Hua Zhao 3, Junhua Peng 4, Ji Hye Yoo 5, Kweon Heo 5, Chang Yeon Yu 5, Kossonou Guillaume Anzoua 1, Tomoaki Matsuo 1, Erik J Sacks 2, Toshihiko Yamada 1,*
PMCID: PMC4493791  PMID: 26089536

Highlight

Homologues of CONSTANS/Heading date 1 were cloned from Miscanthus sinensis and named MsiHd1. MsiHd1a in most Japanese accessions contained non-functional alleles, whereas Asian mainland accessions harboured only functional alleles.

Key words: Bioenergy, flowering time gene, gene duplication, geographical allelic differentiation, Miscanthus sinensis, MITEs.

Abstract

The genus Miscanthus is a perennial C4 grass native to eastern Asia and is a promising candidate bioenergy crop for cool temperate areas. Flowering time is a crucial factor governing regional and seasonal adaptation; in addition, it is also a key target trait for extending the vegetative phase to improve biomass potential. Homologues of CONSTANS (CO)/Heading date 1(Hd1) were cloned from Miscanthus sinensis and named MsiHd1. Sequences of MsiHd1 homologues were compared among 24 wild M. sinensis accessions from Japan, 14 from China, and three from South Korea. Two to five MsiHd1 alleles in each accession were identified, suggesting that MsiHd1 consists of at least three loci in the Miscanthus genome. Verifying the open reading frame in MsiHd1, they were classified as putative functional alleles without mutations or non-functional alleles caused by indels. The Neighbor–Joining tree indicated that one of the multiple MsiHd1 loci is a pseudogene locus without any functional alleles. The pseudogene locus was named MsiHd1b, and the other loci were considered to be part of the MsiHd1a multi-locus family. Interestingly, in most Japanese accessions 50% or more of the MsiHd1a alleles were non-functional, whereas accessions from the East Asian mainland harboured only functional alleles. Five novel miniature inverted transposable elements (MITEs) (MsiMITE1MsiMITE5) were observed in MsiHd1a/b. MsiMITE1, detected in exon 1 of MsiHd1a, was only observed in Japanese accessions and its revertant alleles derived from retransposition were predominantly in Chinese accessions. These differences in MsiHd1a show that the dependency on functional MsiHd1a alleles is different between accessions from the East Asian mainland and Japan.

Introduction

The genus Miscanthus is a rhizomatous perennial C4 grass that grows naturally in East Asia and Oceania (Hodkinson et al., 2002). Miscanthus spp. are now a leading choice for bioenergy crops in cool temperate regions. Taxonomically, Miscanthus belongs to the Andropogoneae tribe along with maize (Zea mays L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), and sugarcane (Saccharum hybrids) (Hodkinson et al., 2002). Among Miscanthus spp., Miscanthus sinensis Anderss., Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Maxim.) Franch. and Miscanthus×giganteus Greef & Deuter ex Hodkinson & Renvoize have gained attention as bioenergy crop candidates. M. sinensis is naturally distributed in East and South-East Asia and it is typically diploid (Lafferty and Lelly, 1994; Sacks et al., 2013). M. sacchariflorus is also native to East Asia, and includes diploid and tetraploid ecotypes. Most M. sacchariflorus in China are diploid, whereas M. sacchariflorus in Japan is predominantly tetraploid. To date, commercial biomass production using Miscanthus is limited to the cultivation of a single clone of M.×giganteus, a sterile interspecific hybrid between M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus that was brought from Yokohama, Japan to Denmark in the 1930s by Aksel Olsen (Greef and Deuter, 1993; Linde-Laursen, 1993).

M. sinensis has been studied as a bioenergy crop alternative to M.×giganteus because of its greater cold tolerance and yield in cold regions, ability to be propagated by seed, the availability of genetic resources, and the possibility to develop new genotypes through conventional breeding programmes (Stewart et al., 2009; Hodgson et al., 2010; Anzoua et al., 2015). M. sinensis is adapted primarily to environments that have an average annual minimum temperature of –28.9 °C or greater (USDA hardiness zone 5 or warmer) and receive ≥750mm of precipitation annually (Clifton-Brown et al., 2008; Sacks et al., 2013). M. sinensis is an early colonizer after ecological disturbance in environments that would otherwise support forest (Numata and Mitsudera, 1969; Stewart et al., 2009). Its wide geographical range suggests opportunities for isolation and differentiation of populations. However, M. sinensis is self-incompatible and has wind-dispersed pollen and seed which are traits that would be expected to limit the differentiation of populations. Early population genetic studies with molecular markers evaluated accessions of M. sinensis over some of its native range, for example, in Japan (Shimono et al., 2013), the Izu Islands of Japan (Iwata et al., 2005, 2006), Taiwan and the Ryukyu Islands (Chou et al., 2000), South Korea (Qin et al., 2013), and China (Xu et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2013), and between South Korea and Japan (Slavov et al., 2013). More recently, many accessions of M. sinensis from most of its native range in Japan, China, and South Korea were evaluated with restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-Seq) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, GoldenGate SNPs, and ten plastid microsatellite markers (Clark et al., 2014).

Flowering time is a crucial factor governing regional and seasonal adaptation; in addition, it is also a key target trait for extending the vegetative phase of Miscanthus to improve biomass potential. M. sinensis from high latitudes and high altitudes flower earlier than those from low-altitude and low-latitude regions in Japan, with the earliest M. sinensis flowering two months before the latest M. sinensis (Adati, 1958; Anzoua et al., 2015). The genetic mechanisms for the regulation of flowering time have been characterized in many plants. CONSTANS (CO) and Heading Date 1 (Hd1) are central regulators for the flowering pathway in Arabidopsis and rice, respectively (Valverde, 2011). CO and Hd1 are orthologues that have diverged from a common ancestral gene and encode a nuclear protein that contains a CCT (CONSTANS, CO-like, and TOC1) motif and two B-box-type zinc-finger domains. The CCT motif includes a nuclear import signal (Robson et al., 2001), and B-boxes are considered to be involved in protein–protein interaction rather than in DNA-binding functions (Khanna et al., 2009). CO promotes flowering only under long photoperiods, whereas Hd1 suppresses flowering under long-day conditions and promotes it under short-day conditions, showing bi-functionality to the photoperiodic response (Yano et al., 2000; Shrestha et al., 2014). In addition, in sorghum, which is closely related to Miscanthus, two floral activators, SbCO and SbEhd1 function in photoperiod-sensitive flowering (Yang et al., 2014). SbPRR37 and SbGhd7 repress the activity of SbCO and SbEhd1, respectively, and delay flowering in long-days (Murphy et al., 2011, 2014; Yang et al., 2014).

This is the first report to characterize flowering genes in the genus Miscanthus. Sequences of CO/Hd1 homologues were compared using a broad geographical sampling from Japan, South Korea, and China. In this study, it is shown that multiple homologous copies of CO/Hd1 are a common feature in Miscanthus. Furthermore, it was also shown that many non-functional alleles were detected in accessions from the Japanese archipelago, whereas non-functional alleles were not observed in most accessions from the Asian mainland. The factors involved with such a striking geographical difference are discussed.

Materials and methods

Plants

The accessions studied and their provenances are shown in Table 1. Genetic data were obtained from 44 Miscanthus genotypes, including 24 wild M. sinensis accessions collected from throughout Japan, 14 M. sinensis from throughout China, three M. sinensis from Korea, one M. sinensis ssp. condensatus from Japan, one M. floridulus from Japan, and one diploid M. sacchariflorus ‘Robustus’, and one tetraploid M. sacchariflorus from Japan. Subsets of accessions were phenotypically evaluated in two randomized complete block design field trials conducted at the Experiment Farm of the Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University (43°04’ N, 141°20’ E), in Sapporo, Japan. The first field trial had two replications and the second field trial had four replications. Seeds of Miscanthus were sown in March of 2007 in a greenhouse and seedlings of 14 Japanese M. sinensis accessions were transplanted in the field in June to establish the first field trial (Table 1). A second field trial was established at Hokkaido University from clonal divisions in June 2012 with nine of the Japanese accessions in the first field trial plus two additional Japanese accessions, one from Korea, and seven from China (Table 1). Accessions not included in the field trial were grown in a greenhouse.

Table 1.

Plant materials and their characteristics

Map no. Acc. no. Alleles identified in Hd1 homologues and putative loci No. of sequenced plasmid clones Species of genus Miscanthus Prefectures (cities) Country Latitude Longitude First appearance of heading in Sapporo
Hd1a Hd1b 2012 2014
1 JM0015-5 F F M1 17 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Fukagawa) Japan 43.69 142.08 22 Jul
2 JM0080-4 F M1 10 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Bihoro) Japan 43.66 144.25 22 Jul
3 JM0079-2 F F M1 N 12 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Iouzan) Japan 43.62 144.45 26 Jul 28 Jul
4 JM0079-5 F F M1 N M2 13 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Iouzan) Japan 43.62 144.45
5 JM0047-5 F F M1 15 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Shakotan) Japan 43.30 140.55 14 Aug 18 Aug
6 JM0058-1 F R M2/4 10 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Toyoura) Japan 42.60 140.65 21 Aug 27 Aug
7 JM0058-2 F F N N 9 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Toyoura) Japan 42.60 140.65 3 Sep
8 JM0071-1 F F N 8 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Kaminokuni) Japan 41.79 140.08 8 Aug
9 JM0071-5 F M1 10 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Kaminokuni) Japan 41.79 140.08 21 Aug
10 JM0069-4 F F F M2 16 M. sinensis Hokkaido (Matsumae) Japan 41.40 140.22 14 Aug
11 JM0085-5 F F M1 N 11 M. sinensis Iwate (Morioka) Japan 39.75 141.14 21 Aug 25 Aug
12 JM0190-5 F F M1 M1 N 16 M. sinensis Fukushima (Fukushima) Japan 37.53 140.11
13 JM0091-2 F F M1 M1 N 21 M. sinensis Tochigi (Nasu) Japan 36.92 139.92 21 Sep 3 Sep
14 JM0382-5 F M1 M1 15 M. sinensis Gunma (Gunma) Japan 36.81 139.31
15 JM0094-2 F M1 10 M. sinensis Nagano (Matsubarako) Japan 36.05 138.46 21 Aug 8 Sep
16 JM0098-5 F F M1 M1 15 M. sinensis Yamanashi (Akeno) Japan 35.78 138.48 8 Sep
17 JM0273-5 F N M2 12 M. sinensis Shimane (Shimane) Japan 34.87 132.06
18 JM0118-1 F N M2 12 M. sinensis Tokushima (Shiozuka) Japan 33.94 133.68 27 Sep 26 Sep
19 JM0119-5 R N M2 8 M. sinensis Kochi (Kochi) Japan 33.56 133.38 27 Sep 27 Sep
20 JM0125-1 F N N M2/3 16 M. sinensis Miyazaki (Miyakonojo) Japan 31.53 131.24 17 Oct non
21 JM0137-4 F M1 15 M. sinensis Kagoshima (Tanegashima) Japan 30.44 131.03
22 Uruma1b F N 8 M. sinensis Okinawa (Uruma) Japan 26.34 127.85
23 Onna1a F N M2 14 M. sinensis Okinawa (Onna) Japan 26.45 127.81
24 PMS-436 R R F F 13 M. sinensis Liaoning (Benxi) China 41.32 123.74 27 Aug
25 KMS-149 R R F 11 M. sinensis Kangwon (Inje) Korea 38.22 128.37
26 PMS-164 R R F M2 12 M. sinensis Hebei (Xingtai) China 37.34 114.28 17 Sep
27 KMS-239 R F M2 14 M. sinensis Gyeongsangbuk (Bonghwa) Korea 36.91 128.84 15 Sep
28 PMS-161 R R F M2 14 M. sinensis Shanxi (Qinshui) China 35.72 112.32
29 KMS-092 R F M2 9 M. sinensis Jeollanam (Haenam) Korea 34.63 126.63
30 PMS-144 R F 8 M. sinensis Shanxi (Baoji) China 34.24 106.93 5 Sep
31 PMS-134 R F F 13 M. sinensis Gansu (Longnan) China 33.76 105.80 27 Aug
32 PMS-088 R F F 7 M. sinensis Hubei (Shenlongjia) China 31.49 110.37
33 PMS-007 R M5 M5 M2 14 M. sinensis Hubei (Badong) China 30.80 110.26 13 Sep
34 PMS-303 F F F M2 M2 12 M. sinensis Zhejiang (Fuyang) China 30.10 119.94 –- -
35 PMS-425 R F F M2 12 M. sinensis Hubei (Chibi) China 29.72 113.85 31 Oct
36 PMS-285 R M2 11 M. sinensis Anhui (Huangshan) China 29.64 118.16 2 Oct
37 PMS-227 F F F 13 M. sinensis Guizhou (Guiyang) China 26.61 106.75
38 PMS-397 R F F F 8 M. sinensis Guangxi (Liuzhou) China 24.40 109.98
39 PMS-351 F F 8 M. sinensis Guangdong (Wuhua) China 24.07 115.63
40 PMS-381 F F 11 M. sinensis Hainan (Wuzhishan) China 19.01 109.65
41 Mfl15-2 R F F N N N 23 M. floridulus Shimane (Masuda) Japan 34.74 131.87
42 JM0208-5 F F N N N 25 M. sinensis ssp. condensatus Tokyo (Hachijoujima) Japan
43 Msa(2x) F F N 14 M. sacchariflorus 'Robustus' Japan
44 Msa(4x) F F F F F N N N 24 M. sacchariflorus Miyazaki (Miyakonojo) Japan

: Functional alleles : Non-functional alleles. F, functional alleles; R, revertant alleles; N, non-functional alleles; M1 to M5, insertion alleles of MsiMITE1 to MsiMITE5

M2/M3 or M2/M4 represents having both of MsiMITE2/MITE3 or MsiMITE2/MITE4. Map no. 1 to 40 corresponds to the number on the map in Fig. 4.

Heading date

The date of first heading in the field trials was recorded weekly during the growing season; heading date was recorded and analysed instead of flowering time because the former was more consistent than the latter in our short-season location (data not shown). Heading was defined as the flower stalk emerging from the leaf sheath by ≥1cm. The 2012 heading date data was from the first field trial established in 2007, and the 2014 data was from the second trial established in 2012 (Table 1).

DNA and RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Genomic DNA of 28 Miscanthus accessions (nos. 1–21, 25, 27, 29, and 41–44 in Table 1) was extracted from 200mg of adult leaves using the DNeasy plant DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The remaining genomic DNA of 16 accessions was provided by the University of Illinois. Total RNA (JM0079-2 and JM0125-1) was prepared from 200mg of adult leaves using the TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). One microgram of total RNA was used to synthesize oligo dT primed cDNA at 50 °C for 30min using the TaKaRa AMV kit (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan). This cDNA was amplified by PCR with a forward primer (5’-GATCAGGAGAAGACATATACACCC-3’) for determining the sites of splicing and terminal end in the transcript.

DNA amplification and sequencing

Primers used in gene cloning were designed based on CO/Hd1 homologues in sorghum, the closest relative of Miscanthus with an annotated genome. Version 1.4 of the Sorghum bicolor genome was queried using a BLAST search at Phytozome (http://www.phytozome.net/) and the nucleotide region detected with about 2kb on chromosome 10 was used for primer design. For 5’ and 3’ untranslated regions, the TaKaRa LA PCR in vitro Cloning Kit (TaKaRa) was used to obtain DNA fragments. Finally, DNA fragments (2–2.5kb) containing the 5’ flanking region to 3’ flanking region were amplified using specific primers (F14: 5’- GATCAGGAGAAGACATATACACCC-3’ and R17: 5’- GATCACTGACCACTCATGGTATAAC-3’) and Taq polymerase (TaKaRa). PCR conditions were as follows: 30 s at 96 °C, 30 s at 50 °C, and 3min at 72 °C (30 cycles). The buffer and Mg2+ concentration were prepared according to the user’s manual. PCR products containing the coding region were cloned into a pGEM vector (Promega KK., Tokyo, Japan). In total, seven to 25 plasmid clones of each accession were sequenced (Table 1). The nucleotide sequence was determined in both directions using an ABI 3130 genetic analyser (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) with a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v3.1 and then aligned with ATGC software (GENETYX Co., Tokyo, Japan). The DNA sequences obtained are available from DDBJ (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/index-e.html) with the accession numbers AB973600 to AB973675 and LC010137 to LC010211.

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic trees were constructed using GENETYX software, version 10.1.4 (GENETYX Co, Tokyo, Japan). The Neighbor–Joining (NJ) method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) was conducted with Kimura’s (1980) two-parameter distances, ignoring indels. The corresponding sequences of sorghum were used as an out-group.

Results

Heading date

For the subset of Japanese accessions that were evaluated for heading date in both years, the correlation between years was r=0.889 indicating that heading date is quite stable from year to year. A significant correlation (r= –0.853) was observed between latitude and heading date (Fig. 1). As expected from previous studies, there was a latitudinal gradient of heading date for both the accessions from mainland Asia and for those from Japan, with northern accessions heading earlier in the growing season than southern ones when grown in a common garden in Sapporo (Table 1). There was no latitudinal difference in flowering time between Asian mainland and Japanese accessions (Table 1; Fig. 1).

Isolation of MsiHd1 homologues

To isolate CO/Hd1 homologues of M. sinensis, PCR amplification was carried out for 23 accessions derived from the Japanese archipelago, three accessions from South Korea, and 14 from China. Specific 2–2.5kb PCR products were amplified from all accessions. Based on the results of RT-PCR, the M. sinensis CO/Hd1 sequence consisting of two exons and one intron in the PCR fragment was identified and named as MsiHd1 (Fig. 2). The MsiHd1 encoded approximately 400 amino acids with two conserved B-box zinc finger domains, which may be responsible for protein–protein interactions (Ben-Naim et al., 2006; Wenkel et al., 2006), and a CCT domain, which is involved with nuclear localization signal (Robson et al., 2001) (see Supplementary Fig. S1 at JXB online). Both domains are features of CO/Hd1. Splicing sites of MsiHd1 matched to those of sorghum and rice. PolyA addition sites were 159bp downstream of the stop codon (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The gene structure of Miscanthus CO/Hd1 homologues, MsiHd1. Two types of homologues, MsiHd1a and MsiHd1b, were detected. MsiHd1b is a putative pseudogene, given that its sequences are discriminated unambiguously from MsiHd1a by a common MsiMITE2 insertion and additional indels with deleterious mutations, including one crucial, 1bp insertion that causes a premature stop codon. The positions of the start and stop codon and polyA addition site are shown. Insertional sites of five miniature inverted transposable elements (MITEs) (MsiMITE1–5) are indicated by filled triangles. Miscanthus accessions in which MITE sequences were detected are indicated in parentheses below the names of the MITEs. All PCR products from the genus Miscanthus in this study were amplified by a pair of primers, F14 and R17, depicted as arrowheads above the figure.

Identification of alleles and analysis of gene phylogenetic tree

Two to five different alleles of MsiHd1 were found in each accession, indicating that MsiHd1 consists of at least three loci in the Miscanthus genome (Table 1). Based on nucleotide sequences, alleles could be assigned to two broad groups: putative functional alleles with an open reading frame and putative loss-of-function alleles caused by the same deleterious, 1bp insertion that resulted in a premature stop codon in exon 1 (Figs 2, 3).

An NJ tree indicated that at least one of the multiple MsiHd1 loci was a pseudogene locus with deleterious mutations, forming a distinctive monophyletic clade (Fig. 3; see Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online). The pseudogene locus was named as MsiHd1b and the others were considered alleles of the MsiHd1a multi-locus family. All 46 alleles of MsiHd1a detected in accessions from China and South Korea appeared to be functional based on their sequence, whereas about half of the alleles of MsiHd1a from Japanese accessions had putative loss-of-function mutations (35 functional alleles/68 total alleles=51.5%). Thus, a strikingly large difference was observed in the number of putative functional alleles between accessions from the Asian mainland and the Japanese archipelago (Fig. 4), although no clear difference for Hd1a alleles was observed among northern, middle, and southern latitudinal regions.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Neighbor–Joining (NJ) tree showing the relationships among 54 CO/Hd1 alleles of 16 accessions of Miscanthus sinensis, six CO/Hd1 alleles from one of M. floridulus, five CO/Hd1 alleles from one of M. sinensis spp. condensatus, three CO/Hd1 alleles from one of M. sacchariflorus (2×), and eight CO/Hd1 alleles from one of M. sacchariflorus (4x). To facilitate viewing this figure on a single page, only about half of the accessions analysed are shown here (see Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online for the complete tree). Sixteen accessions of M. sinensis that represent a range of MITE insertions and latitudes of origin were included in this figure. Sorghum bicolor was used as an out-group. The phylogenetic tree was split largely into two clades, which were classified as two loci, Hd1a and Hd1b. All detected alleles of Hd1b in M. sinensis were non-functional. Major mutations that caused loss-of-function are shown to the right of the red circles, which represent non-functional alleles. The double slash on the out-group branch indicates shortening of the branch length by approximately half. Bootstrap values for nodes supported in >50% of 1000 bootstrap replicates are shown. The unnumbered squares, circles, and triangles represent the geographic origin of accessions, putative gene function, and the existence of MsiMITE1, respectively. The numbered triangles show MsiMITE2 to MsiMITE5.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Geographic distribution of Hd1a alleles in M. sinensis accessions from East Asia. Information regarding MsiHd1b was omitted for simplification. The site numbers on the map correspond to map numbers in Table 1. Pie charts with one to five pieces represent the number of detected alleles in MsiHd1a. Blue indicates functional alleles and red indicates non-functional alleles. R, revertant allele from MsiMITE1; M1, MsiMITE1; and M5, MsiMITE5.

Identification of MITE transposon and revertant alleles

Five novel types of miniature inverted transposable elements (MITEs) with distinctive terminal structures (TIRs: terminal inverted repeats, TSDs: target site duplications) were identified in MsiHd1 alleles and named as MsiMITE1MsiMITE5 (Fig. 5; see Supplementary Fig. S3 at JXB online). MsiMITE1 and MsiMITE5 were found in MsiHd1a, whereas the other three MITEs were found in MsiHd1b (Table 1; Figs 2, 3). MITEs are known to be preferentially located in the vicinity of genes (Bureau and Wessler, 1994; Feschotte et al., 2002). During the alignment work, if a relatively large insertion gap (<500bp) was found and both ends of the gap had TIRs and TSDs, the insertion sequence was identified as a MITE. MsiMITE1, which was only detected in Japanese accessions, was found to cause loss-of-function of MsiHd1a at the insertion site by forming a stop codon. On the other hand, many accessions from the Asian mainland had revertant alleles derived from retransposition, leaving a footprint of 6bp instead of a full MsiMITE1 sequence (Fig. 5). Revertant alleles were found in most accessions from the Asian mainland but in only one Japanese accession (JM0119-5; although another Japanese accession, JM0058-1, also had a footprint of 6bp, that allele was considered not to be a revertant allele because it had an additional putative loss-of-function mutation; Table 1). Two MITE subfamilies (MsiMITE2 and MsiMITE3) were observed in tandem in the 5’ untranslated region of the MsiHd1b locus (Fig. 2). MsiMITE3, MsiMITE4, and MsiMITE5 were only detected in JM0125-1, JM0058-1, and PMS007, respectively. These three MITEs were also detected in other Poaceae species (see Supplementary Fig. S4 at JXB online), but MsiMITE1 and MsiMITE2 were not (see Supplementary Fig. S3 at JXB online).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The structure of MsiMITE1 and a schematic diagram of its insertion and retransposition. (A) A target site before insertion of MsiMITE1. (B) Miniature inverted transposable element (MITE)-like sequences are recognized by terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) and target site duplications (TSDs). (C) Revertant alleles contain a 6bp footprint which encodes two additional amino acids (proline and aspartic acid) at the insertion-retransposition site of MsiMITE1.

Variation in the number of copies of MsiHd1 among Miscanthus species

Specific PCR products of CO/Hd1 homologues were also obtained from other Miscanthus species including M. sinensis ssp. condensatus, M. floridulus, M. sacchariflorus (2x), and M. sacchariflorus (4x) and their nucleotide sequences were determined. In total, 76 unique sequences (alleles) were obtained from Miscanthus genomes (Table 1; Fig. 3). Similar to MsiHd1a and MsiHd1b in M. sinensis, MflHd1a/b in M. floridulus, McoHd1a/b in M. sinensis ssp. condensatus, Msa (2x) Hd1a/b in M. sacchariflorus (2x), Msa (4x) Hd1a/b in M. sacchariflorus (4x) were identified and named, respectively. A functional allele at Hd1b was detected only in M. sacchariflorus (2x). In Hd1b of both M. sinensis ssp. condensatus (McoHd1b) and M. sacchariflorus (4x) (Msa(4x)Hd1b), three non-functional alleles were detected, consisting of at least two loci in which pseudogenization occurred. Five alleles of Msa(4x)Hd1a were detected from M. sacchariflorus (4x). M. floridulus had a revertant allele with a 6bp footprint, however, MsiMITE1-like sequences could not be detected from the M. floridulus genome.

Discussion

Unexpectedly, among M. sinensis accessions from a broad latitudinal distribution, no correlation between days to heading and the polymorphisms of MsiHd1 was observed. However, a clear difference in the distribution of the putative functional genes in MsiHd1a was observed between accessions from the Asian mainland and those from the Japanese archipelago (Fig. 4; Table 1). This difference shows that dependency on the gene function of MsiHd1a is different between the two areas. In Miscanthus, the presence or absence of other flowering-time genes epistatic to Hd1 might have promoted the geographic allelic differentiation of MsiHd1a between populations from the Asian mainland and the Japanese archipelago. Similar patterns of differentiation of flowering-time genes have been observed in other plant species. For example, FRIGIDA (FRI) in Arabidopsis enhances the effect of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), which is downstream of FRI in the floral pathway, and thus only accessions with functional alleles of FRI are subjected to the influence of FLC alleles for the number of days to flowering (Caicedo et al., 2004). In addition, in a field experiment with Arabidopsis, a correlation between the number of days to flowering and the latitude of origin was observed only among accessions with functional FRI alleles, and accessions from lower latitudes flowered earlier (Stinchcombe et al., 2004). Since no correlation was observed among accessions with non-functional FRI, it seems that geographic differentiation of FLC alleles in Arabidopsis depends on the epistasis (gene interaction) of FLC and FRI. In rice, much research on the epistasis of Hd1 to other flowering-time genes has been reported (Lin et al., 2000; Uwatoko et al., 2008; Takahashi et al., 2009; Ito and Izawa, 2013; Chen et al., 2014). Rice Hd6, which encodes a protein kinase CK2α, suppresses flowering only in the presence of functional Hd1 (Takahashi et al., 2001; Ogiso et al., 2010). In a population structure study using neutral genetic markers, Slavov et al. (2013) identified two subpopulations of M. sinensis, with one from mainland Asia around the Korean peninsula and the other from Japan, but they also observed a similar latitudinal cline for flowering time in both subpopulations; their results are consistent with our findings. It is expected that analyses of individual genes could best explain local adaptation and the evolutionary history of M. sinensis. Studies on other flowering-time genes of Miscanthus would further elucidate the population differentiation observed in MsiHd1a alleles in the present study.

The NJ tree showed that 20 of the 44 Miscanthus accessions that were analysed had two diverged loci, Hd1a and Hd1b (Fig. 3; see Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online). Although their positions on the Miscanthus genome are unknown, the existence of duplicated Hd1 loci can be considered to be universal within the genus Miscanthus, in contrast to sorghum, maize, and rice which have only one Hd1 locus. The recent genome duplication of Miscanthus relative to sorghum (Kim et al., 2012; Ma et al., 2012; Swaminathan et al., 2012) can at least partially account for differences in the number of Hd1 loci. Large-scale genomic analyses of M. sinensis have revealed that M. sinensis (x=19) is a diploidized tetraploid species formed by the duplication of chromosomes after the divergence from an x=10 ancestor (Kim et al., 2012; Ma et al., 2012; Swaminathan et al., 2012). The three or more loci of MsiHd1 identified by this study in M. sinensis might have been caused in part by the whole genome duplication (MsiHd1a and MsiHd1b) and also by local gene duplications (multiple MsiHd1a) via unequal crossing-over (Fig. 6). Although gene duplication can be an evolutionary process to gain new function (Ohno, 1970), a duplicated gene can alternatively be subjected to inactivation by mutations and genetic drift (Hughes, 1994; Force et al., 1999). Redundancy of gene functions among multiple MsiHd1 loci through polyploidization might have allowed pseudogenization of MsiHd1b. The precise number of MsiHd1a loci in Miscanthus remains unknown. In two Japanese accessions, JM0190-5 and JM0091-2, five copies of MsiHd1a were detected, suggesting the possibility of additional duplications in MsiHd1a. The M. floridulus Hd1 locus, having a revertant allele, showed the greatest sequence similarity to the M. sinensis Hd1 locus (Fig. 3) of the species evaluated. McoHd1b and Msa(4x)Hd1b in M. sinensis spp. condensatus and M. sacchariflorus (4x), respectively, each had three alleles, suggesting at least two loci, in contrast to the putative single locus in M. sinensis. The observation of five alleles of Msa(4x)Hd1a within one individual M. sacchariflorus (4x) indicates that there are at least three Msa(4x)Hd1a loci in this individual. As observed above, copy number of Hd1a/b varies among species in the genus Miscanthus.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Schematic model for Miscanthus Hd1 evolution. Blue indicates functional alleles and red indicates non-functional alleles. The whole genome duplication of Miscanthus resulted in Hd1a and Hd1b loci. Accumulation of deleterious mutations caused pseudogenization of Hd1b in M. sinensis. By additional local duplication, Hd1a increased in copy number (duplicated genes designated as Hd1a’ and Hd1a’’ in figure). After the last glacial maximum, the number of functional Hd1a alleles in the Asian mainland population of M. sinensis was high, whereas, in the Japanese population, the number of functional alleles decreased due to the accumulation of alleles with MITE insertions and/or other deleterious mutations. This difference suggests that dependency on the gene function of Hd1a is different between M. sinensis populations from the Asian mainland and the Japanese archipelago.

Differentiation of M. sinensis between mainland Asian populations and Japanese populations for number of functional Hd1 alleles is consistent with Clark et al.’s (2014) finding that migration after the last glacial maximum from a refugium in south-eastern China to Japan occurred prior to migrations northward in mainland Asia. Moreover, Clark et al. (2014) estimated that the nascent Japanese M. sinensis population survived the Younger Dryas as a distinct group, which probably included strong natural selection for adaptation to a short growing season, whereas M. sinensis in mainland Asia remained in longer-season lower latitude environments until more recently. However, the phylogenetic tree of MsiHd1 in the present study identified no distinct clear clade that separates Japan from the Asian mainland (Fig. 3). Thus, our hypothesis is that the polymorphism seen within MsiHd1 existed in the ancestral population of M. sinensis, as opposed to being a recent set of mutations originating from distinct geographic regions, which is consistent with the data of Clark et al. (2014) that suggested a recent (14 000 years before present and later) but differential expansion of the range of M. sinensis throughout East Asia that allowed for a different history of selection pressure on mainland and Japanese populations. Although M. sinensis populations from mainland Asia and Japan currently differ in the number of functional MsiHd1 alleles, genotypes of both populations collected from similar latitudes head at similar times when grown in a common garden, suggesting that they may have differing genetic mechanisms to arrive at the same phenotypic result. This insight leads to the hypothesis that crosses between mainland M. sinensis genotypes and Japanese M. sinensis genotypes are more likely to exhibit transgressive segregation for heading date than crosses within either geographic group, assuming similar latitudes of origin of the parents for the comparisons.

In this study, in addition to the five novel MITE-like transposable elements (MsiMITE1–5) that were identified in the CO/Hd1 homologues of M. sinensis, a putative revertant allele with evidence of retransposition of MsiMITE1 was also found (Figs 3, 5; Table 1). It is possible to identify MITEs if their basic features, including TIRs and TSDs, are determined using sequence alignments (Nagano et al., 2002). Of the five detected MsiMITEs, three were found to have homologues with similar sequences in the genomes of sugarcane, sorghum, and switchgrass (see Supplementary Fig. S4 at JXB online). The TIRs and TSDs were also observed in the genomes of these other plant species, suggesting that at least these elements are shared among other plant species. Since the early 1990s, when MITEs were reported in the vicinity of the waxy gene of rice and maize, respectively (Umeda et al., 1991; Bureau and Wessler, 1992), many more MITE families were identified in plants and animals including humans (Feschotte et al., 2002). MITEs are currently ordered and classified into six superfamilies (Tc1/mariner, PIF/Harbinger, hAT, Mutator, CACTA, and/or Micron; Lu et al., 2012; Han et al., 2013). In these definitions, MsiMITE1, MsiMITE3, and MsiMITE5 belong to the hAT superfamily (8bp of TSD, >5bp of TIR), and MsiMITE2 and MsiMITE4 belong to the PIF/Harbinger superfamily (3bp of TSD, >4bp of TIR) (see Supplementary Fig. S3 at JXB online). MsiMITE1 and MsiMITE2, which are specifically identified within MsiHd1a or in the 5’ UTR of MsiHd1b, respectively, do not have similar sequences in any genome database. However, our Southern blot analysis using a probe spanning the full length of MsiMITE1 (ca. 500bp) detected multiple discrete signals in the M. sinensis genome (see Supplementary Fig. S5 at JXB online). This result suggests that many unidentified MsiMITE1 sequences exist in M. sinensis. It remains unclear whether the richness of MITEs observed in the region of MsiHd1a/b is typical of most genes in M. sinensis. The future accumulation of genome information for M. sinensis will help to address these questions.

In conclusion, the comparison of MsiHd1 homologous sequences among accessions derived from East Asia revealed contrasting allelic distribution in M. sinensis from the Asian mainland and Japanese archipelago. Further studies on other flowering-time genes will be necessary to elucidate the genetic architecture of flowering time and its evolution in Miscanthus and to improve biomass potential by regulation of the reproductive phase.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data can be found at JXB online.

Supplementary Fig. S1. Alignment of the CO/Hd1 homologues from Miscanthus sinensis (a functional allele from JM0079-2), Sorghum bicolor and Oryza sativa.

Supplementary Fig. S2. Complete phylogenetic tree constructed using the Neighbor–Joining (NJ) method.

Supplementary Fig. S3. The structure of MsiMITE2–5.

Supplementary Fig. S4. Comparison of three miniature inverted transposable elements (MITEs) found in the genomes of M. sinensis, sugarcane, sorghum and switchgrass.

Supplementary Fig. S5. Comparison of Southern blotting patterns between MsiHd1 (left panel) and MsiMITE1 (right panel).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Correlation between average heading date at Sapporo in 2012 and 2014 and latitude of origin for Miscanthus sinensis accessions collected from the wild in Japan (open circle), South Korea (star) and China (open square).

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Xiaoyu Li and Mr Norihiko Uchino for assistance with the DNA sequences. This work was supported by the Office of Science–Biological and Environmental Research, US Department of Energy [Project ID 0017582]. Lindsay Clark is grateful for support by a travel award from the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) and the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), DE-FOA-0000995.

References

  1. Adati S. 1958. Studies on genus Miscanthus with special reference to the Japanese species for breeding purpose as fodder crops. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agronomy , Mie University 17, 1–112. (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Anzoua GK, Suzuki K, Fujita S, Toma Y, Yamada T. 2015. Evaluation of morphological traits, winter survival, and biomass potential in wild Japanese Miscanthus sinensis Anderss. populations in northern Japan. Grassland Science 61, 83–91. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben-Naim O, Eshed R, Parnis A, Teper-Bamnolker P, Shalit A, Coupland G, Samach A, Lifschitz E. 2006. The CCAAT binding factor can mediate interactions between CONSTANS-like proteins and DNA. The Plant Journal 46, 462–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bureau TE, Wessler SR. 1992. Tourist: a large family of small inverted-repeat elements frequently associated with maize genes. The Plant Cell 4, 1283–1294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bureau TE, Wessler SR. 1994. Stowaway: a new family of inverted-repeat elements associated with genes of both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. The Plant Cell 6, 907–916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caicedo AL, Stinchcombe JR, Olsen KM, Schmitt J, Purugganan MD. 2004. Epistatic interaction between Arabidopsis FRI and FLC flowering time genes generates a latitudinal cline in a life history trait. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 15670–15675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen J, Li X, Cheng C, Wang Y, Qin M, Zhu H, Zeng R, Fu X, Liu Z, Zhang G. 2014. Characterization of epistatic interaction of QTLs LH8 and EH3 controlling heading date in rice. Scientific Reports 4, 4263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chou CH, Chiang YC, Chiang TY. 2000. Genetic variability and phytogeography of Miscanthus sinensis var. condensatus, an apomictic grass, based on RAPD fingerprints. Canadian Journal of Botany 78, 1262–1268. [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark LV, Brummer JE, Glowacka K, et al. 2014. A footprint of past climate change on the population structure of Miscanthus sinensis. Annals of Botany 114, 97–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clifton-Brown JC, Chiang YC, Hodkinson TR. 2008. Miscanthus: genetic resources and breeding potential to enhance bioenergy production. In: Vermerris W, ed. Genetic improvement of bioenergy crops. New York, Springer Science, 273–294. [Google Scholar]
  11. Feschotte C, Zhang X, Wessler SR. 2002. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and their relationship with established DNA transposons. In: Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A, eds. Mobile DNA II. Washington DC, American Society of Microbiology Press, 1147–1158. [Google Scholar]
  12. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan Y-L, Postlethwait J. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531–1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Greef JM, Deuter M. 1993. Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus ×giganteus Greef et Deu. Angewandte Botanik 67, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
  14. Han Y, Qin S, Wessler SR. 2013. Comparison of class 2 transposable elements at superfamily resolution reveals conserved and distinct features in cereal grass genomes. BMC Genomics 14, 71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hodgson EM, Lister S., J, Bridgwater AV, Clifton-Brown J, Donnison IS. 2010. Genotypic and environmentally derived variation in the cell wall composition of Miscanthus in relation to its use as a biomass feedstock. Biomass and Bioenergy 34, 652–660. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hodkinson TR, Chase MW, Renvoize SA. 2002. Characterization of a genetic resource collection for Miscanthus (Saccharinae, Andropogoneae, Poaceae) using AFLP and ISSR PCR. Annals of Botany 89, 627–636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hughes AL. 1994. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 256, 119–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Itoh H, Izawa T. 2013. The coincidence of critical day length recognition for florigen gene expression and floral transition under long-day conditions in rice. Molecular Plant 6, 635–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Iwata H, Kamijo T, Tsumura Y. 2005. Genetic structure of Miscanthus sinensis ssp. condensatus (Poaceae) on Miyake Island: implications for revegetation of volcanically devastated sites. Ecological Research 20, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  20. Iwata H, Kamijo T, Tsumura Y. 2006. Assessment of genetic diversity of native species in Izu Islands for a discriminate choice of source populations: implications for revegetation of volcanically devastated sites. Conservation Genetics 7, 399–413. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim C, Zhang D, Auckland SA, Rainville LK, Jakob K, Kronmiller B, Sacks EJ, Deuter M, Paterson AH. 2012. SSR-based genetic maps of Miscanthus sinensis and M. sacchariflorus, and their comparison to sorghum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124, 1325–1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kimura M, 1980. Simple methiod for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16, 111–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Khanna R, Kronmiller B, Maszle DR, Coupland G, Holm M, Mizuno T, Wu S-H. 2009. The Arabidopsis B-box zinc finger family. The Plant Cell 21, 3416–3420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lafferty J, Lelly T. 1994. Cytogenetic studies of different Miscanthus species with potential for agricultural use. Plant Breeding 113, 246–249. [Google Scholar]
  25. Linde-Laursen IB. 1993. Cytogenetic analysis of Miscanthus ‘Giganteus’, an interspecific hybrid. Hereditas 119, 297–300. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin HX, Yamamoto T, Sasaki T, Yano M. 2000. Characterization and detection of epistatic interactions of 3 QTLs, Hd1, Hd2, and Hd3, controlling heading date in rice using nearly isogenic lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lu C, Chen J, Zhang Y, Hu Q, Su W, Kuang H. 2012. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) have been accumulated through amplification bursts and play important roles in gene expression and species diversity in Oryza sativa . Molecular Biology and Evolution 29, 1005–1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ma XF, Jensen E, Alexandrov N, et al. 2012. High resolution genetic mapping by genome sequencing reveals genome duplication and tetraploid genetic structure of the diploid Miscanthus sinensis . PLoS ONE 7, 33821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Murphy RL, Morishige DT, Brady JA, Rooney WL, Yang S, Klein PE, Mullet JE. 2014. Ghd7 (Ma6) represses sorghum flowering in long days: Ghd7alleles enhance biomass accumulation and grain production. The Plant Genome 7, doi:10.3835/plantgenome2013.11.0040. [Google Scholar]
  30. Murphy R, Klein RR, Morishige DT, Brady JA, Rooney WL, Miller FR, Dugas DV, Klein PE, Mullet JE. 2011. Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108, 16469–16474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nagano H, Kunii M, Azuma T, Kishima Y, Sano Y. 2002. Characterization of the repetitive sequences in a 200-kb region around the rice waxy locus: diversity of transposable elements and presence of veiled repetitive sequences. Genes & Genetic Systems 77, 69–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Numata M, Mitsudera M. 1969. Efficient environmental factors to the growth and production of the Miscanthus sinensis grasslands in Japan: ecological judgement of grassland condition and trend.V. Japanese Journal of Botany 20, 135–151. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ogiso E, Takahashi Y, Sasaki T, Yano M, Izawa T. 2010. The role of casein kinase II in flowering time regulation has diversified during evolution. Plant Physiology 152, 808–820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ohno S, 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  35. Qin Y, Kabir MA, Wang HW, et al. 2013. Assessment of genetic diversity and relationships based on RAPD and AFLP analyses in Miscanthus genera landraces. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 93, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  36. Robson F, Costa MM, Hepworth SR, Vizir I, Piñeiro M, Reeves PH, Putterill J, Coupland G. 2001. Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering-time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. The Plant Journal 28, 619–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sacks EJ, Juvik JA, Lin Q, Stewart JR, Yamada T. 2013. The gene pool of Miscanthus species and its improvement. In: Paterson AH, ed. Genomics of the Saccharinae. New York: Springer, 73–101. [Google Scholar]
  38. Saito N, Nei M. 1987. The Neighbor–Joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4, 406–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shimono Y, Kurokawa S, Nishida T, Ikeda H, Futagami N. 2013. Phylogeography based on intraspecific sequence variation in chloroplast DNA of Miscanthus sinensis (Poaceae), a native pioneer grass in Japan. Botany 91, 449–456. [Google Scholar]
  40. Slavov G, Robson P, Jensen E, et al. 2013. Contrasting geographic patterns of genetic variation for molecular markers vs. phenotypic traits in the energygrass Miscanthus sinensis . Global Change Biology Bioenergy 5, 562–571. [Google Scholar]
  41. Shrestha R, Gómez-Ariza J, Brambilla V, Fornara F. 2014. Molecular control of seasonal flowering in rice, arabidopsis, and temperate cereals. Annals of Botany 114, 1445–1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stewart JR, Toma Y, Fernandez FG, Nishiwaki A, Yamada T, Bollero G. 2009. The ecology and agronomy of Miscanthus sinensis, a species important to bioenergy crop development, in its native range in Japan: a review. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 1, 126–153. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stinchcombe JR, Weinig C, Ungerer M, Olsen KM, Mays C, Halldorsdottir SS, Purugganan MD, Schmitt J. 2004. A latitudinal cline in flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana modulated by the flowering time gene FRIGIDA . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 4712–4717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Swaminathan K, Chae WB, Mitros T, et al. 2012. A framework genetic map for Miscanthus sinensis from RNAseq-based markers shows recent tetraploidy. BMC Genomics 13, 142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Takahashi Y, Shomura A, Sasaki T, Yano M. 2001. Hd6, a rice quantitative trait locus involved in photoperiod sensitivity, encodes the alpha subunit of protein kinase CK2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 7922–7927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Takahashi Y, Teshima K, Yokoi S, Innan H, Shimamoto K. 2009. Variations in Hd1 proteins, Hd3a promoters, and Ehd1 expression levels contribute to diversity of flowering time in cultivated rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106, 4555– 4560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Umeda M, Ohtsubo H, Ohtsubo E. 1991. Diversification of the rice Waxy gene by insertion of mobile DNA elements into introns. Japanese Journal of Genetics 66, 569–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Uwatoko N, Onishi A, Ikeda Y, Kontani M, Sasaki A, Matsubara K, Itoh Y, Sano Y. 2008. Epistasis among the three major flowering time genes in rice: coordinate changes of photoperiod sensitivity, basic vegetative growth and optimum photoperiod. Euphytica 163, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  49. Valverde F. 2011. CONSTANS and the evolutionary origin of photoperiodic timing of flowering. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 2453–2463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wenkel S, Turck F, Singer K, Gissot L, Le Gourrierec J, Samach A, Coupland G. 2006. CONSTANS and the CCAAT box binding complex share a functionally important domain and interact to regulate flowering of Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 18, 2971–2984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu WZ, Zhang XQ, Huang LK, Nie G, Wang JP. 2013. Higher genetic diversity and gene flow in wild populations of Miscanthus sinensis in southwest China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 48, 174–181. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang S, Weers BD, Morishige DT, Mullet JE. 2014. CONSTANS is a photoperiod regulated activator of flowering in sorghum. BMC Plant Biology 14, 148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, et al. 2000. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS . The Plant Cell 12, 2473–2484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang QX, Shen YK, Shao RX, Fang J, He YQ, Ren JX, Zheng BS, Chen GJ. 2013. Genetic diversity of natural Miscanthus sinensis populations in China revealed by ISSR markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 48, 248–256. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhao H, Wang B, He JR, Yang JP, Pan L, Sun DF, Peng JH. 2013. Genetic diversity and population structure of Miscanthus sinensis germplasm in China. PLoS ONE 8, e75672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES