Abstract
Simple Summary
Transport to the slaughterhouse is a stressful event for pigs. Travel duration and conditions can negatively affect animal welfare and carcass quality. Some defects in fresh hams are strictly connected to pre-slaughter transportation. Journeys with short (<37 km) and long (>170 km) distances may increase damage in fresh hams and decrease Denomination Protected of Origin (DPO) Parma dry-cured ham production.
Abstract
Pre-slaughter handling is related to defects in fresh hams that result in exclusion from the DPO Parma chain, including hematomas, lacerations, microhaemorrhages and veining. To determine the effects of transport conditions on hams, we collected data on defects in 901,990 trimmed fresh hams from heavy pigs provided by 3,650 batches from slaughterhouse during 2012 and 2013. For all batches, transport distance (1–276 km) season and year of delivery were considered. A decrease of all defect occurrences was observed for increasing distance up to 170 km (P < 0.05). Above 170 km, however, all defects frequencies increased (P < 0.05). Season showed an effect on the incidence of defects, with an increasing of hematomas and lacerations in winter and autumn respectively (P < 0.05) and the highest percentage of veining and hemorrhages in spring (P < 0.05). Summer had the lowest incidence of defects on fresh hams. We concluded that the incidence of the examined defects and the subsequent rejection for DPO Parma ham production is lower in fresh hams transported 38–170 km during the summer.
Keywords: pigs, transport, distance, season, DPO Parma ham, pre-slaughter handling, defect
1. Introduction
Pre-slaughter is known to be a critical period for pigs [1,2], because several factors, i.e., inadequate transport conditions, inappropriate handling [3] and length of the journey [4], can seriously affecting animals welfare both physically and psychologically. Additionally, carcass quality can be adversely affected by inadequate pre-slaughter conditions, such as rough practices of loading and unloading and inappropriate driving style of trucks and pigs that may lead to skin wounds, hemorrhages and hematomas [2]. Increased incidence of blood-splashed and skin damage was found in pigs handled roughly or driven by electric prods during pre-slaughter [5]. These injuries represent a significant economic loss, especially if they are located on the most valuable cuts such as hams, loins and shoulders. According to Von Borrell (2005) [6], transport is considered to be a major stressor might have deleterious effects on product quality. Previous research indicates that pig welfare is affected by both long and short journeys [7]. Mota-Rojas et al. [8] found that the percentage of bruised carcasses increases with journey duration, while Barton Gade and Christensen [9] reported an increased risk of skin damage during short transports (2–3 h), and Gispert et al. [10] found higher skin damage scores in short transports (<2 h) vs. long transports (>2 h).
The effect of the season on pig welfare and carcass quality have been also reported [11,12]. The frequency of skin blemishes, hematomas and blood splashing was shown to increase in winter, probably caused by slips and falls due to slippery icy floor [13,14,15].
Raw hams from heavy pigs (160–170 kg live weight) reared in Northern Italy are primarily processed to DPO (Denomination Protected Origin) dry-cured hams under the control of several consortia, of which Parma Consortium is largest, branding about 10 million dry-cured hams per year (PQI 2014, PQI 2013, Prosciutto di Parma.it) [16,17]. The Parma Quality Institute (PQI) [16] inspects fresh hams destined for the DPO dry-curing process for the presence of an inappropriate physical characteristics like lean-fat ratio or physical injuries, such as hematomas, microhaemorrhages, muscle lacerations and subcutaneous veining caused by pre-slaughter handling; these lesions lead to exclusion of the cuts from the DPO Parma chain. A study of more than 100,000 fresh hams monitored by PQI in 2013 found that 4.3 % of these were rejected for DPO dry-cured ham production due to hematomas, microhaemorrhages, muscle lacerations and subcutaneous veining. Extended to the annual production of fresh hams destined to DPO Parma dry-cured ham equal to 16 million, the total number of fresh hams rejected for pre-slaughter defects could reach 689,000 with an estimated economic loss around 7.6 million euro per year for the whole Parma Consortium and Italian Food Industry.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of transport distance, in connection to the slaughter season, on the incidence of defects observed on fresh hams destined for processing to DPO dry-cured ham.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Data Sampling
This study was carried out in 2012 and 2013 on data collected from 901,990 trimmed fresh hams of heavy pigs provided in 3,650 batches supplied by 411 farmers and slaughtered over 396 days in a single plant located in Northern Italy. Each batch contained 7–151 pigs with an average of 124 animals per batch. All pigs were 9 months old with live weights of kg 171.1 ± 6.1, as required by the Parma dry-cured ham Consortium [18].
2.2. Pre-Slaughter Conditions and Abattoir
Transportation distances from farm to slaughterhouse ranged from 1 to 276 km and average shipping speed based on motorway proximity and road conditions was estimated at 60 km/h. The deliveries were carried out using double trailer lorries with three hydraulic deck. The lorries had natural and mechanical ventilation system, with fans placed on the left side of the trucks. Stocking density during transport was estimated ranging 141–251 kg/m2 and the journey duration ranged 0.25–5 h. The loading was done using the mobile ramp commonly present at the piggery (length m 6.0, width m 0.7, with solid side walls of m. 1.0 and adjustable height), while unloading at the slaughterhouse was carried out by a platform (length m 9.3, width m 2.7, solid side walls m 1.0) with adjustable height at the level of the lower deck. The vehicle was always unloaded before the rear trailer. Lairage time ranged between 30 min to 1.5 h. During this period, pigs were not mixed with unfamiliar animals. Averages and ranges of seasonal temperature and relative humidity during 2012 and 2013 in the area where pigs were transported are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Temperature (°C) and Relative Humidity (%) in the slaughterhouse area during 2012 and 2013.
| Temperature (°C) | Relative Humidity (%) | |||||||||||
| 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | |||||||||
| Average | Range | Average | Range | Average | Range | Average | Range | |||||
| Winter | 3 | −2 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 81 | 58 | 100 | 85 | 69 | 100 |
| Spring | 17 | 11 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 21 | 70 | 44 | 100 | 73 | 50 | 100 |
| Summer | 24 | 17 | 32 | 23 | 16 | 30 | 66 | 39 | 100 | 70 | 42 | 100 |
| Autumn | 10 | 6 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 15 | 83 | 65 | 100 | 86 | 68 | 100 |
Pigs were driven with plastic sticks or rubber boards to resting pens, where they remained 0.5–4.0 h, with only a few batches resting overnight. After resting, pigs were showered and driven through a single chute to the stunning cage. Stunning was accomplished by electrical tongs (head only; 170 V, 1.3 A). Carcasses were then exsanguinated horizontally for 3 min and hanged vertically for 10 min before being immersed into the scalding tank. Carcasses were hot-boned and kept in the cooler (2–4 °C) overnight. The next day, hams were trimmed to the commercial shape, classified for damages and selected according to market criteria.
2.3. Defects Observed
Data on defects such as hematomas, lacerations, microhaemorrhages and superficial veining related to pre-slaughter practices were recorded on trimmed fresh hams. Hematomas are lumps formed by blood clots beneath the skin, typically associated with ruptured blood vessels, that can be produced by impacts against either the handling facilities or improperly used handling prods [3]. Lacerations are similar to dark hematomas distributed in the medial side of the ham and are caused by muscle tears, which may be related to slipping on wet floors during driving. Microhaemorrhages are characterized by pinpoint bleeding in the muscles due to capillary rupture and are generally attributed to rough handling, electrical stunning and vertical exsanguination [19,20,21,22]. Superficial veining is a subcutaneous venous lattice affecting the medial, or sometimes the entire, surface of the thigh. This ham defect appears several hours after slaughter, is particularly noticeable during the dressing process and is still evident at the end of the processing and seasoning [23]. The incidence and severity of the veining defect was found to be associated with the prolongation of pre-slaughter procedures (loading, transport and lairage time), with the use of CO2 stunning methods and with the increase of time between the separation of ham from the hot carcass and chilling from 15 min to 60 min [23]; however, the causes remain largely unexplained [19].
Trimmed hams were classified on the basis of the presence of defects, according to PQI photographic standards, by two trained slaughterhouse operators and recorded in an electronic database according to batch and producer identity. Defects were calculated as percentage per batch.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Batches were classified by distance between supplier and slaughterhouse using the FASTclust procedure of Statistical Analysis System (SAS 9.3 Cary, NC, USA, 2009). Data were assigned to four clusters based on the smallest Euclidean distance from the initial seed in the cluster. The number of batches assigned to each cluster and the respective mean distances, standard deviations (SD) and minimum (min) and maximum (max) distances are reported in Table 2. Slaughter days were grouped into seasons and were monitored over two years to evaluate defect incidence change from year to year. The distribution of batches and pigs between season and year is reported in Table 3. Defect incidences approximated a Poisson distribution and were log transformed by the GLIMMIX procedure (SAS 9.3 Cary, NC, USA) prior to statistical analysis. The model included cluster, season and year and their respective interactions as fixed effects, and farm within day of slaughter as random effects. The ILINK option was used to back-transform least squares means, and differences between least squares means were evaluated by Tukey-Kramer’s test (P < 0.05).
Table 2.
Distance and transport conditions for batches and pigs based on cluster.
| Cluster (Distance) | 1 (11–37 km) | 2 (38–86 km) | 3 (89–170 km) | 4 (199–276 km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of batches | 1,573 | 990 | 347 | 740 |
| No. of pigs | 195,596 | 119,213 | 42,554 | 93,632 |
| Average No. pigs/batch | 124 | 120 | 123 | 127 |
| Distance: | ||||
| -average (km) | 21 | 50 | 121 | 237 |
| -standard deviation (km) | 10 | 9 | 18 | 12 |
| -min (km) | 1 | 38 | 89 | 199 |
| -max (km) | 37 | 86 | 170 | 276 |
| Transport condition: | ||||
| -type of vehicle: | ||||
| single vehicle | 298 | 246 | 74 | 112 |
| double trailer | 1,275 | 744 | 273 | 628 |
| -estimated duration (h) | 0.5 | 1–1.5 | 2–3 | 3–5 |
| -average stocking density (kg/m²) | 213 | 206 | 207 | 218 |
Table 3.
Distribution of batches and pigs based on season and year.
| Cluster (Distance) | 1 (11–37 km) | 2 (38–86 km) | 3 (89–170 km) | 4 (199–276 km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | ||||
| Winter | ||||
| No. of batches | 384 | 200 | 103 | 172 |
| No. of pigs | 47,765 | 24,581 | 12,881 | 21,759 |
| Spring | ||||
| No. of batches | 401 | 266 | 87 | 190 |
| No. of pigs | 49,563 | 31,662 | 10,842 | 24,181 |
| Summer | ||||
| No. of batches | 415 | 256 | 71 | 176 |
| No. of pigs | 50,496 | 30,659 | 8,458 | 22,608 |
| Autumn | ||||
| No. of batches | 373 | 268 | 86 | 202 |
| No. of pigs | 47,772 | 32,311 | 10,373 | 25,048 |
| Year | ||||
| 2012 | ||||
| No. of batches | 780 | 433 | 202 | 373 |
| No. of pigs | 96,406 | 52,193 | 26,148 | 46,808 |
| 2013 | ||||
| No. of batches | 793 | 557 | 145 | 367 |
| No. of pigs | 99,190 | 67,020 | 16,406 | 46,824 |
3. Results and Discussion
In 2012, the incidence of hematomas, lacerations and microhaemorrhages observed in trimmed hams were 4.3%, 1.7% and 1.5%, respectively. In 2013, hematomas increased to 6.2%, while lacerations and microhaemorrhages showed very similar incidences equal to 1.7% and 1.6%, respectively. During the two years, PQI, detected in the whole Parma chain (around 4200 farms and 130 slaughter plants) about twice as much the incidence of these defects [16].
The results of variance analysis and the least-squares means of defects frequency by sources of variation are reported in Table 3. Distance, season and year showed to have a significant effect on the incidence of defects under study. Significant interactions between distance × season and between distance x year were found for hemorrhages, and for hemorrages and veining, respectively. Moreover, there was a significant season x year interaction for hemorrhages, veining and laceration. Incidence of defects decreased with increasing transport distance from Cluster 1 (11–37 km) to Cluster 3 (89–170 km) (P < 0.05). The higher incidence of defects associated with short transport distances may be due to the lack of time to lie down and recovery from loading stress. Also, a reduction of standing pigs and increasing journey duration could explain this result. Lambooij (2007) showed that the percentages of slaughter pigs standing during transport decreased with journey time, which leads to a reduction in risk of slips, falls and overlaps [2]. Additionally, these results could be the consequence of truck drivers working hurriedly to accomplish all planned transports for a given day, as well as the effect of the lower quality of rural roads, which represent the major part of the route in short journeys. Nevertheless, extending of transport distance above 170 km (Cluster 4) results in an increased incidence of defects, which reaches and exceeds the frequency recorded for Cluster 1. There were no differences in hematomas and veining between clusters 4 and 1, while lacerations and hemorrhages incidences were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in Cluster 4. Thus, the incidence of defects reported herein was not proportional to the increase of transport distance. Mota-Rojas et al. [8] observed an increase in pig carcass bruising prolonging the journey from 8 to 23 h. Gallo et al. [24] identified similar trends in slaughter beef transported for 36 h. The incidence of defects on fresh hams was also influenced by season of transport (Table 4). The percentage of hematomas was greatest (P < 0.05) in winter, decreasing in spring and summer (P < 0.05) and reaching the lowest incidence in autumn (P < 0.05). There are no differences between winter, spring and summer for lacerations, while the incidence of this defect was greater (P < 0.05) in autumn. Gosàlvez et al. [15] reported a higher incidence of bruised carcasses in pigs transported in winter and in autumn. Scheeren et al. [13] hypothesize that the greater proportion of skin damage in winter is linked to the tendency of pigs to stand during transportation to avoid making contact with the cold floor and walls of the trailer. Dalla Costa et al. [25] found that pigs were more difficult to handle in winter and need more coercion, which led to more handling-induced bruises. The higher incidence of lacerations observed in autumn could be related to the increase of live weight in this season, due to a restarting of feed intake for the decrease of temperature with respect to the summer. The average live weights recorded by the slaughterhouse during 2012 and 2013 confirms that in autumn there was an increase of more than one kg with respect to the summer (169.1 vs. 170.6 kg in 2012 and 169.4 vs. 170.9 kg in 2013). This seasonal increase of live weight of heavy pigs was also shown by the national slaughter statistics of heavy pigs [26].
Table 4.
Results of variance analysis and least-squares means of defects incidence by sources of variation.
| Sources of variation | Hematomas (%) | Lacerations (%) | Hemorrhages (%) | Veining (%) |
| P / Least squares mean | P / Least squares mean | P / Least squares mean | P / Least squares mean | |
| Distance | 0.0079 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| 1 (11–37 km) | 4.57 a | 1.48 b | 1.32 b | 11.04 a |
| 2 (38–86 km) | 4.44 ab | 1.31 c | 1.34 b | 11.14 a |
| 3 (89–170 km) | 4.08 b | 1.30 bc | 1.08 c | 9.24 b |
| 4 (199–276 km) | 4.78 a | 1.91 a | 1.77 a | 11.50 a |
| Pooled SEM(*) | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.22 |
| Season | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Winter | 6.53 a | 1.32 b | 1.19 b | 12.05 b |
| Spring | 5.88 b | 1.33 b | 1.74 a | 15.23 a |
| Summer | 3.58 c | 1.28 b | 0.96 c | 8.70 c |
| Autumn | 2.87 d | 2.13 a | 1.71 a | 8.18 c |
| Pooled SEM(*) | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.24 |
| Year | <0.0001 | 0.0359 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| 2012 | 3.70 b | 1.42 b | 1.24 b | 9.73 b |
| 2013 | 5.37 a | 1.55 a | 1.48 a | 11.74 a |
| Pooled SEM(*) | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Distance × season | 0.7421 | 0.3412 | 0.0352 | 0.5894 |
| Distance × year | 0.1526 | 0.7083 | 0.0137 | 0.0007 |
| Season × year | 0.1926 | 0.0056 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
(*) SEM: Standard Error of Mean; Means in the same column without the same letter differ significantly (P < 0.05).
The incidence of hemorrhages was greater (P < 0.05) in spring and in autumn while the veining defect was greater in spring. These results cannot easily be attributed to differences in seasonal conditions. The lowest occurrences of lacerations and hemorrhages were found in summer. Warmer temperatures recorded during this season probably lead to a more careful handling in order to reduce the risk of transport mortality [15,25,27]. It is well known that high environmental temperature is a risk factor for transport mortality [28,29].
A significant source of variation in the incidence of raw ham defects was found in studies over several years. The higher incidence of all defects was found in 2013, especially for hematomas and veining. Crisis-invested DPO dry-cured ham production became more important in 2013 with respect to the previous year. It is probably that the reduction of employees for reducing costs lead to an overworking of staff involved in transport and in pre-slaughter handling with a consequent reduction of its quality. The detrimental effect to animal welfare due to overworking of employees involved in animal handling was highlighted by Grandin [30].
Interaction between distance and season (Table 5) affected the incidence of hemorrhages (P < 0.05). The defect increased markedly when distance increased above 170 km in spring and in autumn (P < 0.05). Differences between seasons were observed for less than 37 km distance (Cluster 1), with summer showing the lowest incidence of hemorrhages (P < 0.05). Above this distance, the lowest incidences of the defect were found in summer and in winter (P < 0.05).
Table 5.
Effect of interaction between distance and season on the incidence of hemorrhages.
| Cluster (Distance) | Pooled SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (11–37 km) | 2 (38–86 km) | 3 (89–170 km) | 4 (199–276 km) | ||
| Hemorrhages (%) | |||||
| Winter | 1.36 ab x | 1.14 ab y | 0.87 b y | 1.49 a y | 0.0931 |
| Spring | 1.55 b x | 1.71 b x | 1.58 b x | 2.16 a x | 0.1096 |
| Summer | 0.98 ab y | 1.00 ab y | 0.65 b y | 1.33 a y | 0.0912 |
| Autumn | 1.48 b x | 1.67 b x | 1.52 b x | 2.26 a x | 0.1527 |
Least square means within a row with different letters (a–b) differ (P < 0.05); Least square means within a column with different letters (x–y) differ (P < 0.05).
Interaction between distance and year (Table 6) affected the frequencies of hemorrhages and veining. They increased both in 2012 and 2013 when distance increased above 170 km. The lowest incidences of these defects (P < 0.05) were found for cluster 3 (89–170 km) in 2012 only.
Table 6.
Effect of interaction between distance and year on the incidence of hemorrhages and veining defects.
| Cluster (Distance) | Pooled SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (11–37 km) | 2 (38–86 km) | 3 (89–170 km) | 4 (199–276 km) | ||
| Hemorrhages (%) | |||||
| 2012 | 1.32 a | 1.27 a | 0.91 b | 1.57 a x | 0.0688 |
| 2013 | 1.33 b | 1.42 b | 1.28 b | 1.99 a y | 0.0796 |
| Veining (%) | |||||
| 2012 | 10.39 a x | 10.63 a | 7.63 b x | 10.64 a x | 0.2838 |
| 2013 | 11.73 y | 11.68 | 11.17 y | 12.42 y | 0.3366 |
Least square means within a row with different letters (a–b) differ (P < 0.05); Least square means within a column with different letters (x–y) differ (P < 0.05).
Interaction between season and year (Table 7) affected the incidences of lacerations, hemorrhages and veining. No differences between years were observed for lacerations but these differences appeared for hemorrhages in summer and autumn and for veining in spring, summer and autumn. These results confirmed the effects of the season on the incidences of raw ham defects. With regards to the influence of the year, as stated before, its effect appears related to a reduction of the quality of animal handling.
Table 7.
Effect of interaction between season and year on the incidence of lacerations, hemorrhages and veining defects.
| Season | Pooled SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winter | Spring | Summer | Autumn | ||
| Lacerations (%) | |||||
| 2012 | 1.19 b | 1.31 b | 1.16 b | 2.23 a | 0.0824 |
| 2013 | 1.47 b | 1.35 b | 1.41 b | 2.04 a | 0.0873 |
| Hemorrhages (%) | |||||
| 2012 | 1.28 b | 1.71 a | 0.71 c x | 1.53 b x | 0.0711 |
| 2013 | 1.11 b | 1.76 a | 1.30 b y | 1.90 a y | 0.0802 |
| Veining (%) | |||||
| 2012 | 11.40 b | 17.55 a x | 6.72 c x | 6.60 c x | 0.3040 |
| 2013 | 12.73 a | 13.06 a y | 11.27 ab y | 10.14 b y | 0.3369 |
Least square means within a row with different letters (a–c) differ (P < 0.05); Least square means within a column with different letters (x–y) differ (P < 0.05).
4. Conclusions
The study has examined the effects of travel distances from 1 to 276 km, showing that both short and long journeys may have adverse effects on fresh ham defects. The higher incidence of defects associated with short transport distances may be due to the lack of time to lie down and recovery from loading stress, but probably also to hauliers working quickly to accomplish all planned transports for a given day. Additionally, these results could be related to the lower quality of rural roads, which represent the major part of the route in short journeys. Extending the transport distance above 170 km results in an increased incidence of raw ham defects; the incidence of defects reported herein was not proportional to the increase of transport distance This research highlights the need for Italian pig industry to improve pre-slaughter handling in order to increase the quality of raw hams for DPO production, reducing the economic losses related to inadequate practices before slaughter and increasing the welfare of animals to make it as good as possible. However, additional research is necessary to understand seasonal influences on frequencies of defects on the fresh hams destined for the DPO process.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the technical assistance of quality assurance staff of the abattoir for data collected at the slaughterhouse. This research was supported by Regione Lombardia, Programma di Sviluppo Rurale 2007–2013, Misura 124.
Thank you to authors that collaborated and helped with the preparation of this manuscript. All authors contributed equally to this work.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References and Notes
- 1.Gregory N.G. Animal welfare at markets and during transport and slaughter. Meat Sci. 2008;1:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lambooij E. Transport of Pigs. In: Grandin T., editor. Livestock Handling and Transport. 3rd ed. CABI Publishing; Wallingford, UK: 2007. pp. 228–244. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Grandin T. Handling and Welfare of Livestock in Slaughter Plant. In: Grandin T., editor. Livestock Handling and Transport. 3rd ed. CABI Publishing; Wallingford, UK: 2007. pp. 329–348. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Warris P.D. The welfare of slaughter pigs during transport. Anim. Welfare. 1998;7:365–381. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Correa J.A., Torrey S., Devillers N., Laforest J.P., Gonyou H.W., Faucitano L. Effects of different moving devices at loading on stress response and meat quality in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2010;88:4086–4093. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Von Borell E., Schaffer D. Legal requirements and assessment of stress and welfare during transportation and pre-slaughter handling of pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2005;97:81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Scientific Opinion Concerning the Welfare of Animals during Transport. EFSA J. 2011;9:1–125. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mota-Rojas D., Becerril M., Lemus C., Sanchez P., Gonzalez M., Olmos S.A., Ramırez R., Alonso-Spilsbury M. Effects of mid-summer transport duration on pre- and post-slaughter performance and pork quality in Mexico. Meat Sci. 2006;73:404–412. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barton Gade P., Christensen L. Effect of different stocking densities during transport on welfare and meat quality in danish slaughter pigs. Meat Sci. 1998;48:237–247. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00098-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gispert M., Faucitano L., Oliver M.A., Guardià M.D., Coll C., Siggens K., Harvey K., Diestre A. A survey of pre-slaughter conditions, halothane gene frequency, and carcass and meat quality in five Spanish pig commercial abattoirs. Meat Sci. 2000;55:97–106. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00130-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Torrey S., Bergeron R., Widowski T., Lewis N., Crowe T., Correa J.A., Brown J., Gonyou H.W., Faucitano L. Transportation of market-weight pigs: I. Effect of season, truck type, and location within truck on behavior with a two-hour transport. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;91:2863–2871. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ritter M.J., Ellis M., Bowman R., Brinkmann J., Curtis S.E., DeDecker J.M., Mendoza O., Murphy C.M., Orellana D.G., Peterson B.A., Rojo A., Schlipf J.M., Wolter B.F. Effects of season and distance moved during loading on transport losses of market-weight pigs in two commercially available types of trailer. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;86:3137–3145. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-0873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Scheeren M.B., Gonyou H.W., Brown J., Weschenfelder A.V., Faucitano L. Effects of transport time and location within truck on skin bruises and meat quality of market weight pigs in two seasons. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;94:71–78. doi: 10.4141/cjas2013-136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Correa J.A., Gonyou H.W., Torrey S., Widowski T., Bergeron R., Crowe T.G., Laforest J.P., Faucitano L. Welfare and carcass and meat quality of pigs being transported for two hours using two vehicle types during two seasons of the year. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;93:43–55. doi: 10.4141/cjas2012-088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gosálvez L.F., Averós X., Valdelvira J.J., Herranz A. Influence of season, distance and mixed loads on the physical and carcass integrity of pigs transported to slaughter. Meat Sci. 2006;73:553–558. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Prosciutto di Parma . Dossier 2013. Parma Quality Institute; Langhirano, Italy: 2014. pp. 5–38. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Technical Fact Sheet of Parma Ham. [(accessed on 25 August 2014)]. Available online: http://www.prosciuttodiparma.com/pdf/en_UK/14b_Technical_fact_sheet_Parma_ham_ENG.pdf.
- 18.Prosciutto di Parma (Parma Ham) Protected Designation of Origin. [(accessed on 25 August 2014)]. Available online: http://www.prosciuttodiparma.com/pdf/en_UK/disciplinare.28.11.2013.en.pdf.
- 19.Candek-Potokar M., Skrlep M. Factors in pig production that impact the quality of dry-cured ham: a review. Animal. 2012;6:327–338. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Velarde A., Gispert M., Faucitano L., Manteca X., Diestre A. The effect of stunning method on the incidence of PSE meat and hemorrhages in pork carcasses. Meat Sci. 2000;55:309–314. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00158-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Velarde A., Gispert M., Faucitano L., Alonso P., Manteca X., Diestre A. Effect of the stunning procedure and halothane genotype on meat quality and incidence of hemorrhages in pigs. Meat Sci. 2001;58:313–319. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Channon H.A., Payne A.M., Warner R.D. Comparison of CO(2) stunning with manual electrical stunning (50 Hz) of pigs on carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2002;60:63–68. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00107-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Russo V., Lo Fiego D.P., Nanni Costa L., Tassone F. Study of some factors affecting the incidence of veining defect in thighs destined to dry-cured process of Parma ham; Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig; Tarbes, France. 16–19 November 2004; pp. 277–281. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gallo C., Espinoza M.A., Gasic J. Efectos del transporte por camión durante 36 horas con y sin período de descanso sobre el peso vivo y algunos aspectos de calidad de carne en bovinos. Arch. Med. Vet. 2001;33:43–53. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dalla Costa O.A., Faucitano L., Coldebella A., Ludke J.V., Peloso J.V., dalla Roza D., Paranhos da Costa M.J.R. Effects of the season of the year, truck type and location on truck on skin bruises and meat quality in pigs. Livest. Sci. 2007;107:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.08.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.ISTAT - Istituto Nazionale di Statistica Monthly Data on Red Meat 2012. [(accessed on 25 August 2014)]. Available online: http://agri.istat.it/sag_is_pdwout/jsp/dawinci.jsp.
- 27.Gregory N.G. How climatic changes could affect meat quality. Food Res. Int. 2010;43:1866–1873. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.05.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Warris P.D., Brown S.N. A survey of mortality in slaughter pigs during transport and lairage. Vet. Rec. 1994;134:513–515. doi: 10.1136/vr.134.20.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Riches H.L., Guise H.J., Penny R.H.C., Jones T.A., Cuthbertson A. A national survey of transport conditions for pigs. Pig J. 1996;38:8–18. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Grandin T. Improving Animal Welfare: A Practical Approach. CABI Publishing; Wallingford, UK: 2010. The Effect of Economic Factors on the Welfare of Livestock and Poultry; pp. 214–226. [Google Scholar]