Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the primary cause of death and disability in younger individuals [1]. To date, the mechanism behind the cognitive dysfunction following TBI remains unclear. Neurotransmitters (NT) represent a particularly important system in physiological events relevant to cognition affected by TBI [2]. Preclinical evaluations of both agonists and antagonists affecting acetylcholine (Ach) and the dopamine (DA) system have shown marked benefits for cognitive recovery.
Hence, the aim of this article is to outline clinical studies that have shown potential efficacy of Ach- and DA-oriented medications in the treatment of TBI.
PubMed was used to search for articles published since 1998 that reported any association between cognitive dysfunction following TBI. Before 1998, no clinical studies regarding the neurotransmitter-targeted therapies in TBI had been reported. After reviewing the abstracts, 14 articles were submitted to the final evidence review.
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are most beneficial for the treatment of posttraumatic cognitive impairments [3]. Principally, rivastigmine improved the cognitive function in TBI patients [4]. However, the results from randomized controlled trials have remained modest [5]. Zhang et al. [6] performed a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover trial to demonstrate sustained improvements in immediate auditory and visual memory, attention, working memory and information processing speed. An open-label study conducted by Tenovuo [7] also found a subjective and longer (average 24 months) improvement following donepezil (summarized in Table I).
Table I.
Study | Design | Participants | Interventions | Primary outcomes | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Silver et al. | 26-week double-blind open-label | 134 adults with TBI | 12 mg daily of rivastigmine | Verbal learning test visual information processing | An extension study |
Tenuvuo et al. | 8-week | 69 patients with TBI | 12 mg daily rivastigmine | Computerized neuropsychological testing and standardized clinical interviews | A weak trend favoring rivastigmine was observed |
Zhang et al. | RCT crossover, double blind | 18 participants with mild-severe TBI | 5–10 mg/day of donepezil | * AII, VII PASAT | |
Tenovuo et al. | Retrospective pseudo-randomized cohort | 111 patients with mild to moderate TBI | 5 mg/day of donepezil 4 mg/day of galantamine 1.5 mg/day of rivastigmine | Self-assessment rated from no response to excellent response | No differences were found among the three drugs |
AII indicates Auditory Immediate Index, VII – Visual Immediate Index, PASAT – Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test.
Dopamine represents a unique role in the NT system within the central nervous system (CNS) due to its influences on a number of physiologic functions including working memory, behavioral flexibility, and decision making [8].
In 2006, the Neurotrauma Foundation (NTF) recommended three drugs with DAergic effects to be used in TBI patients to enhance cognitive recovery and rehabilitation [9]. The identified drugs were methylphenidate (MPD), amantadine hydrochloride (AMH), and bromocriptine [9].
Multiple studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of MPD used in TBI patients with cognitive dysfunction especially in information processing speed [10], attention [11, 12], alertness [13], and working memory [14] after brain trauma. However, there is no longer than six months follow-up in the clinical trials regarding MPD in patients with TBI.
Amantadine hydrochloride has also been found to be effective at treating cognitive dysfunction post-TBI in both clinical trials and case reports. Kraus et al. [15] showed that AMH treatment improved prefrontal executive function in TBI patients correlated with an increase in left prefrontal cortex glucose metabolism. Patrick et al. [16] reported that AMH accelerated recovery of attention deficit in children with a lower response following brain injury.
Bromocriptine is a specific D2 receptor agonist, and a past case report [17] showed improvements in motor function and executive function after administering bromocriptine in a severe TBI patient associated with Parkinson's syndrome. In contrast, McDowell et al. did not find that bromocriptine appeared to improve attentional difficulties in moderate to severe TBI patients. However, this study employed a relatively high dose of bromocriptine at 10 mg/day for a more prolonged treatment period than previously studied in TBI [18]. In addition, a 6-week placebo-controlled pilot study showed that bromocriptine in TBI patients also did not enhance attentional skills [19] (summarized in Table II).
Table II.
Study | Design | Participants | Interventions | Primary outcomes | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whyte et al. | 6-week double-blind placebo-controlled repeated crossover study | 34 adults with moderate to severe TBI and attention complaints | 0.3 mg/kg dose MPD, twice a day | Processing speed Work attentiveness Caregiver rating of attention Reaction time | |
Pavlovskaya et al. | 4-week | 6 patients with severe TBI | 5–10 mg/day of MPD | Author-modified Attention based performance | No objective assessment |
Willmott et al. | RCT, crossover, double blind | 40 participants with moderate-severe TBI | 0.3 mg/kg twice daily of MPD | Processing speed Selective attention task Dissimilar compatible | |
Lee et al. | 4 week double-blind parallel-group trial | 30 patients with mild to moderate TBI | 5–20 mg/day of MPD | MMSE | |
Kim et al. | Double-blind placebo-controlled study | 18 subjects with TBI | 20 mg/day of MPD | Working memory and visuospatial attention tasks | |
Kraus et al. | An open-label design | Twenty-two subjects with TBI | 400 mg/day of AMH | Neuropsychological test Executive function | |
Patrick et al. | A retrospective review | 10 children with severe TBI and a low response state | 100–400 mg/day of AMH | Arousal/attention and auditory response Expressive communication visual response Tactile response and olfactory response | |
Ben et al. | Case report | An old patient with severe TBI associated with PD | AMH (unknown dose) | Author modified tests Motor function and cognitive function | |
McDowell et al. | RCT cross over | 24 patients with severe TBI | 1 dose of bromocriptine | Executive function | No effect on the working memory Related to prefrontal function |
McAllister et al. | Unblinded controlled study | 26 individuals with mild TBI | 1.25 mg bromocriptine | A neuropsychological test battery |
This brief review has sought to summarize the evidence that supports an NT-oriented hypothesis of cognitive dysfunction after TBI and provide a context for the use of Ach and DA targeted therapies during patient rehabilitation.
In conclusion, it seems that applications of AChE inhibitors and DA agonists are beneficial in TBI patients with cognitive dysfunction.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Bruns J, Hauser WA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. Epilepsia. 2003;44:2–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s10.3.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mirzaie B, Mohajeri-Tehrani MR, Annabestani Z, et al. Traumatic brain injury and adrenal insufficiency: morning cortisol and cosyntropin stimulation tests. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9:68–73. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.30833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chew E, Zafonte RD. Pharmacological management of neurobehavioral disorders following traumatic brain injury: a state-of-the-art review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;46:851–79. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.09.0120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Silver JM, Koumaras B, Meng X, et al. Long-term effects of rivastigmine capsules in patients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2009;23:123–32. doi: 10.1080/02699050802649696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ballesteros J, Güemes I, Ibarra N, Quemada JI. The effectiveness of donepezil for cognitive rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23:171–80. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000319935.99837.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang L, Plotkin RC, Wang G, Sandel ME, Lee S. Cholinergic augmentation with donepezil enhances recovery in short-term memory and sustained attention after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1050–5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tenovuo O. Central acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of chronic traumatic brain injury-clinical experience in 111 patients. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004;29:61–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Floresco SB, Magyar O. Mesocortical dopamine modulation of executive functions: beyond working memory. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;188:567–85. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0404-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Warden DL, Gordon B, McAllister TW, et al. Guidelines for the pharmacologic treatment of neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:1468–501. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Whyte J, Hart T, Vaccaro M, et al. Effects of methylphenidate on attention deficits after traumatic brain injury: a multidimensional, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83:401–20. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000128789.75375.d3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pavlovskaya M, Hochstein S, Keren O, Mordvinov E, Groswasser Z. Methylphenidate effect on hemispheric attentional imbalance in patients with traumatic brain injury: a psychophysical study. Brain Inj. 2007;21:489–97. doi: 10.1080/02699050701311117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Willmott C, Ponsford J. Efficacy of methylphenidate in the rehabilitation of attention following traumatic brain injury: a randomised, crossover, double blind, placebo controlled inpatient trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:552–7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.159632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee HH, Kim WS, Kim MJ, et al. Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2005;20:97–104. doi: 10.1002/hup.668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim HY, Ko HM, Na YS, Park HS, Kim WK. Effects of single-dose methylphenidate on cognitive performance in patients with traumatic brain injury: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:24–30. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr927oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kraus MF, Smith GS, Butters M, et al. Effects of the dopaminergic agent and NMDA receptor antagonist amantadine on cognitive function, cerebral glucose metabolism and D2 receptor availability in chronic traumatic brain injury: a study using positron emission tomography (PET) Brain Inj. 2005;19:471–9. doi: 10.1080/02699050400025059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Patrick PD, Buck ML, Conaway MR, Blackman JA. The use of dopamine enhancing medications with children in low response states following brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003;17:497–506. doi: 10.1080/0269905031000070279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ben SD, Samuel C, Rouy-Thenaisy K, Régnault J, Azouvi P. Bromocriptine in traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20:111–5. doi: 10.1080/02699050500309700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McDowell S, Whyte J, D'Esposito M. Differential effect of a dopaminergic agonist on prefrontal function in traumatic brain injury patients. Brain. 1998;121:1155–64. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.6.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McAllister TW, Flashman LA, McDonald BC, et al. Dopaminergic challenge with bromocriptine one month after mild traumatic brain injury: altered working memory and BOLD response. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;23:277–86. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.23.3.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]