Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 19;6(11):9397–9408. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3351

Table 1. Correlation of CIP4 expression with clinicopathological and molecular features of human invasive ductal carcinomas.

Feature Total (n = 245) CIP4 IHC staining p-valueb
CIP4 lowa CIP4 higha
(n = 201) % (n = 44) %
Age 0.315
 range 24 – 50 95 75 79 20 21
 range 51 – 92 150 126 84 24 16
 age (mean ± s.d.) 56 ± 0.89 54.8 ± 1.77
Menopausal status 0.821
 Pre 91 74 81 17 19
 Post 154 127 82 27 18
Tumor Size (cm) 0.118
 ≤ 2 30 27 90 3 10
 > 2 and ≤ 5 139 117 84 22 16
 > 5 76 57 75 19 25
Tumor Grade 0.301
 1 37 33 89 4 11
 2 141 117 83 24 17
 3 66 51 77 15 23
 n.d.c 1
Tumor Stage 0.041
 1 + 2 145 125 86 20 14
 3 + 4 100 76 76 24 24
Lymph node status 0.508
 Negative 86 73 85 13 15
 Positive 157 128 82 29 18
ER < 0.001
 Negative 71 47 66 24 34
 Positive 174 154 89 20 11
PR < 0.001
 Negative 114 82 72 32 28
 Positive 131 119 91 12 9
HER2 0.025
 Negative 210 177 84 33 16
 Positive 35 24 69 11 31
Perou/Sorlie classification < 0.001
 Luminal 182 162 89 20 11
 HER2 22 13 59 9 41
 Basal-Like 41 26 63 15 37
a

CIP4 low: Positivity < 0.87, CIP4 high: Positivity ≥ 0.87; Percentages of samples for each variable are shown in parentheses; values in bold indicate statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05); s.d. means standard deviation;

b

p values to evaluate the dependency between each variable and CIP4 staining were calculated using a Chi-square test;

c

n.d. means no data