Table 1. Correlation of CIP4 expression with clinicopathological and molecular features of human invasive ductal carcinomas.
Feature | Total (n = 245) | CIP4 IHC staining | p-valueb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIP4 lowa | CIP4 higha | |||||
(n = 201) | % | (n = 44) | % | |||
Age | 0.315 | |||||
range 24 – 50 | 95 | 75 | 79 | 20 | 21 | |
range 51 – 92 | 150 | 126 | 84 | 24 | 16 | |
age (mean ± s.d.) | 56 ± 0.89 | 54.8 ± 1.77 | ||||
Menopausal status | 0.821 | |||||
Pre | 91 | 74 | 81 | 17 | 19 | |
Post | 154 | 127 | 82 | 27 | 18 | |
Tumor Size (cm) | 0.118 | |||||
≤ 2 | 30 | 27 | 90 | 3 | 10 | |
> 2 and ≤ 5 | 139 | 117 | 84 | 22 | 16 | |
> 5 | 76 | 57 | 75 | 19 | 25 | |
Tumor Grade | 0.301 | |||||
1 | 37 | 33 | 89 | 4 | 11 | |
2 | 141 | 117 | 83 | 24 | 17 | |
3 | 66 | 51 | 77 | 15 | 23 | |
n.d.c | 1 | |||||
Tumor Stage | 0.041 | |||||
1 + 2 | 145 | 125 | 86 | 20 | 14 | |
3 + 4 | 100 | 76 | 76 | 24 | 24 | |
Lymph node status | 0.508 | |||||
Negative | 86 | 73 | 85 | 13 | 15 | |
Positive | 157 | 128 | 82 | 29 | 18 | |
ER | < 0.001 | |||||
Negative | 71 | 47 | 66 | 24 | 34 | |
Positive | 174 | 154 | 89 | 20 | 11 | |
PR | < 0.001 | |||||
Negative | 114 | 82 | 72 | 32 | 28 | |
Positive | 131 | 119 | 91 | 12 | 9 | |
HER2 | 0.025 | |||||
Negative | 210 | 177 | 84 | 33 | 16 | |
Positive | 35 | 24 | 69 | 11 | 31 | |
Perou/Sorlie classification | < 0.001 | |||||
Luminal | 182 | 162 | 89 | 20 | 11 | |
HER2 | 22 | 13 | 59 | 9 | 41 | |
Basal-Like | 41 | 26 | 63 | 15 | 37 |
CIP4 low: Positivity < 0.87, CIP4 high: Positivity ≥ 0.87; Percentages of samples for each variable are shown in parentheses; values in bold indicate statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05); s.d. means standard deviation;
p values to evaluate the dependency between each variable and CIP4 staining were calculated using a Chi-square test;
n.d. means no data