Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Biochem. 2015 Feb 20;484:169–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.02.014

Determination of concentration and activity of immobilized enzymes

Priyanka Singh 1, Holly Morris 1, Alexei V Tivanski 1, Amnon Kohen 1,*
PMCID: PMC4497861  NIHMSID: NIHMS666518  PMID: 25707319

Abstract

Methods that directly measure the concentration of surface-immobilized biomolecules are scarce. More commonly the concentration of the soluble molecule is measured before and after immobilization, and the bound concentration is assessed by elimination, assuming that all bound molecules are active. An assay was developed for measuring the active-sites concentration, activity, and thereby the catalytic turnover rate (kcat) of an immobilized dihydrofolate reductase as a model system. The new method yielded a similar first order rate constant, kcat, to that of the same enzyme in solution. The findings indicate that the activity of the immobilized enzyme, when separated from the surface by the DNA spacers, has not been altered. Additionally, a new immobilization method is described that leads to solution-like activity of the enzyme on the surface. The approaches developed here for immobilization and for determining the concentration of an immobilized enzyme is general and can be extended to other enzymes, receptors, and antibodies.

Keywords: Immobilization, activity assay, radiolabeled inhibitor, dihydrofolate reductase


The analytical determination of the concentration and kinetic properties of immobilized enzymes are of great contemporary interest in biotechnology and biochemical research. Enzymes are nature’s sustainable catalysts and their use in the field of biotechnology is of both industrial and academic contemporary interest. These biological catalysts exhibit a remarkable rate enhancement and are capable of speeding the chemical reactions up to 20 orders of magnitude with respect to the corresponding reaction in solution [1]. Moreover, enzymes are biocompatible, biodegradable and are derived from renewable resources which makes their use in industry more environmentally friendly, cost-effective and sustainable as compared to conventional techniques [2]. Since they also provide excellent selectivity for their target substrate and have high catalytic activity, enzymes are increasingly being used in diverse industries and hence are an important topic of research [3].

There is currently a great demand to enhance enzyme productivity and develop novel techniques to improve their shelf life [4]. Enzyme immobilization is an approach that provides excellent platform for increasing the durability of enzymes for a variety of industrial applications. Additionally, the immobilization of these catalysts enables their use in flow-based bioreactors where the catalyst can be maintained in the reactor via mechanical or magnetic attachment to the reaction chamber (e.g., fixed catalytic beads or bio-coated magnetic beads) [5]. Moreover, several methods for basic research require immobilized enzymes (e.g., single-molecule or mono-layer studies) [57]. Broadly, methods of enzyme immobilization can be divided into three categories: binding to a support, entrapment, or encapsulation and cross linking [3, 4]. The method used in the current study for immobilization involves binding the enzyme to a mica chip support through dsDNA spacers. An ideal immobilization should yield a stable biocatalyst while minimizing distortions in its structure and function. However, in many cases, immobilization results in a decreased enzyme activity, and only a few examples where the activity is unaltered or even increased [8]. Importantly, in all cases it is critical to check enzyme activity after immobilization, and determine the effective concentration of active sites available after immobilization. One of the major problems faced in studying the activity of immobilized enzymes arises from the lack of accurate assays using conventional spectroscopic methods due to the presence of solid support. Another common problem is calculating active site concentrations, since the enzyme is immobilized on a solid surface and therefore inaccessible to conventional biochemical techniques. Traditionally, the estimation of immobilized enzyme on the support is calculated from the enzyme content in the solution before and after immobilization [911]. But because this is an indirect method, it is not likely to give the actual active site concentration. Consequently, there is a need of an assay that can directly measure concentration of the immobilized enzyme, or, ideally, the number of available active sites.

In the present study we have developed an assay to measure the concentration of active site, activity, and thereby the specific activity of an immobilized enzyme on a solid support at a sub-monolayer concentration level. We have used dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) from Escherichia coli as a model enzyme system because of its small size, lack of metal cofactors or disulfide bonds, and its medicinal importance. DHFR catalyzes the transfer of the pro-R hydride from the C4 position of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) to the si-face of 5,6-dihydrofolate (DHF), forming S-5,6,7,8,-tetrahydrofolate (THF) and NADP+ as shown in Fig. 1a. Since this enzyme is critical in nucleotide biosynthesis, it is a target for many chemotherapeutic and antibacterial drugs [1214].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a) DHFR catalyzes the stereospecific transfer of hydride from C4 of NADPH to C6 of DHF, producing the product THF and oxidized cofactor NADP+. b) Atomic force microscopy image of immobilized DHFR on mica chip with dsDNA spacers c) Radiogram showing RP-HPLC separation of products ([Ad-14C]-NADP+) and reactants ([Ad-14C]-NADPH) from the kinetic assay of immobilized DHFR activity. The green line is the starting material (i.e. reaction mixture at 0 min); the blue line is the reaction mixture at 15 min; and the red line is the reaction mixture at 80 min; d) Fraction conversion versus time plot.

DHFR immobilization

DHFR from E. coli was expressed, purified, and stored as described elsewhere [15, 16] and was immobilized on a mica chip surface using labeled dsDNA spacers (see sequence and more details in the enclosed Supplementary Information, SI). The 5′ end of one strand of DNA was labeled with a thiol while the 5′ end of the complementary strand ends with an amino group. The amino end of the dsDNA was attached to an activated mica chip surface [17, 18], while the thiol end was attached to a surface cysteine (remote from the enzyme’s active site, C152) via a disulfide bond. Fig. 2 shows a schematic cartoon of the immobilized DHFR on mica chip with dsDNA spacers. The functionalized DNA can be stored for long period of time, and it is relatively simple to chemically modify or functionalize as needed. Such spacers enable a variety of applications including the recovery and reconfiguration of biosensor surfaces and fabrication of arrays in generation of biochips [19].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic illustration of the immobilized DHFR on mica chip with dsDNA spacers. The surface Cys residue of DHFR was attached to thiol-labeled dsDNA bound to a mica surface via a terminal amino end.

Activity assay

Conventional techniques to measure enzyme activity are not accessible for the immobilized enzyme on solid surface. We therefore used a radiometric-based assay. Since DHFR is NADPH dependent enzyme, NADPH labelled with 14C on the adenine ring ([Ad-14C]-NADPH) was used to follow 14C-NADP+ (product) formation as a function of time using HPLC and liquid scintillation analysis. The synthesis of [Ad-14C]-NADPH and HPLC separation methods have previously been described [20, 21]. The reaction was carried out at 25 °C with 100 μM [Ad-14C]-NADPH, 100 μM DHF in MTEN buffer (50 mM MES, 25 mM Tris, 25 mM ethanolamine, and 100 mM sodium chloride, pH 7.5) and initiated by adding the mica chip with the immobilized enzyme. Aliquots were removed from the reaction mixture at different time points to measure fraction conversions ranging from 1–30% [7, 22]. Fig. 1c. shows a typical RP-HPLC radiogram illustrating the separation of product ([Ad-14C]-NADP+) and reactant ([Ad-14C]-NADPH). The fraction conversion (f) of was determined from Fig. 1c. using equation 1, which is the ratio of 14C in products to the total 14C [22, 23]:

f=[Ad-C14]NADP+[Ad-C14]NADP++[Ad-C14]NADPH (1)

The Vmax (product per second under saturating substrates concentrations) was determined by a linear fit of at least three time points. To assure saturation of both substrates the rate was measured at different concentrations of NADPH and DHF ranging from 100 μM to 1 mM. The fact that the rate is independent of substrate concentration indicates that the mass flow of substrate does not affect the measured rate. Fig. 1d. shows a representative time course. The Vmax value by itself could be characteristic of the chip if reported per surface area or per weight. However, such value is not a rate constant and cannot be used to compare the properties of the immobilized enzyme to the same enzyme in solution. Dividing Vmax with the enzyme concentration (see assay below) gives the first order rate constant kcat. The value found in this case was 6.7 ± 0.6 s−1, which is in good agreement with the reported value of 8–12 s−1 for the same enzyme in solution [14].

Determination of active sites concentration

The activity measured above can be used as units per chip surface or per particle weight. However, activity value without knowledge of active site concentration is not a measure of a rate constant or otherwise characteristic of the system. Hence, it is critical to measure the concentration of active sites so the measured activity can be converted to a rate constant or a meaningful specific activity value. The distribution of immobilized enzyme on mica chip is random and might consist of regions with bundles and a non-uniform distribution, which can be seen from the atomic force microscopy (see more details about imaging in the enclosed Supplementary Information, SI) image in Fig. 1b. Consequently, to the best of our knowledge there is no good method reported in the literature to estimate the active site concentration of surface immobilized enzyme under such low number density of enzymes. Since the enzyme distribution on the chip is not uniform, imaging a section of the enzyme immobilized surface using atomic force microscopy and then calculating the number for the whole chip may not give accurate results. Furthermore, it is practically not possible to scan the whole chip to determine the number of bound enzyme molecules due to the time required for data collection and analysis. A new method that can accurately measure the active site concentration of surface immobilized enzyme was developed by utilizing radiolabeled methotrexate, a picomolar inhibitor of DHFR to determine the concentration of immobilized enzyme. After measuring the activity of the immobilized enzyme (see above), the same chip was used to measure the enzyme concentration. The chip was washed with MTEN buffer and then incubated in 0.5 mM tritium labeled methotrexate disodium salt, [3′,5′,7-3H(N)], 10 Ci/mmol (Moravek Biochemicals, Inc.), for 30 minutes. The chip was washed again several times with MTEN buffer, until no radioactivity was found in the washing liquid, to ensure that there was no unbound methotrexate remaining. A bare mica chip and the chip functionalized with DNA, but lacking DHFR was treated in the same manner and used as a control. The results showed that methotrexate does not bind either to the bare chip or to the functionalized chip lacking an enzyme. Radioactivity was measured using a liquid scintillation counter, and the specific radioactivity (10 Ci/mmol) was used to calculate the number of inhibitor bound to DHFR, which in turn gave moles of the immobilized enzyme, or more specifically its available active sites. Dividing this number (in moles) by the volume of the reaction mixture used for the activity measurements (above) yield the concentration of the enzyme, and was used to calculate the rate constant. DHFR concentration to rate relation (calibration curve) was linear as can be seen in Fig. S1.

Summary

Enzyme immobilization on a solid surface is a valuable practice to preserve catalytic activity and for a wide range of biotechnological applications (e.g., bioreactors, nanosensors, single-molecule studies, etc.). Here, we developed a novel technique to measure the concentration and activity of DHFR immobilized on a solid surface at sub-monolayer coverage. The concentration of immobilized enzyme was measured using a radiolabelled inhibitor. The kcat was then calculated from the measured activity and active sites concentration, and was similar to the rate constant for the enzyme in solution. In this specific case, the finding suggests that the immobilization method used (rigid dsDNA spacer) has not modified the catalytic turnover rate (kcat) of the enzyme. Most enzymes have tight-binding inhibitors that can be labeled radioactively, and thus the approach used here can be similarly extended to many other immobilized enzymes. Because of the importance of surface immobilized enzymes in multiple fields, the approach has a great potential of assisting in the analytical determination of active site concentration of a wide variety of immobilized enzymes on solid surfaces or nanoparticles.

Supplementary Material

supplement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH research grants GM65368 and NSF grant CHE-0133117.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Wolfenden R. Degrees of Difficulty of Water-Consuming Reactions in the Absence of Enzymes. Chem Rev. 2006;106:3379–3396. doi: 10.1021/cr050311y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kazlauskas RJ, Kim B-G. Biotechnology Tools for Green Synthesis: Enzymes, Metabolic Pathways, and their Improvement by Engineering, Biocatalysis for Green Chemistry and Chemical Process Development. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2011. pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sheldon RA, van Pelt S. Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: why, what and how. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:6223–6235. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60075k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Datta S, Christena LR, Rajaram Y. Enzyme immobilization: an overview on techniques and support materials, 3. Biotech. 2013;3:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s13205-012-0071-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sassolas A, Hayat A, Marty J-L. Immobilization of Enzymes on Magnetic Beads Through Affinity Interactions. In: Guisan JM, editor. Immobilization of Enzymes and Cells. Humana Press; 2013. pp. 139–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Besteman K, Lee J-O, Wiertz FGM, Heering HA, Dekker C. Enzyme-Coated Carbon Nanotubes as Single-Molecule Biosensors. Nano Lett. 2003;3:727–730. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ditzler LR, Sen A, Gannon MJ, Kohen A, Tivanski AV. Self-Assembled Enzymatic Monolayer Directly Bound to a Gold Surface: Activity and Molecular Recognition Force Spectroscopy Studies. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:13284–13287. doi: 10.1021/ja205409v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rodrigues RC, Ortiz C, Berenguer-Murcia A, Torres R, Fernandez-Lafuente R. Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:6290–6307. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35231a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gashtasbi F, Ahmadian G, Noghabi KA. New insights into the effectiveness of alpha-amylase enzyme presentation on the Bacillus subtilis spore surface by adsorption and covalent immobilization. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2014;64–65:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leão-Silva AC, Naves AF, Pereira EMA, Petri DFS, Carmona-Ribeiro AM. Assembly of horseradish peroxidase within supported cationic bilayers. Biotech Progress. 2011;27:1433–1441. doi: 10.1002/btpr.640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aybaster O, Sahin S, Isk E, Demir C. Determination of total phenolic content in Prunella L. by horseradish peroxidase immobilized onto chitosan beads. Anal Meth. 2011;3:2289–2297. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hammes-Schiffer S, Benkovic SJ. Relating Protein Motion to Catalysis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006;75:519–541. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sawaya MR, Kraut J. Loop and Subdomain Movements in the Mechanism of Escherichia coli Dihydrofolate Reductase: Crystallographic Evidence†,‡. Biochemistry. 1997;36:586–603. doi: 10.1021/bi962337c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fierke CA, Johnson KA, Benkovic SJ. Construction and evaluation of the kinetic scheme associated with dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1987;26:4085–4092. doi: 10.1021/bi00387a052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cameron CE, Benkovic SJ. Evidence for a Functional Role of the Dynamics of Glycine-121 of Escherichia coli Dihydrofolate Reductase Obtained from Kinetic Analysis of a Site-Directed Mutant†. Biochemistry. 1997;36:15792–15800. doi: 10.1021/bi9716231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rajagopalan PTR, Lutz S, Benkovic SJ. Coupling Interactions of Distal Residues Enhance Dihydrofolate Reductase Catalysis: Mutational Effects on Hydride Transfer Rates†. Biochemistry. 2002;41:12618–12628. doi: 10.1021/bi026369d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gu C, Ray C, Guo S, Akhremitchev BB. Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy Measurements of Interactions between C60 Fullerene Molecules. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:12898–12905. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beier M, Hoheisel JD. Versatile derivatisation of solid support media for covalent bonding on DNA-microchips. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1970–1977. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.9.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meyer R, Giselbrecht S, Rapp BE, Hirtz M, Niemeyer CM. Advances in DNA-directed immobilization. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2014;18:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Markham KA, Sikorski RS, Kohen A. Synthesis and utility of 14C-labeled nicotinamide cofactors. Anal Biochem. 2004;325:62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2003.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Markham KA, Steven Sikorski R, Kohen A. Purification, analysis, and preservation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2′-phosphate. Anal Biochem. 2003;322:26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2003.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Singh P, Sen A, Francis K, Kohen A. Extension and Limits of the Network of Coupled Motions Correlated to Hydride Transfer in Dihydrofolate Reductase. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:2575–2582. doi: 10.1021/ja411998h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang Z, Singh P, Czekster CM, Kohen A, Schramm VL. Protein Mass-Modulated Effects in the Catalytic Mechanism of Dihydrofolate Reductase: Beyond Promoting Vibrations. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:8333–8341. doi: 10.1021/ja501936d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES