Editorial Comment: Vulvodynia, or idiopathic vulvar pain, is a frequent cause of sexual pain, now classified as genito-pelvic pain in the DSM-5 [1]. Vulvodynia adversely impacts women’s sexual health, psychological well-being, and quality of life. Unfortunately, most studies in the area, both biomedical and psychosocial, are characterized by relatively small clinical samples. This significant limitation introduces a selection bias associated with clinically referred participants, who typically show higher levels of symptomatology. The field is in dire need of large-scale community-based studies; such data will inform scientists and health care providers about population prevalence, help-seeking behaviors and attitudes, and risk factors for the development of this neglected women’s sexual health issue.
One such important study was recently published [2]. Bernard Harlow and his team gathered epidemiologic data from 5,440 premenopausal women from three ethnically diverse neighborhoods and two west suburban communities of the Boston metropolitan area (BMA) between 2001 and 2005, and 13,681 from all geographic locations within the Minneapolis/St Paul metropolitan area (MSP) between 2010 and 2012. Participants completed the self-report measures concerning their history of vulvar pain that interfered with vaginal intercourse and that lasted more than 3 months. Participants from BMA were systematically sampled from census-based directories, and those from MSP stemmed from an administrative database of women who were seen for any reason at one of several outpatient community clinics within that defined geographic region.
Although boasting large representative samples, community-based studies have the inevitable disadvantage of needing to forego more in-depth assessment of study participants. In the case of vulvodynia, this may mean that women cannot take part in a gynecological examination to confirm their diagnosis. To circumvent this caveat, Harlow and colleagues first developed a vulvar pain questionnaire which has shown 83% sensitivity and 94% specificity for meeting a medical diagnosis of vulvodynia, based on the cotton swab test and other elements of clinical examination to rule out potential known causes of vulvar pain [3].
To determine age-specific cumulative incidence in the present study, the authors defined vulvodynia as pain on contact in the last 6 months that limited or prevented intercourse. Results indicate that for both samples, the rate of first onset of vulvodynia was highest prior to the age of 25 years, decreased during the late 20s and early 30s, and then increased in participants’ late 30s. These results are similar to what is often observed clinically when speaking to women with sexual pain. Interestingly, women of Hispanic ethnicity were at an increased risk of developing vulvodynia.
Overall, 7–8% of women in this study reported symptoms consistent with vulvodynia by age 40. Among women with vulvodynia, between 30% and 48% never sought treatment; unfortunately, over 50% of those who sought care never received a diagnosis. Those with primary vulvodynia (i.e., pain on genital contact/intercourse since the first vaginal intercourse attempt) were more likely to have sought treatment compared with women with secondary vulvodynia (i.e., pain after a period of pain-free intercourse).
Two significant conclusions can be drawn from this study. First, vulvodynia is a highly prevalent condition that is often neglected by many health care professionals. Potential explanations for failure to address the issue in practice include ignorance, lack of training, discomfort discussing sexuality, and feelings of helplessness in the face of a persistent yet private pain condition that is challenging to treat. Second, almost half of women with vulvodynia do not seek treatment; even those women who do seek treatment are frequently frustrated by failure to receive a diagnosis. One may glean from this that existing studies on vulvodynia based on clinical samples represent a self-selected, limited, and biased group of women. Given that the best available data may be based on a biased population, it may be inferred that accurate knowledge on vulvodynia is less than accurate, even among sexual medicine specialists.
References
-
1.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. [Google Scholar]
-
2.Harlow BL, Kunitz CG, Nguyen RH, Rydell SA, Turner RM, MacLehose RF. Prevalence of symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of vulvodynia: Population-based estimates from 2 geographic regions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:40.e1–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.033. . doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
3.Harlow BL, Vazquez G, MacLehose RF, Erickson DJ, Oakes JM, Duval SJ. Self-reported vulvar pain characteristics and their association with clinically confirmed vestibulodynia. J Womens Health. 2009;18:1333–1339. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]