Abstract
Background:
Shigella species are among the common causes of bacterial diarrhoeal diseases. Traditional detection methods are time-consuming resulting in delay in treatment and control of Shigella infections thus there is a need to develop molecular methods for rapid and simultaneous detection of Shigella spp. In this study a rapid multiplex PCR were developed for simultaneous detection of three pathogenic Shigella species.
Methods:
For detection of Shigella spp., a pair of primers was used to replicate a chromosomal sequence. Three other sets of primers were also designed to amplify the target genes of three most common species of Shigella in Iran including S. sonnei, S. flexneri and S. boydii. The multiplex PCR assay was optimized for simultaneous detection and differentiation of three pathogenic Shigella species. The assay specificity was investigated by testing different strains of Shigella and other additional strains belonging to non Shigella species, but responsible for foodborne diseases.
Results:
The Shigella genus specific PCR yielded the expected DNA band of 159 bp in all tested strains belonging to four Shigella species. The standard and multiplex PCR assays also produced the expected fragments of 248 bp, 503 bp, and 314 bp, for S. boydii, S. sonnei and S. flexneri, respectively. Each species-specific primer pair did not show any cross-reactivity.
Conclusion:
Both standard and multiplex PCR protocols had a good specificity. They can provide a valuable tool for the rapid and simultaneous detection and differentiation of three most prevalent Shigella species in Iran.
Keywords: Multiplex-PCR, Shigella spp., Shigellosis
Introduction
Shigella species annually cause an estimated 164.7 million cases of shigellosis worldwide, resulting in 1.1 million deaths (1). Shigellosis as an endemic disease in Iran is one of the major causes of morbidity in children with diarrhea in this country (2–4).
There are many ways for detection of Shigella species including conventional culture and molecular methods (5). Conventional methods are usually problematic process and require several days to give results (6). Moreover, these methods are relying on the viable organisms to multiply in media. Taken as a whole, conventional methods have less sensitive because there is not enough number of organisms in some specimen and the numbers of organisms decrease during specimen transport (5). In many studies, molecular methods for detection of Shigella spp. and other intestinal pathogens have been developed (7–11). Multiplex PCR is one of molecular methods that have been used frequently in many studies because of rapidity and its capability for simultaneous detection of several microorganisms in a single sample (12).
The genus of Shigella has four species that are able to cause severe disease in humans. S. sonnei is the major cause of shigellosis in industrialized countries. Otherwise S. flexneri is the most prevalent Shigella serotype in developing countries (13–15). S. dysenteriae is usually the cause of epidemics of dysentery is detected mostly in South Asia and sub-Saharian Africa and S. boydii has been less frequently reported worldwide compared to other Shigella serogroups (16). Of four species, three including S. sonnei, S. flexneri and S. boydii are common species in Iran (17–20).
This study aimed to develop a Multiplex-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of three most common Shigella species in Iran.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial species
Clinical Shigella isolates were recovered from patients with Shigella infections admitted to several hospitals including Children Medical Center, Emam Khomeini and Baqiatallah hospitals in Tehran, Iran, during 2008–2010. Bacterial positive controls were also used to check the specificity of the assay (Table 1). Subsequently, identification and confirmation of the reference and clinical strains were carried out by culture, biochemical and serological testing.
Table 1:
Primers used in this study
Primers | Sequence | Locus | Species | Band size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|---|
GF GR |
TCCGTCATGCTGGATGAACGATGT ACAGTTCAGGATTGCCCGAGACACA |
NC_004337: 559294-559452 NC_004741: 555187-555345 NC_007384: 759977-760135 NC_007613: 642360-642518 NC_008258: 602392-602550 NC_010658: 652993-653151 |
Shigella spp. | 159 |
BF BR |
TCTGATGTCACTCTTTGCGAGT GAATCCGGTACCCGTAAGGT |
NC_007613: 1360607-1360854 NC_010658: 1782921-1783168 |
S. boydii | 248 |
SF SR |
AATGCCGTAAGGAATGCAAG CTT-GAAGGAGATTCGCTGCT | NC_007384: 1665725-1666227 | S. sonnei | 503 |
FF FR |
ACCGGTTATGAACCCTCCAT TGGTGCTTGTTGAGCAACTC |
NC_004337: 1412593-1412906 NC_004741: 1898025-1898338 NC_008258: 1883992-1884305 |
S. flexneri | 314 |
Bacterial DNA extraction
Bacterial strains were grown on LB broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. The culture of each Shigella isolate was centrifuged at 6000 RPM for 10 min. Genomic DNA of the Shigella strains was extracted using a DNA extraction Kit (Cat. No. 11 814 770 001, Roche, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Genomic PCR targets and primers
We designed four sets of primers to amplify the target genes of Shigella spp. (Putative Integrase) and of three Shigella species including S. sonnei (Putative Restriction Endonuclease), S. flexneri (Putative Bacteriophage Protein) and S. boydii (Conserved Hypothetical Protein). The list of the primers and their sequences are presented in Table 2.
Table 2:
Shigella species and non- Shigella microorganisms included in this stud
Bacterial strains | Shigella spp. PCR results | S. flexneri specific-PCR results | S. boydii specific-PCR results | S. sonnei specific-PCR results | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shigella spp. | |||||
S. flexneri | + | + | − | − | ATTC9290 |
S. boydii | + | − | + | − | ATTC 9207 |
S. sonnei | + | − | − | + | ATTC12022 |
S. sonnei | + | − | − | + | 17 clinical isolates |
S. dysenteriae | + | − | − | − | 3 clinical isolates |
S. flexneri | + | + | − | − | 6 clinical isolates |
S. boydii | + | − | + | − | 4 clinical isolates |
Non- Shigella organisms | |||||
Salmonella enteritidis | − | − | − | − | ATCC 4931 |
Salmonella typhimurium | − | − | − | − | ATCC 14028 |
Campylobacter jejuni | − | − | − | − | ATCC 33560 |
Escherichia coli | − | − | − | − | ATCC 25922 |
Vibrio cholerae | − | − | − | − | PTCC 1611 |
Escherichia coli | − | − | − | − | ATCC 35150 |
To avoid cross-reactivity with Shigella related bacteria and within each other Shigella species, genus and species-specific regions of the Shigella genome were considered to design the primers, respectively.
PCR assay
First, a standard PCR assay was performed using standard (Shigella and non Shigella strains) and 30 clinical strains (17 S. sonnei, 6 S. flexneri, 4 S. boydii and 3 S. dysenteriae). The PCR was carried out using a total volume of 25 μL containing 1× PCR buffer, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase, 200 μM dNTP, 0.5 μM of each primers and 2.5 μL of DNA template. The PCR condition consisted of 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 60 s at 95 °C of denaturing temperature, 60s at 60 °C of annealing temperature, and 1 min at 72 °C of extension temperature. At the end of the 30 cycles, a final extension of 10 minutes at 72 °C was used.
Each multiplex PCR mixture in was prepared using a total volume of 25 μL containing 0.5 μM of each primer (four pairs), 2, 5 μL PCR buffer 10X, 2 U Taq DNA polymerase, 1 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs and 1 μL DNA template. The multiplex PCR was carried out through 30 cycles following a pre-heat step at 95 °C for 5min. Each cycle consisted of denaturation at 95 °C for 60 s, annealing at 60 °C for 1min, and extension at 72 °C for 1min. After the 30 cycles, samples were maintained at 72°C for 10 min. Sterile distilled water was included in each PCR assay as a negative control. The amplified DNA was separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized by UV transillumination.
Results
The Shigella genus specific PCR produced the expected amplified DNA band in all Shigella species strains tested. Figure 1 shows the specific band of 159 bp obtained from standard and clinical isolates belonging to four Shigella species. Any positive reaction with non Shigella strains including Salmonella and Escherichia coli was detected. Standard PCR assays also produced the expected fragments of 248 bp, 503 bp, and 314 bp, for S. boydii, S. sonnei and S. flexneri, respectively. While S. dysenteriae was used as negative control for detection assay of three pathogenic Shigella species, any DNA band was not amplified using specific Shigella species primers (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1:
Detection of specific Shigella species genes by PCR : lane 1, S. flexneri ATTC9290 (314bp); lane 2, clinical isolate of S. flexneri(314bp); lane 3, clinical isolate of S. boydii (248bp); lane 4, S. sonnei ATTC12022 (503bp); lane 5 clinical Shigella spp. (S. dysenteriae) (159bp); lane 6 100bp ladder; lanes 7 and 8, non Shigella isolates including Salmonella enteritidis and E. coli respectively
As shown in Table 2, the standard PCR showed the same results on 30 clinical Shigella isolates. These isolates were recently recovered from pediatric patients in Tehran, Iran.
Multiplex PCR was successfully optimized for rapid and simultaneous detection of three pathogenic Shigella species.
Multiplex PCR was able produced the expected DNA bands for standard and clinical isolates of S. boydii, S. sonnei and S. flexneri in a single reaction. No non specific amplification products were observed with S. dysenteriae (as negative control) and non Shigella strains. Figure 2 shows the specific amplified bands obtained by multiplex PCR on the three pathogenic Shigella species.
Fig. 2:
Multiplex PCR : lane 1 clinical species, lane 2 standard species and lane 3 100bp ladder. Shigella spp; 159bp, S. sonnei; 503bp, S. flexneri; 314bp, and S. boydii; 247bp
Discussion
A specific PCR using Putative Integrase locus was evaluated for the rapid and specific detection of Shigella species. The results showed that this locus is an appropriate target for this purpose. This locus is conserved in all Shigella species and has not been studied previously.
A new multiplex PCR was also designed using four sets of primers to identify common Shigella species in our country. Accordingly, the designed method was successfully able to detect S. boydii, S. flexneri and S. sonnei. No nonspecific amplification was observed, confirming that this assay is specific for detection of these three most common pathogenic Shigella species in Iran.
Several previous studies have used standard PCR for rapid detection of bacterial pathogens such as Shigella species. However, multiplex PCR deserves special interest because of the possibility to rapid and simultaneous detection and identification of several target genes in a single reaction (21–26). Optimization of annealing temperature is very important in this technique. The annealing temperature of 60°C proved to be optimal for detection and differentiation of the three Shigella species under study. Analysis of quality assessment results of standard strains in combination with clinical samples indicated that the multiplex PCR was reliable and suitable method for the simultaneous detection of different Shigella strains. PCR results obtained from the clinical samples were consistent with results from the standard strains.
Previously some researchers have applied the multiplex PCR for rapid detection and differentiation of prevalent Shigella species. The primers used in many studies have been designed for detection of plasmid genes encoding virulence factors (27). Vantarakis et al. designed a multiplex PCR using two sets of primers which targeted invA and virA genes for simultaneous detection of Salmonella s and Shigella specie, respectively (28). Aranda et al. evaluated two multiplex PCR assays for simultaneous detection of typical and atypical E. coli pathovars and Shigella species. (29). Their results showed that the multiplex PCR was a potentially valuable tool for rapid diagnosis of Shigella species and E. coli pathovars.
Thong et al. designed a multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of chromosomal-and plasmid-encoded virulence genes (set1A, set1B, ial and ipaH) in Shigella species. Unlike our study, the limitation of their Multiplex PCR assay was its inability to differentiate Shigella species (30). This problem may be resulted from losing of virulence genes in some strains owing to plasmid-curing or hot spot regions for deletion (31).
The described assay showed to be specific for detection and differentiation of the three Shigella species tested. No false positive and negative results occurred during the assay indicating that target loci used in the study were specific for Shigella species. One of Shigella Multiplex PCR limitations is its inability to discriminate Shigella isolates from EIEC (32). However, this problem was resolved by using specific primers so we found any cross reaction with EIEC, bioinformatically.
Our results also showed that the multiplex PCR using four primers sets was able to detect Shigella species and to differentiate three species of Shigella simultaneously in a single reaction by the combinations of the different-size amplicons without any cross-reactivity.
Conclusion
The method presented here showed a good specificity and proved to be able to offer an important diagnostic tool for the rapid and simultaneous detection of the three most prevalent species of Shigella in Iran.
Ethical Considerations
All ethical issues including plagiarism, Informed Consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc. have been completely observed by the author.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Haghi-Ashtiani and Mrs. Mina Abedini from Microbiology Laboratory of the Children’s Medical Center for their kind cooperation. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Reference
- 1. Kotloff KL, Winickoff JP, Ivanoff B, Clemens JD, Swerdlow DL, Sansonetti PJ, et al. ( 1999). Global burden of Shigella infections: implications for vaccine development and implementation of control strategies. Bull World Health Organ, 77: 651– 66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ranjbar R, Pourshafie MR, Soltan-Dallal MM, Rahbar M, Farshad S, Parvaneh N, et al. ( 2010). Fatality due to shigellosis with special reference to molecular analysis of Shigella sonnei strains isolated from the fatal cases. Ira J Clin Infect Dis, 5: 36 – 39. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hosseini MJ, Ranjbar R, Ghasemi H, Jalalian HR. ( 2007). The prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Shigella spp. recovered from patients admitted to Bouali Hospital, Tehran, Iran during 1999 – 2000. Pak J Biol Sci, 10: 2778 – 2780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ranjbar R, Soltan-Dallal MM, Pourshafie MR. ( 2009). Antibiotic resistance among Shigella serogroups isolated in Tehran, Iran (2002–2004). J Infect Dev Ctries, 3: 647– 648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Vu DT, Sethabutr O, Von SL, Tran VT, Do GC, Bui TC, et al. ( 2004). Detection of Shigella by a PCR assay targeting the ipaH gene suggests increased prevalence of shigellosis in Nha Trang, Vietnam. J Clin Microbiol, 42: 2031– 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Villalobo E, Torres A. ( 1998). PCR for detection of Shigella spp. in mayonnaise. Appl Environ Microbiol, 64: 1242- [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wang L, Li Y, Mustaphai A. ( 2007). Rapid and simultaneous quantitation of Escherichia coli 0157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella in ground beef by multiplex real-time PCR and immunomagnetic separation. J Food Prot, 70: 1366– 72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Vantarakis A, Komninou G, Venieri D, Papapetropoulou M. ( 2000). Development of a multiplex PCR detection of Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp. in mussels. Lett Appl Microbiol, 31: 105– 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brandal LT, Lindstedt BA, Aas L, Stavnes TL, Lassen J, Kapperud G. ( 2007). Octaplex PCR and fluorescence-based capillary electrophoresis for identification of human diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. J Microbiol Methods, 68: 331– 41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lindqvist R. ( 1999). Detection of Shigella spp. in food with a nested PCR method-sensitivity and performance compared with a conventional culture method. J Appl Microbiol, 86: 971– 8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Dutta S, Chatterjee A, Dutta P, Rajendran K, Roy S, Pramanik KC, et al. ( 2001). Sensitivity and performance characteristics of a direct PCR with stool samples in comparison to conventional techniques for diagnosis of Shigella and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli infection in children with acute diarrhoea in Calcutta, India. J Med Microbiol, 50: 667– 74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Tarr CL, Patel JS, Puhr ND, Sowers EG, Bopp CA, Strockbine NA. ( 2007). Identification of Vibrio isolates by a multiplex PCR assay and rpoB sequence determination. J Clin Microbiol, 45: 134– 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Filliol-Toutain I, Chiou CS, Mammina C, Gerner-Smidt P, Thong KL, Phung DC, et al. ( 2011). Global distribution of Shigella sonnei clones. Emerg Infect Dis, 17: 1910– 1912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Soltan-Dallal MM, Ranjbar R, Pourshafie MR. ( 2011). The study of antimicrobial resistance among Shigella flexneri strains isolated in Tehran, Iran. J Pediatr Infect Dis, 6 : 125– 129. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ranjbar R, Hosseini MJ, Kaffashian AR, Farshad S. ( 2010). An outbreak of shigellosis due to Shigella flexneri serotype 3a in a prison in Iran. Arch Iran Med, 13: 413– 416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ranjbar R, Mammina C, Pourshafie MR, Soltan-Dallal MM. ( 2008). Characterization of endemic Shigella boydii strains isolated in Iran by serotyping, antimicrobial resistance, plasmid profile, ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. BMC Res Notes, 1: 74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ranjbar R, Soltan Dallal MM, Talebi M, Pourshafie MR. ( 2008). Increased isolation and characterization of Shigella sonnei obtained from hospitalized children in Tehran, Iran. J Health Popul Nutr, 26: 426– 430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ranjbar R, Aleo A, Giammanco GM, Dionisi AM, Sadeghifard N, Mammina C. ( 2007). Genetic relatedness among isolates of Shigella sonnei carrying class 2 integrons in Tehran, Iran, 2002 – 2003. BMC Infect Dis, 22: 62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ranjbar R, Ghazi FM, Farshad S, Giammanco GM, Aleo A, Owlia P, Jonaidi N, Sadeghifard N, Mammina C. ( 2013). The occurrence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Shigella spp. in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Microbiol, 5: 108– 112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ranjbar R, Mirsaeed Ghazi F. ( 2013). Antibiotic sensitivity patterns and molecular typing of Shigella sonnei strains using ERIC-PCR. Iran J Public Health, 42: 1151– 1157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhao J, Kang L, Hu R, Gao S, Xin W, Chen W, et al. ( 2013). Rapid Oligonucleotide Suspension Array-Based Multiplex Detection of Bacterial Pathogens. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 10: 896– 903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Fazzeli H, Arabestani MR, Esfahani BN, Khorvash F, Pourshafie MR, Moghim S, et al. ( 2013). A new multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for the identification a panel of bacteria involved in bacteremia. Adv Biomed Res, 6; 2: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bhattacharyya N, Hou A. ( 2013). A pentaplex PCR assay for detection and characterization of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. Lett Appl Microbiol, 57: 233– 40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wei B, Cha SY, Kang M, Park IJ, Moon OK, Park CK, et al. ( 2013). Development and application of a multiplex PCR assay for rapid detection of 4 major bacterial pathogens in ducks. Poult Sci, 92: 1164– 70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kumar A, Grover S, Kumar Batish V. ( 2013). Application of multiplex PCR assay based on uidR and fliCH7 genes for detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in milk. J Gen Appl Microbiol, 59: 11– 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Dixit S, Bhandari GP, Karmacharya DB, Shrestha S, Manandhar S, Maskey MK. ( 2011). Molecular screening of major bacterial enteropathogens in human stool samples from diarrhoeal outbreak sites. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 9: 181– 5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Johnson TJ, Nolan LK. ( 2009). Pathogenomics of the virulence plasmids of Escherichia coli. Microbiol Mol.Biol.Rev, 73: 750– 774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Vantarakis A, Komninou G, Venieri D, Papapetropoulou M. ( 2000). Development of a multiplex PCR detection of Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp. in mussels. Lett Appl Microbiol, 31: 105– 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Aranda KR, Fagundes-Neto U, Scaletsky IC. ( 2004). Evaluation of multiplex PCRs for diagnosis of infection with diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. J Clin Microbiol, 42: 5849– 53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Thong KL, Hoe SL, Puthucheary SD, Yasin R. ( 2005). Detection of virulence genes in Malaysian Shigella species by multiplex PCR assay. BMC Infect Dis, 14; 5: 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sasakawa C., Kamata K., Sakai T., Murayama S. Y., Makino S., Yoshikawa M. ( 1986). Molecular alteration of the 140-megadalton plasmid associated with loss of virulence and Congo red binding activity in Shigella flexneri. Infect Immun., 51: 470– 475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Binet R, Deer DM, Uhlfelder SJ. ( 2014). Rapid detection of Shigella and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli in produce enrichments by a conventional multiplex PCR assay. Food Microbiol; 40: 48– 54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]