Skip to main content
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2015 Jun 29;2015:354517. doi: 10.1155/2015/354517

Human miR-221/222 in Physiological and Atherosclerotic Vascular Remodeling

Dmitry A Chistiakov 1,2, Igor A Sobenin 3,4, Alexander N Orekhov 3,5, Yuri V Bobryshev 3,6,7,*
PMCID: PMC4499635  PMID: 26221589

Abstract

A cluster of miR-221/222 is a key player in vascular biology through exhibiting its effects on vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and endothelial cells (ECs). These miRNAs contribute to vascular remodeling, an adaptive process involving phenotypic and behavioral changes in vascular cells in response to vascular injury. In proliferative vascular diseases such as atherosclerosis, pathological vascular remodeling plays a prominent role. The miR-221/222 cluster controls development and differentiation of ECs but inhibits their proangiogenic activation, proliferation, and migration. miR-221/222 are primarily implicated in maintaining endothelial integrity and supporting quiescent EC phenotype. Vascular expression of miR-221/222 is upregulated in initial atherogenic stages causing inhibition of angiogenic recruitment of ECs and increasing endothelial dysfunction and EC apoptosis. In contrast, these miRNAs stimulate VSMCs and switching from the VSMC “contractile” phenotype to the “synthetic” phenotype associated with induction of proliferation and motility. In atherosclerotic vessels, miR-221/222 drive neointima formation. Both miRNAs contribute to atherogenic calcification of VSMCs. In advanced plaques, chronic inflammation downregulates miR-221/222 expression in ECs that in turn could activate intralesion neoangiogenesis. In addition, both miRNAs could contribute to cardiovascular pathology through their effects on fat and glucose metabolism in nonvascular tissues such as adipose tissue, liver, and skeletal muscles.

1. Introduction

In the body, the vascular system fulfills a variety of vital functions. Blood vessels transport nutrients and oxygen to every cell and take off wastes and carbon dioxide. The vasculature is involved in maintaining body temperature, pH, and mineral homeostasis. Blood and lymph vessels transfer immune cells essential for host defense against various pathogens. The vascular network is composed of differently sized vessels like the micro-, small, medium, and large vessels.

The vascular tissues include several types of cells including endothelial cells (ECs), vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), pericytes, fibroblasts, resident macrophages, resident mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and progenitors, and connective tissues. The classical three-layer structure of the vascular wall involves the intima, media, and adventitia flanked with the elastic laminae [1].

The vessel wall is adopted for various functional requirements that could be changed depending on each segment of the circulatory system. For example, aorta and large arteries are enriched with elastic fibers in order to support sufficient flow and pressure for delivery of blood components to the extreme peripheral tissues [2]. The circulatory network is a dynamic system that constitutively develops and matures to be better adapted to the rapid changes in microenvironmental conditions. Physiological processes associated with structural modifications in the vascular wall and related to vascular developmental changes during embryogenesis and adaptive responses such as neovascularization are termed vascular remodeling [3, 4].

In embryogenesis, vascular remodeling is an essential mechanism that supports the development and formation of the mature vascular network. In humans, vascular remodeling starts at day 21 when the immature heart begins to beat pushing blood through the early vasculature [5]. Indeed, biomechanical and hemodynamic forces and characteristics such as shear stress, cylinder stress, pressure, velocity, and flow become applicable to the developing vessels and induce signaling cascades that contribute to angiogenesis, vessel sprouting, vascular branching, hierarchy, maturation, and arterial-vein identity [6]. These signaling pathways are activated in ECs and VSMCs through the mechanism of mechanotransduction associated with upregulation and downregulation of certain genes involved in vasculogenesis, cell differentiation, proliferation, migration, differentiation, adhesion, and cell-matrix interactions [7].

To date, mouse is a leading model system for studying the physical and molecular regulation of vascular development and embryogenic vascular remodeling. In cultured mouse ECs, mechanical shear stress was shown to activate a signal transduction complex composed of three receptors such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)/fetal liver kinase 1 (FLK1), vascular endothelial cell cadherin (VE-cadherin), and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM1). As a result, cells realigned parallel to the direction of flow become mechanosensitive [8]. Direct transmission of mechanical force occurs through PECAM1 to VE-cadherin that acts as an adaptor protein activating Flk1 and catalyzing the activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI3K) signaling cascade [9]. This leads to the induction of a panel of transcription factors including Krüppel-like factors- (KLF-) 4 and 6 and T cell acute lymphocytic leukemia 1 (Tal1) essential for both hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis [10, 11].

Vascular remodeling is a crucial mechanism of the routine endothelial replacement and repair of damaged vessel wall in order to maintain vascular integrity and function and prevent thrombosis [12]. This process involves many cell types including resident and nonresident stem and nonstem cells. In arterial injury, bone mesenchymal stem cells were shown to have a capacity to differentiate to neo-ECs and contribute to reendothelization [13]. The reendothelization is controlled by bone-marrow derived transcription factor KLF-10 [14]. Medial VSMCs and adventitial fibroblasts undergo phenotypic changes associated with induction of proliferation, migration, and differentiation and enhanced production of extracellular matrix proteins and adhesion molecules and release of reactive oxygen species, chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that, collectively, affect medial VSMC contractility and growth directly and that stimulate recruitment and retention of circulating inflammatory and progenitor cells to the vascular wall [15]. Pericytes characterized with significant phenotypic plasticity and ability to transdifferentiate to several vascular cell types such as VSMCs, fibroblasts, and macrophages also contribute to vascular repair [16].

However, vascular remodeling can occur as a maladaptive response against vessel injury. In that case, the remodeling could be associated with various vascular abnormalities such as endothelial dysfunction, hypertrophy, or fibrosis and be a part of a pathophysiological mechanism in the development of hypertension, thrombosis, restenosis, cardiomyopathy, atherosclerosis, and other cardiovascular disease.

Atherosclerosis is characterized with marked structural alterations in the arterial wall induced by the subendothelial accumulation of modified lipoproteins followed by the chronic inflammatory response [17, 18]. Vascular remodeling results from a close interplay of changes in the vascular tone and structure. An important concept for arterial remodeling (so-called Glagov's phenomenon) considers that arteries remodel to maintain constant flow despite increases in atherosclerotic lesion mass [19]. Indeed, atherosclerotic vascular remodeling is an adaptive response of the circulatory system to the growth of atherosclerotic plaques [3].

Atherogenic vascular remodeling involves various cell types, with a prominent role of ECs and VSMCs. Inflammatory monocytes and macrophages recruited in the atherosclerotic plaque contribute to the atherosclerosis-associated changes in the vascular wall via stimulation of ECs and VSMCs [20]. Briefly, inflammatory stimuli and changes in hemodynamic characteristics of blood flow in atherosclerotic vessels such as elevated blood pressure and increased shear stress led to the proinflammatory activation of arterial endothelium and advanced apoptosis of ECs, with subsequent denudation of the arterial wall and increased risk of thrombosis [21, 22]. In contrast, VSMCs lack their quiescence and “contractile” phenotype and acquire capacity to proliferate and migrate. This leads to the neointimal formation associated with intimal thickening and ectopic calcification of atherosclerotic arteries [23]. Vascular remodeling is accompanied with upregulation or downregulation of various molecular subsets including microRNAs (miRNAs).

Within the last decade, a research focused on evaluation of a role of miRNAs in physiological and pathological structural changes in vessels becoming more and more intensive [24]. This especially concerns studying involvement of tissue-specific (e.g., vascular or heart) miRNAs that normally control embryonic angiogenesis, cardiogenesis, and/or vascular repair. Human miRNA- (miR-) 221 and its paralogue miR-222 show notable activities in the vascular network by influencing angiogenic properties of ECs [25] and phenotypic changes in VSMCs [26]. miR-221/222 have been found to regulate essential physiological vascular processes such as angiogenesis [27], neointimal hyperplasia [28], vessel wound healing [29], and vascular aging [30]. Furthermore, this miRNA is involved in a variety of vascular-related pathological mechanisms including tumor angiogenesis [31], atherosclerotic inflammation and vascular remodeling [32], fibrosis [33], vascular calcification [34], cardiac hypertrophy [35], angiotensin II dependent hypertension [36], and diabetic hyperglycemia-induced endothelial dysfunction [37]. In this review, we provide the information about the contribution of miR-221/222 to vascular remodeling in normal and atherosclerotic vessels.

2. Biogenesis and mRNA-Silencing Function of miR-221/222

In human DNA, the miR-221/222 gene cluster is located on chromosome Xp11.3 [38]. The miR-221 and miR-222 genes are separated by a distance of 726 bp (Figure 1). Nucleotide sequences of both genes share high similarity to each other. In fact, the genes are paralogues arisen from the duplication of the ancestral gene. They are transcribed as a single long noncoding RNA precursor with RNA polymerase II [39]. The promoter region contains two canonical TATA boxes located on 550 and 190 base pairs (bp) upstream of pre-miR-222. Three poly(A) signals are located downstream of pre-miR-221. The expression of the miR-221/222 gene cluster is positively regulated by angiotensin II [36] and downregulated by a repressive complex formed by estrogen receptor α and two nuclear receptor corepressors NCOR1 and NCOR2 [38].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Biogenesis of human miR-221/222. miRNA-encoding genes are shown in red boxes. In the common promoter, TATA boxes are marked by green triangles. Poly(A) signals are displayed with blue arrows. Numbers designate the distance between the regulatory transcription elements (in bp) and the length of each miRNA gene and intergenic spacer. The sequence of a mature miRNA duplex is presented in red color. Ago2: Argonaute-2; DGCR8: DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8; GW182: glycine-tryptophan protein of 182 kDa; MTDH: metadherin; PACT: protein kinase R-activating protein; Ran-GTP: GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran; SND1: staphylococcal nuclease domain-containing protein 1; TRBP: TAR RNA-binding protein.

In the nucleus, the common pri-miR-221/222 transcript then is spliced and split by the “microprocessor” complex Drosha/DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8 (DGSR8) [40] with formation of the individual pre-miR-221 and pre-miR-222 precursors that both have the length of 110 nucleotides (nt). Pre-miRNAs are transferred to the cytoplasm by the nuclear transporter exportin-5, a Ran-GTP RNA-binding protein [41], where Dicer cleaves the miRNA precursors to mature miRNA duplexes. Each miRNA duplex is stabilized with the heterotrimeric complex Argonaute-2 (Ago2)/TAR RNA-binding protein (TRBP)/protein kinase R-activating protein (PACT) [42] that is a core of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Double stranded miRNA is generally a transient imperfect duplex molecule consisting of a passenger strand and a mature miRNA strand (also referred to as guide strand) [43]. The duplex was then cleaved by Dicer with the formation of a functional single stranded mature miRNA bound to the RISC complex (miRISC). During miRISC complex formation, several additional proteins are recruited including GW182 (glycine-tryptophan protein of 182 kDa), MTDH (metadherin), and SND1 (staphylococcal nuclease domain-containing protein 1). GW182 contains two repression domains, which trigger translational repression with mild effect on mRNA decay, and multiple glycine/tryptophan repeats essential for formation and maintaining stability of the multiprotein RISC complex [44]. SND1 is a coactivator of several eukaryotic transcription factors and a component of ribonucleoprotein complexes such as spliceosome and RISC complex that increases their functional efficiency and kinetics [45]. In the RISC complex, MTDH acts as a scaffold protein possessing RNA-binding properties [46]. Generally, only one strand is incorporated into the miRISC selected on the basis of its thermodynamic instability [47]. Indeed, maturation of the pre-miR-221 results in the formation of either mature 23nt-long miR-221-5p or miR-221-3p. For miR-222, generating two mature 21nt-long miRNAs (miR-222-5p and miR-222-3p) is possible (Figure 1).

Following assembly of the miRISC complexes, there is increasing evidence that miRNAs exert their posttranscriptional regulatory functions in the context of processing bodies (P-bodies). P-bodies are distinct compartments (foci) in the cytoplasm involved in RNA degradation and turnover [48]. Furthermore, P-bodies were recognized to serve as the functional site of miRNA-mediated gene silencing since duplex miRNA-containing RISC complexes were found in these compartments [49]. The miRISC complex binds target mRNA through Watson-Crick base pairing between the guide strand and the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the target [50]. The precision of target recognition heavily depends on base pairing between the seeds (nt 2–8 at the 5′ end) of the miRNA guide [51].

Extensive base pairing between the miRNA guide and mRNA target induces the degradation of mRNA target through Ago2-mediated cleavage and deadenylation that is dependent on the activity of the complex comprised by Pop2 (pyrin domain containing 2), Ccr4 (mRNA deadenylase), and Not1 (CCR-NOT transcription complex subunit 1) [52]. Deadenylated mRNA is then degraded with exoribonuclease Xrn1p and decapped with mRNA-decapping (Dcp) enzymes [53]. In the cytoplasm, mRNAs actively translated by polyribosomes are targeted by miRISC complexes to suppress translation [54]. These mRNAs could then be delivered to P-bodies for degradation or storage in order to preserve a pool of transcripts whose translation is rate-limited for cell growth [55].

3. miR-221/222 Function in Physiological Vascular Remodeling

3.1. Antiangiogenic Activity of the miR-221/222 Cluster in Vascular ECs

Inside the vascular tissue, ECs are responsible for critical functions [56, 57]. They provide inner lining to the blood vessels and the heart, secrete a variety of bioactive molecules to affect the local environment of the cells, and transfer the molecules from the blood to the interstitial fluid. During the developmental stages and in diseases, ECs tightly cooperate with the nearby muscles in mediating angiogenesis and neovascularization. Overall, ECs contribute to the maintenance and growth of normal tissues [56, 57].

It was shown that human blood cord-derived CD34+ HPCs, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) [58], and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) [59] as well as quiescent ECs [60] highly express miR-221/222 thereby suggesting a critical role of this miRNA cluster in regulating development and function of the vascular endothelium. However, in vascular ECs, the role of miR-221/222 greatly varies depending on the developmental stages and microenvironment.

ECs were shown to express both SCF and its receptor c-kit [6063]. Indeed c-kit-dependent angiogenic properties of ECs are targeted by miR-221/222 [25]. miR-221/222 were shown to be transcribed in c-kit-positive HUVECs suggesting a coordinated transcriptional regulation. miR221/222 downregulates c-kit on the posttranslational level since reduction in c-kit protein levels but not in mRNA levels was observed in HUVECs transfected with miR221/222 [25].

In embryonic ECs, miR-221 was shown to drive angiogenesis and especially proliferation and migration of tip ECs in sprouting neovessels [64]. In miR-221-deficient zebrafish embryos, proliferation of ECs is blocked [65]. miR-221 supports embryonic angiogenesis through targeting two key regulatory molecules, CDKN1B and PI3KR1. CDKN1B is a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p27Kip1 that negatively regulates cell growth and prevents proliferation by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases [66]. PI3KR1 is the p85-regulatory subunit α of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) complex, an essential component of PI3K signaling that is crucial for vascular development [67]. PI3KR1 inhibits the PI3K p110 catalytic subunits but is also necessary for activity of the membrane-bound enzyme and stimulation by a receptor tyrosine kinase [68]. miR221 is likely to alter an appropriate balance in regulatory and catalytic subunits of PI3K that may indeed affect the receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated activation of PI3K and local PI3K activity in separate subcellular compartments such as growing filopodia of tip embryonic ECs.

miR-221 directs proliferation of embryonic ECs through vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C)/Fms-related tyrosine kinase 4 (Flt4) signaling [64] that is modulated by PI3K3R1 that stimulates interaction of PI3K with VEGF-C-activated Flt4 (VEGFR3), a receptor for VEGF-C and VEGF-D [69]. Activation of notch signaling in stalk ECs was shown to inhibit both Flt4 and miR-221 that leads to increase in CDKN1B levels and reducing proliferation [64]. Specification of hemogenic ECs from the primordial endothelium is controlled by c-kit, notch signaling, and p27Kip1-dependent cell cycle control [66]. miR-221 is involved in crosstalk with all signaling components essential phenotypic definition of hemogenic ECs and therefore plays a key role at early differentiation stages of the vascular endothelial development.

In EPCs, miR-221 was found to suppress serine/threonine-protein kinase PAK1 [70] (Figure 2). PAK1 belongs to the family of p21Waf1/Cip1-activated kinases and serves as a target for small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac [71]. EPCs are known to play an essential role in vascular repair and maintenance of vascular homeostasis through reendothelialization and neovascularization. EPCs transfected with miR-221/miR-222 loose capacity to do wound healing and tube formation [63].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of miR-221/222 on vascular endothelium and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in atherosclerotic vascular remodeling. In arterial endothelial cells (ECs), expression of miR-221/222 could be upregulated by angiotensin II and shear stress. miR-221/222 are able to positively regulate expression through suppression of RAS p21 protein activator 1 (RASA1), an inhibitor of CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) that drives angiotensin II induced expression of both miRNAs. Increased levels of miR-221/222 suppress angiogenic activation of quiescent terminally differentiated ECs through inhibiting endothelial proliferation and migration. Proliferation is suppressed via negative regulatory effects of the miR-221/222 cluster on several key genes such as cyclin-dependent kinase cell cycle regulators p21Cip1 and p27Kip1, transcription factors Ets1 and Ets2, signal transducer and activator STAT5a, and receptor for mast/stem cell growth factor c-kit. Notably, miR-221/222 downregulate expression of endothelial NO-synthase (eNOS) that lead to lowered production of nitric oxide (NO), an important modulator of function and proliferation of vascular ECs. Decreased NO production contributes to endothelial dysfunction and promotes EC senescence. miR-221/222 could downregulate p21Cip1 either directly or through blocking of ZEB2 (zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2), which represses translation of mesenchyme homeobox 2 (MEOX2 or GAX), a transcriptional activator of p21Cip1. The miR-221/222 cluster attenuates EC migration by suppressing endothelial production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and several key adhesion modulators such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), integrin-β3, and serine/threonine-protein kinase PAK-1. The miR-221/222 cluster could probably diminish endothelial expression of adiponectin receptor AdipoR1. Adiponectin is produced by adipocytes and plays protective role for ECs by preventing endothelial dysfunction. In obesity, miR-221/222 are upregulated in the adipose tissue causing activation of lipid catabolism (lipolysis and fatty cell oxidation) through inhibition of Ets1, a transcription factor that controls expression of fatty acid synthase and other lipid-synthesizing enzymes. As a result, adipocytes release increased amounts of free fatty acids to blood that inhibit insulin signaling in liver and skeletal muscle inducing peripheral insulin resistance. Insulin resistance contributes to endothelial dysfunction. In VSMCs, expression of miR-221/222 is stimulated by angiotensin II and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) that is secreted by activated platelets and ECs in response to vascular injury. Upregulation of these miRNAs supports proliferation and increase mobility of VSMCs. In VSMCs, miR-221/222 inhibit several regulatory factors such as those of p21Cip1, p27Kip1, p57Kip2, c-kit, and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) that are crucial for differentiation and establishment of the contractile phenotype of VSMCs. p57Kip2 and c-kit activate MyoD and myocardin, two key transcription factors involved in myogenesis. Indeed, miR-221/222-dependent downregulation of expression of SMC-specific contractile proteins causes VSMC dedifferentiation and switch from the “contractile” to “synthetic” phenotype. By suppressing PTEN, miR-221/222 induce expression of several proinflammatory chemokines such as monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α) that attract proinflammatory lymphocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages to the inflamed site, for example, to the atherosclerotic plaque. In addition, miR-221/222 downregulate PUMA (p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis), a critical apoptotic inducer thereby preventing apoptosis of VSMCs. Finally, dedifferentiated VSMCs become involved in neointima formation, an essential stage in atherosclerosis-associated remodeling of the arterial wall.

PAK1 is involved in cytoskeleton reorganization and activation of EPC motility and proliferation is response to vascular injury [72, 73]. PAK1 was found to activate c-Raf/MEK/ERK signaling by phosphorylation of MEK on serine 298 [74] and RAF on serine 338 [75]. Therefore, miR-221-mediated PAK1 targeting attenuates proliferation of EPCs and impairs their function through downregulating c-Raf/MEK/ERK pathway thereby displaying antiangiogenic properties and contributing to maintenance of quiescent phenotype [70]. Interestingly, biologically active molecular components of garlic extract such as diallyl disulfide and diallyl trisulfide inhibit miR-221 expression and restore angiogenic properties of EPCs via derepressing c-kit and activating signaling protein kinases Akt and ERK 1/2 [58].

In mature human ECs, miR221/222 exhibit strictly antiangiogenic properties mediated by many targets. This mRNA cluster could display the antiangiogenic effects through inhibiting c-kit, transcription factors Ets1, Ets2 [25], zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2) [76], signal activator and transducer 5A (STAT5a) [60], and endothelial NO-synthase (eNOS) [77, 78]. Interestingly, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes virus (KSHV) oncogenes such as latent nuclear antigen (LANA) and kaposin B were shown to activate EC motility and proliferation essential for tumor neoangiogenesis by derepressing Ets1 and Ets2 [79, 80] through direct transcriptional suppression of miR-221/222. Ets1, a prototype of the Ets family of transcription factors, supports EC-mediated angiogenesis by inducing expression of MMPs and integrin-β3 in ECs [81] (Figure 2). eNOS, which plays a crucial role in the regulation of vascular function, contributes to angiogenesis by production of nitric oxide, a vasoactive molecule, in response to multiple stimuli [82].

In epithelial tissues, ZEB2 known as a regulator of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) acts as a stimulator of cell proliferation and mobility [83]. ZEB2 mRNA is directly targeted by miR-221 at the consensus site located at the 3′UTR [76]. On the other hand, ZEB2 acts as a translational repressor of mesenchyme homeobox 2 (MEOX2 or GAX), a transcriptional factor that is expressed in quiescent vascular ECs and inhibits EC transition to the angiogenic phenotype in response to proangiogenic growth factors [84]. In ECs, MEOX2 activates expression of p21WAF1/CIP1 by binding directly to its promoter and enhancer [85] that causes cell cycle arrest in G0/G1. MEOX2 is also able to suppress EC activation through the downregulation of activity of the nuclear factor NF-κB [86].

STAT5A was shown to mediate angiogenic activation of ECs through several mechanisms including Src/Jak2-dependent stimulatory signals from fibroblast growth factors FGF2 and FGF8b [87]. Prolactin family members such as proliferin and prolactin could mediate proangiogenic properties of the FGF/STAT5A activating axis through autocrine mechanism [88]. FGF2-mediated activation leads to the recruitment of STAT1 and STAT5A and to a lesser content STAT3 in ECs followed by prolactin-induced production of VEGF, a potent proangiogenic factor able to promote angiogenesis via the positive autocrine feedback loop [89]. Interleukin- (IL-) 3 induces endothelial mitogenic proliferation by binding to the IL-3 receptor and recruitment of STAT5A and STAT5B [90]. IL-3-mediated activation of vascular ECs is accompanied with a secondary release of platelet-activating factor (PAF) that stimulates EC motility but not proliferation.

ECs were found to spontaneously respond to the vascular injury by induction of the proangiogenic transcriptional program and changes in the cellular phenotype and behavior. For example, exposure of human hepatic sinusoidal ECs to clinical doses of ionizing radiation results in upregulation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase- (MAPK-) mediated production of MMP-2 and VEGFR2 needed to degrade the extracellular matrix and basement membrane and activate ECs towards tube formation [91]. Irradiated HUVECs were observed to induce expression of angiogenesis-related miRNAs including the miR-221/222 cluster [92] that does not support neoangiogenesis itself but contributes to stabilization and integrity of already assembled neovessels. Indeed, in ECs, the miR-221/222 cluster shows antiangiogenic activity and prevents endothelial activation towards vascular remodeling and neovascularization. miR-221/222 are responsible for establishing quiescent phenotype of ECs and maintaining homeostasis of the vascular endothelium.

In consistence with this, senescent human aortic ECs were shown to express higher levels of antiangiogenic miR-221 and miR-222 [93] associated with reduced synthesis and activity of eNOS and increased production of caveolin-1, a negative eNOS regulator [30]. However, rhesus macaque mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from the bone marrow of aged animals displayed decreased expression of miRNA-221 compared with young monkeys [94]. In older humans, miR-221 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs) was also reduced while expression of its targets c-kit and PI3KR1 was increased with age [95]. Indeed, miR-221/222 could contribute to replicative senescence and cell aging but their lifespan-associated effects seem to be cell specific. Upregulation of miR221/222 in senescent ECs could be a consequence of age-related endothelial dysfunction and stimulatory effects of low-grade inflammation commonly persisted in the wall of aged vessels.

3.2. miR-221/222-Mediated Regulation of Phenotypic Plasticity of VSMCs

VSMCs are the prevalent cell type in the arterial tunica media. They are primarily involved in the regulation of vascular tone. A notable feature of VSMCs is their significant phenotypic plasticity and ability to differentiate/dedifferentiate in response to various physiological stimuli and pathological stresses such as vessel wounding or vascular pathology [29]. Quiescent VSMCs rarely proliferate and have a contractile phenotype characterized by expression of SMC-specific genes including smooth muscle α-actin (α-SMA), transgelin (TAGLN or SM22α), smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-MHC), α- and β-tropomyosins, α1-integrin, caldesmon, and calponin [96]. During dedifferentiation, VSMCs downregulate expression of contractile markers and acquire a synthetic phenotype associated with enhanced synthesis of collagens and MMPs along with induction of proliferation and motility [97]. VSMC-mediated neointimal hyperplasia plays a central and universal role in response to vascular injury and wound healing. In neointimal hyperplasia, VSMCs actively proliferate and migrate from the tunica media primarily to the tunica intima causing arterial wall thickening [98]. However, an aberrant proliferation of VSMCs is frequently involved in the pathogenesis of vascular proliferative diseases such as atherosclerosis, postangioplasty or in-stent restenosis, and transplant vasculopathy [99]. In atherosclerotic intima, the structural and functional changes of VSMCs lead to the formation of so-called secretory phenotype of VSMCs [100, 101].

miR-221/222 are highly expressed in VSMCs [32, 102]. Knockdown of miR-221 and miR-222 reduces VSMC proliferation in vitro and inhibits neointimal hyperplasia-induced intimal thickening in rat carotid artery after vascular injury [103]. Interestingly, the miR-221/222 cluster exhibits opposite activities towards vascular ECs and VSMCs. In ECs, these miRNAs inhibit proliferation and migration and cause proapoptosis. In VSMCs, both miRNAs stimulate proliferation and cell mobility and induce antiapoptosis [102]. miR-221/222 play a key role in triggering VSMC dedifferentiation and switching from the contractile phenotype to synthetic phenotype [102]. The miR-221/222 cluster was reported to be markedly upregulated in quiescent VSMCs in response to vascular injury and in proliferative VSMCs [102]. In VSMCs, the miRNA cluster expression in response to injury is induced by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) [26].

PDGF is released from platelets and endothelial cells at sites of vascular injury [104]. In VSMCs, PDGF-induced miR-221/222 expression leads to the inhibition of several cell cycle regulators such as p27Kip1, p57Kip2, and c-kit [26, 102]. miR-221-dependent downregulation of p27Kip1 is crucial for PDGF-mediated induction of cell proliferation. Interestingly, miR-221 and Skp2 (S-phase kinase-associated protein 2) were shown to temporally regulate p27Kip1 in VSMCs: miR-221 in G1-phase while Skp2 in S-phase associated with cell growth [105]. Skp2 is a component of the ubiquitin protein ligase complex (SKP1-cullin-F-box) that is involved in the control of cell cycle progression via degradation of CDKs, cyclins, and CDK inhibitors including p27Kip1 [106].

Like p27Kip1, p57Kip2 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C, CDKN1C) suppresses several G1 cyclin/Cdk complexes preventing cell proliferation [107]. In addition, p57Kip2 stabilizes and activates MyoD, a myogenic regulatory transcription factor, essential for muscle differentiation [108]. miR-221-induced downregulation of p57Kip2 results in inactivation of MyoD and prevention of VSMC differentiation towards the contractile phenotype (Figure 2). Decreased c-Kit causes inhibition of SMC-specific contractile gene transcription program by reducing expression of Myocardin (Myocd), a potent SMC-specific nuclear coactivator [109]. Indeed, miR-221 mediates PDGF-induced phenotypic changes in VSMCs by blocking expression of SMC contractile genes and stimulating VSMC dedifferentiation, proliferation, and migration.

4. Role of miR-221/222 in Atherosclerotic Vascular Remodeling

4.1. Inhibitory Effects of miR-221/222 on ECs in Atherosclerosis-Associated Vascular Remodeling

In mammals, the cardiovascular function is greatly influenced by the interaction between the hemodynamics and the vascular endothelium. Shear stress is created by blood flow when by blood flow affects the endothelium. Shear-induced mechanotransduction (e.g., conversion of mechanical stresses to biochemical responses) is especially influential in elastic vessels such as aorta and arteries where blood flow controls vascular tone and structure [110]. Mechanical stimulation of vascular endothelium with shear stress results in release of endothelial-derived vasoactive substances such as NO, growth factors, prostaglandins, and so forth. Sustained changes in local hemodynamics stimulate adaptive structural remodeling of the artery wall through coordinated changes in expression of multiple vascular proteins.

Shear stress induces phenotypic changes in the vascular endothelium in specific aortic and arterial sites that in turn specify whether this site will be resistant or prone to proatherogenic changes and progression to the atherosclerotic plaque [111, 112]. In principal, intensive shear stress is beneficial since it promotes adaptive dilatation or structural arterial remodeling through mechanisms mediated by endothelium [113]. In hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes, endothelial dysfunction that is considered as a primary manifestation of cardiovascular disease is systemic and is widely attributed to impaired expression of eNOS [114]. Shear stress induces eNOS expression and hence results in greater availability of NO. Since NO is protected vessels from oxidative stress and inflammation, vascular zones with low NO production will be more susceptible to atherosclerosis.

Apolipoprotein E- (ApoE-) deficient mice spontaneously develop atherosclerosis when fed on high cholesterol diet. When a tapered cast was placed around the carotid artery in ApoE-deficient mice, low NO production and advanced lesions were observed in the atherosclerosis-prone flow separation region located immediately downstream of the cast [115]. Further studies on ApoE-deficient mice with implanted cast showed that shear stress type (such as lowered stress or oscillatory stress) is an essential condition for establishing plaque phenotype. Lowered shear stress induces larger lesions with a vulnerable plaque phenotype, whereas vortices with oscillatory shear stress induce stable lesions [116].

Atherosclerosis-resistant and atherosclerosis-susceptible arterial regions were shown to have differentiated endothelial-specific transcriptome patterns, with global expression shifted towards upregulation of proinflammatory and procoagulant genes in susceptible regions and towards upregulation of antioxidant and anticoagulant genes in resistant regions [111, 117]. Disturbed blood flow also contributes to the formation of atherosclerosis-prone vascular regions. Indeed, coordinated regulation of gene expression in ECs in response to local shear stresses should determine regional endothelial phenotypes that protect or predispose to atherosclerosis [118, 119]. Unidirectional and laminar shear stress correlates with transcript profiles considered protective (e.g., antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and antiproliferative) [120].

Recently, researchers implemented comparative quantification of global miRNA transcriptome in endothelium derived from atheroresistant and atherosusceptible arterial regions in order to identify miRNAs whose expression could distinguish between resistant and susceptible regions. A role of miR-10a in establishing proinflammatory endothelial phenotype in atherosusceptible aortic endothelium was revealed [121]. In swine aorta, site-specific miR-92a regulation of expression of endothelial antiatherogenic transcription Krüppel-like factors- (KLF-) 2 and 4 was shown to contribute to endothelial phenotype heterogeneity associated with regional atherosusceptibility and protection in vivo [122].

Upregulation of the miR-221/222 cluster in arterial ECs appears to be proatherogenic since these miRNAs downregulate eNOS and inhibit angiogenesis essential for vascular repair. In addition, miR-221 targets PI3KR1 that is involved in the regulation of PI3K/Akt-mediated signaling that was shown to stimulate the atheroprotective transcription factor Nrf2 (nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2) [120]. Notably, expression of Nrf2 in ECs is induced by mechanical forces (e.g., by shear stress) [123] and contributes to formation of the endothelial regional atherosclerosis-resistant phenotype in vessels [120]. In ECs, Nrf2 drives expression of several antioxidant genes and downregulates several inflammatory mediators such as monocyte chemoattractant protein- (MCP-) 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) therefore enhancing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of the arterial epithelium [124]. Furthermore, expression levels of circulating miR-221/222 are dynamically modulated by blood flow since they were shown to be upregulated by acute exercise before and after sustained training [107]. Indeed, miR-221/222 have a promising potential to be used for mapping atherosusceptible regions in apparently normal arteries.

miR-221 and miR-222 could be upregulated in the vascular epithelium and VSMCs in angiotensin II dependent manner [32, 39]. Pathological activation of the renin-angiotensin system is an established cardiovascular risk factor associated with the development of endothelial dysfunction and essential hypertension [125]. Vascular inflammation, an essential feature of atherosclerosis, also stimulates expression of both miRNAs in the vascular wall [30, 32, 60]. High glucose was shown to induce elevated levels of miR-221 in ECs that impairs normal endothelial function [37]. Furthermore, in blood serum of patients with metabolic syndrome, increased concentrations of circulating miR-221 were detected [126]. Given a prominent role of diabetic hyperglycemia and cardiometabolic stress in the development of cardiovascular pathology, increased expression of the miR-221/222 cluster in vascular tissues should predispose to atherosclerosis and increase risk of endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. In susceptible individuals, arterial expression of miR-221/222 may be enhanced even in early atherosclerotic stages such as preclinical atherosclerosis [127].

The initial stage of atherosclerosis is characterized by proinflammatory recruitment of leukocytes to activated ECs [128]. Since miR-221 was shown to suppress adhesiveness of ECs through inhibiting several adhesion-related molecules such as VCAM-1, CD47, and PAK1 [59, 129], it seems to initially play an atheroprotective role and is upregulated as a part of the adaptive inflammatory-driven response in order to maintain endothelial homeostasis and quiescent phenotype and prevent activation of arterial ECs. However, continuous proinflammatory stimulation of ECs in early atherosclerosis further upregulates miR-221/222 that in turn promotes switch in the adaptive reaction to the maladaptive proatherogenic response. In atherosclerosis, elevated miR-221/222 inhibits angiogenic activation and therefore limits recruitment and availability of EPCs for vascular repair [70, 130]. In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), increased serum levels of miR-221 were reported to inversely correlate with numbers of EPCs [131]. Treatment with atorvastatin, a lipid-lowering agent, results in decreasing miR-221 levels and restoring EPC numbers in CAD patients [131]. In diabetes-related atherosclerosis, hyperglycemia and advanced glycation-end products (AGEs) contribute to endothelial dysfunction and cell cycle arrest. AGE-induced downregulation of miR-221/222 in vascular ECs leads to subsequent activation of their targets p27Kip1 and p57Kip2 that in turn suppress cell cycle progression [132].

Serum miR-221 was reported to be significantly increased in internal mammary arteries of diabetic subjects with coronary artery bypass grafts [133], in patients with carotid atherosclerosis and CAD patients [131]. However, some reports showed reduced levels of serum miR-221 in subjects with atherosclerosis obliterans [134] and atherosclerotic patients with subclinical hypothyroidism [135]. In advanced atherosclerosis, long-term chronic inflammation, which occurs parallel with remodeling of the intimal extracellular matrix [136], was found to downregulate expression of the miR-221/222 cluster in vascular ECs [60]. Probably, suppression of miR-221/222 could precede the neointima formation in atherosclerotic vessels when the recruitment of ECs is needed to support neoangiogenesis. Inflammatory factors suppressing miR-221/222 in ECs should be detected. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), a proinflammatory cytokine, inhibits miR-221 expression in cholangiocytes but it is unknown whether IFN-γ is involved in miR-221 suppression in ECs [137]. Another inflammatory cytokine that is likely to regulate vascular expression of miR-221 in atherosclerosis is high-mobility group B1 (HMGB1; alarmin) [138]. HMGB1 was found to play a remarkable role in atherosclerosis-associated inflammation by signaling via receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and Toll-like receptors [139].

4.2. miR-221/222 Cluster Induces VSMC-Mediated Neointima Formation and Contributes to Vascular Calcification in Atherosclerosis

Like PDGF, angiotensin II is able to induce miR-221/222 [39], followed by VSMC proliferation and hypertrophy [140]. Angiotensin II induced activation of miR-221/222 expression in VSMCs is more attributable to vascular pathology such as hypertension, restenosis, or atherosclerosis and is accompanied with induction of the proinflammatory microenvironment [141]. In VCMCs, angiotensin II stimulates expression of miR-221 through binding to angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) that mediates activation of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), a transcription factor [36]. miR-221 was found to show a positive feedback on its own expression by suppressing RASA1 (RAS p21 protein activator 1), a CREB inhibitor. miR-221 also negatively regulates PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog), a suppressor of Akt/PI3K signaling that induces NF-κB-mediated production of inflammatory chemokine MCP-1 [36]. Indeed, angiotensin II dependent downregulation of PTEN results in increased expression of proinflammatory mediators and activates proliferation, hypertrophy, and migration of VSMCs [142].

PDGF production and PDGF-dependent signaling were shown to be activated in vascular proliferative diseases including atherosclerosis and restenosis and therefore could drive VSMC recruitment in vascular remodeling [143]. Indeed, PDGF-induced miR-221/222 upregulation followed by suppression of the cell cycle regulator p27Kip1 in VSMCs could contribute to atherogenesis because loss of p27Kip1 was reported to aggravate atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice [144, 145]. In ApoE-deficient mice, expression of transgenic ApoE, an essential component of serum high density lipoproteins (HDL) and triglyceride-enriched lipoproteins that possess atheroprotective properties, negatively regulates miR-221/222 and restores p27Kip1 expression in VSMCs thereby preventing pathological recruitment of these cells in atherosclerosis-related vascular remodeling. ApoE was found to downregulate miR-221 and miR-222 in a Cox-2 (prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase)/prostacyclin/inositol monophosphate-dependent manner [146]. ApoE could also prevent dedifferentiation of VSMCs by suppressing PDGF-mediated entry to S-phase through activation of inducible NOS [147] or interaction with perlecan, an extracellular matrix protein [148]. However, these mechanisms are dependent on specific ApoE isoforms while all three isoforms of ApoE are able to suppress miR-221/222 through Cox-2-dependent pathway [146]. Indeed, due to capacity of all ApoE isoforms to regulate miR-221/222-dependent input to control of VSMC phenotypic plasticity, this mechanism could represent the major way by which ApoE may limit proatherogenic entrance of VSMCs to arterial remodeling.

In the family of CDK protein inhibitors (p15Ink4A, p16Ink4B, p18Ink4C, p19Ink4D, p21Waf1/Cip1, p27Kip1, and p57Kip2), three cell cycle regulators (p21Waf1/Cip1, p27Kip1, and p57Kip2) play a central role in control of VSMC differentiation/dedifferentiation because p57Kip2 regulates G1/S transition of cell cycle while p21Waf1/Cip1 and p27Kip1utilize different molecular mechanisms of CDK inhibition in G1-phase [149, 150]. Since miR-221 and miR-222 target two of them (p27Kip1 and p57Kip2), and this miRNA cluster may have a profound impact in the regulation of the role of VSMCs in proatherogenic neointimal hyperplasia [24, 127].

Furthermore, results recently presented by Mackenzie et al. [34, 151] about supportive effects of miR-221/222 on vascular calcification expand proatherogenic properties of this miRNA cluster. Calcification commonly affects the arterial tree in a variety of diseases and pathological conditions [152155], with calcification process often being associated with VSMCs [152, 156]. In calcifying VSMCs transfected with miR-221/222 mimics, a significant increase in intracellular calcium accumulation associated with quantitative changes in expression of ectonucleotide phosphodiesterase 1 (Enpp1) and Pit-1 (sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter) expression was observed [34]. Both proteins are essential for regulation of intracellular phosphate levels and hence are primarily involved in control of calcium phosphate deposits in osteogenesis and pathogenic ectopic mineralization including atherosclerosis-related arterial calcification [157]. Interestingly, when VSMCs were transfected with miR-221 and miR-222 mimics, an increase in calcium deposition was observed in combined treatment but not in individual miR treatments suggesting for synergistic effects of miR-221/222 on vascular calcification [151]. Both miRNAs were shown to contribute to VSMC calcification independently of osteogenic transcription factors Runx2 (runt-related transcription factor 2) and Msx2 (MSH homeobox 2) [34].

Calcification of VSMCs is associated with significant decrease in miR-221/222 levels [151]. Indeed, downregulation of miR-221/222 could induce osteogenic/chondrogenic changes in the VSMC phenotype. These observations are in agreement with the data presented by Li et al. [158] who detected reduced levels of miR-221/222 in sclerotic intima samples from patients with atherosclerosis obliterans compared to the normal vascular tissues. In advanced atherosclerosis, long-term inflammation decreases miR-221/222 in ECs [60]. It is likely that chronic vascular inflammation could also diminish miR-221/222 expression in VSMCs and therefore promote induction of phenotypic changes towards calcifying cells. However, molecular mechanisms by which the miR-221/222 cluster contributes to vascular calcification are widely unknown and indeed should be precisely evaluated in future studies.

4.3. Challenges for Analysis of the Roles of miR-221/222 in Functioning of Cells Types That Represent Minor Cell Populations in the Vascular Wall

Current appreciation of a remarkable role of miRNAs in vascular biology of VSMCs and ECs warrants investigation of possible contribution of miR-221/222 to functioning of other cell types residing in the vascular wall, in both homeostatic and pathological conditions. In particular, such a demand is relevant to investigation of vascular dendritic cells representing the most crucial cell type that regulates immune processes in atherogenesis and other vascular pathologies in which immune inflammation plays an important role [159162]. Accumulating evidence indicates that miRNAs, including miR-221/222, are importantly involved in functioning of dendritic cells in other organs and other pathologies [163165]. In particular, differentially expressed microRNAs have been reported to regulate plasmacytoid versus conventional dendritic cell development [164]. As vascular dendritic cells (VDCs) represent a minor cell population in the arterial wall [159], obviously there would be some methodological difficulties during the investigation. However, the recent achievements in the visualization of miRNA localization in cells within biological tissue sections by a combination of in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry [166168] along with the achievements in the development of protocols for the isolation of arterial cells by means of the use of laser capture-microdissection technique [169171] would assist in investigation of the impact of miR-221/222 in controlling of behavior patterns of dendritic cells in various vascular pathologies.

5. Extravasal Functional Effects of miR-221/222 Increasing Cardiovascular Risk

In addition to the direct regulation of function and development of vascular cells, miR-221 and miR-222 exhibit their effects on nonvascular tissues. Some of these functional activities could be related to the development of atherosclerosis or cardiometabolic risk factors that promote atherogenesis. In the adipose tissue, miR-221 was recently found to control fat metabolism by affecting PPAR- (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-) dependent pathways and by directly targeting adiponectin receptor AdipoR1 and Ets1 [172]. miR-221 and RNA-binding protein polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (PTB) cooperate in negative posttranslational control of AdipoR1 in muscle and liver of genetic and dietary murine models of obesity that suggests a supportive role of miR-221 in insulin resistance in peripheral tissues [173].

AdipoR1 mediates biological effects of adiponectin, an adipocyte-specific cytokine, mainly focused on the regulation of glucose metabolism (increased glucose uptake, reduced gluconeogenesis) and fat metabolism (activation of lipid catabolism, oxidation of fatty acids, and utilization of triglycerides) [174]. Interestingly, in vascular ECs, AdipoR1 mediates vasculoprotective properties of adiponectin associated with anti-inflammation (inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-α- (TNF-α-) induced expression of ICAM-1 and NF-κB) and prevention of vascular dysfunction [175]. However, it is unclear whether miR-221 targets AdipoR1 in the vascular endothelium. In cultured preadipocytes, leptin and proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α suppress expression of miR-221 [172]. Similarly, Chou et al. [176] showed decreased levels of miR-221 in MSCs derived from the adipose tissue of obese women, and miR-221 expression was negatively correlated with levels of TNF-α mRNA in obese adipocytes. Indeed, TNF-α could downregulate miR-221 in adipocytes.

Overall, miR-221, which is upregulated in obese individuals [172], is involved in insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, for example, two metabolic conditions that greatly increase atherosclerotic risk. In morbidly obese individuals, blood levels of miR221/222 are markedly increased [177]. In adipocytes, miR-221 contributes to the regulation of physiological network involved in fatty acid metabolism by targeting several proteins including fatty acid synthase (FASN), an enzyme overexpressed in the adipose tissue in obesity and type 2 diabetes [178]. In obese people, adipocytes have activated fat metabolism associated with lipolysis and enhanced release of free fatty acids to blood. Fatty acids promote insulin resistance via suppressing insulin signaling by stimulating serine protein kinases that phosphorylate insulin receptor substrates (IRS) and disrupt the downstream transduction of signal from the insulin receptor [179].

Serum miR-221 levels were shown to be elevated in women affected with metabolic syndrome although no significant correlations were observed between blood miR-221 concentrations and cardiometabolic risk factors [126]. Diabetic hyperglycemia and products of advanced nonenzymatic oxidative glycation that are significantly increased in diabetic blood were shown to stimulate expression of miR-221/222 in the vascular wall [37, 133, 180]. Indeed, upregulated expression of the miR-221/222 cluster in vessels of people with obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes increases cardiovascular risk and promotes the development of atherosclerosis through endothelial dysfunction and neointimal hyperplasia. The proatherogenic role of miR-221/222 is supported by the fact of suppressing effects of lipid-lowering agents (atorvastatin), antidiabetic drugs (metformin), and garlic preparations on vascular expression of this miRNA cluster [58, 130, 131, 133].

6. Clinical Potential of miR-221/222

Serum levels of circulating miR-221 were shown to be significantly changed in several vascular and metabolic pathologies including hypertension, obesity, metabolic syndrome, CAD, and carotid atherosclerosis that make this miRNA a potential diagnostic biomarker. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, miR-221 was found to be significantly increased only in platelets and PMBCs of those with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction but not with a ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) suggesting a potential diagnostic value of this miRNA for distinguishing between STEMI and NSTEMI [181]. A phenomenon of the blood flow-mediated regulation of expression of miR-221 in the vascular wall should be studied in detail because differential expression of miR-221 in arterial wall harbors a promise of identification of atheroprone and atheroresistant vascular regions in asymptomatic patients or subjects with subclinical atherosclerosis that is important for early diagnosis and prophylaxis of cardiovascular disease.

To date, the major progress on the way of clinical utility of miR-221/222 in cardiovascular medicine was achieved in the field of stem cell therapy for cardiovascular diseases. The miR-221/222 cluster is critically involved in the regulation of myogenesis and function of myocardium [173, 182184]. Both in myoblasts and myotubules, miR221/222 expression was shown to be under control of the Ras-MAPK pathway and inversely correlated with levels of p27Kip1, a common target for these miRNAs [182]. The cluster could also contribute to several heart pathologies including myotonic dystrophy type 2 [185] and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (through targeting p27Kip1, a cardiac hypertrophic suppressor in cardiomyocytes) [35, 59, 186].

Treatment with a prosurvival cocktail consisting of lentivirus constructs carrying the precursor of miR-21, miR-24, and miR-221 significantly improved survival and engraftment of cardiomyocyte precursors after transplantation to the mouse cardiac muscle [187]. In part, the prosurvival effect of the miRNA cocktail was supported by inhibition of BIM/BCL2L11 (BCL2-like 11), a critical apoptotic activator, which is a common target for all three miRNAs [187]. In advanced oxidative stress, miR-221 was demonstrated to cooperate with superoxide dismutase-2 in unacylated ghrelin-driven muscle repair after oxidative injury by downregulation of p57Kip1 that in turn promotes cell cycle progression [180]. In addition, miR-221 was found to support survival of cocultures of primary rat neonatal ventricle cardiomyocytes and MSCs transduced with GATA-4 (a critical transcription factor for proper mammalian cardiac development) in hypoxic conditions. The miR-221-mediated cardioprotection was achieved via downregulation of p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA). Interestingly, compared to cardiomyocytes, cultured MSCs developed significantly higher expression levels of miR-221 and supported cardiomyocyte viability by shedding miR-221-containing microvesicles [188]. Thus, miR-221 show marked cardioprotective and antiapoptotic properties that would be beneficial for increasing efficiency of cardiac cell transplantation and heart regeneration.

7. Conclusions

Likewise other miRNAs [189194], the miR-221/222 cluster plays a remarkable role in vascular biology and vascular pathology. In the vascular tissue, these miRNAs exhibit cell-specific effects by supporting dedifferentiation proliferation and migration of VSMCs while inhibiting proliferation and motility of ECs. In different muscle lineage cells, miR-221 and miR-222 show similar effects by activating regenerative properties through targeting key cell cycle regulators p21Waf1/Cip1, p27Kip1, and p57Kip2 involved in induction of expression of contractile proteins. In contrast to antiangiogenic activity in vascular ECs, miR-221/222 were shown to support tumor-associated neoangiogenesis and invasion in many cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma [195], breast cancer [196], lung cancer [197], colorectal cancer [198], and other epithelial cancers. Tumorigenic function of miR-221/222-mediated is mainly attributed to targeting several key tumor suppressors such as p21Waf1/Cip1, p27Kip1, p57Kip2, PTEN, and PUMA [199, 200].

In epithelial cancers, the miR-221/222 cluster is involved in induction of EMT, a mechanism that leads to phenotypic changes in cancer cells and cancer-associated ECs towards increased dedifferentiation, mobility, adhesion, and invasiveness [201]. It seems that tumor progression to metastasis stage does not happen occasionally and chaotically but is induced in a coordinated manner, with burst in tumor neovascularization. EMT was shown to play a central role in vasculogenic mimicry, a new pattern of tumor microcirculation, in which cancer cells acquire properties of vascular cells having tumor and endothelial phenotypes with maintenance of stem cell-like characteristics to form capillary-like structures in the tumor mass [202]. Hypoxia promotes vasculogenic mimicry formation by inducing EMT [203]. Indeed, activation of the proinvasive EMT mechanism should be involved in the control of tumor-associated neovascularization since tumor microvascular network facilitates mobilization of tumor cells to circulation and further expansion [204]. For example, miR-106b/93 and miR-221/222 are upregulated in gastric cancer tissues and control suppression of CDK protein inhibitors in a coordinated manner thereby stimulating tumor invasion and progression [199]. EMT is absent in normal and diseased noncancer vascular tissues and therefore does not influence neoangiogenesis. Therefore, upregulated production of miR-221/222 in terminally differentiated vascular ECs will inhibit angiogenic activation whereas downregulation of this miRNA cluster will favor induction of neoangiogenesis.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank the Russian Scientific Foundation (Grant no. 14-15-00112) for support of their work.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Pugsley M. K., Tabrizchi R. The vascular system: an overview of structure and function. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods. 2000;44(2):333–340. doi: 10.1016/S1056-8719(00)00125-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lannoy M., Slove S., Jacob M. P. The function of elastic fibers in the arteries: beyond elasticity. Pathologie Biologie. 2014;62(2):79–83. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2014.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Korshunov V. A., Schwartz S. M., Berk B. C. Vascular remodeling: hemodynamic and biochemical mechanisms underlying Glagov's phenomenon. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27(8):1722–1728. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.106.129254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cowan D. B., Langille B. L. Cellular and molecular biology of vascular remodeling. Current Opinion in Lipidology. 1996;7(2):94–100. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199604000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gerecht-Nir S., Osenberg S., Nevo O., Ziskind A., Coleman R., Itskovitz-Eldor J. Vascular development in early human embryos and in teratomas derived from human embryonic stem cells. Biology of Reproduction. 2004;71(6):2029–2036. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.031930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lucitti J. L., Jones E. A. V., Huang C., Chen J., Fraser S. E., Dickinson M. E. Vascular remodeling of the mouse yolk sac requires hemodynamic force. Development. 2007;134(18):3317–3326. doi: 10.1242/dev.02883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garcia M. D., Larina I. V. Vascular development and hemodynamic force in the mouse yolk sac. Frontiers in Physiology. 2014;5(article 308) doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tzima E., Irani-Tehrani M., Kiosses W. B., et al. A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature. 2005;437(7057):426–431. doi: 10.1038/nature03952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Conway D. E., Breckenridge M. T., Hinde E., Gratton E., Chen C. S., Schwartz M. A. Fluid shear stress on endothelial cells modulates mechanical tension across VE-cadherin and PECAM-1. Current Biology. 2013;23(11):1024–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Robb L., Lyons I., Li R., et al. Absence of yolk sac hematopoiesis from mice with a targeted disruption of the scl gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92(15):7075–7079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.7075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Matsumoto N., Kubo A., Liu H., et al. Developmental regulation of yolk sac hematopoiesis by Krüppel-like factor 6. Blood. 2006;107(4):1357–1365. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krankel N., Luscher T. F., Landmesser U. Novel insights into vascular repair mechanisms. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2014;20(14):2430–2438. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li M., Li S., Yu L., et al. Bone mesenchymal stem cells contributed to the neointimal formation after arterial injury. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082743.e82743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wara A. K., Manica A., Marchini J. F., et al. Bone marrow-derived kruppel-like factor 10 controls reendothelialization in response to arterial injury. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2013;33(7):1552–1560. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stenmark K. R., Yeager M. E., El Kasmi K. C., et al. The adventitia: essential regulator of vascular wall structure and function. Annual Review of Physiology. 2013;75:23–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Orekhov A. N., Bobryshev Y. V., Chistiakov D. A. The complexity of cell composition of the intima of large arteries: focus on pericyte-like cells. Cardiovascular Research. 103(4):438–451. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvu168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Libby P., Ridker P. M., Hansson G. K. Leducq Transatlantic Network on Atherothrombosis. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: from pathophysiology to practice. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;54(23):2129–2138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Libby P., Lichtman A., Hansson G. Immune effector mechanisms implicated in atherosclerosis: from mice to humans. Immunity. 2013;38(6):1092–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Glagov S., Weisenberg E., Zarins C. K., Stankunavicius R., Kolettis G. J. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1987;316(22):1371–1375. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198705283162204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lim S., Park S. Role of vascular smooth muscle cell in the inflammation of atherosclerosis. BMB Reports. 2014;47(1):1–7. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2014.47.1.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Puddu P., Muscari A., Puddu G. M., Cravero E., Giannoni C., Zoli M. The complexity of platelet metabolism and its contribution to atherothrombosis. Acta Cardiologica. 2009;64(2):157–165. doi: 10.2143/AC.64.2.2035338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xu F., Sun Y., Chen Y., et al. Endothelial cell apoptosis is reponsible for the formation of coronary thrombotic atherosclerotic plaques. Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2009;218(1):25–33. doi: 10.1620/tjem.218.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Otsuka F., Sakakura K., Yahagi K., Joner M., Virmani R. Has our understanding of calcification in human coronary atherosclerosis progressed? Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2014;34(4):724–736. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wei Y., Schober A., Weber C. Pathogenic arterial remodeling: the good and bad of microRNAs. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2013;304(8):H1050–H1059. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00267.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Poliseno L., Tuccoli A., Mariani L., et al. MicroRNAs modulate the angiogenic properties of HUVECs. Blood. 2006;108(9):3068–3071. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-01-012369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Davis B. N., Hilyard A. C., Nguyen P. H., Lagna G., Hata A. Induction of microRNA-221 by platelet-derived growth factor signaling is critical for modulation of vascular smooth muscle phenotype. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284(6):3728–3738. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808788200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kuehbacher A., Urbich C., Dimmeler S. Targeting microRNA expression to regulate angiogenesis. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2008;29(1):12–15. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Albinsson S., Sessa W. C. Can microRNAs control vascular smooth muscle phenotypic modulation and the response to injury? Physiological Genomics. 2011;43(10):529–533. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00146.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Song Z., Li G. Role of specific MicroRNAs in regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation and the response to injury. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2010;3(3):246–250. doi: 10.1007/s12265-010-9163-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rippe C., Blimline M., Magerko K. A., et al. MicroRNA changes in human arterial endothelial cells with senescence: relation to apoptosis, eNOS and inflammation. Experimental Gerontology. 2012;47(1):45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Santhekadur P. K., Das S. K., Gredler R., et al. Multifunction protein staphylococcal nuclease domain containing 1 (SND1) promotes tumor angiogenesis in human hepatocellular carcinoma through novel pathway that involves nuclear factor κB and miR-221. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287(17):13952–13958. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.321646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhu N., Zhang D., Chen S., et al. Endothelial enriched microRNAs regulate angiotensin II-induced endothelial inflammation and migration. Atherosclerosis. 2011;215(2):286–293. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ogawa T., Enomoto M., Fujii H., et al. MicroRNA-221/222 upregulation indicates the activation of stellate cells and the progression of liver fibrosis. Gut. 2012;61(11):1600–1609. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mackenzie N. C., Staines K. A., Zhu D., Genever P., Macrae V. E. miRNA-221 and miRNA-222 synergistically function to promote vascular calcification. Cell Biochemistry and Function. 2014;32(2):209–216. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang C., Wang S., Zhao P., et al. MiR-221 promotes cardiac hypertrophy in vitro through the modulation of p27 expression. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2012;113(6):2040–2046. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jin W., Reddy M. A., Chen Z., et al. Small RNA sequencing reveals MicroRNAs that modulate angiotensin II effects in vascular smooth muscle cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287(19):15672–15683. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.322669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li Y., Song Y.-H., Li F., Yang T., Lu Y. W., Geng Y.-J. microRNA-221 regulates high glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2009;381(1):81–83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.di Leva G., Gasparini P., Piovan C., et al. MicroRNA cluster 221-222 and estrogen receptor α interactions in breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2010;102(10):706–721. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Leung A., Trac C., Jin W., et al. Novel long noncoding RNAs are regulated by angiotensin II in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circulation Research. 2013;113(3):266–278. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.300849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Landthaler M., Yalcin A., Tuschl T. The human DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8 and its D. melanogaster homolog are required for miRNA biogenesis. Current Biology. 2004;14(23):2162–2167. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bohnsack M. T., Czaplinski K., Görlich D. Exportin 5 is a RanGTP-dependent dsRNA-binding protein that mediates nuclear export of pre-miRNAs. RNA. 2004;10(2):185–191. doi: 10.1261/rna.5167604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chendrimada T. P., Gregory R. I., Kumaraswamy E., et al. TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processing and gene silencing. Nature. 2005;436(7051):740–744. doi: 10.1038/nature03868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim V. N. MicroRNA biogenesis: coordinated cropping and dicing. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2005;6(5):376–385. doi: 10.1038/nrm1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yao B., Li S., Chan E. K. L. Function of GW182 and GW bodies in siRNA and miRNA pathways. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2013;768:71–96. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5107-5-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang J., Välineva T., Hong J., et al. Transcriptional co-activator protein p100 interacts with snRNP proteins and facilitates the assembly of the spliceosome. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35(13):4485–4494. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Meng X., Thiel K. W., Leslie K. K. Drug resistance mediated by AEG-1/MTDH/LYRIC. Advances in Cancer Research. 2013;120:135–157. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-401676-7.00005-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Khvorova A., Reynolds A., Jayasena S. D. Functional siRNAs and miRNAs exhibit strand bias. Cell. 2003;115(2):209–216. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00801-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kulkarni M., Ozgur S., Stoecklin G. On track with P-bodies. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2010;38(1):242–251. doi: 10.1042/BST0380242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sen G. L., Blau H. M. Argonaute 2/RISC resides in sites of mammalian mRNA decay known as cytoplasmic bodies. Nature Cell Biology. 2005;7(6):633–636. doi: 10.1038/ncb1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.MacFarlane L.-A., Murphy P. R. MicroRNA: biogenesis, function and role in cancer. Current Genomics. 2010;11(7):537–561. doi: 10.2174/138920210793175895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Brennecke J., Stark A., Russell R. B., Cohen S. M. Principles of microRNA-target recognition. PLoS Biology. 2005;3(3, article e85) doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Maillet L., Tu C., Hong Y. K., Shuster E. O., Collart M. A. The essential function of Not1 lies within the Ccr4-Not complex. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2000;303(2):131–143. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Coller J., Parker R. Eukaryotic mRNA decapping. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2004;73:861–890. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Maroney P. A., Yu Y., Fisher J., Nilsen T. W. Evidence that microRNAs are associated with translating messenger RNAs in human cells. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology. 2006;13(12):1102–1107. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Arribere J. A., Doudna J. A., Gilbert W. V. Reconsidering movement of eukaryotic mRNAs between polysomes and P bodies. Molecular Cell. 2011;44(5):745–758. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mugge A., Forstermann U., Lichtlen P. R. Endothelial functions in cardiovascular diseases. Zeitschrift für Kardiologie. 1989;78(3):147–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Schwartz B. G., Economides C., Mayeda G. S., Burstein S., Kloner R. A. The endothelial cell in health and disease: its function, dysfunction, measurement and therapy. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2010;22(2):77–90. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2009.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chiang E.-P. I., Chiu S.-C., Pai M.-H., et al. Organosulfur garlic compounds induce neovasculogenesis in human endothelial progenitor cells through a modulation of MicroRNA 221 and the PI3-K/Akt signaling pathways. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2013;61(20):4839–4849. doi: 10.1021/jf304951p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Duan M., Yao H., Hu G., Chen X., Lund A. K., Buch S. HIV Tat induces expression of ICAM-1 in HUVECs: implications for miR-221/-222 in HIV-associated cardiomyopathy. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060170.e60170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dentelli P., Rosso A., Orso F., Olgasi C., Taverna D., Brizzi M. F. MicroRNA-222 controls neovascularization by regulating signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A expression. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2010;30(8):1562–1568. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.206201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Aye M. T., Hashemi S., Leclair B., et al. Expression of stem cell factor and c-kit mRNA in cultured endothelial cells, monocytes and cloned human bone marrow stromal cells (CFU-RF) Experimental Hematology. 1992;20(4):523–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Broudy V. C., Kovach N. L., Bennett L. G., Lin N., Jacobsen F. W., Kidd P. G. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells display high-affinity c-kit receptors and produce a soluble form of the c-kit receptor. Blood. 1994;83(8):2145–2152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Felli N., Fontana L., Pelosi E., et al. MicroRNAs 221 and 222 inhibit normal erythropoiesis and erythroleukemic cell growth via kit receptor down-modulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(50):18081–18086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506216102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nicoli S., Knyphausen C.-P., Zhu L. J., Lakshmanan A., Lawson N. D. miR-221 is required for endothelial tip cell behaviors during vascular development. Developmental Cell. 2012;22(2):418–429. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nicoli S., Standley C., Walker P., Hurlstone A., Fogarty K. E., Lawson N. D. MicroRNA-mediated integration of haemodynamics and Vegf signalling during angiogenesis. Nature. 2010;464(7292):1196–1200. doi: 10.1038/nature08889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Marcelo K., Sills T., Coskun S., et al. Hemogenic endothelial cell specification requires c-Kit, notch signaling, and p27-mediated cell-cycle control. Developmental Cell. 2013;27(5):504–515. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Graupera M., Guillermet-Guibert J., Foukas L. C., et al. Angiogenesis selectively requires the p110α isoform of PI3K to control endothelial cell migration. Nature. 2008;453(7195):662–666. doi: 10.1038/nature06892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Vanhaesebroeck B., Guillermet-Guibert J., Graupera M., Bilanges B. The emerging mechanisms of isoform-specific PI3K signalling. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2010;11(5):329–341. doi: 10.1038/nrm2882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang J. F., Zhang X., Groopman J. E. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 and its downstream signaling promote cell survival under oxidative stress. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279(26):27088–27097. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M314015200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhang X., Mao H., Chen J.-Y., et al. Increased expression of microRNA-221 inhibits PAK1 in endothelial progenitor cells and impairs its function via c-Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2013;431(3):404–408. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhang S., Han J., Sells M. A., et al. Rho family GTPases regulate p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase through the downstream mediator Pak1. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1995;270(41):23934–23936. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.41.23934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Soga N., Namba N., McAllister S., et al. Rho family GTPases regulate VEGF-stimulated endothelial cell motility. Experimental Cell Research. 2001;269(1):73–87. doi: 10.1006/excr.2001.5295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Fryer B. H., Wang C., Vedantam S., et al. cGMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylates p21-activated kinase (Pak) 1, inhibiting Pak/Nck binding and stimulating Pak/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein association. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281(17):11487–11495. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600279200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Park E. R., Eblen S. T., Catling A. D. MEK1 activation by PAK: A novel mechanism. Cellular Signalling. 2007;19(7):1488–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zang M., Hayne C., Luo Z. Interaction between active Pak1 and Raf-1 is necessary for phosphorylation and activation of Raf-1. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277(6):4395–4405. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110000200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chen Y., Banda M., Speyer C. L., Smith J. S., Rabson A. B., Gorski D. H. Regulation of the expression and activity of the antiangiogenic homeobox gene GAX/MEOX2 by ZEB2 and MicroRNA-221. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2010;30(15):3902–3913. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01237-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kuehbacher A., Urbich C., Zeiher A. M., Dimmeler S. Role of Dicer and Drosha for endothelial microRNA expression and angiogenesis. Circulation Research. 2007;101(1):59–68. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.153916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Suárez Y., Fernández-Hernando C., Pober J. S., Sessa W. C. Dicer dependent microRNAs regulate gene expression and functions in human endothelial cells. Circulation Research. 2007;100(8):1164–1173. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000265065.26744.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.O'Hara A. J., Chugh P., Wang L., et al. Pre-micro rna signatures delineate stages of endothelial cell transformation in kaposi sarcoma. PLoS Pathogens. 2009;5(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000389.e1000389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wu Y.-H., Hu T.-F., Chen Y.-C., et al. The manipulation of miRNA-gene regulatory networks by KSHV induces endothelial cell motility. Blood. 2011;118(10):2896–2905. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sato Y., Teruyama K., Nakano T., et al. Role of transcription factors in angiogenesis: Ets-1 promotes angiogenesis as well as endothelial apoptosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2001;947:117–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Förstermann U., Münzel T. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular disease: from marvel to menace. Circulation. 2006;113(13):1708–1714. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sánchez-Tilló E., Siles L., de Barrios O., et al. Expanding roles of ZEB factors in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. The American Journal of Cancer Research. 2011;1(7):897–912. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gorski D. H., Leal A. J. Inhibition of endothelial cell activation by the homeobox gene Gax. Journal of Surgical Research. 2003;111(1):91–99. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4804(03)00042-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chen Y., Leal A. D., Patel S., Gorski D. H. The homeobox gene GAX activates p21WAF1/CIP1 expression in vascular endothelial cells through direct interaction with upstream AT-rich sequences. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282(1):507–517. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606604200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Patel S., Leal A. D., Gorski D. H. The homeobox gene GAX inhibits angiogenesis through inhibition of nuclear factor-κB-dependent endothelial cell gene expression. Cancer Research. 2005;65(4):1414–1424. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Yang X., Qiao D., Meyer K., Friedl A. Signal transducers and activators of transcription mediate fibroblast growth factor-induced vascular endothelial morphogenesis. Cancer Research. 2009;69(4):1668–1677. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yang X., Qiao D., Meyer K., Pier T., Keles S., Friedl A. Angiogenesis induced by signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A (STAT5A) is dependent on autocrine activity of proliferin. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287(9):6490–6502. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.254631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Yang X., Meyer K., Friedl A. STAT5 and prolactin participate in a positive autocrine feedback loop that promotes angiogenesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288(29):21184–21196. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.481119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dentelli P., del Sorbo L., Rosso A., et al. Human IL-3 stimulates endothelial cell motility and promotes in vivo new vessel formation. The Journal of Immunology. 1999;163(4):2151–2159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Park M.-T., Oh E.-T., Song M.-J., Lee H., Park H. J. Radio-sensitivities and angiogenic signaling pathways of irradiated normal endothelial cells derived from diverse human organs. Journal of Radiation Research. 2012;53(4):570–580. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrs011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Vincenti S., Brillante N., Lanza V., et al. HUVEC respond to radiation by inducing the expression of pro-angiogenic MicroRNAs. Radiation Research. 2011;175(5):535–546. doi: 10.1667/RR2200.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Dellago H., Preschitz-Kammerhofer B., Terlecki-Zaniewicz L., et al. High levels of oncomiR-21 contribute to the senescence-induced growth arrest in normal human cells and its knock-down increases the replicative lifespan. Aging Cell. 2013;12(3):446–458. doi: 10.1111/acel.12069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Yu J. M., Wu X., Gimble J. M., Guan X., Freitas M. A., Bunnell B. A. Age-related changes in mesenchymal stem cells derived from rhesus macaque bone marrow. Aging Cell. 2011;10(1):66–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00646.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hooten N. N., Abdelmohsen K., Gorospe M., Ejiogu N., Zonderman A. B., Evans M. K. microRNA expression patterns reveal differential expression of target genes with age. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010724.e10724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Sobue K., Hayashi K., Nishida W. Expressional regulation of smooth muscle cell-specific genes in association with phenotypic modulation. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 1999;190(1-2):105–118. doi: 10.1023/A:1006941621170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kawai-Kowase K., Owens G. K. Multiple repressor pathways contribute to phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells. American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology. 2007;292(1):C59–C69. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00394.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Purcell C., Tennant M., McGeachie J. Neo-intimal hyperplasia in vascular grafts and its implications for autologous arterial grafting. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1997;79(3):164–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Owens G. K. Molecular control of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation and phenotypic plasticity. Novartis Foundation Symposia. 2007;283:174–191. doi: 10.1002/9780470319413.ch14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Babaev V. R., Bobryshev Y. V., Stenina O. V., Tararak E. M., Gabbiani G. Heterogeneity of smooth muscle cells in atheromatous plaque of human aorta. The American Journal of Pathology. 1990;136(5):1031–1042. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Babaev V. R., Bobryshev Y. V., Sukhova G. K., Kasantseva I. A. Monocyte/macrophage accumulation and smooth muscle cell phenotypes in early atherosclerotic lesions of human aorta. Atherosclerosis. 1993;100(2):237–248. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(93)90210-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Liu X., Cheng Y., Yang J., Xu L., Zhang C. Cell-specific effects of miR-221/222 in vessels: molecular mechanism and therapeutic application. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2012;52(1):245–255. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Liu X., Cheng Y., Zhang S., Lin Y., Yang J., Zhang C. A necessary role of miR-221 and miR-222 in vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia. Circulation Research. 2009;104(4):476–486. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.185363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.McNamara C. A., Sarembock I. J., Bachhuber B. G., et al. Thrombin and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation: implications for atherosclerosis and restenosis. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 1996;22(2):139–144. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Castagnino P., Kothapalli D., Hawthorne E. A., et al. miR-221/222 compensates for skp2-mediated p27 degradation and is a primary target of cell cycle regulation by prostacyclin and cAMP. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056140.e56140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Auld C. A., Fernandes K. M., Morrison R. F. Skp2-mediated p27(Kip1) degradation during S/G2 phase progression of adipocyte hyperplasia. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2007;211(1):101–111. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Matsuoka S., Edwards M. C., Bai C., et al. P57KIP2, a structurally distinct member of the p21CIP1 Cdk inhibitor family, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene. Genes & Development. 1995;9(6):650–662. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.6.650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Reynaud E. G., Leibovitch M. P., Tintignac L. A. J., Pelpel K., Guillier M., Leibovitch S. A. Stabilization of MyoD by direct binding to p57Kip2 . The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275(25):18767–18776. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M907412199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wang Z., Wang D.-Z., Pipes G. C. T., Olson E. N. Myocardin is a master regulator of smooth muscle gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100(12):7129–7134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1232341100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Davies P. F. Hemodynamic shear stress and the endothelium in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine. 2009;6(1):16–26. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Passerini A. G., Polacek D. C., Shi C., et al. Coexisting proinflammatory and antioxidative endothelial transcription profiles in a disturbed flow region of the adult porcine aorta. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(8):2482–2487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0305938101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Brooks A. R., Lelkes P. I., Rubanyi G. M. Gene expression profiling of vascular endothelial cells exposed to fluid mechanical forces: relevance for focal susceptibility to atherosclerosis. Endothelium. 2004;11(1):45–57. doi: 10.1080/10623320490432470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Mattsson E. J. R., Kohler T. R., Vergel S. M., Clowes A. W. Increased blood flow induces regression of intimal hyperplasia. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17(10):2245–2249. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.17.10.2245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Griffith T. M. Endothelial control of vascular tone by nitric oxide and gap junctions: a haemodynamic perspective. Biorheology. 2002;39(3-4):307–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Cheng C., van Haperen R., de Waard M., et al. Shear stress affects the intracellular distribution of eNOS: direct demonstration by a novel in vivo technique. Blood. 2005;106(12):3691–3698. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Cheng C., Tempel D., van Haperen R., et al. Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation. 2006;113(23):2744–2753. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.590018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Dai G., Kaazempur-Mofrad M. R., Natarajan S., et al. Distinct endothelial phenotypes evoked by arterial waveforms derived from atherosclerosis-susceptible and -resistant regions of human vasculature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(41):14871–14876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406073101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Suo J., Ferrara D. E., Sorescu D., Guldberg R. E., Taylor W. R., Giddens D. P. Hemodynamic shear stresses in mouse aortas: implications for atherogenesis. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27(2):346–351. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000253492.45717.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Rouleau L., Rossi J., Leask R. L. The response of human aortic endothelial cells in a stenotic hemodynamic environment: effect of duration, magnitude, and spatial gradients in wall shear stress. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2010;132(7) doi: 10.1115/1.4001217.071015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Dai G., Vaughn S., Zhang Y., Wang E. T., Garcia-Cardena G., Gimbrone M. A., Jr. Biomechanical forces in atherosclerosis-resistant vascular regions regulate endothelial redox balance via phosphoinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent activation of Nrf2. Circulation Research. 2007;101(7):723–733. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.152942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Fang Y., Shi C., Manduchi E., Civelek M., Davies P. F. MicroRNA-10a regulation of proinflammatory phenotype in athero-susceptible endothelium in vivo and in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(30):13450–13455. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002120107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Fang Y., Davies P. F. Site-specific microRNA-92a regulation of Krüppel-like factors 4 and 2 in atherosusceptible endothelium. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2012;32(4):979–987. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.244053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hsieh C.-Y., Hsiao H.-Y., Wu W.-Y., et al. Regulation of shear-induced nuclear translocation of the Nrf2 transcription factor in endothelial cells. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2009;16(1, article 12) doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Chen X. L., Dodd G., Thomas S., et al. Activation of Nrf2/ARE pathway protects endothelial cells from oxidant injury and inhibits inflammatory gene expression. The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2006;290(5):H1862–H1870. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00651.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Moon J. Y. Recent update of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Electrolytes & Blood Pressure. 2013;11(2):41–45. doi: 10.5049/EBP.2013.11.2.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wang Y.-T., Tsai P.-C., Liao Y.-C., Hsu C.-Y., Juo S.-H. H. Circulating microRNAs have a sex-specific association with metabolic syndrome. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2013;20(1, article 72) doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-20-72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Jovanović I., Živković M., Jovanović J., Djurić T., Stanković A. The co-inertia approach in identification of specific microRNA in early and advanced atherosclerosis plaque. Medical Hypotheses. 2014;83(1):11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bobryshev Y. V. Monocyte recruitment and foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. Micron. 2006;37(3):208–222. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Gong A.-Y., Hu G., Zhou R., et al. MicroRNA-221 controls expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in epithelial cells in response to Cryptosporidium parvum infection. International Journal for Parasitology. 2011;41(3-4):397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zhang Q., Kandic I., Kutryk M. J. Dysregulation of angiogenesis-related microRNAs in endothelial progenitor cells from patients with coronary artery disease. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2011;405(1):42–46. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.12.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Minami Y., Satoh M., Maesawa C., et al. Effect of atorvastatin on microRNA 221/222 expression in endothelial progenitor cells obtained from patients with coronary artery disease. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2009;39(5):359–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Togliatto G., Trombetta A., Dentelli P., Rosso A., Brizzi M. F. MIR221/MIR222-driven post-transcriptional regulation of P27KIP1 and P57KIP2 is crucial for high-glucose- and AGE-mediated vascular cell damage. Diabetologia. 2011;54(7):1930–1940. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2125-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Coleman C. B., Lightell D. J., Moss S. C., Bates M., Parrino P. E., Woods T. C. Elevation of miR-221 and -222 in the internal mammary arteries of diabetic subjects and normalization with metformin. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2013;374(1-2):125–129. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Li T., Cao H., Zhuang J., et al. Identification of miR-130a, miR-27b and miR-210 as serum biomarkers for atherosclerosis obliterans. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2011;412(1-2):66–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Zhang X., Shao S., Geng H., et al. Expression profiles of six circulating microRNAs critical to atherosclerosis in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism: a clinical study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014;99(5):E766–E774. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Chistiakov D. A., Sobenin I. A., Orekhov A. N. Vascular extracellular matrix in atherosclerosis. Cardiology in Review. 2013;21(6):270–288. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e31828c5ced. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Hu G., Gong A.-Y., Liu J., Zhou R., Deng C., Chen X.-M. miR-221 suppressesICAM-1 translation and regulates interferon-γ-induced ICAM-1 expression in human cholangiocytes. American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2010;298(4):G542–G550. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00490.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Mardente S., Mari E., Consorti F., et al. HMGB1 induces the overexpression of miR-222 and miR-221 and increases growth and motility in papillary thyroid cancer cells. Oncology Reports. 2012;28(6):2285–2289. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.2058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Luo Y., Li S.-J., Yang J., Qiu Y.-Z., Chen F.-P. HMGB1 induces an inflammatory response in endothelial cells via the RAGE-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2013;438(4):732–738. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.07.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Gibbons G. H., Pratt R. E., Dzau V. J. Vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy vs. hyperplasia: autocrine transforming growth factor-β, expression determines growth response to angiotensin II. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1992;90(2):456–461. doi: 10.1172/JCI115881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Mehta P. K., Griendling K. K. Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system. The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology. 2007;292(1):C82–C97. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00287.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Dong X., Yu L.-G., Sun R., et al. Inhibition of PTEN expression and activity by angiotensin II induces proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2013;114(1):174–182. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Andrae J., Gallini R., Betsholtz C. Role of platelet-derived growth factors in physiology and medicine. Genes and Development. 2008;22(10):1276–1312. doi: 10.1101/gad.1653708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Díez-Juan A., Andrés V. The growth suppressor p27Kip1 protects against diet-induced atherosclerosis. FASEB Journal. 2001;15(11):1989–1995. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0130com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Akyürek L. M., Boehm M., Olive M., Zhou A.-X., San H., Nabel E. G. Deficiency of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 accelerates atherogenesis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2010;396(2):359–363. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Kothapalli D., Castagnino P., Rader D. J., Phillips M. C., Lund-Katz S., Assoian R. K. Apolipoprotein E-mediated cell cycle arrest linked to p27 and the Cox2-dependent repression of miR221/222. Atherosclerosis. 2013;227(1):65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Ishigami M., Swertfeger D. K., Hui M. S., Granholm N. A., Hui D. Y. Apolipoprotein E inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation but not the inhibition of migration is mediated through activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2000;20(4):1020–1026. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.20.4.1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Paka L., Goldberg I. J., Obunike J. C., et al. Perlecan mediates the antiproliferative effect of apolipoprotein E on smooth muscle cells. An underlying mechanism for the modulation of smooth muscle cell growth? The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(51):36403–36408. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Tanner F. C., Boehm M., Akyürek L. M., et al. Differential effects of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27(Kip1), p21(Cip1) and p16(Ink4) on vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circulation. 2000;101(17):2022–2025. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.17.2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Nakano N., Urasawa K., Takagi Y., et al. Downregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor; p57kip2, is involved in the cell cycle progression of vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005;338(3):1661–1667. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.10.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Mackenzie N., Zhu D., Genever P., MacRae V. The miR-221/222 family regulates vascular smooth muscle cell calcification. Bone Abstracts. 2013;1, article PP496 [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Bobryshev Y. V. Targeting vascular calcification: up-date. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2014;20(37):p. 5799. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140212210821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Bobryshev Y. V., Lord R. S. A., Warren B. A. Calcified deposit formation in intimal thickenings of the human aorta. Atherosclerosis. 1995;118(1):9–21. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(95)05588-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Niederhoffer N., Bobryshev Y. V., Lartaud-Idjouadiene I., Giummelly P., Atkinson J. Aortic calcification produced by vitamin D3 plus nicotine. Journal of Vascular Research. 1997;34(5):386–398. doi: 10.1159/000159247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Chistiakov D. A., Sobenin I. A., Orekhov A. N., Bobryshev Y. V. Mechanisms of medial arterial calcification in diabetes. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2014;20(37):5870–5883. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140212210451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Bobryshev Y. V. Transdifferentiation of smooth muscle cells into chondrocytes in atherosclerotic arteries in situ: implications for diffuse intimal calcification. Journal of Pathology. 2005;205(5):641–650. doi: 10.1002/path.1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Villa-Bellosta R., Wang X., Millán J. L., Dubyak G. R., O'Neill W. C. Extracellular pyrophosphate metabolism and calcification in vascular smooth muscle. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2011;301(1):H61–H68. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01020.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Li T., Cao H., Zhuang J., et al. Identification of miR-130a, miR-27b and miR-210 as serum biomarkers for atherosclerosis obliterans. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2011;412(1-2):66–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Bobryshev Y. V. Dendritic cells in atherosclerosis: current status of the problem and clinical relevance. European Heart Journal. 2005;26(17):1700–1704. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Woollard K. J. Immunological aspects of atherosclerosis. Clinical Science. 2013;125(5):221–235. doi: 10.1042/CS20120576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Chistiakov D. A., Sobenin I. A., Orekhov A. N., Bobryshev Y. V. Dendritic cells: a double-edge sword in atherosclerotic inflammation. Atherosclerosis. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Ait-Oufella H., Sage A. P., Mallat Z., Tedgui A. Adaptive (T and B Cells) immunity and control by dendritic cells in atherosclerosis. Circulation Research. 2014;114(10):1640–1660. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Lu C., Huang X., Zhang X., et al. miR-221 and miR-155 regulate human dendritic cell development, apoptosis, and IL-12 production through targeting of p27 kip1, KPC1, and SOCS-1. Blood. 2011;117(16):4293–4303. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-322503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Kuipers H., Schnorfeil F. M., Brocker T. Differentially expressed microRNAs regulate plasmacytoid vs. conventional dendritic cell development. Molecular Immunology. 2010;48(1–3):333–340. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Montagner S., Orlandi E. M., Merante S., Monticelli S. The role of miRNAs in mast cells and other innate immune cells. Immunological Reviews. 2013;253(1):12–24. doi: 10.1111/imr.12042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Nielsen B. S., Holmstrøm K. Combined microRNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical detection of protein markers. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2013;986:353–365. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-311-4_22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Schneider M., Andersen D. C., Silahtaroglu A., et al. Cell-specific detection of microRNA expression during cardiomyogenesis by combined in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Journal of Molecular Histology. 2011;42(4):289–299. doi: 10.1007/s10735-011-9332-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Chaudhuri A. D., Yelamanchili S. V., Fox H. S. Combined fluorescent in situ hybridization for detection of microRNAs and immunofluorescent labeling for cell-type markers. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2013;7, article 160 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Bobryshev Y. V. Intracellular localization of oxidized low-density lipoproteins in atherosclerotic plaque cells revealed by electron microscopy combined with laser capture microdissection. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 2005;53(6):793–797. doi: 10.1369/jhc.4B6602.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Feig J. E., Fisher E. A. Laser capture microdissection for analysis of macrophage gene expression from atherosclerotic lesions. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2013;1027:123–135. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-369-5-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Malgor R., Bhatt P. M., Connolly B. A., et al. Wnt5a, TLR2 and TLR4 are elevated in advanced human atherosclerotic lesions. Inflammation Research. 2014;63(4):277–285. doi: 10.1007/s00011-013-0697-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Meerson A., Traurig M., Ossowski V., Fleming J. M., Mullins M., Baier L. J. Human adipose microRNA-221 is upregulated in obesity and affects fat metabolism downstream of leptin and TNF-α . Diabetologia. 2013;56(9):1971–1979. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2950-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Lustig Y., Barhod E., Ashwal-Fluss R., et al. RNA-binding protein PTB and MicroRNA-221 coregulate AdipoR1 translation and adiponectin signaling. Diabetes. 2014;63(2):433–445. doi: 10.2337/db13-1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Nedvídková J., Smitka K., Kopský V., Hainer V. Adiponectin, an adipocyte-derived protein. Physiological Research. 2005;54(2):133–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Zhang P., Wang Y., Fan Y., Tang Z., Wang N. Overexpression of adiponectin receptors potentiates the antiinflammatory action of subeffective dose of globular adiponectin in vascular endothelial cells. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2009;29(1):67–74. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.178061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Chou W.-W., Wang Y.-T., Liao Y.-C., Chuang S.-C., Wang S.-N., Juo S.-H. H. Decreased MicroRNA-221 is associated with high levels of TNF-α in human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells from obese woman. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2013;32(1):127–137. doi: 10.1159/000350131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Ortega F. J., Mercader J. M., Catalán V., et al. Targeting the circulating microRNA signature of obesity. Clinical Chemistry. 2013;59(5):781–792. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.195776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Berndt J., Kovacs P., Ruschke K., et al. Fatty acid synthase gene expression in human adipose tissue: association with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2007;50(7):1472–1480. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0689-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Capurso C., Capurso A. From excess adiposity to insulin resistance: the role of free fatty acids. Vascular Pharmacology. 2012;57(2–4):91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2012.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Togliatto G., Trombetta A., Dentelli P., et al. Unacylated ghrelin promotes skeletal muscle regeneration following hindlimb ischemia via SOD-2-mediated miR-221/222 expression. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2013;2(6) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000376.e000376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Ward J. A., Esa N., Pidikiti R., et al. Circulating cell and plasma microRNA profiles differ between non-ST-segment and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Family Medicine & Medical Science Research. 2013;2(2, article 108) doi: 10.4172/2327-4972.1000108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Cardinalli B., Castellani L., Fasanaro P., et al. Microrna-221 and microrna-222 modulate differentiation and maturation of skeletal muscle cells. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007607.e7607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Hamrick M. W., Herberg S., Arounleut P., et al. The adipokine leptin increases skeletal muscle mass and significantly alters skeletal muscle miRNA expression profile in aged mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2010;400(3):379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.08.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Andreote A. P. D., Rosario M. F., Ledur M. C., et al. Identification and characterization of microRNAs expressed in chicken skeletal muscle. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2014;13(1):1465–1479. doi: 10.4238/2014.March.6.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Greco S., Perfetti A., Fasanaro P., et al. Deregulated microRNAs in myotonic dystrophy type 2. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039732.e39732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Feng H. J., Ouyang W., Liu J. H., et al. Global microRNA profiles and signaling pathways in the development of cardiac hypertrophy. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2014;47(5):361–368. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20142937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Hu S., Huang M., Nguyen P. K., et al. Novel MicroRNA prosurvival cocktail for improving engraftment and function of cardiac progenitor cell transplantation. Circulation. 2011;124(11):S27–S34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.017954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Yu B., Gong M., Wang Y., et al. Cardiomyocyte protection by GATA-4 gene engineered mesenchymal stem cells is partially mediated by translocation of miR-221 in microvesicles. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073304.e73304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Zhou X., Yuan P., He Y. Role of microRNAs in peripheral artery disease. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2012;6(4):695–700. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2012.978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Chistiakov D. A., Sobenin I. A., Orekhov A. N. Strategies to deliver microRNAs as potential therapeutics in the treatment of cardiovascular pathology. Drug Delivery. 2012;19(8):392–405. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2012.738436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Fernández-Hernando C., Baldán A. MicroRNAs and cardiovascular disease. Current Genetic Medicine Reports. 2013;1(1):30–38. doi: 10.1007/s40142-013-0008-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Imanishi T., Akasaka T. MicroRNAs in peripheral artery disease. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2013;13(13):1589–1595. doi: 10.2174/15680266113139990107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Toba H., Cortez D., Lindsey M. L., Chilton R. J. Applications of miRNA technology for atherosclerosis. Current Atherosclerosis Reports. 2014;16(2, ar) doi: 10.1007/s11883-013-0386-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Lu X., Kakkar V. The roles of microRNAs in atherosclerosis. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2014;21(13):1531–1543. doi: 10.2174/0929867321666131218100606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Gramantieri L., Fornari F., Callegari E., et al. MicroRNA involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma: microRNA review series. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2008;12(6A):2189–2204. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00533.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Nassirpour R., Mehta P. P., Baxi S. M., Yin M. J. miR-221 promotes tumorigenesis in human triple negative breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062170.e62170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 197.Lin Q., Mao W., Shu Y., et al. A cluster of specified microRNAs in peripheral blood as biomarkers for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer by stem-loop RT-PCR. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2012;138(1):85–93. doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-1068-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Sun K., Wang W., Zeng J.-J., Wu C.-T., Lei S.-T., Li G.-X. MicroRNA-221 inhibits CDKN1C/p57 expression in human colorectal carcinoma. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2011;32(3):375–384. doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Kim Y.-K., Yu J., Han T. S., et al. Functional links between clustered microRNAs: suppression of cell-cycle inhibitors by microRNA clusters in gastric cancer. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37(5):1672–1681. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Sarkar S., Dubaybo H., Ali S., et al. Down-regulation of miR-221 inhibits proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells through up-regulation of PTEN, p27(kip1), p57(kip2), and PUMA. American Journal of Cancer Research. 2013;3(5):465–477. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Howe E. N., Cochrane D. R., Richer J. K. The miR-200 and miR-221/222 microRNA families: opposing effects on epithelial identity. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 2012;17(1):65–77. doi: 10.1007/s10911-012-9244-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Fan Y.-L., Zheng M., Tang Y.-L., Liang X.-H. A new perspective of vasculogenic mimicry: EMT and cancer stem cells. Oncology Letters. 2013;6(5):1174–1180. doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Du J., Sun B., Zhao X., et al. Hypoxia promotes vasculogenic mimicry formation by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ovarian carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 2014;133(3):575–583. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Ehsan S. M., Welch-Reardon K. M., Waterman M. L., Hughes C. C. W., George S. C. A three-dimensional in vitro model of tumor cell intravasation. Integrative Biology (United Kingdom) 2014;6(6):603–610. doi: 10.1039/c3ib40170g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES