Skip to main content
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1996 Feb 1;15(3):590–597.

Inactivation of topoisomerases affects transcription-dependent chromatin transitions in rDNA but not in a gene transcribed by RNA polymerase II.

G Cavalli 1, D Bachmann 1, F Thoma 1
PMCID: PMC449977  PMID: 8599942

Abstract

Previous studies on a chromatin reporter gene (GAL-URARIB) in yeast showed that nucleosomes were maintained but rearranged during transcription in galactose, which was consistent with local dissociation of histones at the site of the RNA polymerase. Furthermore, repositioning of nucleosomes occurred rapidly after glucose repression. Because nucleosomal disruption and transcription produce topological changes in the chromatin substrate, the effect of topoisomerase activity was tested by the insertion of GAL-URABIB in topoisomerase mutant strains. The chromatin structure was analysed by nuclease digestion and psoralen crosslinking, and compared with that of the rDNA locus. In GAL-URARIB, neither the inactivation of topoisomerases I, II or I and II generated nucleosomal loss during transcription, nor was topoisomerase activity required for repositioning of the nucleosomes after repression. In contrast, the inactivation of topoisomerase I promoted an enhanced psoralen accessibility of the transcribed rDNA, possibly because of altered supercoiling, and the inactivation of topoisomerases I and II disrupted the chromatin structure of the whole rDNA locus by redistribution of the nucleosomes. The inactivation of topoisomerase II alone had no effect. These observations substantiate a differential participation of topoisomerases in the modulation of the chromatin structures of rDNA genes and of a single copy polymerase II gene. It is suggested that topological stress in genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II might diffuse away into flanking regions.

Full text

PDF
590

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Becker P. B. The establishment of active promoters in chromatin. Bioessays. 1994 Aug;16(8):541–547. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernardi F., Koller T., Thoma F. The ade6 gene of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has the same chromatin structure in the chromosome and in plasmids. Yeast. 1991 Aug-Sep;7(6):547–558. doi: 10.1002/yea.320070603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brill S. J., DiNardo S., Voelkel-Meiman K., Sternglanz R. Need for DNA topoisomerase activity as a swivel for DNA replication for transcription of ribosomal RNA. 1987 Mar 26-Apr 1Nature. 326(6111):414–416. doi: 10.1038/326414a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brill S. J., Sternglanz R. Transcription-dependent DNA supercoiling in yeast DNA topoisomerase mutants. Cell. 1988 Jul 29;54(3):403–411. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90203-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cavalli G., Thoma F. Chromatin transitions during activation and repression of galactose-regulated genes in yeast. EMBO J. 1993 Dec;12(12):4603–4613. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06149.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark D. J., Felsenfeld G. Formation of nucleosomes on positively supercoiled DNA. EMBO J. 1991 Feb;10(2):387–395. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07960.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conconi A., Sogo J. M., Ryan C. A. Ribosomal gene clusters are uniquely proportioned between open and closed chromatin structures in both tomato leaf cells and exponentially growing suspension cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 15;89(12):5256–5260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Conconi A., Widmer R. M., Koller T., Sogo J. M. Two different chromatin structures coexist in ribosomal RNA genes throughout the cell cycle. Cell. 1989 Jun 2;57(5):753–761. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90790-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dammann R., Lucchini R., Koller T., Sogo J. M. Chromatin structures and transcription of rDNA in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 May 25;21(10):2331–2338. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.10.2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DiNardo S., Voelkel K., Sternglanz R. DNA topoisomerase II mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: topoisomerase II is required for segregation of daughter molecules at the termination of DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(9):2616–2620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.9.2616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gartenberg M. R., Wang J. C. Positive supercoiling of DNA greatly diminishes mRNA synthesis in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 1;89(23):11461–11465. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Giaever G. N., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of intracellular DNA can occur in eukaryotic cells. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):849–856. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90140-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Han S., Udvardy A., Schedl P. Novobiocin blocks the Drosophila heat shock response. J Mol Biol. 1985 May 5;183(1):13–29. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90277-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jackson S., Brooks W., Jackson V. Dynamics of the interactions of histones H2A,H2B and H3,H4 with torsionally stressed DNA. Biochemistry. 1994 May 10;33(18):5392–5403. doi: 10.1021/bi00184a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jackson V. Influence of positive stress on nucleosome assembly. Biochemistry. 1993 Jun 8;32(22):5901–5912. doi: 10.1021/bi00073a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Keller W. Determination of the number of superhelical turns in simian virus 40 DNA by gel electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):4876–4880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kornberg R. D., Lorch Y. Interplay between chromatin structure and transcription. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;7(3):371–375. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80092-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee M. S., Garrard W. T. Positive DNA supercoiling generates a chromatin conformation characteristic of highly active genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9675–9679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lewin B. Chromatin and gene expression: constant questions, but changing answers. Cell. 1994 Nov 4;79(3):397–406. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90249-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu L. F., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. O'Donohue M. F., Duband-Goulet I., Hamiche A., Prunell A. Octamer displacement and redistribution in transcription of single nucleosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Mar 25;22(6):937–945. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.6.937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Oliver S. G., van der Aart Q. J., Agostoni-Carbone M. L., Aigle M., Alberghina L., Alexandraki D., Antoine G., Anwar R., Ballesta J. P., Benit P. The complete DNA sequence of yeast chromosome III. Nature. 1992 May 7;357(6373):38–46. doi: 10.1038/357038a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reeves R. Transcriptionally active chromatin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Sep 10;782(4):343–393. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(84)90044-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Reik A., Schütz G., Stewart A. F. Glucocorticoids are required for establishment and maintenance of an alteration in chromatin structure: induction leads to a reversible disruption of nucleosomes over an enhancer. EMBO J. 1991 Sep;10(9):2569–2576. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07797.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schmid A., Fascher K. D., Hörz W. Nucleosome disruption at the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction occurs in the absence of DNA replication. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):853–864. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90560-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schultz M. C., Brill S. J., Ju Q., Sternglanz R., Reeder R. H. Topoisomerases and yeast rRNA transcription: negative supercoiling stimulates initiation and topoisomerase activity is required for elongation. Genes Dev. 1992 Jul;6(7):1332–1341. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.7.1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Simpson R. T., Thoma F., Brubaker J. M. Chromatin reconstituted from tandemly repeated cloned DNA fragments and core histones: a model system for study of higher order structure. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):799–808. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90276-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sinden R. R., Carlson J. O., Pettijohn D. E. Torsional tension in the DNA double helix measured with trimethylpsoralen in living E. coli cells: analogous measurements in insect and human cells. Cell. 1980 Oct;21(3):773–783. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90440-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sogo J. M., Ness P. J., Widmer R. M., Parish R. W., Koller T. Psoralen-crosslinking of DNA as a probe for the structure of active nucleolar chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1984 Oct 5;178(4):897–919. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90318-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stewart A. F., Herrera R. E., Nordheim A. Rapid induction of c-fos transcription reveals quantitative linkage of RNA polymerase II and DNA topoisomerase I enzyme activities. Cell. 1990 Jan 12;60(1):141–149. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90724-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Studitsky V. M., Clark D. J., Felsenfeld G. A histone octamer can step around a transcribing polymerase without leaving the template. Cell. 1994 Jan 28;76(2):371–382. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90343-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wallrath L. L., Lu Q., Granok H., Elgin S. C. Architectural variations of inducible eukaryotic promoters: preset and remodeling chromatin structures. Bioessays. 1994 Mar;16(3):165–170. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wolffe A. P. Transcriptional activation. Switched-on chromatin. Curr Biol. 1994 Jun 1;4(6):525–528. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van Holde K. E., Lohr D. E., Robert C. What happens to nucleosomes during transcription? J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 15;267(5):2837–2840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES