Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1996 Feb 1;15(3):607–617.

A cycle of binding and release of the DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE chaperones regulates activity of the Escherichia coli heat shock transcription factor sigma32.

J Gamer 1, G Multhaup 1, T Tomoyasu 1, J S McCarty 1, S Rüdiger 1, H J Schönfeld 1, C Schirra 1, H Bujard 1, B Bukau 1
PMCID: PMC449979  PMID: 8599944

Abstract

The chaperone system formed by DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE mediates stress-dependent negative modulation of the Escherichia coli heat shock response, probably through association with the heat shock promoter-specific sigma32 subunit of RNA polymerase. Interactions of the DnaK system with sigma32 were analysed. DnaJ and DnaK bind free, but not RNA polymerase-bound, sigma32 with dissociation constants of 20 nM and 5 muM respectively. Association and dissociation rates of DnaJ-sigma32 complexes are 5900- and 20-fold higher respectively than those of DnaK-sigma32 complexes in the absence of ATP. ATP destabilizes DnaK-sigma32 interactions. DnaJ, through rapid association with sigma32 and stimulation of hydrolysis of DnaK-bound ATP, mediates efficient binding of DnaK to sigma32 in the presence of ATP, resulting in DnaK-DnaJ-sigma32 complexes containing ADP. GrpE binding to these complexes stimulates nucleotide release and subsequent complex dissociation by ATP. We propose that the principles of this cycle also operate in other chaperone activities of the DnaK system. DnaK and DnaJ cooperatively inhibit sigma32 activity in heat shock gene transcription and GrpE partially reverses this inhibition. These data indicate that reversible inhibition of sigma32 activity through transient association of DnaK and DnaJ is a central regulatory element of the heat shock response.

Full text

PDF
607

Images in this article

610Image
on p.610
611Image
on p.611
612Image
on p.612
613Image
on p.613
613Image
on p.613

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buchberger A., Schröder H., Büttner M., Valencia A., Bukau B. A conserved loop in the ATPase domain of the DnaK chaperone is essential for stable binding of GrpE. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Feb;1(2):95–101. doi: 10.1038/nsb0294-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchberger A., Theyssen H., Schröder H., McCarty J. S., Virgallita G., Milkereit P., Reinstein J., Bukau B. Nucleotide-induced conformational changes in the ATPase and substrate binding domains of the DnaK chaperone provide evidence for interdomain communication. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 14;270(28):16903–16910. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.28.16903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchberger A., Valencia A., McMacken R., Sander C., Bukau B. The chaperone function of DnaK requires the coupling of ATPase activity with substrate binding through residue E171. EMBO J. 1994 Apr 1;13(7):1687–1695. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06433.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bujard H., Gentz R., Lanzer M., Stueber D., Mueller M., Ibrahimi I., Haeuptle M. T., Dobberstein B. A T5 promoter-based transcription-translation system for the analysis of proteins in vitro and in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:416–433. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55028-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bukau B. Regulation of the Escherichia coli heat-shock response. Mol Microbiol. 1993 Aug;9(4):671–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01727.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Craig E. A., Gross C. A. Is hsp70 the cellular thermometer? Trends Biochem Sci. 1991 Apr;16(4):135–140. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90055-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gamer J., Bujard H., Bukau B. Physical interaction between heat shock proteins DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE and the bacterial heat shock transcription factor sigma 32. Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):833–842. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90294-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grossman A. D., Straus D. B., Walter W. A., Gross C. A. Sigma 32 synthesis can regulate the synthesis of heat shock proteins in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 1987 Apr;1(2):179–184. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.2.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ha J. H., McKay D. B. ATPase kinetics of recombinant bovine 70 kDa heat shock cognate protein and its amino-terminal ATPase domain. Biochemistry. 1994 Dec 6;33(48):14625–14635. doi: 10.1021/bi00252a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hendrick J. P., Hartl F. U. Molecular chaperone functions of heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:349–384. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.002025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herman C., Thévenet D., D'Ari R., Bouloc P. Degradation of sigma 32, the heat shock regulator in Escherichia coli, is governed by HflB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 11;92(8):3516–3520. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Landry S. J., Jordan R., McMacken R., Gierasch L. M. Different conformations for the same polypeptide bound to chaperones DnaK and GroEL. Nature. 1992 Jan 30;355(6359):455–457. doi: 10.1038/355455a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liberek K., Galitski T. P., Zylicz M., Georgopoulos C. The DnaK chaperone modulates the heat shock response of Escherichia coli by binding to the sigma 32 transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 15;89(8):3516–3520. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liberek K., Georgopoulos C. Autoregulation of the Escherichia coli heat shock response by the DnaK and DnaJ heat shock proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1;90(23):11019–11023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.11019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liberek K., Marszalek J., Ang D., Georgopoulos C., Zylicz M. Escherichia coli DnaJ and GrpE heat shock proteins jointly stimulate ATPase activity of DnaK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 1;88(7):2874–2878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liberek K., Wall D., Georgopoulos C. The DnaJ chaperone catalytically activates the DnaK chaperone to preferentially bind the sigma 32 heat shock transcriptional regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 3;92(14):6224–6228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lowe P. A., Hager D. A., Burgess R. R. Purification and properties of the sigma subunit of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Biochemistry. 1979 Apr 3;18(7):1344–1352. doi: 10.1021/bi00574a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Malmqvist M. Biospecific interaction analysis using biosensor technology. Nature. 1993 Jan 14;361(6408):186–187. doi: 10.1038/361186a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McCarty J. S., Buchberger A., Reinstein J., Bukau B. The role of ATP in the functional cycle of the DnaK chaperone system. J Mol Biol. 1995 May 26;249(1):126–137. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Palleros D. R., Reid K. L., Shi L., Welch W. J., Fink A. L. ATP-induced protein-Hsp70 complex dissociation requires K+ but not ATP hydrolysis. Nature. 1993 Oct 14;365(6447):664–666. doi: 10.1038/365664a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schmid D., Baici A., Gehring H., Christen P. Kinetics of molecular chaperone action. Science. 1994 Feb 18;263(5149):971–973. doi: 10.1126/science.8310296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schröder H., Langer T., Hartl F. U., Bukau B. DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE form a cellular chaperone machinery capable of repairing heat-induced protein damage. EMBO J. 1993 Nov;12(11):4137–4144. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06097.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schönfeld H. J., Schmidt D., Schröder H., Bukau B. The DnaK chaperone system of Escherichia coli: quaternary structures and interactions of the DnaK and GrpE components. J Biol Chem. 1995 Feb 3;270(5):2183–2189. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.5.2183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Straus D. B., Walter W. A., Gross C. A. The activity of sigma 32 is reduced under conditions of excess heat shock protein production in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 1989 Dec;3(12A):2003–2010. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.12a.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Straus D. B., Walter W. A., Gross C. A. The heat shock response of E. coli is regulated by changes in the concentration of sigma 32. Nature. 1987 Sep 24;329(6137):348–351. doi: 10.1038/329348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Straus D., Walter W., Gross C. A. DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE heat shock proteins negatively regulate heat shock gene expression by controlling the synthesis and stability of sigma 32. Genes Dev. 1990 Dec;4(12A):2202–2209. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.12a.2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Szabo A., Langer T., Schröder H., Flanagan J., Bukau B., Hartl F. U. The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 25;91(22):10345–10349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tilly K., Spence J., Georgopoulos C. Modulation of stability of the Escherichia coli heat shock regulatory factor sigma. J Bacteriol. 1989 Mar;171(3):1585–1589. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.3.1585-1589.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tomoyasu T., Gamer J., Bukau B., Kanemori M., Mori H., Rutman A. J., Oppenheim A. B., Yura T., Yamanaka K., Niki H. Escherichia coli FtsH is a membrane-bound, ATP-dependent protease which degrades the heat-shock transcription factor sigma 32. EMBO J. 1995 Jun 1;14(11):2551–2560. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07253.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wall D., Zylicz M., Georgopoulos C. The NH2-terminal 108 amino acids of the Escherichia coli DnaJ protein stimulate the ATPase activity of DnaK and are sufficient for lambda replication. J Biol Chem. 1994 Feb 18;269(7):5446–5451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wall D., Zylicz M., Georgopoulos C. The conserved G/F motif of the DnaJ chaperone is necessary for the activation of the substrate binding properties of the DnaK chaperone. J Biol Chem. 1995 Feb 3;270(5):2139–2144. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.5.2139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wawrzynów A., Zylicz M. Divergent effects of ATP on the binding of the DnaK and DnaJ chaperones to each other, or to their various native and denatured protein substrates. J Biol Chem. 1995 Aug 18;270(33):19300–19306. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.33.19300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yura T., Nagai H., Mori H. Regulation of the heat-shock response in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993;47:321–350. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zylicz M., Yamamoto T., McKittrick N., Sell S., Georgopoulos C. Purification and properties of the dnaJ replication protein of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jun 25;260(12):7591–7598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES