Skip to main content
IMA Fungus logoLink to IMA Fungus
. 2015 Jun 1;6(1):135–143. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.01.08

Harorepupu aotearoa (Onygenales) gen. sp. nov.; a threatened fungus from shells of Powelliphanta and Paryphanta snails (Rhytididae)

Peter R Johnston 1,, Hai DT Nguyen 2, Duckchul Park 1, Yuuri Hirooka 2,3
PMCID: PMC4500079  PMID: 26203419

Abstract

A cleistothecial fungus, known only from the shells of giant land snails of the family Rhytidae, is described as a new genus and species within Onygenales, Harorepupu aotearoa gen. sp. nov. Known only from the sexual morph, this fungus is characterized morphologically by a membranous ascoma with no appendages and ascospores with a sparse network of ridges. Ribosomal DNA sequences place the new species within Onygenales, but comparison with the known genetic diversity within the order linked it to no existing genus or family. It is the first species of Onygenales reported from the shells of terrestrial snails. This fungus has been listed as Critically Endangered in New Zealand and has been previously referred to as ‘Trichocomaceae gen. nov.’ in those threat lists.

Keywords: Gastropoda, snail shell, phylogeny, Trichocomaceae, Gondwana

INTRODUCTION

Few fungi have been reported from the shells of terrestrial snails compared to aquatic snails (Říhová et al. 2014). In a survey of fungi associated with empty shells of Cepaea hortensis, Říhová et al. (2014) reported 27 species, mostly common soil fungi. They found few potentially keratinolytic species and concluded that the fungi they detected were likely to be accidental colonisers rather than specialist shell decomposing fungi. Snail shells have a layer of calcium carbonate covering a core of conchiolin, a keratin-like compound very resistant to decay (Ormsby et al. 2006, Goffer 2007).

Říhová et al. (2014) mentioned a report on the NZFungi database (http://nzfungi2.landcareresearch.co.nz/) of a species of Trichocomaceae reported from shells of Powelliphanta and Paryphanta species in New Zealand. These snails are members of the family Rhytididae (Mollusca; Gastropoda; Pulmonata), the thick shells of which are composed almost entirely of conchiolin with only thin outer layers of calcium carbonate (Ormsby et al. 2006). Hitchmough (2002) listed this fungus as ‘Undescribed genus, Trichocomaceae’ and accorded it a Nationally Critical threat status. The same fungus has been mentioned in Department of Conservation reports (e.g. Anon. 2007, Miller & Holland 2008).

The tentative NZFungi identification of the fungus on Powelliphanta and Paryphanta as Trichocomaceae was based on the macroscopic appearance of the ascomata and ascospore morphology. An asexual morph has not been observed. Trichocomaceae is a family in Eurotiales, some species of which have sexual morphs similar to those of Onygenales, the two orders being most easily distinguished morphologically by their asexual morphs (Currah 1994). Currah (1994) notes that amongst these fungi, the keratin degrading species are restricted to the families Onygenaceae and Arthrodermataceae within Onygenales. Of these two families, the fungus on Powelliphanta and Paryphanta is morphologically similar to Onygenaceae sensu Currah (1985). Two fungi reported from cultures derived from Cepaea shells by Říhová et al. (2014) were identified using DNA sequences as Onygenales, but the sequences for these are not available.

In this paper we describe the fungus associated with Powelliphanta and Paryphanta shells as a new genus within Onygenales incertae sedis, its phylogenetic position being based on SSU, ITS and LSU sequences. We compare it with the known genetic diversity within the order.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Morphology

Fungarium specimens were rehydrated in 3 % KOH and the hymenial elements examined microscopically in either 3 % KOH or 3 % KOH mixed with Lugol’s iodine solution. Vertical sections were cut at a thickness of about 10 μm using a freezing microtome and mounted in lactic acid. Material for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was obtained by placing a mass of dried ascospores onto carbon tape on a stub, then sputter coating with gold. Photomicrographs taken on a Jeol Neoscope JCM-5000 (Landcare Research). Specimens have been deposited in PDD.

Molecular analyses

For DNA extraction, three separate extractions were done from three different ascomata from PDD 105262. DNA was extracted and amplified using a REDExtract-N-Amp Plant PCR Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol except that the ascomata were ground in 30 μL extraction solution with a plastic pestle. Amplification primers for ITS were ITS1F and ITS4 (White et al. 1990; Gardes & Bruns 1993), for LSU were LR0R and LR5 (Bunyard et al. 1994; Vilgalys & Hester 1990), and for SSU were NS1 and NS4 (White et al. 1990).

Additional sequence data of SSU, LSU and ITS were downloaded from GenBank (Table 1). Sequences of each gene were aligned with MAFFT 7.122b (Katoh & Standley 2013) and trimmed with BioEdit (Hall 1999). Alignments were deposited in TreeBASE (www.treebase.org/treebase/), study accession number 17085. Molecular phylogenies were constructed using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML). To select the most appropriate model of sequence evolution, jmodeltest 2.1.1 (Darriba et al. 2012; Guindon & Gascuel 2003) was applied on each alignment (ITS, SSU, LSU). The GTR + I + G model was selected for ITS, SSU, and LSU according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The SSU and LSU matrices were concatenated with SeaView (Gouy et al. 2010). BI analyses were performed with MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003). Three independent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs were performed simultaneously. Each MCMC ran for 3 x 106 generations for the SSU+LSU analysis and the ITS analysis, sampling every 500 generations until convergence (standard deviation of split frequency < 0.01). The first 25 % of trees were discarded as burn-in while the remaining trees combined with a 50 % majority rule consensus. ML analyses were performed with phyML 3.0 (Guidon et al. 2010) running inside SeaView (Gouy et al. 2010) with the following options: GTR model; aLRT branch support; empirical nucleotide equilibrium frequencies; optimized invariable site; optimized across site rate variation with 8 rate categories; NNI tree searching operations; BioNJ starting tree with optimized tree topology.

Table 1.

Species, culture, or voucher numbers, and GenBank accession numbers of isolates used in the phylogenetic analyses.

Genus and species Strain Number 18S 28S ITS
Roccellographa cretacea AFTOL-ID 93 DQ883705 DQ883696
Dendrographa decolorans DUKE 47570 NG_013155 NG_027622
Ramularia endophylla AFTOL-ID 942 = CBS 113265 DQ471017 DQ470968
Dothidea insculpta CBS 189.58 = AFTOL-ID 921 NG_016493 NG_027643
Arachnomyces glareosus CBS 116129 FJ358341 FJ358273
Arachnomyces kanei UAMH 5908 AF525308
Arachnomyces minimus CBS 324.70 FJ358342 FJ358274
Capronia pilosella AFTOL-ID 657 DQ823106 DQ823099
Cyphellophora laciniata AFTOL-ID 1033 EF413618 EF413619
Exophiala pisciphila AFTOL-ID 669 DQ823108 DQ823101
Caliciopsis orientalis AFTOL-ID 1911 = CBS 658.74 DQ471039 DQ470987
Caliciopsis pinea AFTOL-ID 1869 DQ678043 DQ678097
Monascus purpureus AFTOL-ID 426 DQ782881 DQ782908
Xeromyces bisporus CBS 236.71 FJ358355 FJ358291
Byssochlamys nivea CBS 100.11 FJ358345 FJ358279
Penicillium javanicum AFTOL-ID 429 EF413620 EF413621
Aspergillus amstelodami DAOM 222011 = ATCC 16464 = CBS 518.65 JN938999 JN938912 JN942872
Chaenothecopsis savonica Tibell 15876 U86691 AY796000
Mycocalicium polyporaeum ZWGeo60Clark AY789361 AY789362
Stenocybe pullatula Tibell 17117 U86692 AY796008
Sphinctrina turbinata AFTOL-ID 1721 EF413631 EF413632
Ajellomyces capsulatus ATCC 26032 AF320009
Ajellomyces capsulatus CBS 136.72 AB176497
Ajellomyces capsulatus UAMH 7141 AF038353
Ajellomyces dermatitidis ATCC 18187 AY176704
Ajellomyces grisea CBS 128.88 = UAMH 5409 AB075361
Ajellomyces grisea UAMH 6836 AY176721 AY527404
Histoplasma capsulatum var. duboisii H147 AB055247
Arthroderma ciferrii AFTOL-ID 428 EF413624 EF413625
Arthroderma racemosum UAMH 3367 = ATCC 18910 = CBS 423.74 = IMI 135822 HQ825139
Ctenomyces serratus CBS 187.61 FJ358347 FJ358282 AJ877222
Epidermophyton floccosum CBS 230.76 Z34923
Keratinomyces ceretanicus CBS 269.89 AJ877224
Microsporum audouinii CBS 109478 GU733362
Microsporum audouinii ATCC 10216 EF078482
Microsporum ferrugineum CBS 427.63 AJ252336
Trichophyton equinum CBS 112198 EF043275
Trichophyton rubrum CBS 118892 JX431933 JX431933
Trichophyton rubrum UAMH 8547 AF170471
Ascosphaera apis CBS 402.96 FJ358343 FJ358275
Ascosphaera apis ATCC MYA-4451 FJ172293
Ascosphaera colubrina CBS 160.87 FJ358344 FJ358276 U68320
Ascosphaera duoformis ARSEF 5140 HQ540518
Ascosphaera subglobosa A.A. Wynns 5004 HQ540517
Ascosphaera subglobosa DAOM 188973 HQ540521
Eremascus albus CBS 975.69 FJ358348 FJ358283
Arachniotus littoralis CBS 454.73 FJ358340 FJ358272
Arachniotus ruber UAMH 3543 AY177296
Gymnascella aurantiaca CBS 655.71 AB015772 AB040684
Gymnoascus confluens IMI 100873 = UAMH 3565 AJ315837
Gymnoascus desertorum CBS 634.72 AJ315838
Gymnoascus petalosporus CBS 252.72 = UAMH 1712 AB015773 AB040685
Gymnoascus reesii CBS 259.61 FJ358349 FJ358284
Kraurogymnocarpa trochleospora CBS 591.71 = ATCC 18900 =UAMH 10101 AB075344 KF477238
Rollandina hyalinospora CBS 548.72 = UAMH 3155 = NRRL 2881 AB015775 AB040687
Nannizziopsis barbata UAMH 11185 JF323871
Nannizziopsis hominis UAMH 7859 KF477215
Nannizziopsis infrequens UAMH 10417 AY744467
Nannizziopsis obscura UAMH 5875 KF466865
Nannizziopsis vriesii UAMH 3527 KF477198
Nannizziopsis vriesii ATCC 22444 = UAMH 3713 = CBS 407.71 = IMI 149994 AY304510 AY176715
Paranannizziopsis californiensis UAMH 10693 KF466867
Paranannizziopsis crustacea UAMH 10199 KF466868
Onygena equina TU101989 UNITE-UDB018096
“Paracoccidioides” sp. No name HQ413323
Amaurascopsis perforata FMR 5489 AJ315171
Amaurascopsis reticulata IFO 9196 AJ271434
Amaurascopsis reticulata CBS 392.61 AJ271418
Amauroascus aureus ATCC 18654 = = CBS 593.71 = NRRL 12,184 = UAMH 3157 AY176705
Amauroascus mutatus CBS 181.70 AJ271567
Amauroascus niger IFO 32599 = ATCC 22339 = UAMH 3544 AJ133434
Aphanoascella galapagosensis UAMH 11703 JQ864082 JQ864081
Aphanoascus arxii CBS 466.88 AJ315843
Aphanoascus foetidus CBS 452.75 AJ439448
Aphanoascus fulvescens NBRC 31723 = ATCC 36140 = IFO 31723 JN941600 JN941548
Aphanoascus reticulisporus IMI 336466 AJ439441
Apinisia graminicola CBS 721.68 AB015781 AY176709
Apinisia racovitzae CBS 151.65 AJ271429
Arachnotheca glomerata CBS 348.71 AB075352
Ascocalvatia alveolata ATCC 22147 = CBS 777.70 = UAMH 6475 AY176710
Auxarthron reticulatum UAMH 2006 AJ271568
Auxarthron umbrinum UAMH 3952 AY177309
Auxarthron zuffianum CBS 219.58 AY176712
Auxarthronopsis bandhavgarhensis NFCCI 2185 = CBS 134524 JQ048939 JQ048938 HQ164436
Byssoonygena ceratinophila ATCC 64724 = FMR 785 AB075353
Chlamydosauromyces punctatus UAMH 9990 AY177297
Chrysosporium parvum UAMH 1067 U29390
Coccidioides immitis ATCC 7366 AY176713
Coccidioides immitis CBS 166.51 EF186783
Coccidioides posadasii IFM 4935 AB232883
Emmonsia crescens UAMH 3008 AF038334
Emmonsia parva UAMH 130 AF038333
Emmonsia pasteuriana UAMH 9510 EF592152
Emmonsia sp. UAMH 10539 EF592156
Emmonsia sp. UAMH 7101 EF592154
Emmonsia sp. FDBC2 JQ247333
Kuehniella aurea CBS 593.71 AB075360
Lacazia loboi No name AF238301
Malbranchea cinnamomea CBS 960.72 GU733363
Malbranchea cinnamomea CBS 343.55 JQ067912 JQ067903
Malbranchea dendritica UAMH 2731 = ATCC 34527 = CBS 131.77 = IMI 211199 = NCMH 367 AY124496
Malbranchea gypsea IFM 47365 AB359425
Onygena equina ATCC 22731 = IFO 31785 = CBS 947.70 AY176717
Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola UAMH 6642 KF466869
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis R-2878 AF227151
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis Pb18 AF322389
Polytolypa hystricis UAMH 7299 AY176718 AY527405
Harorepupu aotearoa PDD 105262 KP683351 KP683349 KP683350
Renispora flavissima UAMH 4140 = ATCC 38503 U29393 AY176719
Uncinocarpus queenslandicus IFM 47370 AB361646
Uncinocarpus reesii UAMH 160 L27991
Uncinocarpus reesii ATCC 34533 = UAMH 3880 = CBS 121.77 AY176724
Uncinocarpus reesii UAMH3881 = ATCC 34534 = CBS 120.77 JF451137
Pseudospiromastix tentaculata CBS 184.92 AB075362 AY176722 AY527406
Spiromastix asexualis UTHSC DI-13-1 KJ880031 KJ880032
Spiromastix princeps IMI 169642 AJ315840
Spiromastix warcupii AFTOL-ID 430 DQ782882 DQ782909 DQ782848
Pyrgillus javanicus AFTOL-ID 342 DQ823110 DQ823103
Granulopyrenis seawardii CBS 109025 = AFTOL-ID 2013 EF411059 EF411062
Dermatocarpon luridum AFTOL-ID 2277 EF689833 EF643750
Placidiopsis cinerascens AFTOL-ID 2284 EF689842 EF643759
Polyblastia melaspora AFTOL-ID 1356 EF689854 EF643770
Geoglossum nigritum AFTOL-ID 56 AY544694 AY544650
Trichoglossum hirsutum AFTOL-ID 64 AY544697 AY544653
Cladonia caroliniana AFTOL-ID 3 AY584664 AY584640
Lecanora concolor VR 2-IX-00/17 AY640993 AY640954
Mitrula elegans WZGeo47Clark AY789334 AY789335
Pseudogymnoascus pannorum var. pannorum CBS 108.14 AB015785 AB040703
Thelebolus ellipsoideus AFTOL-ID 5005 FJ176840 FJ176895
Myriodontium keratinophilum DUMC 134.08 EU925387
Myriodontium keratinophilum MEA-B4-D JX869561
Ascobolus crenulatus AFTOL-ID 181 AY544721 AY544678
Hypocrea americana AFTOL-ID 52 AY544693 AY544649
Chaetomium globosum 15-5973 AY545725 AY545729
Xylaria hypoxylon spat03-03 AY544692 NG_027599

TAXONOMY

Harorepupu P.R. Johnst., H.D.T. Nguyen, D.C. Park, & Hirooka, gen. nov.

MycoBank MB811561

Etymology: From the Māori words harore = fungus, and pûpû = snail (fem.).

Diagnosis: Ascomata globose, sessile, membranous, solitary or in small, confluent groups; asci subclavate, wall undifferentiated; ascospores hyaline, oblong-elliptic, ornamentated with anastomosing ridges.

Type: Harorepupu aotearoa P.R. Johnst. et al. 2015.

Harorepupu aotearoa P.R. Johnst., H.D.T. Nguyen, D.C. Park, & Hirooka, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB811562

(Fig. 1)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Harorepupu aotearoa. A. Ascomata on shell, arrows indicate groups of ascomata on host shell (PDD 105262). B. Detail from A. C. Ascoma with wall breaking to expose powdery mass of yellow spores inside (PDD 74629). D. Asci in 3 % KOH plus Lugols iodine (PDD 74629). E. Ascomatal wall in vertical section (PDD 89035). F. Surface of ascoma (PDD 105262). G–I. Ascospores under light microscope, at three planes of focus (PDD 105262). J. Ascospores under SEM (PDD 105262). Bars: A, B = 10 mm; C = 0.5 mm; D, G–J = 10 μm; E–F = 20 μm.

Etymology: The species epithet is from the Māori word for the country of origin.

Diagnosis: Ascomata 0.8–1.2 mm diam, white to pale yellow; asci 13–16 × 7.5–8.5 μm, 8-spored; ascospores 4.2–5.4 × 2–3.1 μm (average 4.8 × 2.6 μm), oblong-elliptic, ends rounded, sparse network of narrow, ridge-like ornamentations.

Type: New Zealand: Nelson: Golden Bay, Wainui Falls Tr., on empty shell of Powelliphanta sp., 16 May 2014, P.R. Johnston FUNNZ 2014/0999 (PDD 105262 – holotype).

Description: Ascomata 0.8–1.2 mm diam, globose, sessile, membranous, surface slightly woolly but with no distinctive appendages, white to pale yellow; Opening by irregular cracks, revealing the dry, powdery, bright yellow spore masses inside; wall 80–100 μm thick, comprising tightly tangled hyphae 4–6 μm diam, walls thin, mostly hyaline, outer 3–4 rows of cells sometimes with pale yellow walls; outermost layers of hyphae sometimes with ends free; peridial appendages lacking. Asci 13–16 × 7.5–8.5 μm, clavate with a narrow, foot-like base and rounded apex, wall thin, undifferentiated, 8-spored, contents orange-brown in Lugol’s iodine. Ascospores 4.0–5.5 × 2–3 μm (average 4.8 × 2.6 μm), oblong-elliptic, ends rounded, ornamented with sparse network of narrow, anastomosing ridges, hyaline to pale yellow, 0-septate. Asexual morph not seen.

Additional specimens examined: New Zealand: Nelson: vic. Karamea, Kohaihai, Nikau Walk, on empty shell of Powelliphanta sp., 11 May 1994, P.R. Johnston (PDD 74629); vic. Karamea, Oparara Basin, Moria Gate Track, on empty shell of Powelliphanta sp., 10 May 2006. T. Atkinson FUNNZ 2006/1066 (PDD 92048); vic. Westport, Charming Creek Walkway, on empty shell of Powelliphanta sp., 10 May 2006 A. Wilson FUNNZ 2006/0160 (PDD 89035). Northland: Waipoua Forest, on empty shell of Paryphanta sp., 2001, E. Horak, (PDD 74625).

RESULTS

DNA sequences from all three ascomata from PDD 105262 were identical. They have been accessioned as GenBank KP683349, KP683350, and KP683351.

Phylogenetic analyses with the combined SSU + LSU sequences was performed to determine the higher taxonomic placement of Harorepupu aotearoa. After removing ambiguously aligned regions, SSU and LSU alignments were both 1300 base pairs long and contained a total of 257 (20 %) and 421 (32 %) parsimony informative characters respectively. Both the BI analysis (Fig. 2) and ML analysis (not shown) placed H. aotearoa in an isolated position in Onygenales. To determine whether we could place it in a well-supported family in Onygenales, we then performed phylogenetic analyses of the ITS region, with an alignment of 876 base pairs in length that contained 456 (52 %) parsimony informative characters. H. aotearoa is sister to Nannizziopsiaceae but lacking strong statistical support, where the aLRT branch support was only 0.74 in the ML analysis (data not shown) and the posterior probability is only 0.58 in the BI analysis (Fig. 3). All phylogenetic analyses show that H. aotearoa represents an isolated lineage within Onygenales.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

50 % majority rule consensus tree from Bayesian inference analysis of SSU and LSU sequences. Posterior probabilities greater than 0.7 shown above the edges. Taxa labelled EX are represented by sequences from ex-type cultures; bold type indicates the type species of genera.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

50 % majority rule consensus tree from Bayesian inference analysis of ITS sequences. Posterior probabilities greater than 0.7 shown above the edges. Taxa labelled EX are represented by sequences from ex-type cultures; bold type indicates the type species of genera.

DISCUSSION

Although Harorepupu aotearoa has never been grown on artificial media, we obtained DNA sequence data from dried specimens. Our comprehensive LSU and SSU phylogenetic tree showthat this fungus is a member of Onygenales and that is distantly related from any recognized onygenalean fungi. In our ITS tree, H. aotearoa was sister to the Nannizziopsiaceae clade but with low support in the BI analysis. The family Nannizziopsiaceae was described by Stchigel et al. (2013) on the basis of D1/D2 phylogenetic data, host range, morphology, and colony odour. Based on sexual morphology, historically taxonomically important for the group, species in Nannizziopsiaceae differ from our fungus in having ascomata with peridial appendages and ascospores that appear smooth under the light microscope (Currah 1985). The future discovery of additional species of Harorepupu, and of any asexual morph, could help clarify its position within the order. For now, however, we prefer to treat it as incertae sedis within the order rather than introduce a new family name for this single genus.

The biology of Harorepupu aotearoa is not understood, but as all collections are on empty shells of members of the family Rhytididae, it may be restricted to this substrate. If this is the case, threats to the snail population will present a threat to the fungus population. At present, with increased predation and disturbance resulting in larger numbers of dead Rhytididae shells on the forest floor, this fungus may temporarily be more common than usual.

Members of the family Rhytididae are distributed across many regions linked geologically to Gondwana. Although Harorepupu is at present known only from New Zealand, additional material, and perhaps more species, may be expected on the shells of these snails in other regions.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The Department of Conservation is thanked for allowing specimens to be collected in reserves that they manage, and the FUNNZ New Zealand Fungal Foray is thanked for facilitating the provision of specimens. Birgit Rhode (Landcare Research) is thanked for the SEM. Shaun Pennycook and Jessica Beever provided advice regarding the new names. P.R.J.and D.P. were supported through the Landcare Research Systematics Portfolio, with Core funding from the Science and Innovation Group of the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.

REFERENCES

  1. Anon (2007)Protecting our Places. Information about the Statement of National Priorities for Protecting Rare and Threatened Biodiversity on Private Land. [Publication No. ME805.] Wellington: Ministry for the Environment. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bunyard BA, Nicholson MS, Royse DJ. (1994) A systematic assessment of Morchella using RFLP analysis of the 28S ribosomal RNA gene. Mycologia 86: 762–772. [Google Scholar]
  3. Currah RS. (1985) Taxonomy of the Onygenales: Arthodermataceae, Gymnoascaceae, Myxotrichaceae and Onygenaceae. Mycotaxon 24: 1–216. [Google Scholar]
  4. Currah RS. (1994) Peridial morphology and evolution in the prototunicate ascomycetes. In: Ascomycete Systematics: problems and perspectives in the nineties (Hawksworth DL, ed.): 281–293. [NATO ASI Series A, vol. 269.] New York: Plenum Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedman CS, Grindley R, Keogh JA. (1997)Isolation of a fungus from shell lesions of New Zealand abalone, Haliotis iris Martyn and H. australis Gmelin. Molluscan Research 18: 313–324. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gardes M, Bruns TD. (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecolog 2: 113–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goffer Z. (2007) Archaeological Chemistry. 2nd edn [Chemical Analysis vol. 170.] Hoboken, NJ: Wiley InterScience. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. (2010) SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 221–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guindon S, Gascuel O. (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. (2010)New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307–e321.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall TA. (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hitchmough R. (2002) New Zealand Threat Classiӿcation System Lists 2002. [Threatened Species Occasional Publication no. 23.] Wellington: Department of Conservation. [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller N, Holland W. (2008) Natural areas of Tutamoe Ecological District: reconnaissance survey report for the Protected Natural Areas Programme.Northland: Department of Conservation. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ormsby M, Johnson JS, Heald S, Chang L, Bosworth J. (2006) Investigation of solid phase microextraction sampling for organic pesticide residues on museum collections. Collection Forum 20: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  16. Říhová D, Janovský Z, Koukol O. (2014) Fungal communities colonising empty Cepaea hortensis shells differ according to litter type. Fungal Ecology 8: 66–71. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stchigel AM, Sutton DA, Cano-Lira JF, Cabañes FJ, Abarca L, Tintelnot K, Wickes BL, García D, Guarro J. (2013) Phylogeny of chrysosporia infecting reptiles: proposal of the new family Nannizziopsiaceae and five new species. Persoonia 31: 86–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. (1990) Amplification of direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications (Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds): 315–322. San Diego: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]

Articles from IMA Fungus are provided here courtesy of The International Mycological Association

RESOURCES