Significance
Combined Fe- and Nd-isotope signatures suggest that banded iron formations (BIFs) contain a major component of continentally derived iron that was mobilized by microbial iron reduction followed by transport through an iron shuttle to the site of BIF formation in deep basin environments. This Fe source is in addition to the widely accepted submarine hydrothermal source of Fe in BIFs, and the two sources of Fe may be comparable in importance, although their proportions change over time dependent on basin-scale circulation.
Keywords: BIF, DIR, iron shuttle, Nd isotope, Fe isotope
Abstract
Banded iron formations (BIFs) record a time of extensive Fe deposition in the Precambrian oceans, but the sources and pathways for metals in BIFs remain controversial. Here, we present Fe- and Nd-isotope data that indicate two sources of Fe for the large BIF units deposited 2.5 billion y ago. High-εNd and -δ56Fe signatures in some BIF samples record a hydrothermal component, but correlated decreases in εNd- and δ56Fe values reflect contributions from a continental component. The continental Fe source is best explained by Fe mobilization on the continental margin by microbial dissimilatory iron reduction (DIR) and confirms for the first time, to our knowledge, a microbially driven Fe shuttle for the largest BIFs on Earth. Detailed sampling at various scales shows that the proportions of hydrothermal and continental Fe sources were invariant over periods of 100–103 y, indicating that there was no seasonal control, although Fe sources varied on longer timescales of 105–106 y, suggesting a control by marine basin circulation. These results show that Fe sources and pathways for BIFs reflect the interplay between abiologic (hydrothermal) and biologic processes, where the latter reflects DIR that operated on a basin-wide scale in the Archean.
Banded iron formations (BIFs) are Precambrian chemical marine sedimentary rocks that represent the major source of Fe used in today's society. Early studies suggested a continental source of Fe for BIFs (1, 2), although direct riverine input of Fe has been questioned because of the low-detritus components in the large superior-type BIFs (3). The discovery of midocean ridge (MOR) hydrothermal systems in the 1970s and the similarity of certain rare earth element (REE) signatures (e.g., positive Eu anomaly) between BIFs and MOR hydrothermal fluids led to a commonly accepted model, where BIFs were formed by oxidation of hydrothermally sourced aqueous Fe(II) (4–9). More recent work, particularly the combination of Nd isotopes and REEs, suggests a more complex origin for REEs in BIFs, where a significant component is sourced to the continents (10–14). Interpretations of Fe sources for BIFs using REE patterns and Nd-isotope ratios are, however, based on the underlying assumption that REEs and Fe pathways were coupled during transport and deposition of materials for BIFs, although this assumption has not been independently tested.
Deposition of BIFs requires the ancient oceans to be sufficiently reduced to allow transport of large quantities of aqueous Fe(II) but additionally, allow an oxidizing step to form insoluble Fe(III) oxides/hydroxides, and this combination indicates that BIFs likely record a vigorous Fe redox cycle, which could induce significant Fe-isotope fractionation between ferric and ferrous phases or aqueous species (15). The pathways by which Fe is deposited as BIFs have been studied in detail using stable Fe isotopes, but no consensus exists for explaining the wide range in measured δ56Fe values (−2.5‰ to +1.5‰). Some studies have interpreted the negative δ56Fe values of BIFs to reflect partial oxidation of hydrothermal Fe(II) (6, 16, 17), whereas others have proposed that the negative δ56Fe values in BIFs reflect microbial dissimilatory iron reduction (DIR) in precursor BIF sediment before lithification (15, 18, 19). Difficulties in models that invoke partial oxidation of hydrothermal Fe(II) include the fact that only small quantities of Fe that has low-δ56Fe values are produced by such a process, which is problematic for explaining Fe-rich rocks, such as BIFs. The DIR model may explain small-scale Fe-isotope variability in BIFs (20), but local recycling of Fe by DIR cannot well explain the changes in δ56Fe values of BIFs on stratigraphic scales, unless a mechanism is found to transport large quantities of DIR-generated Fe on a basin-wide scale. An alternative mechanism to explain the low-δ56Fe values in Archean marine sedimentary rocks has been put forth by Severmann et al. (21) based on studies of microbially generated Fe in the modern Black Sea, where aqueous Fe(II) produced by DIR on the shelf is delivered to the deeper basin by an “iron shuttle”, trapped as sulfide, and precipitated as low-δ56Fe pyrite. Although the benthic microbial Fe shuttle focused on the origin of pyrite in Archean shales (21), it offers a possible model for explaining the low-δ56Fe superior-type BIFs.
Here, we address the question of Fe sources and pathways for BIFs by combining stable Fe isotopes with radiogenic Nd isotopes as well as REE measurements to test proposals that Fe in BIFs was hydrothermally sourced as well as evaluate proposals that a DIR-generated iron shuttle was important in BIF genesis. Radiogenic Nd-isotope ratios are used, because they are a sensitive discriminant of continental vs. oceanic sources but are not fractionated during deposition or dissolution of Fe oxides. Analysis of the first combined Fe–Nd-isotope dataset for BIFs, to our knowledge, leads us to a dual-source model for Fe in BIFs, including a hydrothermal component that has mantle-like Fe- and Nd-isotope signatures and a continental component that contains crustal Nd and isotopically light Fe derived from microbial iron shuttle. Our results confirm the arguments in previous REE and Nd-isotope work (10–13) that the Precambrian oceans were dynamic, where oscillations of ancient ocean environments caused secular changes in mixing ratios between hydrothermal and continental components.
Samples and Isotopic Results
We focus on the Dales Gorge member of the 2.5-gigaanum (Ga) age Brockman Iron Formation (Hamersley Basin, Western Australia, Australia), the world’s most extensive superior-type BIF that represents the climax of BIF deposition in the geologic record (6, 7). The BIF samples analyzed in this study come from the type section diamond drill core for the Dales Gorge member (22, 23) (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). The depositional age of the Dales Gorge member is between 2.50 and 2.45 Ga (24). The Dales Gorge member is ∼160- to 140-m thick, consisting of 17 iron-rich, meter-scale macrobands and 16 shale macrobands, named BIF0–BIF16 and S1–S16, respectively (Fig. 1), and preserved sections reflect deposition in deep water conditions. The meter-scale, iron-rich macrobands are each composed of centimeter-scale, iron-rich mesobands (Fig. 1), which in turn, contain numerous submillimeter microbands (22). Iron-isotope compositions were measured at various sample scales from bulk (∼300-mg samples) measurements on the same aliquot used for Nd and REE analysis by isotope dilution mass spectrometry for mesoband samples in different macrobands to in situ analysis of Fe-isotope ratios and REE contents using femtosecond laser ablation (20) for microbands (methods details are in Materials and Methods and SI Appendix). Measured Fe- and Nd-isotope compositions reveal a large variation in both isotope systems: from −0.83‰ to +1.30‰ in δ56Fe and −2.2 to +3.0 in εNd (Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Table S1). Between macrobands and within a macroband (e.g., BIF16), Fe- and Nd-isotope compositions oscillate over meter scales along the drill core (Fig. 1). In contrast, there is limited variation (<±0.2‰) in δ56Fe values among microbands over centimeter scales of drill core depth (Fig. 1). Overall, there is a broad positive correlation between the δ56Fe and εNd-values (Figs. 1 and 2).
Discussion
The spread in Nd-isotope compositions of the BIF samples cannot be explained by the effects of siliciclastic contamination or hydrothermal alteration/metamorphism. Aluminum contents measured on the same aliquot used for REE and Nd-isotope analysis are very low, generally less than 0.4 grams per 100 grams (wt.%) Al2O3 (exceptions are two samples at 0.6 and 1.4 wt.%) (SI Appendix, Table S1), and there is no correlation between Al contents and Nd-isotope compositions, indicating that the negative εNd-values do not reflect physical contamination with continental detritus. Previous Sm–Nd-isotope work on the Brockman Iron Formation suggested that secondary hydrothermal or metamorphic effects modified the Sm–Nd-isotope systematics after deposition (25). It is difficult, however, to envision a process at 2.1 Ga that homogenized 143Nd/144Nd ratios in BIF and shale samples at a stratigraphic scale but did not homogenize REE patterns, including 147Sm/144Nd ratios (Fig. 3). Although the Dales Gorge member BIF samples plot along a 2.1-Ga 143Nd/144Nd–147Sm/144Nd isochron in the study by Alibert and McCulloch (25), samples of the slightly older Marra Mamba BIF of the Hamersley Group plot along a 143Nd/144Nd–147Sm/144Nd reference isochron that corresponds to an age of 2.6 Ga (25), which is consistent with the depositional age, and a later metamorphic event should have affected both the Dales Gorge and the Marra Mamba BIFs.
Evidence against a homogenizing metamorphic event for the Dales Gorge member comes from in situ O-isotope analyses, which identified a substantial portion of low-δ18O primary iron oxides (hematite and low-Si magnetite), indicating insignificant or negligible resetting of O-isotope compositions in these minerals by hydrothermal or metamorphic events (20). Some studies have argued for a secondary origin for hematite in some BIF samples based on petrographic evidence (26), but a secondary origin is not consistent with O-isotope results. Nevertheless, to test the possibility that the Nd-isotope compositions measured in the BIFs reflect a high-Nd secondary hydrothermal/metamorphic component, which has high-δ18O values (20, 23), in situ REE analysis was performed and shows that the REE contents of hydrothermal or metamorphic magnetite are very low compared with low-δ18O primary iron oxides (typically <0.3 vs. ∼1 ppm Nd) (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). Previous Nd-isotope studies of BIFs have not shown the fine-scale distribution of REEs in oxide-facies BIFs tied to in situ O-isotope measurements on different oxide generations, but the results obtained here and the arguments above indicate that the measured Nd-isotope compositions and REE contents represent the most primary low-temperature hematite and magnetite in the samples. Such a finding is critical for inferring seawater Nd-isotope signals in BIFs. As will be shown below, the 143Nd/144Nd–147Sm/144Nd correlation that led Alibert and McCulloch (25) to infer a 2.1-Ga age is, in fact, a mixing line between distinct Nd components.
Coupling of Nd and Fe Isotopes in BIFs.
The large range in εNd-values suggests mixing between a low-εNd continental source and a high-εNd mantle source for the REEs (27). The key question, however, is whether there was coupling between Nd and Fe or whether there was two end-member mixing for Fe as well; εNd–δ56Fe variations provide a test of the hypotheses that Fe was solely supplied from hydrothermal sources (4–7) and that the low-δ56Fe values in BIFs are best explained by progressive partial oxidation of hydrothermal fluids (6, 16, 17). The relative slopes of εNd–δ56Fe variations (Fig. 2) are a function of the partition coefficients (Kd) for the REEs in iron oxides (28, 29) as well as the contrast in Nd-isotope compositions of the hydrothermal plume relative to the ambient ocean that had a continental Nd-isotope signature (30).
We assume a modest Δ56FeFe(OH)3-Fe(II)aq fractionation factor of +1.5‰, a hydrothermal fluid end member of δ56Fe = 0‰, εNd = +3, and Nd/Fe = 5 × 10−6 (grams per gram) (31); the ambient seawater component is assumed to have had zero initial Fe(II)aq, Nd content of 1.15 × 10−10g/g (32), and εNd-value of −3. Our assumption of zero aqueous Fe(II) in ambient seawater maximizes the effects of the partial oxidation model, and hence, it is a conservative test for the proposal that negative δ56Fe values are produced in the residual low-Fe(II)aq parts of the hydrothermal plume (6, 16). Although the Kd for REE partitioning into iron hydroxides can exceed 105 (typically >1,000) (28, 29), even a modest Kd of 10–50 shows that Nd contents of the hydrothermal plume will be rapidly depleted, such that mixing with ambient seawater will move the hydrothermal precipitates horizontally to the left in Fig. 2, failing to reproduce the observed εNd–δ56Fe variations. Use of higher, more realistic Kd values produces even poorer fits to the data. It is important to note that the model cannot start at a hydrothermal end member of δ56Fe = 0 and εNd = +3, because such an end member would imply a Δ56FeFe(OH)3-Fe(II)aq fractionation factor of zero, which violates the partial oxidation model, and would produce no change in δ56Fe values of the remaining Fe(II)aq. Use of a higher Δ56FeFe(OH)3-Fe(II)aq fractionation factor (+3‰) would produce even poorer fits to the observed εNd–δ56Fe variations (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). We conclude that the εNd–δ56Fe variations cannot be produced through partial oxidation of a single source of hydrothermally derived Fe but instead, reflect mixing of water masses that had distinct Fe- and Nd-isotope compositions (continental vs. mantle sources) in terms of dissolved Fe(II)aq and Nd followed by postmixing oxidation and precipitation as ferric oxyhydroxides, ultimately forming the BIFs.
Two Fe Sources for BIFs—a Microbial Fe Shuttle and Marine Hydrothermal Fluids.
The εNd–δ56Fe variations indicate that the continentally sourced Fe has near-zero to negative δ56Fe values down to −0.8‰, whereas the mantle/hydrothermally sourced Fe has slightly to strongly positive δ56Fe values. The majority of samples that have positive εNd-values have δ56Fe values that are slightly positive, indicating high extents of oxidation of hydrothermal Fe(II), although one highly positive δ56Fe value is consistent with less oxidation (33). There are several possibilities for the origin of the low-δ56Fe values for the continental (negative εNd) component. Although modern riverine input could have negative δ56Fe values (34) and dissolved Fe fluxes at ∼2.5 Ga could have been sufficiently large for producing BIFs (35), a high-Fe dissolved riverine flux would be expected to have near-zero δ56Fe values in a low-oxygen atmosphere, distinct from the low-δ56Fe values and the very low-Fe contents of modern rivers (34, 36).
Given the difficulty in producing the low-εNd and -δ56Fe end member through precipitation from a hydrothermal plume and direct oxidation of dissolved riverine runoffs, a process is required to actively pump low-δ56Fe Fe(II)aq into the Archean oceans from continental sources. Microbial DIR in coastal sediments is a mechanism that can release significant quantities of isotopically light Fe(II)aq to the oceans (15, 37, 38), and the model by Severmann et al. (21) for explaining low-δ56Fe sedimentary pyrite by a DIR-driven Fe shuttle can be tested for its applicability to the Dales Gorge BIF based on the correlation between εNd- and δ56Fe values as well as Sm/Nd ratios. Support for a DIR shuttle as the source of the low-εNd and -δ56Fe component in the 2.5-Ga BIFs of this study comes from εNd–Sm/Nd relations (Fig. 3). Microbial dissolution of iron hydroxides in modern marine sediments is accompanied by significant REE fractionation, where Fe(II)-rich pore waters contain significantly higher Sm/Nd ratios than bulk sediments (39), and this relation matches that seen for Sm/Nd ratios of the low-εNd continental component relative to Sm/Nd ratios for Archean shales (Fig. 3). Importantly, Eu is preferentially mobilized during microbial diagenesis in marine sediments, producing positive Eu anomalies in pore fluids relative to bulk sediments (32, 40) and implying that the positive Eu anomaly may not be a unique indicator for a hydrothermal source for BIFs as previously thought (4, 5, 41). For the hydrothermal component, εNd–Sm/Nd relations indicate low Sm/Nd ratios (Fig. 3), which likely reflect the effect of Fe(III) hydroxide precipitation given the fact that both laboratory experiments and field studies have shown that adsorption to particulate Fe(III) hydroxide fractionates REEs and that Sm is more strongly adsorbed onto Fe(III) particulates than Nd (28, 42), decreasing the Sm/Nd ratio in the remaining solution (Fig. 3). In short, the observed REE data (Eu anomaly and Sm/Nd ratio) are consistent with the proposed mixing model between two end members with fractionated REE signatures; this proposal may be tested through additional REE analysis, including Y determinations, although such an approach was not possible in this study because of measurement of the REEs by the isotope dilution method on the same aliquot measured for Fe and Nd isotopes.
Synthesizing the Nd- and Fe-isotope data and REE signatures, we propose a dual-source model for BIF genesis (Fig. 4C), where biologically recycled continental Fe and hydrothermal Fe from MOR systems both contributed as sources to BIFs. In the coastal region, Fe was sourced to continental runoff, and oxidation of aqueous Fe(II) produced Fe(III) oxyhydroxides that settled in a proximal continental shelf setting. Meanwhile, detritus and colloids brought by runoffs were efficiently removed by gravity settling and salt-induced coagulation (ref. 32 and references therein). Oxidation of riverine Fe(II) could have occurred through either oxygenic photosynthesis or Fe(II)-oxidizing, anoxygenic phototrophs (43, 44). Primary production of organic C and riverine supply of nutrients, such as P, along with Fe(III) oxyhydroxides would support DIR (45) in the proximal continental shelf. Export of Fe to the deep basin by a microbial Fe shuttle occurred at least initially through aqueous Fe(II) generated by DIR, and remobilization of the REEs by DIR-induced dissolution of Fe(III) oxyhydroxides produced the positive Eu anomalies and high Sm/Nd ratios that are characteristic of the low-εNd and -δ56Fe component (Fig. 4C). These components ultimately mixed with diluted hydrothermal fluids that were sourced to the open ocean at different proportions, reoxidized (presumably in the photic zone), and precipitated as BIF precursors (Fig. 4C). Our model differs from the commonly held view that MOR hydrothermal fluids are the sole Fe source for BIFs (Fig. 4B), which cannot explain the spread in εNd and coupling of Fe- and Nd-isotope compositions. Our model also differs from the early hypothesis that BIFs were formed by direct precipitation of continental Fe brought to the oceans through riverine inputs (Fig. 4A), which cannot explain the low-δ56Fe values and εNd–Sm/Nd relations in the BIF samples analyzed here. In addition, the DIR mechanism in the dual-source model decouples the continental isotopic signal from siliciclastic debris by mobilization by DIR and hence, also addresses the issue of low detrital contents in BIFs that have continental Nd isotopic signatures.
The DIR-driven Fe shuttle, which transports low-δ56Fe iron to the deeper parts of the basin, should produce a complementary high-δ56Fe pool of residual Fe in the proximal continental shelf. In the case of the Hamersley Basin, however, there are no proximal equivalents preserved, and the Dales Gorge member only provides a view of the deep basin setting. Iron-isotope data from the Kuruman Iron Formation (South Africa), which is correlative with the Brockman Iron Formation (9), provide support for a proximal high-δ56Fe iron pool. Investigations by Heimann et al. (19) on the Kuruman Iron Formation reveal that samples from drill core (WB-98) of proximal sediments have consistently higher δ56Fe values that those from drill core (AD-5) of distal sediments. Broadly, therefore, the Fe-isotope data of the Hamersley–Transvaal basin are consistent with the geographic trends expected for a DIR-driven Fe shuttle.
Implications for Archean Ocean Environments.
The range and distribution of εNd-values in the BIF samples (Fig. 3) suggest that the amount of continental Fe recycled by DIR processes was comparable with the amount of Fe provided by MOR hydrothermal activity in the ocean at 2.5 Ga, at least for the BIFs in the Hamersley Group. To fuel such large-scale Fe recycling by DIR, a high primary productivity was required to generate sufficient amounts of organic carbon in coastal sediments (45). Identification of biologically recycled continental Fe as a major component in BIFs, therefore, attests to a vigorous microbial ecosystem in the late Archean ocean, where both Fe(II)-oxidizing and Fe(III)-reducing microbes thrived in the water column and soft sediment, respectively (43, 44). An active role for large-scale transport of Fe by DIR during BIF genesis at 2.5 Ga reflects relatively low-oxygen and -sulfide contents in the majority of the water column at this time, allowing transport of Fe as aqueous Fe(II), which would not be possible in the presence of high dissolved sulfide. Moreover, a major role for DIR in marine ecosystems at this time is consistent with the deeply rooted nature of Fe reduction metabolisms based on molecular phylogeny (46).
Demonstration of the dual sources of Fe for BIFs, one hydrothermal and one DIR-driven Fe shuttle from continental shelves, raises the question of the timescales over which such sources could have operated. It has been proposed, for example, that Fe(III) oxides in BIFs may be produced by photosynthetic oxidation of Fe(II)aq (44, 47), which in turn, might indicate seasonal variations that correlate with light intensity. At the smallest scale of banding, the submillimeter microbands that have been interpreted to represent annual varve-like layers (48, 49), in situ Fe-isotope analyses in this study show relatively small variation over timescales of ∼103 y (Fig. 1). These results suggest that the DIR-driven Fe shuttle did not respond to seasonal changes in photosynthetic primary productivity, such as the amount of organic carbon production, at least from the perspective of the site of BIF deposition for the samples studied here. In contrast, at the scale of individual macrobands, which represent periods of ∼105 y, Fe sources were clearly variable, as shown, for example, by macrosampling of BIF16 (Fig. 1). Over the ∼50-My period represented by the entire Dales Gorge member (24), the balance between hydrothermal and continental DIR Fe sources also varied (Fig. 1). We conclude that the relative proportions of DIR and hydrothermal Fe sources recorded in BIF deposition were controlled by long-timescale changes that reflect variability in basin-wide circulation changes on the order of 105–106 y. It is possible that basin-wide sampling transects might record different scales of isotopic variability depending on conditions that affected the proportion of DIR- and hydrothermally sourced Fe. Nevertheless, the combined Fe- and Nd-isotope analysis indicates that BIFs formed from two sources of Fe and that an active DIR-driven Fe shuttle was operating at 2.5 Ga.
Materials and Methods
Small chips (typically 200–500 mg) were cut from the diamond drill core DDH-47A for bulk rock analyses. Sample digestion and ion exchange chromatography were performed using doubly distilled acids in a clean chemistry room. Bulk rock Neodymium isotope compositions were measured using a VG Instruments Sector 54 Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer. Bulk rock REEs were determined by isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) using a Micromass IsoProbe multi-collector inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS). Iron-isotope measurements were conducted using a Micromass IsoProbe MC-ICP-MS and an Aridus Desolvating Nebulizer with standard–sample–standard bracketing method (19); the external long-term reproducibility (2 SD) for δ56Fe measurements using this method is ±0.08‰.
Centimeter- or subcentimeter-sized samples were cut from the diamond drill core DDH-47A and were embedded into 1-in-round epoxy plugs for in situ Fe-isotope and REE analyses. In situ analyses were done based on detailed back scattered electron (BSE) images (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). In situ Fe-isotope analysis was done using a femtosecond laser ablation (fs-LA) MC-ICP-MS system that consists of a femtosecond source laser that produces an output 266-nm beam, a Photon-Machines Beam-Delivery System, a Photon-Machines HelEX Ablation Cell, and a Micromass IsoProbe MC-ICP-MS (20). A standard–sample–standard bracketing method was used for mass bias and instrument drift correction. A magnetite in-house standard and a hematite in-house standard were used as the matrix-matching standards for fs-LA Fe-isotope analysis. External precision (reproducibility) of the fs-LA analysis was better than ±0.2‰ (2 SD) in δ56Fe (20). In situ REE analysis was done using a system that consists of a Photon-Machines femtosecond laser and an Nu Plasma II MC-ICP-MS with multiple ion counting settings. More detailed explanations of the methods can be found in SI Appendix, section 2.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study benefited from discussions with Xinyuan Zheng, who also provided the compiled rare earth element data for modern midocean ridge hydrothermal vent fluids, and reviews by Kurt Konhauser and Balz Kamber. This study was supported by the NASA Astrobiology Institute. W.L. was supported by the 1000 Talent Program of China.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1505515112/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Cloud P. Paleoecological significance of the banded iron-formation. Econ Geol. 1973;68(7):1135–1143. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lepp H, Goldich SS. Origin of Precambrian iron formations. Econ Geol. 1964;59(6):1025–1060. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Holland HD. The Chemistry of the Atmosphere and Oceans. Wiley; New York: 1978. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bau M, Möller P. Rare earth element systematics of the chemically precipitated component in early precambrian iron formations and the evolution of the terrestrial atmosphere-hydrosphere-lithosphere system. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1993;57(10):2239–2249. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klein C, Beukes NJ. Geochemistry and sedimentology of a facies transition from limstone to iron-formation deposition in the early Proterozoic Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa. Econ Geol. 1989;84(7):1733–1774. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.85.4.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bekker A, et al. Iron formation: The sedimentary product of a complex interplay among mantle, tectonic, oceanic, and biospheric processes. Econ Geol. 2010;105(3):467–508. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Klein C. Some Precambrian banded iron-formations (BIFs) from around the world: Their age, geologic setting, mineralogy, metamorphism, geochemistry, and origins. Am Mineral. 2005;90(10):1473–1499. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alexander BW, Bau M, Andersson P, Dulski P. Continentally-derived solutes in shallow Archean seawater: Rare earth element and Nd isotope evidence in iron formation from the 2.9 Ga Pongola Supergroup, South Africa. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2008;72(2):378–394. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Beukes NJ, Gutzmer J. 2008. Origin and paleoenvironmental significance of major iron formations at the Archean-Paleoproterozoic boundary. Banded Iron Formation-Related High-Grade Iron Ore, Reviews in Economic Geology, eds Hagemann SG, Rosiere C, Gutzmer J (Society of Economic Geologists, Inc., Beukes, NJ), Vol 15, pp 5–47.
- 10.Alexander BW, Bau M, Andersson P. Neodymium isotopes in Archean seawater and implications for the marine Nd cycle in Earth's early oceans. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2009;283(1–4):144–155. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Miller RG, O'Nions RK. Source of Precambrian chemical and clastic sediments. Nature. 1985;314(6009):325–330. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang C, Zhang L, Dai Y, Li W. Source characteristics of the ∼2.5 Ga Wangjiazhuang Banded Iron Formation from the Wutai greenstone belt in the North China Craton: Evidence from neodymium isotopes. J Asian Earth Sci. 2014;93(0):288–300. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haugaard R, Frei R, Stendal H, Konhauser K. Petrology and geochemistry of the ∼2.9 Ga Itilliarsuk banded iron formation and associated supracrustal rocks, West Greenland: Source characteristics and depositional environment. Precambrian Res. 2013;229(0):150–176. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Viehmann S, Hoffmann JE, Münker C, Bau M. Decoupled Hf-Nd isotopes in Neoarchean seawater reveal weathering of emerged continents. Geology. 2013;42(2):115–118. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Johnson CM, Beard BL, Roden EE. The iron isotope fingerprints of redox and biogeochemical cycling in modern and ancient Earth. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2008;36(1):457–493. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Planavsky N, et al. Iron isotope composition of some Archean and Proterozoic iron formations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2012;80:158–169. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rouxel OJ, Bekker A, Edwards KJ. Iron isotope constraints on the Archean and Paleoproterozoic ocean redox state. Science. 2005;307(5712):1088–1091. doi: 10.1126/science.1105692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Johnson CM, Ludois JM, Beard BL, Beukes NJ, Heimann A. Iron formation carbonates: Paleoceanographic proxy or recorder of microbial diagenesis? Geology. 2013;41(11):1147–1150. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Heimann A, et al. Fe, C, and O isotope compositions of banded iron formation carbonates demonstrate a major role for dissimilatory iron reduction in ∼2.5 Ga marine environments. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2010;294(1-2):8–18. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li W, et al. Contrasting behavior of oxygen and iron isotopes in banded iron formations revealed by in situ isotopic analysis. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2013;384(0):132–143. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Severmann S, Lyons TW, Anbar A, McManus J, Gordon G. Modern iron isotope perspective on the benthic iron shuttle and the redox evolution of ancient oceans. Geology. 2008;36(6):487–490. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trendall AF, Blockley JG. 1968. Stratigraphy of the Dales Gorge Member of the Brockman Iron formation in the Precambrian Hamersley Group of Western Australia. Geological Survey of Western Australia Annual Report for 1967, ed Davies AB (The Department of Mines Western Australia, Perth, Australia), pp 86–91.
- 23.Huberty JM, et al. Silician magnetite from the Dales Gorge Member of the Brockman Iron Formation, Hamersley Group, Western Australia. Am Mineral. 2012;97(1):26–37. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Trendall AF, Compston W, Nelson DR, De Laeter JR, Bennett VC. SHRIMP zircon ages constraining the depositional chronology of the Hamersley Group, Western Australia. Aust J Earth Sci. 2004;51(5):621–644. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alibert C, McCulloch MT. Rare earth element and neodymium isotopic compositions of the banded iron-formations and associated shales from Hamersley, western Australia. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1993;57(1):187–204. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rasmussen B, Krapež B, Meier DB. Replacement origin for hematite in 2.5 Ga banded iron formation: Evidence for postdepositional oxidation of iron-bearing minerals. Geol Soc Am Bull. 2014;126(3-4):438–446. [Google Scholar]
- 27.DePaolo DJ. Neodymium Isotope Geochemistry: An Introduction. Springer; Heidelberg: 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Koeppenkastrop D, De Carlo EH. Sorption of rare-earth elements from seawater onto synthetic mineral particles: An experimental approach. Chem Geol. 1992;95(3–4):251–263. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Quinn KA, Byrne RH, Schijf J. Sorption of yttrium and rare earth elements by amorphous ferric hydroxide: Influence of pH and ionic strength. Mar Chem. 2006;99(1–4):128–150. doi: 10.1021/es0618191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Piepgras DJ, Wasserburg GJ. Neodymium isotopic variations in seawater. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1980;50(1):128–138. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Olivarez AM, Owen RM. REE/Fe variations in hydrothermal sediments: Implications for the REE content of seawater. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1989;53(3):757–762. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sholkovitz ER. The geochemistry of rare earth elements in the Amazon River estuary. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1993;57(10):2181–2190. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Czaja AD, et al. Evidence for free oxygen in the Neoarchean ocean based on coupled iron-molybdenum isotope fractionation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2012;86:118–137. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fantle MS, DePaolo DJ. Iron isotopic fractionation during continental weathering. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2004;228(3-4):547–562. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Holland HD. The Chemical Evolution of the Atmosphere and Oceans. Princeton Univ Press; Princeton: 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yamaguchi KE, Johnson CM, Beard BL, Ohmoto H. Biogeochemical cycling of iron in the Archean-Paleoproterozoic Earth: Constraints from iron isotope variations in sedimentary rocks from the Kaapvaal and Pilbara Cratons. Chem Geol. 2005;218(1-2):135–169. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Severmann S, Johnson CM, Beard BL, McManus J. The effect of early diagenesis on the Fe isotope compositions of porewaters and authigenic minerals in continental margin sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2006;70(8):2006–2022. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bergquist BA, Boyle EA. Iron isotopes in the Amazon River system: Weathering and transport signatures. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2006;248(1-2):54–68. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Haley BA, Klinkhammer GP, McManus J. Rare earth elements in pore waters of marine sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2004;68(6):1265–1279. [Google Scholar]
- 40.MacRae ND, Nesbitt HW, Kronberg BI. Development of a positive Eu anomaly during diagenesis. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1992;109(3–4):585–591. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fryer BJ. Rare earth evidence in iron-formations for changing Precambrian oxidation states. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1977;41(3):361–367. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rudnicki MD, Elderfield H. A chemical model of the buoyant and neutrally buoyant plume above the TAG vent field, 26 degrees N, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1993;57(13):2939–2957. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Czaja AD, et al. Iron and carbon isotope evidence for ecosystem and environmental diversity in the ∼2.7 to 2.5 Ga Hamersley Province, Western Australia. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2010;292(1-2):170–180. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kappler A, Pasquero C, Konhauser KO, Newman DK. Deposition of banded iron formations by anoxygenic phototrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria. Geology. 2005;33(11):865–868. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Konhauser KO, Newman DK, Kappler A. The potential significance of microbial Fe(III)-reduction during Precambrian banded iron formations. Geobiology. 2005;3(3):167–177. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Weber KA, Achenbach LA, Coates JD. Microorganisms pumping iron: Anaerobic microbial iron oxidation and reduction. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(10):752–764. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Posth NR, Hegler F, Konhauser KO, Kappler A. Alternating Si and Fe deposition caused by temperature fluctuations in Precambrian oceans. Nat Geosci. 2008;1(10):703–708. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Morris RC. Genetic modelling for banded iron-formation of the Hamersley Group, Pilbara Craton, Western Australia. Precambrian Res. 1993;60(1–4):243–286. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Drever JI. Geochemical Model for the Origin of Precambrian Banded Iron Formations. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1974;85(7):1099–1106. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.